My Letter to Ed Hochuli. Really.
After the jump is an email I sent off to Mr. Hochuli last night. I will certainly let you know what he says if he actually responds.

Mr. Hochuli,
My name is David Saintsational and I am a New Orleans Saints season ticket holder and die-hard Saints fan. I also write and manage a popular New Orleans Saints fan website called CanalStreetChronicles.com.
I first want to express my sincere gratitude to you and every other NFL official. Yours is not an easy job and without the work that all of you do, football fans in America wouldn’t be able to enjoy to sport they hold so dearly. I know you and the league take officiating very seriously and discuss each game in-depth afterwards including what went right and what went wrong.
Like most fans in New Orleans this week, I am obviously disappointed with the officiating by you and your team during the Vikings/Saints game on October 6th, 2008. I am not writing to berate or belittle you as I‘m sure many others do. Also please know that while this letter is addressed to you, I put the blame on your entire team. I understand that throughout the course of a game some infractions get missed. Such is the nature of the game. However, this game appeared to have more than the usual incorrect and/or missed calls on the most obvious of plays. The blatant face mask penalty by Chad Greenway on Reggie Bush and subsequent turnover that went uncalled being the most egregious and game changing of them all. Can you offer any explanation for the peculiar officiating during this game?
I’m sure you know as well as anyone else that even one play can alter the ebb and flow of power and momentum between two football teams during the course of an NFL game and can be incredibly important to the final outcome. Too important to ever be decided simply by the judgment of a few individuals. The league has clearly acknowledged the importance of getting calls right by allowing video replay to make sure calls involving turnovers, out of bounds, touchdown rulings etc. are made correctly. As a fan who only wants to see the game of football continue to grow, improve and be as fair as possible to everyone involved, I wonder if a rules change should be in the leagues sights for the near future. Penalties that do or do not get called can affect a game as easily as any touchdown, field goal or first down. Therefore they should, at least in certain situations, be made reviewable. To be sure, making all infractions reviewable would be opening Pandora’s Box. Perhaps it could be limited just to facemask penalties? Maybe infractions that result in a turnover should only be allowed for review?
By no means am I an expert on the game of football. I am merely a fan. But the aforementioned replay rules change seems obvious and necessary but perhaps I am missing something. Seeing a clear violation of the rules before all of our eyes and not being able to do anything about it just doesn't sit right with me as it shouldn't sit right with you. Understandably, you are not the one who can make these changes. However, if you have any input with the league regarding rules changes this off-season, I ask that you please take my suggestions with a modicum of seriousness. It’s too late for the Saints but it might not be too late for another team.
I thank you for taking the time to read this letter and I hope to hear from you in the near future.
Sincerely,
David Saintsational
Comments
"...David Saintsational..." (Ed, that's not my real name, btw)
I want to see that jersey: Number 9 with SAINTSATIONAL across the back. Big seller! LOL
by stujo4 on
Oct 8, 2008 8:52 AM CDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Penalty review?
I understand the frustration of Saints fans this week. However, the idea of reviewing penalties is completely unsound. Under your suggested review change, (penalties on plays that result in a turnover) teams would be constantly trying to point out holds for refs to review on EVERY turnover. Review is good for the game (although it doesn’t seem to work all the time) but there comes a point where you have to let the referees do their job. Why don’t we just have 40 camera guys running around on the field, with no referees, and review every single play? That way, no call ever gets missed… Human error is a factor of sports that we as fans are beginning to not want to tolerate. This is baffling to me.
Obviously from my name I am a Vikings fan, and I am not here to belittle or insult. I’m not like that. I just know (our teams seem to have similar reputations for getting screwed) how you feel right now, but think that your proposed rule change should be considered more blowing off steam than an actual future proposal. Penalties should never be reviewable. I believe this idea would ruin the game.
Here’s to a Vikes/Saints rematch in the playoffs. I know it’d be one helluva matchup!
V-I-K-I-N-G-S! Skol Vikings, Let's Go!!
by TheViking83 on
Oct 8, 2008 9:13 AM CDT
reply
actions
0 recs
I don't think so
To start with, each coach is allowed two challenges per half, with an unsuccessful challenge costing the team a time out, so your theory of being able to challenge EVERY possible hold or nit picking every situation of every turnover is impossible. My theory is that you make potential penalties part of a review of an already allowed situation. In this case an infraction that occurs and is blatantly obvious, such as the face mask on the Bush turnover, could be seen as part of a review of the turnover and called as a penalty after review. If you have a play that can be reviewed, then every aspect of that play could and should be a part of that review, including penalties. Did the face mask penalty cause the turnover? Maybe, maybe not. But it occurred before the ball came loose and therefore would have erased the turnover.
I raised this question on the open thread at the time of the play. Why doesn’t coach Payton challenge the fumble? In the review can they call the penalty? 70,000 fans in the Dome saw it, the announcers for ESPN saw it, I know the millions watching on tv saw it. Vikings fans had to be saying “Whew, we got away with one there”. Would the call have changed the outcome of the game? Who knows. But it sure changed the momentum of the game.
by BayouRebel on
Oct 8, 2008 9:54 AM CDT
up
reply
actions
1 recs
Very good points!
Even after a review, I don’t think the rules allow for them to call it back after seeing the obvious twisting of Reggie’s neck. They wouldn’t be able to take that into consideration, only whether or not Reggie’s knee was down before the ball came out, which it wasn’t. I hate to admit it, but Reggie still should have held onto the ball. I realize the shock of having your head twisted can cause a player to forget about what his hands are doing and ball control, but I’ve seen other RB’s get worse and still hold on. But, that’s beside the point. If Hochuli had reviewed it, it would have just resulted in the same thing that happened in Denver with Norv Turner. Hochuli would have to walk over to Payton and say, “We blew it.” The play as called would still stand.
Go Saints!!!!
by satchmo26 on
Oct 8, 2008 10:05 AM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Great letter
Well said. I’d be surprised if he responds though, since the league reportedly jumped all over him for responding to the many he received after the Chargers/Broncos debacle.
I’m hesitant to suggest that some penalties should be reviewable, but I’d like to see a review option when it comes to obvious missed face-mask penalties that obviously cause a fumble. That’s right, the twisting around of Reggie’s head caused that fumble, so it should have been called back. There’s probably no way to implement a rule change that would allow for reviews like this, so we shouldn’t hold our breath.
Sometimes these blown calls go our way and sometimes they go to the other team. I remember seeing what looked like a hold by Jammal Brown in the Bucs game that was missed and resulted in Reggie scoring a TD. It sucks when it happens to our team, but it will always happen from time to time. The Saints beat the Saints Monday night, not the refs or even the Vikings.
I still think the NFL seriously needs to adjust it’s mindset and approach to hiring referees. With the high speed of the game as it today, I think things would improve with younger eyes and bodies running around out there trying to catch every little infraction and miscue. After running up and down the field, referees also get tired during the game. Only, they don’t get breaks off the field like the players do. The modern day game is just too fast for some of these 50 and 60 year old guys to keep up with for three hours.
I hope this doesn’t come across as ageism as I truly respect my elders and those with several decades of life experience. Maybe this wouldn’t help at all, but an officiating improvement/policy adjustment of some kind couldn’t hurt. The addition several years ago of video review was supposed to help rectify the unavoidable mistakes that human beings inevitably make so these errors wouldn’t interfere with the outcome of the game. Well, it ain’t workin’.
Go Saints!!!!
by satchmo26 on
Oct 8, 2008 9:56 AM CDT
reply
actions
0 recs
I think the problem is...
the face mask was completely obvious. When Bush’s body is going one way and the head is going the opposite direction, there is obviously something amiss on the play. Why was there no call? You can’t tell me that one the refs were out of posistion because when the faskmask occured he was closer to midfield than sideline and, correct me if I’m wrong, but aren’t there like 7 refs on the field. I’m not saying we deserved to win, those penalites and botch snaps were inexcusable! But I believe we would have scored on that drive which would have negated the Vikes last field goal. Who knows how the game would have cont. after that play if it had gone with the flag. This is profressional football officials, not pee wee… missed calls that were this obvious, much like the neutral zone infraction in the Denver game, are inexcusable.
Maybe Im just pissed off… but as they say, better to be pissed of than pissed on!
I don’t think the season is over… far from it. I still have faith. When we get healthly, we will rip through some teams. I’m just hoping we get health in time
by tlsk1066 on
Oct 8, 2008 11:41 AM CDT
reply
actions
0 recs
I still have faith too
I’d much rather see these miscues and injuries early in the year instead of later during a playoff run. The Saints are 2 – 3, but they are only 10 points short of being 5 – 0. Two of the three losses were against teams that are 4 – 1. This is still a very good team. The loss to the Vikes was on the offense, turnovers and stupid penalties is what killed the game. The bright spot is that the offense IS much better than this, their playing bad games are the exception and not the rule. The D is playing well and seems to be getting better. I can still see them being a 10 – 6 team come December. It won’t be easy but it is possible.
by BayouRebel on
Oct 8, 2008 12:37 PM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Getting your head twisted is going to cause a fumble...
Every time your on the field you now that any time a play can end your career and maybe even disable you for life. Some one twisting your neck while your running is probably going to make you care more about your neck than that ball. Although in general Reggie needs to hold on to the ball better. I think, this play is no fault on him at all.
by TAYDIGGA on
Oct 8, 2008 2:21 PM CDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Pandora's box
not even close.
You get TWO red flags a half. If you throw one and its deemed you should not have .. you lose a time out.
Right now you rarely see 2 thrown a half. You do see most timeouts taken (at least in the 2nd half).
adding more reviewable plays is NOT going to change how many can be thrown… its still just 2. Dont like that offside call? red flag it? what a waste when your out of flags and the ball bounces twice off the ground before the reciever catches it for a TD. oops your out of challanges.
You are not going to see a slew of extra challanges… its too risky to waste them.
MT
by MT_always on
Oct 8, 2008 2:34 PM CDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Bad Officiating
This Game was Screwed from the start by the Officials.The saints should have been up 21-0 in the first Quater. That pass to Lance Moore in the endzone was an Automatic pass interference call. The Minnesota player never turned his head around to look for the ball. They took away a Reggie bush first down near the goaline, with a legal block by Mike Karney. They also Had a ref right in front of Reggie on a Punt return in which the minn Player had two hands on his face mask. The hit on Billy miller was a clear helmet to helmet,that should have been an automatic 15 yard penalty. Drew Brees was hit in the head with a forearm after he had got rid of the ball, which by new league rules should have been an automatic 15 yarder. The bernard Berrian touchdown was an Illegal pick, which is how Tracy Porter’s wrist got between the two minn players.The officials took away the saints momentum and my enjoyment as a fan,and ultimately the game. Thsese officials should be suspended for at least 6 months, this was awful. If officials are not severly punished, this will continue. As fans we need to protest as well as the owners of the teams that have been ripped off.
by BlackKnight on
Oct 8, 2008 6:34 PM CDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Welcome, BK
Jeff Duncan at the T-Pic thinks we’re all poosay’s for complaining about the officiating. I think he’s trying too hard not to be a homer.
http://blog.nola.com/saintsbeat/2008/10/wednesday_film_study_vikingssa.html
by stujo4 on
Oct 8, 2008 9:44 PM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs













