Jammal Brown ruled out for Bears game; Strief to sub
I hope this doesn't present a problem. Jammal has been guilty of some penalty calls, but I wonder if Zach can protect Drew's blind side for the whole game. I know he filled in for Jammal once before and did well. I hope that happens again.
11 months ago
satchmo26
6 comments
0 recs |
Email
PrintComments
I have no problem with this...
Jammal Brown is on my shit list right now…
8-8, Here We Come...
by Hollywoo! on Dec 10, 2008 3:05 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Well
I don’t really care for J. Brown, but I don’t like the situation that’s bringing Streif in.
If we had a full week, it would be a better situation, but now he won’t get the reps that he would’ve gotten on a full week.
But who knows, maybe we’ll get a better deal with Streif.
WHO DAT
by pukenbowl on Dec 10, 2008 3:29 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
He’ll get help from Shockey if he needs it, like they did when Jammal was struggling with Abraham.
by stujo4 on Dec 10, 2008 3:54 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Did they shift the strong side to the left just to help out Brown?
I didn’t notice that. Tells you something, though.
Stupid Bucs...
by MtnExile on Dec 10, 2008 5:54 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I don't know why
but, I think this game will be a lot like the Seattle game last year.
WHO DAT
by pukenbowl on Dec 10, 2008 6:47 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
I could handle that!
"We're one of the better third-down teams in the league..." Saints linebacker Scott Fujita
by HansDat on Dec 10, 2008 8:01 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Comments For This Post Are Closed
Secondary Sidebar
User Tools
FanPosts
Community blog posts and discussion.
Certain photos copyright © 2009 by Associated Press or Getty Images. Any commercial use or distribution without the express written consent of Associated Press and Getty Images is strictly prohibited.
