Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: My First Fight: Diego Sanchez

"Saints Blitzed More Than Fans Give Them Credit For" is BS

I have read and heard several times that some people like J. Duncan and  others have said that the Saints have blitzed a reasonable amount and more than the fans realize, and this is total BS. Anyone watching these playoff games sees a stark contrast to what is happening in those games on defense compared to what happened week in and week out with the Saints.  Teams like Baltimore and Tennessee, Phila and Carolina, even Arizona, San Diego-and you will see it from the Giants today.  There is 1) Variety - anything and everything from the LBs and DEs to confuse the OL and QB and get an edge whether it is just faked or they actually follow thru on an overload or a DE covering a RB in the flat or DL stunting and attacking from different locations. 

2) Committment  -  in today's NFL, a 5 man rush isn't really a blitz, it's a moderate attempt at pressure. Sometimes it is the right thing to do, but you have to do it with some other type of wrinkle or the pros on the other side usually handle it.  When you send 6, or even 7, the adrenalin gets pumped, the rush is on, everone from the SS to the DT knows it is all or nothing and fortunately, 90% of the time the DBs only have to cover a receiver for 2 seconds. Usually the play is changed at the line and it is a very short pass attempt or draw play and you only have to cover  the first 15-20 yards from the LOS. And, when you do this one or two times, just the appearence of the possiblility of it happening on another down when the D is faking causes audibles, receivers to break off routes when they don't have to or QBs looking to different routes by mistake. That's one of the things that a defense wants to create- confusion, doubt and a change in offensive plans.  IT comes with risk, but it's about committment and becoming good at it and believing that you can pressure them more than they can pressure you. If you don't have that type of mentality, then you are a passive defense anyway you are going to get mopped up anyway so what's the difference?  At least go down trying instead of being a punching bag.   The Saints NEVER did that kind of thing.  Every offense that faced us basically knew what we were going to do with a very high probability. If you don't believe me, watch NY vs Phil today or SD vs. Pitt and compare with a tape of a Saints game this season.  The contrast is sickening.

  

This FanPost was written by a reader and member of Canal Street Chronicles. It does not necessarily reflect the views of CSC and its staff or editors.

Comment 4 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

A bold statement, sir

I think perhaps the Saints attempted to blitz at an NFL average rate. It’s just hard to tell, considering their abject failure at it.

Get Sean McDermott!

by MtnExile on Jan 11, 2009 9:03 AM CST reply actions   1 recs

boom I rec'd it

They were blitzing. It just didn’t LOOK like it.

Get me another beer, Dragon Lady!

by stujo4 on Jan 11, 2009 11:01 AM CST reply actions  

What a difference!!

no, if you watched the playoffs this weekend, you saw bold inniovative defenses who blitzed, stunted, and did anything they could to pressure the QB and usually did. They committed. They confused and caused chaos they took chances- and usually those chances paid off. But, they had a purpose, a much better purpose than just reacting to an offense that was trying to kick their ass. They looked like they were playing a different sport than the defense that Gary Gibbs dialed up.

by Philinwood on Jan 11, 2009 8:02 PM CST reply actions  

I'm

not a X-O’s guy by any means but at least 2 of the teams still left (Ravens, Steelers) run the 3-4 which relies heavily on blizting, particularly LB blitzes. In fact, the RE/LE’s in the 3-4 aren’t “rush ends” like they are in the 4-3, they primarily (along with the NT) clog up lanes to stop the run and keep the LB’s free to shoot gaps, drop back etc…

Thirty-Six to Nothing

by Bens4vcobra on Jan 14, 2009 12:32 PM CST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

The ultimate community for lovers of all things Black and Gold! The latest news, commentary, discussion, linkage and more! Join in the conversation now with all of your fellow Who Dats!

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

1311373128_guildwars2commando_697440_small
CSC Lagniappe: #13 Alltime Saints

Recent FanPosts

014_small
Would you like to see the Saints sign Albert Haynesworth?
Colts-saints-2_small
Has anyone ever done the Punt, Pass and Kick competition
Small
Saints showing disrespect towards Drew Brees
Images_small
Hosting the Super Bowl
Small
Understanding our broken psyche (or "Why does it still hurt?")
Small
12 men on the field strategy?
Evil_bunny_small
Statistical Breakdown of WR Usage
271015_10150225174105754_682505753_7748609_5242564_n_1__small
My thoughts on the offseason
Angry_birds_small
About Robert Meachem

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Featured Poll

Poll
Which Saints regular season was better: 2009 or 2011?
2009
402 votes
2011
446 votes

848 votes | Poll has closed

Twitter-logo_medium


Head Coach

Erindavewhodat_small Dave Cariello

Assistant Coach (Editor/Contributor)

0113wbphillips_small Hans Petersen

Saintslogo_small Andrew Juge

Offensive Coordinators (Contributors)

13088_f520_small David "Satch" Kelly

Top_small Alex Swift

L_f46d02fdda5fad668929c4424cb0d2dc_small Preston J. Gary, Jr.

100media36imag0036_small Travis Dauro