Canal Street Chronicles: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
New Blog: Voodoo Five for South Florida Bulls Fans!

It's too early to give up on Reggie


Reggie-bush-running_medium

via www.everyjoe.com


I'm seeing more and more people asking for trades and everything else with regard to Reggie Bush. You could say much of the rhetoric is warranted, so don't expect me to attempt to deflect the knocks against him and start the same old argument. I just wanted to inject some new thoughts into this.

Also, before the jump, there's something that always bugged me, that I feel like pointing out. The Reggie Bush - Gale Sayers comparison. People lauded Bush as the second coming of Gale Sayers. Maybe. They have very similar styles, but Gale Sayers wouldn't be able to achieve nearly as much today as he did back then. Defenses were a lot slower, and he actually had the ability to run around and by them with ease. So it may have been okay to compare the two, but it is unfair to expect the same numbers and accomplishments from both backs.

Star-divide

Like most things, football has different time periods . . . eras if you will. In the early days of football there was one rule, RUN. Whereas nowadays it's more common to see 60% of offensive plays taking to the air. How did we transition from one style to the other over the years? The players dictated the need for change.

Individuals like Johnny Unitas, Raymond Berry and Don Hutson showed coaches, owners and teams that you could not only be successful with the pass, it could win you championships.

Larry Wilson is a large part of the reason we have the safety blitz and unique blitz packages.

Joe Montana took Bill Walsh's West Coast Offense and made it into a household name (One nearly every team in the NFL tries to duplicate).

Randal Cunningham brought back the era of the scrambling quarterback beating you with his feet or buying time for the long completion.

The list goes on and on.

No one will argue over the abilities of these players, their impacts on their teams and the plays run, or their impact on the NFL as a whole, but . . . what if they were in the wrong era of football? What if they didn't have coaches that saw how to make the most of their abilities and levels of talent?

What if Joe Montana was around in the 20s?

What if Chuck Drulis didn't have "Wildcat" Larry Wilson to execute his highly unconventional safety blitz, and it failed miserably?

What if Randal Cunningham was benched for not staying in the pocket?

How many other Joe Montanas, Larry Wilsons or Randal Cunninghams were out there playing in the wrong timeframe. How many players were so far ahead of their time, that they just weren't utilized in such a way as to revolutionize the game?

Gentlemen (And any ladies that may be out there), I submit Exhibit A: Reggie Bush. He is truly a unique athlete, no one can take that away from him. Certainly there are other runningbacks and players like him, but there is not now, nor has there ever been a player with his exact skillset. He's essentially a jackrabbit that will have you grasping at air, IF he's in space.

So, why isn't he in the probowl every year? Why aren't the Saints sporting three sparkly football trophies? It's simple really, Sean Payton hasn't designed an offense for him. He may never. Reggie, like so many other players before him, may be forced to adapt to the NFL instead of the NFL adapting to him. 20 years from now, players like Bush may be the norm, but for now . . .

So why keep him? Because Sean Payton is very VERY close to a breakthrough. It's very evident simply because he hasn't asked Bush to change his style at all. He hasn't asked Bush to adapt (Except for running through the tackles). Sean Payton is looking for the full-proof way to get Bush the ball in space, facing downfield, with time to make magic happen. Not an easy task to undertake, but it is one that he seems to get closer and closer to as time progresses.

There are two givens whenever Bush is on the field: 1. Sean Payton is trying to get Bush into space. 2. Defenses are trying to keep Bush out of space. It's due to number 2 alone that he is such an effective decoy, but that is not why Sean is so in love with Bush.

Essentially, what Payton is looking for is a way to install a wingback type position in the NFL and make it successful. That's his mission, and it is DAUNTING. The effective employment of a secondary speed back that you must respect but can't focus on could be exactly the way to use Reggie and see those explosive plays everyone has been waiting for. I personally hope he finds a way to do so, because it would definitely be a fun thing to watch.

In the meantime, let's keep Reggie around. Give him his opportunities to electrify or infuriate (at least it's exciting). I for one would much rather pay him less and keep him, then ship him off somewhere else that was waiting for a Reggie Bush to install in "the next big thing".

Poll
What should the Saints do with Reggie Bush?
Trade him for draft picks or quality player.
17 votes
Restructure his contract.
73 votes
Allow him to play out his contract then resign him.
64 votes
Cut him.
3 votes

157 votes | Poll has closed

This FanPost was written by a reader and member of Canal Street Chronicles. It does not necessarily reflect the views of CSC and its staff or editors.

7 recs  |  Comment 247 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Great Post

I recd it because I enjoy reading well thought out concepts. Not sure if I agree somewhat or entirely, but I certainly think it has a lot of merit. Clearly it is too early to give up on Reggie. In January, we will have a better idea of where Reggie stands. Didn’t vote because 1) want to see how this season plays out- we don’t need to do anything now
2) couldn’t decide between the top two choices- assuming the decision would come after this season. Trading him would depend on what you get- every player has his price.

"Indecision may or may not be my biggest problem" - Jimmy Buffett

by Philinwood on Oct 17, 2009 7:35 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Good post and great point.

We can only hope Payton is getting closer. I think you might be right about Reggie being more effective because of our newly found run game.

Bringing families together through incorrect grammar and incoherent thoughts, don't mention it. It's what I do.

by asaint on Oct 17, 2009 7:46 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Nice Post

People are too criticat of Bush. He came into the league with unrealistic expectations and because he hasn’t met them they call him a “bust”. LIke you said, “he is a unique athlete” and putting him in a position where he can use the extraordinary skill set he has is not an easy job. Especially when defenses are keying on him when he’s on the field. It’s up to Payton to find ways to get him the ball in order to use those skills.

However, I don’t think returning punts is the way to do it. Every time he recieves a punt he reminds me of a squirrel that just ran out in front of your car and can’t decide which way to go. You know what happens then: SPLAT, no more squirrel. Rod Harper has proven in the pre-season he can be consistant at that position and I think we should give him a chance.

Will this be the year I finally get to pop this cork?

by dicecar18 on Oct 17, 2009 8:16 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Harper is no longer an option

They put him on the IR, I believe…

…plus, I disagree, Reggie can be useful on punts, but the opposing ST’s have learned how to set up to take the long returns away from him – directional kick to pin him on the sideline, and have the coverage team maintain their lanes to take the cutbacks away. That’s why he looks like a “squirrel”, he’s getting the ball and then realizing he’s got no openings, so he’s trying to create one by changing direction, hoping that someone “bites” on a move. So far, it hasn’t happened, but it will…

Eventually, someone will miss an assignment, a punter will mis-hit a punt, SOMETHING will give him the space he needs and he will HURT someone with a big return.

Irony: An atheist Saints fan.

by GSO Saints Fan on Oct 17, 2009 8:24 AM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

agreed

Other teams are working on limiting his returns just like they do with Devin Hester. The punt the ball higher and to the sideline. That’s not always going to be enough to contain Reggie if the ball doesn’t have enough hang time. Also, our blocking for that hasn’t done that good of a job so far for that.

Superbowl bound!!!...I know! do you?! Go Saints!!

by skinnykinney on Oct 17, 2009 4:32 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

yup...

after Monday night you think teams are just going to punt to him and hope he doesn’t return one. Nah son, there is strategy to punting to him these days. Does Hester still return punts?

Don't worry I got your back cuz...

by TAYDIGGA on Oct 17, 2009 7:54 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

we're on the same page skinney...

didn’t even see your post there until now.

Don't worry I got your back cuz...

by TAYDIGGA on Oct 17, 2009 7:55 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Imminent breakthrough?

Nice piece. I agree in a different time Reggie would have flourished against the slower defensive teams of the 60’s and 70’s…However, this team is rightfully being built around the arm of Drew Brees. The offensive lineman needed to elevate Reggie’s career in the style you suggest don’t exist on the Saints roster…neither do the slow defenses he would need to face.

Instead we have bruisers capable of straight-ahead blocking and decent pass protection and a league full of defensive players capable of tracking down the quickest of receivers and backs. Also, defenses today are drilled today to watch for the cutback move, which is where Bush made so much hay during his college years.

Peyton knows he can’t ask Bush to be a straight-ahead runner because he also very injury prone. He missed 4 games in 2007, 6 games in 2008 and started this year coming off another injury. I would argue it’s this fear of getting him hurt further, not being on the edge of a miraculous “breakthrough” as the reason we continue to run edge plays and screen passes for him.

If we’re serious about using his talents fully and extending his playing days we need to convert him into more of a pure WR while using him occasionally as a change-of-pace back and in wildcat formations. Train Bush to find and sit down in the weak spots of a zone defense and get him the ball there away from the line of scrimmage. Maybe then he would be more than an interesting footnote.

by TigerPaw on Oct 17, 2009 12:13 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

I have to disagree big time.

He’s not a WR. It takes a great deal more to become a good WR, you can’t just convert a RB and call it a day. A 3rd down runningback I agree with, but they want to give him the underneath balls, because he is main person on the roster that has a chance to break it. Why would you take Devery Henderson or Marques Colston and ask them to run the short route and send Reggie long. Seems like a waste to me. No, I think they use him fine in the passing game. They just need to mix it up better and not be so obvious in how they use him.

The people who say, "Winning isn't everything," don't win very often.

by Hooahsaint on Oct 17, 2009 12:43 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

He's been pretty impressive

this year as the 3RB. Obviously a bit too costly to just be that, but he is actually converting third and longs from the RB position.

"Brees will kill you, but he lets you decide how fast he tightens the garrote." -Chris Brown

by FuSoYa on Oct 17, 2009 12:58 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

The Gale Sayers comparisons are somewhat warranted, if you take into account the fact that his professional career was decimated by a series of knee injuries. I’m not so sure a 68 game career is what people had in mind, when they initially drew that parallel. If so, Reggie only needs to finish out this year and next to be out of the red. In the meantime, geaux Fromage Rouge.

"Paralyze resistance with persistence" -Woody Hayes

by coldpizza on Oct 17, 2009 2:43 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

I wonder

Who would play Kim Kardashian if they did a Reggie Bush movie?

The people who say, "Winning isn't everything," don't win very often.

by Hooahsaint on Oct 18, 2009 12:13 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Might I suggest Kirstie Alley for the posterior shots?

"Paralyze resistance with persistence" -Woody Hayes

by coldpizza on Oct 18, 2009 6:09 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

LOL, I think I almost died on that one.

The people who say, "Winning isn't everything," don't win very often.

by Hooahsaint on Oct 18, 2009 3:56 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

comical

Don't worry I got your back cuz...

by TAYDIGGA on Oct 17, 2009 7:57 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

disagree

this is the produce now or your gone league how long should we wait for a high priced first round draft pick to come around i say with the way greg williams is mixing up the defense and mixing in the 3-4 we need more linebackers so we trade him now and get what we can for him our offense is great with or with out him our defense is playing good i say we get them some more help

by simone219 on Oct 18, 2009 7:56 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Great Post.

I feel the same way about much of your post. Reggie is a lot of the reason for the success of this offense. Most plays that he is in you see anywhere from 2 to 4 players trying to key on him even if hes not their assignment. He makes them back up a step or cheat up, he moves the def. just being on the field.
   I really think people who want to get rid of him aren’t seeing these contributions.

He does need to work on ball security I won’t defend him on that account but he is a unique athlete and is a positive part of our offense over all I for one hope they keep him. Wanna have him on the other side of the ball against us and have to game plan for him???

Here's to a fresh Brees blowing in NOLA!!!

by ValientC on Oct 18, 2009 12:02 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

"Dancing Bush"

This guy has been here long enough ! He is only slightly decent on swing pass routes and dances too much. He tries tooo hard to make people miss instead of putting his head down and hitting someone. He cannot run through the line where EVERY other Saints running back can. Not a coincidence people. GET SOMEONE WORTH A DAMN FOR HIS TRADE.

Spencer B. Ardoin

by SAINTS #1 FAN on Oct 18, 2009 1:12 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

He was the only one to convert a 3rd and 1 today. That's a start.

The people who say, "Winning isn't everything," don't win very often.

by Hooahsaint on Oct 18, 2009 3:56 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Sure...

…that play might be part of the promotional video we send out to teams when attempting to get him out of here. Not many to choose from though. Only 24 yards from him the whole game.

by TigerPaw on Oct 18, 2009 4:37 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Dude had what 7 touches...

sporadic as heck and up until he got gang-tackled in the backfield for an 8 yard loss he was the only RB with a +4 avg.

Don't worry I got your back cuz...

by TAYDIGGA on Oct 18, 2009 8:57 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

How did he wind up 8 yards behind the line of scrimmage? Surely that has nothing to do with his productive style of running.

“What if they were in the wrong era of football? What if they didn’t have coaches that saw how to make the most of their abilities and levels of talent? What if Joe Montana was around in the 20s? What if Chuck Drulis didn’t have “Wildcat” Larry Wilson to execute his highly unconventional safety blitz, and it failed miserably? What if Randal Cunningham was benched for not staying in the pocket? How many other Joe Montanas, Larry Wilsons or Randal Cunninghams were out there playing in the wrong timeframe. How many players were so far ahead of their time, that they just weren’t utilized in such a way as to revolutionize the game?"

Please allow me to take a stab at these questions. Had these players so far ahead of their time that they weren’t able to be utilized properly, you would have never heard of them. There’s your answer. In fact, there may have actually BEEN players over the years who fit the EXACT bill you’re describing and we just don’t know about them. What it comes down to is “how precious is a hidden gem that is never found?”

Since we’re talking about hypothetical misfits, I won’t bother with a “Who’s Not” list of obscure athletes. What would be the point? All you could prossibly say is “he wasn’t anything special”, to which I’d reply “exactly … and that’s my point”. Talk about some damning evidence there. Almost Reggie Bush damning, if you don’t mind me saying.

Instead, let’s deal with the known and factual for just a sec. Couldn’t Bronko Nagurski have been twice as devastating running out of an I-formation, like Earl Campbell? What if he been used more of screen passes, like Mike Alstott? OMG, why did’t George Halas think to do that?!?!?!! And they call him a great coach.

Sure, they’re thought provoking points you raise, but how long does anyone sit around playing with a broken toy, hoping it becomes awesome someday? I don’t know about you, but if I saw a kid doing that for any extended period of time, I’d probably start to feel sorry for him and offer to buy him a new toy.

Not saying the new toy would be awesome, or even entertain the kid as much as the one he had, but at least it wouldn’t be BROKEN. Hell, it would be worth the few extra bucks out of my pocket, just to see the other kids in the neighborhood stop making fun of him. “BUT … BUT … it was a rocket ship! It could have flown to Mars! Dump trucks can’t fly to Mars!” Now now, Timmy. Let it go. Let it go.

"Paralyze resistance with persistence" -Woody Hayes

by coldpizza on Oct 18, 2009 10:07 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

How precious is a hidden gem that is never found?

That like one of those “If a tree falls in the forest” questions?

For the record, it wasn’t his style that caused the big loss, it was the fact that after he was getting pushed back he chose to keep his feet when he should have just gone down, then he would have gotted forward progress and only lost 1. It’s not like he started to run laterally and gave ground 8 yards.

Aside from that play he did well with the touches he had.

AND I HAD A BROKEN ROCKETSHIP, AND IT WAS AWESOME. Besides dump trucks can fly to Mars. Haven’t you seen Transformers?

The people who say, "Winning isn't everything," don't win very often.

by Hooahsaint on Oct 19, 2009 1:55 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

just answering the first question

The guy was hit 2 yards behind the line of scrimmage. He broke that tackle only to be mauled by the 3 other players that were getting to him at the time that he broke the tackle. 1 tackle in the backfield is not that bad. I do believe that Jacobs got hit for about a 6 yard loss on a toss to the outside. Maybe the Giants should trade him. I know that we are going to disagree on about 90% of things. I think that the biggest reason is because you are pessimistic(sp?). You are a true long term Saints fan. Won’t get your hopes up because I’m sure that you’ve had your heart broken on numerous occasions. I also don’t feel like you give credit that is deserved to players like our WR corps and some other players. That’s not the topic though.

Superbowl bound!!!...I know! do you?! Go Saints!!

by skinnykinney on Oct 19, 2009 6:19 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

“I do believe that Jacobs got hit for about a 6 yard loss on a toss to the outside. Maybe the Giants should trade him.”

I do believe that’s been a hot topic of discussion the past two seasons among Giants fans. He’s not exactly earning his keep, either.

"Paralyze resistance with persistence" -Woody Hayes

by coldpizza on Oct 20, 2009 7:37 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I saw about 4 big plays today...

where he was the decoy and the D bit hard! Get out of here with that crap Kittenfingers!

Don't worry I got your back cuz...

by TAYDIGGA on Oct 18, 2009 8:55 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Are you referring to the two yard run Pierre reeled off, after they faked a reverse to Bush? You’re right, I truly cannot fathom how any other back in the league could have contributed to such a befuddling bit of misdirection. KREG ….. BAM! The future of pro football.

"Paralyze resistance with persistence" -Woody Hayes

by coldpizza on Oct 18, 2009 9:29 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think he meant the Touchdown pass to Colston where the linebacker and safety cheated up on the swing pattern and left the corner on an island.

The people who say, "Winning isn't everything," don't win very often.

by Hooahsaint on Oct 19, 2009 1:57 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

coldpizza...

u try to hard man, everybody else seemed to know what I was talking about, maybe if you took a lil time off from being the obnoxious know-it-all and came down a lil’ you’d be able to see what everybody else saw…you think?

Don't worry I got your back cuz...

by TAYDIGGA on Oct 19, 2009 2:58 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

or

you could realize that the play I’m describing, as well as the 8 yard loss, happened also, equate that + the smattering of good to inconsistency, stop making excuses for the guy week-in, week-out and start discussing a viable long term solution to that problem … you think?

"Paralyze resistance with persistence" -Woody Hayes

by coldpizza on Oct 20, 2009 7:32 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

So...

I’m guessing that you think that Bush gets the same kind of attention as the other backs like PT and Bell? I’m going to have to strongly disagree with that. I’m just assuming with all that but it seems that way to me.

Superbowl bound!!!...I know! do you?! Go Saints!!

by skinnykinney on Oct 19, 2009 6:21 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

The Saints averaged more yards per offensive play after he was lost for the season last year. Who was the decoy responsible for that?

"Paralyze resistance with persistence" -Woody Hayes

by coldpizza on Oct 20, 2009 7:14 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I have nothing to gauge attention on, just as you don’t. Based on his own production and the production of others around him — i.e., when he’s in the lineup versus when he isn’t — I’d venture to say not enough additional attention to merit a roster spot.

"Paralyze resistance with persistence" -Woody Hayes

by coldpizza on Oct 20, 2009 7:35 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Okay

I agree with a lot of what you say on here, most actually. But he deserves a roster spot. That’s just crazy talk. To say he isn’t even worth third string consideration is a bit ridiculous. He should definitely be paid FAR less though.

The Saints averaged more yards per offensive play after he was lost for the season last year. Who was the decoy responsible for that?


I can’t agree with this either, although I doubt you were really stating that he doesn’t warrant so much attention but that no one can truly prove that he is as effective a decoy as he’s made out to be.

Fact is, too many things could have led to the number differential, weaker teams, good days from the line/quarterback, bad days from the defense. Any number of factors. The only way to really judge any of this would be for someone to go back and analyze each individual play and see how the defense reacts to him versus our other running backs. I have done a little bit of it, and I’m noticing lately that it’s starting to balance out more. Defenses are respecting PT more and he’s warranting the same attention, just not in the passing game. One thing that did stand out, however, is that defenses circle Bush and trap him as opposed to running downhill at him. If he doesn’t shed the dancing a bit and start taking off, he’s never going to be relevant again.

The people who say, "Winning isn't everything," don't win very often.

by Hooahsaint on Oct 20, 2009 8:39 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Wow, I botched that.

The people who say, "Winning isn't everything," don't win very often.

by Hooahsaint on Oct 20, 2009 8:39 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I suggest cutting him and picking up someone competent in Special Teams.

Lot less money, a lot more production.

Chief Stalker/ Lead Paparazzi of the official Matty I Fan Club

Knowshon Moreno is actually the illegitimate chocolate son of Dan Marino. Its true!!! I have pictures!!!

Bender: Who wants dolphin? Leela: Dolphin? But dolphins are intelligent. Bender: Not this one. He blew all his money on instant lottery tickets.

Mike Singletary- "Our formula is this: We go out and hit people in the mouth."

by Farorefox on Oct 21, 2009 8:30 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

whoa!

“picking up someone competent in Special Teams” Are you serious? Are you watching the games? Have you seen 1) teams kicking it to the sidelines 2) the blocking 3) He’s shown how great he can be (minnesota?) and is feared. The do the same to Hester. U are trippin!

Don't worry I got your back cuz...

by TAYDIGGA on Oct 21, 2009 1:25 PM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

A couple of slight differences. Hester is an offensive starter and has contributed 12.9 yds per touch on offense this season. Bush is a backup and has contributed 5.1. And before you jump back on that “can’t compare a RB to a WR” horse, do realize that Bush only has 5 less receptions. He’s also averaging a paltry 3.9 yds per punt return, to Hester’s 12.9. Nothing terribly special in either case, but a far cry from one another. Keep in mind, this is a DB that was converted into PR, then into a WR that we’re talking about. Yet, he’s still outperforming Bush in every facet of the game. He was also drafted in the 2nd round. And the Bears were ridiculed for taking him that high, because he was so one dimensional. Kind of like Houston was ridiculed for taking Mario Williams over Bush. The Minnesota game was an entire knee surgery ago, btw. Let’s talk turkey. What has Bush done in ’09?

"Paralyze resistance with persistence" -Woody Hayes

by coldpizza on Oct 22, 2009 2:05 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Comparison

Once again u can’t compare a deap threat wr to a screen pass wr. U don’t get it.

by ReggieVilma on Oct 23, 2009 12:19 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

NO

Hes talking about the TD pass to Colston! and i think it was Reggie in on the play action to Moore.

by ReggieVilma on Oct 19, 2009 12:29 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

That's the second time that exact play has worked

  Colston’s first TD in Philly was off the exact same play, with Reggie motioning from the slot to the tail, which brought up the safety, and let Colston come out uncovered in the endzone. I honestly don’t know if any other back would draw that kind of look on a presnap motion PA, but it’s clear that the Saints this year are using PA brilliantly.

  Even at his current level of production, I would love them to keep Bush past this year. But he is definitely not worth the money he’s getting, and he’d be the most valuable trade option of our skill players that seem expendable, probably(maybe Devery). He would have been Shockey-valuable last year/offseason, but there’s still a lot of football left this season, and I expect his number will be called heavily at some point this season still. He and Moore are the two guys that have to appear overvalued the most, looking ahead to upcoming contracts, so I doubt he’s going to get a ton of chances this season to shine, but he’s already had enough, and we know exactly how great he really is. It’s not that great, but he brings some pretty interesting wrinkles with him. I think he will be forced, fairly or not, to either get cheaper or leave this coming offseason.

"Brees will kill you, but he lets you decide how fast he tightens the garrote." -Chris Brown

by FuSoYa on Oct 19, 2009 10:19 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Correction: he motioned from offset back to tail in NYG game. Still, the motion worked the same on both.

"Brees will kill you, but he lets you decide how fast he tightens the garrote." -Chris Brown

by FuSoYa on Oct 19, 2009 10:20 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I view him as an overutilized version of Jerious Norwood. If he was making Norwood money, I’d still have a problem with how often he’s being used as a traditional RB. If he was effective in that role, I wouldn’t have a problem with him at all. So, it basically boils down to Reggie’s shortcomings at the position he plays, the money Reggie makes and the utilization of Reggie. That may not be ALL Reggie’s fault, just as our decision to draft him, without first having a finely tuned stratagem on how to utilize him to his fullest potential wasn’t. Then again, maybe they HAVE used him to his fullest potential. “Potential” in and of itself, lends itself to a plethora of ambiguity, excuses, theories and interpretation. “Kinetic” on the other had, is pretty cut and dried. Norwood is who he is. Michael Bennett is who he is. Trung Canidate was who he was. These are backs with similiar skill sets who are/were judged at face value without a moment’s hesitation. You want national recognition? I’m sure Bush rolling his eyes at his own undoing isn’t exactly winning over legions of new fans. Sure, everyone loves an underdog, but how many people love an underachieving chump? There’s a fine line there and he’s walking it. Maybe right off into the sunset.

"Paralyze resistance with persistence" -Woody Hayes

by coldpizza on Oct 19, 2009 11:01 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I pretty much agree here

I’m not in love with Bush, but he IS effective a fair percent of the time he’s used this year, and I would contend that it’s the right amount of time/plays. Otherwise, we could get better value out of tons of other guys. That guy, Charles, #25 at KC, looks like a Bush clone, and I would imagine he costs a fraction. I watched the Bears/Falcons game last night, and it turns out Chicago’s got their own low-rent Reggie, too. Those guys are all over the place, and their value originates from their use(read:the play packages they are involved in). Ours just costs way too much. And if we gave up entirely on the (extraneous?)notion of having Reggie-esque player on the roster, we could probably sucker some other team out of a solid defensive starter for the future. Then, we could simply bring Hill up from PS, and shuffle between him and Hamilton on activation.

P.S. Trung Candidate?! It’s awesome that you could pull that name out of the warehouse of forgotten players with silly names.

"Brees will kill you, but he lets you decide how fast he tightens the garrote." -Chris Brown

by FuSoYa on Oct 19, 2009 12:03 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I really think,

as much as I like PT and Bell, that Reggie is the only RB on our team that would have scored on the TD run he had. He does turn the corner well. He is very talented. We are winning, and doing so impressively. Sean Payton is doing a great job. It’s a little sad that Reggie is not putting up record-breaking stats, but THE SAINTS are, so I’m ok with that. If Reggie was not on this team, it would mean we have one less offensive weapon. That would be bad. The only problem with having so many weapons is that someone, on any given week, who has awesome talent, will not be in the headlines or the limelight. I’m ok with that. And I hope the Saints can contionue to be ok with that. too.

"Indecision may or may not be my biggest problem" - Jimmy Buffett

by Philinwood on Oct 19, 2009 1:25 AM CDT reply actions   1 recs

“If Reggie was not on this team, it would mean we have one less offensive weapon.”

I seriously doubt that. We’d likely sign or promote a 4th RB or 6th WR to take his place. They just wouldn’t carry the same name recognition, salary or boom-or-bust performance portfolio. P.J. Hill or Adrian Arrington would probably be given active roster consideration, though a pure power back to better complement Bell and Thomas could also be a viable option during the offseason.

"Paralyze resistance with persistence" -Woody Hayes

by coldpizza on Oct 19, 2009 1:42 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

One thing's for certain

He keeps getting only 7 touches a game, he won’t be around next season.

And did I hear Aikman mentioning the Saints should convert Bush to wide receiver?

1. I don’t care what the stats say, Bush is like 5’10’’ or 5’11’’ tops.

2.His speed matches up well on linebackers, but it’s nothing special to NFL cornerbacks.

3. He doesn’t run particularly good routes (I’m inclined to think that’s why he and Drew are having such a tough time hooking up on those passes in the flat)

4. People spend their entire football careers through Pop Warner, High School, College and into the Pros playing Wide Receiver and still take three years to start, and Bush is expected to just switch over with no issues?

5. He has great hands for a running back, but probably just average or less by wide receiver standards.

6. Who in their right mind would start Bush at receiver over Colston, Moore, Henderson or Meachum? You can’t honestly believe he’s a better receiver than any of them.

7. Conversion = waste. Either they find a way to utilize him as a running back or hybrid type role or move on.

The people who say, "Winning isn't everything," don't win very often.

by Hooahsaint on Oct 19, 2009 2:09 AM CDT reply actions   1 recs

“Either they find a way to utilize him as a running back or hybrid type role or move on.”

I vote for the latter.

"Paralyze resistance with persistence" -Woody Hayes

by coldpizza on Oct 19, 2009 10:33 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

"We could promote a 4th RB or a 6th WR" - why would we want to

but we are WINNING- with this recipe. Our game plan is so incredibly flexible. We are in this zone where if we don’t have Bell, we use Thomas. If we don’t have Moore, we use Henderson. We have Reggie and we could actually get by without him. But why would we want to? He contributes. He gets first downs, he gets touchdowns. He draws attention in play action and makes linebackers worryt if he might be too fast for them and make them look silly in the open field. Okay, he makes tons of money, but that is Mr. Benson’s problem. And next year??? Who cares, all I want to do is get to the SB, win it this year, and then address next year after that. If we start worrying about next year during this year, we will sabotage this year. Mark my words, by season end we will see why having R Bush is a good idea. we are already seeing it if you look close, but by season’s end it will be crystal clear.

"Indecision may or may not be my biggest problem" - Jimmy Buffett

by Philinwood on Oct 19, 2009 7:28 AM CDT reply actions   1 recs

A award-winning chocolate chip cookie recipe might call for a pinch of salt. That doesn’t mean you have to include that pinch of salt to make a delicious batch of cookies. It’s the same thing with Bush. Why would we want to promote a 4th RB or a 6th WR, if we got rid of Bush? For purposes of depth, of course. That was in direct response to your "If Reggie was not on this team, it would mean we have one less offensive weapon" statement. That isn’t true. They’d replace him with another offensive weapon. One likely just as effective in the big picture and far less expensive. “If we start worrying about next year during this year, we will sabotage this year.” I fail to see the corrulation. I also view Bush’s presence in the backfield as more of a liability than an asset. I honestly believe we’d be a better team, if he was gone today. Not at the end of the season. Today. Tomorrow is the NFL trade deadline. Move him to the highest bidder. If there are no takers, cut your losses. “Mark my words, by season end we will see why having R Bush is a good idea.” I’ve been hearing that for over three years now. Trade him to Cleveland for Josh Cribbs. At least then we’ll have a productive punt returner.

"Paralyze resistance with persistence" -Woody Hayes

by coldpizza on Oct 19, 2009 10:30 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

trade

i say trade him to a team that will give us another quality linebacker

by simone219 on Oct 19, 2009 10:49 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah, I’d like either a defensive up-and-comer, or some high draft picks. A solid OLB or another DT would be awesome.

"Brees will kill you, but he lets you decide how fast he tightens the garrote." -Chris Brown

by FuSoYa on Oct 19, 2009 10:52 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Agreed. It doesn’t seem like KC is too big on Jamaal Charles and Larry Johnson isn’t getting any younger. Maybe they’d be willing to go Derrick Johnson or Glenn Dorsey straight up. Not saying I’m terribly excited about either one of those guys, but I honestly can’t imagine landing a player without their own litany of question marks in a Bush swap.

"Paralyze resistance with persistence" -Woody Hayes

by coldpizza on Oct 19, 2009 11:12 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

To Pittsburgh for either Lawrence Timmons or Mewelde Moore seems to make quite a bit of sense for both teams, also. A Bush/Mendenhall tandem would likely be the closest he’s ever going to come to USC revisited at the pro level.

"Paralyze resistance with persistence" -Woody Hayes

by coldpizza on Oct 19, 2009 11:16 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

You know Payton's not going to give him up.

The people who say, "Winning isn't everything," don't win very often.

by Hooahsaint on Oct 19, 2009 12:00 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Charles+Dorsey

for Bush+Clancy(+4th or 5th rounder?) would be sweet. Don’t know what kind of money those guys want, though, and KC would have to be retarded to take the fire sale that far.

"Brees will kill you, but he lets you decide how fast he tightens the garrote." -Chris Brown

by FuSoYa on Oct 19, 2009 12:07 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

A award-winning chocolate chip cookie recipe might call for a pinch of salt. That doesn’t mean you have to include that pinch of salt to make a delicious batch of cookies

Salt is an essential ingredient in the development of almost any type of bread. It corrects the leavening process. You cannot make a proper chocolate chip cookie without a pinch of salt. Metaphorically speaking.

"Brees will kill you, but he lets you decide how fast he tightens the garrote." -Chris Brown

by FuSoYa on Oct 19, 2009 10:56 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

You’re preaching to a guy who eats raw cookie dough for a living.

"Paralyze resistance with persistence" -Woody Hayes

by coldpizza on Oct 19, 2009 11:04 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Metaphorically, of course.

"Paralyze resistance with persistence" -Woody Hayes

by coldpizza on Oct 19, 2009 11:05 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I didn't see the Stats

But not many players in the skill positions are going to see more than 7 touches other than PT or Bell in this offense so what’s your point. Winning is winning who gives a shit on who gets the most touches.

by Lyle Lirette on Oct 19, 2009 9:37 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Trade Bush? For what?

If Reggie is so much of a liability in the backfield, so unproductive, and so expensive, what makes any of you that want him traded think that the Saints would get anything decent in return? If he’s as bad as coldpizza thinks, I doubt they could get a 4th round pick for him. Trade him for Dorsey? Yeah, right. I don’t think even the Chiefs front office is that stupid (though they seem hell bent on trying to prove it with some of their selections recently).

IMHO, the only problem with Reggie is the money. But when you consider his contract, you have to accept the fact that he was drafted 2nd overall, and that’s what determines rookie contracts. Even if his contract were restructured, it would only serve to move money around, e.g., from salary to bonus. He’ll still be getting the same total in the end. Once his contract is up in a couple of years, then, yes, this conversation is worth having, but right now it seems kind of silly.

by HB-NOLA on Oct 19, 2009 12:55 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

You're probably 100% right.

I wouldn’t trade him unless it were for defensive starters or great draft picks, which he probably won’t get. The Chiefs may really be stupid enough to bite on an unbalanced trade for him. Also, see Raiders or Redskins, though I’m not sure what we’d want from either that they’d give up. And, bottom line, the likeliest course of action on him is none. But the Saints’ need or use for him dwindles with each passing year/game, and somebody out there will still think he’s the answer to all their woes. He is quite good.

"Brees will kill you, but he lets you decide how fast he tightens the garrote." -Chris Brown

by FuSoYa on Oct 19, 2009 1:13 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

There’s a sucker born every minute. There are also quite a few other players in the NFL, that I honestly can’t understand what their respective GMs see in them. Maybe there’s a head coach out there more creative than Sean Payton. One that can come up with a way to better utilize his unseen otherworldliness. Sean’s not doing it and that’s all that really matters on this end of the stick. We traded our top receiver in 2005 for a backup MLB and a 4th rounder. If Bush somehow holds more value than that, toss in a relatively young long snapper with a cannon for a wrist and call it a meal deal. Or cut him. At this point, I don’t care. Donte Stallworth was averaging over 13 yards per touch and we seemed to recover just fine from that piss away move. What’s to say we can’t do it again?

"Paralyze resistance with persistence" -Woody Hayes

by coldpizza on Oct 19, 2009 1:28 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Totally agree

One man’s trash is another man’s treasure. If you’re loaded at one position, it’s worth it to trade away someone for a player of lesser value at a position of need where they would be an upgrade.

In Madden terms, trade an 80 RB for a 70 LB if all your other LBs are 60s . . . minus Vilma of course.

I’m not ready to trade him yet, though. In the offseason, if it’s another lackluster year I may be. But not yet.

The people who say, "Winning isn't everything," don't win very often.

by Hooahsaint on Oct 20, 2009 8:45 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

well said

i guess since we are 5-0 i should give reggie a break i wouldnt want to do anything to mess up our chemistry i just have worries about our linebackers our starters are fine (could use a little upgrading) i just cant wonder what greg williams could do if we had an outside linebacker like lance briggs or sean merriman to bring in when he switched up to a 3-4 defense we are playing great defense but were still giving up over 20 points a game

by simone219 on Oct 20, 2009 8:49 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Statistically

I think there are a lot of valid points being made. Personally, I don’t trust Reggie. He drops the ball too often, fumbles too often, runs backwards too often and is never ever willing to take a hit for an extra yard or two. But, beyond all of that, statistically, in the most simple of terms, yards per carry, yards per catch and yards per punt return, Reggie is forth or worse in every category.

Yards per run – 3.9 behind bell, thomas, hamilton and meachem
Yards per catch – 8.5 behind colston, shockey, moore, meachem, bell, henderson and dave thomas
Yards per punt return – 3.9. He is the only one to return a punt this year, but opponents are average 12 yards against us, so it clearly is not too impressive a number.
And as a blocker – nothing special. Certainly aint no darnell dinkins.

Basically, my feeling is that he is a liability because not only is he not trustworthy, he is also producing less than pretty much every other player being utilized the same way. I feel like we have given him long enough to asses potential versus actual and the actual just aint that good. Just like Billy Beane figured out about baseball, a player is only worth what his stats show. And Reggie, statistically speaking, shouldn’t be on our depth charts as a runner, receiver or punt returner.

All the potential in the world, and $1.50, will get you a bus ride across town. And I just don’t buy this decoy crap. He, like every other player, gets picked up by a defender on every play. No more, no less. They don’t assign their best linebacker or anyone else special to him and they certainly don’t double team him. We just talked about how he has virtually no trade value whatsoever. The myth of Reggie and his breakout potential is exactly that…. a myth, and nobody is believing it anymore other than Reggie, Kim and maybe his momma.

Thats my final word on Reggie. Trade him (if anyone wants him), drop him, but don’t bother restructuring.

by jamaican drew brees on Oct 19, 2009 2:07 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Whoa whoa whoa

Bush doesn’t drop the ball very often at all. He’s got great hands for a running back.

And I don’t see all this shying away from contact thing either. I see him try to juke a bit too often instead of lower his shoulder, but I think that’s borne of football immaturity as opposed to fear of contact.

Of course his yards per catch is lower then TEs and WRs. He IS a running back. Can’t argue with Bell though. He had some awesome screen receptions.

Also, for punt returns, he’s proven his worth in the past and then some. It’s pretty obvious that the blocking has not been good at all. He catches and attempts to run a lot of returns that others would have fair caught. The one or two times he has had a bit of blocking he’s broken off pretty good returns.

The people who say, "Winning isn't everything," don't win very often.

by Hooahsaint on Oct 20, 2009 8:53 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

you're crazy!

Don't worry I got your back cuz...

by TAYDIGGA on Oct 19, 2009 3:13 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Has there been any talk about just making Bush a receiver? Just take away all RB duties and make him a receiver. At least then he can’t be getting as many negative plays or fumbles (hopefully). Try to get something out of the money the Saints are paying him.

by theaxeeffect4721 on Oct 19, 2009 5:42 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Line him up at WR

Payton is a formation guy, we’ve seen him out there as a decoy, a lot more last season, not much this yr. so far, line him up as a WR and actually throw to him !

You think you know, and you don't know, and you never, ever will.-Jim Mora Sr.

by metryman on Oct 19, 2009 8:41 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

As a true receiver, he'd be fifth string.

The people who say, "Winning isn't everything," don't win very often.

by Hooahsaint on Oct 20, 2009 8:54 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I’d rather lure Beerman out of retirement @ minimum wage.

"Paralyze resistance with persistence" -Woody Hayes

by coldpizza on Oct 20, 2009 9:51 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I feel you, there’s just not a lot of upside in converting a short RB to WR.

The people who say, "Winning isn't everything," don't win very often.

by Hooahsaint on Oct 20, 2009 11:28 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Lots of short CB's too

You think you know, and you don't know, and you never, ever will.-Jim Mora Sr.

by metryman on Oct 20, 2009 10:43 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

All about match-ups

find a good one and torch him… Jason David style

You think you know, and you don't know, and you never, ever will.-Jim Mora Sr.

by metryman on Oct 20, 2009 10:44 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I just think you guys are overlooking what Reggie has accomplished...

because he makes so much money. He gains rushing yards, he catches passes, when he was teamed up with Deuce it was an awesome twosome, and early last year he was on fire- leading the league in TD receptions before he got hurt. He certainly was important in our only NFC championship game even if though we lost ( and I will admit I really thought his taunting Urlacher was a bad move in that game). But, he was a big factor. I was at the Eagles game when his19 yd td run broke their back. And then last game when he again was almost an afterthought, he comes through with a td run that no one else on our team could have made. And that broke the Giants backs- we were only up by 10 points at that point and this changed the whole game- we go into the locker room with a TD and a 17pt lead at halftime. No one seemed to notice, but that DESTROYED the Giants. They had a lot less hope because remember they could have been down 10, had gotten momentum if they stopoped us, and receiving the kickoff to start the half instead they had a 17 pt deficit and no hope of stopping our offense.

The problem with this season ( and it’s really NOT a problem- everyone just keeps trying to make it a problem) is that we have a mutitude of weapons. So none on the team, NONE ONE…is putting up the numbers that they would put up if we got rid of 2-3 weapons. Look- last year Moore had a breakout season- but there was no Meachem and there was no Bush for part of it and there was an injured Shockey, injured Colston part of the season, no Bell, etc. So Moore went to town and put up career stats because he was a weapon on a team that had a lot less weaponry. There is only one football. You guys have to get used to winning. This is what can happen. Individual goals are sacrificed in the name of team goals and you get WINS. So get used to Reggie doing what Reggie does. He helps us win. He won’t make the Pro Bowl. I know people who make his kind of money should put up Pro Bowl numbers. But his money issues are Mr Benson’s problems because we don’t need LBs, or Safeteies or WRs or Ols, or QBs. WE HAVE IT ALL. We could add someone like Terrell Suggs tomorrow and it might all turn sour, or Orlando Pace or Knowshon Moreno. Why, so we can, what….win by more points. Have a better record right now than 5-0??? Get straight here, enjoy the 5-0 soon to be 6-0. Leave Reggie alone, Payton has it under control. Suppose we got rid of Reggie tomorrow and then we lose to the Dolphins and it had nothing, zero, zilch to do with letting Reggie go? Everyone would freak and second guess and then this great chemistry would be a big mess and ther would be chaos and self doubt and bitterness, etc. At least now we keep rolling, win or lose, with a roster tht we KNOW can beat the other good teams in the NFC. We already know that. And that, gentleman, is how you get to the Superbowl. Let’s not ruin it.

"Indecision may or may not be my biggest problem" - Jimmy Buffett

by Philinwood on Oct 19, 2009 11:55 PM CDT reply actions   1 recs

“NONE ONE…is putting up the numbers that they would put up if we got rid of 2-3 weapons.”

I’m not even sure what “none one” means, but I’m not suggesting that we get rid of 2-3 weapons. I’m suggesting we replace the ONE (possibly the opposite of “none one”) that isn’t cutting the mustard. Replace as in “net zero”. Break even. Save money. Cut losses. Not difficult.

“he comes through with a td run that no one else on our team could have made.”

He raced for the the pylon and managed to slip in untouched. Didn’t Ricky Williams do the same thing ten years ago with no time left on the clock? Any number of NFL backs have the speed to turn the corner from a yard out. If Pierre Thomas and Mike Bell can’t do it, sign someone a little quicker. If there’s no one available, call another play. Nice play, but it’s not like you’re limited to sweeps on 2nd and goal with a time out at your disposal.

"Paralyze resistance with persistence" -Woody Hayes

by coldpizza on Oct 20, 2009 7:26 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Another play

Like the two stalled goal line runs by pt and bell? That didn’t work. So try some outside stuff with ur speed back that does. Open up u(and I will use your favorite word) hater.

by ReggieVilma on Oct 20, 2009 3:35 PM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

lol

rec’d it

Don't worry I got your back cuz...

by TAYDIGGA on Oct 20, 2009 7:23 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

oh, and getting rid of Stallworth was the best move the Saints ever made

he is, was and always will be a fraud.

"Indecision may or may not be my biggest problem" - Jimmy Buffett

by Philinwood on Oct 19, 2009 11:59 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

A fraud who averaged more yards per play than Reggie Bush.

"Paralyze resistance with persistence" -Woody Hayes

by coldpizza on Oct 20, 2009 7:10 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

LOL, what's he averaging now?

The people who say, "Winning isn't everything," don't win very often.

by Hooahsaint on Oct 20, 2009 9:13 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

im liking your thinking these days...

at least your not bashing Reggie. like the rest of these “fans” are. Nice post.

Don't worry I got your back cuz...

by TAYDIGGA on Oct 20, 2009 4:00 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Don't take it personally dude

His play leaves a lot of room for speculation. I like him, and I wish it didn’t, but it does. I think he could have a second life like Marshall Faulk somewhere(maybe even here), but his first four years have been a rollercoaster, production and availability-wise.

"Brees will kill you, but he lets you decide how fast he tightens the garrote." -Chris Brown

by FuSoYa on Oct 20, 2009 7:17 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Seriously, though.

Everyone wants to trade him? Why? He’s essentially third string right now. If he’s happy with that and willing to take less money, why get rid of him? I really don’t see how you can argue that he isn’t a great 3rd down back.

The people who say, "Winning isn't everything," don't win very often.

by Hooahsaint on Oct 20, 2009 9:00 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

"and willing to take less money"

That’s the crux, I think.

"Paralyze resistance with persistence" -Woody Hayes

by coldpizza on Oct 20, 2009 9:03 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Put up low numbers, get low $$$. Just the way it is. Having a ring and the potential for future ones is another thing to consider. I think he’ll be happy to stay for less money.

The people who say, "Winning isn't everything," don't win very often.

by Hooahsaint on Oct 20, 2009 9:13 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

If he'll take the less money...

Keep him. He IS a great 3rd down back, and he does have a place in the equation, but he’s obviously gotten the better end of his rookie contract. If he wants to stay here as a supporting cast member and give up some cap space towards the defensive side, that would be fine by me. Hard to say what he thinks he’s worth at this point, though. He could be a big thing in Pittsburgh, though, but all the Saints could use from them(equal to Bush) would be high draft picks. I’d rather keep Bush.

"Brees will kill you, but he lets you decide how fast he tightens the garrote." -Chris Brown

by FuSoYa on Oct 20, 2009 9:09 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Do you not like Mewelde? Baton Rouge native, played for Tulane in the Dome. I think he’d be a little bit of an upgrade on a straight up swap. Not sure if Tomlin would be willing to part with him, though. I like Lawrence Timmons and LaMarr Woodley, too. Timmons can play both inside and outside, so he gives you the flexibility you lost in Simoneau, along with considerably more athleticism. The likelihood of landing either one of those two is probably even less, but they’re all guys I’d be interested in. Ike Taylor and Ryan Clark (both New Orleans natives) are a couple of other slightly less attractive options, imo. We could also talk OL depth, though I can’t see landing much in the way of exceptional value there through a trade. Maybe if we bundled Jammal Brown (who we’re probably going to lose in free agency after the season anyway) in on the deal, someone would be a bit more willing to roll the dice. Only problem with that approach is we’re not likely to be in any sort of position to recoup a franchise LT in the draft. Not sure who else is about to shake loose there in UFA. It’s an area of upper-mid level concern IMO, regardless.

"Paralyze resistance with persistence" -Woody Hayes

by coldpizza on Oct 20, 2009 9:47 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Timmons would be cool, if they would do that. Not sure they’d go for that, but I’d be okay with it. I’m not overly fond of Moore. I like the hometown aspect of him, but that’s about it. Not to say that wouldn’t be a good idea, in the cash-value sense. I don’t think it would be a significant loss in talent, but Moore isn’t that enticing in my mind. It would be a wash, talent-wise, best case, and I’d rather keep Reggie for less.

The way the line’s playing now, I think drafting high at LT will be sufficient, barring any serious injuries. I don’t know what will be available, but I find myself trusting Loomis and Payton with OL drafting very much these days.

I don’t know two things about Woodley, but from the little Steelers ball I’ve watched recently, Timmons would be the only real exciting prospect to me.

"Brees will kill you, but he lets you decide how fast he tightens the garrote." -Chris Brown

by FuSoYa on Oct 20, 2009 11:05 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Didn’t both Moore and Sharper play a role in the Vikings’ coochie cruise scandal a few years back? I had completely forgot about that, until just now.

"Paralyze resistance with persistence" -Woody Hayes

by coldpizza on Oct 20, 2009 11:51 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

One of the biggest

reasons Reggie got soooooo much hype in college, is because he attended a school with enough talent at RB to afford him the opportunities to do the things he does (or did) so well. By contrast, consider Michael Bennett, who would have been Deuce’s backup, had the Saints not drafted Reggie. He’s also a former first round pick with just as much speed as Bush, decent hands out of the backfield, a history of injury problems at the pro level, etc. The primary difference, at least in my mind, stems from the way they were utilized at university. Bennett was the featured back at Wisconsin. What head coach in their right mind is going to risk injury to someone that integral to their offense, by having them return punts? With opportunity comes success, with success comes the spotlight, with the spotlight comes the hype. In Bush’s case, it’s been a bittersweet pill to swallow at the next level. Bitter because he’s destined to play his entire career in the shadow of his former self, a shadow littered with unrealistic expectations, comparisons to fellows with bronze busts in Canton, etc. Sweet because he still has his own special piece of bronze hardware to show for the chances he was given. Not that the latter means a hill of beans nowadays. Although, I guess he could always pawn his Heisman to offset some of the money he’s going to lose on his next contract. Either that or use some of the cash USC paid him to dazzle, way back when.

"Paralyze resistance with persistence" -Woody Hayes

by coldpizza on Oct 20, 2009 9:23 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

He could also pawn his pretty diamond earrings. Not sure how I overlooked those.

"Paralyze resistance with persistence" -Woody Hayes

by coldpizza on Oct 20, 2009 9:25 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

With all the endorsements, I doubt he's worried about money.

The people who say, "Winning isn't everything," don't win very often.

by Hooahsaint on Oct 20, 2009 11:27 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Good point.

"Paralyze resistance with persistence" -Woody Hayes

by coldpizza on Oct 20, 2009 11:48 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

the dude is sensible enough to be chill now...

but for the sake of his career he’ll want to leave this off-season, unless Payton starts utilizing him more later in the season.

Don't worry I got your back cuz...

by TAYDIGGA on Oct 20, 2009 1:26 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

but with 7 touches the last few games...

I wouldn’t be surprised if they are thinking of trading the kid…

Don't worry I got your back cuz...

by TAYDIGGA on Oct 20, 2009 1:36 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Michael Bennet would have....

could have…..I don’t have the faintest clue why his name came up. He was in the league for 5 years before Reggie arrived. Don’t see how he would have been Deuce’s backup, he was pretty mediocre. Reggie was never Deuce’s backup. Let’s be real. Reggie had 1300 yds combined rushing and receiving his rookie year playing part time. Bennett had one good year, back 4 years before Reggie arrived and was washed up by 2006, having shown only a glimmer of his one seasons potential. Everyone forgets so fast.

"Indecision may or may not be my biggest problem" - Jimmy Buffett

by Philinwood on Oct 20, 2009 6:07 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

You don’t have the faintest clue? Because they’re practically the same underachieving back. They have nearly identical skill sets. All speed, no vision. Bennett had one good year. How many has Reggie had? How many 1000 yard rushing seasons? How many 100 yard games? How many seasons OR games with over 4.0 yards per carry? What does it matter how long Bennett was playing before Bush came into the league? Does that somehow void the comparison? Gale Sayers retired 35 years before Bush entered the NFL. I don’t remember anyone shying away from that ridiculous comparison. Line those three up side-by-side-by-side statistically and tell me which is least like the other two. Reggie was never Deuce’s backup? Hmm. Then what would you classify him as in the eight games he didn’t start as a rookie? I don’t disagree with you that Bennett was pretty mediocre. That’s one of the main reasons I made the comparison to begin with.

"Paralyze resistance with persistence" -Woody Hayes

by coldpizza on Oct 21, 2009 12:18 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

how are you going to get 1000 yards...

with 10 carries a game, and when you’re injured? You don’t have the faintest clue do you? Injuries, you can’t help that. He didn’t end up on the right team to live up to that. No vision? Ugh, you gotta have great vision to make the cuts he makes. He may not have the power, or the patience, I’ll concede that. But the vision, lol!

Don't worry I got your back cuz...

by TAYDIGGA on Oct 21, 2009 1:29 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

What cuts? You don’t need great vision to break it to the outside. The guy has the directional repertoire of a tetherball. Anyone with a functioning pair of eyes can see that.

"Paralyze resistance with persistence" -Woody Hayes

by coldpizza on Oct 22, 2009 12:41 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Stallworth is a fraud- look at his career stats- I don't even think he catches more than 3 passes per game

and makes millions. He’s a fraud. He was #4 receiver on the Patriots by the end of his season there and the Eagles figured out he was lame real fast too. He can run 2 routes.

"Indecision may or may not be my biggest problem" - Jimmy Buffett

by Philinwood on Oct 20, 2009 6:09 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

When Stallworth

was a Saint for every 1 pass he caught, he dropped 3.

You think you know, and you don't know, and you never, ever will.-Jim Mora Sr.

by metryman on Oct 20, 2009 11:03 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

And STILL managed to put up more yards per touch than Bush? Wow. Maybe we should look into trading Reggie to Cleveland for his rights next season.

"Paralyze resistance with persistence" -Woody Hayes

by coldpizza on Oct 21, 2009 1:01 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

How about you look at his career stats? There was only one season as a Saint where he DIDN’T catch more than three passes per game. He reeled in 70 in 2005. Only seven other WRs in Saints history have caught more in a single season. Not that any of that matters. The point being, he was by far the best WR on the roster that season and Payton gave him away to the Eagles for next to nothing. Did it hurt them? Probably in some ways, being that Colston tapered off down the stretch, they wound up spending another #1 pick on a WR, etc. But for the most part, they walked away unscathed. At least that’s what you would argue, correct? Well, if that’s the case, what’s wrong with moving our 5th best WR and/or 3rd best RB now for whatever we can get for him now? Stallworth circa 2005 = 59.25 yds/game. Bush circa 2009 = 58.6 yds/game. You don’t even want me to breakdown their per touch average. Is net yardage somehow worth more when you dance the jitterbug? If Stallworth was a fraud then, what does that make Bush today? A sub-fraud?

"Paralyze resistance with persistence" -Woody Hayes

by coldpizza on Oct 21, 2009 12:49 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I don't want Stallworth in NOLA.

My Mom and Dad walk a lot. I’d like to keep them around a few more years :D

The people who say, "Winning isn't everything," don't win very often.

by Hooahsaint on Oct 21, 2009 1:12 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Just for the record:

All-purpose yards, career

Reggie Bush = 3987 on 751 touches (5.31 avg)
Donte Stallworth = 4708 on 335 touches (14.05 avg)

Who dat fraud? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAAAA!!!

"Paralyze resistance with persistence" -Woody Hayes

by coldpizza on Oct 21, 2009 1:00 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Oh come on, half those touches are rushes. You can't compare that.

The people who say, "Winning isn't everything," don't win very often.

by Hooahsaint on Oct 21, 2009 1:13 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Half those touches are rushes WELL BELOW the league average. You’re right, the comparison is unfair in and of itself, but Reggie sure as hell isn’t making it any closer to valid by sh*tting the bed. On the other hand, 14 yards per touch is slightly ABOVE the league average for WRs. A statistical comparison between the two was intended in the first place. All I’m saying is that one first rounder was showing signs of life, playing up to (actually above) par for the first time in his career and was subsequently 76ed in favor of table scraps. The other first rounder is sinking faster than an anchor in quicksand. Granted, his downward spiral hasn’t killed any pedestrians just yet. If you want to give the guy a merit badge for that, be my guest. The fact remains he’s not the same back he was in 2006. He is and has been consistently outperformed on a per touch basis by two undrafted free agents, Pierre Thomas and Mike Bell. Make that six, if you feel like including Lance Moore, Aaron Stecker, David Patten and Terrence Copper. Not to mention practically every RB in his own draft class. Jerious Norwood has a better per touch average as a non-starter, as does Lawrence Maroney. LAWRENCE MARONEY. When is enough enough? By second overall pick in the draft standards, he is a B-U-S-T. Serviceable 3rd down change of pace back? Maybe. But certainly not for the money he’s being paid TODAY. And the last time I checked, this is a win NOW league. Unfortunately, the trade deadline has come and gone, meaning we have to suck it up and tolerate this dog and pony show for another 12 weeks, maybe longer. I’m just hoping that our starstruck thumb-twiddling doesn’t come back to bite us, be it in the form of adequate depth at another position — HELLO, OLB — a costly Bush fumble in the NFC Championship game, an inability to convert a 4th and inches, because a more effective runner is sitting on the inactive list, etc. Maybe I’m the eternal pessimist, but I honestly believe ALL of those scenarios are more likely than Reggie being carried off the field on his teammates shoulders, after scoring the winning TD on a punt return in the Super Bowl.

"Paralyze resistance with persistence" -Woody Hayes

by coldpizza on Oct 21, 2009 1:46 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

wasn’t intended in the first place.

"Paralyze resistance with persistence" -Woody Hayes

by coldpizza on Oct 21, 2009 1:47 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

“The fact remains he’s not the same back he was in 2006.”

I say that and I don’t even feel like he was anything particularly special in ‘06. He was simply utilized far more often than he is now. His per touch average was still sub-par, even then. As is Marques Colston’s, for what that’s worth. The difference there being that NONE of our WRs have proven to be terribly consistent in that department over a number of games, so Colston has remained the go-to guy through the air. He’s dependable, his size presents mismatches, he’s the best we have for a variety of other reasons BESIDES ypc. BOTH Thomas AND Bell are more consistent than Bush (per touch) on the ground. Therefore, they have surpassed Bush and now get more carries. Sure, Bush still brings a few things to the table that those two don’t, just not consistently. He shined in 2006, because Deuce was showing signs of wear, Stallworth was shipped off, Horn was battered, Colston wasn’t a household name yet, etc. Payton played what both he and everyone else thought was his best hand at the time. And he played it over and over and over again. Today, there are TWO backs better on the roster (not one). There are ESTABLISHED wide receivers who are all relatively YOUNG and HEALTHY. Bush has also had two knee surgeries since. All of that has played into where we are now. And that’s at a point where his own team has passed him by. Not to mention practically everyone else who was truly outperforming him (albeit not so apparently) all along.

"Paralyze resistance with persistence" -Woody Hayes

by coldpizza on Oct 21, 2009 2:09 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

All valid pointd

But that goes back to what I originally stated. It’s a put up or shut up year. It all comes back to consistency, and I think that’s whay Payton is telling him from a touches standpoint. He was pissed about the fumble (I think against the Jets) that ended in them getting 7. Where he said, “Enjoy watching the game.” or whatever it was. I think he’s making a statement to Bush, making him earn his carries and his touches, and it’s up to Bush to respond. If he does, he’ll see more opportunities, if not, I think he’ll get the walking papers at the end of the year. I do think he’s looking better this year than he has years past (aside from the fumbles). I think he is aware his job is truly on the line in New Orleans, and I have a feeling he is going to step up in a big way. Course, I could Hope in one hand and spit in the other, all I’d end up with is a wet hand.

The people who say, "Winning isn't everything," don't win very often.

by Hooahsaint on Oct 21, 2009 2:48 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

And it’s not like Reggie gets the same depth on his pass routes as Stallworth either. It’s a truly unfair comparison.

The people who say, "Winning isn't everything," don't win very often.

by Hooahsaint on Oct 21, 2009 1:13 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

it doesn't make sense to compare Stallworth to Bush

That’s ridiculous! compare any running back to a receiver…oh wait just noticed HB-NOLA did. Coldpizza get over it! We get it, you don’t think much of the guy, but at least come with a intelligent and fair argument, this WR vs RB crap is hilarious to say the least!

Don't worry I got your back cuz...

by TAYDIGGA on Oct 21, 2009 1:33 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

“That’s ridiculous! compare any running back to a receiver”

I’ve already compared him to Michael Bennett, Eric Metcalf, Vai Sikahema and Dave Meggett. The comparison with Stallworth was in direct response to a question of his worth. There’s no better way to statistically compare the two. Is Bush more valuable to the 2009 Saints, than Stallworth was to the 2005 Saints? That’s the point of contention. I contend that he isn’t. Not by a longshot. If you feel otherwise, validate your opinion with something a little more tangible than the hackneyed BS decoy excuse that’s been rehashed since the day he was drafted. If that’s all you have, I’ll suggest that Antowain Smith wouldn’t have rushed for anywhere close to 659 yards in 2005, without Stallworth keeping the safety support of opposing defenses honest with his blazing speed in the secondary. They were both phenomenal decoys. Sure, Bush allowed his WRs more yards per touch than Stallworth allowed his RBs, but as you already pointed out, you can’t compare RB stats to WR stats. Your turn.

"Paralyze resistance with persistence" -Woody Hayes

by coldpizza on Oct 22, 2009 1:02 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Walter Payton's career average yards per touch

4330 touches (rushes + receptions)
21264 total yards

4.91 yards/touch.

Are you done making ridiculous comparisons between WRs and RBs yet?

by HB-NOLA on Oct 21, 2009 11:57 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

one other neat useless stat

TDs as a % of touches

W. Payton → 2.9%
R. Bush → 3.2%

And the Bush stat does not include punt returns for TDs.

by HB-NOLA on Oct 21, 2009 12:00 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Actually

Touches would include punt and kickoff returns, giving Payton 21803 on 4347, slightly over the 5.0 ypt. That’s about where any RB wants to be on a per TOUCH average. The thing is, Payton’s per rushing attempts average (4.4) contributes heavily to that average; that balance in versatility. Bush’s doesn’t. He breaks off a punt return for a TD every once in a blue moon to keep himself in that ballpark. Take Brian Mitchell, who made a career of returning punts and kickoffs. 23316 on 1713. That’s a 13.6 ypt average. Was he more than twice the RB Payton was? Of course not. It’s a ridiculously skewed statistic, as you’re already aware. That being said, even Brian Mitchell averaged 5.1 yards per rushing attempt. Granted, that’s on less than two carries per game, but one of the arguments for Bush’s ineffectiveness on the ground is his LACK of touches. Understand that while there’s some validity to “the more regularly a RB is used, the easier it will all come to him”. Also understand that it’s easier to maintain an average with less touches. It’s a two-sided argument and Bush doesn’t (and hasn’t) supported either side of it. Not as a ground weapon, anyway. To Norv Turner’s credit, he was able to put a finger on Mitchell’s forte and use him nearly exclusively in that capacity. To Sean Payton’s credit, it seems like he’s beginning to see the light also, although I still think Bush is used FAR too often as a traditional RB. Of course, Brian Mitchell was a 5th round pick that didn’t make anywhere near the greenback Reggie makes when compared to the rest of the pie, so maybe Turner wasn’t as compelled to fit a square peg into a round hole(?) Regardless of the reasoning, we currently have a Brian Mitchell/Eric Metcalf/Vai Sikahema caliber RB on our roster, who hasn’t done dick-to-diddly on the ground in ‘09, hasn’t broken a special play in over a calendar year, and is slowly but surely being weened off the teet of opportunity. All things considered, that can only be construed as a good thing. What could arguably be construed as a BETTER thing, at least in my opinion, is if he was gone all together and someone else was being given what little opportunity he’s now undeservedly enjoying.

"Paralyze resistance with persistence" -Woody Hayes

by coldpizza on Oct 21, 2009 12:43 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

hasn’t broken a special teams play in over a calendar year

"Paralyze resistance with persistence" -Woody Hayes

by coldpizza on Oct 21, 2009 12:45 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

You're missing my point

You don’t really think I believe Reggie is anywhere near as great a RB as Sweetness, do you? You were comparing Reggie’s yards/touch to a supposed deep threat receiver. The point I was making is that that is just as crazy as comparing his stats to Payton’s.

Yeah, I’d love it too if Reggie wasn’t such a big part of the salary cap, but the fact is his contract was based on his position in the draft, and has nothing to do with his performance on the field, unless there are performance bonuses I’m unaware of.

As far as trading him, I think that’s probably a bad idea as well, mainly because they would need to replace him with multiple players. He may not be as great as Payton, but there is no denying the guy’s versatility. Pierre is ok at receiving out of the back field, but not nearly as good as Reggie, nor is he as good at picking up blitzes. Granted, that’s a new found talent for Bush, but still a very important one. And, course, there’s the punt returning. If other teams see him as mediocre as you do, then there’s no way the Saints get a good return value. At least when they traded Stallworth, they got 1 medium quality LB and a draft pick. An equivalently valued trade for Reggie would have to involve multiple draft picks and/or skill players.

If Reggie were to be traded, would the other team have to pick up his remaining contract? Would another team have the option of trying to negotiate a smaller contract with him, or asking the Saints to absorb part of it? If the Saints had to eat part of that contract, that really takes away one of the main reasons to get rid of him.

by HB-NOLA on Oct 21, 2009 6:38 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

“At least when they traded Stallworth, they got 1 medium quality LB and a draft pick. An equivalently valued trade for Reggie would have to involve multiple draft picks and/or skill players.”

Normally, I would agree with you. Based on Payton’s warped perception of player value, I don’t. Stallworth was a starter. Reggie isn’t. Optimally, I’d like to see us rape whatever team would be willing to trade with us, rack up multiple starters, and/or first day draft picks, etc. I just can’t imagine that and the reason is threefold: a.) Reggie isn’t worth all that, b.) it’s unlikely that any other team in the league thinks he’s worth all that, and c.) even if there was a team that did, odds are Mickey Loomis would do a half ass job of seeking them out, based on the knee jerk Stallworth deal. If you don’t think we could have gotten more than what we did, for a starting WR coming off his best season as a pro, you’re crazy. Dallas traded two 1st round picks for Joey Galloway. Not saying we would have ever gotten that for Stallworth, just that what we did manage to get for him made me sick to my stomach for months afterward. I couldn’t really give a hairy rat’s rump who we trade away, as long as we get fair or better trade value for them. That goes for Stallworth, Bush, Brees and any other player on the roster. Since that’s evidently not this regime’s M.O., outright cutting a declining underachiever wouldn’t exactly elicit the same sick feelings in me that I felt for a play of greater worth then. Just my opinion, of course.

"Paralyze resistance with persistence" -Woody Hayes

by coldpizza on Oct 22, 2009 1:19 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

“If the Saints had to eat part of that contract, that really takes away one of the main reasons to get rid of him.”

Not sure on that, but I don’t think it would be enough of a cap hit to sweat. Obviously, the trade deadline has passed now, so the only option would be to outright cut him, something I would not be opposed to. Next season, if there is no cap, I see absolutely no reason to hang on to him, even for the veteran minimum, unless he’s made substantial improvement in at least one of his “asset” (sic) areas. And by substantial improvement, I mean yards per touch. Not cumulative yards. Not TDs. If you feed the ball to P.J. Hill the same number of times you do Reggie, odds are he’s going to be more productive any way you slice it.

"Paralyze resistance with persistence" -Woody Hayes

by coldpizza on Oct 22, 2009 1:27 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

wow

P. J. Hill? I’m pretty realistic about Reggie’s abilities and value to the team, but comparing him to Hill is just crazy. During preseason, playing against 2s and 3s, he never got over 4 yds/carry, except against the Raiders after they decided to quit playing. I think Hill has some potential, but to say he could be as effective as Bush right now is, well, willfully ignorant.

And why wouldn’t TDs count more than yards/touch? Having a RB that can get to the edge as quickly as Bush can is very valuable in goal line situations. How many yards/touch would Reggie have to achieve for you to consider him valuable?

by HB-NOLA on Oct 22, 2009 8:23 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

At least 4.0. That’s still below the league average, but I’d be ok with it.

"Paralyze resistance with persistence" -Woody Hayes

by coldpizza on Oct 22, 2009 11:48 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I agree

that Loomis should have gotten a higher draft pick (probably 2nd or 3rd round), but I disagree that Donte was a much greater asset to the team than Reggie. I doubt I’d be able to convince you of that. But I’ll reiterate that while Donte was decent deep threat WR, Reggie does a lot more.

Let me make an analogy. I own an older Subaru WRX that I’ve been thinking of selling or trading. I really like the car, but I really would like to get something new. Here’s the problem. My Subi does all sorts of things for me – it’s still a blast to drive, it has a surprisingly large cargo area, the back seats are big enough for my two large dogs, and it can even do some offroading. On the other hand, it’s blue book value is about $10k. So, I have to consider the cost to replace everything it does for me, which is going to be vastly greater $10k.

Reggie’s blue book value may not be very high, but the replacement costs are.

by HB-NOLA on Oct 22, 2009 8:15 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Based on what he’s contributed in 2009, I disagree. Promote P.J. Hill and/or Adrian Arrington as replacement(s), Moore, Porter or Jenkins returning punts and we’re fine. Those guys are all already under contract.

"Paralyze resistance with persistence" -Woody Hayes

by coldpizza on Oct 22, 2009 11:52 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

No one called Walter Payton a fraud, while lauding Bush.

"Paralyze resistance with persistence" -Woody Hayes

by coldpizza on Oct 21, 2009 12:47 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

What does that mean?

I’m not doing either of those things.

by HB-NOLA on Oct 21, 2009 6:41 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

It means that’s the only reason I was comparing Stallworth and Bush’s stats.

"Paralyze resistance with persistence" -Woody Hayes

by coldpizza on Oct 22, 2009 1:30 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Reggie

catches screens and 5-7 yards over the middle, Donte was up field rec./drops some stats are complete balooned. What was Dontes’ TD total.

You think you know, and you don't know, and you never, ever will.-Jim Mora Sr.

by metryman on Oct 21, 2009 2:22 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Touchdowns are about as useless a comparative statistic as there is in football. They’re products of field position. Was Leroy Hoard five times the running back Ricky Williams was in 1999? Of course not. He was a drive finisher on a potent offense. Reggie’s helped move the ball down the field in the past via the air, he’s just not doing it consistently anymore. He’s also not scoring much anymore. Or gaining yardage on the ground (nothing new there). Or doing anything on punt returns. In a nutshell, virtually nothing, aside from dancing and wasting a roster spot. There are two solutions to that problem. Use him more or get rid of him. Based on his yards per touch throughout his NFL career, I’d prefer the latter. Even if they made him a full time WR, his yards per reception don’t merit a roster spot. Of course, a legitimate WR wouldn’t be running flat routes 95% of the time, so maybe that’s a viable option. I’m just going by what I’ve seen over the last 3+ seasons.

"Paralyze resistance with persistence" -Woody Hayes

by coldpizza on Oct 22, 2009 1:44 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Stujo was right...

Don't worry I got your back cuz...

by TAYDIGGA on Oct 21, 2009 1:35 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

after Stallworth left the Saints

he averaged 2.6 catches per game. Not exactly the impact player you would expect for the muti-million contract he was getting. He had no work ethic, and quite frankly it seemed he was okay with just putting in the least amount of effort to still make 3-5 nil per year and not put his body at risk. That’s why I say he’s a fraud. He had no heart and no team loyalty. I saw him up here in Phila. and he was a phony. That’s why Phila got rid of him, that’s why NE goit rid of him, that’s why Payton got rid of him. In NE he moved down the depth chart below Moss, Welker, Gaffney and maybe even another receiver. He was either 4th or 5th, couldn’t even beat out Gaffney. At least Reggie gives you 100% and is a team player and wants to have an impact in a game.

"Indecision may or may not be my biggest problem" - Jimmy Buffett

by Philinwood on Oct 22, 2009 7:34 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

“He had no heart and no team loyalty. I saw him up here in Phila. and he was a phony. That’s why Phila got rid of him”

Andy Reid has gone on record saying they did everything in their power to re-sign Stallworth and he walked for a one-year deal. Don’t hand me that bunch of mularkey. He got hurt in New England. That’s the only reason he wasn’t starting for the ridiculous money they were paying him. It wasn’t until after Moss went an entire season without stirring up crap that they knew they wouldn’t need both going forward. Once again, he struck it rich in Cleveland. Which only backs up my argument that the Saints could have gotten more than they did for him in a trade. There were at least two other teams willing to pay more for him than the Eagles were and we settled for the quick push.

"Paralyze resistance with persistence" -Woody Hayes

by coldpizza on Oct 22, 2009 12:01 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I can't believe you're a Donte Stallworth advocate

They got rid of him, because he was a punk. Point blank. The guy thought he was above the team, could miss workouts and undermine Payton. He also wanted to restructure his contract to get paid on par with the top receivers in the game, and I’m sorry, he wasn’t that good. Payton got rid of him, because he was replaceable, a distraction, and expensive. He’s done NOTHING at any other location to prove otherwise. Furthermore, the guy killed a man while driving in his Bentley while drunk and on drugs. How can you honestly like a guy like that? He had ONE good season as a Saint and a few Devery Henderson-esque seasons.

The people who say, "Winning isn't everything," don't win very often.

If stupidity is a cancer, you're terminal.

When you die and go to hell, you come back as a Jets fan.

by Hooahsaint on Oct 23, 2009 1:12 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

As far as the trade . . .

Payton felt he needed to get rid of him, and I agree with that. He had plenty to focus on already with resurrecting a franchise. The last thing he needed was to prolong the dismissal of a wide receiver and have something kind of like Arizona was going through with Anquan Boldin. I guarantee they wouldn’t more for him than anyone was willing to give, it got public, it got ugly, and people were less and less interested. Odds are the same thing could’ve and would’ve happened with Stallworth. In the end, he turned out to be who Payton thought he was. He got a draft pick and a decent LB for a guy he would’ve cut if he had no other choice. I’d say that’s a win.

The people who say, "Winning isn't everything," don't win very often.

If stupidity is a cancer, you're terminal.

When you die and go to hell, you come back as a Jets fan.

by Hooahsaint on Oct 23, 2009 1:16 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I’d say it isn’t. Not for the top WR on your team, coming off of his best season as a pro. Like I said, it’s not the fact that they got rid of Stallworth that bothers me. It’s the horrendous trade value they got for him. And just about every fan of every other team in the league, other than the Saints (who are brainwashed to believe that their favorite organization can do no wrong), agreed with that sentiment at the time of the trade. If they traded Marques Colston for Hunter Hillenmeyer and a 4th rounder today, I’d have the same bad taste in my mouth.

"Paralyze resistance with persistence" -Woody Hayes

by coldpizza on Oct 23, 2009 1:48 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Stallworth wasn’t the best receiver on the team at that point. Joe Horn was. You can point to slightly better numbers for Stallworth in 2005, but that is clearly not the whole story. Stallworth was an underachieving journeyman WR, Horn was an advanced veteran, and there is no question as to which one sold more tickets (yes that is important) and was a more dangerous offensive threat.

You are again being willfully ignorant if you are seriously comparing Stallworth to Colston. Stallworth has never had a 1000 yard season, and topped out at 8 TDs in his rookie season. Colston has had 2 1000 yard seasons, and was on pace to have his 3rd last year. His fewest # of TDs in a full season was 8 – the same as Stallworth’s maximum.

by HB-NOLA on Oct 23, 2009 2:28 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

SLIGHTLY better numbers in 2005? Oh yeah, 21 receptions, 291 yards and 6 TDs better. Talk about a photo finish. I honestly can’t remember Horn playing an entire game that season. He wasn’t the same WR then or the following year under Payton. Stallworth wasn’t a journeyman at the time. He had never played for another NFL team and was probably the only player on the entire roster that didn’t tank it in 2005, aside from Charles Grant. Then again, I doubt you were following the team very closely at the time, so I can’t rightly expect you to remember the finer details of that atrocious pre-Payton season. And I never compared Stallworth to Colston. I compared losing the best WR on your team in exchange for next to nothing in value. Both players fit that bill pretty equally. Stallworth’s 945 receiving yards in 2005 represented 26.2% of the team’s 3604 total. Colston’s 394 represents 28.1% of their current 1400. Stallworth has also averaged 14.8 yards per reception throughout his career, while Colston is currently at 14.1. That’s no knock on Colston. I love the guy and think he was a phenomenal find in the 7th round. I just think had Payton been any sort of a disciplinarian, he would have handled the matter differently. As I’ve said before, you don’t see Bill Belichick shying away from potential insubordination, so why on earth should an unestablished NFL coach, less than two months on the job? It was a knee jerk reaction and wound up costing the Saints in more ways than one. Horn didn’t finish out the 2006 season. Stallworth was perfectly healthy in the playoffs with the Eagles. Being that Payton was deadset on passing the ball in freezing, wet Soldier Field regardless, maybe that 2nd 14+ yard per reception threat may have made a difference. I won’t belabor the point beyond that season, because there’s no telling if he walks in free agency, regardless. But what if they re-sign him to a two or three year contract? Maybe he still tears his hamstring in ‘07, but even if he does, are we really any worse off than we were? Probably not, because we probably wouldn’t have spent a 1st rounder on Robert Meachem, who didn’t do much of jack until this season. Had we not, we either wind up with Jon Beason, in which case we’re set at OLB, or Greg Olsen and the Shockey trade never happens. The trickle down continues. As is, we have an ineffective backup MLB on IR and Jahri Evans to show for that trade. Granted, Evans was a great pick, but they could have taken him earlier in that same round had they not flip-flopped, so that’s a wash. I just despised the move at the time. In hindsight, not nearly as much based on all that’s transpired with Stallworth. But it’s not like any of that was predetermined by his media-overblown pissy disposition with a hotshot new boss. It’s also not like Payton or Loomis knew the gem they were getting in Colston prior to then. If you remember, Jamal Jones was the projected Week 1 starter throughout training camp that first season. Colston was given the opportunity and fortunately nevr looked back. That doesn’t mean it couldn’t have been a Colston-Stallworth show all season, as Horn faded off into the sunset. That also doesn’t mean we couldn’t have gotten more for him in a trade, be it with the Eagles, or the 25 or so other NFL teams Loomis probably didn’t even bother calling. I do think everything has worked out fine in the long run, but had a couple of the questionable moves of the summer of ‘06 been handled just a little differently — the Stallworth trade and Bush selection, in particular — I really do think we’d be working towards our second Vince Lombardi Trophy right now and not just our second postseason appearance since.

"Paralyze resistance with persistence" -Woody Hayes

by coldpizza on Oct 23, 2009 4:24 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Serendipity

The end result was great, but I do disagree on one thing . . . Bush is a LARGE part of why the Saints went to the Championship game his rookie season. He led the league in receptions, defenses were so scared of him that the entire zone would shift dependent on where he went, and everything else opened up as a result. Brees and Payton said as much themselves. Every team in the league was talking about it. Since that season, he hasn’t been nearly as effective, but if you argue that he wasn’t a big part of the reason the Saints went so deep in 2006, then it’s obvious to me that you’re letting personal bias get in the way of good sense.

Aside from all that, he’s another big reason the Saints resurrected the Franchise to begin with. Your team is only as good as your fan base. Benson was looking to move the team due to poor ticket sales and merchandise sales. Well, I should say poorer. I’m sure he was still making money, just not what he wanted to be making. Regardless, Reggie got drafted and the city came alive. At the time everyone was far more excited about getting him in black and gold then they were about Drew. Hell, no one knew that Drew was going to be so prolific. Fact is, fans get pumped, the Dome sold out almost immediately, merchandise sales were through the roof, and that was before the first game even started. Fan support was another HUGE reason they did so well that season. The Saints fall just short, the city is alive, the money is rolling in for Benson, the city legislature sees how important the Saints are to the city at large, a few years later we have essentially a dynasty in the making and a pro team in one of the smallest media markets for the foreseeable future. Anyone that doesn’t see the drafting of Reggie Bush as important to the team and city is just plain blind.

Now if we could only get him to produce :D

The people who say, "Winning isn't everything," don't win very often.

If stupidity is a cancer, you're terminal.

When you die and go to hell, you come back as a Jets fan.

by Hooahsaint on Oct 23, 2009 6:18 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Okay, CP so you don't like Reggie

big deal, we’re undefeated. Reggie has made contributiions such as TDs, first downs, blocks, etc. He’s going nowhere this season as far as trades are concerned. What’s the big deal? Can’t you sit back and enjoy this great season and give Reggie credit for either the small, medium or large contributions he is making to an awesome team? So what he makes a lot of money. Look how much Brunell is making for essentially holding a clipboard. It doesn’t matter how much Reggie or anyone else makes when your team’s management has put into place the personnel to win. Sometimes you gets bargains, sometimes you over pay. It’s the NFL, that’s the way it works. Bell could get more yards this year than Westbrook, but make way less. It doesn’t matter. All that matters is we win. If Nesbit is our TE and we win, the only thing that matters is we win. If the Saints have to play the rest of their games on Sat mornings at LSU, all that matters is we win. Until we lose and you can connect Reggie to the losing, none of it matters.

"Indecision may or may not be my biggest problem" - Jimmy Buffett

by Philinwood on Oct 22, 2009 7:45 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

to be fair

coldpizza didn’t start the thread. He just responded with the same position and arguments that he’s had for a while. I haven’t been here very long, but I get the impression he’s been making those same arguments for a couple of years. That’s just my impression, though – that after Reggie’s less than award winning rookie year, coldpizza was done with him.

And Brunell actually does less than hold the clipboard. That idiot took a completely unnecessary sack Sunday, not only ruining a 500 yard offensive day against the #1 defense, but tarnishing the O-Line’s outstanding numbers as well. Why the hell didn’t he get rid of the damn ball????

by HB-NOLA on Oct 22, 2009 8:46 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

HB, I didn’t even want them to draft Reggie. I saw it as a luxury pick at the time, for a team largely void of talent on both sides of the ball. Trading down was all I hoped for. More picks = more bodies. Staying put, they should have drafted Ferguson. I said it then and I stand by that to this day. Even if Bush turned out to be everything he was hyped up to be, I still think it was a “kiss up to the locals” selection, following Benson’s about face. Someone to put butts in the Superdome seats, NOT a move in the best interests of making the team better on the whole. Quality RBs seem to grow on trees in the draft. Look back at the Class of ‘06 alone and look at all the possible ways we could have filled that secondary void in our backfield. Which honestly wasn’t even a void, being that we already had Michael Bennett in the fold. To pass up a franchise OT for ANY running back is inexcusable, imo. To be completely candid, I would have even rathered A.J. Hawk than a RB with the 2nd pick. That’s not to say I haven’t given Reggie a chance to prove me wrong. I’ve been critical of him all along, but it’s not like I’m the only one who has, nor has it been completely unwarranted. I admit, I’m not a fan of his and probably never will be. I will say though, that people thought I was off my rocker when I said we had made the wrong move then. Now, it’s quite the opposite in many circles. I hear and see more and more people hopping off the Reggie bandwagon each year. I can’t see where my personal predisposition is to blame for that.

As far as Brunell goes, I’m not comfortable with him as a starter, if and when Brees suffers a catastrophic injury. Even less so than I was at the onset of this season, as I feel as though a pass-heavy offense tends to hide a QB’s shortcomings more than a balanced attack does. I realize that statement won’t make a whole lot of sense to casual football watcher, but it’s an accurate one. I won’t make this a 5,000 word dissertation. In any case, I think they need someone younger and more mobile with experience. Chase Daniel is not the answer in 2009. Unfortunately, neither is Brunell. Lord help us, if Brees goes down.

I agree with you that he had no business taking that sack on Sunday. If you’re out of the pocket, just launch the ball past the line of scrimmage and out of bounds. There is no intentional grounding under that scenario. A microcosm of things to come? Let’s hope not. It’s little things like this that make me want to get the loose ends tied up now. Couldn’t we use Marcus Washington, now that Fujita is injured? Truth is, we could have used him all along. I’m not a wait and react type person. I see potential problems and fix them before they manifest. Bush as our primary RB is a potential problem. Actually, the word “potential” doesn’t even belong in that sentence. That’s an effing disaster waiting to happen. Brunell might deserve a “potential” in his caveat, just because he’s been a starter in the NFL since the mid 1990s.

"Paralyze resistance with persistence" -Woody Hayes

by coldpizza on Oct 22, 2009 12:55 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

didn't mean to put words in your mouth

or on your keyboard, as the case may be. I see what you mean about trading down in the 2006 draft. But taking an O-Linemen 2nd overall would have been kinda crazy, however good Ferguson is. They already had Brown, Nesbit, and Stinchcomb, and they picked up Faine, Evans, and Strief in that draft. The line is better now, but that was a pretty damn good group. And don’t underestimate the importance of putting butts in the seats. Also, Payton came in with an idea of the kind of offense he wanted to run, and Bush definitely fit in with that plan, so I can see why he jumped at the chance to get him. It is a shame he hasn’t lived up to all the hype, but I don’t see that as a reason to cut him or trade him for less than they can get in return.

I am really at a loss as to how you can think Bell or Hill are in any way better options at RB right now. The stat you keep mentioning favors Bush over both of them by quite a lot. Bush has 5.14 yards/touch, Bell has 4.46. Obviously, Hill doesn’t have any regular season stats, and realistically his preseason appearances don’t provide a big enough sample. That said, the only decent game he had was against an Oakland team that didn’t even want to be on the field. Including that stat pumping game, his yards/touch was still only 4.89, including 2 receptions. Without the Oakland game, it drops to 3.47. Not exactly awe-inspiring.

Some more depth at LB might be nice, but not at the cost of a skill player. I honestly wanted them to draft Rey Maualuga in the first round this year. With Porter coming back healthy, and the free agent pickups in the secondary, I thought they were focusing too much on that. But with the late round picks they made, I think the depth at LB is pretty good. I agree about fixing the roof before it starts raining, but it’s not that simple. It takes time to install a player in a system, especially one as varied as GW’s. He’s been teaching these guys since OTAs and it shows in the improved performance of the same corps from last year. I can’t imagine that cutting Bush to sign Marcus Washington would suddenly have this team playing better. Just the opposite. In the long term, that might make sense, but definitely not in the middle of an undefeated season.

We seem to be in nearly complete agreement on the backup QB situation. I had thought Brunell would be ok there, but after preseason and that performance Sunday, I think they ought to release him right now. Talk about a wasted roster spot. Chase is a work in progress, sure, but how much worse could he be? At least he could get some useful snaps in during garbage time whenever the Saints have a game locked up. Brunell is just biding time and wasting space.

by HB-NOLA on Oct 22, 2009 4:33 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

They didn’t draft Faine. Faine came over from the Browns in free agency. And yes, they did draft the other two, but that was after the Bush pick. I suppose you’re satisfied with Jammal Brown’s play on the left side. His run blocking leaves a lot to be desired, imo. I personally think he’s vastly overrated as a LT and would be better served on the right side, where he played his best football as a rookie. That being for RT pay, of course. Had he never switched over, Ferguson and Brown would have been the bookend OTs we haven’t had since Roaf and Turley. They would have made the running game better no matter who was back there. There’s no doubt in my mind that a Ferguson/D. Williams, Ferguson/Addai, Ferguson/Jones-Drew, Ferguson/Washington, Ferguson/Norwood, just about any one of those combinations would have been better than Strief/Bush, especially when you already have McAllister and Bennett in the fold at the time.

That’s not to say I disagree with every move Sean Payton made that season. The Brees move was phenomal and not something I expected whatsoever. We could have wound up trading down or taking Leinart or Young with that first round pick. Where would we be right now then? At the time, I thought Josh McCown made a lot of sense from a financial standpoint. Fortunately, Benson didn’t go that route, open his wallet and did the right thing at QB. That doesn’t mean he had to do it at RB also.

As far as the Bell/Bush comparison goes, Bell has a better yds per carry avg, on the ground, as well as a better yds per catch avg. Why that doesn’t equate to a better yards per touch avg overall, I have no idea. It’s a statistical anomaly, I would imagine. Probably something to do with his only having one reception. The fact remains, Bell hasn’t been active in a game that Bush hasn’t, so we haven’t had the opportunity to see if he’d be better over the stretch at catching the ball out of the backfield, by far Bush’s forte. Based on Bell’s higher career average in that very category — as well as practically every other similiarly built RB in the league’s — I have no reason to believe that he wouldn’t be, given that opportunity. Bush is nothing more than a touch whore. As I’ve already said, if Bell was getting the same number of touches, he’d be getting better yardage. I believe the same of P.J. Hill. They’re average NFL backs, in terms of receiving skills. They have better vision between the tackles than Bush does. It’s no giant leap of faith to believe they would be better than Bush in an expanded role. Bush just isn’t that talented of a player on the NFL level, regardless of what you might be led to believe by cumulative statistics (read: overuse).

We could go back and forth on that all day and night and I’m sure neither one of us are going to see things any differently. As far as this past draft does, I still think we need a franchise LT, so I was disappointed when they didn’t draft Michael Oher. He’s already been shifted over in Baltimore, btw. That’s twelve games sooner than Jammal Brown was deemed ready to take that step. No super gripes with the Jenkins pick, though. Improvement in the secondary was, without a doubt, a more pressing need in ‘09 than a complimentary backfield jitterbug was coming off a 3-13 season in ’06. Asses in the seats would have materialized, regardless. Maybe you’re underestimating the selling power of winning games. Maybe they lose to Tampa without Bush’s last second punt return. I don’t think they lose to San Francisco without his four TD performance. Michael Bennett could have scored four times with that many rushing attempts in the red zone. At worst, I see us as the same mediocre, overachieving team that managed to win the division playing a 4th place schedule, without or witout Reggie Bush.

I do like Rey Maualuga, though I can’t see spending first round money on a guy that would see the field as seldom as we run a 3-4. He surely wouldn’t have started over Vilma, so what sense would that pick have made? Washington made a lot of sense to me during the offseason — when everyone else was busy squawking about Derrick Brooks, like that was etched in stone — and it still makes sense today. Of course, I have no idea what kind of football shape he’s in. Regardless, I still think our need for OLB depth is greater than our need for a complimentary backfield jitterbug. Same assessment, different year. LOL an undefeated season. I mean, yeah it’s awesome that we haven’t lost a game yet and I fully understand the logic behind “if it ain’t broke, don’t fix it”, but that’s not something you have to adhere by to the letter of the law. If our success was THAT precarious … THAT contingent on not making the wrong personnel decision, then why on earth did we risk waiving Chase Daniel to bring Garrett Hartley back from suspension? What? Risk cutting Martrez Miller, while trading a draft pick for DAve Thomas? Gasp! Look out, Who Dat Nation. The Black & Gold Jenga tower is starting to wobble ever so slightly. Please. You do whatever you think is in the best interests of the team at the time. Whether that move is as bold as trading a starting WR for a Zip-Lok bag full of dirt, or outright cutting an underachieving RB in favor of a guy who might provide quality temporary relief in another area, you roll with the punches and you make that move. That’s what happened in ‘06 and I learned to live with it, albeit begrudgingly. If it happened again, I’m sure you would, too.

"Paralyze resistance with persistence" -Woody Hayes

by coldpizza on Oct 23, 2009 2:49 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

“Until we lose and you can connect Reggie to the losing, none of it matters.”

I agree with part of that. Not the “connecting Reggie” part though, as he represents a roster spot. Any loss could therefore be pinned on his being here, in hindsight. I won’t take that cop out approach, but I will say that our biggest needs are at OLB, OT, C, pure power RB and backup QB. If one of those is the reason we lose a game, consider my bitching justified.

"Paralyze resistance with persistence" -Woody Hayes

by coldpizza on Oct 22, 2009 12:06 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

My Gosh...

If you don’t like Reggie Bush become a Falcons fan. Let Reggie do what Reggie does and thats quiet all of the doubters (you know who you are). Did any of you chear last week when he scored that touchdown or have you ever cheared for him when he makes a great play because if you did you are a hypocrite.

REGGIE…REGGIE…REGGIE. Remember that?

by Drew D on Oct 22, 2009 9:21 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Wait, so are you saying you weren’t glad to see Jason David get waived, back in August? Or that you didn’t cheer, when he stripped Reggie Wayne and returned the fumble for a TD, in the 2007 season opener? What about his five interceptions last season? I’m sure you just sat quietly staring at the TV on those plays. You’re right, though. I know who I am. I’m someone who has never chanted “Reggie”. Well, not since the Angels lost to the Brewers in the 1982 ALCS, anyway.

"Paralyze resistance with persistence" -Woody Hayes

by coldpizza on Oct 23, 2009 3:02 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I HAVE chanted “Red Cheese” several dozen times, though. If that’s any consolation.

"Paralyze resistance with persistence" -Woody Hayes

by coldpizza on Oct 23, 2009 3:04 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

You all...

sound like Adam Schecter with all you drivvle about stats and such. I happy to see everyone knows how to Google.

by Drew D on Oct 22, 2009 9:23 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Oh Yeah...

I just wanted to make one quick comment on the entire Reggie vs Stallworth delima. Who is drunk driving a Bently at 7:30am. Thats all i wanted to say. Thanks

by Drew D on Oct 22, 2009 9:33 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yes, I’m sure that played heavily into why Loomis accepted next to nothing for him, two years prior.

"Paralyze resistance with persistence" -Woody Hayes

by coldpizza on Oct 23, 2009 2:55 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Take money out of the equation

And people have nothing to argue about. I’m sorry, Coldpizza, you have a lot of merit in most of what you say, but if money is out of the equation, there’s no way you should want him gone. A roster spot? You’re sweating a roster spot? That’s kind of ridiculous given some of the bodies we have out there. To say that he’s not a solid third-string runningback at least is total BS.

Bottom line is we can’t trade him, because no one is going to pick up his contract. We cut him and we lose money, and someone else gets something for free. Best course is to keep him for less money. Everyone argues that he is the third-string running back, so if that’s the case, he’s the best third-string running back in football, hands down. He’s also the starter week-in and week-out. I think it’s because when Reggie is in, the defense doesn’t know what’s coming. They have to watch the flats, pitches, make sure he doesn’t break one, look for the play action. There’s just a lot to be afraid of. They’re terrified of him getting into space. Once that initial series is done, Payton can see what kind of defense he’s up against, and he tools his offense around it.

I honestly think Reggie’s going to hit a groove in coming weeks and we’ll see what we saw in the early parts of 2008. It is important to remember that he’s well-liked too. Dealing away someone that is liked in the lockerroom can have other negative effects on the team.

The people who say, "Winning isn't everything," don't win very often.

If stupidity is a cancer, you're terminal.

When you die and go to hell, you come back as a Jets fan.

by Hooahsaint on Oct 23, 2009 1:32 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Unfortunately, money matters. A lot. As do roster spots. Don’t get me wrong, Reggie isn’t the only current Saint I think should be gone, based on what he’s making versus production. He’s just the most glaring. As far as third string RBs go, I’d definitely take Shonn Greene, Earnest Graham and Xavier Omon over Bush. They compliment our 1st and 2nd stringers better, imo. There may be a couple of others. Haven’t really given it much though. No, they don’t all do everything Bush does. That doesn’t mean they’re not better overall RBs. Randall Cunningham passed, ran and occasionally punted. Did that make him a better QB than Joe Montana?

I don’t think many teams are terrified of Reggie in open space anymore. Some elect to punt to him, others don’t. I’m sure it depends more on the score at the time and their own coverage personnel, than it does with the likelihood of him actually breaking one for a TD. Which he hasn’t done in over a year now. But yeah, I’m sure he’s still the electrifyingly mediocre all-around player he was before that minor season-ending knee surgery. Second one on the same knee, if memory serves. Can’t imagine that would have anything to do with his decline. Must be the number of touches he’s being given. Or the temperature inside the Superdome. Quick, someone get Reggie an electric blanket, before he appears to be in a career-long production slump.

“He’s also the starter week-in and week-out.”

That’s 80% true this season. He didn’t start against the Jets.

“There’s just a lot to be afraid of.”

Here’s one thing we can actually agree on. I’m terrified that Thomas and Bell both go down in the same game. Unless, Hamilton or Hill happens to be on the active roster. Or we have a 21 point lead halfway through the 4th quarter. Then, maybe not so much.

"Paralyze resistance with persistence" -Woody Hayes

by coldpizza on Oct 23, 2009 3:34 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Don't nickel and dime me on stats . . . "80% true"

I argue for a living, there’s nothing worse than someone who dismisses a valid point in a debate simply because they can find an “exception” to what is spoken. The entire point of that was why he’s utilized for the opening series, which is 80% of the time.

I also love how I mention he’s a solid third-down running back and instead of agreeing, you mention 4 others in the league you feel are better. That completely proves my point, but you’d rather argue it and weakly attempt to disagree. There’s a distinct difference between disagreeing and hating. You’re really starting to traipse over to the hater side.

And no, I wouldn’t be terrified if our Thomas and Bell went down. We’d be fine. In the game Thomas came back for Bush was doing just fine in the first half, and he would’ve done as well as Thomas in he second half. The defense was tired and the line started opening holes in the interior, which was why Thomas had so much success. The same would’ve been true for Reggie. I do think you are right about the knees though. I think he’s being limited a lot due to his knees. Maybe he’s not as healthy as he’s made out to be.

Regardless of all that, I have a prediction for Sunday. Bush starts . . . again. He does fine, again. And they check down to him a few times and notice the swing pass is open and effective. The Saints will want to control the clock a bit more this game, which means a more conservative passing approach. He’ll get a lot more touches this week. If he sucks, you can come on here and talk all the trash you want, and I’ll back you. But, if he does well, give him a little credit for a change.

The people who say, "Winning isn't everything," don't win very often.

If stupidity is a cancer, you're terminal.

When you die and go to hell, you come back as a Jets fan.

by Hooahsaint on Oct 23, 2009 6:39 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

You said (and I copy & paste) “he’s the best third-string running back in football, hands down.” I disagreed. Now (for the first time), you’re saying "he’s a solid third-down running back ". I don’t necessarily disagree with that. I think it depends on the distance. If it’s 3rd and more than 4, I think he’s a terrible option. We’d do better emptying the backfield and going with a 4th or 5th WR, imo. There’s a difference between third-string and third-down. In fact, most team’s third down backs are their second string. Darren Sproles and Leon Washington are two of the best in the game and both prime examples of that.

I’m fine with giving Bush credit, when he performs up to par with all our other RBs in the running game. If he was blowing them all out of the water in another department, I might be a little more lenient on the curve. He just hasn’t been, as of late. I maintain that he NEVER has, if you stop thinking in terms of cumulative yards. His touches are dwindling (and for good reason), so everything looks a little less rosey as a result. The straight up truth of the matter is, that’s all he ever had going for him was the touches. His first couple of seasons in that department were somewhat comparable to Terrence Mathis or O.J. McDuffie campaigns of the past. Just a whole lot of “feed Reggie the ball” and hope for the best. An impressive number of catches for a RB, but practically any NFL back could accomplish those totals, if targeted that often. Same with the yards. Btw, he never led the league in receptions. Maybe among RBs. No idea where you get some of this stuff you try to pass off as fact.

"Paralyze resistance with persistence" -Woody Hayes

by coldpizza on Oct 23, 2009 7:13 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

My bad

I meant led in receptions amongst running backs. I had thought that was understood. I’ll clarify in the future.

As far as your opening statement, I said both, I said he was a solid third-string back, then I went on later when I was speaking more from an opinion standpoint and stated best third-string back in football.

You still keep going back to the same arguments you have been, his lack of yards per rush or per catch. You’ve mentioned his fumbles as well, though he doesn’t really fumble more than any other backs do, aside from this season where his touches versus fumbles are a bit more glaring. The fact is, I’m not arguing whether he should be the starting running back. I’m arguing whether he is worth keeping as a third-string running back if he’s willing to take less money. You’re saying he should be cut, but you have no real basis for that. You said as much yourself when you essentially named only a few others you’d take in his place.

So why then should he be kicked to the curb if he’s willing to be in that role and take less money? The only reason I can see is you just personally dislike him, not that you feel he’s not capable in his present role. Why not get rid of Lynell Hamilton? We have TWO other backs doing what he does. We only have one Reggie.

And he is the best choice for third downs, except for maybe 3rd and 1, although he converted his one attempt just fine last week. Bush has better hands, runs better routes, blocks better (He’s obviously worked hard to improve that), and he’s easily the fastest.

As a passing oriented team, it seems kind of obvious to me that you would want to hold onto a back that excels in the passing game.

Personally, I like what they are doing this year. I though last week was great. Bush didn’t get a lot of touches, but he was in for a good chunk of plays. Everyone got their chances and everyone did pretty well. It may not have showed in stats for each, but they all contributed. It’s not, “Don’t fix it if it ain’t broke.” It’s, “Don’t fix it if it works well,” because it obviously has been.

The people who say, "Winning isn't everything," don't win very often.

If stupidity is a cancer, you're terminal.

When you die and go to hell, you come back as a Jets fan.

by Hooahsaint on Oct 23, 2009 7:40 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I actually didn’t mention his fumbling at all, though that is another frustrating aspect of his performance thusfar this season. As far as being a third down back for less money goes, that would be great, if anyone was sitting down to talk contracts 5 or 6 games into the season. The only time any player does that is toward the end of their contract (Reggie’s not in his contract year), toward the end of the season, when full scale performance evaluations typically take place (still a long way to go before that), or when they’re initially brought in, assuming it’s through free agency. The latter doesn’t apply to Reggie at all, obviously, but it DOES apply to a number of other players at other positions that could conceivably help us on the whole more than Reggie does. The frustration on my part (and for many others, from what I gather) therein lies in the potential opportunities to get better being squandered in favor or a player who is, in all likelihood already peaked as a professional athlete. As I’ve already mentioned, there are others whose mere existence on the roster frustrates me also, just not to the extent of #25’s. #19 is another culprit of providing too little, far too often. Quite frankly, I was dumbfounded when they elected to re-sign Devery this past offseason. The guy is about as enigmatic as any WR we’ve had since Larry Burton. Leads the league in drops and drop percentage twice, leads the league in yards per catch twice. To Henderson’s credit, he hasn’t dropped any passes this season (at least to my recollection, anyway), he signed a ridiculously cheap contract by UFA standards to stay here (probably because he has family in Opelousas) and he isn’t depended on heavily in the offense, despite starting. He’s also come up big, the few times his number’s been called this season. Reggie probably fits about 20% of that “all that’s right about Devery” synopsis. That being the “he isn’t depended on heavily in the offense, despite starting” part. All of that being said, it wouldn’t bother me in the least, if Devery was axed tomorrow in favor of a more dependable and/or talented receiver of equal or lesser monetary value. And believe me, there’s quite a few sitting around twiddling their thumbs right now. If it weren’t for Henderson’s familiarity with the offense and probably a healthy dose of brown-nosing behind closed doors, I’m sure the guy would have been gone a couple of seasons ago. Please try to convince me that Henderson’s a better all around WR than Doug Gabriel, who’s currently playing in the UFL. On second thought, don’t waste your time. He isn’t. Mega-tangent there. I just wanted to illustrate that it isn’t just a beef I have with Reggie. I try my hardest to see the picture from every angle with every player. Unfortunately for some, that includes the money they’re earning (or not earning, depending on your perspective).

"Paralyze resistance with persistence" -Woody Hayes

by coldpizza on Oct 23, 2009 8:33 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

“As far as third string RBs go, I’d definitely take Shonn Greene … over Bush”.

In case you missed it:

Shonn Greene: 19 carries, 144 yards (7.58 ypc), 2 TDs today.

Wake me up the next time Bush is anywhere close to that productive.

"Paralyze resistance with persistence" -Woody Hayes

by coldpizza on Oct 25, 2009 9:19 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

lol

19 carries is all that’s needed to refute yourself…lol you’re hilarious coldpizza, hilarious!!!!

Don't worry I got your back cuz...

by TAYDIGGA on Oct 25, 2009 10:58 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Bush has had 19+ carries three times in his career and has never come close to that type of performance. Again, we’re talking about a rookie third-string RB.

"Paralyze resistance with persistence" -Woody Hayes

by coldpizza on Oct 26, 2009 1:52 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

They played Oakland. It’s really not saying much. The final was 38-0.

The people who say, "Winning isn't everything," don't win very often.

If stupidity is a cancer, you're terminal.

When you die and go to hell, you come back as a Jets fan.

by Hooahsaint on Oct 26, 2009 2:27 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Can't live your life in fear

if we have injuries, we deal with them. Most teams have injuries and it often is the single most significant factor as to how much of a contender many teams are. Can’t worry about Bell and PT, we have Bush, Hamilton and Hill – you can’t expect to have Frank Gore backing up Bell and PT and then Fred Taylor on the PS. Our team is as deep as any team in the NFL amd that’s the best you can ask for. After that you just have to hope for the best. It really seems sad to dis one of our guys this bad who has contributed to a thus far undefeated season and also helped our team go to the NFC Championship game just a short time ago. Reggie is going nowhere as far as a trade. Get over it.

"Indecision may or may not be my biggest problem" - Jimmy Buffett

by Philinwood on Oct 23, 2009 6:52 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

I just meant in terms of that particular game. I’m sure if both Thomas and Bell went down with serious injuries. we’d go out and sign a two more no-namers that would come in and quickly outperform Bush in the running game, like practically every other back that’s share a professional roster with him so far in his career. That’s not to say our running game wouldn’t suffer from such a drastic setback, though. There’s quite a bit of leeway between “Reggie Bush level” ground production and “just enough to keep you on the edge of your seat” ground production. Since you follow the team just as closely as I do, I’ll let you be the judge on which is closer to ideal.

"Paralyze resistance with persistence" -Woody Hayes

by coldpizza on Oct 23, 2009 7:22 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Wow, you really REALLY don’t like him. Are you Kim’s ex-boyfriend or something? If you are, I’m jealous.

The people who say, "Winning isn't everything," don't win very often.

If stupidity is a cancer, you're terminal.

When you die and go to hell, you come back as a Jets fan.

by Hooahsaint on Oct 23, 2009 7:42 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Nah, she said she couldn’t handle what I’m toting. I had to pass her along.

"Paralyze resistance with persistence" -Woody Hayes

by coldpizza on Oct 23, 2009 8:37 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

So she didn’t understand your sarcasm? You have to be blunt with stupid chicks, you should know that.

The people who say, "Winning isn't everything," don't win very often.

If stupidity is a cancer, you're terminal.

When you die and go to hell, you come back as a Jets fan.

by Hooahsaint on Oct 24, 2009 9:26 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

yeah he doesn't like him...

borderline jealousy. The comment about Reggies diamond earrings he made earlier tipped that off for me. He prob hates USC too. Doesn’t surprise me. hilarious, just gotta laugh at it…

Don't worry I got your back cuz...

by TAYDIGGA on Oct 23, 2009 3:43 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yep. Probably about as jealous as you were of Jason David.

"Paralyze resistance with persistence" -Woody Hayes

by coldpizza on Oct 23, 2009 9:15 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I HATE USC!

The only reason they are in the Top 10 if not the Top 25 each season is because LA is such a big media market. They would get annihilated in the SEC. Pete Carroll knows this, and he knows USC isn’t a powerhouse. The only big name school I’ve seen USC book (Aside from the standard ones they must play like Cal, Oregon) is Ohio State, which they only chose to book based on all of the starters Ohio State lost.

LSU, Florida, Arkansas, Georgia, Alabama, and probably even Auburn would wipe the floor with them. I’d argue that Tennessee and South Carolina could make a game of it, if not the rest of the conference. No USC = trash.

The people who say, "Winning isn't everything," don't win very often.

If stupidity is a cancer, you're terminal.

When you die and go to hell, you come back as a Jets fan.

by Hooahsaint on Oct 24, 2009 9:25 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I love USC!

Was there last night for the Nike run…
That’s speculation Hooahsaint but I will say that the Pac-10 is weak for sure. The Ohio state and Pete Carroll part—purely a projection.

And I’m so jealous of Jason David with his…
and his…
uugh well I just don’t like him.

lol

Don't worry I got your back cuz...

by TAYDIGGA on Oct 24, 2009 1:07 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

If it looks like a duck . . .

The people who say, "Winning isn't everything," don't win very often.

If stupidity is a cancer, you're terminal.

When you die and go to hell, you come back as a Jets fan.

by Hooahsaint on Oct 25, 2009 12:02 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

uhhhh

5 – 0
6 – 0 soon?

and you all are complaining why?

huh?

by doublewide on Oct 23, 2009 3:35 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

There's a lot of time to fill in a standard workweek

"Brees will kill you, but he lets you decide how fast he tightens the garrote." -Chris Brown

by FuSoYa on Oct 24, 2009 10:27 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

how true you are!

I am a jack of all, and master of none

by doublewide on Oct 24, 2009 6:19 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

I bet ya

If Bush scores the winning TD against the fish, CP will be the 1st. to #%$ in his jeans.

A SAINT in Panther country

by carolinasaintsfan on Oct 25, 2009 12:13 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

He’s scored the winning TD in a game before. So has Ki-Jana Carter. For the Saints, even.

"Paralyze resistance with persistence" -Woody Hayes

by coldpizza on Oct 25, 2009 1:15 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Reggie could lead the team in rushing or the NFC for that matter, and there would still be haters or people mentioning that another back could’ve done better given the the same opportunities.

People either like him or hate him. That’s just the way it is.

The people who say, "Winning isn't everything," don't win very often.

If stupidity is a cancer, you're terminal.

When you die and go to hell, you come back as a Jets fan.

by Hooahsaint on Oct 25, 2009 11:57 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

reggie made an AWESOME TD!!! picture perfect “lets get this shit done” play

I am a jack of all, and master of none

by doublewide on Oct 25, 2009 7:45 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Yep. Kind of made up for the three drives he killed in the first half with dropped passes, didn’t he?

"Paralyze resistance with persistence" -Woody Hayes

by coldpizza on Oct 25, 2009 8:21 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

don't be a douche

Two of those blown passes were on Drew.

by HB-NOLA on Oct 25, 2009 8:23 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Oh, please. They hit him in both hands. Did Robert Meachem not go up and take not one, but TWO passes away from Giants defenders in similiarly tight coverage? Bush also fell on his face in the backfield without anyone touching him. I’m not saying the leap wasn’t a spectacularly athletic play, but holy cr*p, how about looking at the whole picture?

"Paralyze resistance with persistence" -Woody Hayes

by coldpizza on Oct 25, 2009 8:33 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yes, exactly like that. The one that the defender stole from him on the goal line was inexcusable, imo. Not the wisest of passes by Brees either, but still Colston should have brought it in. He’s too big to be getting outmuscled like that.

"Paralyze resistance with persistence" -Woody Hayes

by coldpizza on Oct 25, 2009 9:56 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

so why are Reggie's mistakes

so much more devastating for you? Is it just the money? Colston makes about $3mil/year now I think.

by HB-NOLA on Oct 25, 2009 10:01 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Bush isn’t a receiver, he’s a runningback. I’d not expect many receivers to have even made those catches, the DB had his hands on the ball at impact.

It WAS Reggie’s fault for not running the route right and coming back directly toward Drew, so he could shield the defender. Again though, I fault him being a runningback for that.

The people who say, "Winning isn't everything," don't win very often.

If stupidity is a cancer, you're terminal.

When you die and go to hell, you come back as a Jets fan.

by Hooahsaint on Oct 26, 2009 1:01 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

If that’s the excuse, don’t throw to him. When he’s not producing on the ground, he’s “so much more than a RB”. When he’s not producing in any other capacity, he’s “just a RB”. I think that averages out to just above worthless. Unless you’re REALLY, REALLY into track & field events, I mean.

"Paralyze resistance with persistence" -Woody Hayes

by coldpizza on Oct 26, 2009 1:57 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

What are you talking about? He still has great hands for a runningback. All I’m saying is you can’t fault him for dropping passes that wide receivers would have dropped. That’s just crazy.

Reggie could’ve run the route better, but those were two passes Brees should not have thrown regardless. Dial back the hate a bit. There were other plays Bush messed up, but I’d hardly call those two smoking guns.

If you want to get onto him, he had one not so good block on a blitz where he didn’t get a strong enough pop on the guy. I believe it led to a sack. Even that was partially Drew’s fault, because he didn’t step up in the pocket.

The people who say, "Winning isn't everything," don't win very often.

If stupidity is a cancer, you're terminal.

When you die and go to hell, you come back as a Jets fan.

by Hooahsaint on Oct 26, 2009 2:32 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

alright pizza

Reggie dove 18 freaking feet for a touchdown. Last week, he out ran the Giants LBs to the edge for a TD.

Pierre floundered when trying to pick up a blitz at least twice today, and gave up at least one sack. Reggie’s blitz blocking has been great this year.

Is Reggie’s yards/touch still the be-all, end-all stat for you? The guy is an elite athlete and he’s proving it week in and week out.

by HB-NOLA on Oct 25, 2009 8:23 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

LOL whatever you say. He’s definitely in a league of his own, I’ll give you that.

"Paralyze resistance with persistence" -Woody Hayes

by coldpizza on Oct 25, 2009 8:34 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

agreed..

I still think he hasn’tbeen having the best of seasons… BUT that doesnt mean hes out… i mean shockey dropped a ball… but he was definitly needed this game..

brees couldnt even think strait in the first half…. if you look at his throws that ball is lucky not to be going end over end… its probably a little of both at fault here…

i stand next to my posts before… i think bush should stay, he is young and he will continue making good plays… he may not be MVP , but who cares?

only one in my mind should be mvp and that is BREEZUS! why? because white boy can effing JUMP did anyone else see that?

I am a jack of all, and master of none

by doublewide on Oct 25, 2009 9:22 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Brees has been getting a ton of balls tipped or batted down these last few games. And of course, he’s passing less often than in years past, so that likely makes it a higher percentage. I wonder how much of that is on the OL, not maintaining the convex of the pocket. Just like on blocked FGs, if they’re giving up ground in the trenches, the trajectory angle is going to be lower at the point of the DL’s leap. Think a hotly contested shot block in basketball, versus a futile air swat from several feet away, goaltending, etc. You know how they have those completion breakdown maps by zone? Short left, short middle, intermediate right, deep left, etc.? I’d like to see an illustrated recap of all of Drew’s deflected passes, based on how far out the defender was from him and at what angle.

"Paralyze resistance with persistence" -Woody Hayes

by coldpizza on Oct 25, 2009 9:42 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

good questions!

I’ll have to look at the game again soon to see if the D keep their form or not…

but don’t forget brees isnt the tallest qb out there, and thier 4 were monsters all close to or above 300+ lbs, and 6’0" and above (if memory serves me)

but that is something that should be brought up in next weeks practices, as well as all the sacks!!!

I am a jack of all, and master of none

by doublewide on Oct 25, 2009 9:51 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah, I mean I know he’s short by NFL starting QB standards. I guess the defender’s height would be a good information to have on such an illustration, as well. Some sort of inches tall to feet from the QB ratio?

"Paralyze resistance with persistence" -Woody Hayes

by coldpizza on Oct 25, 2009 9:59 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

yeah

i just remember a game or 2 ago him lobbing the ball… it looked uglyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy i wondered then if that was him making bad throws or him not seeing anyone well until he jumped? lol

thats how my mind works

I am a jack of all, and master of none

by doublewide on Oct 25, 2009 10:00 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

O-Line failed in the first quarter

what’s your point? So did Pierre, in running and blocking. Every time I saw Pierre fall down trying to pick up a blitz, I was wishing Reggie was there.

by HB-NOLA on Oct 25, 2009 9:58 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Thomas failed on running, but Bush didn’t? He averaged more yards per carry than him for probably the 30th time in his career. Granted, it wasn’t a good day for either, but what exactly is YOUR point? It’s like you’re a dog burrowing for a treat in the junkyard. OMG, a milkbone with just TWO maggots on it! Good FIND, Fido! If Reggie’s such a great pass blocker, let’s convert him to FB and keep the ball out of his hands. Oh and maybe pay him like one, while we’re at it. Oh wait, then we’d never get to see Dominique Wilkins highlight leaps once every 75 carries. Well heck, scratch that idea and christen him the permanent starter and every position but punter.

"Paralyze resistance with persistence" -Woody Hayes

by coldpizza on Oct 25, 2009 10:09 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

“let’s convert him to FB”

FB being fullback, not Facebook. I know I probably just confused the living hell out of you with that.

"Paralyze resistance with persistence" -Woody Hayes

by coldpizza on Oct 25, 2009 10:12 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

my point is

Reggie is a better blocker, better receiver, and occasionally a better runner than Pierre, and almost always better than Bell and Hill.

Sometimes he’s not. Sometimes Colston isn’t as good a receiver as Henderson. So what? Presumably you don’t have any great urge for Loomis to trade Marques, do you?

by HB-NOLA on Oct 25, 2009 10:24 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Colston produces on a weekly basis. I also disagree with roughly half of your first sentence.

"Paralyze resistance with persistence" -Woody Hayes

by coldpizza on Oct 25, 2009 10:38 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

lol

maybe a face book position would work too?

I am a jack of all, and master of none

by doublewide on Oct 25, 2009 10:18 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

quit arguing with this dude...

it’s fruitless, we’ll just keep getting these dissertations peppered with condescending dashes of what he thinks…tired of it

Don't worry I got your back cuz...

by TAYDIGGA on Oct 25, 2009 11:10 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Well

It would just be meen leaving him with a broken toy and shooting air balls that Dominique Wilkins goal tends. Haha

by ReggieVilma on Oct 25, 2009 11:21 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

True. At least he served some tangible purpose today.

"Paralyze resistance with persistence" -Woody Hayes

by coldpizza on Oct 26, 2009 1:59 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Running the ball is just one aspect of a runningback’s duties. One of the most noteworthy, but just one in any case. Reggie is better in all other categories save running the football, per your arguments over ypc.

Don’t bring out yards per catch stats either. That doesn’t prove anything. Receivers are only able to run the routes they are given. Reggie runs all of the swings, which means he’s started out behind the line, so that argument is worthless.

He’s still in New Orleans and still an important part of the offense, because he can do what Thomas and Bell can’t, period.

I personally thought Bell looked the best yesterday, especially since it wasn’t until he got the run game going, that the offense really started to look good. Even so, you have to give Bush some credit on the touchdown run. There’s only a handfull of people that could have made that play . . . all time. Shonn Green sure as shit couldn’t have done it.

The people who say, "Winning isn't everything," don't win very often.

If stupidity is a cancer, you're terminal.

When you die and go to hell, you come back as a Jets fan.

by Hooahsaint on Oct 26, 2009 1:12 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

He would have had to. The defender was already committed (diving) to the sidelines and Stinchcomb was out in front of Bush. All any halfway speedy RB in the league would have to do is cut it back inside, in that situation. Hell, even a bigger back could have probably bowled it in, with that head of steam. Bush doesn’t see the entire field, so he goes airborne unnecessarily. He also went untouched. I’ve seen Deuce McAllister flat run over a Falcons defender and leap into the end zone from roughly that far out. Funny that of the handful of people who could make that play all-time, two are from the same team.

"Paralyze resistance with persistence" -Woody Hayes

by coldpizza on Oct 26, 2009 2:09 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Then it wouldn’t be THAT play, it would be running someone over or making some kind of cutback, and I have to disagree. The cutback wasn’t there. Maybe the Deuce run-over, but I doubt that too. It was a great play, one of very few this year, but still a great play. Give the guy a little credit, it won’t kill you.

The people who say, "Winning isn't everything," don't win very often.

If stupidity is a cancer, you're terminal.

When you die and go to hell, you come back as a Jets fan.

by Hooahsaint on Oct 26, 2009 2:36 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

The cutback was definitely there. Watch the replay. Ronnie Brown would have taken it back inside and scored 10 out of 10 times on that play. This isn’t a slam dunk contest. There’s nothing special about technique. A TD is worth 6 points no matter how you chalk it up. That in response to “no other human being alive can leap 18 feet in the air”. Even if that was 100% true, what makes it such a “great” play? It was 2nd and 7 from the 10. Up to five conventional offensive plays can be run in that situation, before it’s go-for-broke. Even Reggie himself averages over two yards a carry. You make it sound as if their backs were pinned to the wall and Reggie saved the day with his Superman leap. He provided the finishing touches on a three play drive. Congratulations, Reggie. You’re a minor cog in the most prolific offense in the league. I think we need a “it’s too early to give up on John Carney” thread. You know, being that he outscored Reggie 10-6, DESPITE having a sh*tty day. I mean, as long as we’re winning and he’s a part of that effort, no matter how insignificantly, he should be praised. What a phenomenal 46 yd FG in the first half. Only a handful of kickers in the history of the league could drill one from that far out. Yep, sure wish I could my boy John a cold one after that Pro Bowl performance.

"Paralyze resistance with persistence" -Woody Hayes

by coldpizza on Oct 26, 2009 12:53 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah, loved the missed field goal and shanked extra point.

The people who say, "Winning isn't everything," don't win very often.

If stupidity is a cancer, you're terminal.

When you die and go to hell, you come back as a Jets fan.

by Hooahsaint on Oct 26, 2009 5:53 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Let’s not dwell on the negative. Carney is a contributing member of an undefeated team! Isn’t that the prescribed song and dance?

"Paralyze resistance with persistence" -Woody Hayes

by coldpizza on Oct 27, 2009 7:15 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Psshhh, that ain’t my stance! Time to bring in the youngsta!

The people who say, "Winning isn't everything," don't win very often.

If stupidity is a cancer, you're terminal.

When you die and go to hell, you come back as a Jets fan.

by Hooahsaint on Oct 27, 2009 12:57 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

He wouldn’t have had to.

"Paralyze resistance with persistence" -Woody Hayes

by coldpizza on Oct 26, 2009 2:09 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Are you serious!?

Yeah, you’re an official Hater! He scores and instead of at least just saying, “yeah good job,” you talk about how he “should’ve” ran it in. You’re hilarious. At this point guys I hope you know we’re arguing with a hater. It’s not like how Philinwood and I use to argue—this dude just hate B just to hate. It’s hard not to laugh at this hateration. It’s pathetic yes but still very funny, let the dude hate.

Don't worry I got your back cuz...

by TAYDIGGA on Oct 26, 2009 5:08 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

I will say this though...

excluding punt returns, my boy only got what, 6 touches? Sure maybe he would’ve had 7 or 8. And he didn’t look to be still nursing that knee after that superman dive. Not looking like Payton utilizing him that much. Again, will he be here next year? I don’t think him not restructuring his contract will be the issue. It’ll be about him being able to be used enough to feel like he’s earning his keep and bettering his career…

Don't worry I got your back cuz...

by TAYDIGGA on Oct 26, 2009 5:18 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

He’s in a lot, he just doesn’t always get touches. They had him in for more plays than the other two backs; they were mostly pass plays, though. He did have a limited number of runs from scrimmage, but I think he’s still having to earn those touches back. I don’t think Payton was very happy about the fumbles early-on. I’m guessing there is going to be a few more carries for Bush next week as well as Bell. They’ll probably each get right around 10 with a few more going to whomever is having a good game that day.

The people who say, "Winning isn't everything," don't win very often.

If stupidity is a cancer, you're terminal.

When you die and go to hell, you come back as a Jets fan.

by Hooahsaint on Oct 26, 2009 6:46 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

TAY

I think you are basically right. CP just basically doesn’t like Reggie at all and will not give him credit at all. It seems to stem from College football. I feel I have been much more objective and open minded. At this point I realize Reggie’s value. I no longer care about how much he gets paid, Payloo have succeeded in putting a quality team together with great chemistry, depth and talent and still pay Reggie big bucks. That is no longer any of my concern since we have the team to win it all, we just need to play to our potential like we did in the second half yesterday, but clearly not in the 1st half. Reggie has made plays that no one on the roster can make, that very few if any in the NFL can make. Having Reggie on the roster iss like owning a Honda and A Maserati and you only take the Maserati out for special occasions. It’s still worth having the Maserati. That kind of talented person on your roster will always cost you a premium. Would I like to see Reggie make more great plays? The answer is only if it means a Saints victory. That’s the only thing that counts.

"Indecision may or may not be my biggest problem" - Jimmy Buffett

by Philinwood on Oct 26, 2009 8:34 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

I think the reason Loomis got so little for Stallworth is obvious....

NO ONE WANTED TO GIVE UP ANYTHING FOR THAT LOSER. GUESS WHAT? THEY WERE RIGHT!! If he had value, GMs would have been banging down the doors to get him on their roster!! We got rid of Stallworth for the 2006 season. WE went to the NFC championship game if I remember, and we beat the Eagles in the game to get there. And where was Stallworth?? OH YEAH, HE WAS ON THE EAGLES!!!!! If he was so good, why didn’t he lead them over us in victory!!! Because he is a fraud. The Eagles sent him packing as soon as they could and then so did The Patriots. He landed in NFL purgatory, namely Cleveland. That’s right, Cleveland, where all the current superstars are tripping over each other to get to.

"Indecision may or may not be my biggest problem" - Jimmy Buffett

by Philinwood on Oct 26, 2009 8:47 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

The Eagles didn’t send him packing. His contract was up. He signed a bigger one with the Patriots, then an even bigger one with the Browns. Funny how unwanted players get offered multimillion dollar contracts.

“And where was Stallworth?? OH YEAH, HE WAS ON THE EAGLES!!!!! If he was so good, why didn’t he lead them over us in victory!!! Because he is a fraud.”

He had 3 receptions for 100 yds and a TD in that game. Clearly an exhibition of a player with little to no trade value. Using your unquestionable logic, if Reggie Bush is so good, why didn’t he lead us to victory over the Bears the following week? Perhaps he’s a “fraud”, also. If so, let’s give him the ol’ Mickey Loomis fraud treatment, and move him for a backup LB and a mid-round pick.

"Paralyze resistance with persistence" -Woody Hayes

by coldpizza on Oct 26, 2009 1:07 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Stallworth had 38 receptions in 2006

so, yeah 3 catches was a BIG DAY for him!!! I forgot. He averaged 2.8 catches per game during the time from 2006,07 and 08. WHOOOOOOOAAAA! That’s a guy to hold onto. Almost 3 catches a game!!! Maybe the Patriots wanted him for his blocking!!!! And they got rid of him after his only season when he plummeted down to 5th receiver below Moss, Welker and Gaffney and Watson.. If Brady wanted him, he would have been on the Patriots the following year. They would have offered him bigger bucks. But, he didn’t want him. Wherever he goes they lose. But they let this “prolific” receiver/cancer go!!! And, for the record, Andy Reid didn’t want to resign him and they had every opportunity to do so. They let him go because everytime he got a bruise he sat out 2-3 games.

"Indecision may or may not be my biggest problem" - Jimmy Buffett

by Philinwood on Oct 26, 2009 2:37 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

1. What does his subsequent production have to do with his trade value coming off of a 70 catch season?

2. Andy Reid said they did everything in their power to re-sign him and he walked.

3. New England didn’t get rid of him, either. He signed a one year contract. It’s called unrestricted free agency. Once a player has fulfilled the terms of his contract, he’s free to determine his own future. His prior team has no say in the matter.

4. If Brady wanted him? Is that all it takes? Quick question: why is Deion Branch currently a Seahawk? I guess Tom Brady didn’t want his best receiver, so Branch had no other choice but to sign a lucrative deal with another team. Poor Deion. Like Tom Brady has ANYTHING to do with personnel decisions made in New England. Get a freaking grip.

5. “Wherever he goes they lose.” Hence the Patriots going undefeated in 2007? How ever did they accomplish such a feat with “cancers” like Stallworth and Moss on the roster all season? I guess it might have something to do with talent. Or coaching discipline. Or maybe even a little of both. But hey, don’t quote me.

"Paralyze resistance with persistence" -Woody Hayes

by coldpizza on Oct 26, 2009 2:53 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Reggie Bush had a 91 yard reception in that game which set the tone for the Saints coming back in that game. Had Payton not decided to throw it 3 straight times from inside his 5 . . . ON TWO DIFFERENT SERIES, we may just have won that game.

The people who say, "Winning isn't everything," don't win very often.

If stupidity is a cancer, you're terminal.

When you die and go to hell, you come back as a Jets fan.

by Hooahsaint on Oct 26, 2009 5:57 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

It was 88 yards and I DID say “using your (Philinwood’s) unquestionable logic”, which was sarcasm. Bush’s performance against Chicago had as much bearing on the outcome of the game, as Stallworth’s performance had on the bearing of the Eagles’ loss to the Saints the previous week. “If he was so good, why didn’t he lead them over us in victory!!!” — in all its retarded statement glory — applies equally to both.

"Paralyze resistance with persistence" -Woody Hayes

by coldpizza on Oct 27, 2009 7:25 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

That’s way to smart talk for me this late at night. I’ll just concede you are right.

And I was counting the three step drop by Brees in the 91 :)

The people who say, "Winning isn't everything," don't win very often.

If stupidity is a cancer, you're terminal.

When you die and go to hell, you come back as a Jets fan.

by Hooahsaint on Oct 27, 2009 12:59 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I don't understand

how Reggie keeps getting the pass from his numerous defenders here and abroad. His beautiful six yard leap for a touchdown was unique and helpful, but, in fairness, there are a pile of running backs that could just simply beat a single blocker on the ground to get in the endzone. Not taking that away, but it’s style points are the only thing that Reggie brought specifically. And, like every other reverse he gets good yardage from this year, Drew Brees has to block for him. Exciting to watch, but absolutely not worth the risk.

And then there’s every other time he was in on a play. He couldn’t win his single coverage passes, he got beat on a blitz right in front of the endzone, he couldn’t get out of the backfield as a rusher, and, bad blocking or not, he couldn’t break one tackle in punt returns. Isn’t that something he’s supposed to be good at? I’ll concede that the punt return blocking is abysmal, and I don’t know if anyone could get more than a few yards behind that group of keystone cops, but he certainly doesn’t get to slide on that. It’s his fault as much as anyone else’s. Maybe, if he beat a gunner once in the open field, it would turn out that he had some blockers further up field. They have to be somewhere, right? But we’ll never know, because he can’t get away from anyone.

He was getting plenty of opportunities in the first half, so I don’t know if the “he’s not being given a chance” thing works, because he was stifled, without exception, until his one play in the fourth quarter. And am I the only guy who had terrible flashbacks to another fourth-quarter drive in Florida that culminated in a similar play, only differently? Don’t get me wrong, I was cheering for Reggie when that happened, and I’m glad it worked, but Jesus, what a huge risk! Payton’s got balls, because there was nothing about Reggie’s play that day that would have led me to call his number on a trick play at that point.

By the way, the reason other players get more leeway from me, at least, on bad days, is because they’ve had good days recently. The reason Mike Bell’s scoop-and-score fumble in week 1 didn’t garner boos was because he put up over 100 yards on the ground, and sustained drives all day. The reason Colston doesn’t get a full-on rant about the piss-poor one td day he had yesterday, is because he has so many great days playing his chosen position. And the reason Reggie doesn’t get 20 touches a game is because he can’t survive 16 games that way. Last year, he was putting up respectable numbers from the feature back spot, until he had to miss nearly the entire second half of the season.

What boggles my mind is, how my hope for Reggie’s future in New Orleans dwindles with each passing week, and, from watching the same games, there are people who see the exact opposite. Reggie is coulda/woulda/shoulda, personified.

"Brees will kill you, but he lets you decide how fast he tightens the garrote." -Chris Brown

by FuSoYa on Oct 26, 2009 11:09 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

but can he survive with 15

you base your assessment unfairly…so was Drew’s play risky?

Don't worry I got your back cuz...

by TAYDIGGA on Oct 26, 2009 5:55 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Drew sucked for much of yesterday…Just not as much as Reggie, in my mind. He finished the day with 3 TD’s and something close to 300 yards. He also gave the ball up 4 times, leading to 17 points for Miami, but again, he put up 18 of his own, so advantage: Brees.

And yeah, it’s looking like 12 or 15 is the magic number for Reggie’s knee health. I’d take 8 or 10, personally, but why eff with success? He just bugs me, is all I’m really saying. See responses below for apologist posturing to promote civility. ;-)

"Brees will kill you, but he lets you decide how fast he tightens the garrote." -Chris Brown

by FuSoYa on Oct 26, 2009 11:40 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Reggie coulda, woulda, shoulda scored an important touchdown that helped change the game.

Oh, wait, …he did…… Seems to me that important game changing TDs should be nothing to thumb your nose at….

3 games this season he did so against the best 3 teams we have played.

"Indecision may or may not be my biggest problem" - Jimmy Buffett

by Philinwood on Oct 26, 2009 11:49 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

He's had ONE game-changing TD

It was this week, and it gets respect, no question. His big catch-and-run in Philly was impressive and important, too. But he was gut-punching his own team for about 50 out of 60 minutes of two games this season, including yesterday. And he won’t so much as dive forward on punts, which would be a damn sight better than what he does, every time. I have a hard time thumbing my nose at that.

"Brees will kill you, but he lets you decide how fast he tightens the garrote." -Chris Brown

by FuSoYa on Oct 26, 2009 12:15 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

are you seeing the coverage on those

two of them he couldn’t let go and got hit immediately! Come on man! I guess we’re on two diff bandwagons, I can admit that.

Don't worry I got your back cuz...

by TAYDIGGA on Oct 26, 2009 5:57 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Coverage sucks

No doubt. But I’d take the five over the elliptical runs that result in no gain or loss. I know it’s his “thing”, and sometimes it works beautifully, but I am personally running out of patience with him. No hard feelings or anything. But I am still amazed at how we can watch the same game and fixate on different things to form completely opposite opinions! The wonders of the human mind…Etc., etc.

"Brees will kill you, but he lets you decide how fast he tightens the garrote." -Chris Brown

by FuSoYa on Oct 26, 2009 11:34 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I agree with some of what you said previous, but I distinctly remember him breaking 4 or 5 tackles on one of those punt plays. In the end it only went for about 10 yards, but he did everything he could to get those yards.

The people who say, "Winning isn't everything," don't win very often.

If stupidity is a cancer, you're terminal.

When you die and go to hell, you come back as a Jets fan.

by Hooahsaint on Oct 26, 2009 6:01 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I can't watch again

I saw other mentions of a good punt return yesterday, though I honestly don’t remember it. Sometimes his dancing works. I can admit that. I think the sum of his play takes away from his one or two shining moments in a game. He’s like Aaron Brooks to me. I never hated him. I really liked him, in fact, and during his first full year, I kept telling people, ’They’re forcing him into the pocket! He’s not comfortable there! If they just let him play his game, we can win with him!’ Each subsequent year, my arguments for him got weaker and weaker, until Brees came along, and I got to see what a real qb could do in N.O. I still think they coached Brooks into obscurity, but, honestly, he wasn’t ever “great”.

  I try to keep my hopes up for Reggie, but I really think he’s regressing this year, when he has yet to reach his mythic “potential” in the first place. All I can say is, personally, I’m grinding my teeth for about 13 of the 15 times a game I notice him.

"Brees will kill you, but he lets you decide how fast he tightens the garrote." -Chris Brown

by FuSoYa on Oct 26, 2009 11:30 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think in Phila it was a handoff for a 19 yd td run (and it was up the middle!).

And against the Giants it was a handoff that went off the left edge on a kick out block. Pretty soon you guys are going to be like Buddy Ryan and his famous quote about Cris Carter. “Buddy, why did you trade Cris Carter away?” Buddy- “All he ever does is score touchdowns!” I still say if it’s not broke, don’t fix it. Don’t think about getting rid of even the waterboy when you are undefeated. And, from my perspective, there were Saints that did a lot worse than Reggie in the first half. Reggies has also had some important 1st downs too but no one has given him credit for that either.

And I don’t see where Reggie was “gut punching his team for 50 of 60 minutes.” he had no blocking on punts or most of the time he ran the ball. If you look at the stats, a lot of our runs in the first half went almost nowhere. Our passing game was gut punching our team early on more than anything else, with interceptions and dropped balls. Reggie’s impact on most of the plays was minimal and he hardly touched the ball.

"Indecision may or may not be my biggest problem" - Jimmy Buffett

by Philinwood on Oct 26, 2009 2:11 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

“Reggie’s impact on most of the plays was minimal and he hardly touched the ball.”

Is that a summarization of the Dolphins game or his professional career?

"Paralyze resistance with persistence" -Woody Hayes

by coldpizza on Oct 26, 2009 2:38 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Sorry, I forgot you got elected into the Hall of Fame, uh, what year was it???

"Indecision may or may not be my biggest problem" - Jimmy Buffett

by Philinwood on Oct 26, 2009 2:39 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

"Buddy, why did you trade Cris Carter away?" Buddy- "All he ever does is score touchdowns!"

Buddy Ryan’s famous quote involves asking HIMSELF why he traded Cris Carter? Well, there’s some insightful second-guessing. Hell, not only did he put himself on the spot, he avoided his own question with a Chris Berman cliche. Nice work, Buddy.

“Sorry, I forgot you got elected into the Hall of Fame, uh, what year was it???”

Your incessant babbling has grown tiresome. Now is the time on Sprockets when we dance.

"Paralyze resistance with persistence" -Woody Hayes

by coldpizza on Oct 26, 2009 3:10 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

paint the kettle black much?

incessant babbling: See nearly all of oldpizza’s post.

Lol

Don't worry I got your back cuz...

by TAYDIGGA on Oct 26, 2009 5:52 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Okay, the argument’s starting to devolve a bit.

The people who say, "Winning isn't everything," don't win very often.

If stupidity is a cancer, you're terminal.

When you die and go to hell, you come back as a Jets fan.

by Hooahsaint on Oct 26, 2009 6:04 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Sprockets ? That's not babbling?

I just find the condescending attitude about Reggie, who is a word class professional athlete by a , well I don’t know what you are but I know you are not and never have been a professional athlete, very pathetic. It’s one thing to add insight, have debate, point out different aspects of a team or player. But to have a vendetta and give him no credit and to attack him incessantly pretty much anonomously, well there is no other word but pathetic. He’s one of us, yes us, the 2009 New Orleans Saints team and fan base and the team just happens to be undefeated so having a vendetta against a guy with such immense talent is sad and says loads about you.

"Indecision may or may not be my biggest problem" - Jimmy Buffett

by Philinwood on Oct 26, 2009 7:03 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

TAY

I like that- OLDPIZZA- I’m assuming that’s NOT A TYPO!!

"Indecision may or may not be my biggest problem" - Jimmy Buffett

by Philinwood on Oct 26, 2009 7:04 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

nope!

Don't worry I got your back cuz...

by TAYDIGGA on Oct 26, 2009 7:22 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

What’s the deal with all this Reggie hating? We are 6-0 and Bush is as much a part of that as any player on this team. Lets face it, we are New Orleans Saints fans… We get a good team once a decade and we have been truly blessed to see this team turn around so quickly . Moreover, we are legitimate SUPERBOWL CONTENDERS and we are on our way to locking up home field through the playoffs. Lets not waste any more time this season bashing Bush. Lets CHEER FOR HIM AND OUR TEAM and give them as much good karma as we possibly can. The less pressure Bush on to be the next Gayle Sayers or whomever, the better.

Just a few thoughts as I ran through these posts:

1) Bush cannot transition to a receiver…see Eric Metcalf.
2) Trade him: For what? A journeyman LB, 5th RD PK, or a S/T player…PUH-LEASE!!!!
3) How quickly we all forgot how important Reggie was during the 2006 season. If you don’t think that Payton has some special stuff dialed up for him come playoffs your crazy.

by jray2000 on Oct 26, 2009 11:37 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

nice J

totally agree!

Don't worry I got your back cuz...

by TAYDIGGA on Oct 27, 2009 11:43 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Okay, let's end something right here.

Being 6-0 does not make a case for someone being good enough to keep. You don’t stop fixing issues and making tweaks, because you’re doing well at the present moment. Someone is always working harder than you, wants your position and is doing everything in their power to take it. If you aren’t always seeking to improve, you’ll pay dearly.

That being said, I don’t think getting rid of Bush is an improvement on the team. Bottom line. I do think getting some more athletic linebackers is, though.

The people who say, "Winning isn't everything," don't win very often.

If stupidity is a cancer, you're terminal.

When you die and go to hell, you come back as a Jets fan.

by Hooahsaint on Oct 27, 2009 1:02 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Fair Enough Hooahsaint, but...

My point is let the GM and Benson handle that AFTER the season. RIGHT NOW, lets be glad WE ARE WINNING and do everything we can to support the Saints and the players. We are riding high right now…all this “is he worth it,” “what can we get for him,” “he’s not as good as so and so” talk is speculative at best and hurtful at its worst. Saints fans have suffered too long to waste this opportunity debating what is next. We have all seen what is next. It would be inexcusable to screw this opportunity up.

by jray2000 on Oct 27, 2009 10:57 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

I agree, but some things just will never change.

I think Reggie won’t really produce a lot as far as stats are concerned, but I see his averages improving throughout the season. He’ll make some plays, like in the last game. In the end, I notice him doing some good things with how he is running the ball now. He’s still hesitating a bit too much. I’m hoping that him seeing the success of PT and Bell will help him to finally develop and realize his potential.

The people who say, "Winning isn't everything," don't win very often.

If stupidity is a cancer, you're terminal.

When you die and go to hell, you come back as a Jets fan.

by Hooahsaint on Oct 29, 2009 9:17 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

The ultimate community for lovers of all things Black and Gold! The latest news, commentary, discussion, linkage and more! Join in the conversation now with all of your fellow Who Dats!
Start posting about the Saints »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

Connect_with_facebook

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Chef_small
Dear New Orleans Saints,
Small
SB Nation Survey + Chance to donate $500 to a charity of this community's choice
John_small
Group hug

Recent FanPosts

Grizz-01_small
"With the Second pick in the 2006 NFL Draft, The New Orleans Saints select..."
Chef_small
Grassroots Effort to Help Displaced Who Dats
Reuters139977872609180022_big_small
A couple of items on Hargrove and Sharper
Grizz-01_small
Homegrown Saints...aka 'there's something in the water'
Mickey_shades_small
CSC Book Club selection: Tales From The Saints Sidelines, by Jeff Duncan
Zzzzwww_small
Mocking the Draft after 4 rds- Saints rep
Magicattack_small
Adam "Pacman" Jones
John_small
Will the Saints suffer a let-down?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Featured Poll

Poll
Is the Saints 2010 off-season the most boring ever?

  231 votes | Results

We're on Twitter!

Click here to start following Da Chronic! Tweet, tweet!

Twitter-logo_medium

SBNation.com Recent Stories

Photo link

Report: Dolphins RB Ronnie Brown Arrested On Friday

Photo

Mike Holmgren On Jimmy Clausen: 'It Would Be Hard For Me To Take Him'

Photo link

Pacman Jones' Workout With Lions Reportedly Goes Well

More from SBNation.com >

Latest NFL Headlines from SB Nation

Niners Nation
Golden Nuggets: Not very good company.
Turf Show Times
Random Ramsdom: 3/22/2010
Acme Packing Company
Diamond In The Rough: Anthony Levine

Head Coach

Lombardi-trophy_full_small Saintsational

Offensive Coordinator (Contributor)

John_small MtnExile

Small Hap Glaudi's Ghost

Saintslogo_small saints-nation