Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Knicks Beat Lakers With Familiar Strategy

Even After Patriots, Saints Still Have More to Prove

Well, Saints fans, I was wrong and I've got to come clean yet again. After handily defeating the New England Patriots a few weeks ago, I thought the Saints had answered any and all questions remaining about their "talent, moxie, depth and drive." I still can't believe how good they looked against the greatest franchise of the decade. The Saints play - I'm talking about their defense here- these last two weeks following that impressive victory, however, has got me raising my eyebrows...again.

Initially, I was going to write this post last week after the Miracle in Maryland but I didn't want to go the negative route. Not with everyone feeling so great; not this season. We should all be soaking in this moment and no matter what, the Saints are still unbeaten. Then another squeaker in Atlanta this past Sunday and it's beginning to become evident that the Saints defense, from an on-field performance standpoint, is just not playing at the same high level we saw earlier in the year and that we know they are capable of achieving. Damnit, I just can't keep it bottled up anymore!

Star-divide

Why does it matter, right? The past is past, the Saints are still perfect and real fans don't think like that. It matters because more than I want to see the Saints do something they've never done before - put together a perfect season - I want to see them do something else they've never been able to accomplish: Win an NFC Championship game or more. That's how real fans think. This isn't about winning and losing during the regular season, it's about playing the best football a team can play when it counts the most. If the Saints continue to play mediocre defense, leading them to barely beat equally mediocre teams like Washington and Atlanta and relying too much on good fortune, how am I supposed to believe they have a chance against the cream of the crop in the playoffs? 

While driving in my car last night I was listening to Deke and Bobby on WWL's Sports Talk. I believe Hebert was mumbling about another team when he used the old football truism, Teams want to peak in December as they head into the playoffs. I agree with thatNaturally I had to think about whether or not this applied to the Saints right now and I didn't like the answer I'd come to. While the Saints have certainly reached the zenith of the standings and their own franchise's success, that is not how I would describe the defenses on-field performance as of late. In fact, looking back on the entire season so far, I'd say they were playing their best football somewhere between week two and week five. They had a swagger back then, when they would beat teams into the ground and not just pray on the bench for a kicker to miss a crucial field goal. You remember it. That swagger is faint now. 

If any of this sounds familiar it's because I felt the same way in November when the lowly Rams gave the Saints a run for their money and I questioned how they could possibly get it together for a juggernaut the likes of the Patriots. Fortunately, I was proven wrong when the Saints used the New England game to show the entire country that they were for real. They brought back the swagger. Unfortunately, their dominance in that game was a mere blip on the radar. We've seen evidence of last years defense since then and it has cracked open the door for concern yet again about what's most important to any good football team in December: Going deep into the playoffs. Because if there's any truth to the other old adage, Defense wins championships, then the Saints are in for trouble as it stands today.

Of course I care very much about seeing the Saints get a win against the Cowboys and continuing their journey toward perfection. That would be sweet. But what's even more important this weekend is seeing them play with a defense chock full of swagger, proving they can turn it on when they need and that they will be ready to make that all-important playoff run. Even if they somehow lose. Soon, they won't have that luxury. 

Comment 66 comments  |  5 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

This...

is exactly the kind of thinking I questioned with my fanpost the other day.

We know the Saints have not played well the last 2 weeks, but they’ve won. THEY’VE WON! Which is more than they can say for last year when they lost 5 by a FG or fewer points.

I don’t think anyone is discounting how tough a time we’ve had defending the pass. But, it will be a lot better with Greer, Porter, and Fujita for the playoff run.

But, now you (and apparently Bobby Hebert) are making the tired argument that you need to play well in December to play well in January. We only need to look to last year to find out how wront that argument is. Just look at what the Cardinals did last season.

Look, everyone (especially on the road) is going to give us their best. That’s part of being the best in the league. Yes, we’ve played down to our opponents some this year, but we’ve still won.

Illusions, Michael. Tricks are what whores do for money...and candy.

by GobBluth on Dec 17, 2009 9:54 AM CST reply actions  

The question is, can we turn our defense back up in the playoffs. The Cardinals did. But they didn’t turn it up for the WHOLE playoffs, only for the first two games. Unfortunately, that wasn’t enough, because I would even cheer for Atlanta to beat the Steelers. Yuk. I think I may puke after typing that, but it’s still true.

Is the problem injuries? If so, our guys should be back in time and we should be fine. Is it they are getting tired? Well the BYE week should help with that. Or is it something else? If so, we better figure it out fast.

Still I think we CAN do it. I just hope we will.

by FriarBob on Dec 17, 2009 9:59 AM CST up reply actions  

The best comparison I can come up with is the 2006 Colts. They were pretty much abysmal on defense through much of that regular season and wound up playing lights out on both sides of the ball in the playoffs. It’s definitely possible to throw that switch, just not something that happens on a frequent basis in professional sports. Moe Mentum can be your bestest friend. He can also be a real asshole at times. He’s always around, though.

"I was not on the boat in question." -Darren Sharper

by coldpizza on Dec 17, 2009 10:23 AM CST up reply actions  

Bob Sanaders injury was a big reason the colts had a rollercoaster defense

Bringing families together through incorrect grammar and incoherent thoughts, don't mention it. It's what I do.

by asaint on Dec 17, 2009 11:30 AM CST up reply actions  

“Just look at what the Cardinals did last season.”

They lost the Super Bowl. Maybe they wouldn’t have, had they played better in December(?)

"I was not on the boat in question." -Darren Sharper

by coldpizza on Dec 17, 2009 10:19 AM CST up reply actions  

You want the defense to play with swagger? Swagger?!

What the hell do you call a Ray Lewis-esque stop on 4th and 2 – that was a bone-crushing, earth-shattering hit Vilma threw down on Snelling.

Our defense is clutch when it matters, and once we have speed in the secondary again with the return of Jabari Greer and Tracy Porter, our blitzing effictiveness will be doubled, thereby creating a beast of a pash-rush. It’s no coincidence that our sack production has dipped off with the disappearance of Greer and Porter. Their ability to play man coverage was the reason our blitz schemes worked.

Once the Saints are healthy they will once more be the most dangerous team in the league.

by J of the F on Dec 17, 2009 9:58 AM CST reply actions  

I think you are right. But unfortunately, until and unless we have a decade of dominance like the Patriots and Colts have had, everybody (including many Saints fans) will continue to say “you may be right, but I wanna see proof”.

by FriarBob on Dec 17, 2009 10:00 AM CST up reply actions  

I'm not so sure

Everyone remembers the ‘85 Bears. They don’t talk about the ‘84 or ’86 Bears, and they don’t denigrate the ’85 team as being a flash in the pan. They were awesome, maybe the greatest complete team ever. For one year. But boy, was it sweet.

If the Saints can go 19-0 this season, even if they never repeat as champions people who were alive to see it will savor—or gag on—what happened. They will always be remembered. That’s worth fighting for, giving your all for. Very, very few people ever have the chance to accomplish that. The ’07 Patriots did, and blew it. I think that recent example is going to help the Saints…and the Colts. One of them will make it.

Super Bowl 44: "If you play in this league and it's not your goal, there's something wrong with you." -- Marques Colston

by MtnExile on Dec 17, 2009 10:12 AM CST up reply actions  

Hello..........

What you are all worrying about is unfounded. Sean Payton is not blind to the fact that the defense is not up to par. I have to believe that he has a solution and is working it out. We did play some inferior teams close but we won and a win is a win. I will take a SuperBowl win just as close. The difference between then and now is our defensive backs that have not played. The whole team should be together thru the playoffs and that will make the difference.

by saint-sly on Dec 17, 2009 10:38 AM CST up reply actions  

Hell, FriarBob. I've already seen proof this season. Thirteen times, so far!

Fat, dumb, and happy. Hell, two out of three ain't bad!

I Want To Die In My Sleep Like My Grandpa – Not Screaming and Yelling Like His Passengers

If we're not suppose to eat animals, why are they made of meat?

by Just 'Nother Day on Dec 19, 2009 5:19 AM CST up reply actions  

Glass half empty...?

No…. it is half full. Get those starters back and never underestimate Greg Williams for one second

Ubi maior minor cessat

by bondcrash on Dec 17, 2009 10:06 AM CST reply actions   1 recs

+1

Our defensive problems come down to missing Greer and Porter. When it comes to cornerbacks, we are resting our starters. And when they come back, we will peak again…at the right time. In Miami.

Super Bowl 44: "If you play in this league and it's not your goal, there's something wrong with you." -- Marques Colston

by MtnExile on Dec 17, 2009 10:14 AM CST up reply actions   1 recs

Agree

I think the coaching staff is working in that direction. As much as I would like to see a 19-0 season, I would love to see the Saints win their very 1st February game!!!!!

"I said this early on, that this was a good football team, they just maybe had to have a stick put in certain parts of their body to play a little harder in certain places." - Saints defensive coordinator Gregg Williams.

by Ponysaints on Dec 17, 2009 12:35 PM CST up reply actions  

Half empty? Half full? Hell, my cup runneth over, y'all.

Fat, dumb, and happy. Hell, two out of three ain't bad!

I Want To Die In My Sleep Like My Grandpa – Not Screaming and Yelling Like His Passengers

If we're not suppose to eat animals, why are they made of meat?

by Just 'Nother Day on Dec 19, 2009 5:20 AM CST up reply actions  

I agree with everything you said. The silver lining that I see however, is the team’s inexplicable ability to “get up” for the big games, or rather, play light year’s above their heads against the better teams in the league. They’ve shown that on at least three occasions this season — versus the Eagles, Giants and Patriots — and arguably a fourth time against the Jets, though that victory wasn’t exactly in the bag thoughout, despite the final score.

On the whole, that’s better than simply playing up to the competition. That’s showing that they’re at least CAPABLE of running with the big dogs. Or, at the very least, what we all thought were the big dogs at the time. Even of that once fearsome foursome, only the Eagles look like a playoff lock. So, there’s absolutely some grey area there, in terms of just how good this team is and/or how far this “hot and lukewarm” roller coaster is going to take us.

The wonderful thing about the playoffs is, it’s a one-and-done show for the losers. If we beat the Vikings, they won’t be around to unravel beyond the defeat, so it will forever remain an impressive victory in the eyes of football fans everywhere. Because of our relatively weak schedule, THOSE are the kinds of victories we need, in order to gain respect. Let’s be honest, as big as the New England win was, it’s more about “what’s wrong with the Patriots?” in hindsight, not “what’s right with the Saints?” All that is about to change in about a month.

As far as the defense goes, there’s no doubt in my mind that injuries — particularly in the secondary — have taken their toll and are playing a key part in the decline in performance. You do have to keep in mind though, that even when we were playing so-called “dominant” D, we gave up a ridiculous amount of passing yardage to Kevin Kolb, so I really think it’s more about the turnovers that just aren’t coming as frequently lately, that are making it seem like we’ve taken a step back. In reality, we’re still the same mediocre, occasionally overachieving band of misfits we were on that side of the ball all along.

That’s not to say we haven’t improved over last season, when healthy. We didn’t have Sharper and Greer last season. We also didn’t have Porter for a lot of the time. And we didn’t have Gregg Williams preaching strip-and-score at all costs. While far from consistent, those factors have at least reared their pretty head here and there in ’09.

There’s obviously no telling what the future holds, even if we lock up home field advantage throughout. To assume that that guarantees squat beyond a 60 minute extension to this magical season is a bit naive imo, but I’m cool with the dreamers. If Rodgers or McNabb or Warner or Favre or whomever we wind up playing comes out flat, or gets rattled early by the crowd noise, or our suddenly resurrected, non-rusty M*A*S*H unit bursts back onto the scene with reckless, game-changing abandon … then it could be another big step in the right direction for the team as a whole. If it’s business as usual — and by “usual” I mean the kind of shoddy cross-all-your-fingers-and-toes play we’ve unfortunately become accustomed to over the last couple of months … well, then it might be Choke City to the Mark Cuban degree, come January. All we can really do as Saints fans is sit back, enjoy the ride and hope Clark Kent doesn’t forget to pack his cape.

"I was not on the boat in question." -Darren Sharper

by coldpizza on Dec 17, 2009 10:14 AM CST reply actions  

ha

I do feel better. Thanks Hollywoo!

Wanna say something? Sign up! It's free!

by Dave Cariello on Dec 17, 2009 10:59 AM CST up reply actions  

Once the starters are back, things will look better

You can’t blow out every opponent and the fact that we’ve won with a banged up defense says a lot about the character of this team. As long as there is time left on the clock, they feel they can win. They showed this in come from behind wins this season and this last game against Atlanta, where they held on to get the W. This isn’t the NCAA. Every pro team is capable of beating the best team out there. You cannot and should not take them lightly.

Is it a concern that Jason Campbell and Chris Redman had career days against the Saints? Yes. What concerns me more? Getting Porter, Greer and Fujita back in time for the playoffs and hoping they aren’t rusty. That is the big picture. Week 14 and Week 15 didn’t mean much for us except to lock up a playoff spot and a first round bye.

And the eighth and final rule: if this is your first time at Fight Club, you have to fight.

by Ace Venom on Dec 17, 2009 10:22 AM CST reply actions  

I think the worst team to ever win a World Championship

I have to think about the 2006 St. Louis Cardinals. They finished the regular season 83-78, which was good enough to win the NL Central that year. The hard rule of coming together at the end of the season did not apply to the Cardinals. In September, the Cardinals were 12-16. They lost their final game of the season on October 1 and their September included a seven game losing streak from September 20-September 26. Quite simply, the Cardinals played horrible baseball from September 1 to October 1, going 12-17 down that stretch. They finished just five games over .500, yet won the World Series.

How does this have any relevance to the NFL? It’s not about playing your best football in December. It’s about playing your best football in January and February.

And the eighth and final rule: if this is your first time at Fight Club, you have to fight.

by Ace Venom on Dec 17, 2009 10:38 AM CST reply actions  

i think we will be fine

guys we only have one more road game before the superbowl. and nobody can argue with the fact that we play completely lights out in the dome. even the idiots from other teams make me laugh with their superior “logic” about how we had two crappy wins compared their two losses. as far as going undefeated, maybe we should borrow a line from the team and just take it one game at a time. we’ll sort out the historical significance of the 2009 saints after the season is over.

"I was so excited because I thought I was going to be the hero,’’ Nicks said, smiling. "I knew exactly what I was going to do - I was going to jump from the 6-yard line like Reggie (Bush).’’

-Carl Nicks

by DrewBreesManCrush on Dec 17, 2009 10:49 AM CST reply actions  

If we lose one home game, and the Carolina game, and the Vikings keep it together, there could be another road game in late January. But there is no way we don’t play the NFC Championship in a dome…unless we lose a Divisional Championship at home.

"Think about that statement and all its implications for a second. The New England Patriots did not play up to the level of the New Orleans Saints." -Pat Yasinskas

by FuSoYa on Dec 17, 2009 10:53 AM CST up reply actions  

Or the roof of the Metrodome collapses, causing the game to be played at TFC Bank Stadium. That actually occurred in 1981, but they were able to patch it up in time. The Vikings vs Cowboys MNF game (in which Tony Dorsett scored a 99 yd TD) was temporarily rescheduled to be played in the Superdome that week, which would have been a neutral site. I can’t see the NFL outright handing a team home field advantage in the playoffs and there aren’t any non-inflatable domed stadiums in the Minneapolis area.

"I was not on the boat in question." -Darren Sharper

by coldpizza on Dec 17, 2009 11:21 AM CST up reply actions  

I suppose the Superdome roof could collapse, also. Too. Much. Positive. Energy. Must. Implode.

"I was not on the boat in question." -Darren Sharper

by coldpizza on Dec 17, 2009 11:24 AM CST up reply actions  

jock full of swagger
But what’s even more important this weekend is seeing them play with a defense chock full of swagger, proving they can turn it on when they need and that they will be ready to make that all-important playoff run. Even if they somehow lose. Soon, they won’t have that luxury.

Boom rec’d it. But don’t be a Nervous Nellie. Everything’s going to be fine.

This time, it's different.

by stujo4 on Dec 17, 2009 11:27 AM CST reply actions  

Craziness

Guys it’s our injuries. Jabari Greer gave up only one TD all season and it wasn’t even his fault. He was in great coverage on Roddy white. Tracy porter was blossoming and was playing very well for us. Scott fujita is one of the smartest players on the team and was always in the right place at the right time mike mckenzie is slow and Malcolm Jenkins us a rookie so I think we will be just fine.

by saintfever09 on Dec 17, 2009 11:55 AM CST via mobile reply actions  

You know what I don't get about the people who claim it's the injuries causing the defenses downturn?

What about the Patriots game? They didn’t have Greer or Porter, yet still looked amazing. A good playoff team needs to be deep and play well, EVEN WHEN THEY DON’T HAVE THEIR STARTERS.

Wanna say something? Sign up! It's free!

by Dave Cariello on Dec 17, 2009 11:58 AM CST reply actions  

The Patriots game was a peak

…but that doesn’t mean the Redskins and Falcons games were valleys. They were just our present defense playing its average game. Good enough to win against sub-par teams playing the best games of their seasons.

Actually, what worries me more than the defense is the offense. I thought, when the game was 23-9 (and later, when it was 23-16), that it was essentially over. The Saints would just continue to score, and the Falcons would be lucky to stop us south of 40. But it didn’t happen. It doesn’t bother me that we allowed the Falcons to score 14 points in the second half; it bothers me that we only scored 10. Owning the second half is really what got us here; and losing that second-half dominance is more worrisome to me than a leaky defense. We should be able to out-gun anybody.

Super Bowl 44: "If you play in this league and it's not your goal, there's something wrong with you." -- Marques Colston

by MtnExile on Dec 17, 2009 12:13 PM CST up reply actions  

Especially after that Vilma pick, with 3 minutes left in the game.

It is inexcusable that the Falcons were able to get the ball back before the 2 minute warning, which they did.

Run the damn ball Payton!!

His playcalling in the last 4 minutes of games is what worries me the most.

"They're ready to be like 'Same Old Saints'" - Roman Harper, on each of the New Orleans Saints vanquished foes of 2009

by Hollywoo! on Dec 17, 2009 1:05 PM CST up reply actions  

I don't care if we run the ball

…I care if we score. If we’d put the ball in the end zone, the score is 30-23. I realize that’s what the fake field goal was all about…but it shouldn’t have come to that. We’re the Saints, damn it! We don’t need permission to score!

Super Bowl 44: "If you play in this league and it's not your goal, there's something wrong with you." -- Marques Colston

by MtnExile on Dec 17, 2009 1:14 PM CST up reply actions  

Pardon me…33-23. Even better. Game over, in fact.

Super Bowl 44: "If you play in this league and it's not your goal, there's something wrong with you." -- Marques Colston

by MtnExile on Dec 17, 2009 1:30 PM CST up reply actions  

I care about both and there’s no reason that they can’t co-exist.

"I was not on the boat in question." -Darren Sharper

by coldpizza on Dec 17, 2009 1:33 PM CST up reply actions  

I agree. They actually did the same thing prior to the half. Came out of the two minute warning throwing in the red zone, thereby allowing the Falcons enough time to drive it back down the field the other way. Their clock management MUST improve on offense.

"I was not on the boat in question." -Darren Sharper

by coldpizza on Dec 17, 2009 1:22 PM CST up reply actions  

Payton's playcalling?

Here we go again. Classic MMQB second guessing Payton’s play calling. He’s the head coach AND play caller of the league’s #1 offense and potentially record setting offense. And you’re going to question the guy’s play calling?

Check the standings…13-0.

by mainesaint on Dec 17, 2009 2:13 PM CST up reply actions  

The Dolphins finished the ’72 season undefeated. Does that mean we should lobby for Garrett Hartley to fumble a botched snap in the Super Bowl? Hey, it worked out fine for Garo Yepremian.

"I was not on the boat in question." -Darren Sharper

by coldpizza on Dec 17, 2009 2:28 PM CST up reply actions  

People forget

that the ’72 Dolphins had to play the AFC Championship game in Pittsburgh ( that was before the home field advantage rule ). And were it not for the “Immaculate Reception” by Franco Harris, they would have had to go to Oakland and play a team that many still feel matched up better and probably would have beaten the Dolphins. So they had a little luck on their side too.

by WhoDat_OH on Dec 17, 2009 3:42 PM CST via mobile up reply actions  

Yep, they used to rotate home field between the divisions, if I’m not mistaken. Same way they do to determine the “home team” in the Super Bowl now.

"I was not on the boat in question." -Darren Sharper

by coldpizza on Dec 17, 2009 11:14 PM CST up reply actions  

Talk about "Here we go Again"

My bad. @#$% Rainbow’s and Unicorn’s and all that @#$%…

"They're ready to be like 'Same Old Saints'" - Roman Harper, on each of the New Orleans Saints vanquished foes of 2009

by Hollywoo! on Dec 17, 2009 3:17 PM CST up reply actions  

I can't help but think...

    the Pats game was a fluke with the current defense. I mean really…how many times did Brady completely miss wide open receivers in that game? I’m not saying the Pats would have won, but I think the final score would have been closer to what it was against the Falcons and the Redskins. For some reason, Redman and Campbell were able to complete those wide open looks that Brady missed.
   Our defense did give up some big plays at the biggining of the year, but the key is they didn’t give up big plays for touchdowns. That’s the difference between our defense now and at the start of the season. Teams were able to rack up the yardage, but we kept them from scoring.

by jack_casse on Dec 17, 2009 12:54 PM CST up reply actions  

Actually

In September and October, our opponents averaged 21 points per game, with a high of 34. In November and December, they averaged…21, with a high of 30.

It’s our scoring offense that has lagged, not our scoring defense.

Super Bowl 44: "If you play in this league and it's not your goal, there's something wrong with you." -- Marques Colston

by MtnExile on Dec 17, 2009 1:05 PM CST up reply actions  

That's also

the last game in which our pass rush was effective. Our inability to get to Redman and Campbell made them look as good as they did. When we’re on 3rd string DB’s the completely healthy D-line has got to pull some extra weight, or at least do their jobs with some kind of consistency.

"Think about that statement and all its implications for a second. The New England Patriots did not play up to the level of the New Orleans Saints." -Pat Yasinskas

by FuSoYa on Dec 17, 2009 1:40 PM CST up reply actions  

Yeah that’s what I don’t get. I gave our D-Line a pass for playing in a backyard mud hole against the Skins, but why couldn’t they generate some pressure in the Georgia Dome? Unless we’re still scared of the place or something.

by FriarBob on Dec 17, 2009 2:18 PM CST up reply actions  

We HAVE NOT PEAKED YET!

Think about it! Each new opponent has had the opportunity to pick apart every game we’ve played this season. All of our opponents’ game plans have challenged our weaknesses and every game we’ve been able to plug the holes and come out on top! The close games, as I see it, were because the coaches executed better judgement. Keep in mind that we’ve won every game we’ve played! I don’t think we’ve peaked yet.

Hell, as long as we peak in Miami is February I’ll be happier (than I am already!)

"How's your Mama and them?"

by whodatblackandgold on Dec 17, 2009 12:59 PM CST reply actions  

RELAX

Ya’ll know that it wouldn’t be Saintly for the diehard fans not to double up on their heart medication while watching a game. Hell I can’t ever rember seeing a game except through my closed fjngers.

OldFartFan

by OldFartFan on Dec 17, 2009 12:59 PM CST reply actions  

"ALL IS WELL!"

God, I love that movie.

"I was not on the boat in question." -Darren Sharper

by coldpizza on Dec 17, 2009 1:29 PM CST reply actions  

The only significant difference

between this December ‘09 Saints team and the team of the past 2 years(and in a broader sense, past 4 decades) to me is that I find myself trusting this Saints team to identify and at least somewhat rectify the problems they’ve run into. The defense hasn’t looked all that much worse(but definitely worse) than the first 11 games of the season, but they haven’t made the brilliant halftime adjustments I’ve grown accustomed to this fall in the last two outings. I really think that’s because of a combination of little things that equal one big slump for the defense. Two back-to-back road games, a constantly rotating defensive back crew, having to sub in linebackers on the fly. Chuckie(the failed blitz, the rotund DE, you pick). Basically, not enough time and reps as a unit to look cohesive. I think they’ll get back to their high-teens-ranked-couple-turnover selves. The offense looked pretty unsure in the second half against Atlanta, but seeing as a 26 point game in their rival’s house is the second worst job they’ve done all year, I’ll trust they will calm back down. The key part is, I trust these Saints to step up. I’m afraid of that feeling, or at least of how much I love it.

That said, I reserve the right to bitch about any and all boneheaded mistakes or decisions to pass three times when you’re closing in on the two minute warning with a three point lead that I see fit to, and I’ll continue to be a “real” fan while I do it.

"Think about that statement and all its implications for a second. The New England Patriots did not play up to the level of the New Orleans Saints." -Pat Yasinskas

by FuSoYa on Dec 17, 2009 2:00 PM CST reply actions  

It is your right...

…to second guess Payton’s play calling, but that doesn’t mean you are in the right. Payton didn’t get to where he’s at today by making what you would refer to as boneheaded mistakes. he plays his game. His game scores 36 per and ranks #1 and does it over 60 minutes week in and week out. Boneheaded? Um yeah…

With regards to the “D” it would seem your assessment of them being in a mini slump is spot on. The offense kind of went through one as well when they were turning the ball over 4 and 5 times a game. It’s to be expected in a 16 game season. I’d rather them get all of this out of their system now, and dial it up in January. I trust that they will because they’ve done nothing through 13 games to prove otherwise. It’s the complete body of work that will tell this story…not 2 games worth.

by mainesaint on Dec 17, 2009 2:21 PM CST up reply actions  

Of course they have more to prove.

The Superbowl is still a few games away. We either win it or we don’t. And if we don’t, wee didn’t prove anything.

But hey, it was fantastic to see the pats get demoralized.

by xen-cuts on Dec 17, 2009 2:01 PM CST reply actions  

jumping at shadows...

I hope the “their” in “above their head” meant the opposition. I am deeply offended otherwise.

WHODAT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

19-0

by nofear on Dec 17, 2009 2:20 PM CST reply actions  

Its an interesting debate...

…are the Saints the team that always gets it done OR are they awaiting a high caliber/on-fire playoff team to come in and run up 45 points on a defense that has looked VERY porous at times this season? Is this a temporary situation what will get fixed when the defensive starters return?

 Its really hard to say when you see the Rams,Skins and depleted Falcons run up more points on us than the Patriots did.

I am encouraged by the fact that we went through a bad turnover phase that started after the Giants game and the problem seems to have been corrected. Hopefully the boys are hard at work putting caulk in the holes…only time will tell.

Outside a dog, a book is a mans best friend. Inside a dog its too dark to read. -Groucho Marx

by themarsist on Dec 17, 2009 2:26 PM CST reply actions  

I've never trusted truisms because I usually find that, if you really look close,

they tend to be about as accurate as the fortune tellers down around Jackson Square. They just throw so much ‘data’ at you that, for things in the past, you catch the ones that fit and, for the future, you catch the ones that align with the way things are going. The rest are thrown in the trash.

So, with that being said, I think you want a team peaking around Feb 7.

WHODAT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

19-0

by nofear on Dec 17, 2009 2:32 PM CST reply actions  

Something to remember...

…this Saints team seems to play up/down the competition…just you watch them rise up to the occasion to show – yet again – to the world that they are legit!

And again….this is not the BCS…you have to win…be it by 3 or by 21 points…

Gonna be a good game, but Saints prevail, I’d say by 10 points!

by JREM on Dec 17, 2009 2:37 PM CST reply actions  

Cowboys on a fact finding mission...

They tried out Chris McAlister and Herb Donaldson today….

Ubi maior minor cessat

by bondcrash on Dec 17, 2009 4:10 PM CST reply actions  

Herb Donaldson?

What’s wrong with Pierre Thomas / Mike Bell / Reggie Bush / Lynell Hamilton? I mean, I like Donaldson and all, but does he play corner?

Super Bowl 44: "If you play in this league and it's not your goal, there's something wrong with you." -- Marques Colston

by MtnExile on Dec 17, 2009 4:40 PM CST up reply actions  

Eek

Cowboys trying them out. My bad. Yeah, they’re just trying to get advance intelligence.

Super Bowl 44: "If you play in this league and it's not your goal, there's something wrong with you." -- Marques Colston

by MtnExile on Dec 17, 2009 4:40 PM CST up reply actions  

Saturday night

   Cowboys will go down big, somehow that will be the national story, not what Saints do to them, Saints have the mo back and neither Bucs nor Panthers will take it away. The Eagles know they must come to New Orleans and are already talking smack. You wanted respect? You got respect. And more on the way.

by PanheadCatahoula on Dec 17, 2009 4:24 PM CST reply actions  

learning mode

Kinda interesting that our rookie secondary were in, I’ll call it, learning mode with a very weak offense in the Redskins. Refined it a little more last week. Now, with the number 3 defense (yards), our defense should be smokin’. I’m telling you, we’re so blessed this yeaR! Of course, we also have the 12th player in the stands, this week, to help out with a lot of screaming. If you can’t hear in the huddle and you can’t hear at the line of scrimmage. What are they going to do? Use sign language?

WHODAT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

19-0

by nofear on Dec 17, 2009 9:26 PM CST reply actions  

good point about there being offense and defense breakdowns lately

too many FGs when drives stalled in red zone vs. Redskins

and not enough 2nd-half steamrolling vs. Falcs

D needs to force more punts or TOs, and then Brees & Co. need to turn them into TDs (like we were doing so well early on)

"In the end, the bread was in the pudding." -- Bobby McCray

Shop as usual, and avoid panic buying.

by HansDat on Dec 17, 2009 9:35 PM CST reply actions  

Omigod! I am so worried

Colts are behind in the 4th!!!

zzzzzzzzzzzzzz what happened? Omigod! there only up by 4!!!!!

zzzzzzzzzz what happened?!??!?!? Oh, they won!

You could replace “Colts” with “Saints”. Get used to it.

WHODAT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

19-0

by nofear on Dec 17, 2009 10:11 PM CST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

The ultimate community for lovers of all things Black and Gold! The latest news, commentary, discussion, linkage and more! Join in the conversation now with all of your fellow Who Dats!

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

1311373128_guildwars2commando_697440_small
CSC Lagniappe: #13 Alltime Saints

Recent FanPosts

Small
Saints showing disrespect towards Drew Brees
Images_small
Hosting the Super Bowl
Small
Understanding our broken psyche (or "Why does it still hurt?")
Small
12 men on the field strategy?
Evil_bunny_small
Statistical Breakdown of WR Usage
271015_10150225174105754_682505753_7748609_5242564_n_1__small
My thoughts on the offseason
Angry_birds_small
About Robert Meachem
Parental_small
Expendable?
1311373128_guildwars2commando_697440_small
More draft options 2nd round or later...

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Featured Poll

Poll
Which Saints regular season was better: 2009 or 2011?
2009
402 votes
2011
446 votes

848 votes | Poll has closed

Twitter-logo_medium


Head Coach

Erindavewhodat_small Dave Cariello

Assistant Coach (Editor/Contributor)

0113wbphillips_small HansDat

Saintslogo_small Andrew Juge

Offensive Coordinators (Contributors)

13088_f520_small David "Satch" Kelly

L_f46d02fdda5fad668929c4424cb0d2dc_small Preston J. Gary, Jr.