Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Leandro Damiao Is Still Really Good

To Rest, or Not to Rest: Part Deux

You should remember that earlier this month I asked all of you whether or not you thought the Saints should rest key starters before heading into the playoffs, if given the opportunity. That was then, when perfection was still a possibility.

This is now...and the Saints have lost their last two games. With the Bears win last night over the Vikings however, the Saints have clinched the top seed in the NFC and now have that opportunity of taking their foot off the accelerator. But should they?

Going balls to the wall, putting together sixty minutes of solid football with their starters and making sure they win convincingly is just what this team - and the fans - need right now as they head into the playoffs. The Saints have been in decline for quite some time and now, more than ever, need to get back on track. A streaking Panthers team sans Steve Smith could be just what the doctor ordered. Isn't rest what the Saints earned with the bye week anyway?

Doing so runs the risk of injury, however. Sean Payton most certainly does not want to be responsible for the loss of a key starter just before the most important game(s) of his career. It's also an opportune moment to let everyone just relax and get back to full strength, completely recharged to make that final push. Finally, it's a good move because it prevents the worst case scenario for the Saints: Legitimately losing their third straight game with no excuses. 

Of course there is the possibility they do both. The starters may take the field for the first half of play and ride the pine later in the game. It may even become a game time decision based on how things are progressing. Going this route may keep the team fresh but doesn't guarantee anything in the way of a confidence booster.  

So... I ask you once again...to rest or not to rest? What do you hope to see Sean Payton do on Sunday?

Poll
Should the Saints rest their starters this Sunday against Carolina?
Yes
197 votes
No
190 votes
Part of the time
318 votes

705 votes | Poll has closed

Comment 83 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

If the Saints had ALL their starters AND other important players for Sundays game

AND they could play without getting a new injury or reinjuring a mostly healed injury, then maybe it would make sense to play everyone Sunday, but that’s not likely and it is risky.

Additionally, if all starters play and we lose because either Carolina is really on a roll or Carolina handles the weather better than we do (we haven’t had a bad weather game all year) , it doesn’t help our teams fragile psyche.

The only chance we have is to rest up and prep up, make some adjustments. We only have to win 2 home games to go to the Super Bowl. And, we may face 2 beat up teams and we will have much more time to prep and be prepared with a good game plan than them. A key injury or two to oppoents (such as Eagles center or Carolina’s Steve Smith) can really help us out tremendously and while you don’t really want to hope for that, the reality is that starting with last Sunday, Phila, Dallas, Ariz, Green Bay and Minnesota- all except one are really having like 3-4 playoff intensity games before they even get to our round. They are fighting for high stakes even before the playoffs start, it could take its toll.

"I think we agree, the past is over" - George W Bush
"The greatest enemy of knowlege is not ignorance; it is the illusion of knowledge" Stephen Hawking

by Philinwood on Dec 29, 2009 6:28 AM CST reply actions  

Any & all starter’s who are coming off of injuries or are injurered… (DO NOT PLAY THEM)!!!
As far as our healthy starter’s… (PLAY THEM)… Only the 1st half though!!!
I think it would be STUPID & a huge MISTAKE to sit our starter’s for the whole game!!!
We have to get back on track before the post season & we NEED that 1st half to do so… YES, it’s TRUE that u put ur starter’s at risk by play’n them… Weither it be the whole, half, quarter, series or even just (1) play of the game, a player CAN get hurt. It only takes (1) play for sumthing to happen, but we are in a situation were we HAVE to play some. (WE HAVE TO), bottom line!!!
After our game @ CAR, we will have 2 full week’s to prepare, rest & get 100% healthy… We MUST take advantage of the time we have, but at the same time, we CAN’T just sit back & assume or thinm=k that everything will work-out & that we will be just fine & WIN!!!
We MUST stay focused, study tapes non-stop, prepare like never before & UNIT as a team, like we did the 1st half of the season. If we DON’T, we WILL (LOSE) & that’s~that!!!

by RealDeal37 on Dec 29, 2009 8:36 AM CST up reply actions  

(What's)

with ALL the (parentheses)?

BURN THE BLACK PANTS!!!

by MtnExile on Dec 29, 2009 9:40 AM CST up reply actions  

I would'nt mind a little R&R

For ooh, I don’t know. Say maybe………HALF THE TEAM.

by KilnBill on Dec 29, 2009 6:55 AM CST reply actions  

Rest them

I saw what I needed to see in the first quarter of the Bucs game. I saw that we are still the team that we once were and we can be. I know that the rest of the game was played like crap, but I think that was kinda the plan. I don’t know for sure, but based on the playcalling for the offense, I hope that was what the plan was. If if wasn’t then I don’t know, maybe we should play our hearts out to the extent no one else gets injured. Do you really want to be Sean Payton and have Drew Brees go down with a broken leg ala Theisman???

by Saintsfan75 on Dec 29, 2009 7:11 AM CST reply actions  

They should show up in Carolina with no one but Hartley and Charles Grant dressed.

"Drew Breeeeeeeees!" "Oh, yeah."

by Malsby on Dec 29, 2009 7:24 AM CST up reply actions  

Let Big Charles

reclaim his former glory as a tailback

Being a Saints fan will take years off your life

by MobileSaint on Dec 30, 2009 1:31 PM CST up reply actions  

I think it should be discussed by the entire team.

Coaches should call a team meeting after practice and everyone should talk it out. I would have no problem with resting the starters, as long as everyone was on board with it and understood the reasons behind it. As long as the team had a good mindset and understood that a loss to the Panthers truly meant nothing, then no problems. We don’t want to have any resentment simmering beneath the surface. Like Payton Manning toeing the line after their loss. He spoke all of the right phrases in the post game conference, but many sportswriters said that his body language revealed something totally different. Plus the fact that he never removed his helmet after being pulled spoke volumes. I don’t think he was a happy camper!

"The Saints made the right decision signing Drew Brees-not just in terms of his arm, but because of his heart and mind." - Marshall Faulk

by SaintsFanMD on Dec 29, 2009 7:12 AM CST reply actions  

Rest

Look, a chance to rest your players for an extra week going into the playoffs in which you have homefield advantage is too big to pass up here. Momentum is extremely overrated. The Saints clobbered the Bucs and Pats…so they should have been amazing against Washington right? Nope. Dallas lost two in a row and came to New Orleans against a 13-0 team. So, the Cowboys lost miserably, remember? Oh, wait…

Yeah. And this is actually two weeks of time between games, not one. So, treat this game like a preseason game and give yourselves the best chance to win in the playoffs. Also, giving the backups some time might not be bad idea. We’ll probably need some of them en route to the Super Bowl.

"Drew Breeeeeeeees!" "Oh, yeah."

by Malsby on Dec 29, 2009 7:21 AM CST reply actions  

So lets say we rest all the stters

Who plays QB if we put brunell back there and peppers has a career sack day against him he’s old and wont last the whole game
I think we should activate Chase Daniels i would like to see him in the game saturday which is meaningless
This is the perfect setting to find out if he can be a long time back up because Brunell will be gone after this year

by simone219 on Dec 29, 2009 7:28 AM CST reply actions  

"Peppers has a career sack day"

is a very good argument in favor of resting Brees or having him play minimally. Also a good argument for activating Daniels. Keep in mind Peppers will be a free agent and he has a lot to play for on a personal level….$$$$

by Drew-Dat on Dec 29, 2009 11:46 AM CST up reply actions  

Getting Peppers in a Saints uniform. Now, wouldn't THAT be somethin'!

Just dreaming.

Fat, dumb, and happy. Hell, two out of three ain't bad!

I Want To Die In My Sleep Like My Grandpa – Not Screaming and Yelling Like His Passengers.

by Just 'Nother Day on Dec 29, 2009 9:49 PM CST up reply actions  

keep the routine

I think we should practice as normal this week and line up and play as well, but after a quarter or so, bring in Brunell, etc. Also, anyone who is slightly banged up can rest

That being said, I expect Brees to be in street clothes.

by SaintBevo on Dec 29, 2009 7:32 AM CST reply actions  

I think the starters will at least play for a quarter or so unless they’re already injured. Expect vanilla offense and defense though no matter who’s in there. No sense in showing our best game to people in a game that’s meaningless.

People with high-blood pressure should consult their doctor and ask if they're healthy enough for Saints activity before rooting for this team.

by Malsby on Dec 29, 2009 7:57 AM CST up reply actions  

Agreed

I say treat this game like a pre-season game, play the starters for a series or two then get the backups in.

by BayouRebel on Dec 29, 2009 8:05 AM CST up reply actions  

Brees will “start” to keep his streak alive if nothing else. Manning will do the same as well this weekend. But after the first snap, they can be sat without affecting their consecutive games streak. And I suspect they will be.

by FriarBob on Dec 29, 2009 11:03 AM CST up reply actions  

I no longer know what I think about this.

A lot of our key players are going to be in the game no matter what. We can’t afford additional injuries.

I guess I think that if anyone is injured at all then they should not play. Otherwise we need to keep at it. I wish that our corners would play against Steve Smith because I think he’ll test them. I’d like to see Sharper sit and I might rest Big Sed. I’d use Hamilton at running back unless he has difficulty blocking. I’d keep Bush’s touches to a minimum as well as Bell’s. PT won’t play. If Shockey played I wouldn’t let him go more than a half. And I’d sit Colston, Dev and Meach for a significant amount of time. I’d be most inclined to rest Meach because he’s used to playing off the bench. Dev and Colston have been hot and cold this year so I"d give them some touches.

Essentially, this comes down to a player by player evaluation for me.

by xen-cuts on Dec 29, 2009 7:40 AM CST reply actions  

Smith broke his arm in the Giants game. Doubt he'll be playing.

The only thing worse than losing is not winning.

by Tigernut on Dec 29, 2009 3:08 PM CST up reply actions  

Which speaks volumes for the "don't risk injury" argument, doncha' think?

Fat, dumb, and happy. Hell, two out of three ain't bad!

I Want To Die In My Sleep Like My Grandpa – Not Screaming and Yelling Like His Passengers.

by Just 'Nother Day on Dec 29, 2009 9:50 PM CST up reply actions  

Indeedy it doody.

The only thing worse than losing is not winning.

by Tigernut on Dec 30, 2009 9:57 AM CST up reply actions  

SP should

SP should … rest our key guys with injuries of course; Greer, Shockey, Shanle, Moore and the others that are nursing injuries. We need Pierre Thomas to be 100% for the playoffs.

Having said this …
I still believe the majority of first string units should start the game and play the better part of the first half!!! It’s important going into a bye to work on what needs attention.

So play those who need to play and consider it an opportunity to practice …
but in a game situation.

Offensively …
I think little has changed and in fact I believe we may actually be in better shape than we were at the beginning of the season. The emergence of Meachem and the improvement in Reggie’s yards per carry are encouraging.

Drew is Drew!!!
He is consistent and automatic and as such he and the first string should see no more than a quarter or two of action.

What has been inconsistent as of late …
it the offensive fronts inability to protect the pass rush. Against Dallas and a handful of others, Brees just didn’t have the time needed to make plays. Some improvement is needed here.

I have been encouraged by our secondary’s overall improvement since Porter’s return and am hopeful Greer will be on board soon as his coverage has been missed. These two guys in addition to Sharper and Vilma, put the "D" in the Saint’s Defense.

Speaking of something missed …
our teams ability to stop the run, worries me as we head into the second season …
the season that counts!!!!

I think that Sunday’s matchup against Carolina will be a good test even without DeAngelo Williams on the sidelines as Jonathon Stewart has been a load and was key to the Panther’s win this past Sunday.

So the starting D should see as much if not more game action come Sunday as our offense!!!

When Drew comes out …
and Brunell marches the Saints down field …
I’m hoping Hartley gets a chance knock some pigskin through the uprights as he certainly just needs more opportunities going forward!!!

After week 17, I’m hoping the bye gives our injured and the coaching staff ample time to heal, fix and tweak …
and that the Saints finish what they’ve started

by gunning4_7 on Dec 29, 2009 8:04 AM CST reply actions  

I say absolutely not

The Saints clinched home field advantage because the Vikings are collapsing worse than they are. What the Saints need to do is get on track before the playoffs and get a statement win against Carolina.

And the eighth and final rule: if this is your first time at Fight Club, you have to fight.

by Ace Venom on Dec 29, 2009 8:06 AM CST reply actions  

I had the same thought till

I started listening to the experts and they make sense
The problem is not the defense it is the same it has been all year
The problem is the offense and alot of that can be that they are not calling anything special just basic offensive plays to keep their game plan for the playoffs to themselves
And I gotta believe Sean Payton will straighten out the offense come playoff time

by simone219 on Dec 29, 2009 8:09 AM CST up reply actions  

Hey, I just realized something. The bye week is going to give the Saints FANS a rest.

Just by reading some of the posts in the last couple of days, I think a lot of us need it! Should give some egos a chance to mend!

Fat, dumb, and happy. Hell, two out of three ain't bad!

I Want To Die In My Sleep Like My Grandpa – Not Screaming and Yelling Like His Passengers.

by Just 'Nother Day on Dec 29, 2009 8:31 AM CST reply actions  

You got that right.

These boys are wearing me thin! It’s the New Orleans Saints, alright.

"Think about that statement and all its implications for a second. The New England Patriots did not play up to the level of the New Orleans Saints." -Pat Yasinskas

by FuSoYa on Dec 29, 2009 8:33 AM CST up reply actions  

Yea

But what the hell am I gonna do with a week off?

by KilnBill on Dec 29, 2009 8:59 AM CST up reply actions  

Besides sit here

and talk about the Saints with ya’ll?

by KilnBill on Dec 29, 2009 9:00 AM CST up reply actions  

Watch other teams and decide which you want (or don’t want) to face the most?

Or watch the AFC and kibitz about who we might face in the big game?

by FriarBob on Dec 29, 2009 11:05 AM CST up reply actions  

If saintsational is kind enough to open another live game thread like he did for Vik/Bears game

we could still get our football fix without the danger of overdosing on hope!

saintsational, you copy this, buddy?

Fat, dumb, and happy. Hell, two out of three ain't bad!

I Want To Die In My Sleep Like My Grandpa – Not Screaming and Yelling Like His Passengers.

by Just 'Nother Day on Dec 29, 2009 9:53 PM CST up reply actions  

Now there's

another great idea you’ve come up with JND.

by KilnBill on Dec 30, 2009 9:41 AM CST up reply actions  

Rest

I’ve gone back and forth on this, but they’re obviously hurting, and could use the time off. They got more than a single week to recuperate, which could do the running backs, Shockey, the precious outside linebackers, and whoever else is playing through pain right now a chance to really get healthy. If the O-line could use the rest(they’re all on every injury list, so my guess is they could), I’d say, welcome to the NFL, Chase Daniel. And to paraphrase the great Grandmaster Wang, there is no momentum left to lose. There is absolutely nothing to play for next week now, thanks…to…the Bears…grrr…thank you Chicago. I think they should take a page from Caldwell’s book, and let those play that want to play, rest those that are not 100%, and take Drew out after a quarter, if that long. And no matter what, Lynell Hamilton and Kyle Eckel are the Saints’ rushing attack next week, behind the solid blocking of Jamar Nesbit and Zack Strief, or Digger Bujnoch, if they can find him. Let Goody rest, let Nicks rest, and if it’s possible, let Evans rest. Bushrod could use the practice, but I don’t know who would be left behind him if he got banged up, so maybe let Dinkins hold the LT position. I could care less if I ever see him in a Saints uniform again. The secondary should be McKenzie(in his triumphant last game as a Saint), Jenkins(in his triumphant last game as a cornerback), Prioleau, and Reis. Grant should play, as he really needs to keep his momentum alive(and he might really shine as a member of the second-string D). Rest Ellis. Let Smith play if he feels great(he could add to his career-year in sacks). LB’s should be Waters, Casillas, and Mitchell.
Everyone else should be at work, rehabbing and going through walk-thru’s every day from now until their playoff game, hopefully getting angry and hungry for some redemption.

"Think about that statement and all its implications for a second. The New England Patriots did not play up to the level of the New Orleans Saints." -Pat Yasinskas

by FuSoYa on Dec 29, 2009 8:32 AM CST reply actions  

I occurs to me though

Payton will probably play balls-out. He can’t help the size of his cojones relative to that of his brain. I just hope it doesn’t bite us in the ass, by way of another flat performance from starters, or a serious injury.

"Think about that statement and all its implications for a second. The New England Patriots did not play up to the level of the New Orleans Saints." -Pat Yasinskas

by FuSoYa on Dec 29, 2009 10:33 AM CST up reply actions  

I don't know if anybody has suggested this but

should the Saints consider taking a look at Matt Stover for the playoffs, having lost confidence in Hartley’s ability to kick game-winners?

by Save Your Boredom on Dec 29, 2009 8:56 AM CST reply actions  

No

The Saints have not lost confidence in Hartley. He’s awesome and he has Carney in his ear.

Peace, love and understanding.
Tell me, is there no place for them today?

by stujo4 on Dec 29, 2009 9:09 AM CST up reply actions  

Now Matt Stover....

I think you may be the only one who has any confidence in him.

Peace, love and understanding.
Tell me, is there no place for them today?

by stujo4 on Dec 29, 2009 9:10 AM CST up reply actions  

He was solid for the Colts.

9-for-11 on field goals and perfect on extra points. Both our guys missed extra points this year.

I don’t actually think they should do it, I was just pointing it out as a possibility. Plus I don’t think the Colts have actually cut him.

by Save Your Boredom on Dec 29, 2009 9:59 AM CST up reply actions  

I retract half the harshness on Matt Stover

He’s been a good kicker for years. A lot of years. HE’s 41 YEARS OLD!! That’s Carney-esque. You want to put him in a make or break playoff situation? No way, let the ADD kid do it.

Rotoworld.com:

Adam Vinatieri-K- Colts Dec. 28 – 11:14 am et
Adam Vinatieri (knee) returned to game action Sunday for the first time since mid-October. Matt Stover will likely be released before the start of the playoffs.

PayLoo have declined your advice, they’re sticking with the kid.

Peace, love and understanding.
Tell me, is there no place for them today?

by stujo4 on Dec 29, 2009 11:13 AM CST up reply actions  

Elam would be a better option than Stover, if they were to even consider going the over-40, non-Carney route.

"I was not on the boat in question." -Darren Sharper

by coldpizza on Dec 29, 2009 1:56 PM CST up reply actions  

I take that back, Elam won’t be 40 until March.

"I was not on the boat in question." -Darren Sharper

by coldpizza on Dec 29, 2009 1:57 PM CST up reply actions  

At least hartleys miss was long enough and close-

I have seen some real doosey’s this season, and Hartley is not in that all over the place catagory….

by '09 on Dec 29, 2009 10:26 AM CST up reply actions  

Carney was saying

“Miss it. Miss it… Yes!”

I kid.

by Save Your Boredom on Dec 29, 2009 9:56 AM CST up reply actions   1 recs

LOL!! Rec!

Fat, dumb, and happy. Hell, two out of three ain't bad!

I Want To Die In My Sleep Like My Grandpa – Not Screaming and Yelling Like His Passengers.

by Just 'Nother Day on Dec 29, 2009 9:55 PM CST up reply actions  

This game means nothing

If a player needs a couple of weeks to be at his best for the playoffs, then he should rest. But there are players that need to play to stay sharp. DB’s and TE’s and O-line needs to take a week off and get healthy. Eckel needs to play and get into the game plan, i.e. Help the LT block Drew’s blind side.

This is OUR year!! Yea, I said it. Who Dat!!!

by Big and Easy on Dec 29, 2009 9:34 AM CST reply actions  

Playing Well is Important

All Starters should play at least a half. If playing well, rest starters for second half. If not playing well, play entire game. If not playing well, does it matter if someone gets hurt? The Saints have to build some momentum (mojo, confidence, swagger, you pick) going into the play-offs.

by Ponysaints on Dec 29, 2009 9:38 AM CST reply actions  

rest until they get the lead and some confidence

then take them out once we have a huge lead, securing a 14-2 record and some happy fans/organization

by AKAY47 on Dec 29, 2009 9:48 AM CST reply actions  

you are working under the assumption they get the lead

what if they start the starters and get down 14-3 or something like that? Then how confident are you going to feel? You can’t assume playing the starters means they automatically win.

Wanna say something? Sign up! It's free!

by Dave Cariello on Dec 29, 2009 10:12 AM CST up reply actions  

No, but without Steve Smith we’ve got a better chance than we did before that point.

by FriarBob on Dec 29, 2009 11:14 AM CST up reply actions  

Steve Smith??

With our run defense of late, they don’t need to throw the ball to anyone.

by Ponysaints on Dec 29, 2009 1:22 PM CST up reply actions  

Perhaps. But increasing our odds from 5% to 7% is still a “better chance”. And I think both numbers are at least a bit low…

by FriarBob on Dec 29, 2009 4:33 PM CST up reply actions  

Playing or sitting starters is just another game plan. If you have a game plan, stick to it.

Sure, the Colts fans were up in arms over Indy throwing in the towel. But, they were still wanting the perfect season. For Saints Fans, or this one anyway, I still want the perfect team going into the playoffs. After the 1st quarter sit them . . . . . in the bus. . . . . at the freakin’ airport!!!

Fat, dumb, and happy. Hell, two out of three ain't bad!

I Want To Die In My Sleep Like My Grandpa – Not Screaming and Yelling Like His Passengers.

by Just 'Nother Day on Dec 29, 2009 10:02 PM CST up reply actions  

my thoughts

I think that all of our players need a rest. They are playing slow and worn down. But unfortunately we still have a lot to prove. Sounds funny saying that about a 13-2 team. They need momentum going into the playoffs and if they beat Carolina on the road then they should have it. I think our D needs to prove that they can stop the run consistently and the O needs to get back into stellar form. They should have all the opportunity in the world next Sunday to right the ship and regain confidence. And i hope they play the starters.

New Orleans Saints, "God's Team"

by D.P.M. on Dec 29, 2009 10:12 AM CST reply actions  

1 and Done

We should play the starter for the first quarter and part of the second and then sit em.

by Saintsfan4life on Dec 29, 2009 10:16 AM CST reply actions  

+1

Being a Saints fan will take years off your life

by MobileSaint on Dec 30, 2009 1:33 PM CST up reply actions  

Let Brunell see if the offensive line can stop Peppers

Then put in Brees for a quarter or two to keep him in tune, and let the defensive staters see if they can stop Carolina’s running game- We need to know if we can do it…..

by '09 on Dec 29, 2009 10:24 AM CST reply actions  

On a side note,

It would be interesting if the Cowboys had to play the Eagles two weeks in a row. Has that ever happened? Is it even possible?

"Think about that statement and all its implications for a second. The New England Patriots did not play up to the level of the New Orleans Saints." -Pat Yasinskas

by FuSoYa on Dec 29, 2009 10:35 AM CST reply actions  

Yup. It’s definitely possible. It could happen to as many as 8 teams this weekend, actually. Cards could turn around and face the Pack again (not terribly likely ATM but possible). Iggles/Boys. Bengals/Jets. And theoretically, even NE/Houston, although that’s VERY unlikely.

Not sure if it’s happened before tho.

by FriarBob on Dec 29, 2009 11:08 AM CST up reply actions  

yes it happened

we did it against the rams for our first ever playoff win. lost the first one, won the second.

"F***!"

-me

by DrewBreesManCrush on Dec 29, 2009 11:19 AM CST up reply actions  

Yep.

"I was not on the boat in question." -Darren Sharper

by coldpizza on Dec 29, 2009 1:58 PM CST up reply actions  

Can’t believe I forgot that one.

by FriarBob on Dec 29, 2009 4:34 PM CST up reply actions  

I think...

they should deactivate everyone and let the practice squad dress out for this game.

by jack_casse on Dec 29, 2009 11:17 AM CST reply actions  

If you rest some guys who need rest

and then you start the rest of the starters, now you have a team that is like 70 or 80 or 90 per cent as good as our “REAL” team. So that puts RBs, QBs, WRs at risk to get “jacked up” and injured, it puts LBs at risk to get beat up
because the DL is compromised and now LBs to shed more blockers than usual, ditto for safeties and CBs, and if the pass rush is compromised then DBs bet beat up on screen passes, draws, etc and have to play more downs and everybody loses more confidence. The worse your DL is, the more work by defensive seondary and this more risk. At least now, 1) offense knows they can still score re: 1st few drives vs. Tampa til they let up, defense knows they went 60 minutes only giving up 1 fg 1 td. If they get pushed around on Sunday because 3/4 of starters play, how will that help them??

"I think we agree, the past is over" - George W Bush
"The greatest enemy of knowlege is not ignorance; it is the illusion of knowledge" Stephen Hawking

by Philinwood on Dec 29, 2009 11:24 AM CST reply actions  

agreed

special teams needs some work, though

"Give them nothing! But take from them everything!"

-King Leonidas

by DrewBreesManCrush on Dec 29, 2009 11:26 AM CST up reply actions  

it might go something like this

who dat?
who dat?
who dat say dey gonna drink and drive?
Bobby McCray, dat’s who

"In the end, the bread was in the pudding." -- Bobby McCray

Shop as usual, and avoid panic buying.

by Hans Petersen on Dec 29, 2009 6:58 PM CST up reply actions  

Ultimately the ones that may beat the Saints, are the Saints themselves. Let’s hope they get it together when it counts.

by WhoDat_OH on Dec 29, 2009 12:51 PM CST via mobile up reply actions  

I have confidence that Payton knows what he's doing.

For most of this season, Sean Payton was lauded as an “offensive genius” by the “football experts”. I don’t think he suddenly became stupid after the Patriots game.

Since that brilliant game plan for the Patriots, our problems on offense have been more due to limited play calling than which players are on the field. The only way I could get behind playing the A team (or as much of the A team as possible) and going for a win would be to open up the play book and go back to what this team does best. BUT, as Payton didn’t do this against the Cowboys on a nationally televised game when an undefeated season was on the line, I think we all know he’s not going to do it against the Panthers on the last game of the season that means absolutely nothing.

Bottom line is Payton doesn’t want to lose this game, but he’d rather lose it than tip his hand to other playoff teams regarding what they can expect in the post season. Makes no sense to put key players at risk, particularly if they’re going to have one hand tied behind their back.

The good news is the Eagles, Cowboys, Vikings (and to a lesser extent, the Packers and Cardinals) all have something to really play for this week. What are the odds that 4 out of 6 playoff teams will be playing each other on the last game of the regular season? And, the fifth team (Vikings) are in a must win situation. No other team has the option we have as they will have to play this weekend as though it’s the first game of the playoffs. They will probably have to open up their play book and risk injury to key players. We don’t.

When we get to games that really matter, we will have a much better idea of what to expect from them than they will of us. I think that will benefit us much more in winning a Super Bowl than any " swagger " we might get from beating a team we’ve already beat.

by Drew-Dat on Dec 29, 2009 12:52 PM CST reply actions  

Play to win the game!

If they need rest for better health than rest. We need to get back our confidence as a team. It’s like putting points on the board before half time, when you’re down. Yeah people could get hurt, but hell people could get hurts what’s say driving home drunk @ 4:30 Hmmm……

by SaintJenkins on Dec 29, 2009 12:56 PM CST reply actions  

Just because you have a lack of confidence doesn't mean the team does

If Brees were to be injured, we might all be driving drunk at 4:30.

And remember, the injury that ultimately brought him to the Saints occurred during a meaningless last game of the season in San Diego. He also recently sustained an injury in a Pro Bowl game that exists for no other reason than for the NFL to make even more money. Ironically, injuries seem to occur more frequently in games that don’t matter more than in games that do. Don’t think it couldn’t happen.

by Drew-Dat on Dec 29, 2009 1:15 PM CST reply actions  

Why not just forfeit the game? They could use the jet fuel they save to start a New Year’s Eve bonfire. A huge “Burn the Black Pants” pep rally. It would also teach all the idiots who stage fantasy football championships on Week 17 a valuable lesson in ass-u-me-ing.

"I was not on the boat in question." -Darren Sharper

by coldpizza on Dec 29, 2009 2:08 PM CST reply actions  

Okay, here's the wife's take

And once She has spoken on the matter…well, the debate is over. Of course.

Play the starters. They don’t deserve a rest. Something is broken on both sides of the ball, and we have one game left to try and fix it before the playoffs. The practice field may be the place to make the repairs, but not to test them. We need real game experience to tune up for the playoffs. And if we play in earnest and get beat and it hurts the Saints’ confidence…awwwwww. Poow widdle boys.

(My wife is a hard woman. I mean, vicious…)

BURN THE BLACK PANTS!!!

by MtnExile on Dec 29, 2009 3:32 PM CST reply actions   1 recs

+1

The only thing worse than losing is not winning.

by Tigernut on Dec 29, 2009 3:42 PM CST up reply actions  

And if we play in earnest and get beat and it hurts the Saints’ confidence…awwwwww.

Yeah, awww for them and us. If that happens (and I’m willing to risk it, personally), I can go ahead and start cranking down my hopes and dreams and begin to mentally prepare myself for their sudden and inexplicable demise in the playoffs.

My wife is a hard woman. I mean, vicious…

Bet she’s great in bed, though huh? They say the sweetest kittens have the sharpest claws. =oD

The only thing worse than losing is not winning.

by Tigernut on Dec 29, 2009 3:47 PM CST up reply actions  

This team is worn out

Physically and mentally.
That is why we lost the last two games. It’s really that simple.
Playing the starters is not going to prove anything. We didn’t win 13 games in a row by accident. We’ve got the talent, coaching, etc. WHAT WE NEED IS REST.
There is a reason that the home teams in the NFL division games are the safest bet in sports: they all are teams that had a week off playing beat up wilcard winners. Look up the percentages.
This is a meaningless game. I’d activate the practice squad to play in Carolina. Don’t waste time game planning for this game, either. Use this week to rehab and start preparing for the playoffs. Don’t give the playoff teams anymore gametape of our strengths and weaknesses.
I think the loss to Tampa should be enough of a wake-up call. It should be much more motivating than “finishing strong” in Carolina and limping into the playoffs. Finishing strong would only make the fans feel better—and what if we lost?
We’re the number one seed. We won 13 games in a row. We’ve earned the right to rest up for the playoffs. And come playoff time when it counts, I’ll take our full-strength squad over any other squad in the NFL.

In Breesus' name we play

by Breesus Christ Superstar on Dec 29, 2009 6:28 PM CST reply actions  

I agree. We actually looked pretty flat for the majority of the Jets game earlier in the year. Despite the 14 point margin of victory, that game really could have gone either way. Until the loss to Dallas, the 24 pts scored in that game were our season low. The offense struggled, while the then-existent defense helped us secure a victory over what could very likely be a playoff team. That’s really not that much different than the Dallas game, other than the fact that we won. How much momentum did we lose during the bye week? None, whatsoever. In fact, we played one of our most complete games of the year the coming off of the bye, dismantling another playoff bubble team from NY. I fully understand that we’re flat and that we’re coming off two losses. The fact remains that both of the losses could have turned into 14 point victories with just a break or two, same as the Jets game. We’re not flatlining, we just not crushing our opponents. And let’s face it, even if we play up to our fullest potential, we’re not going to win three straight playoff games as convincingly as we beat the Stafford/Kolb/Edwards led Lions/Eagles/Bills to start the season. If you think we would, you’re pipe dreaming. The competition WILL be there to push us to the limit, just as it was against the Giants, Patriots and Cowboys. And while we’ve had mixed results in those those type situations, very little of that has to do with our preparedness. The Cowboys were just the better team that Saturday. What I’m saying is, by blowing off this game and getting a jump on preparing for WHOEVER — and you CAN begin to prepare for a game without knowing exactly who your oppoent will be — we’re really no worse off than we were coming off of the Jets near-loss. Arguably better off, because we’re a veritable M*A*S*H unit compared to then. And we’re afforded a second week off for that. If we crash and burn in the playoffs, it won’t be because we weren’t as physically or mentally prepared as we woulda, coulda, shoulda been. It won’t be because we lost an irreplaceable coughDrewBreescough player in Charlotte. It will be because we once again ran smack into a better team that particular week. One that could take it to us in the Superdome, just like Dallas did a couple of weeks back. If that happens, no amount of rah-rah carry over from two weeks prior would prevent it. Not when nine consecutive wins with zero weeks off couldn’t prevent that particular loss. Is one victory going to exceed nine victories, in terms of momentum? Hmm. Probably not. Throw on top of the whole mess the distinct possibility that we play all of our starters for 60 minutes and STILL get demoralized by the red hot Panthers — as was the case for both the Vikings and Giants these past two weeks — and you’ve got even a bigger public relations nightmare on your hands. If you think there are hints of self doubt floating around the locker room now, wait until the Ghost of the 2002 Collapse shows up, blowing his black & gold party favors. We don’t need that. Backups + blow it off = a built in excuse for losing. You can ask the Colts all about that. And they had more on the line (an undefeated season) than we do. Cowardly approach? Perhaps. Wise approach? Without question.

"I was not on the boat in question." -Darren Sharper

by coldpizza on Dec 30, 2009 1:33 AM CST up reply actions   1 recs

Well put

"Think about that statement and all its implications for a second. The New England Patriots did not play up to the level of the New Orleans Saints." -Pat Yasinskas

by FuSoYa on Dec 30, 2009 8:13 AM CST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

The ultimate community for lovers of all things Black and Gold! The latest news, commentary, discussion, linkage and more! Join in the conversation now with all of your fellow Who Dats!

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

1311373128_guildwars2commando_697440_small
CSC Lagniappe: #13 Alltime Saints

Recent FanPosts

014_small
Would you like to see the Saints sign Albert Haynesworth?
Colts-saints-2_small
Has anyone ever done the Punt, Pass and Kick competition
Small
Saints showing disrespect towards Drew Brees
Images_small
Hosting the Super Bowl
Small
Understanding our broken psyche (or "Why does it still hurt?")
Small
12 men on the field strategy?
Evil_bunny_small
Statistical Breakdown of WR Usage
271015_10150225174105754_682505753_7748609_5242564_n_1__small
My thoughts on the offseason
Angry_birds_small
About Robert Meachem

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Featured Poll

Poll
Which Saints regular season was better: 2009 or 2011?
2009
402 votes
2011
446 votes

848 votes | Poll has closed

Twitter-logo_medium


Head Coach

Erindavewhodat_small Dave Cariello

Assistant Coach (Editor/Contributor)

0113wbphillips_small Hans Petersen

Saintslogo_small Andrew Juge

Offensive Coordinators (Contributors)

13088_f520_small David "Satch" Kelly

Top_small Alex Swift

L_f46d02fdda5fad668929c4424cb0d2dc_small Preston J. Gary, Jr.

100media36imag0036_small Travis Dauro