With the 164th Pick in the 2009 NFL Draft the New Orleans Saints Select P Thomas Morstead
What the $*%^#!?!?! With only four picks in this years draft I think we had a feeling that the Saints would make some draft day moves to gain another pick or two. After trading with the Eagles to gain a pick in the fifth round of the draft the Saints used that pick to select...wait for it...a punter! The Saints have selected punter Thomas Morstead out of Southern Methodist.
This one is really out of left field. We now know that the Saints really wanted RB Chris Wells yesterday so when they announced that the Saints had made a trade to get into the fifth round, I thought for sure they would use that pick to grab Liberty running back Rashad Jennings who was still on the board. Alas, they decided to take it in a different direction and keep us all on our toes. If you thought drafting Taylor Mehlhaff was a bad idea, you probably aren't too happy about the Saints latest draft day decision.
Certainly this means the team does not have complete faith in current punter Glenn Pakulak. Still...a fifth round pick? The Saints were doing well up until now.
Here is your linkage:
Strengths:
Prototypical size...A pretty good athlete...Technically sound...Good hands...Outstanding leg strength...Great hang time...Gets excellent leverage...Never had an attempt blocked...Can kick field goals in a pinch...Could potentially kick off...Hard worker...Intelligent...Leader.
Weaknesses:
Didn't face a lot of pressure situations...Leg is so strong he'll out-kick his coverage at times...Has some work to do when it comes to kickoffs.
Notes:
Career average is the fourth best in school history...Connected on 37 of 53 field goal attempts (70%) and went 106 for 108 on extra points for the Mustangs...Named 2nd Team All-Conference USA in 2006 and 1st Team in 2007...Led Conference USA and ranked 9th in the nation with a 44.6-yard average as a junior...Very good prospect who played his entire college career in relative obscurity...Has the physical tools and superb intangibles to be drafted and earn a starting job in the NFL.
Year
GP
Punts
Yds
Avg
Lg
IN20
BLK
2004
RS
-
-
-
-
-
-
2005
DNP
-
-
-
-
-
-
2006
12
50
2,191
43.8
65
18
0
2007
12
57
2,545
44.6
72
21
0
2008
12
59
2,465
41.8
67
20
0
Totals
36
166
7,201
43.4
72
59
0
Positives: Tall, with an adequate build and long legs. ... Good extension on field goal attempts. ... Uses his height to bring in high snaps (may have issues with lower snaps). ... Has a quick two-step delivery as a punter (about 1.25 seconds) and kicks the ball at a low position, but still gets 4.7-4.8 seconds of hang-time on 40-yard punts. ... Adept placing the ball inside the 10-yard line. ... Has the size and speed to be an effective last line of defense covering punts. ... Improved his accuracy as a kicker in 2008, making 5-of-6 from 40-49 yards. Made 3-of-4 FGAs from 50-plus yards in 2007 and didn't attempt a kick from that distance in '08.
Negatives: Does not turn the ball over enough in his full-length punts. ... Has not been a kickoff specialist, but may be tried there due to his leg strength. ... Must prove himself as a holder if not used as a kicker. ... Missed three kicks inside of 40 yards in 2008, four in both 2006 and 2007.
31 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Is it too late to start cheering for ATL?
WTF?!?!?!?! NO MORE KICKERS! WTF is Payton’s obsession with kickers? NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO. Just say no.
Nah...
.. you go right ahead and cheer for Atlanta.
Don’t come knocking when the Saints are celebrating their Superbowl victory.
by Tigernut on Apr 26, 2009 6:02 PM CDT up reply actions
This guy doesn't even seem good
Every one of the kick in the video was from right to left. Can he even place the ball? We could have used another special teams player or something….SOMETHING…. Why blow the pick?
You must not have been paying attention… there was at least one LtR in there…
And he was never blocked in college. I dunno, that seems just slightly impressive there…
Oh and then of course theres the minor bit that hanging a punt in the air for 5 seconds means you’ve given your gunners (who all run low 4.x 40s) time to get down the field and catch up with your punt, which means run-backs are usually fairly minimal. I saw a LOT of fair catches in that clip…
Payton's explanation:
“He has a strong leg, we think the best leg in the draft,” Saints Coach Sean Payton said. “We think we’ve got a very good punter and the objective is to improve ourselves at that position. We think it’s going to be a very good competition with Glenn (Pukalak)”
Go Saints!!!! Deuce may be gone, but he will never be forgotten.
by David "Satch" Kelly on Apr 26, 2009 3:07 PM CDT reply actions
My analysis:
He makes a good Gatorade. We think he makes the best Gatorade in the draft and our objective is to improve ourselves at that position. I think he will compete for a position on our equipment squad.
Rouses has openings if it doesn’t work out.
this pick
would’ve been good if they hadn’t given up next year’s 5th rounder; it’s questionable that they did. i think it’s important to address the punting position—we were DEAD LAST in the NFL for punts inside the 20 yard line—by quite a bit. Sure, Pakulak had a pretty good average, but Payton thinks this guy has a good leg and he should be able to directionally kick a little better than Pakulak. Field position is the most overlooked aspect of the game in a lot of ways, but statistically one of the most important—so if this guy is as good as they think he is, then this is like a defensive choice.
But I hate that we gave up a pick next year—did they really think he’d be gone that soon? I’m sure they could’ve given up this year’s seventh and next year’s seventh for a late sixth rounder—and grabbed him then. Just doesn’t seem to have the value we’re looking for with only 4 picks in the draft…
Also all this talk about Rashad Jennings—it’s almost halfway through the 6th and no one’s taken him yet. It seems the pre-draft excitement for him was unfounded and the product of EVIL BLOGGERS. regardless, i think our RB situation is OK and if we need extra there are veteran free agents still available (let’s get that “resign deuce!” chant going) and other undrafted FAs to be had.
When we made the pick on ESPN
My initial reaction was “WTF – WE TRADED UP FOR A F-ING PUNTER??” However, the announcers on ESPN did not seem particularly suprised or shocked. It seems that this was just about where this guy was projected to go (I guess another punter had already gone). Now, we can debate the wisdom of picking a punter – I personally don’t like it and gave the pick a 3 – but it doesn’t seem to be an act of total stupidity like, say taking a S in the early second round that graded out as a free agent.
Yeah, another had. To, unsurprisingly enough, another team that also needed a punter because their punting game was also horrid last year… the Bengals. Both the Saints and the Bengals had horrid punting last year. These are areas that badly need to be improved for both teams.
I have to admit I loved the NFL network clip (on nfl.com) when Huber was picked. “Punters are People Too”. Those clowns were quite funny there. And of course that then led to the second scene I loved, which I hope makes it into a clip somewhere, because Mr. Irrelevant was a K and they went through their routine again for that.
Well thats it your 2009 Draft class
OK well it appears we also traded the Seventh round pick with Punter. I thought we still had our 7th round pick. But we do not. So Thats it the Draft for the Saints is over and these are our 4 picks for this year.
Sorry, I dont think the punter was a good idea. with loosing the 7th round of this year too.
Ok well people complain that the 7th round is not much of anything. Just look at Arrington and Colston.
I am happy with the other 3 pics, but I hope this guy can put the ball every time inside the 10 yard line.
They may have overpaid...
But they did NOT waste the pick. Remember that we went through THREE punters last year. Pakulak was the third and they had several others come through for tryouts, that’s how outright horrible we were at punting last year. And trust me, field position matters. The Giants wouldn’t have won their superbowl without their ability to pin the cheatriots and other opponents deep. San Diego should NOT have even had half a chance to take out Indy, but their punter made life VERY hard on Peyton and company and aside from bad reffing I think he pretty much single-handedly won that game for them.
I doubt he’ll be that good this year. But if he’s even halfway between Pakulak and those other two he’ll be a HUGE upgrade and we need that. Even the #1 offense in the league doesn’t score on every possession. (Well, they haven’t yet at least… I wouldn’t mind if they did this year… )
But using a DRAFT pick?
I don’t disagree with you, padre. But, I mean, …. come ON! Are you telling me there wasn’t a decent, diamond-in-the-rough QB out there we could have groomed to be Drew’s successor? Or are you content with depending on crusty old Brunell and whoever is left in the bottom-of-the-bin rotation to back him up?
by Tigernut on Apr 26, 2009 5:51 PM CDT up reply actions
Well
Looks like the Colts used our 7th Round pick on a kicker, so I guess that everything involving our 7th Round Pick alone has an eerie specialist vibe to it.
I'm Sorry, Punter
Weird draft this year, huh? So many punters going hot off the boards…
Hahah...
… Yeah, but ya know we have to make at least one each season.
It’s tradition!
by Tigernut on Apr 26, 2009 5:45 PM CDT up reply actions
Just when...
I was about to announce this as one of the smartest Saints drafts ever.
Yeah, I know the kicking game is important, but using a draft pick? That is insane when there are plenty of good soccer and rugby players out there who can kick the crap out of the ball and would love to walk-on to an NFL team or even if not that, a lot of good NCAA punters not drafted who would do the same.
Not only that, but when you draft a punter, you’re basically telling your offense that you have little faith in their ability.
by Tigernut on Apr 26, 2009 5:42 PM CDT reply actions
Just let me add this.....
I don’t agree with the pick. But my best friend of 23 years/roomate (current) played kicker/punter for Grambling State last year and he’s really good, he got looks in last year’s draft. While he was on his camp trail trying to show his talent, he met a dude that he said is the most amazing punter he’s ever met…..his name was Thomas Morestead. I hope this adds a little sunshine to you guy’s gloom about the pick
Rog Smoove
Why so amazing???
Can we get the punter on the horn for an interview with Dave. There’s our source… a guy we know, has a friend, who is his roommate, that is a punter, that knows Thomas Morestead. Or at least seen him kick it a few times.
Seriously, was there anything in particular that he said about him that stood out to you, or him rather.
looking forward to 2010
by asaint on Apr 26, 2009 8:56 PM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
He said that he has the strongest leg he's ever seen
and dude I’m not 1 to be a douche, but please don’t try to make me look like a fool. Last time I checked, you don’t know me and I don’t know you, so chill…but since I’m a nice guy I’ll answer your question. My roommate (who I LIVE with and TALK to everyday) is a legit K/P that knows what he’s doing. So let me ask you a question…If you are a legit actor or whatever, wouldn’t you be able to recognize talent when someone has the same craft as you?? But I’m not defending TM, I’m just giving you some insider information to ease your mind
Rog Smoove
My bad...Not trying to be a douche
I was being serious about the interview. Then I was joking about the source because of the recent Jeff Duncan interview series. And I was seriously intrested about what stood out to him.
looking forward to 2010
NOt BAd
How many games did we lose from a 3 point margin…..NE one Ne one? Like FIVE! maybe 6 if you count Dramatica making those early game F/Gs. the one truly effective position when u cant score a TD in the red zone Payton hasnt figured out how to find a MOrten Andersen i.e “Obsession”
Maybe their's a gen-gap here...
First, if Morestead is reading this, I want to say, welcome to the Saints, my man. I hope you’re not getting the idea that we don’t like you or doubt your ability because we didn’t agree with the team picking you. And to tell you the truth, I have to defer to our coaches: they gave up a pick for you, so you must be something truly special and I can’t wait to see you play. However….
Used to be, the Saints needed a great punter because our offense sucked. I was often heard saying that New Orleans was a great place for a punter to make a name for himself. Maybe these old guys here can’t forget those days and still think that we need a great punter to even have a chance at a winning season.
Old guys, you should now see that we have the best offense in the league and it’s only getting better. I just feel that if you have a mediocre offense, then yeah, you need a great punter. If you have a great offense, a mediocre punter should do. And I am frankly worried that Drew has a target on his back after last year and I’d feel a whole lot better if there were a backup on the team I could have some confidence in.
As for you, padre…. sorry, I was thinking Hartley when I wrote Melhaff, though thanks for letting me know he’s gone and now the pick makes more sense. And as for this statement of yours:
“As for "no faith in their ability", say WHAT? Does that mean when you get to the 20 yard line and it’s 4th and 8 that you don’t send out your PK because you don’t want your offense to be afraid you’re losing faith in them?”
My answer: Depending on the circumstances (score, momentum, team condition, etc.) I’d say, yeah, sometimes, though tourth and eight is a rather dramatic circimstance when you could have said fourth and two and not made my answer seem so crazy.
by Tigernut on Apr 27, 2009 3:18 PM CDT reply actions
Ridiculous? OUCH!!
I know I’m not the most-informed poster here, but calling my statement ridiculous? And saying the D should be offended at the drafting of a punter? Hmm…. won’t say that’s ridiculous, but….. c’mon, let’s face it. Drafting a punter is an insult to the offense OR a gift to the defense.
Maybe both? Is that so ridiculous?
by Tigernut on Apr 29, 2009 4:38 PM CDT reply actions
WFTV Ch. 9 Video - 38yo rookie punter/quarterback looks for his place in pro football
For those of you who don’t know Mr. FakePunts: www.fakepunts.com
As I told the editor from the Winnipeg Free Press; Although I punted a 5.63 second hang time punt at the Stampeders 2009 tryout and a 5.9 sec. 52 yarder, wind aided, timed by two witnesses two days prior (hang times only produced by a small number of current NFL punters such as Shane Lechler, Andy Lee, Mike Scifres, Matt Turk, … and yet its likely none of them have hit a 6.0 this year, … with passing skills that are still above and beyond all other punters), I’m getting attention, but not the serious attention I’m looking for… Since the Blue Bombers refused to allow me to tryout in Deland this year…It looks like I’ll have to come back next year for both the NFL and CFL open camps, with a record breaking, mind blowing, semi-consistent 6.0-6.2 sec. hang time punts and we’ll see what happens…
4/6/09 WFTV Channel 9 Orlando – Sports at 9 – Chris Edwards: “Working On A Dream -38-year-old punter/quarterback looks for his place in pro football.”
http://www.wftv.com/video/19102290/index.html
Although Sports Anchor Joe Kepner only filmed 2 punts on camera, where he was able to track the football hang time from foot-to-ground, (the punt on the preview news coverage, on the website), was a 5.0 second hang time punt. A punt on the full story was a 4.2. Just a few punts later (the punt aired twice near the end of the full story), I launched a monster 5.6+ at 50+ yards net with a 1.00 sec. hand-to-foot (which is probably a faster avg. getoff than all of the above punters, given my unique 1 1/2 step punting style). After that punt I turned and said… “take that one to the bank”.
http://www.fakepunts.com/punt563.jpg

by 























