CSC Interview: Kenny Wilkerson Part Two
We now continue with with part two of my discussion with Kenny Wilkerson. Today's topics include Reggie Bush, Payton/McAllister tension and Benson's pivotal role in landing the 2013 Super Bowl.
Thanks once again to Mr. Wilkerson for taking time to answer my questions. I truly appreciate it.
CSC: Where do you stand on Reggie Bush?
KW: I think the same thing today about Reggie Bush that I thought when I first laid eyes on him and watched him up close and personal, especially his rookie year in 2006. Reggie is an outstanding football player. No question about it. People who say he is a bust are completely nuts. He is not a bust. He is an outstanding football player. He has unbelievable quickness, ability, knowledge and smarts.
He's got the same type of brain as Ricky Williams. People used to knock Williams, and deservedly so because of how quirky he was, but Ricky was so smart. He never made mental mistakes. Reggie is in that same category. But he's not the back that Ricky was. He's not the tank that Williams was. You can't give the ball to Reggie Bush twenty to twenty-five times a game for sixteen games He's just not physically big enough to hold up to the pounding that he's going to take. Can you get the ball to Reggie 20 times a week? Yes. But handing it off to him? No. There's a big difference. There is a big difference between handing the ball to Reggie and getting the ball to Reggie.
Reggie is like other players that have been around for years. Warrick Dunn, Eric Metcalf, Mel Gray. He's a weapon and he needs to be used as a weapon. He needs to be used with a lot of motion. Have the defense guessing. Is he lining up with the receivers? Is he lining up in backfield? Is he lining up in the slot? He needs to keep them guessing. And they do it with him sometimes. But in my opinion, I just don't think they do that enough.
He's been knocked by a lot of critics who claim that he's not a good football player because they ask him to do things sometimes that he's just not capable of doing. If you get him into some space and use him properly then Reggie is going to score a lot of points for you. He has a nose for the endzone and he knows how to get there but you've got to give him that room. You've got to get him that space. I know they try to do it and they would read this and say, "Kenny doesn't know what he's talking about. We do try to get Reggie in space." And they do. I just don't think they do it enough.
I think they get too hard headed and Payton tries to give him the ball too much between the tackles trying to prove that he's right and everybody else is wrong and that Reggie can run between the tackles. He's just not that kind of guy and I think that's one of the big problems with the team. I think the problem lies in the hard-headedness of trying to do things that you're not capable of doing. Or chucking away the game plan too fast in the first quarter because its not working and they're not running the ball effectively and reverting too quickly to Drew throwing it fifty to sixty times. I think they give up too easily on what they plan to do and he gets too hard headed in trying to convince everybody that he knows what he's doing and that he is smarter than everybody else.
CSC: You're talking about Sean Payton?
KW: Yes. I believe with any organization or any team the head coach is the number one person held accountable. He's got the final say. He's got the headset on. Offensively and defensively. I don't care if it's an offensively minded coach or a defensively minded coach. He's the one who has to be held accountable. He's the one who, out of the blue, called all these trick plays and all these reverses and these very unconventional things in trying to out-smart everybody. There is a reason that Jim Fassell took away the playcalling duties from Sean Payton and they [the Giants] started playing better offensively. There's also a reason that his years in Dallas, when he was an assistant under Parcells, he was not the play caller. Bill Parcells said it when Payton first came here. The two of them are very good friends and they have a lot of respect for each other but he said something along the lines of, "He gets a little too crazy sometimes."
And that has proven to be true. Just look at what has happened in the last three seasons. There has been a ton of times where, out of the blue, he's running some kind of trick play. He's running the Superdome special. As far as I'm concerned the Superdome special worked the first time they used it in the Monday night game against Atlanta when they re-opened the Dome and every time they've tried to use it since then it's been a disaster. I'm not making up things that haven't happened. It's happened in the last three years. He just pulls these trick plays out of nowhere sometimes and I think it's one of the big things that's hurting them.
CSC: Do you think Deuce will ever play in the NFL again?
KW: No question. I don't think there's any question about it. Deuce can still play. I think Deuce proved last year that he can still play. I think it was very frustrating for him and I think it was a slap in the face that he was kept on the sidelines as much as he was. He should have been on the field more than he was. I think he proved that he was still capable of playing. Can Deuce rip off a thirty, forty or fifty yarder anymore? No. That top-end speed and that breakaway speed is gone because of injury and age. But can he still pound it in there and get you five or ten yards a pop? Break tackles? Does he have a nose for the endzone? Absolutely. Deuce McAllister has as good of a nose for football as anyone that's ever worn a Saints uniform. I think they insulted him and I think it was a slap in the face how much they kept him on the sidelines last year.
There were times in the 2007 season when similar things were going on. There were times in the 2006 season when things like that were going on. For example, in the 2006 season there was a game near the end of the year when Deuce had a big day rushing the football. There was one particular series when the Saints started deep in their own zone and they gave the ball to Deuce. Deuce pounded the ball down the field. Play after play after play. Give it to Deuce. Give it to Deuce. Give it to Deuce. He was killing people. He mauled his way down the field. They get into the red zone and they pull him out and put Reggie in to score and get the touchdown. Sean Payton even said to his coaches, "Let's get Reggie in there. I want Reggie to score." Deuce was astounded. He was befuddled. He had done all the work and they were letting Reggie go in to score the touchdown.
CSC: What was going on there?
KW: I think that it's Sean Payton trying to convince the world that Reggie Bush is a star and a great player. Trying to feed his ego. They had half the team standing there wondering what the heck is going on and it had Deuce extremely ticked of. But Deuce, being the pro that he is, never said anything. Deuce never complained. Never complained publicly, nor will he ever. He never said anything. To his credit, it showed how big of a man he really is. Deuce McAllister is not only the best player that I've ever seen in a Saints uniform that had a nose for football but, in my opinion, is the number one Saint of all time and has taken over the title from Archie Manning. I think he is the most beloved Saint of all-time right now. Now, Drew Brees may become that in years to come and there are some other people that may come along that may take the title but Archie held it for an awfully long time and I think that title now goes to Deuce McAllister. The most beloved player.
Why Sean Payton has that insistence on trying to get Reggie the ball and trying to get Reggie into the end zone? Why he did that in that season? I have no idea. If you asked Payton why he did that he would look at you like you had three heads and deny it. That happens a lot with Payton. People are not stupid. They can tell. Fans can tell. People know what's going on. I'll let you in on a big secret about what goes on in the NFL...Ninety percent of the things that the fans talk about and say amongst each other, good and bad, the players are also saying to themselves as well. They are people just like everybody else and they say the same stuff that the fans say. Ninety percent of it.
CSC: Did Payton dislike Deuce?
KW: Deuce carried a big stick in that locker room. Deuce didn't talk much but when he talked, they all listened. Deuce was the leader of that football team, he just didn't talk a whole lot. When he did, everybody went along with what he had to say. I think when Deuce McAllister did open his mouth, he had a more powerful voice than Sean Payton. And I think Sean Payton couldn't deal with that and he wanted him gone.
I think a very similar thing happened with Joe Horn. It wasn't that Joe couldn't play anymore. It was that Joe was outspoken. Joe had a voice and did open his mouth a whole lot more than Deuce. He carried a lot of weight in that locker room. He had a lot of respect. And people listened to him. Over the years Sean Payton has cleared out practically everyone from the old regime. Not everyone, but most.
Look at Mike Karney. You're talking about the consumate pro and they got rid of Mike Karney. Karney had a voice. He carried some weight and had respect in that locker room. Did they upgrade by signing Heath Evans? Getting Heath Evans could very well have been a move made because he fits better into Sean Payton's offense. He's more versatile. But there are other issues to be addressed on this football team rather than tinkering with a position that was fine. There was nothing wrong with Mike Karney. That's the question. Do they really have enough good football players that they have the liberty to tinker with a position like fullback? There are more needs. More lineman, more secondary. And the biggest thing, in my mind, is linebacker.
They landed a stud in Vilma. But he's on the field with other players that are just B players. Nothing against Scott Fujita. He's a great guy and a consumate pro but he's not an A+ player. And they're still playing with Simoneau and Shanle. Guys that they got off the street a week before the regular season started in 2006 because in training camp of 2006 they realized they had no linebackers. And they're still playing for them. It's not that I have anything against Mark Simoneau or Scott Shanle but these are guys that were pulled off the street that are still, especially Shanle, a big part of their defense.
It's all about linebackers. It always has been and it always will be. Linebackers are always the key to a powerhouse defense. You get good linebackers and then you build forwards and you build backwards with lineman and secondary. But if you don't have outstanding linebackers - and not just one - if you don't have at least two or three outstanding linebackers you are going to struggle. Teams are going to be able to do whatever they want against you. That all goes back to my comments about Gregg Williams. He still has a lot of the same players. I know they've brought in some other people like Darren Sharper and that may make a difference but he's still going to be coaching basically the same group.
CSC: How do you feel about New Orleans getting the 2013 Super Bowl?
KW: It's tremendous. There are not enough good words in the english language to congratulate the city and Mr. Benson for getting that game. And make no mistake about it, that game was awarded to New Orleans because of Tom Benson. The sports foundation and the city put together a wonderful proposal and did a great job. They always do. But Tom Benson went in that room and told the other owners and the group he'd really like to have the game and nobody was going to tell Mr. Benson no. He has not asked for a game in a long time. A lot of games have been awarded over the years because of owners in particular cities telling other owners they'd like to have the game and they give it to them. Now there have been a lot of games awarded to cities because they shell out the money and build new stadiums. But that game was awarded to this city because of Tom Benson.
1 recs |
46 comments
|
Comments
Interesting...
I wonder if there are other reporters with the same viewpoint on Sean Payton.
There have been many coaches with the creed “My way or the highway”. Some have even won Super Bowls.
Does he see Sean’s approach as detrimental to the team? Does a team need an Alpha Male, or can there be more than one strong leader? I have no idea how Payton and McAllister got along. But I would think having a strong, but silent, presence like Deuce in the locker room that everyone looked up to couldn’t hurt.
I wonder if Payton will feel a backlash from some of the veterans over cutting Deuce. I know Deuce said it was just business, but it had to hurt coming from a team he helped lead through some of the toughest times in franchise history to one of the most successful.
I think Kenny’s spot on about the way they abuse Bush. I’ve found myself on many an occasion yelling “Noooooo!” at the television when he took an inside hand-off. “Open space! Open space! Happy place!”
His comments on Payton sure will light a fire under some of our posters.
Do you know what it means...
by MissingNO on May 22, 2009 7:05 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
What, MNO, you think we have to defend Payton and insult Kenny just because he slammed our idol or something? Sorry. Not going to happen. Payton is a big boy he can defend himself that way if he wants to.
Payton is arrogant. Thing is, he’s also right more often than Kenny gives him credit for. Horn was (and is) washed up, and he was a locker room cancer close to the level of TO in my book. Any player who wants to skip practice because he’s “hurt” but then still wants to play on Sunday doesn’t belong on my team. And Reggie has to be able to at least occasionally run between the tackles. Maybe they’ve done it too much at times, but you have to do it some and until you try you don’t know for sure what the right number is. They still don’t know the “perfect” number and never will, they have to keep playing around with it to see what it is. And Payton’s also been wrong, even VERY wrong, as times too. Deuce he was almost certainly wrong on. Although the contract numbers were too high for what Deuce can give you anymore, that doesn’t mean getting rid of him was the ideal answer. Jason David was an obvious screw-up.
But what he fails to understand is that it’s actually a good thing that Payton is a gambler. He always has been one and always will be. And that is a good thing. He can get too aggressive in his gambling, and that isn’t a good thing, but you have to be willing to gamble a fair bit to have any chance of winning. He who will not risk cannot win. It’s as true in football as it is in the military as it is in just about anything else. You have to try stuff and hope it works. Sometimes it does and sometimes it doesn’t. When it doesn’t, admit it and try something else. When it does, don’t get too elated, it probably won’t next time. And Payton does that pretty well in my book. Not perfectly of course, but pretty well.
Now on to other things. I kind of laugh about his idea that you “have” to have great linebackers. Just because the Dome Patrol did doesn’t mean that every team HAS to have great ones. Name two of the three starting linebackers on the Titans without consulting Yahoo’s depth charts. What about the Colts? Not a great defense but not horrible either, and most people don’t have a clue who even one of their starting LBs is. Or what about the Giants? Great defense there… who are the LBs again? Most of us know the Punkthers too well, so it’s probably not a fair test, but go ask a Colt fan about it. Wish them luck they’ll need it. Lets see who else runs the 4-3 and has a good or great defense. The Eagles… who are their LBs? Anybody know? What about the Redskins? The Bengals D was very good last year especially considering they got absolutely no help from such a horrible offense, name two starting linebackers from that team… I’ll bet most of you can’t even name one… well except for those who know about Rivers because of the new Hines Ward Rule.
Everybody “knows” that the linebackers are critical in the 3-4, but they are NOT as critical in the 4-3. They can’t be pathetic. NOBODY can be pathetic and you still have a good team. But they don’t all have to be superstars either. And even in the 3-4 it’s still the scheme and the DC. Harrison may have done a really good job last year but he got cut something like four times before because he sucked so bad. Five years from now somebody else will be the next Steeler superstar linebacker and everybody will rave about how they keep drafting these superstars, and I’ll laugh at their complete lack of understanding of how the 3-4 works and just how much of it is Dick LeBeau’s brains rather than Harrison and his sequel.
Sorry Kenny. The LB corp could still use some upgrades. So could half the rest of the D for that matter. But the team with the best talent does NOT always win. If they did the Steelers would go 0-16 several years straight. (I’d kinda like that actually.) OK maybe slight exaggeration but they would not have made the playoffs for decades. And if the best talent always wins why did Dallas miss the playoffs? Why did the Eagles lose to the Cardinals, or even the Punkthers (much as we detest them they aren’t lacking in talent). The best team doesn’t always win, the best talent doesn’t always win. So yeah we could use some upgrades still, but I’m not going to worry about it. I’m in this for the long haul. I don’t care that much if the Saints win the SB this year. I’d love for them to do so. But what I want more is a team that will be competitive for the next decade or more and I think they are doing a pretty good job of building that.
by FriarBob on May 22, 2009 7:47 AM CDT reply actions 1 recs
And now, what I can't agree on...
Because I really should check what I’ve written before hitting Post…
You say that Reggie has to be able to run between the tackles, at least occasionally. I disagree. You use enough motion, have him lining up all over the place, it’s not like the defense will just all crowd the perimeter if he lines up in the backfield. Even if they do, Brees is smart enough that then all you do is audible to a pass pattern over the middle or run him on a little Texas route. The other great thing about having a tendency which is so easily identified is being able to design plays that play off of it, such as a toss trap with Evans or a HB pass.
by MarcusR on May 22, 2009 9:21 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
In theory, yes
In reality, no.
Nothing works forever. Nothing works every time. Even Drew, good as he is, doesn’t complete 100% of his passes. He can’t. Even against the Raiders he couldn’t get every single one although he got very close. And that was only one game against a really poor team.
In theory you can show a tendency and then design plays to play off the defense reacting to what they think they see. In reality nothing you design will continue to work forever. Including them reacting to the apparent tendency. You HAVE to mix it up, thoroughly, and on a constant basis. And that does include occasional runs between the tackles. They don’t have to be right up the gut (i.e. between the guards) but they at least occasionally have to be between the tackles. And in fact they need to be more than just occasionally. If they know you are always going to the perimeter you will find five guys waiting for him every time.
I’ve watched in the past some very good players accomplish absolutely jack squat against a horrible team because as horrible as that opposing team was the play-calling was even worse because it was predictable. And in many ways predictability is the one cardinal sin of the NFL.
by FriarBob on May 22, 2009 10:14 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
That cuts two ways though, doesn't it?
One, on defense they only need to make the wrong decision once and Reggie’s gone.
Two, nobody’s suggesting that something will work forever, or even for most of one season (god knows there’s enough turnaround at the end of each season that one can’t imagine something consistently working much further than that). Classic example of this is the Wildcat. Nobody thinks it’ll be a primary offense next season, it’s just another wrinkle to put people off balance.
Up until now, Reggie Bush hasn’t been able to run between the tackles. What he has been able to do is make people miss in space, and take a defense’s eyes with him even when he doesn’t have the ball. Why not keep putting him in a position to succeed, making the best of his talents? No-one’s suggesting we start designing multiple quarterback runs for Drew Brees, despite the fact that it would add another aspect to our offense that would keep the defense guessing…
Three, as I said before, if you see them putting five guys on the damn perimeter, they’re over-pursuing and leaving a whacking great hole in the middle for either a misdirection such as a toss trap or counter, a cutback on a designed toss play or an audible to a pass play which targets the middle of the field.
Four, last year we were predictable in large parts. Teams knew we were going to pass a significant majority of the time, and they still couldn’t stop us.
“Mixing it up” is what a lot of people look for in an offense. They figure keeping the defense guessing is pretty much the number one thing to do. Newsflash: it’s not. Getting the job done is.
Take the Pats’ nearly-flawless 07 season. Teams knew that, on the way to the red-zone, Wes Welker would get catch-and-run opportunities. Teams knew that, when in the red zone, there was a jump-ball going to Moss. Jesus, against the Jets they triple-covered him and he still came down with it! I know what you’re going to say, the Superbowl was evidence of the downside of the strategy, but in that game they sufficiently changed their blocking schemes, leaving tackles one-on-one with ends rather than keeping backs or TEs in to chip as they’d done throughout the rest of the season, that I believe they lost that game as a result of moving away from their game plan rather than by sticking to it.
I don’t care if a team knows you’re going to throw the ball deep 80% of the time, if you can pull it off sufficiently frequently to score more points than them, then for goodness’ sake dance with who brung ya!
by MarcusR on May 22, 2009 11:37 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Once again yes...
And no.
You see, everybody “knew” what the Patriots were going to do… except that every time they gave them another look. It was in fact often the exact same play in the end… but the lineup was different each time. So people kept getting burnt by the same play because it didn’t look like the same play when the boys came out of the huddle. And then just for fun they’d throw the same line-up out there for three or four plays in a row, but it was actually different play each time.
People “know” we’re going to throw it deep. But what they don’t know for sure is who it’s going to. It could be Devery. It could be Lance. It could even be Colston, though somewhat less likely, but not like it’s impossible. It could even be Bush or Shockey if we set it up right. So even though we run the same basic play, we STILL “mix it up” because the target of the play is different each time. And then we line up with four wides and run Reggie up the gut on a draw or two. Same idea as what the Patriots did, different way of executing it.
As for them “putting” five guys on the perimeter, if you really think they are doing that you aren’t paying ANY attention at all. No they aren’t doing that. Only an idiot would do that. What they are doing is reacting to the fact that they see Bush has the ball and they know where he’s going so they run to get there first. And when Bush was predictable by always running outside, they knew it was going to happen and they were able to stop it despite his talent and speed. IF you turn that into a misdirection play by faking giving him the ball then sometimes it will work… ONCE. You keep acting like it’s a cure-all to use him in misdirection plays. Sorry. It isn’t.
Oh and sorry, the Pats didn’t lose because they went away from their gameplan. The lost because the Giants forced them OUT of their gameplan by making Brady feel like a wild animal being chased by 500 hunters.
So once again, you have some of the right ideas, but completely blow it on execution. You DO have to keep going with what works. But at the exact same time you still have to “mix it up” as well. How you “mix it up” may be in different lineups to disguise the same play. It may be in the same line-ups to disguise that it’s a different play. It could be other ways as well. The only way to “get the job done” when you aren’t playing the equivalent of a JV team is to fool the opponent. And that means you have to keep them guessing by “mixing it up”.
by FriarBob on May 22, 2009 12:18 PM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
C'mon, man...
Ok, so where above did I mention running plays out of the same formation? Different formations and motions are always important in offensive football. I was at a coaching clinic last year and the OC from Montana State was telling a story to illustrate that exact point. He was headed into a game where one of his former GAs was on the defensive staff for the opposing team. He ran into him in a corridor and the guy was carrying a file about a foot thick. When asked what it was, the guy said “Coach, these are all your plays so that we can prepare against them”. The OC knew his playbook was like 25 pages thick, but they’d run most of their plays out of multiple formations and motions, and the defensive coach had to account for every last one of them. So yeah, I completely agree that multiple shifts and formations can disguise the same play quite brilliantly.
When you say “they know where he’s going so they run to get there first”, when referring to teams going to the perimeter against Bush, that’s entirely what I mean by over-pursuit. Nobody’s seriously suggesting putting five guys on the perimeter at the beginning of the play, and I think you knew that.
In the 07 SB, the Giants did an excellent job of hounding Brady. But, if you look back over the season, the Pats had faced teams that just pinned their ears back and went at them and still didn’t change their game plan. In Week 11, when they played the Eagles who, let’s face it, are pretty much the poster-children for the “I bet my D linemen can reach your QB before he wants to throw it” school of defense, Brady threw for 380 yards (while being sacked only 3 times), while they called just 14 rush plays for like 30-some yards. The Giants blitzing multiple times from weird and wonderful sets and stunts didn’t force the Pats out of their gameplan. The Pats moved away from a very successful blocking scheme and it cost them dear.
Sounds like we’re dangerously close to agreeing ;-)
by MarcusR on May 23, 2009 7:16 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Boom!!!
In search of stujo4! ! !
by Big and Easy on May 22, 2009 9:32 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Deuce
I admit will admit that i miss Deuce, and I agree with Kenny that they slapped him in the face too many times. I CANNOT believe that they gave Reggie the touchdown in 2006 after Deuce did all the work. It sounds like some kind of horrible teen football movie. Reggie is a great football player, and we are privileged to have him on our team, but come on. Give respect where it is due. I still believe letting Deuce go was a horrible idea, but I see that it was for his betterment as a person. I have been in the same situation, and understand that there was a lot of stress and pressure involved with the situation that Deuce was in.
I must say that bringing Kenny Wilkerson in for the questions was an excellent move. He has added a fire to the conversations and a wealth of knowledge. Bravo and keep it coming Kenny.
by Brazil meets LA on May 22, 2009 8:34 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Alright group
Let’s get Payton fired and Kenny hired as our next head coach. Payton is an idiot? And Kenny Wilkerson has all the answers? Who would have guessed that Kenny Wilkerson would know more about personel, play calling, and running a locker room than Sean Payton. I for one would have never guessed it in a million years. I was sure wrong and can admit I didn’t even know who Kenny Wilkerson was 4 days ago.
In search of stujo4! ! !
by Big and Easy on May 22, 2009 9:38 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Come to the dark side...
…we have cookies…
Seriously though man, you need to learn the difference between honest constructive criticism and calling someone an idiot.
by MarcusR on May 23, 2009 7:18 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Hey
Y’all did get that that was sarcasm? I was not really calling anybody an idiot.
In search of stujo4! ! !
by Big and Easy on May 23, 2009 9:56 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Deuce will be back.
I just feel it. He’s working out and 101% percent determined to play again. However, as much as I would like to see him play, I love Deuce more as a person than a player and I am very worried about how much more abuse his poor creaky knees can take. It would be horrible to see him have to use a cane for the rest of his life. But, if he wants to play what can we say? Dog will hunt!! Yet, I think it would be great, if he does retire, for him to get a spot on the coaching staff so that he can still give that cool leadership and sage advice to our players.
There is nobody so irritating as someone who is less intelligent than us and yet is wiser.
by Tigernut on May 22, 2009 9:57 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
P.S.
I don’t care if Benson was responsible for bringing the SB to New Orleans. I still think he’s a fat, greedy, disloyal bastard and I pray one day he will sell the team to Jimmy Buffett.
There is nobody so irritating as someone who is less intelligent than us and yet is wiser.
by Tigernut on May 22, 2009 9:59 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
credit where credit is due
I agree that LBs have been an issue for years – since Haslett. Vilma is awesome, and fujita is solid, but we need another solid player at least. Perhaps Morgan can be that, but I’ll believe it when I see it for a whole season.
Now, here’s the thing about Payton. Usually when he cuts somebody loose, he’s right. He may have had issues with Horn, but he was right to cut him. Horn was done. Karney, we’ll srr but I see no issue with getting a player that fits your offense better. It’s not like we paid Evans tons more that we would’ve paid Karney. This isn’t fantast football where you can only make so many transactions. Doing that didn’t preclude them from getting other players. We’ll see about Deuce as well. Hopefully he’s got football left in him, but I don’t think Payton makes personnel decisions based completely on ego
by SaintBevo on May 22, 2009 10:43 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Good question
CSC: Where do you stand on Reggie Bush?
I would have to say on his chest or torso. I doubt I would be able to keep my balance standing on him anywhere else.
There is nobody so irritating as someone who is less intelligent than us and yet is wiser.
by Tigernut on May 22, 2009 10:46 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Kenny makes some good points about Payton
Someone doesn’t believe that Payton could pull Deuce from the game to insert Reggie so Reggie can score the TD? Come on! I don’t know about the case Kenny cites, but I remember January 13, 2007 in the playoff game against the Eagles. Deuce was on fire that entire game. The Eagles didn’t have an answer for him. He was running people over to pick up yards and ultimately scored two TDs. I remember Moose Johnson commenting that Deuce was the “hot hand” that night and he was openly questioning Payton for not continuing to ride him to the win. In the later stages of the game when we had the lead and just needed to run out the clock, Payton pulls Deuce and inserts Reggie. Reggie fumbled the toss and the Eagles got the ball back in our territory. Why would Payton do that? Why not feed the ball to your big power back and the RB that had been running all over the Eagles all game? When we stopped the Eagles and got the ball back, Payton did just that, Deuce ran the ball three times, got the 1st down, and we ran out the clock.
I’m not saying Payton isn’t a good coach and I’m grateful he is coaching the Saints, but he does have blind spots and he can get a little crazy with his playcalling. I don’t think Kenny is saying he could better coach the team. Kenny has a bit of a frustrating history with Payton and knows the guy better than we do. Maybe that history taints his opinion and memory about Payton or maybe it doesn’t. I don’t know, but I couldn’t agree more with him when he talks about Deuce, but then again Deuce is my all-time favorite Saint and that makes me totally agree that Deuce wasn’t treated as fairly as he should have been under Payton. I expressed these frustrations here last September:
http://www.canalstreetchronicles.com/2008/9/16/615788/let-deuce-loose
Now, I’m not saying we should throw Payton under the bus by any means. I believe he can get us to the promise land this year with some help from Gregg Williams. But, I think Kenny’s comments about him are correct:
Deuce carried a big stick in that locker room. Deuce didn’t talk much but when he talked, they all listened. Deuce was the leader of that football team, he just didn’t talk a whole lot. When he did, everybody went along with what he had to say. I think when Deuce McAllister did open his mouth, he had a more powerful voice than Sean Payton. And I think Sean Payton couldn’t deal with that and he wanted him gone.
Payton carries a big ego and that ego can sometimes blind him to what’s best for the team. Not all the time, but some of the time. I agree that Deuce wasn’t worth the many millions he was due this year and his release was probably more about them not coming to contract terms than anything else. I just hope that knee heals and he is able to play again, even if it’s for a different team.
Go Saints!!!! Deuce may be gone, but he will never be forgotten.
by satchmo26 on May 22, 2009 10:52 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Wait a minute...
In the later stages of the game when we had the lead and just needed to run out the clock, Payton pulls Deuce and inserts Reggie. Reggie fumbled the toss and the Eagles got the ball back in our territory. Why would Payton do that? Why not feed the ball to your big power back and the RB that had been running all over the Eagles all game?
Could it be that Duece needed a rest? By your own admission, he’d worked his tail off all game. Not to mention that fact that, if Bush is going to improve, won’t he require some playing time? I don’t see that decision as all that bad, even if it did have unfortunate consequences. I mean, hell, this is typical armchair coaching by you. It’s easy to criticize a coache’s decision after you’ve seen the outcome.
There is nobody so irritating as someone who is less intelligent than us and yet is wiser.
by Tigernut on May 24, 2009 7:29 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
One of us?

Do you know what it means...
by MissingNO on May 22, 2009 12:07 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Wow!!
Where did you get a picture of Hap Glaudi’s Ghost? I was wondering what she looked liked.
In search of stujo4! ! !
by Big and Easy on May 22, 2009 12:26 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Nightmarish pic, dude!
That’s gonna be my face if we go 8-8 once again this season.
Go Saints!!!! Deuce may be gone, but he will never be forgotten.
by satchmo26 on May 22, 2009 12:30 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
What's REALLY disturbing
…is that it looks like Drew Brees.
Come home, Stuart...
by MtnExile on May 22, 2009 2:52 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
AHHHH! You may have something there.
Brees could look like that and I’d still probably follow him through the gates of hell, as long as he keeps performing like he has in the past. I hope I don’t have nightmares that include that face tonight.
Go Saints!!!! Deuce may be gone, but he will never be forgotten.
by satchmo26 on May 22, 2009 2:56 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
At least he has a decent haircut.
There is nobody so irritating as someone who is less intelligent than us and yet is wiser.
by Tigernut on May 22, 2009 5:05 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I wonder what it sounds like when that Cryptkeeper says "GAAAA!"
"Knock 'em the (- -) out!" - G Dub
by HansDat on May 22, 2009 6:52 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Is it ego?
or is it more the division of power, when he wants to be above reproach? I have to lean more to the later ,egos tend to get in the way and impede progress, so I believe that it come down to final authority and when he is inadvertently challenged he sees it as a threat.
Also to comment on the LB situation… If Morgan goes down, if he makes the team, we will struggle. Regardless of bob’s facts (I do like the idea, but D is always under appreciated and or unknown) we are extremely weak (old, injured or young and unproven) at that position. Really regarding GW’s influence on this group… you can only polish a turd so much, but at the end of the day it is still a turd… I know he will get more production out of the group via a higher rotation, but one injury can nip it all in the butt. (I am not referring to Morgan here)
by Norml912 on May 22, 2009 1:05 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Payton
I’ve said this a million times on da chronic, Payton has never been the same since the NFC championship. The saints have a 15-18 record starting with that game. Deuce is coming off a career game against Philly, and your playing in frigid, wet conditions. Deuce gets 6 carries. Drew attempts 49 passes.
2007 Reggie is the “starting tailback” to open the season. Payton was already working toward phasing Deuce out. Instead of having them both on the field at the same time (like in 2006) Payton was hell bent on showing the world that Reggie was his star running back. Deuce gets hurt, Payton gets to showcase his ability as an offensive “genius”. Draft offense for know reason. End result 7-9.
2008 Still trying to put Reggie in a role he is not suited fo. Refuses to run Deuce or Pierre on a consistant basis. Team lacks an “identity”, what are they? Media starts using the “F” word to describe them, finesse. Very appropriate in my opinion. No identity on defense, with a finesse offense that scores a lot of points but when it gets punched in the mouth fails to close out games. 8-8
Payton loves offense, flashy offense. He was and still is a “quarterback”. He does not want to give any running back whether it is Deuce, Reggie, or PT the ball 20-25 times a game. It is just not his style. That is why Karney and Deuce are gone, he does not want to use them even if they were healthy. He definitely does not want to hear the fans second guessing him on not playing Deuce either.
This style of play to me ultimately leads to failure. You can’t rely on Drew Brees to do it all. If he is off even a little bit we normally lose. When we have to play in bad weather we don’t have much to fall back on. In 2006 it was Deuce. Now it is this “hybrid” running attack of Reggie and PT. Plus our defense has not won a game for us in years.
I felt like most of the credit for the glorious 2006 season should be given to Payton. But if all his energy and talent is spent on engineering the best offense in the league (which for the most part he has done), than this offense has to close out these tough games even if it means scoring 50 points. Defense has always been on the back-burner for Payton and most of their free agent defensive players have been marginal at best, not stars.
I just feel like the Saints lost their one player that has that “toughness” that every team needs. Vilma is our best defensive player but you wouldn’t say he is a huge “hitter” or has a mean streak. Brees is obviously the team MVP, but he is also an X’s and O’s kind of guy like Payton. We did see some emotion from him last year and I hope we see plenty more this year. Football is a game of emotion. We need somebody, anybody, that can get this team going. We need that player when we are in the trenches you know you can count on him to impose his will on the other team, which in my opinion was Deuce.
by Ditka'sGhost on May 22, 2009 1:19 PM CDT reply actions 1 recs
Agreed. Rec'd it
I would only say this: Payton is by no means perfect, but neither is any other coach in the league, including Mr. Bill (videotape your opponents in game to learn their signals) Belichick. Maybe Payton has very logical reasons for doing what he does, but his penchant for secrecy leads people (myself included) to sometimes assume the worst. I’ll probably never understand his reasoning with Deuce the past three seasons when Deuce was healthy, even if he personally explained himself to me.
I know now that Deuce was having unreported knee problems for most of last year and my frustration with Payton over not playing him more has simmered down since. But, there were a few games when Deuce wasn’t taking the field and standing on the sideline with his helmet on and an unmistakable look of emotional hurt on his face. Maybe the medical report wasn’t as optimistic to Deuce playing as Deuce himself felt. Maybe Payton knew that and didn’t want to risk it. Or, maybe it’s like Kenny and D’s Ghost say. We’ll probably never know for sure. Jeff Duncan speculated last season that Payton was getting tired of the “DEEEUUUCE!” chants. I wonder if Payton called Jeff to ask “WTF?” after that like he did with Kenny over the Roman Harper injury. If Payton truly did feel that way about Deuce and his many fans, he would win d-bag of the year, IMHO. I hope that wasn’t true. Could he be that clueless?
But, I don’t won’t to turn against Payton or motivate anyone else to lose faith in him. He’s our head coach. He’s not perfect. He can be both confusing and frustrating at times. But, he’s proven to be a better coach than many other teams’ coaches. My reckless optimism for this season won’t allow me to give up on him yet.
Go Saints!!!! Deuce may be gone, but he will never be forgotten.
by satchmo26 on May 22, 2009 2:35 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Satchmo26
Thanks, I always know my brother will back me up when it comes to talk of the “Deuce”
by Ditka'sGhost on May 22, 2009 2:58 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I've always got your back, bro
It’s still possible we might see Deuce again in black and gold, but I’m not optimistic because of the reasons you, Kenny, and I have stated here. But, you never know. I just hope he heals up enough to play for any team this year….except the Bears. I would be heartbroken to see #26 in that uniform.
Go Saints!!!! Deuce may be gone, but he will never be forgotten.
by satchmo26 on May 22, 2009 3:07 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I've stick with the coach before...
…and still will give him benefit of the doubt on how Deuce “situation” was handled last year
I just can’t imagine Payton could be as hypocrit as giving McAllister a hug on national TV after #26 broke most TD’s record for the Saints and secretly wish he was already gone. Otherwise:
he would win d-bag of the year
Just get the D going!
by FrenchFreak on May 23, 2009 8:10 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
i would agree that Payton did get Reggie the ball a lot...
He didn’t commit to running the ball a lot whether with Reggie or anybody…I don’t think it would matter who was back there. Payton is pass happy. Point Blank!!!! If he was forcing the ball to Reggie then we’d see Reggie’s carries per game average be a lot higher than 10. Late last year Payton seemed to get it and actually start running the rock. Personally, I don’t think it would matter who was back there, cuz when u commit to the run then u’ll get results. Bush just happens to get the back lash for this because he’ll get a few carries sporadically ushered his way. I remember people harping on PT earlier in the season but once he started actually carrying the ball, he did what was expected. Payton needs to be more balanced!!! That’s all.
Don't worry I got your back cuz...
by TAYDIGGA on May 24, 2009 12:20 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I wonder how he and GW will mesh
they both seem to have similar styles (GW more explicative), but will Payton divert to GW in the locker room for defensive motivational speeches?
When we need to get stops who does the talking the coach or the defensive coordinator… I feel a rift coming :(
by Norml912 on May 22, 2009 2:51 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Possibly.
There will be one of two things that comes out of this marriage of SP and GW.
1) things don’t work and we get a MAJOR blowup and rift
2) things do work and we get a best-friends-forever situation
I’m hoping for #2 but one or the other will happen. With these guy’s personalities and egos and whatnot I don’t see any other option.
by FriarBob on May 22, 2009 3:04 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don't care which happens if we win.
Payton’s tenure is coming to a close within 2 years if we don’t get another playoff victory.
by xen-cuts on May 22, 2009 7:48 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
My 2 cents
Kenny talks a lot. I agree with just about everything he said.
by xen-cuts on May 22, 2009 7:49 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Let's face it...
The Saints are a farm team. They are a team where young players/coaches make a name for themselves so that they can get hired by a real team and where old players/coaches go to end their careers. I wish it weren’t so, but after watching them for 30 years, I can’t help but wonder if it isn’t true.
There is nobody so irritating as someone who is less intelligent than us and yet is wiser.
by Tigernut on May 23, 2009 9:39 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Those grapes a little sour, Kenny?
Kenny, I cannot believe anything you say about the Saints because they were the ones who had you terminated at WWL. What did you expect to happen when you started airing your “little secrets” about the Saints at SR.com? Now we are supposed to believe you have some objectivity or credibility? Doubtful.
by RayneMan on May 24, 2009 1:41 PM CDT reply actions 2 recs

by 





















