Addition by Subtraction or Addition by...Addition?
It's a fact that after every season, NFL teams begin the process of improving their roster during the long off-season months. These improvements can come about in two different ways: Getting rid of certain players/coaches and adding others. Most often, and rightfully so, it's the big name free agent signings or the top round draft choices that get talked about most. But after the Saints didn't re-sign Josh Bullocks and let go of Gary Gibbs this off-season, I started wondering if getting rid of a player or coach could be just as important to the betterment of a team as who they add.
We know defensive coordinator Gary Gibbs has been replaced by Gregg Williams and hope this is going to be an improvement for the Saints. If this turns out to be the case, which half of this defensive coordinator transition would factor most in the Saints defensive improvement; the absence of Gibbs or the presence of Williams? In reality, it's a combination of the two. But is it possible that one could play a larger role than the other? Perhaps Gibbs' system really was that bad and any new defensive coordinator would provide better results than what Gibbs was able to accomplish. If that was the case than I think it would be safe to assume that getting rid of Gibbs was more important than actually choosing the correct replacement, whoever that may have been. And this logic could just as easily apply to the players on the field. Anybody has got to be better than Josh Bullocks, right? Also remember that with a limited number of spots, roster re-arranging is a zero sum game. Every time the Saints sign a player, someone else has to go. Are the Saints getting rid of the right players or are they releasing a future Pro Bowler?
So let's get a little philosophical with this today. On the whole, have the Saints improved more because of the players they have added or because of the players they've gotten rid of this off-season? Are there at least specific instances where this was true this off-season? Is it even possible that getting rid of a player/coach is more important than acquiring one?
As a quick refresher and to help facilitate discussion, here is a list of some personnel that are not returning to New Orleans this season as well as some players who will be making their regular season debut with the team. This list is meant for illustration purposes only and is not making any comparisons.
| Position | Former Player | New Player |
| Def. Coordinator |
Gary Gibbs |
Gregg Williams |
| CB | Aaron Glenn | Malcolm Jenkins |
| S | Kevin Kaesviharn | Darren Sharper |
| CB |
Mike McKenzie |
Jabari Greer |
| S | Josh Bullocks | Pierson Prioleau |
| TE | Mark Campbell | Darnell Dinkins, Dan Campbell |
| RB | Aaron Stecker | Lynell Hamilton |
| DT | Hollis Thomas | Rod Coleman |
| C | Matt Lehr | Nick Leckey |
| DT | Brian Young | DeMario Pressley |
| FB | Mike Karney | Heath Evans |
| DE | Josh Savage | Paul Spicer |
0 recs |
10 comments
|
Comments
I don't think they can be separated
Cutting T.O is an example of addition by subtraction: you don’t really care all that much who replaces him, you just want him gone. Having a lesser player makes for a stronger team.
But in the Saints’ case, each subtraction was for the purpose of adding someone better. Whether the new guys actually are better remains to be seen; but the subtraction and addition go hand in hand.
Will the Saints’ defense be better because Gibbs is gone or Williams is now here? Answer: yes.
Come home, Stuart...
by MtnExile on May 26, 2009 6:53 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Jacksonville...
….did allow more 20 yards passes then the Saints (55-53) even if Double-G was coaching them last year.
Just get the D going!
by FrenchFreak on May 26, 2009 9:10 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Except for...
I feel the same way about Kaesviharn and Bullocks as you feel about T.O.
by ReggieVilma on May 26, 2009 2:29 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
the lost of gibbs was a big gain
i don’t know how much actual control that gibbs had on personal, but they did a terrible job of keeping and bringing in talent . bullocks was shaky from day one, yet KK was the only guy really brought in to challenge him , in 3-4 years. i hate to mention the dreaded jason david, i blame gibbs, but were these “his guys”,or the front office’s?
the new guy in charge has really put his stamp on the D right off the bat. it’s easy to see he’s got more control of personal. we drafted his kinda guys, brought in a couple more. unfortunately we cut some great guys, young, hollis,and my cap lock salute to MCKENZIE, they will be missed.
bottom line,the saints D is better today than last year, at least i think so
by r c a on May 26, 2009 8:28 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Dave
I got up early, ran in the snow (Rocky style) listening to Eye of the Tiger on my Ipod, laced-up my boxing gloves and logged into CSC………….Where is Hap Glaudi’s Tuesday morning rant about nothing that matters? What I am supposed to do with all of this bottled-up frustration? ……………Hurry, somebody with an opposing viewpoint before I take it out on an employee!!
In search of stujo4! ! !
by Big and Easy on May 26, 2009 10:46 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Somewhere in between
I think the positive is somewhere between “slightly” and “every move was genius.” I also think that the most important thing is to get a good start on defense, especially since the first opponent is Detroit and if things look bad there, well it will be a catstrophy. I doubt that will happen. Get momentum the first game and appear as if GW and the changes are miracles, especially since the 2nd game is vs. the Eagles in Phila and that will be a big challenge. I hope defensive coordinator Jim Johnson recovers so well from his cancer treatments that he decides to retire and smell the roses because he is amazing. In my mind, Johnson is the best NFL coach/coordinator in the last decade, bar none.
by Philinwood on May 26, 2009 11:18 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Detroit
My feelings exactly. And I worry that Detroit is a “trap” game. The Saints beat them like a bass drum last year, and may be thinking they’ll have an easy time of it…but every NFL team is, after all, an NFL team. If they weren’t any good, they’d be playing pickup games in the park on Saturdays. The Saints had better concentrate in that game, because I would bet the new regime in Detroit is going to have the Lions fired up and hungry. Coming into the Dome and beating the league’s best offense would be one hell of a statement game for them.
Come home, Stuart...
by MtnExile on May 26, 2009 12:21 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
what were the lions' most significant upgrades?
by nanvinnie on May 26, 2009 12:39 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Head coach...
and GM.
Go Saints!!!! Deuce may be gone, but he will never be forgotten.
by satchmo26 on May 26, 2009 12:53 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
jim johnson
he and monte kiffen are the two best, sad to see them go,except on the sundays we had to face them.
by r c a on May 26, 2009 1:29 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs





















