Canal Street Chronicles: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
Around SBN: Spencer Hall's Sports Meme Power Rankings

CSC Interview: Sports Illustrated's Damon Hack

Those of you who read CSC regularly know that I am a fan of Sports Illustrated and have had a subscription to the magazine for quite a while now. Every year at this time the good people over at SI put out their NFL Season Preview issue which includes off-season analysis, scouting reports and predictions for every single team in the league. 2009 is no different and Sports Illustrated has just come out with this years edition. Though the hard copy hasn't actually arrived at my house yet, the online version is already available for everyone's reading pleasure, or displeasure, as the case may be. It seems the SI team doesn't think too highly of the Saints this year and actually predict them to finish third in the division.

I have focused this summer on interviewing sports journalists (Jeff Duncan, Kenny Wilkerson) to not only learn more about the Saints but also to gain some insight about the world of sports journalism at all levels. With the summer officially winding down and the start of the season so close now, it's only fitting to finish it all up with one last interview. This week I had the distinct pleasure of posing a few questions to Sports Illustrated writer, Damon Hack, who was responsible for covering the Saints' section of SI's season preview. We discussed his thoughts on the team this year, the NFC South, his time with Sports Illustrated and the world of journalism in general. Enjoy.

 

CSC: What's the process for compiling these season previews for Sports Illustrated?

DH: I and several other reporters travel to training camps, talk to players and coaches, and try to get a feel for the strengths and weaknesses of a team going into a season. It's a good way to make contact with teams, learn their personnel, and predict how will they might do.

 

CSC: Did you get to choose your teams or were they assigned? Does Peter King get first choice?

DH: My teams were assigned by my football editor. I'm not sure if Peter gets first choice, but if he does he deserves it! He is a great football writer, a wonderful teammate, and a reporter whose work I've admired for a long time.

Star-divide

CSC: Did you get a chance to visit training camp?

DH: I did visit New Orleans for the second straight training camp, but I actually missed practice this year (delays at New York 's LaGuardia Airport - never fun). I was still able to catch up with Jon Stinchcomb and Jonathan Vilma and both guys were tremendous interviews. It was great getting perspective on the Saints offense and defense from two of the team leaders. Both players were quietly excited about the prospects for the Saints in 2009. 

 

CSC: What do you consider to be the Saints biggest off-season acquisition?

DH: Gregg Williams, the Saints new defensive coordinator. No doubt about it. The Saints' defense cost the team too many games last year with mistakes and breakdowns. The unit just seemed to lose confidence as the year went on. Williams brings know-how, passion, variety and an attacking, turnover-creating 4-3 defense (though he'll often present different fronts). He's been a Mr. Fix-It for NFL defenses his entire career. Williams loves smart players and the Saints have two of the best in linebacker Jonathan Vilma and new safety Darren Sharper, another key acquisition. With Williams as coordinator, the Saints should climb back into the top 10 in total defense after last season's dismal 23rd ranking.

 

CSC: If you think the defense is so improved, surely it will be enough to get the Saints into the playoffs?

 DH: I do think the Saints defense will be better. Gregg Williams and a few other new faces on defense will be the difference between a team that went 8-8 a year ago to a team that should win no less than 10 games this year. I don't know if the Saints will be the best team in the NFC South, but I think they will finish ahead of Tampa and Atlanta this season. 

 

CSC: So that's how you think the NFC South will shake out?

DH: I'm picking the Panthers to win the division, the Saints to finish second, the Falcons third and the Buccaneers last.

 

CSC: We know the defense needs improvement, but will the offense maintain it's high level for another season?

DH:  I think it will, and I think a better defense will actually make the offense even better by turning the ball over and giving Drew Brees and co. more short fields to work with. The offensive line is underrated, and if Colston and Shockey are healthy, this offense can be what it was in 2008. 

 

CSC: Do you think Reggie Bush can stay healthy for the full season?

 DH: It's an unknown, really, but his history says no. When a doctor keeps cutting into the same (left) knee, it's going to take a toll. I'm sure the Saints will continue to split the load among the running backs, using Bush in space more than between the tackles, but he's going to get hit. That's the NFL.  

 

CSC: What's your take on the Saints running game? How does Mike Bell figure into it?

DH: Depending on your perspective, it is either a deep position or an unsettled one. I've looked forward to seeing what Pierre Thomas can do as the No. 1 guy, but I also have some questions. He put on eight pounds during the offseason to better handle the load, but will that slow him down, too? Some guys don't operate as well at a higher weight. We'll see how Thomas does. I see Mike Bell the same way I saw Pierre in '07 and '08: an intriguing and talented, but largely unknown running back who will be more of a third guy behind Thomas and Bush.

 

CSC: Are there any surprise players on the roster that might be primed for breakout seasons this year?

DH: I'm interested in watching cornerback Jabari Greer, who the team signed from Buffalo . He's the kind of player whose athleticism will be rewarded in Gregg Williams's system. I'd expect a couple of INTs returned for touchdowns from Greer.

 

CSC: Is Coach Sean Payton on the hot seat if the Saints finish with a mediocre record...again?

DH: I think Payton might need a winning season to save his job, after winning only 7 games in 2007 and 8 last year. A lot of expectations were raised when the Saints won 11 games in 2006. Part of the pressure on Payton has to do with all of the big-name coaches waiting to take over teams in 2010 - Mike Shanahan, Bill Cowher, Mike Holmgren, Jon Gruden. 


CSC: How does Drew Brees stack up to Peyton Manning, Tom Brady, Tony Romo etc.?

DH: I'd put Drew below Brady and Manning - those two deserve their own level - but ahead of Romo. Drew's production the last two years has been incredible, but he needs to limit his INTs and take the Saints to the Super Bowl before even being in the discussion with Brady and Manning. It doesn't mean Drew can't get there, but those two are Hall of Famers and all-time greats.

 

CSC: It seems the media loves to focus on the usual teams, New England, New York, Pittsburgh, Dallas etc. Do you think the Saints are under-appreciated by the media? If so, why?

DH: I think the Saints suffer from the geography of playing in the NFC South. New England , New York and Pittsburgh all play in larger markets of the Northeast, and Dallas is Dallas - America 's team. But I know one thing: Nothing brings attention like winning football games and playoff games, so the Saints will get plenty of pub if they win. 


CSC: How long have you worked for SI?

DH: I joined SI in 2007 after working for the New York Times for 5 years. I covered the PGA Tour for the Times in 2005-07 and the NFL from 2002-05.

 

CSC: What was your background? How did you get started? How did you wind up at SI?

DH: Growing up, I always wanted to be involved in sports - playing, writing about it, talking about it. After majoring in history at UCLA and earning a Master's degree in journalism at UC Berkeley, I worked at the Sacramento Bee, where I covered the San Francisco 49ers for three years. (I worked at the Bee with Times-Picayune Saints writer Mike Triplett, who replaced me on the 49ers beat when I took a job covering the Knicks at New York Newsday in 2000. After working at Newsday for two years, covering the Knicks and PGA Tour, the New York Times offered me a job to cover the NFL in 2002. Sports Illustrated offered me a job to cover the NFL and PGA Tour in 2007. I was flattered, humbled and jumped at the opportunity. I cover the NFL from July to Feb and golf from Feb to July.

 

CSC: Personally, which NFL team do you root for?

DH: I grew up a Raiders fan. As a kid, I had a bunch of silver and black in my room. Rooted hard for that team. As you can imagine, I don't root as hard for them anymore.

 

CSC: Which sports writers do you admire or read often?

DH: This is a long list and it will still be incomplete. I used to read the late Jim Murray at the Los Angeles Times. What a columnist! I read everyone at SI and admire the talent and skill of each one of my colleagues. It is a brilliant shop. Outside of the magazine, I read Scott Ostler, Harvey Araton, William Rhoden, Michael Wilbon, Art Spander, Sally Jenkins and a ton of other great columnists. I also like reading fiction and the odd sports book from time to time. Michael Lewis and John Feinstein are two of the best.

 

CSC: How does working for a national publication like SI differ from the local scene? 

DH: The biggest difference is that I am writing for a national audience, but you still have to report the news and know what is happening on the ground. As a former newspaper scribe, I am lucky to have a good relationship with many beat writers on teams throughout the country so I can ask them questions. It can be tough following the entire league, but I do my best to read reports in newspapers, blogs, whatever I can get my hands on! 

 

CSC: How many NFL games do you attend in a year? Will you be attending any Saints games this season? 

DH: A lot of my coverage is dictated by who is playing well or who has an interesting story to tell. At this point, I have no idea how often I will see the Saints. It could be zero, it could be five or six times. It's all a guess at this point, which makes it exciting. Since I live in New York , there is a good bet I'll see Giants, Jets, Pats, Eagles, and other teams close to me, especially if they are playing well. I don't write for the magazine every week, so I end up attending about 8 games during the regular season and then I find a postseason game a week, including the Super Bowl.

 

CSC: Has the internet and/or blogs had any effect, negative or otherwise, on SI's readership?

DH: The face of journalism is definitely changing. Thankfully, Sports Illustrated has adapted with a strong web site, si.com, that also attracts a dedicated readership. I still think our magazine is our bread and butter though. It's what made us who we are and, in my opinion, it still defines us.

 

CSC: Do you ever read blogs like those found on SB Nation?

DH: I've checked out Waggle Room on SB Nation from time to time, and I imagine I will only add more to my daily reading as time goes on. I look forward to checking out Canal Street Chronicles this season!

0 recs  |  Comment 31 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

BOOM rec'd it

Panters are looking at 3rd place in the South, depending on how badly Tampa’s season unfolds. Things change fast in the NFL.

Don't you know it's going to be all right? All right. All right.

by stujo4 on Sep 3, 2009 9:26 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

i agree, but....

All these predictions that are coming out now are outragious anyway. The thing with the Saints is they were picked to go to the Super Bowl in 07 and finished 7-9. In 08 the predictions were also that of success; 8-8. All the websites are predicting a .500 season again and i don’t blame them.

Let’s see it.

Sure, we’ve all seen them DOMINATE in preseason, and I’m pretty f***in giddy about how well they’ve played, but let’s wait until the season. I think “under the radar” is exactly where we need to be and should be.

So i guess im just suggesting not to take all the predictions to heart, cause anything can happen and until the Saints prove 2006 wasn’t a fluke, i think a .500 prediction isn’t overly insulting.

by Jimmmie on Sep 3, 2009 8:11 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

I agree

Most professionals who do predictions will look at the facts. Those facts in this case come from recent history. The last two years, the Saints looked great on paper. Those years turned out a sub-par record and par record the following year. It was easy for these professionals to give the Saints credit though at the start of those two years due to the 06 season. Now after two disappointing seasons that followed, this year that credit is gone regardless of the excellent upgrades and changes made in the off season. Once again they look great on paper but not to many professionals are willing to get caught up in that trick bag again. I know it’s easy for all of us to get excited about our Saints this year and their chances because we are personally involved; we love our team. But if we all looked at it from an objective stand point, we might not be so optimistic from the get go do to “recent history”. Again, I like a lot of you am loving the fact that we are so underrated. The players know this to and I can only hope that it causes a team wide attitude and they play week in and week out with a chip on their shoulders because of it. With the talent on this team, great fans like us who support our boys, and the media’s lack of respect, I truly believe this will be one season to remember for a long time to come. Lets get to it Saints, prove the rest of the world wrong and gain the respect that you deserve.

by narco301 on Sep 3, 2009 8:50 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

+1

Seems like a reasonable prediction to me. Maybe the important part of the story is that the media is back to predicting the Saints will have an average year and miss the playoffs. As they are all wrong so often, this probably bodes well for us. Better than getting picked for the Superbowl, anyway.

“Under the radar” is where the Saints live. Kinda like trolls and bridges. They’re comfortable there. They’ve only been more than a blip on the national radar once in 42 years of play, and that led to two years of huge predictions and very Saintly production. Under the radar could be like a homefield advantage for New Orleans.

by FuSoYa on Sep 3, 2009 9:01 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah, true... but... :)

Oh I don’t have any problem with us “flying under the radar”. I’m not emotionally reacting to the lack of love for the Saints. I really think we will win the division but I know why Atlanta is considered “sexy” even if I think they are idiots for thinking that. But what I don’t understand is how people can be that stupid as to think Carolina will win the division.

1) They have never had back-to-back winning seasons. Granted they don’t have a huge history of it either, but they have enough evidence to point to an average team winning the easy years and losing the hard years. The odds that they do not continue this trend this year are literally astronomical
2) They have a brutal schedule this year, not just hard but flat out brutal. Granted so do we, but so do the Falcons and Tampa as well. AFC-E and NFC-E and our own division? Sure some of those teams last year also had inflated records because of their opposition, but it still means something.
3) They are riddled with injuries right now, including some critically damaging season-ending ones. They are changing schemes to a “bend but don’t break” style which we all know just how stupid that scheme is. Their defense was already not so great, I mean they almost gave Detroit a win last year… and they’re supposed to stop NE, Dallas, the Beagles, NY (both), the Saints and the Falcons? Not happening.
4) Do I really need to go on? Well just for kicks, lets throw in offensive woes too. Their OL is a bit shaky due to injury right now. Their backfield is missing half its “dynamic duo”. Their QB situation is at least questionable. Their WR crew is OK I suppose, you can’t call any crew with Steve Smith bad at any rate, but they aren’t exactly awesome either.

I really hope its Saints → Falcons → Carolina → TB, but I could just as easily see Falcons → Saints → TB → Carolina. Or even Saints →TB → Falcons → Carolina (The falcons D is also a joke right about right now). But to put Carolina up top is sheer insanity. They have (and I’m being generous) about a 10% chance of winning the division this year, and if they do it will be solely due to injuries or incompetence on the coaching staffs in Atlanta and NO.

by FriarBob on Sep 3, 2009 8:59 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

“2) They have a brutal schedule this year, not just hard but flat out brutal. Granted so do we, but so do the Falcons and Tampa as well. AFC-E and NFC-E and our own division? Sure some of those teams last year also had inflated records because of their opposition, but it still means something.”

If all four teams in the division have brutal schedules, I’m trying to understand how this qualifies as a point of contention against Carolina coming out on top. While a valid observation, it seems completely irrelevant to the point you’re attempting to make.

Also, just about everything else you mentioned — outside of Jonathan Stewart’s minor foot boo-boo and a change in defensive schemes — could be applied to last year’s 12-4 division-winning season, as well. A “bend but don’t break” defense (as you call it) didn’t work in New Orleans, because our defensive talent is mediocre at best. I don’t think it’s a stretch to say that Carolina has had better overall defensive talent than the Saints since their inaugural season. They also weren’t exactly running an all-out attacking defense last year.

I just don’t see THAT much digression on their part this year. I think they’re just as much in the mix for the division title as the Saints and Falcons are.

Rough odds for winning the NFC South, imo:

Atlanta – 35%
New Orleans – 33%
Carolina – 30%
Tampa Bay – 2%

"It feels like a tiny prick " -Reggie Bush

by coldpizza on Sep 3, 2009 9:39 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Rough odds for winning the NFC South

New Orleans: 100%
Atlanta: 0%
Carolina: 0%
Tampa: -33%

Seriously: Atlanta? Are you on the Matt Ryan bandwagon now?

"Tell all the killjoys to pound sand." -- Ralph Malbrough

by MtnExile on Sep 3, 2009 10:48 AM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

Nice full-swing optimism

But the NFC South has been a tough and competitive division. Whatever the preseason calamities, it’s not going to magically devolve into the NFC West in one year. Carolina is having a tough time getting out of the gate this year, and Atlanta’s pass defense looks like N.O.‘s, but they haven’t played a game for points yet. I’m reserving judgment for Carolina based solely on their ability to cobble together success in past years. Atlanta is a tough and balanced team still. Tampa looks like a sad joke, but you never know. And most important, New Orleans has to come out guns blazing before I’m personally ready to say they’ve got a shot at it. They look better than the rest of the division(and most of the NFL) now, but they’re 0-0 so far. If we get to week 5 with a 2 game lead in the division, I’ll be dining on cheese and kool-aid, or whatever. But these bastards have been too good at winding me up and creatively letting me down to snag me with a raider spanking in the preseason.

by FuSoYa on Sep 3, 2009 11:15 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yes!

Could not have put it better myself!!!

by Jimmmie on Sep 3, 2009 1:22 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Well don’t worry, even if he is I’ll keep you company among the doubters. :)

by FriarBob on Sep 3, 2009 11:15 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I’m on the “balanced offense is paramount” bandwagon.

"It feels like a tiny prick " -Reggie Bush

by coldpizza on Sep 3, 2009 12:17 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

If all four teams in the division have brutal schedules, I’m trying to understand how this qualifies as a point of contention against Carolina coming out on top. While a valid observation, it seems completely irrelevant to the point you’re attempting to make.

Yeah should have been a bit more clear. The other teams have brutal schedules too, but they have the most brutal one. Make sense now?

A "bend but don’t break" defense (as you call it) didn’t work in New Orleans, because our defensive talent is mediocre at best. I don’t think it’s a stretch to say that Carolina has had better overall defensive talent than the Saints since their inaugural season. They also weren’t exactly running an all-out attacking defense last year.

True, but they were at least doing some sort of attacking, and they had weaker teams to attack. This year they have a huge hole at DT they can’t truly fill (patch maybe, fill no) and they have a lot of teams to face with good running games. That is going to hurt.

I just don’t see THAT much digression on their part this year.

Guess we’ll have to disagree then.

But really the correct numbers are probably more like this:
NO – 42%
ATL – 38%
TB – 12%
CAR – 8%

by FriarBob on Sep 3, 2009 11:14 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Another Off Coordinator fired

Tampa Bay just fired offensive coordinator Jagodzinski. That’s one less team (2 wins) to worry about.

by WhoDat_OH on Sep 3, 2009 9:44 AM CDT via mobile reply actions   0 recs

let me jump in here

rotoworld.com:

Bucs fired offensive coordinator Jeff Jagodzinski.
This is a stunner. Jags was hired in January to install a vertical-strike West Coast attack and zone blocking on the offensive line. He’ll be replaced by QBs coach Greg Olson, who failed to develop Joey Harrington in Detroit before flaming out as Rams offensive coordinator in 2006. We suspect Jagodzinski wasn’t on board with Byron Leftwich, but this raises a lot of questions about the direction and strategy of the Tampa offense. Not a good sign.

That’s a shame.

Don't you know it's going to be all right? All right. All right.

by stujo4 on Sep 3, 2009 9:48 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

comment from Buc 'em
And I had such high hopes
for where the offense might go this season…
wow
There must have been a big disagreement over the QB decision…that or the Glazers just wanted to save more money.
Damn….
by pasadenapadre on Sep 3, 2009 9:42 AM CDT

WHAT??
Um…. what offense?
Wow. Kind of sad. I’ll be sad after I get up off the floor, from rolling, ass-less. Buc ’em!

Don't you know it's going to be all right? All right. All right.

by stujo4 on Sep 3, 2009 9:52 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Rotoworld.com:

The Bucs questioned Jeff Jagodzinski’s play calling abilities and believed he might be more qualifiied as a head coach, rather than a play-caller.
We wonder if the Bucs offensive scheme will now change, as it was believed they would be a run-heavy style offense. We will see how Greg Olson calls the preseason finale on Friday against the Texans.
Source: St. Petersburg Times

“Hey, who’s calling the plays?” “I thought you were.” “Hey, I’m head coach material, I don’t call plays. Who’s the OC again?” “You mean the QB coach? I am.” ‘No the Offensive Coordinator! He should be calling the plays! What’s that guy’s name?" “Coach, phone call…”

Don't you know it's going to be all right? All right. All right.

by stujo4 on Sep 3, 2009 2:11 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

this was all Raheem Morris' fault.... Excellent!!!
Jeff Jagodzinski is no longer the Bucs offensive coordinator for a simple reason: he wasn’t ready for the job. “Jags” had very little experience calling plays, Sometime during training camp, it became increasingly apparent to Bucs officials and players, that Jagodzinski was not equipped to install and direct an NFL offense,
Hiring Jagodzinski was one of the first big decisions Morris made as a head coach, and it couldn’t have turned out much worse. Greg Olson, now the team’s coordinator, wanted the job back in January, but the team didn’t even interview him. PFT

Seriously, how can you win in the NFC South if you are this unorganized, and dare I say, incompetent? Coach Morris may not last the season. They thought he was another Mike Tomlin. Not quite. I’m having a great day here!

Don't you know it's going to be all right? All right. All right.

by stujo4 on Sep 3, 2009 3:32 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

comments from Buc 'em!!!!
The way the Bucs are being run is on par with how awful the Chiefs and Raiders have been. This is an Al Davis move. Its embarrassing.
by jacksontsmith on Sep 3, 2009 11:30 AM CDT
Jags is gone………but whatever the case may be we are still not going to win more than 4 games. Evaluation season is upon us and they need to find the holes and fill them in. Hopefully next off season will be more productive.
by buccanator on Sep 3, 2009
This kind of stuff is a bloggers dream though…right?
by McBuc on Sep 3, 2009 3:13 PM

I don’t know about bloggers, but I’m pretty….. happy.

Don't you know it's going to be all right? All right. All right.

by stujo4 on Sep 3, 2009 3:40 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

It just keeps getting better!

rotoworld.com:

In a Thursday radio interview, Matt Bryant bashed fellow Bucs K Mike Nugent and suggested coach Raheem Morris and [first year] GM Mark Dominik have been undercutting him.
Bryant made it clear that his competition with Nugent is not a friendly one, boasting that he would take Nugent “behind the woodshed” if he was healthy this preseason. “It’s not necessarily going to be Nugent,” Bryant said of the Bucs choice at kicker. “You’ve seen the preseason?” The outburst isn’t going to endear him to the front office.

Don't you know it's going to be all right? All right. All right.

by stujo4 on Sep 3, 2009 4:23 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

This franchise meltdown is even better than Denver’s. Man I’m having a good day.

Don't you know it's going to be all right? All right. All right.

by stujo4 on Sep 3, 2009 4:23 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

haha!!

Thanks for keeping us all in the loop.

Wanna say something? Sign up! It's free!

by Saintsational on Sep 3, 2009 5:03 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I really needed this.

I was kind of holding on to “Remember that a fresh start isn’t always a bad one”

HAHAHAHAHAHAHA. I just set that one free like a little birdie at an ozzy concert.

Besmirching the reverence of the sport of customer service since Aug 26, 2009

by asaint on Sep 3, 2009 5:29 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Raheem Morris and Josh McDaniels

ought to get together with Terrell Owens and Michael Irvin to do some kind of reality gameshow. All these manic-depressive shifts, lark personnel transactions, and desperately feigned competence makes for such high drama. It would fit nicely in FX’s Fall lineup, right before that weird basketball game with the trampolines.

by FuSoYa on Sep 3, 2009 10:13 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

you are forgetting Brandon Marshall

and Amy Winehouse

Being a Saints fan will take years off your life

by MobileSaint on Sep 3, 2009 10:48 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

good read

I will say that he’s going out on a limb for picking Carolina but they could do it. That’s why we play on Sundays. Anyways, i’ll give my percentages for each team winning since most everyone else has.

Saints-38%
Atlanta-32%
Carolina-23%
TB-7%

Those are what I feel are fair and reasonable percentages.

Superbowl bound!!!...I hope? Go Saints! :D

by skinnykinney on Sep 3, 2009 1:23 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

i think

TB-25%
ATL-25%
CAR-25%
Saints25%
any thing can happen!

by r c a on Sep 3, 2009 2:16 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Bucs - 0% Me 25%

Besmirching the reverence of the sport of customer service since Aug 26, 2009

by asaint on Sep 3, 2009 5:28 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

90% of the time

it works every time

Wanna say something? Sign up! It's free!

by Saintsational on Sep 4, 2009 12:16 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I wonder why this guy changed his tune.

Saintsational says he picked us third in the magazine and now says second on the phone? What changed his mind, SS? Why didn’t you call him on the carpet for that? Did you intimidate him into buttering you up or is it the other way around?

The fact is, we got something that nobody in our division has and that is depth at every important position. Preseason or not, when you are able to pull your starters in half the time you intended to, when the other team’s first unit is still on the field trying to get past your 2nd and 3rd string defense, when you’ve got 75 guys you’d like to keep, it bodes well. Very well. Did anyone pick Delhomme in their FFL draft? Matt Ryan or Leftwich? We got 12 teams in our league and no one in the NFCS got picked except our boy. Rather than look at nebulous percentages, let’s do some real matchup stuff.

v. Panthers – stop DeAngelo OR Smith, game over
v. Falcons – keep Ryan and Co. off the field w/ long drives, game over
v. Bucs – keep breathing, game over.

I wouldn’t be surprised at all if the Saints sweep the entire division. Let’s not forget, we have the best play-caller and a lot of hot, young talent that is hungry for respect. All we have to do is go out there and execute.

If we could just sythesize life in a laboratory, we could prove that the creation of life requires no intelligence.

by Tigernut on Sep 3, 2009 6:22 PM CDT reply actions   1 recs

A couple of things don't make sense
and if Colston and Shockey are healthy, this offense can be what it was in 2008.

Wouldn’t the O be better than last year, considering that Colston and Shockey were injured most of that year?

SI is almost as bad as ESPN. Peter King picked the Saints to finish 8-8 because their D is lacking. Well Mr. Coffee, the Saints were 8-8 LAST year with that lousy defense that has been upgraded considerably since then.

Just say NO to all of these predictions. They don’t know anymore than any of us. Probably less.

by SaintsB on Sep 4, 2009 6:39 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

The ultimate community for lovers of all things Black and Gold! The latest news, commentary, discussion, linkage and more! Join in the conversation now with all of your fellow Who Dats!
Start posting about the Saints »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

7d35_1_small
New Orleans Saints Player Pick 'Em Contest - Week 12 vs Patriots
Medium_reggie-bush_small
How to be a Fan of a Winning Team for Dummies
Bea_arthur_small
Christ, please make it stop.
Voodoo_mask_small
Da Gris Gris Man's Spell on Tampa Bay Buccaneers
Avatar_small
Down with all the haters!

Recent FanPosts

Pppp_small
tickets...
Thefalcoholic_small
The Falcoholic Requests A Scouting Report
Dscn0098_small
HOW GOOD ARE MY SAINTS ?????????
Pppp_small
Way too much coffee and enthusiasm... and time
000271_small
Everyone seems a little more at ease......
Pppp_small
Can we adopt....
Small
Feel the Brees but not........
Harley_saints_small
A closer Confrence look...
910_small
VIEW FROM SAINTS FAN in PANTHER COUNTRY

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Latest NFL Headlines from SB Nation

Featured Poll

Poll
Do you want the Saints to lose at least one game?

  380 votes | Results

Forecast Radio

Listen to Ralph, Kevin and myself talk about all things Saints every week. 

We're on Twitter!

Click here to start following Da Chronic! Tweet, tweet!

Twitter-logo_medium


Head Coach

Bensonshock_small Saintsational

Offensive Coordinator (Contributor)

Avatar_small MtnExile

Small Hap Glaudi's Ghost

Images_small saints-nation