Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Leandro Damiao Is Still Really Good

Arizona Cardinals @ New Orleans Saints - Shootout Expected

When the Arizona Cardinals come visit the New Orleans Saints (kickoff is Saturday at 3:30pm Central, 4:30 Eastern on FOX) at the Superdome, points should come in bunches. If the Packers @ Cardinals matchup last week was any indication of what two very capable offenses with struggling defense can do to each other, I'm thinking we'll see more of the same in a dome with impeccable conditions.

Cardinals vs Saints preview

Cardinals vs Saints coverage

Star-divide

Here's a few factors to consider when you get into shootout games like these:

-- Turnovers and sacks come at a premium. They do in all games, but a one turnover difference can swing the game when both offenses are gaining yards in bunches. Any big defensive "play" can prove to be a game changer.

-- 3rd down plays are crucial. When teams are moving the ball seemingly at will, you have to take advantage of your opportunities to get off the field as a defense because they won't come that often. If you're facing a 3rd and 4 or more, that is your chance to get a stop and you're in desperate need to make that play.

-- Penalties are a major factor. When offenses are operating at a very high efficiency rate, the easiest way to stop them is when they need 15-20 yards to get a first down, instead of 10. Conversely, helping them out by handing them 15 yards on a personal foul when they're already moving the ball on you is a back breaker.

-- Stopping opposing offenses to field goal attempts is basically a win. If the field goal is missed, even better.

Those are my four items to watch, and while you can say those factors apply to any football game, I'd venture to say they are more pronounced in a shootout. So how do the Saints and the Cardinals stack up in these categories?


Turnovers and sacks:

Turnover Differential: Saints 3rd in NFL (+11), Cardinals 24th in NFL (-7)

Sacks Made: Cardinals 6th most in NFL (43), Saints 13th most in NFL (35)

Sacks Allowed: Saints 4th least in NFL (20), Cardinals 6th least in NFL (26)

 

3rd Down Conversions:

When on Offense: Saints 6th in NFL (45% conversion), Cardinals 21st in NFL (36%)

When on Defense: Saints 19th in the NFL (38% conversion), Cardinals 27th in NFL (35%)

 

Penalties:

On Offense: Saints 13th least penalized (89), Cardinals 26th least penalized (108)

On Defense: Saints 7th least penalized (86), Cardinals 23rd least penalized (104)

 

Field Goal %:

Cardinals 1st in NFL (95%), Saints 24th in NFL (79%)

 

So all in all, if this game turns out to be an offensive fanfare/shootout like I expect it to, the Saints match up favorably in all of the categories I listed as crucial except for field goal percentage. The sack category is basically a push, because while the Saints recorded 8 less sacks this season, they also gave up 6 less than the Cardinals. The major differences you can see in what happened to both teams over the course of the season are that the Saints offense and defense both converted 3rd down opportunities at a much better rate than the Cardinals. The Saints also have a much better turnover ratio for the season, and the Saints get an infinitely smaller number of penalties per game. This all adds up to what I consider a big advantage for the Saints, should this game get into a shootout. Big plays, to an extent, involve bigger risks. When both teams are taking big risks, the one with more penalties, turnovers, and lower 3rd down % conversion rate tend to lose. On paper, the Saints have to be a pretty big favorite, especially considering the fact that this game is at home. But we've all seen what Kurt Warner has done the last two years in the playoffs, and there is a reason the game is being played. The Achilles heel for the Saints, I think, would be a crucial late Garrett Hartley field goal should the Saints come to need it. Season stats are out the window when the opening kickoff is hit, but ultimately, the team that does better in these areas I've outlined will win. History says the Saints are better in those areas than the Cardinals. We shall see if history can repeat itself at 3:30pm Central on Saturday.

Seeing the statistics I put together above, do you feel better, worse or indifferent about the Saints-Cards matchup?

Comment 25 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I think the Gerald Hayes injury is a big factor

he either plays injured or they replace him. If someone replaces him, unless I am interpreting things incorrectly, they would be an inexperienced linebacker and we have a tough offense for that to be successful for the Cardinals.

"I think we agree, the past is over" - George W Bush
"The greatest enemy of knowlege is not ignorance; it is the illusion of knowledge" Stephen Hawking

by Philinwood on Jan 15, 2010 7:19 AM CST reply actions  

I respect Warner and the Cards offense immensly

But I believe with healthy corners and linebackers for the first time in a while Greg Williams will get back to planning good aggresive defensive scheme
Remember in our 3 loses the defense was only giving up points in the low to mid 20’s still it was our offense struggling
The way I see it the score will be in the area of Saints 35 Cards24
Geaux Saints

by mississippisaintsfan on Jan 15, 2010 7:46 AM CST reply actions  

agreed

Saints D will re-establish themselves. Sharper will get a pick and we’ll get to Warner a lot!!

Don't worry I got your back cuz...

by TAYDIGGA on Jan 15, 2010 3:09 PM CST up reply actions  

I like the Saints chances

I think the numbers are nice, but we see every year that in the playoffs, a lot of that stuff gets thrown out. The penalties against the Cardinal offense will be big…forcing 3rd and longs in these types of games as you pointed out are huge. The 12th man can help here.

I’m not too worried about Garret Hartley…he’s young and his got the skill set. Even the greats miss some kicks…we saw Robbie Gould who is about as money as they get miss a game winner against the Vikings.

The thing I most anxious to see is the Defense. How will they hold up? Can they replicate their early season success? Can they flip the switch; much like the Cardinals did last year?

by mainesaint on Jan 15, 2010 7:48 AM CST reply actions  

Saints Advantage

I think the Saints have the advantage, especially in the Dome. This could be a nail bitter, though. If it’s tied with 2 minutes left in the 4th quarter, try below:
The Saints-O-Maker
1 part Tums
1 part alka-seltzer
1 part Crown Royal
All dropped in a frosty mug of Beer

Is it Saturday yet???

by Ponysaints on Jan 15, 2010 7:57 AM CST reply actions  

I’ll take either so long as we win! :)

by FriarBob on Jan 15, 2010 11:04 AM CST up reply actions  

I've got a feeling it will be one extreme or the other..

Either a “comparatively” low scoring, hard fought battle OR the Saints lay a 40 burger on them and win large. For whatever reasons, I’m not envisioning a shootout where both teams score in the thirty’s or higher. Probably because that’s what so many talking heads are predicting and, as we all know, they’re more often wrong than right.

by Drew-Dat on Jan 15, 2010 2:37 PM CST up reply actions  

It's the run game

on both sides of the ball that will be the difference. We all know what Breese and Warner can do, the team that runs better and stops the run better will win. I see a lower scoring game, Saints 24 Cards 21.

Bear

by bearsaint on Jan 15, 2010 9:17 AM CST reply actions  

key factors

Basically stats don’t mean anything in the playoffs. It comes down to basic fundamentals. The team that has the least amount of penaltiesand turnovers, and the team that is able to move the football and control the clock usually comes out the victor. I predict the score to be 31-21 Saints.

by believerofgoldandblack on Jan 15, 2010 10:03 AM CST reply actions  

I'd like to bring up some playoff Deja Vu

We all know that Warner with the Rams got beat by the Saints in 2000…

But let’s look at 2006.

In 2005, the Eagles (NFC candidate) lost the Superbowl. The next year, they lost to the Saints after the bye at the Dome in the divisional playoffs. Saints win.

It is 2010. The Cardinals (NFC candidate who lost last year’s bowl) have to face the Saints at the dome after the bye.

Do I smell another Saints win?

by Jee on Jan 15, 2010 11:00 AM CST via mobile reply actions  

Here's an even better bit of playoff trivia from the Houston Chronicle:

“Since the NFL implemented the 12-team postseason format for the 1990 season, top-seeded teams in the NFC are 17 – 2 in the divisional round. That means the Saints have an 89.5 percent chance of defeating Arizona.”

by Drew-Dat on Jan 15, 2010 2:17 PM CST up reply actions  

NICE...

They don’t quote that one on ESPN/et al.

Saints fan in DFW. Saints go all the way... I BELIEVE!

by Dan Kelly on Jan 15, 2010 2:31 PM CST up reply actions  

Really? They have a 89.5 percent chance of defeating Arizona? No, thanks for trying, but that’s a awful interpretation. What that means is that the top seeded teams in the NFC have won 89.5 percent of the 19 matches played since 1990.

by edbro on Jan 15, 2010 5:34 PM CST up reply actions  

I just realized that you quoted that from the Houston Chronicle. Just to clear it up, I didn’t mean that as an attack against you.

by edbro on Jan 15, 2010 5:35 PM CST up reply actions  

I knew that statement was inaccurate when I quoted it, but

John McClain, sports writer for the Houston Chronicle issued a retraction/correction in the Sunday edition of the paper. Stated he meant to say, “That means the Saints have a 100% chance of defeating Arizona.” It’s nice to see a sports writer admit when he makes a mistake.

by Drew-Dat on Jan 17, 2010 5:34 PM CST up reply actions  

If you all the mixed media Saints hate is heavy now...

Wait’ll next week when we rematch with the ’Boys.

Honestly I can’t stand reading sites and papers preaching momentum and that’s why we’ll lose. These morons don’t know how healthy and prepared we are. The D will play a huge role in this game.

Saints 38 Cards 20

by Jee on Jan 15, 2010 11:03 AM CST via mobile reply actions  

If it's not media hype about the Cowboys, it'll be the same about Favre.

It will be a long week of media BS regardless of who wins on Sunday.

by Drew-Dat on Jan 15, 2010 2:20 PM CST reply actions  

The thing about a shootout is - the guys with the most ammo win!

Ok, Saints. Lock and load!!!!!!!!

FIRE!

Fat, dumb, and happy. Hell, two out of three ain't bad!

I Want To Die In My Sleep Like My Grandpa – Not Screaming and Yelling Like His Passengers.

by Just 'Nother Day on Jan 15, 2010 5:21 PM CST reply actions  

please, these stats tell us very little

the must important factor that the saints need to consider (and that the author of this post totally failed to) is that at the end of the game, when the clock reads 0:00, its is absolutely critical, i would venture to say even most pronounced, that the saints have more points scored than the cardinals. only when they have managed to accomplish this often over looked statistic will the saints be able to prove themselves as the better team.

sorry saints-nation (if that even is your real name), you can do all the fancy stats juking you want, but we all know what the black and gold should REALLY be focused on. as winston churchill once said, there are 3 kinds of statistics. lies, damned lies, and god damn lies. maybe you should remember that next time you do one of your “ANALysis”.

HELLO HELLO MR WILPON... BUY THAT MANSION. WE DONT NEED A CONDO.

by kendynamo on Jan 15, 2010 9:50 PM CST reply actions  

who is this guy?

why all the vitriole?

Why not us? Why not Deuce?

by Hans Petersen on Jan 15, 2010 11:18 PM CST up reply actions  

Don't know but I think he typed this will making one of those "1-900" phone calls, if you know what I mean.

Hey, kendynamo. We at the CSC would love to match wits with you but, we don’t attack unarmed men.

Go play with your brother, Sponge Bob!

Fat, dumb, and happy. Hell, two out of three ain't bad!

I Want To Die In My Sleep Like My Grandpa – Not Screaming and Yelling Like His Passengers.

by Just 'Nother Day on Jan 16, 2010 6:10 AM CST up reply actions  

what are do you mean? i have two arms

i dont get it. does sponge bob’s brother have no arms?

HELLO HELLO MR WILPON... BUY THAT MANSION. WE DONT NEED A CONDO.

by kendynamo on Jan 16, 2010 1:39 PM CST up reply actions  

a better question is

why doesn’t saints-nation man up and respond to my questions, rather than sick his attack dogs on me? it appears he lacks as much courage as I posses vitriole.

HELLO HELLO MR WILPON... BUY THAT MANSION. WE DONT NEED A CONDO.

by kendynamo on Jan 16, 2010 1:41 PM CST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

The ultimate community for lovers of all things Black and Gold! The latest news, commentary, discussion, linkage and more! Join in the conversation now with all of your fellow Who Dats!

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

1311373128_guildwars2commando_697440_small
CSC Lagniappe: #13 Alltime Saints

Recent FanPosts

014_small
Would you like to see the Saints sign Albert Haynesworth?
Colts-saints-2_small
Has anyone ever done the Punt, Pass and Kick competition
Small
Saints showing disrespect towards Drew Brees
Images_small
Hosting the Super Bowl
Small
Understanding our broken psyche (or "Why does it still hurt?")
Small
12 men on the field strategy?
Evil_bunny_small
Statistical Breakdown of WR Usage
271015_10150225174105754_682505753_7748609_5242564_n_1__small
My thoughts on the offseason
Angry_birds_small
About Robert Meachem

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Featured Poll

Poll
Which Saints regular season was better: 2009 or 2011?
2009
402 votes
2011
446 votes

848 votes | Poll has closed

Twitter-logo_medium


Head Coach

Erindavewhodat_small Dave Cariello

Assistant Coach (Editor/Contributor)

0113wbphillips_small Hans Petersen

Saintslogo_small Andrew Juge

Offensive Coordinators (Contributors)

13088_f520_small David "Satch" Kelly

Top_small Alex Swift

L_f46d02fdda5fad668929c4424cb0d2dc_small Preston J. Gary, Jr.

100media36imag0036_small Travis Dauro