Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Ray Allen Fighting Age, Injury And His New Role

Open the Damn Dome!

You may remember a couple of weeks ago I put up a poll asking whether readers would prefer to be in Miami or New Orleans should the Saints make the Super Bowl. The question popped into my head before the playoffs even started when my wife asked me what I would do if the situation actually came up. Days later, it was on your computer screen. It took a while but the Times-Pic eventually caught on as well.

Naturally, it was a difficult choice I was hoping I would just have to make. Would I rather be at the game to watch this once-in-a-lifetime experience in person and add to my impressive streak of Saints game attendance or would it be best to stay here in New Orleans where I could celebrate with all of my friends, family and fellow Who Dats? Ultimately, I decided I would want to go to Miami. But there was one possible situation that would have definitely made me re-think decision: Open the Superdome and let fans watch it there. I couldn't imagine a better way to watch the Saints play the biggest game of their 43-year history than in the stadium I've watched countless others.

Star-divide

Seems like a win-win situation to me. Seats could be offered to season ticket holders first, allowing them to sit in the same seats from which they've watched this entire magical season unfold and be surrounded by the same fans with whom they've celebrated all year. Any tickets held by fans not wishing to take advantage of the opportunity could then be purchased by non-season ticket holding fans. And I don't see any reason why Tom Benson and co. wouldn't be interested in adding another event, allowing them yet another opportunity to sell more tickets and concessions. 

I'm not the only one who thinks this would be a great idea, by the way. There are over 8,000 fans of the "Open the Louisiana Superdome for SuperBowl XLIV" Facebook fan page, all of whom want to see it happen.

But to my disappointment, I learned yesterday that we're all out of luck. Apparently, to host such an event would be to break an old NFL rule...

"Yeah, we've had a lot of calls, and certainly wish we could show it, but there is a long standing NFL policy that you cannot show the game to a mass audience, so we're just not able to do it. Sorry, wish we could,"    

What? Pretty lame answer. It's like a kid asking their parent for a reason why they can't do something and getting the response, "Because." Am I missing something? Seriously. I'm willing to bet the decision is motivated by money, but I just can't figure out how.  

First of all, what makes up a mass audience? Can we have a number please? The Prytania Theatre and World War II museum both held screenings of the NFC Championship game and haven't been charged with violating any rules to the best of my knowledge. So how many is too many? Nearly every resident of the city of New Orleans will be watching this game, just as they did the NFC Championship, so what the hell does it matter how they watch it? 

And just because a policy is long standing, doesn't make it a good rule. I will spare you the list of amendments and law changes that we've made in our country in an effort to adapt with the times but if America were as stringent as the NFL, women still wouldn't be allowed to vote and morons would still be allowed to talk and text on their cell phones while they drive. 

I know it may be too late and the plea's from those of us who want this to happen may be falling on deaf ears, but I know this is done in other stadiums in other sports. So to Goodell and the NFL (No Fun League): Take the stick out of your butt and let us open the damn Superdome! Successful organizations and businesses learn to adapt to survive. Will the NFL?

Comment 76 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Amen to that brotha....

This would be a blessing to many of the die hard, loyal fans who simply can not afford a trip to Miami. I would jump all over it. Screw the NFL. They suck.

by jack_casse on Jan 27, 2010 2:42 PM CST reply actions  

i remember a long time ago

watching footage from a team watching a road playoff game from thier home stadium. i dont remember who it was (im thinking either the redskins or minn), but it was at least 15 years ago. i mainly remember it because it thought it was such a good idea at the time. i myself plan on going to miami, but im pretty sure that if i were staying that i would not want to watch the game in the superdome. tvs are amazing these days, so i would rather watch it in a smaller group where the beer and food are supermarket prices not stadium prices. but it would be a great way for everyone to go insane together.

Jabari Greer on Tracy Porter's INT off Favre late in the 4th: "That lucky bastard. Man, he's going to get in history."

by DrewBreesManCrush on Jan 27, 2010 2:58 PM CST reply actions  

yeah

it certainly wouldn’t be about the quality of the screens. It’s about the feeling of togetherness that our small city is based on. Maybe I should add that sentence to my post.

Wanna say something? Sign up! It's free!

by Dave Cariello on Jan 27, 2010 3:00 PM CST up reply actions  

I remember a story about Dallas

earlier this season, in the new Stadium, the Cowboys were on a 3pm game, and there was an important game on at noon, but they were not allowed to broadcast the game on the big screen above the field.

If you pay for a ticket to an NFL event, they don’t even have the rights to a different NFL event.
It’s almost like the NFL is telling us, “Just stay home and watch it at home for free.”

I am with ya, why hasn’t this been addressed yet?!? Bars holding 100 people are okay, theatres holding a few hundred are okay… so why isn’t a bigger venue okay? It’s not like it’s blacked out locally!

by Baggs5 on Jan 27, 2010 3:07 PM CST reply actions  

Bars (and probably the Prytania) are definately not OK by NFL rules

just be glad they don’t start cracking down on it.

I love this dome idea, would even buy a ticket for it, if it wasn’t ridiculous.

WHODAT WHODAT WHODAT

by CoachOfEarl on Jan 27, 2010 9:55 PM CST up reply actions  

I voted New Orleans in that poll

…because I thought you meant, “where would you like to see the game played.” Like, duh.

We discussed this some months back…maybe before the start of the season. It’s a no-brainer. And the thing is, they don’t even have to show it on the Dome video…people would gladly go there and watch it on their iPhones for the chance to be with 70,000 other screaming WhoDats.

But the NFL really needs to change that policy. What could the reasoning behind it possibly be?

BURN THE BLACK PANTS!!!!

by MtnExile on Jan 27, 2010 3:18 PM CST reply actions  

I've tried to come up with one for the last day

obviously it’s got to be money related. I just can’t figure out how.

Wanna say something? Sign up! It's free!

by Dave Cariello on Jan 27, 2010 3:19 PM CST up reply actions  

The TP article explains how. TV ratings. The TV stations lose advertising revenue if less TV sets are turned on for the game.

There is, of course, a incredibly simple fix. So simple that it will never happen. Just require as part of the purchase agreement for the ticket that the user turns their TV on to the game channel before they leave. Most people will gladly oblige, they’re already spending what 200+ for the tickets in the first place, whats an extra $5 on their electric bill?

Alternately, work with Nielsen to get the numbers attending at the dome added to the TV sets in use in some “family unit” ratio or something. Say for every 2.5 attendees one more TV is considered to have been tuned in. It’s not like that would be impossible to do.

But it won’t happen. Not anytime soon at least. Definitely not in time for this game. Probably not even in time for the 2030 super bowl.

by FriarBob on Jan 27, 2010 3:41 PM CST up reply actions  

Hmm OK my bad I thought there was a TP article on it but now I can’t find it.

At any rate, this same thing came up in 2006 with Indy round 1. The ratings are the reason. That’s also why there was almost a HUGE black eye for the NFL when they tried to muscle churches into not showing the game to people who wanted to attend. That backfired and they quietly allowed it after all.

by FriarBob on Jan 27, 2010 3:45 PM CST up reply actions  

What about the hundreds of fans coming to NOLA to watch the game?

Do they count these people in the ratings?Hotels that don’t normally book up for the week before Mardi Gras are full.These are Saints fans coming to town.This party is (in my opinion) just as big as Mardi Gras.Would’nt it be nice for these fans, that don’t normally get a chance,to be able to get to feel the excitment of the Dome for a really special event?Change the friggin rules.It would be really nice for the city and the No Fun Leauge to do somethig for the fans.

I'll be your huckleberry- Doc Holliday to Ringo

by KilnBill on Jan 27, 2010 3:57 PM CST up reply actions  

If I could get a ticket I'd be there.

I’m trying to decide if I want to road trip it to NOLA or Miami for the big day. If I could get a seat in the superdome I’d for sure go there. There’s a lot of fans here in Atlanta that would do the same. We love the New Orleans and the Saints and want to get as close as we can to the excitement. I’d probably prefer to watch the game in the dome w/ the Who Dat Nation than be there live w/ the corperate suits that get to go to the superbowl. It’d be close, but that afterparty on Bourbon Street would seal the deal.

by saintsdevotee on Jan 27, 2010 7:54 PM CST up reply actions  

I see what you mean

But I’ve been thinking about it and da Dome holds 70,000. And the tv ratings have what, millions watching a football game? With the small percentage of viewers lost, they will make up that money from tickets sold or close to it.

by ReggieVilma on Jan 30, 2010 5:52 PM CST up reply actions  

ive seen

college basketball games aired in stadiums, why not our saints

"if you know what life is worth, you will look for yours on earth" Bob Marley

by sernycrusher on Jan 27, 2010 3:36 PM CST reply actions  

Really?

I thought the key-chain rattling idea was ridiculous, so maybe I’m just out of touch. In no particular order here are more concerns:

We want as many passionate fans IN MIAMI as possible. Seems crazy to suggest people go inside and watch the game on teevee vs. going to Miami and supporting the team.

Stadium concession prices vs. home cooked or catered foods…

Stadium seats vs. the home couch.

I must say, I like the general idea, but think a much smaller venue would work better.

by TigerPaw on Jan 27, 2010 3:43 PM CST reply actions  

No offense,

but you sound like a guy to whom attending football games in general is not a very attractive notion. Also, not that many people have 3 or 4 thousand dollars to plunk down on an impromptu trip to Miami, but I bet a ton would drop a hundred or two on the Dome experience for that game. For Benson and the city, it would be a cash cow, and the Neilsons wouldn’t be actually losing any eyes.

"I do know that we have some unfinished business that we started a few years ago and we want to finish the deal."- Dulymus McAllister

by FuSoYa on Jan 27, 2010 8:07 PM CST up reply actions  

The NFL continues to make one bad decision after another.

I just heard on ESPN that both the Saints and the Colts were just recently informed their players would have to “attend” the Pro Bowl for media events even though they’re not playing. The idea to have the Pro Bowl the week prior to the Super Bowl was dumb enough. This is really stupid.

Also, the Pro Bowl is being played on the same field as the Super Bowl and there are no plans to re-sod or repair the field if needed. It was pointed out that if there was rain after the Pro Bowl it would leave the field in much less than the “pristine” condition that has always been a requirement in the past.

There was a rumor on ESPN that the Colts are considering not sending their players to the Pro Bowl media event and dealing with whatever subsequent fine Goodell imposes on them. If they do that, the Saints should definately do the same.

At first, I was impressed with Goodell, but this combined with his NFL Europe idea, penalizing teams for resting starters in meaningless games, etc. have changed my opinion dramatically.

by Drew-Dat on Jan 27, 2010 3:44 PM CST reply actions  

My understanding is that all they have to do is show up Sunday Morning and be at the game itself to get their game-checks. Other than that they are supposed to be excused.

If that has changed, then you are right, Goodell needs his head examined. Or maybe found.

by FriarBob on Jan 27, 2010 3:47 PM CST up reply actions  

The ESPN story definately said attend "media events". An all day thing.

That’s what the two teams are upset about. Also, they were just made aware of this in the last day or so. Nothing had been discussed previously.

The impression I got was this was for the entire team, not just the players who would have played in the game. But I won’t swear to that part.

The other impression given was that it would cause the players to leave for Miami earlier than either had planned and therefore impact practice schedules.

The NFL has forgotten this is a football game first and a “media event” second.

by Drew-Dat on Jan 27, 2010 3:52 PM CST up reply actions  

It's official. Goodell has lost his mind.

Only the players who were selected to go to the Pro Bowl are required to attend, but it isn’t “optional”. Since both quarterbacks are part of this group, it couldn’t be much worse if it were the whole team. Where it gets really crazy is the players that have to fly in a day early to attend the game are being mandated by the NFL to fly back to their home city on the same day just so they can turn around and fly back the next day with their team. All of this for some NFL photo ops. This is insane.

What about players like Brady who were voted to the Pro Bowl but elected not to play. Is Roger “making” them go to Miami regardless of if they want to or not?

by Drew-Dat on Jan 27, 2010 4:45 PM CST up reply actions  

What's the penalty for not showing up?

"Pigs have flow! Hell has frozen over! The Saints are on their way to the Superbowl!!" Hear the call

by Dan Kelly on Jan 27, 2010 5:32 PM CST up reply actions  

For those who are interested, I posted a FanShot about it...

http://www.canalstreetchronicles.com/2010/1/27/1273109/nfl-orders-colts-saints-pro

The important quote: “Though none of the 14 players will need to suit up, the NFL is requiring that they attend the game or forfeit their game check.

Source: SportingNews.com

"Pigs have flow! Hell has frozen over! The Saints are on their way to the Superbowl!!" Hear the call

by Dan Kelly on Jan 27, 2010 5:48 PM CST up reply actions  

I heard it ws optional.... on NFLN

If they want the check (25k or 50k), they have to show up. But, they can choose not to show up and not get a check.

"Pigs have flow! Hell has frozen over! The Saints are on their way to the Superbowl!!" Hear the call

by Dan Kelly on Jan 27, 2010 3:58 PM CST up reply actions  

Also, what's the penalty for not showing up?

The Saints and Colts management should just pay it. That’s ridiculous, if it’s true.

"Pigs have flow! Hell has frozen over! The Saints are on their way to the Superbowl!!" Hear the call

by Dan Kelly on Jan 27, 2010 4:00 PM CST up reply actions  

Saintsational - Here's an alternate idea.

About 30 years ago, the Oilers were returning from having just lost an AFC Divisional Game against the Steelers. In somewhat of a spur of the moment decision, the Astro Dome was opened to the public and it was publicized on the radio and TV. The team bus was diverted to the Astro Dome and literally driven into the dome where they were greeted by a near capacity crowd showing their appreciation for having gotten as far as they did. It was the event that Bum Phillips made his “two years ago, we knocked on the door. This year, we banged on the door. Next year, we’re going to knock the damn thing down” speech.

It was a great event for the team, fans and everyone else. Also might be better than having about 70,000 people converging on the airport when the Saints return. Not to mention the fact that we’ll be celebrating a victory instead of a close loss.

by Drew-Dat on Jan 27, 2010 4:06 PM CST reply actions  

Damn right ! A Big Azzed welcome home party at the Dome!

Benson hears of this no way he don’t jump on it! Be great for all invoved and he would make a ton of bucks just on shirts, beer , food, parking! And what else is cool. Give the NFL ZIP, NADDA !

by saints-fan-in-miss on Jan 28, 2010 5:22 PM CST up reply actions  

TV ratings is certainly the reason.

If you fill the Dome with 73,000 people for only one or two feeds, the ratings for the game take a hit. Let’s say most of those fans go to a party for the game with 50ish people instead: that one feed becomes about 1400 feeds. Now double that because the same rule applies to the Colts. It might be weak sauce, but I’m guessing that’s where this rule stems from.

by NOLACuse on Jan 27, 2010 5:04 PM CST reply actions  

sounds right

but definitely weak sauce.

Wanna say something? Sign up! It's free!

by Dave Cariello on Jan 27, 2010 5:11 PM CST up reply actions  

I just realized

it can’t be about TV ratings. They’ve got 70,000 people all in one place with no ability to change the channel. That’s 70,000 people guaranteed to watch the game and commercials. Anyone with a television in their house is NOT guaranteed to even watch the game. Besides, with tickets needed for entrance, they would know EXACTLY how many people were watching. In fact, it would behoove them to fill every single sports stadium in America with a captive audience.

Gotta be something else.

Wanna say something? Sign up! It's free!

by Dave Cariello on Jan 27, 2010 6:41 PM CST reply actions  

"Never assume malice when stupidity will suffice."

"Pigs have flow! Hell has frozen over! The Saints are on their way to the Superbowl!!" Hear the call

by Dan Kelly on Jan 27, 2010 6:51 PM CST up reply actions  

No. It really is. Think about it for a second. How do they calculate these numbers? By rating and share. What do those terms actually mean?

Drilled down to the basics, rating more-or-less equals the percentage of TVs in the station’s broadcast area which are tuned to that channel. They have no idea how many people are watching that particular TV, of course, but they do know (basically, at least) the number of TVs in that area. So if a show gets a 63.2 rating that means that 63.2% of all TVs in the broadcast area of WVUE.

Share more-or-less equals the percentage of TVs in the broadcast area which are tuned to that channel counting only those actually in use. So if 80% of the TVs are in use, then a show with a 63.2 rating would have a 79 share. Since the game actually had an 82% share in NO, that means that approximately 77% of all possible TVs in the area were turned on, of which 82% of them were watching the NFC championship.

And the whole point of advertising is to make as many people as possible want to buy your product. This can only be measured (at present at least) in one way — by measuring the number of TVs that are turned on and tuned into the station at the time the ad plays. The greater the ratings and share, the more people probably saw that ad and the more money that can be charged for the same time slot next day/week/month/year as appropriate.

So it really is all about the Benjamins.

by FriarBob on Jan 27, 2010 7:00 PM CST up reply actions  

I'm not a mathematician or Nielson statistician...

but can’t they just ADD that into the regular TV ratings? Doesn’t seem that hard to me. If you had 250,000 TV’s in New Orleans watching the game, just add 70,000 and assume it was 320,000 TV’s. Why can’t that work?

In fact, wouldn’t it be MORE accurate? Like I said before, just because a TV is turned on, doesn’t mean someone is actually watching it. If someone is sitting in the Superdome for the Super Bowl, it’s a pretty sure thing they are watching it. Right? Wrong?

Wanna say something? Sign up! It's free!

by Dave Cariello on Jan 27, 2010 7:40 PM CST up reply actions  

More or less exactly my suggestion up above. It would be the intelligent thing to do.

But it won’t happen in time to help us this year. If it ever happens at all.

by FriarBob on Jan 27, 2010 8:07 PM CST up reply actions  

Err make that my “second” (or alternate) suggestion up above. But yeah I thought of that. And they should. But they won’t anytime soon.

by FriarBob on Jan 27, 2010 8:07 PM CST up reply actions  

yeah, you're right

just saw it again. sorry for missing it. Seems silly. Like I said, the problem here is the ability of the league to adapt.

Wanna say something? Sign up! It's free!

by Dave Cariello on Jan 27, 2010 8:09 PM CST up reply actions  

What if they just did it anyway and used the proceeds to pay the fine???

WIN WIN!

Fat, dumb, and happy. Hell, two out of three ain't bad!

I Want To Die In My Sleep Like My Grandpa – Not Screaming and Yelling Like His Passengers.

by Just 'Nother Day on Jan 27, 2010 9:33 PM CST up reply actions  

How do they know?

How do they “Know” how many TV’s are tuned into the game or a particular show? I can see being able to figure it out with cable and satelitte systems, but how do they realistically know how many are watching to include over the air TV waves? Or is it just a best guess? Or sampling? Or made up for advertising $$?

by Comp on Jan 28, 2010 10:08 AM CST up reply actions  

A: sampling + made up for advertising $$

"Pigs have flown! Hell has frozen over! The Saints are on their way to the Superbowl!!" Hear the call

by Dan Kelly on Jan 28, 2010 11:20 AM CST up reply actions  

There are meters involved that somehow (and I really don’t understand exactly how) are able to tell which channel a TV is tuned to. Probably some sort of signal sent back from the TV, or perhaps some way of reading the way the broadcast wave morphs slightly when a TV is pulling it in. Or perhaps something totally different.

This apparently only happens in major metropolitan areas, but since those are the areas that advertisers care about most it works out OK. In theory at least.

by FriarBob on Jan 28, 2010 1:53 PM CST up reply actions  

OK, so the Dome's Not Gonna Open...other Big Venues in NOLA?

As an out of towner who said all season that if the Saints made it to the Super Bowl, I would travel to NOLA for the game (screw Miami…Super Bowl Weekend in New Orleans is going to be the experience of a lifetime), does anyone have suggestions on where to catch the game? Are there ANY larger venues that make sense? I’ve been to the city 6 times, so I’m pretty familiar with it all…

I was hoping the dome would be an option, but since that’s a no-go, what suggestions would you guys throw my way? I just booked my flight and hotel this evening, and I am SO STOKED for the trip!

GEAUX SAINTS!!!!!

by whodatny on Jan 27, 2010 11:18 PM CST reply actions  

Long Beach, NY

…just under an hour out of Manhattan. I beleive I read on a prior post you either are from or are in NY…

I know it doesn’t really matter where I go on SB Sunday…it’s gonna be nuts regardless, but I am hoping to head somewhere more “local” than Bourbon…

by whodatny on Jan 30, 2010 11:45 AM CST up reply actions  

Prytania Theater might do it again.

Other than that I would guess the biggest venues are gonna be the big bars. Maybe somewhere on Tulane’s campus will have a big viewing party?

by NOLACuse on Jan 28, 2010 9:06 AM CST up reply actions  

a.) I’ve never heard of such a policy.

b.) If there IS such a policy, it was either broken four years ago, when KeyArena televised Super Bowl XL to thousands of Seahawks fans, or instituted since.

c.) I would think neither is the case. Someone just doesn’t want to be bothered. If their IS such a policy in place, PROVE IT.

d.) I personally don’t care. Even had I not been able to obtain a ticket to the game, I would have been going to Miami. Bourbon Street and the possible celebration here isn’t really going to be any different than the Saturday night before Mardi Gras, other than more black & gold clothing and chants of “Who Dat?” On top of which, I’ve never been to Miami, nor a Super Bowl, nor an post season Saints game away from the Super Dome. Just too many “firsts” in one event to pass up.

"I was not on the boat in question." -Darren Sharper

by coldpizza on Jan 28, 2010 3:26 AM CST reply actions  

Also, the line “I want to be there in that NUMBER …”

If the lyrics read “I want to be there in that crowd estimation …” I might not think being part of an actual head count so important. Heh.

"I was not on the boat in question." -Darren Sharper

by coldpizza on Jan 28, 2010 3:32 AM CST up reply actions  

Plus, “there” isn’t “here”. The song makes no mention of New Orleans (or Miami) at all, nor was it written about a football team. “There” is clearly a reference to Heaven. I guess if you want to interpret “Heaven” as “where your loved ones are” AND you love your family, AND your family is from here (as opposed to “there”), then New Orleans might be the place for you to watch the Big Game. Still, I have a hard time with “I want to be where the Saints originated, as they march in elsewhere”. After all, be it figuratively or literally, the song is about the SAINTS, not little ol’ me. And even if it WAS about me, there’s the wanderlust factor to consider: if God didn’t want me to take road trips, He wouldn’t have made them fun. Can I get an Amen? Already being “here”, I’d rather interpret “there” as “where the Saints are marching” … wherever that place might be. The Super Bowl figuratively representing Heaven, or that ultimate destination/goal. Hence, Miami or bust.

"I was not on the boat in question." -Darren Sharper

by coldpizza on Jan 28, 2010 3:54 AM CST up reply actions  

Pretty good wine, huh? Have s'more.

Of course that’s neither here nor there.

Fat, dumb, and happy. Hell, two out of three ain't bad!

I Want To Die In My Sleep Like My Grandpa – Not Screaming and Yelling Like His Passengers.

by Just 'Nother Day on Jan 28, 2010 8:07 AM CST up reply actions  

Colts fan here

When we went to the SB a couple years ago, a Church tried to get permission to play the game there for their congregation of roughly 40 and the NFL rejected it saying that it’s illegal to showcast to a large audience.

by MarkFive05 on Jan 28, 2010 3:41 AM CST reply actions  

That’s bizarre. I know for a fact that KeyArena televised it, because they cut to the crowd several times during the Steelers-Seahawks game.

"I was not on the boat in question." -Darren Sharper

by coldpizza on Jan 28, 2010 3:56 AM CST up reply actions  

There are more than 40 people in any given sports bar.

That argument is bogus. There’s no way to enforce it, and no REASON to even think about enforcing it. There is either another reason for resisting that plan(logistics, theoretical inability to turn profit, safety, IDK), or the NFL just pulls out some arcane “rule” about that during Super Bowls because of some even more arcane profit model that they think holding these kinds of events interferes with.

"I do know that we have some unfinished business that we started a few years ago and we want to finish the deal."- Dulymus McAllister

by FuSoYa on Jan 28, 2010 10:19 AM CST up reply actions  

There are going to be more than 40 people @ the house I'll be at for the SB.

"Pigs have flown! Hell has frozen over! The Saints are on their way to the Superbowl!!" Hear the call

by Dan Kelly on Jan 28, 2010 11:21 AM CST up reply actions  

Yeah they did. I remember that story too. They also wanted to do it at the old stadium (whatever the one before Lucas Oil was called, can’t remember anymore). Both were initially turned down.

Then there was quite a bit of outcry over the fact that they tried to muscle the other churches with similar plans and a retraction for the smaller gatherings was given. But the stadium was still ixnayed.

by FriarBob on Jan 28, 2010 1:56 PM CST up reply actions  

Btw, the sightlines of the Jumbotrons in the Superdome truly suck from many seats. If you were seated in the uppermost loge areas for example, you wouldn’t see jack. The lip of the terrace eclipses the screens. The worst seats WITH a view would probably be the plaza level endzone. There, you’d have to watch the screen on the diagonal opposite end of Dome for 3 1/2 hours. Talk about a sore neck afterwards. Not saying they’d ever get 70K in there, to begin with. There’s probably be a lot of empty seats, where you could move to a better vantage point. I’d sure hate to be working a concession stand during that, though. Can you imagine how sucka** that would be? I think they’d do better at the New Orleans Arena. At least there the screens are centrally located and it would be worthwhile from a concessions standpoint. I still wouldn’t want to miss the Saints in the Super Bowl to sell nachos, but I guess some people just aren’t that into football. Sickeauxs. Hate to say it, but I’m a bit envious of Jerry Jones’s big screen, in light of times like these.

"I was not on the boat in question." -Darren Sharper

by coldpizza on Jan 28, 2010 4:08 AM CST reply actions  

The way I understand it, it's just the Super Bowl that can't be shown...

The way I understand it, it’s just the Super Bowl that can’t be shown to a “mass audience”, however that term is defined.

by realheavyd on Jan 28, 2010 8:18 AM CST reply actions  

It really makes no sense at all though

So every person in the world can watch the game on TV for free in their own homes, bars and clubs can show the game to their paying customers (whose money is not shared with the NFL, or is it? I’m not sure on that one) but the Superdome can’t broadcast the game on the Big Screen to a paying audience (whose money can be split between all involved entities, including the N(o)F(un)L(eague)), and a win-win-win situation is denied by a “long standing league rule”?

Can someone please tell me how that makes any sense at all, please?

by realheavyd on Jan 28, 2010 8:28 AM CST reply actions  

TV ratings numbers, explained above… multiple times…

by FriarBob on Jan 28, 2010 1:57 PM CST up reply actions  

WOW !! GREAT IDEA !!!

 I say do it than ask permission! LMAO !!

by saints-fan-in-miss on Jan 28, 2010 10:40 AM CST reply actions  

Old military saying, right? "It's easier to get forgiveness than permission." Go for it!

Fat, dumb, and happy. Hell, two out of three ain't bad!

I Want To Die In My Sleep Like My Grandpa – Not Screaming and Yelling Like His Passengers.

by Just 'Nother Day on Jan 28, 2010 3:42 PM CST up reply actions  

How about?

 Can’t sell tickets till Super Bowl sells out. Like yesterday. NFL gets a cut of the gate? Imagine the NFL turning down money.

by saints-fan-in-miss on Jan 28, 2010 4:53 PM CST reply actions  

LMAO!!!!! That nails it!!!!

Fat, dumb, and happy. Hell, two out of three ain't bad!

I Want To Die In My Sleep Like My Grandpa – Not Screaming and Yelling Like His Passengers.

by Just 'Nother Day on Jan 28, 2010 9:10 PM CST up reply actions  

1,300,000 Mexicans can sneak across the border and we can't get 70,000 people in the Superdome?

Maybe if we build a rickety fence around it?

Fat, dumb, and happy. Hell, two out of three ain't bad!

I Want To Die In My Sleep Like My Grandpa – Not Screaming and Yelling Like His Passengers.

by Just 'Nother Day on Jan 28, 2010 10:22 PM CST reply actions  

stupid

they should just have a “outside” group “rent” the dome for an “event”
thus cooking the books so its just the superdome was rented out to a large group of people. and what the those people do should be their own damn business.
i didnt read all the other comments on this, but yes money has to do with it 100%.
probably the fact that a team makes the superbowl and then starts selling more tickets, gives that franchise another stream of revenue into their pockets that other teams cant do cause their teams are sitting at home watching these game.
it has to do with that in some way shape or form. which is BS… the saints earned the right to play for the championship, and they should have the right to operate as they want. if other franchises complain that the saints are selling more tickets to a game that isnt actually there should shut up and make the playoffs and/or the superhowl.

side note… i should have taken you up on those superbowl tix in arizona a few years back when the gmen won. it was still amazing to see them win on tv, but being there would totally have been worth it.

by ImaMoose on Jan 29, 2010 1:14 PM CST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

The ultimate community for lovers of all things Black and Gold! The latest news, commentary, discussion, linkage and more! Join in the conversation now with all of your fellow Who Dats!

Featured Poll

Poll
How much do you think Drew Brees is worth per year? (avg. over life of contract)
Less than $17M
152 votes
$17M
52 votes
$18M
136 votes
$19M
183 votes
$20M
575 votes
$21M
212 votes
$22M
98 votes
$23M
523 votes

1931 votes | Poll has closed

Twitter-logo_medium


Head Coach

Erindavewhodat_small Dave Cariello

Assistant Coach (Editor/Contributor)

13088_f520_small David "Satch" Kelly

0113wbphillips_small Hans Petersen

Offensive Coordinators (Contributors)

Saintslogo_small Andrew Juge

Titans_small Jack Sharkey

Top_small Alex Swift

Squat_small Preston J. Gary, Jr.

100media36imag0036_small Travis Dauro

Vgfl_logo_small_small Adesola Badon

Small Jimmy Angel

Small Jordan Katz

Small Win Ellington

Super-bowl-44_small Wallace Delery

Thomas_photo_small Thomas Hukel