"Sickest" Play of the Week: The Jenksgiving Day Miracle
For this weeks Vicks sponsored post instead of discussing who powered through I've decided to break down the "sickest" (get it?) play from the Saints 30-27 Thanksgiving day victory over the Dallas Cowboys. Of course there's no question as to which particular play from that game should be chosen. In fact The Jenksgiving Day Miracle, as I've decided to call it myself, might be the sickest play across the entire league this week, not just the Saints/Cowboys.
So in case you haven't watched it fifteen times over already this holiday weekend, make the jump to see a breakdown of Saints safety Malcolm Jenkins' 4th quarter strip of Cowboys wide receiver Roy Williams and relive how it all happened.
And since this play had a similar feel as Robert Meachem's strip and score in Washington last year, I'm posing a serious question in our poll. Your vote is wanted.
Roy Williams has single coverage on the outside against Saints rookie Patrick Robinson. Advantage: Dallas. The pass is thrown, Williams slants to the inside and Robinson slips while adjusting.
Williams is wide open, gets the pass and is off to the races up the middle of the field. Robinson can now do nothing but watch. Jenkins is now in the frame seven yards upfield and needs to adjust himself as well.
Impressively, Jenkins turns on the jets and is able to position himself alongside Williams at about the 25-yard line. Williams is holding the ball in just his left hand when Jenkins makes his move at the 21-yard line, using his left hand to pry the ball away.
Jenkins starts to pull the ball from Williams, who has now turned his body in an attempt to get a second hand on the ball for security.
As they both fall to the ground together, the ball continues to leave Williams' possession and enter Jenkins'.
Jenkins secures the bobbling ball between his left hand and his crotch always making sure it doesn't hit the ground.
69 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
tough question
I have to go with Jenkins’ play as being more impressive – he had to run down WIlliams from behind after losing his footing. Meachem did run his strip back for a TD, and in that sense his might be a “bigger” play. But with no one in front of him at that point, I can’t say it’s more impressive.
Too early.
Ask me after the Superbowl.
Week 13 matchup: Bengals
Week 13 motto: Keep in the race, keep in the fight
Jenkins.
Only because it seemed to take more effort.
But, it’s very hard to chose. The Meacharound was just as unlikely and he ran in it in for score. And then there’s Meachem playing defense right up to running it in like a defensive back. Jenkins was playing within his job description.
Yeah, looks like I’m talking myself out of the Jenkins vote, but I still lean toward thinking Jenkins “do or die” moment of determination edges Meachem just a bit.
by CrazyforColston on Nov 29, 2010 12:15 PM CST reply actions
Not even close.
Jenkins simply chased a guy and caused a fumble while he wasn’t looking. That happens every week in the NFL. The Meachem play involved a tremendous interception, followed by a pursuit, a ball-scrum strip (While the Redskins player saw him coming thank you very much, a lot more difficult than a blind side strip) and subsequent return for a TD. The early vote is simply the usual of voting for something bright shiny and new. The Meachem play was amazing on many points….the Jenkins simply a play that happens usually once a weekend. The play was miraculous in that it allowed us to pull victory from the jaws of defeat. Yet the play itself, was simply a good hustle play.
"Aristotle was not Belgian. The central message of Buddhism is not 'every man for himself.' And the London Underground is not a political movement. Those are all mistakes, Otto. I looked 'em up."
by jeff.l.b on Nov 29, 2010 12:21 PM CST reply actions 2 recs
I have to go with Jeff here...although...
The Meachem strip (minus the TD, but with a game-saving aspect the Meacharound lacked) was duplicated by Roddy White this year. It’s a far easier matter to strip a defender, who isn’t used to being a ballcarrier, than to strip a receiver. Sometimes it seems you see an interceptor fumble every week.
They were both great plays. Why do we have to make choices like this?
It was worth the wait.
I would say the fact that Roddy didn't return his for a TD
makes it much less impressive than the play by Meachem. Roddy’s was a fantastic hustle play, but not close to the same level as Meachem’s. The thing that makes it a tough choice between the Meachem and Jenkins play is the timing of the game when it happened. I think Meachem’s play was as a whole more impressive given that he stripped and scored, but Jenkins’ play was needed more when it happened.
"I want to hand this trophy to the MVP of the Super Bowl -- and the MVP of the entire league, Drew Brees.''
-- Sean Payton
by DeuceisLoose926 on Nov 30, 2010 12:49 PM CST up reply actions
The early vote is simply the usual of voting for something bright shiny and new.
Bam, you said it for me.
Who dat, from a cajun exiled to cowboy country.
by alcoholic_insight on Nov 29, 2010 2:02 PM CST up reply actions
glad you let everyone know
who voted for the jenksgiving day miracle why they voted.
"If you ask ME, though, any game without push-ups, hits, burns or noogies is a sissy game" Calvin to Hobbes
have to go with Jenkins
For one reason really, every win this season from here on out is a must for playoff hopes. The NFC seems like its going to be a tight race down the stretch. If that play doesn’t happen then the Cowboys would have points whether it be 3 OR 7 which would have made it much more difficult for the Saints to pull out the win. A loss in the tight NFC would have been more costly for the Saints at this point than a loss to Washington last year. Both were tremendous heads up plays by both players and will both go down in Saints history as unforgettable but Jenkins’s has to be more important impact wise for reasons stated above.
by narco301 on Nov 29, 2010 12:21 PM CST via mobile reply actions
Both are awesome
But, I have to lean towards Jenkins’ play because it was on national TV, on Thanksgiving, and against the hated Cowboys. We also needed that win this year more than we needed that win in Washington last year. We were playing to keep our undefeated season going last season and now we’re fighting for a playoff spot. Both games swung on those two great plays by Meachem and Jenkins, but the “Jenksgiving Day Miracle” seems more significant right now.
"As soon as Tony (Dungy) said we had no chance, I knew we had 'em right where we wanted 'em"--Coach Sean Payton right after Super Bowl XLIV with the Lombardi Trophy firmly in hand. WHO DAT!!
by David "Satch" Kelly on Nov 29, 2010 12:26 PM CST reply actions
i know that getting janked is still very fresh in everybodys mind
but unfortunately ive seen many other teams make the same move running down a player and stripping it. not to take anything away form jenkins but, the meacharound was just one of a kind brilliance… meach had to cut through the redskins convoy to get to him, strip the ball, and then run it back. maybe jenkins timing in the game was more crucial, but the meacharound was just something nobodys ever seen before.
"As a Saint fan I watch ‘Gone with the Wind’ just to watch Atlanta burn" -Ralph Malbrough
by DrewBreesManCrush on Nov 29, 2010 12:41 PM CST reply actions 3 recs
Glad someone else realizes this.
"Aristotle was not Belgian. The central message of Buddhism is not 'every man for himself.' And the London Underground is not a political movement. Those are all mistakes, Otto. I looked 'em up."
you seem to look at it only one way
ability, odds, rarity, whatever you want to call it etc etc. as a suggestion, you might want to factor in what it meant at the time, to the fans, it being on a big stage and so on. i “realize” what you are saying (voted for the other) but this is nothing but opinion and emotions are a ligitimate factor in opinions. did you borrow someones high horse today jeff? lol
"If you ask ME, though, any game without push-ups, hits, burns or noogies is a sissy game" Calvin to Hobbes
Neither really meant more to me than the other. Both gave me a Michael Caine “We can still win this” feeling, despite the difference in scorelines. And so the rarity of Meachem’s play has to decide which is more impressive.
If I am good I could add years to my life / I would rather add some life to my years.
boom baby! I rec’d ya
Yes, time flies. And where did it leave you? Old too soon...smart too late. - Mike Tyson
by lovingmma25 on Nov 29, 2010 12:48 PM CST up reply actions
Meachem, every time. He was in front of the interception, so didn’t chase him down, but still. There was his initial route, his awareness of the INT, getting into position and evading a block from a Redskin, then stripping the ball, maintaining possession and returning it 40+ yards.
WR’s are stripped every week, defensive players are chased down and have interceptions knocked out every now and then, but how often does a WR takeaway an interception and return it for a touchdown?
If I am good I could add years to my life / I would rather add some life to my years.
Definitely the Meachem play. In all honesty, Jenkins should have made a play on Williams long before he did. Patrick Robinson slipped in coverage, making Williams Jenkins’s responsibility. He was basically attempting to compensate for his own poor angle of pursuit. Meachem had no such responsibility. His hustle on that play was truly above and beyond. Not to mention the laissez-faire approach to turnovers, in general. They’re inherently spirit-deflating plays, far moreso than a completed third down conversion, something that typically happens throughout the course of a game. That Meachem had the wherewithal to stick with the play and regain possession is impressive in and of itself, but to turn that strip into direct points — this by a player who ISN’T subjected to Gregg Williams’s soapbox narratives each day in practice — is simply phenomenal. That’s based on which was more impressive. In terms of importance, I’d have to go with Jenkins’s strip. Even with Meachem’s TD, the Saints still needed a missed chip shot by Suisham and a strip by Chris McAlister to win that game. Even if Jenkins makes up for Robinson’s flub with a nice open field tackle, without the strip, you’re talking about a Pisarcik type miracle needed in order to avoid the loss. Obviously neither guaranteed a win. Especially when Sean Payton continues to make Les Miles look like the Dalai Lama of clock management inside of two minutes.
"I was not on the boat in question" -Darren Sharper
Re: #25 ... CUT THAT CHUMP.
Agreed
Especially the point about an offensive player adopting a defensive mindset to strip the ball. That stuck with me too.
If you're going to fault Jenkins for being out of position
then you have to fault Meachem for being covered so tightly Drew decided to throw to Shockey in double coverage.
Once Meachem had the ball, running it in for a TD was nothing. There was no one in front him. I did forget that he split two defenders to get to the ball in the first place though. That was pretty awesome.
One other thing in Jenkins’ favor – he was stripping it from an offensive player that is drilled in ball protection. I doubt Kareem Moore had any ball handling drills in practice.
No matter how tightly Meachem was covered, it was single coverage. No one but Brees can be blamed for throwing into double coverage. He’s the one who gets paid to read defenses. Jenkins is paid to limit advancement and cause turnovers. He only failed on 50% of those duties on that particular play. Meachem is paid to get open, advance the ball and score TDs. Even if you fault him for not being open, he made good on 66% of his duties. And that’s not even including the strip.
"I was not on the boat in question" -Darren Sharper
Re: #25 ... CUT THAT CHUMP.
Can't help but notice the new signature
Wanna say something? Sign up! It's free!
by Dave Cariello on Nov 29, 2010 1:57 PM CST up reply actions
are you saying Payton should have tried to burn some clock before scoring the final TD?
Especially when Sean Payton continues to make Les Miles look like the Dalai Lama of clock management inside of two minutes.
Or are there other instances contributing to this statement? If so, what are they?
It's gonna be a great year.
by Hans Petersen on Nov 29, 2010 1:37 PM CST up reply actions
Yes, that’s what I’m saying. It happens far too often. Just last week, Mare got a FG before halftime after the offense inexplicably rushed to score. I’d estimate at least a dozen times during Payton’s tenure he’s left enough time on the clock for the opponent to answer, be it at the end of the half or the game.
"I was not on the boat in question" -Darren Sharper
Re: #25 ... CUT THAT CHUMP.
Or a legitimate opportunity to answer, I should say. They may not have capitalized a dozen times.
"I was not on the boat in question" -Darren Sharper
Re: #25 ... CUT THAT CHUMP.
That may be because the offense is much more effective in a hurry up style offense compared to the hurry up and run out the clock style O. Though I agree with you 100%, he may be more worried about not scoring.
Week 13 matchup: Bengals
Week 13 motto: Keep in the race, keep in the fight
by Jon Banks on Nov 29, 2010 2:30 PM CST via mobile up reply actions
a.) At that point, one running play (or short pass) isn’t going to throw a monkey wrench into that MO any more than it would throughout course of the game.
b.) It wasn’t first-and-goal. If the end zone isn’t there on 2nd-4th downs, they could run shorter come back routes for the first. If you can’t cover 12 yards in 7 snaps with nearly 2 minutes to play, then you probably don’t deserve to win the game.
"I was not on the boat in question" -Darren Sharper
Re: #25 ... CUT THAT CHUMP.
That’s interesting you bring that up…I always struggle with which philosophy to take for. One side, and this is especially true this year due to the their struggles in the red zone says, “you have the shot at scoring on 1st down, take it…who knows what 2nd, 3rd and maybe 4th down would bring…” Coming out of the 2 minute warning made milking the clock difficult in this instance, but that’s nothing a running play wouldn’t have helped along. The other side is take the time off the clock so the other team doesn’t get that shot to tie or take the lead; make your attempt, the last attempt.
In this game, that take it now philosophy allowed for a 59 yard FG attempt; an attempt with just a little hook on it away from sending the game into OT. Or, in the case of the Packers, that same philosophy allowed a FG attempt by the Falcons to win.
There’s a lot that has to go into the decision…but I’d agree it’s a lot easier to control the clock and the outcome when you have the ball.
I had the same thought of wanting to run the clock down before scoring
but given our red zone troubles this year, I decided it was better to just score a TD in whatever way we could, since we needed a TD to reclaim the lead.
Now, if the circumstances were different, and we only needed a FG to take the lead or put the game out of reach, then I feel ok about milking the clock down and having the ball go boom through the uprights as :00 shows on the game clock (like we did against Philadelphia in the regular season of 2006).
It is a bit maddening to see a team come back and get a FG after we’ve aced a TD with less than a minute on the clock, like Dallas and Seattle did at the half, but when you’re trying to score a TD, I think it’s harder to massage the clock without shooting yourself in the foot.
Always an interesting debate, as I can see both sides of the argument with valid points/counterpoints…
It's gonna be a great year.
by Hans Petersen on Nov 29, 2010 2:44 PM CST up reply actions 1 recs
There are only two situations in which I’d be in favor of NOT taking as much time as possible to score, regardless of how much time is left on the clock, but ESPECIALLY within two minutes of the end of the game: a.) if we were down by 9 or more points, or b.) if it’s 4th and goal. Anything outside of that is poor clock management, imo.
"I was not on the boat in question" -Darren Sharper
Re: #25 ... CUT THAT CHUMP.
You can bet this would have been the hottest of topics this week, had Dallas converted that FG and won in OT, btw. All of which could have easily fallen outside the realm of Sean Payton’s playcalling (unless he decides to onside kick to begin OT, which I suppose is entirely possible, considering who we’re talking about).
"I was not on the boat in question" -Darren Sharper
Re: #25 ... CUT THAT CHUMP.
i do recall talking about this subject last summer with you pizza
took me a while to find, but heres the link to the story:
http://www.canalstreetchronicles.com/2009/7/5/938246/sean-payton-spiralling-downward
"As a Saint fan I watch ‘Gone with the Wind’ just to watch Atlanta burn" -Ralph Malbrough
by DrewBreesManCrush on Nov 29, 2010 4:06 PM CST up reply actions
Really? You're upset that we scored too fast?
What if we didn’t score at all. Try to run the clock down and don’t get anything. Don’t pass up on an opportunity to take the lead that late in the game because you think you can run more clock. Nothing is guaranteed at that point and a field goal does nothing. And how about having a little faith in our defense to hold them. The D has been playing very well this season. You score and put your faith in your defense to make a stop. I can’t find fault in clock management there.
Peyton, I can eat Oreos faster than you!!!!
“The D has been playing very well this season.”
They had just blown a 17 point lead and gotten torched on a 3rd-and-long the series prior. That’s about all the faith I’m willing to muster on any given Sunday (and/or Thursday).
"I was not on the boat in question" -Darren Sharper
Re: #25 ... CUT THAT CHUMP.
is les miles
still in primus?
"If you ask ME, though, any game without push-ups, hits, burns or noogies is a sissy game" Calvin to Hobbes
correction
it was les claypool
"If you ask ME, though, any game without push-ups, hits, burns or noogies is a sissy game" Calvin to Hobbes
The Meacharound
if nothing more than the fact that I had him on my fantasy team and it took them almost 2 days to figure out how to credit him for all those things (tackle solo, forced fumble, fumble recovery, Def TD) They may have given him more but it was like 30 points, crazy!
Also because i had to “watch” the game on GameChannel, watching gamechannel try to keep up with that play was midly annoying.
SP: "No, No, No. I said 'Let's all take it to the Vikes again' not' Let's all take 2 Vicoden!'"
Meachem
Strip a defender who just picked off our QB plus run it back for a TD. Simple question and answer in my book.
I like Hamburgers!
Can't believe the vote is even this close
Wanna say something? Sign up! It's free!
by Dave Cariello on Nov 29, 2010 1:58 PM CST reply actions 1 recs
Meachem
It was a beautiful play. Most other top notch receivers wouldn’t have even tried what he did, much less try to tackle the guy.
Kinda like comparing apples and oranges.
Meachem’s was the more impressive just comparing play versus play. But Jenkins may have been more important to the outcome of the game.
Had Meachem not stripped the ball and returned it for a TD, we still had an entire second half to win the game. Had Jenkins not made his play, the odds of us having won that game would have been very, very slim at best.
Both were outstanding plays and neither one makes the other any less impressive.
Agreed. I’d rather wait to find out the deeper meaning of the play when the season is over. Meaning which play was more crucial. If we go to the superbowl again this year the janked™ was a massively important play, if not meacharound was. Though, the meacharound was the far more impressive one.
Week 13 matchup: Bengals
Week 13 motto: Keep in the race, keep in the fight
by Jon Banks on Nov 29, 2010 2:34 PM CST via mobile up reply actions
Meachem strip was Epic!
It was the strip that not only saved the game, but saved the No.1 seed as well. Jenkins strip was Epic as well. Saved from being a 2 game behind Atl. So they were both great in my book. But Meachem has a little edge on it. That was the play of the decade!
Your one and only..Professional Sports Blogger!
This question is unfair - like asking me which of my two children I love more.
Okay, maybe not. I give Meachem a slight edge because it was so heads up. You don’t expect a receiver to make a play like that. A defensive back – sure, but a receiver? Tremendous awareness my Meachem.
You know you love your youngest child better
Wanna say something? Sign up! It's free!
by Dave Cariello on Nov 29, 2010 3:47 PM CST up reply actions
Is Nabb1 one of your parents?
It's gonna be a great year.
by Hans Petersen on Nov 29, 2010 3:58 PM CST up reply actions
No
But I’ve met him in person.
Wanna say something? Sign up! It's free!
by Dave Cariello on Nov 29, 2010 4:20 PM CST up reply actions
No
I was just messing with him.
Wanna say something? Sign up! It's free!
by Dave Cariello on Nov 29, 2010 5:59 PM CST up reply actions
it's funny
I just got back from Florida and at Universal Studios, they sell Thing 1 and Thing 2 T-shirts (all the way up to Thing 4) and I was joking that the shirts are so parents can rank their children by favorites.
Peyton, I can eat Oreos faster than you!!!!
Just glad to see that we're picking guys in the first round
who occasionally make miracles. That’s nice.
Meacharound
Because It happened right in front of us at fed-ex. It’s one of those: You Had To Be There. Of course both plays were great, and hopefully, both plays were Super…
A SAINT in Panther country
by carolinasaintsfan on Nov 29, 2010 4:18 PM CST reply actions
I don't see how this is close
Meacharound all the way. And for all of those people saying that the Meacharound was less important, you have got to be kidding me? Did you forget that play might have saved the game in a season where we end up clinching home field advantage (in which Minnesota owned the tie-breaker) in route to our city’s first Super Bowl? Barring that very simple fact, Meachem’s play was one of the most ridiculous plays I have ever seen in football. You will never, ever, see that particular play again.
Jenkins' was A More Important Play
I liked both plays, but the Meachem play was better just because of the end result of that play. Jenkins’ was more important because of the plays afterward and what it led to, VICTORY over da boyz.
I like it!! I love it!! I want some mo of it!! Supa Bowl Rings, Dat Is!!
Jenkins...
…for selfish reasons. I work with a die hard cowgirls fan and I’ve had to listen to him run his damn mouth since Dec 19th last year. Plus we made a little wager earlier in the season. So thank u, Malcom for my steak dinner and a year of bragging rights.
by BlknGldSoulja on Nov 29, 2010 6:03 PM CST via mobile reply actions
Nice!
Wanna say something? Sign up! It's free!
by Dave Cariello on Nov 29, 2010 7:20 PM CST up reply actions
Hahaha was just about to ask if I can choose based on selfish reasons!
If only because I live in Dallas. I love you MJ.
Breesus Is My Homeboy
Awesome is an understatement. The man is mayor of freaking Tangipahoa!
"I was not on the boat in question" -Darren Sharper
Re: #25 ... CUT THAT CHUMP.

by 
































