Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: NFL Players Ready To Welcome Gay Teammate

New Orleans Saints' Offensive Player Grades @ Falcons

Forgetting for a second that this was arguably the offense's worst performance of the season, which came in a game with the highest stakes, it's important to note that they were able to put together the most important drive of the season when it counted. As bad as Brees had been to that point, he put the team on his shoulders and showed the true heart of a champion. The offense also deserves a tremendous amount of credit for closing the game, getting two first downs to run out the clock and never allow the Falcons to sniff another chance at stealing the win. Below are the grades.

Saints vs Falcons coverage

Saints vs Falcons recap

Saints vs Falcons boxscore

Star-divide

Drew Brees: C+ (2.89) Incredibly hard it is to grade Brees on this performance. The most notable play he made was tackling John Abraham after one of the most athletic interceptions I've ever seen by a defensive lineman. He doesn't make that tackle and Abraham is gone for a touchdown, and Atlanta wins the game. Instead, he gave his defense a chance to bail him out again, which they happily obliged with. That interception was a fantastic play by Abraham, and bad luck for Brees. Hard to fault him there. His first interception, though, was on a horrible flip to Chauncey Davis as he was trying to avoid a sack.  Of all the interceptions I've seen Brees throw, this had to be the worst. Considering the timing, too, which saw the Saints barely clinging to a 10-7 lead, the pick was an absolute back breaker of a mistake that gave Atlanta a 14-10 lead. But somehow, someway, with the chips down, Brees rallied his troops and got a win. There's no way to really grade guts, but one thing you can never take away from Brees is that no matter how bad he's playing, he will never quit. He lead the Saints on a game winning touchdown drive in a way that only hall of famers do. He finished 35-49 for 302 yards, 1 touchdown and 2 interceptions.  

Reggie Bush: C- (2.19) The Saints ran the ball 24 times, with Chris Ivory out of the game, and Bush gets 1? I'm not sure how much sense that makes. With the running game struggling, I was really confused as to why the Saints wouldn't hand him the ball if anything more than just to keep Atlanta's defense honest. He had 4 receptions for 20 yards and 3 punt returns for 10 yards. His lone carry went for no gain. It was completely forgettable. My main grip with Reggie was that he looked just a slight step slow which allowed defenders to catch him. The separation he normally gets in open space just isn't happening right now, and because he doesn't really have tackle breaking ability, it's making him a below average player. Give Reggie credit for his job in blitz pickups, though, which was by far the best thing he did. His pass blocking recognition and execution has really come a long way.

Pierre Thomas: B+ (2.78)  He didn't do a great job as a kick returner, finishing with 2 returns for a 21.5 yard average. Based on the stats alone, one might think PT didn't have a great game: 19 carries for 63 yards (3.3 avg) and 7 catches for 39 yards (5.6 avg). While his per touch averages were modest, Thomas fight and intangibles in this game were instrumental. Like Bush, he did a phenomenal job in blitz pickups. Atlanta sent blitz after blitz at Brees, and Thomas helped him from getting killed. On the game winning touchdown drive, he contributed a huge 22 yard gain in a screen pass. On the clock running drive to end the game, He converted first downs on runs of 4 yards on 2nd and 3 and 3 yards on 3rd and 1. I still don't think the Saints gave their running game enough of a chance, but the Falcons were routinely in the backfield hitting Thomas behind the line of scrimmage. He fought hard for every yard that he got, and he also scored the first touchdown on a nice run.

Heath Evans: C- (2.60) His lone target was a throw away pass by Brees where Evans was in the vicinity. The Saints had 72 yards on 24 carries (3.0 average), and while that was mostly due to the offensive line getting beat, Heath Evans had a subpar game. His push at the point of attack just wasn't as impressive as what we're used to.

Marques Colston: D (2.93) Colston finished with 2 catches for 21 yards, but that wasn't for lack of Drew Brees going his way. Colston has been steady and performing this year but like Drew Brees he can always be counted on for a token mistake during a game. In this game, he multiplied his drops. He's had some struggled securing the football lately, which is surprising because we're so used to him making circus grabs. It's almost like his timing with Brees is off when it should be as good as ever. 

Devery Henderson: B- (2.11) He bounced back from an early game drop to make a nice contribution in the passing game. He finished with 3 catches for 35 yards, and he had a 9 yard reverse that came at a crucial time on the game winning drive. It's nice to see him involved in the offense again, because he can make a difference. 

Robert Meachem: A (2.48) Brees targeted Meachem a whooping 13 times, and it yielded 10 catches and 101 yards. Meachem was consistently moving the chains and making plays. It was a role we're not real used to seeing from Meachem as he went away from the deep threat and became the go to underneath route option. With Atlanta so focused on blanketing Moore and Colston, it opened up a lot of real estate for Henderson and Meachem and Brees took advantage. It was nice to see Meachem step up in a year that's been slightly disappointing for him. His hands had been suspect in recent weeks, but they were like glue in this one.

Lance Moore: B (2.89) Moore had another decent game, reliably fielding punts deep in Saints territory and getting open in the passing game. While he was quiet for a large part of the game, he came up with two crucial catches on the game winning drive to move the chains when it mattered most. Few plays were bigger than his 18 yard reception on 3rd and 11 from the Saints' 9 to keep the drive alive. He finished with 4 catches for 48 yards.

Jeremy Shockey: C (2.64) He had one catch for 12 yards on a very low throw by Brees. Ed Hoculi had a very odd explanation on that play, not that I'm complaining. The reception was reviewed Hoculi claimed that while the ball touched the ground, it was secure against Shockey's chest. That's not what I saw on the replay at all, but hey, I'll take it. Either way it was a fantastic effort on a poorly thrown ball. Other than that, Shockey didn't play much and he wasn't targeted. Shockey is not being used at all as a blocker, which leads me to believe he's injured.  

Jimmy Graham: B+ (3.07) He scored the game winning touchdown, and once again proved he's the Saints most reliable red zone target right now. More reliable than Colston, Moore, Bush or Shockey. He finished with 4 receptions, 26 yards, and the all important touchdown. He now has the highest GPA of any player on offense, and that's a tribute to how consistently he's made plays in the second half of the season.

Jermon Bushrod: D (2.38) He had no place on the field with John Abraham. While he never yielded a sack to him, Brees was under constant pressure from Bushrod's side and it forced Brees to pay constant attention to blindside pressure. His run blocking was terrible. I still like Bushrod but I question whether he is the long term answer at left tackle. I'd like to see what Charles Brown can offer at some time, more maybe we can give Strief a longer look at that position.

Carl Nicks: C- (2.80) His pass protection and run blocking was an overwhelming disappointment. For the standout "mauler" of the group, he got pushed around like a ragdoll. While he never made a mistake that outright hurt the team, he just wasn't dominant at all. Based on his ability I don't doubt he'll bounce back in a hurry.  

Jonathan Goodwin: C+ (2.69) His pass protection was leaky. I thought he was arguably the best run blocker on the day, making nice pulls and getting big hits on Falcon linebackers at the second level, but half the time the play was behind him and the runner was getting stuffed.  Like most Saints lineman on the day, he navigated between decent and mediocre.

Jahri Evans: B (2.76) He was by far the best Saint on the day on the line. His pass blocking was solid and clean, and the few plays that had success on the ground were all behind him. While the line as a whole was manhandled for most of the day, Evans was a bright spot. He seems to have cleaned up his penalty spell that plagued him for most of the season. The lineman with the best GPA will come down to the final week. 

Jon Stinchcomb: C- (2.49)  He was beaten badly by John Abraham on the lone sack the Saints gave up. I'm not sure how that's the only sack the line yielded, because there was pressure in Brees' face all day long. Stinchcomb gave up significant pressure from his side all game long, and got no initial push off the line of scrimmage. He was mediocre, but he played hard to the end of the whistle and didn't give up on plays.

Zach Strief: D+ (2.31) With David Thomas and Jeremy Shockey both out or hardly playing, Strief had a chance to show his muscle off the edge with more reps than usual and he struggled. The running game saw penetration from his side, and he didn't have the lateral quickness to deal with Atlanta's edge speed. I'll say this: Atlanta plays very fast.

My Offensive Player of the Week: Robert Meachem

Poll
Who Was Your Offensive Player of the Game?
Drew Brees
49 votes
Pierre Thomas
75 votes
Robert Meachem
109 votes
Jimmy Graham
84 votes

317 votes | Poll has closed

Comment 52 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

More from Canal Street Chronicles

Caption This

May 2012 by Dave Cariello - 25 comments

What is Drew Brees Worth?

May 2012 by Dave Cariello - 60 comments

Comments

Display:

I think you are kind of harsh on the Brees grading. Think he deserves a B- or B at the most. We did win the game and he did put the winning drive together and scrambled like a mofo to make plays.

Reggie deserves a D+. I don’t remember anything he did other than getting caught by a linebacker when he was wide open…

by Swidub on Dec 29, 2010 7:17 AM CST reply actions  

While that may be true, that blitz was also 100% called out before the play by Brees to Reggie on exactly who to block.

Reggie simply did exactly what he was told on that play, in other words a C to a C+ play. If he picked it up on reaction like Pierre did a few times, that would be different.

"Aristotle was not Belgian. The central message of Buddhism is not 'every man for himself.' And the London Underground is not a political movement. Those are all mistakes, Otto. I looked 'em up."

by jeff.l.b on Dec 29, 2010 9:54 AM CST up reply actions  

LOL!

It was an audible and the QB always tells the rb’s where to look to pick up the blitz. I’ve seen all of them miss that pickup after Brees told them to pick it up, many times…Reggie did well by being forceful with it.

2010 is cuzzin's breakout year...run with that chip bruh!

by TAYDIGGA on Dec 29, 2010 2:51 PM CST up reply actions  

yup, which is why I say C+. It was pointed out and he executed….C. He executed it well…C+. To rate higher on a blitz pickup…it would in my opinion have to be getting picked up without the initial call out, which happens all the time, and I admit Reggie tends to do fairly well. Honestly I could almost say it was not having Bush and Thomas back there in blitz pickups that have hurt Brees’ production just as much as the lack of consistent running game.

"Aristotle was not Belgian. The central message of Buddhism is not 'every man for himself.' And the London Underground is not a political movement. Those are all mistakes, Otto. I looked 'em up."

by jeff.l.b on Dec 29, 2010 3:10 PM CST up reply actions  

jeff, how do you know that Reggie didn’t see the need for the pickup before Brees pointed it out to him?

Answer: You don’t.

Result: A+ on the block. He took that guy out.

That Georgia's always on my mind.

by stujo4 on Dec 29, 2010 3:14 PM CST up reply actions  

You don’t…which is also why you can’t give an A+. You have to grade on what you know. You guys are acting like a C+ on a play is bad.

"Aristotle was not Belgian. The central message of Buddhism is not 'every man for himself.' And the London Underground is not a political movement. Those are all mistakes, Otto. I looked 'em up."

by jeff.l.b on Dec 29, 2010 3:49 PM CST up reply actions  

I want to start a new segment where I grade ur comments. Here goes...

jeff.i.b: C+ Too verbose
stujo 4: B- Kind of mean
TAYDIGGA: A- Short and Sweet
Ragin Who Dat: A+ Man that dude knows wut he’s talking about.

All in fun guys, hehe.

Our fat punk kicker, Garrett Hartley, missed a game-winner and we lost for the second week in a row - Scott Fujita in 2009

by Ragin Who Dat on Dec 29, 2010 4:49 PM CST up reply actions   2 recs

yeah!

Grading the graders.

And then we can grade the graders who graded the graders.

Kinda like holding up a mirror to a mirror.

It's gonna be a great year.

by Hans Petersen on Dec 29, 2010 5:11 PM CST up reply actions   1 recs

Sooner or later paradox will happen....then boom.

"Aristotle was not Belgian. The central message of Buddhism is not 'every man for himself.' And the London Underground is not a political movement. Those are all mistakes, Otto. I looked 'em up."

by jeff.l.b on Dec 29, 2010 5:30 PM CST up reply actions  

did you know if you stare into a mirror in a mirror

for too long you’ll go crazy and be in a state of delusion for the rest of your life?!!!

2010 is cuzzin's breakout year...run with that chip bruh!

by TAYDIGGA on Dec 29, 2010 6:08 PM CST up reply actions  

BOOM rec'd it

That Georgia's always on my mind.

by stujo4 on Dec 30, 2010 9:16 AM CST up reply actions  

The problem that I see is the film that showed the Atlanta defense shifting for Reggie in motion leaving Graham open for a first down and the game winning TD. The fact he has that much of an influence on the defense means that his grade should be higher.

by Saintsfan75 on Dec 30, 2010 1:48 AM CST up reply actions  

We were merely talking about the one pass block…not overall. I agree he did a lot of little things that went unnoticed for the most part in that game.

"Aristotle was not Belgian. The central message of Buddhism is not 'every man for himself.' And the London Underground is not a political movement. Those are all mistakes, Otto. I looked 'em up."

by jeff.l.b on Dec 30, 2010 11:10 AM CST up reply actions  

that's a good point too...

2010 is cuzzin's breakout year...run with that chip bruh!

by TAYDIGGA on Dec 29, 2010 6:07 PM CST up reply actions  

i hear that, makes sense

2010 is cuzzin's breakout year...run with that chip bruh!

by TAYDIGGA on Dec 29, 2010 6:07 PM CST up reply actions  

Swidub

I agree with you about Brees’ grade. I give him a B+. He did a great job on numerous occasions escaping that blitzing defense. And for him to come back with the touchdown to Graham. Brees does do some bad, but unlike other Quarterbacks, even Brady, he knows how to manage the offense and come back. Just that alone I give him a good grade.

by tommy v on Dec 29, 2010 12:08 PM CST up reply actions  

Brees was the offensive line pretty much

Yes, time flies. And where did it leave you? Old too soon...smart too late. - Mike Tyson

by lovingmma25 on Dec 29, 2010 1:58 PM CST up reply actions  

He gets a D for getting one carry?

You don’t remember the blitz pick up? What about the first downs he got us. Or how he swayed the D on that Graham TD? I think Brees did fine, a B is good and PT gets a B because he did what he needed to when we needed it.

2010 is cuzzin's breakout year...run with that chip bruh!

by TAYDIGGA on Dec 29, 2010 2:55 PM CST up reply actions  

yeah too bad I didn’t read this before I posted LOL

by Saintsfan75 on Dec 30, 2010 1:49 AM CST up reply actions  

all good, you at to the Reggie club...

LOL.

2010 is cuzzin's breakout year...run with that chip bruh!

by TAYDIGGA on Dec 30, 2010 1:02 PM CST up reply actions  

I think that Jimmy was on fire as well as Meach, but I had to give the toss to Graham for the game winner. He is proving to be an outstanding TE for his rookie year.

by Saintsfan75 on Dec 29, 2010 7:44 AM CST reply actions  

anti-rec

Ridiculous. This game was the second biggest win of the season (Vikes first, Steelers third). You give Brees a C+ for desperately trying to make something happen. And no, that’s not the worst or ugliest pick he’s ever thrown. There have been plenty of times he’s tried to throw into tight coverage when he shouldn’t have even considered it.

Why don’t you post this crap over on Saints Report so it doesn’t diminish the value of CSC?

That Georgia's always on my mind.

by stujo4 on Dec 29, 2010 10:11 AM CST reply actions  

I don't think it's ridiculous at all...

We were in the lead. Why did he desperately need to make something happen? That pick 6 was moronic and it was only after Atlanta took the lead with it did something desperately need to happen. This pick was not a result of throwing into tight coverage, it was not miscommunication with the running back or wideout, and it wasn’t Jack the Ripper(bad joke). With the way the defense was playing, take the damn sack.

"Now you see that evil will always triumph because good is dumb."

by jack_casse on Dec 29, 2010 10:35 AM CST up reply actions  

I kinda agree with bot of you

He should hve just taken the sack, but he should have gotten at least a B. Those moves of his in avoiding the pressure was amazing, and he avoided 4 sacks with his moves. I know we have become accustomed to seeing brees move around the pocket but you can’t grade him on a perfection scale.

Week 17 matchup: Bucs
Week 17 motto: I have a manlove with Pierre.
Canal Street Chronicles-you know you want to

by Jon Banks on Dec 29, 2010 10:55 AM CST via mobile up reply actions  

I wouldn't trade Brees for anyone else...

but for some reason he has shown a tendency to throw the most baffling picks at the most inopportune times this season. He needs to clean this crap up for the playoffs.

"Now you see that evil will always triumph because good is dumb."

by jack_casse on Dec 29, 2010 11:48 AM CST up reply actions  

I agree. Taking the sack or throwing it away would have been the better choice. That pick among others has really confused me. That particular one was extremely baffling. I think he’s trying to force too much. The deep ball as well has not happened this year much and he keeps looking for it.

"I want the gas pedal down." Sean Payton
I'm a Saints fan--Hubby's a Bears fan.

by SaintsChick on Dec 29, 2010 11:56 AM CST up reply actions  

He was trying to flip it out to Reggie, but he didn’t see the DL that was coming up on the side.

by Saintsfan75 on Dec 30, 2010 1:50 AM CST up reply actions  

honestly

I believe Brees deserved a grade somewhere in the B range. He tries to do so much for the team when the O Line is playing like crap.

You also fault the guy for many of his picks this season. He’s like 6 feet, and about 8-9 of his interceptions have come from tipped balls. If only he were a couple of inches taller…

by Ezio_Auditore on Dec 29, 2010 11:54 AM CST up reply actions  

Maybe if Payton would dial up a running play every now and then....

Then Brees wouldn’t have to throw the damn ball 50 times a game and run for his life every play. Then maybe he’s not pulling a Favre with stupid shuttle passes. I blame Payton for that as much as I blame Brees. They have other players on the team who can carry the load too if they’re given the chance. It’s Payton’s fault for putting it all on Brees.

Our fat punk kicker, Garrett Hartley, missed a game-winner and we lost for the second week in a row - Scott Fujita in 2009

by Ragin Who Dat on Dec 29, 2010 4:54 PM CST up reply actions  

Payton and Andy Reid

Both great and can only lose to themselves because they’re too in love with the pass. They need to fall in love with the run, not just do it begrudgingly.

2010 is cuzzin's breakout year...run with that chip bruh!

by TAYDIGGA on Dec 29, 2010 6:12 PM CST up reply actions  

Why the heck is Charles Brown inactive every single game? I think he's a better option at LT than Bushrod

Maybe they’re trying to develop him because he’s still a little raw, if that’s the case then I don’t mind. I just hope they’re not disappointed in his development because we might be looking at the most disappointing draft picks in a long time lol.

Patrick Robinson has played well but has also been inactive way too often for a 1st round pick
Charles Brown has been inactive since that false start at the beginning of the season on a FG attempt
Jimmy Graham is a monster
Where the **** is Al Woods lmao?
Is Matt Tennant active?? I don’t recall seeing him on the inactive list before the games
Sean Canfield? LOL

Taylor Gang or wear a #6 Miami Heat Jersey in Cleveland

by AKAY47 on Dec 29, 2010 10:44 AM CST reply actions  

Back injury that still hasn’t fully healed up, it seems.

I hope he’s finally healthy for this last game and we can try him out at least some of the snaps. That seems like a gameplan we should consider, if for no other reason than to give him experience he will likely need at some point (maybe soon if he’s already any good).

by FriarBob on Dec 29, 2010 11:05 AM CST up reply actions  

AlWoods will start for the Bucs this Sunday…

Matt Tennant has been active evety game I believe (ST)

Canfield is always on the sideline on game day….to get dropped on Monday

Bring the metal....

by bondcrash on Dec 29, 2010 11:08 AM CST up reply actions  

Andrew

I disagree with you about Graham being the most reliable receiver for the Saints in the red zone right now over Colston, Moore and Meachem. I understand maybe Meachem because he is more of a bomb catcher. Colston I understand because he has been dropping as many balls as he catches. But I think Lance is the more reliable one. I love Graham, he will be an allstar as we all know, but I just can’t put him over Lance in the red zone. Not now anyway.

by tommy v on Dec 29, 2010 12:22 PM CST reply actions  

I'm not going to get into complaining to much

But man our offensive tackles suck

World Champions at last

by mississippisaintsfan on Dec 29, 2010 12:35 PM CST reply actions  

Tory Humphrey

The man played a good 1/3 of the downs from what I could see and no mention?

"I understand this is a violent game. It's the only place you can hit somebody and not go to jail. So you understand that it's a privilege to play this game." Danny Clark

by cscmember on Dec 29, 2010 12:55 PM CST reply actions  

Pierre Da Man

I say give him an A-.

Without Pierre giving us all he’s got then we don’t win this game. To recap, Pierre does the following:

1) Scores our first TD.
2) Helps us eat up over 7 minutes on our last scoring drive, and
3) Converts 1st downs when we were running out the clock to seal the game

He plays with heart and soul. What a great player. Thank God he’s back.

Our fat punk kicker, Garrett Hartley, missed a game-winner and we lost for the second week in a row - Scott Fujita in 2009

by Ragin Who Dat on Dec 29, 2010 1:43 PM CST reply actions  

we say that now, until Ivory comes back...

2010 is cuzzin's breakout year...run with that chip bruh!

by TAYDIGGA on Dec 29, 2010 2:53 PM CST up reply actions  

I’ll say it even after Ivory is back and at 100%. Ivory runs harder pad on pad with more speed than Thomas. Thomas is by far more elusive and breaks a lot more tackles because of it, better in the pass game, and a much, much better blocker than Ivory. He’s simply the much better all around back.

"Aristotle was not Belgian. The central message of Buddhism is not 'every man for himself.' And the London Underground is not a political movement. Those are all mistakes, Otto. I looked 'em up."

by jeff.l.b on Dec 29, 2010 3:14 PM CST up reply actions   1 recs

He’s simply the much better all around back.

He’s not better when he’s on the sideline in street clothes because he got hurt. AGAIN.

That Georgia's always on my mind.

by stujo4 on Dec 29, 2010 3:16 PM CST up reply actions  

True…how’s Ivory looked the past couple of weeks by the way?

It’s one of the many reasons I don’t want Pierre to leave to be replaced by Ivory. Not only do I think Pierre is the better back…we’d be exchanging one injury prone RB for another.

"Aristotle was not Belgian. The central message of Buddhism is not 'every man for himself.' And the London Underground is not a political movement. Those are all mistakes, Otto. I looked 'em up."

by jeff.l.b on Dec 29, 2010 3:50 PM CST up reply actions  

I would love to see Ivory and Thomas in the backfield together

Especially if Payton actually lets them run the ball every now and then. The opposing defense won’t know what the hell to do.

Our fat punk kicker, Garrett Hartley, missed a game-winner and we lost for the second week in a row - Scott Fujita in 2009

by Ragin Who Dat on Dec 29, 2010 5:00 PM CST up reply actions  

honestly, very few RB's rarely get hurt...

Chris Johnson is one of them and a lot has to do with his style.

2010 is cuzzin's breakout year...run with that chip bruh!

by TAYDIGGA on Dec 29, 2010 6:06 PM CST up reply actions  

and his frame – he’s a thin RB

Yes, time flies. And where did it leave you? Old too soon...smart too late. - Mike Tyson

by lovingmma25 on Dec 30, 2010 10:07 AM CST up reply actions  

Most get banged up. However, most also manage to play for at least 15 games a season, not say…10 on average.

"Aristotle was not Belgian. The central message of Buddhism is not 'every man for himself.' And the London Underground is not a political movement. Those are all mistakes, Otto. I looked 'em up."

by jeff.l.b on Dec 30, 2010 11:11 AM CST up reply actions  

true but I'd say 13 games...

at least 15 means the only other alternative is a full season, which was my point they rarely do, they usually miss at least one game. But I’m just being anal…these fools got it rough.

2010 is cuzzin's breakout year...run with that chip bruh!

by TAYDIGGA on Dec 30, 2010 1:00 PM CST up reply actions  

Yea

I like the way PT runs, he’s got a snake like elusiveness to him. Makes him hard to tackle, he’s just slow!

2010 is cuzzin's breakout year...run with that chip bruh!

by TAYDIGGA on Dec 29, 2010 6:05 PM CST up reply actions  

our o-line can’t be too bad b/c Brees has been injury free unlike most of the other teams in the NFC like the Bears, Packers, Eagles, Seahawks, etc

Yes, time flies. And where did it leave you? Old too soon...smart too late. - Mike Tyson

by lovingmma25 on Dec 30, 2010 11:14 AM CST reply actions  

that could be just a matter of time though...

2010 is cuzzin's breakout year...run with that chip bruh!

by TAYDIGGA on Dec 30, 2010 1:03 PM CST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

The ultimate community for lovers of all things Black and Gold! The latest news, commentary, discussion, linkage and more! Join in the conversation now with all of your fellow Who Dats!

Featured Poll

Poll
How much do you think Drew Brees is worth per year? (avg. over life of contract)
Less than $17M
152 votes
$17M
52 votes
$18M
136 votes
$19M
183 votes
$20M
575 votes
$21M
212 votes
$22M
98 votes
$23M
523 votes

1931 votes | Poll has closed

Twitter-logo_medium


Head Coach

Erindavewhodat_small Dave Cariello

Assistant Coach (Editor/Contributor)

13088_f520_small David "Satch" Kelly

0113wbphillips_small Hans Petersen

Offensive Coordinators (Contributors)

Saintslogo_small Andrew Juge

Titans_small Jack Sharkey

Top_small Alex Swift

Squat_small Preston J. Gary, Jr.

100media36imag0036_small Travis Dauro

Vgfl_logo_small_small Adesola Badon

Small Jimmy Angel

Small Jordan Katz

Small Win Ellington

Super-bowl-44_small Wallace Delery

Thomas_photo_small Thomas Hukel