Saints Defense in Decline?
Remember earlier this season when we were all complaining about the Saints struggling offense while praising the defense for keeping the team alive in more than a few games?
Well the tables appeared to have turned, as if the two units simultaneously wished upon an ornamental skull. For the past three weeks it's the offense that has found its rhythm and returned to its point-scoring, yardage-eating ways while the defense's production has dropped significantly, the two never meeting in the middle.
So why has the Saints defense started to struggle as of late? A look at the numbers reveals a big difference in their ability to stop the pass and get off the field these past three games. Take a look at some of these statistical changes...
Opponent Average Net Yards Passing
First 9 games: 166.3 ypg
Last 3 games: 298 ypg
Opponent Average Completion Percentage
First 9 games: 58.82%
Last 3 games: 71.28%
Opponent Passing First Downs
First 9 games: 8.2 per game
Last 3 games: 14.6 per game
Opponent Average Third Down Conversion Percentage
First 9 games: 33.39%
Last 3 games: 46.65%
All of this now begs the question: why has the Saints defense started to struggle with stopping the pass, especially now that they've got both their starting cornerbacks healthy again? Are the Saints simply facing better offenses and quality quarterbacks? And most importantly: will the defense and offense ever both play well in the same game?
105 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
A few theories
Based on memory, not research:
(1) Greer was one of the best 3 CBs in the league last year, not so much this year
(2) Turnovers haven’t been there. We’ve been unlucky recovering fumbles and haven’t been generating interceptions
(3) We haven’t faced any rookie QBs in a while
(4) Random variation
(5) Not enough swagger
(one of those was a joke)
Sure we did.
We faced three and lost against two.
Que sad face:
:( <— has a sad
"In fact, Sterger claims that, in one of the photos Favre allegedly sent her, he's masturbating — while wearing a pair of Crocs"
1. Lets be honest… Greer and Porter have played poorly the last 3 weeks.
2. Scott Shanle is one of the worse coverage LB’s in the NFL. I read a stat that he was the most targeted LB in the NFL and TE were averaging 9 yards a reception.
3. Outside of Vilma and Harper our other LB’s suck at blitzing…
4. Our front four is average.
by Mike Riley322 on Dec 6, 2010 10:44 AM CST reply actions 1 recs
Harper is a SS. But otherwise agreed (sorry for the nazi behavior)
Week 13 matchup: Bengals
Week 13 motto: Keep in the race, keep in the fight
Scott Shanle is one of the worse coverage LB’s in the NFL. I read a stat that he was the most targeted LB in the NFL and TE were averaging 9 yards a reception.
The first sentence may be perception, but it is not reality. The second sentence is a vicious smear.
If you’re going to make a reference, let’s see the reference. Especially on something as damning as this.
I want a short haired girl who sometimes wears it twice as long.
The difference between you and coldpizza is that coldpizza would say “Lunch Pale gives up an enormous amount of passing yards per reception.” Compare and contrast.
I want a short haired girl who sometimes wears it twice as long.
Moving between weakside and strongside this season after losing battery mate Scott Fujita(notes) to the Browns, Shanle has racked up the worst Stop Rate against the pass (19 percent) of any outside linebacker. Pass plays in his general direction have averaged 9.6 yards — we’re no math professors, but when you’re almost giving up a first down per play, that’s not good.
"Hey Peyton, I eat Oreos faster than you" - Scott Fujita
While i'm generally always in favor of posts that show the shortcomings of our good friend Lunch Pale
The opinion of the article as well as its stats lose a lot of credibility when it lists AJ Hawk on it’s no pro team for this year. While nobody will claim that he’s lived up to his draft status…pretty much everyone has been agreeing the AJ Hawk is having a very, very, very solid season and frankly his best as a pro.
"Aristotle was not Belgian. The central message of Buddhism is not 'every man for himself.' And the London Underground is not a political movement. Those are all mistakes, Otto. I looked 'em up."
But the stats quoted in the article aren't opinion, they're stats.
So, whether or not you agree with the comments on AJ Hawk aren’t really relevant.
by Stuart Carlton on Dec 6, 2010 12:58 PM CST up reply actions
And a nice stat it is, too
“Stop rate”…what is it? And where is it? There’s no link to a source, let alone an explanation.
It was worth the wait.
Football Outsiders
You can check out their website, (footballoutsiders.com) they use all sorts of complicated statistical methods that I don’t fully understand. But it makes for some really great analysis. I’m not sure if you can access individual defensive statistics without paying for a membership though…
"Hey Peyton, I eat Oreos faster than you" - Scott Fujita
yeah, they probably should have linked to an explanation
The stat comes from their game charters, in which people watch each game and mark down a bunch of crap about each play. The dataset that they’re building is quite impressive, and will eventually be quite useful.
(If I had access, that is :)
by Stuart Carlton on Dec 6, 2010 2:35 PM CST up reply actions
In other words
…it’s all subjective—just opinion with some numbers stapled on to make it look like science.
People, Football Outsiders is crap. They’re a bunch of stat geeks who think that numbers explain everything, and can’t even see that GIGO applies to any data, not just computer data. If you get to define what a “stop” is, all the numbers you juggle are nothing but special effects hokum designed to distract attention from the man behind the curtain: the Great and Powerful Preconceived Notion.
It was worth the wait.
by MtnExile on Dec 6, 2010 3:15 PM CST up reply actions 4 recs
We've disagreed about this before
So I won’t belabor the point and bore everybody, but you’re completely misrepresenting the work that the folks do at Football Outsiders.
(1) Their stats are as “objective” in all meaningful definitions of the word. Their DVOA model is based on a number of variables that were chosen to maximize it’s predictive and explanatory power. The variables in the DVOA formula are proprietary, but they weren’t picked out of thin air on a whim. They were picked to make DVOA as good a formula as possible. That’s an objective method, not a subjective one.
(2) No one believes that their stats explain everything. From their DVOA explained page: "In the aggregate, DVOA may not be quite as accurate as some of the other, similar “power ratings” formulas based on comparing drives rather than individual plays, but, unlike those other ratings, DVOA can be separated not only by player but also by down, or by week, or by distance needed for first down."
In other words, they specifically claim that DVOA doesn’t explain everything. There are always teams that seem to thwart the model, sometimes repeatedly so. That’s the way that statistics works: there are often outliers. That doesn’t mean the statistics are worthless.
So, while you may disagree with some of what they do (and I disagree with some of what they do…specifically the curse of 370 stuff), arguing against DVOA based on some vague idea that it’s subjective makes no sense because DVOA is not subjective.
by Stuart Carlton on Dec 6, 2010 5:38 PM CST up reply actions 2 recs
I think you confuse "objective" and "subjective"
When defining force, physicists don’t “choose” mass and acceleration, because they think that’s the best way to predict outcomes. They describe reality. That’s objective.
When defining DVOA—whatever the hell that stands for—FO chooses which stats they think are important. That’s subjective. It’s an opinion—no matter how much care they may take in selecting their criteria, or obscuring the nature of what they’re doing.
Besides, we were talking specifically about player ratings, so let’s stick with that. What stats do they have to go by in determining who is the best—or worst—outside linebacker? Tackles. Passes defensed. Interceptions, forced fumbles, fumbles recovered, etc. etc. But there are a lot of problems here. First of all, those are individual stats, and football is a team sport. How well any single player performs is often heavily conditioned by the play of those around him—for good or ill.
Second, it’s conditioned by scheme. Not only is it possible for one player to rank “below” another because of the base scheme used, it’s also possible for the player in question to be perfectly positioned according to the formation called by the defensive coordinator, and yet out of position for the actual offensive play. The result: “bad play” by defender.
There are other variables, too: health, weather, level of competition, even the score. A defense that plays a lot of prevent, because it tends to be winning at the end of games, tends to give up a lot of yardage (or misses a lot of “stops,” to put it another way) that are essentially meaningless.
So if Football Outsiders really wants to rate players, they’d have to come up with a “stop rate” that takes into account what the defense is willing to give up when ahead by 17 points with 1:13 left, the ball on the opponent’s 47, second and 8, and the snap taken by a pro bowl quarterback with two substitute wide receivers and a Hall of Fame-caliber tight end, while the defense is missing its starting strong safety, but its star defensive end is having his best game as a pro and already has 4 sacks. What, tell me now, is the strongside linebacker supposed to do under those circumstances? If you know, then you can construct a formula that begins to approach objectivity. If you don’t, your number juggling is just a glorified hobby.
It was worth the wait.
by MtnExile on Dec 6, 2010 9:06 PM CST up reply actions 1 recs
My last reply on this topic
You are 100% correct that statistical analysis of football is subject to way more error than experimental physics. However, if you think that fact renders statistical analysis useless, then I strongly feel you’re mistaken. However, we won’t agree on this topic, so I’ll leave it alone.
by Stuart Carlton on Dec 6, 2010 9:29 PM CST via mobile up reply actions
BOOM rec'd it
your number juggling is just a glorified hobby.
There is no comeback for this statement.
I want a short haired girl who sometimes wears it twice as long.
How about this?
Their record picking games against the spread this year, using DVOA and some adjustments for home field, weather, etc. are 106-80-6. Not bad for useless subjectivity, eh?
by Stuart Carlton on Dec 7, 2010 10:54 AM CST up reply actions
Yeah, except that it is
When picking every game against the spread, a 55% success rate is excellent.
Whatever. I appreciate the discussion, but it’s time for me to tip my hat and wish you well.
by Stuart Carlton on Dec 7, 2010 5:56 PM CST up reply actions
Pass plays in his general direction
“General”. Meaning, if you have a hard-on for Shanle like most guys here do, EVERY FREAKIN’ pass is credited to him whether he makes the tackle or not. Potentially. I’m sure it’s not, though, right? Because that wouldn’t be statistically accurate, right? And since they shared all their stats, it would be easy to check, transparency and all that, right?
Shanle’s no all-pro. But if he truly sucked big time, enough to KEEP THEM FROM WINNING THE SUPER BOWL, someone else would have his job. He was acquired in a low budget trade in 2006 (not like Jason David) so they’d have no issue with putting him on the bench if he disappointed. Oh, unless he has photos of Payton and Mickey doing something compromising. I’m sure that’s the REAL reason he’s starting.
I want a short haired girl who sometimes wears it twice as long.
Well said…although as usual in this argument people are forgetting one very, very, very important issue. As crappy as Shanle is….we can’t replace him….as we have nobody to fit the bill except for equally crappy players. Payloo and GW gambled on our young LBs to fight for a job….the only one that showed up….got put on IR before the season began. They guessed wrong.
"Aristotle was not Belgian. The central message of Buddhism is not 'every man for himself.' And the London Underground is not a political movement. Those are all mistakes, Otto. I looked 'em up."
that's a great point
It’s not Shanle vs. some Pro Bowler that we coulda had…it’s Shanle vs. whomever is on the street right now. I’ll take Shanle.
by Stuart Carlton on Dec 6, 2010 3:11 PM CST up reply actions
I know Shanle is our only choice.
I am not happy about it and being the only choice doesn’t mean he is good. He still is awful.
Vicious smear??? I didn't write the article...But I do watch Shanle get abused by opposing TE's weekly
The reference is listed below… thats where I read it… When teams have an 81% success rate thats a problem….
by Mike Riley322 on Dec 6, 2010 1:19 PM CST up reply actions
Shanle is the worst player on the defense.
That’s not a smear. That’s my opinion and it’s a commonly held believe nowadays.
it’s a commonly held believe nowadays.
True. Except by the Saints coaches, GM, and owners. 2006, 2007. 2008. 2009. 2010.
2011 = Free Agent and I think they’ll bring him back.
“F*** ALL Y’ALL!!!”

I want a short haired girl who sometimes wears it twice as long.
1. Lets be honest… Greer and Porter have played poorly the last 3 weeks.
The touchdown Terrell Owens scored on a crossing pattern in the left corner of the end zone was only the second TD allowed by Jabari Greer this season.
Ring the bells that still can ring. Forget your perfect offering. There is a crack in everything. That's how the light gets in.
I'm noticing a few things here
We’re not doing great against the run. If you noticed yesterday, there were some 3rd and 10 yds plus that were converted from Cincy. 2-3 on 4th down conv. The defense is on the field way too long.
Greer and Porter are not playing like they played last season. Lack of pressure on the QB.
Your one and only..Professional Sports Blogger!
This is the main question for me
Are the Saints simply facing better offenses and quality quarterbacks?
I think this has a lot to do with it.
"As soon as Tony (Dungy) said we had no chance, I knew we had 'em right where we wanted 'em"--Coach Sean Payton right after Super Bowl XLIV with the Lombardi Trophy firmly in hand. WHO DAT!!
by David "Satch" Kelly on Dec 6, 2010 10:49 AM CST reply actions
I also do.
and while I admit it seems that Porter and Greer aren’t playing up to the level I’d expect I think it’s a stretch to say the’ve been playing “bad”. I don’t really pay enough attention but I think our secondary is a little different this year correct? I mean, who is our nickel corner? Patrick Robinson? Leigh Torrence? Usama Young? I think I’ve seen them all play it.
Malcolm Jenkins starting I think is a big difference too. Not saying he isn’t doing well, I think he is coming along awesome. But, he does take some bad angles still, misreads routes and lanes… all in all I’d say that has to make it tougher for our DB’s.
Honestly though, I don’t think I’m worried about it much. The quality of our last couple opponent’s passing game is top notch. Also, I think as our offense is turning it on, it’s forcing our opponents into more passing situations. If I’m worried about anything it’s our developing tendency to try and give games away in the second half (where did that come from?).
Maybe this is a rookie statement based off of what you said
Could it be stamina? Are there statistics for average offensive time of play on the field per game versus defensive (if that makes sense)? Did we run the ball more the first half of the season because Brees wasn’t firing on all cylinders or we faced teams with poor run defense?
I might be way off here but point being now that Brees is moving things more quickly down the field and Ivory has found his stride defense is on the field more and as the season pushes on they can’t handle it. Yes? No?
Breesus Is My Homeboy
by SarahT on Dec 7, 2010 2:36 PM CST via mobile up reply actions
You and Satch had it partly right
We’re definitely facing better QB play, which is what is skewing the numbers. However, a large part doesn’t have to do with Greer and Porter at all. The fact is, is that all you can ask of your cornerbacks is to stay with a player for 3-4 seconds and keep it tight. You can’t expect corners to cover forever. We could have Mel Blount and Rod Woodson back there and they’d be struggling at the moment. Why?….no pass rush.
QBs have an eternity to pass against us at the moment. You can’t expect to give QBs 5 seconds plus constantly. When we send in a blitz, it still gets picked up. Outside of Ellis, who should never be relied upon to be a pass rusher as an interior lineman, our pass rush has been terrible this year. We get no consistent pressure. Without that help, our secondary will naturally struggle, it’s simply the way the game works. In addition, without that speed and athleticism at OLB our blitz packages struggle to get to the QB as well. There’s a reason the only time we get pressure on blitzes is with Harper or Vilma instead of our OLBs. We have got to get younger, faster and more athletic at those positions or we’ll be wasting 2 of the better CBs we’ve had in our history. Our DBs are deep…but nobody can cover forever.
"Aristotle was not Belgian. The central message of Buddhism is not 'every man for himself.' And the London Underground is not a political movement. Those are all mistakes, Otto. I looked 'em up."
Makes a lot more sense when you remember that will smith had a career year last year.
Week 13 matchup: Bengals
Week 13 motto: Keep in the race, keep in the fight
by Jon Banks on Dec 6, 2010 1:21 PM CST via mobile up reply actions
Please proofread, Dave
There are some ugly its/it’s errors.
(uncomfortable silence in the audience, some clearing of throats….)
I want a short haired girl who sometimes wears it twice as long.
(ha!)
"In fact with that article from today that had him real lean and everything, I think I’m going to play him at corner this week in place of Tracy Porter."-Greg Williams in refefernce to Sedrick Ellis
I don't think you need the , in that situation but i could be wrong
Superbowl bound!!!...I know! do you?! Go Saints!!
Greer and Porter can only do what they do best...
.. if the opposite QB gets pressured “meanigfully” which it hasnt happened much as of late
Anyone wants to join me on the empty bandwagon....
one kind of obvious reason behind the defensive change is...
that when the other team scores defensive TD’s because you fumbled/int (for example the arizone/cleveland) game. It leaves your offense on the field adn kind of alters the stats, its the same reason why san diego’s D was so inflated they had a ton of blocked punts and To’s that cost them early in the season and made them have the #1 D. i know your D has to be pretty good still and it can’t be all that but i bet it plays a big role if someone wanted to take the time to look it up. you’ll also notice are big plays have been coming back in the last three games on offense meaning they are scoring more quickly and getting off the field faster.
I never thought I would see the day where a New Orleans Saints team would be 9-3
And everyone would gripe about how bad they are. This is a self forfilling prophecy waiting to happen
We can't win at home. We can't win on the road. I just can't figure out where else to play!
-- Pat Williams
by Fat Punk Kicker on Dec 6, 2010 12:39 PM CST reply actions 1 recs
what you said
"In fact with that article from today that had him real lean and everything, I think I’m going to play him at corner this week in place of Tracy Porter."-Greg Williams in refefernce to Sedrick Ellis
i'm being silenced! lol
"In fact with that article from today that had him real lean and everything, I think I’m going to play him at corner this week in place of Tracy Porter."-Greg Williams in refefernce to Sedrick Ellis
Btw
Good job, you have been doing better with the kicks. Work on the kickoffs and we’re gravy.
Week 13 matchup: Bengals
Week 13 motto: Keep in the race, keep in the fight
by Jon Banks on Dec 6, 2010 1:23 PM CST via mobile up reply actions
Better yet...
give up your position on kickoffs so Morstead can start kicking them again.
Wanna say something? Sign up! It's free!
by Dave Cariello on Dec 6, 2010 1:27 PM CST up reply actions
We held an bacon eating contest at the beginning of the year to see who would do the kick offs
I won by a mile and I won’t be giving it up untill someone else can topple me.
We can't win at home. We can't win on the road. I just can't figure out where else to play!
-- Pat Williams
by Fat Punk Kicker on Dec 6, 2010 2:30 PM CST up reply actions 1 recs
Bwahahaha!
Wanna say something? Sign up! It's free!
by Dave Cariello on Dec 6, 2010 4:27 PM CST up reply actions
It's funny now....til you realize this inevitably will mean that Remi Ayodele will be kicking off soon.
"Aristotle was not Belgian. The central message of Buddhism is not 'every man for himself.' And the London Underground is not a political movement. Those are all mistakes, Otto. I looked 'em up."
Chase Daniel has been practicing for it.
Week 13 matchup: Bengals
Week 13 motto: Keep in the race, keep in the fight
LOL!!
Wanna say something? Sign up! It's free!
by Dave Cariello on Dec 6, 2010 1:27 PM CST up reply actions
I say timing and also look at the time of the season
Every team we’re going to face, no matter if they’re cellar dwellers or not, are going to fight hard this time of year. There’s no question that teams no matter what record have something to prove. The Bengals almost beat us, maybe one of their reasons was that they are currently a bad team and the media is eating them alive. A win would’ve been a big confidence booster.
The schedule is only going to get tougher. We play the Rams (who are fighting for 1st place); we play the Ravens (also fighting for 1st place); we face the Falcons (winner determines 1st place); and then the Bucs (winner could determine Wild Card).
It’s simply the time of year where teams, no matter good or stinky, are going to fight tooth and nail down to the wire for respect. Either that or some key players are beginning to wear down. Why is Greer slowing down at some points? (TO can’t be covered in the end zone?) Why does Jahri Evans continue to rack up holding penalties? Why can’t we tackle better? Why is our kicking/punting teams letting our opponents gain more yardage?
Maybe we should tighten up some gears here and there. Too many close wins. That offsides on 4th and 2 was luck.
And most importantly: will the defense and offense ever both play well in the same game?
Yes…in Dallas.
It was worth the wait.
Our defense played well in Dallas?
"Aristotle was not Belgian. The central message of Buddhism is not 'every man for himself.' And the London Underground is not a political movement. Those are all mistakes, Otto. I looked 'em up."
Roll all you want. We gave up 460 yards of total offense, allowed a 47% third down conversion rate, 4.5 yards per rush, gave up a 66% redzone conversion rate and lost by 10 minutes in the time of possession. One good defensive play in the final minutes…does not mean our defense played well.
"Aristotle was not Belgian. The central message of Buddhism is not 'every man for himself.' And the London Underground is not a political movement. Those are all mistakes, Otto. I looked 'em up."
“…will the defense and offense ever both play well in the same game?”
This is Dave’s question. I quoted it. It was posed today, addressing the future. What city is the Super Bowl being played in?
It was worth the wait.
Gotcha.
I apologize for not following the analogy correctly. I’ll keep my fingers crossed that your prognostication comes through.
"Aristotle was not Belgian. The central message of Buddhism is not 'every man for himself.' And the London Underground is not a political movement. Those are all mistakes, Otto. I looked 'em up."
And toes
And any other appendages. Because, truth be told, it may be just wishful thinking.
It was worth the wait.
Well there’s nothing wrong with losing if you play well and simply get beat in a great game by a potentially better team. You just don’t want to go out like the Vikings did last year. You don’t want to go out playing flat and like crap. As long as that doesn’t happen….no regrets.
"Aristotle was not Belgian. The central message of Buddhism is not 'every man for himself.' And the London Underground is not a political movement. Those are all mistakes, Otto. I looked 'em up."
Maybe in the first half
Breesus Is My Homeboy
by SarahT on Dec 7, 2010 2:40 PM CST via mobile up reply actions
i think yesterday that it was the playcalling
On 4th down GW seemed to put us into man to man coverage and back our corners off. Our corners haven’t been playing extremely well(especially Greer) and we’re not generating a good enough pass rush. I think those are the elements to our decline atm. Hopefully it will all come together around playoff time when it needs to.
Superbowl bound!!!...I know! do you?! Go Saints!!
SPECIAL TEAMS!!!!
ST have been horrid ALL year, putting our D in terrible field position. Did Cincy ever start their drives further than their own 40?!?!?! While certainly not the only reason for a questionable D performance, it doesn’t help that the opponent’s O only has to drive half the field to score!!!!
/frustration with Greg Mac(not the)Mahon
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qais_eGMnWk
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=39GH-nzrY_I&feature=relatde
Special Teams should be the priority this week to fix
there is no reason we can’t at least put on a medium level special teams performance, not like yesterday which was bad.
If Pro is the opposite of Con, what is the opposite of Progress? Congress!
-Men's Restroom - House of Representatives, Washington, DC
I think if we hadn't had that penalty on 4th down with 12 men on the field
the game would have been much different and we’d be looking at the defense’s performance on Sunday in a different light. We probaly would have held them to 19 or 22 pts. We would have had the ball with 10 minutes left in the game and an 8 pt lead and the momentum. The momentum switched at that penalty.
Our whole performance could be improved hugely if we cleaned up the penalties. If we had only half the penaties, we would have dominated this game. Ironically we won in large part becuase of their offside penalty.
If Pro is the opposite of Con, what is the opposite of Progress? Congress!
-Men's Restroom - House of Representatives, Washington, DC
let's not discuss it
"But tonight the Superbowl belongs to the City of New Orleans" - Roger Goodell 2/7/2010
You drafted VY didn't you?
Week 14 matchup: Rams
Week 14 motto: My kingdom for special teams coverage.
can't remember, but I think so
believe me when I tell you, that’s been the least of my issues
"But tonight the Superbowl belongs to the City of New Orleans" - Roger Goodell 2/7/2010
Time on field.
First of all in the begining our offense was struggling to drive down the field using a lot of the clock and once getting in the rezone were letting penalties, sacks, fumbles and interceptions negate the drives but our defense was relatively rested and able to cover their backs. Now we are make absurdly fast drives down the field. Abet having to settle for field goals more than last year but still not eating up much of the clock and putting the defense back on the field much quicker and more often. This in itself will give the oponents more opportunitines and wear down our defense. Even before the other offense teams were able to drive down the field fairly regularly but our defense goal line stance was superior and often limited them to 3 points. As our running game comes back stronger and more consistantly our defense should be better able to return to form and if we can eat up more clock the other teams will have less oportunties to expose our weaknesses, and yes we have some, but then everyone does which is why so much time is spend studying game tape.
When I say WHO DAT U say TWO DAT!!!
by cajuncommando58 on Dec 6, 2010 10:40 PM CST reply actions
That's exactly what Drew said post-game
So I guess great minds think alike, eh?
Had to go to work
Had to go to work after game didn’t get to hear Drew after the game but yeah I guess (I don’t know about great in my case) like minds think alike.
When I say WHO DAT U say TWO DAT!!!
by cajuncommando58 on Dec 7, 2010 1:46 AM CST up reply actions
Protip
If you score more, you give the opposing offense more chances to score in turn. We can’t blow every team out 34-3. The more opportunities a team has, the higher the probability that they will score.
You can’t have your cake and eat it too.
"In fact, Sterger claims that, in one of the photos Favre allegedly sent her, he's masturbating — while wearing a pair of Crocs"
1. Less frequent blitz plays called by GW has shown up the front 4’s inability to pressure opposing QB’s, while appearing to help stop the run.
2. Two out of three Saints linebackers are slower than most, poor in coverage and … generally unspectacular – trying to put it politely so Stu doesn’t jump down my throat.
3. DB’s are forced to do more work because of both of the above, meaning on their off days, the whole defense looks poor.
If I am good I could add years to my life / I would rather add some life to my years.
Two out of three Saints linebackers are slower than most, poor in coverage and … generally unspectacular –
I, and apparently GDub, Payton, and Loomis, prefer to think of those two as “serviceable”.
What kills me is all the fawning over Drew Brees, contrasted with the damning of 2 of the 3 linebackers. In my mind, Brees ain’t THAT good and the 2 ain’t THAT bad, and the standings/results reflect that.
You say you'll change the constitution
Well you know, we all want to change your head
here's how I know Shanle is THAT bad
In two years under GW’s blitz-happy, ball-hawking defense, Shanle has zero sacks, one forced fumble, and three blocked passes (none this year). Three passes defensed in 24 games! Former Saint Rob Ninkovich has five in the same time span, and he wasn’t even a starter until this year. Brian Cushing, whom the Saints passed on in 2009, had 4 sacks and 10 passes defensed (with 4 INTS) in his rookie year alone. Don’t tell me the Saints haven’t had opportunities to upgrade that position.
As far as the coaches praise – do you really think they are going to publicly berate one of the veterans on the team and admit their own mistake in not replacing him?
GW’s defense isn’t exactly blitz-happy this season.
Stu, serviceable is a word we can agree upon. We can get by with them. It doesn’t mean I’d like to see them stay starters next season.
If I am good I could add years to my life / I would rather add some life to my years.
Well that’s what everybody said LAST season. And they drafted Patrick Robinson!!! GAAA!! Get your Maalox ready for 2011.
You say you'll change the constitution
Well you know, we all want to change your head
chemistry
I’m wondering if the fall off in the defense has anything to do with chemistry. The secondary has seen a lot of different players in different positions the last few weeks. That has to affect the practice sessions and how guys play together during the game.
The level of competition is a tempting excuse, but I think inaccurate. The Falcons and Steelers are two of the best teams in the in the league, and neither put up exceptional offensive numbers against the Saints (Falcons had less than 350 total yards in regulation). Ryan had 228 yards on 63% completions, and Roethlisberger had 195 yards on 61% completions. All three QBs since the bye have had much better numbers.
The lack of a pass rush has been a problem all year, so I don’t think that can really be the cause of recent performances either.
I do think the return of the big plays and fast scoring is part of it, but that can’t tell the whole story. The Saints may not have been doing a lot of that earlier in the year, but it was happening, and the defense didn’t seem to suffer because of it.
Team and unit chemistry is impossible to quantify and hard to identify, but I think it’s probably the single biggest factor. The good news is that it should improve over the next month.
Interesting
While I’m not a big “chemistry” guy, I do think it plays a role.
Honest question: Why do you think chemistry will improve over the next month? Because our once-injured players will have had more time to practice together?
by Stuart Carlton on Dec 7, 2010 8:36 AM CST up reply actions
While I’m not a big "chemistry" guy
Not sure what you mean – you failed organic chemistry? If you mean you don’t think it’s important and helpful to have the same guys playing together week in and week out, learning each others tendencies, strengths and weaknesses, you’re crazy.
I think it will improve because the same starters will continue to practice and play together. They learn how each other react in given situations. A lot of that learning is instinctual, and has little to do with Xs and Os. It’s like any other coordinated athletic endeavor. The same can be said of basketball players and paired ice skaters. The more you do it together, they better you get at it together.
I agree with all of that
And think chemistry does play a role in team quality (which is what I said). I just think talent plays a bigger role.
And, no, I didn’t fail organic chemistry. I changed majors to avoid taking it :)
by Stuart Carlton on Dec 7, 2010 9:22 AM CST up reply actions

by 


























