Game Balls of the Week: Chris Ivory and Sean Payton
**This post is sponsored by Sprint.**
Each time I have to write one of these I always try to do something different and unique to keep things interesting and fresh. Originally I was going to give it to Sean Payton this week, an unconventional choice since he didn't actually play in the game. But I'll be damned if Chris Ivory hasn't been tearing it up lately on the field and deserves to be mentioned in this post. So this week I'm going to give out two game balls. That's right! Two balls, right before your eyes and all for your reading enjoyment. How's that for shaking things up? Can you handle two huge balls this morning?
The real game ball has got to go to Chris Ivory. For the second week in a row he's up for nomination as the NFL's rookie of the week thanks to his performance against the Bengals. Go vote, people! Just in case you live in a cave, here is a statistical reminder of just how beastly Chris Ivory ran the ball on Sunday...
Good week to be starting him on your fantasy football team. [pats self on back] After going quite a while without a touchdown, Ivory has scored five in the last three games. Grandmaster Wang said it himself: It's official. Chris Ivory is "The Guy." Deal with it.
It's obvious Payton is trusting Ivory and the running game more as of late, but how come he never gets used as a receiver on screen passes or coming out of the backfield? Ivory has only one reception, made in the game against Tampa Bay. But it went for 17 yards! Perhaps his hands really are an issue but I would love to see what else 'Tusk' can do.
As for Payton, I thought he did a superb job on Sunday, most notably the decision to run the fake snap and draw the Bengals offsides. Plus, it's his reputation as a wild man that helps sell the play. Payton is just crazy enough to go for the seven instead of three. And as mentioned earlier, I like what I'm seeing from his playcalling and his willingness to stick with the run.
He's also in the lead so far for my Most Improved award. Coach has successfully challenged six plays out of a possible eight so far this season, giving him a 75% success rate and making him top five in the league. To put that vast improvement in perspective, Payton has never eclipsed a 33.33% success rate the past three years and never the 50% mark as a head coach. Keep up the good work!
And lastly, I've got to tip my hat to Coach Payton for finally putting together two Saints winning seasons since Jim Mora in 1991-1992. And since it looks like the team will probably make the playoffs again this year, I'd also like to express my gratitude to him for avoiding a Super Bowl hangover, saving us fans all a lot of embarrassment/ridicule and not letting the Saints become yet another championship team to completely flop the following season.
And for letting us all enjoy this a little longer. It's a good time to be a Saints fan.
22 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Dave, you're a cyber flasher!
I can’t find a problem with your balls this morning. They both look pretty good. It’s going to be very interesting to see how RB touches get split up this week, since it looks like PT will finally be returning to the lineup. I wonder if I should start PT on my fantasy team this week in round 1 of the playoffs. Probably not, but I don’t have any better options at the Fleaflicker league. I’ll have to risk it.
Tusk’s ball security issues (he fumbled yet again last week) and his non-use in the passing/screen pass plays may mean he and PT may get a more even split of touches this week while Reggie gets his usual amount and Jones only comes in for relief duties.
I agree that Payton also deserves a game ball. I’m glad he’s our coach. When he resolves whatever problem is causing the team to blow leads in the 2nd half, I’ll love him even more.
"As soon as Tony (Dungy) said we had no chance, I knew we had 'em right where we wanted 'em"--Coach Sean Payton right after Super Bowl XLIV with the Lombardi Trophy firmly in hand. WHO DAT!!
by David "Satch" Kelly on Dec 8, 2010 10:29 AM CST reply actions
Regarding Tusk and PT
For a long time I’ve foreseen Reggie eventually moving into a larger role. But with the emergence of Ivory, and if Pierre comes back as strong as before, and if the Saints re-sign him, I think that’s going to be it for Reggie. Decoy value or no, getting five touches a game is absurd at his salary; and if that’s all they ever mean to give him, it’s time to spend that money on a couple good linebackers, instead.
Mike Bell was never a threat to bring about this kind of scenario. Chris Ivory is.
It was worth the wait.
sorry...but you've got the wrong person moving out. No way Payton gives up his favorite non-effective playtoy in Reggie. Byebye PT.
"Aristotle was not Belgian. The central message of Buddhism is not 'every man for himself.' And the London Underground is not a political movement. Those are all mistakes, Otto. I looked 'em up."
I can see either or both going
This is the NFL and it may sound dumb now but both could be gone I mean think about it: does Reggie want to continue getting 5 touches a game? Mr. One of the Best College Careers ever and still hasn’t lived up to it (or had a real chance with injuries and etc.,)? And PT was hungry for more lucci during the offseason, you think he’ll chill now? Especially if he comes back and is solid. Somebody will pick him up.
2010 is cuzzin's breakout year...run with that chip bruh!
I can see Payton giving up Reggie
You forget how large egos tend to work. “I’m the one who makes this offense run, not Reggie. I can do without him.” I think Drew is the only one Payton believes he couldn’t—or wouldn’t want to—do without.
Besides, there’s also Loomis, who is technically Payton’s boss. If Loomis wants to re-sign Pierre, and the money’s good, Pierre will sign. If he wants Reggie to take a big pay cut, and Reggie balks, aloha Reggie. Between Chris Ivory and Pierre Thomas, don’t you think the Saints’ offense could continue to flourish? Probably Payton does too…because it’s all down to him, anyway.
It was worth the wait.
Agreed...
I don’t think Reggie is the “golden child” that people think Payton makes him to be. If he was, we would’ve seen him get more carries in the Superbowl, or in the first two games of the season, when he was healthy. Wouldn’t surprise me at all. $11 million is a lot to give up for someone you’re barely using. I honestly thought this would’ve happened last year. IMO, Reggie should want to be more integral or leave. Not saying he isn’t a team player but at some point you have to be true to you and if you feel your not able to contribute like you know you can at your job. Or in other words, if you’re barely being utilized when you know you should be maximized, then I don’t judge him for it. Gonna be an interesting off-season…
2010 is cuzzin's breakout year...run with that chip bruh!
Payton has already said...
that Ivory’s workload will not be decreased EVEN WITH Thomas’ return. He realizes the hot hand is one to go with and Thomas would only be eased in anyway. At least for this week. Thomas is missed in the screen game for sure, but as far as having a runner to go between the tackles is concerned, Ivory now is indeed, “The Guy”. That being said, I think AT LEAST Thomas is gone next year and possibly both him and Reggie alike. I’d hate to see either in other teams’ colors, but it is what it is.
As far as the Rams game goes though, St. Louis has allowed only FIVE rushing touchdowns all year. Pretty crazy feat for the once recent bottom dweller. Hopefully Ivory and Co. can continue to do on the ground, what Brees and Co. does through the air while Vilma and Co. knock Bradford around with some “Remember Me” hits.
Don't eat the cheese
Um.....
Most everyone I heard from who actually saw the game seemed to feel it was Payton’s exceptionally bad play calling in the third quarter that allowed the Bengals back in the game to begin with.
"Aristotle was not Belgian. The central message of Buddhism is not 'every man for himself.' And the London Underground is not a political movement. Those are all mistakes, Otto. I looked 'em up."
They're just unhappy with the passes in the red zone
they’ll get over it.
Wanna say something? Sign up! It's free!
by Dave Cariello on Dec 8, 2010 11:02 AM CST up reply actions
“Most everyone I heard from who actually saw the game seemed to feel it was Payton’s exceptionally bad play calling in the third quarter that allowed the Bengals back in the game to begin with.”
Was it the 11-play drive (6 rushes, 5 passes) that resulted in a (rushing) touchdown to put them up 20-6 that they objected to?
Or was it the 3-play drive (1 rush, 2 passes) that ended with an INT intended for a wide open Colston that 9 times out of 10 goes for 40+ yards at least, and quite possibly a TD, if Drew hadn’t overthrown it and/or the wind hadn’t caught it and made it sail?
by Grandmaster Wang on Dec 8, 2010 12:33 PM CST up reply actions
Reggie Bush, Reggie Bush, Reggie Bush,......................Decoy?
We have won without him and will continue to do so. Lance Moore does as good a job for a lot less and if they would let Ivory have a few screens, he would make everyone forget about Reggie Bush. Not only would he be better but he would hurt people running down field instead of heading for the sidelines. Reggie is not built for NFL punishment (too fragile and injury prone). How many yards would Ivory have if he had 25 touches a game. I see Ivory getting atleast 1000 yards this season in a part time roll. I say make him the feature back and let him run, like Adrien Peterson, Morirs Jones Drew, Steven Jackson ect. I get chills thinking about it………….
My Magnificent Black and Gold Warriors
"instead of heading for the sidelines"
That’s so 2008 man! Reggie’s been pounding fools the last couple years, running north and etc., but you forget, we are a passing team, nobody’s gonna get 25 touches ( or carries). What makes Reggie fragile really? Name his injuries? You can only name two. A mishandled knee and a broken fib. Other than that, no concussions, no twisted ankles, no bad shoulders, not bad ribs, nothing of that nature. PT is the one that’s injury prone. Sure he’s not a pounder but the whole “he’s too little” crap is a horrible misconception fed to the masses. He’s the same size or bigger than Lesean McCoy and Chris Johnson and to be honest I don’t even know who this dude (Bush) is in the NFL. The last 3 years have all been injury filled (A knee he should’ve had surgery on from the get-go) And his first year he shared with Deuce. Not really much to judge. And when he’s in, he’s averaged less than 10 carries a game. All I have to judge Reggie by, as far as what he can do well, is games like the one against AZ last year and the beginning of 2008 when he was leading the league in scoring and keeping us in games until our defense lost it for us. But he was getting touches then but even then, we were pass-happy and our line sucked! So yeah, let Ivory do his thang, he’s hot! But we’ve been here before. PT was this guy the last couple years. And I heard the same type of praises… Next year, if Ivory gets hurt some other guy will come in and people will say, “he’s the perfect blend of Ivory, PT and Reggie…” It’s the NFL, a lot has to do with timing and chance too. Skill and Talent are huge but sometimes people end up in situations where that talent and skill just doesn’t cut it. QB’s are the perfect example of this. Some star Rookie QB’s come in and end up on a horrible team with no pass-protection and no great receivers. They lose their confidence—due to getting sacked so much and throwing picks. Next thing you know, they’re benched, hurt and/or shipped elsewhere only to end up out of the NFL within 5 years. But other’s end up on teams with a somewhat better chance (maybe the receivers are average but they have a decent line) and they are able to maintain that swagger they came out of college with. They get a star receiver (or make one) and boom, they live up to the bill. This happens year after year all over the NFL and not just to QB’s but RB’s, receivers and etc., A lot has to do with timing and chance. And now that I think about it, a lot has to do with coaching and management. Some of these coaches and general managers plug a player in and don’t see how the player isn’t producing is directly linked to player not being set up for victory (offensive-line, receivers, adequate carries, play-calling). Bush in my opinion, may have already been out of the NFL on some teams (or at least seriously considered a major bust which is merely a debate now) and on others he may be the best back in the league or at least living up to his draft status, who knows. Just crack through all the crap and consider all the evidence, which in Bush’s case who knows what he can really be since we haven’t seen him play a full season since 06’ and we haven’t seen him get into a groove as a RB in a game because he’ll get a carry take it for 10 yards then get pulled.
2010 is cuzzin's breakout year...run with that chip bruh!
by TAYDIGGA on Dec 8, 2010 3:22 PM CST reply actions 2 recs
my bad though...
definitely in need of some space in all that crap…was rushing.
2010 is cuzzin's breakout year...run with that chip bruh!
It has "a lot to do with timing and chance, too."
Totally agree. Being in the right place at the right time is often a major determining factor for anyone’s success in their chosen career, including football players. In the age of 24/7 over-analyzation of sports, this fact sometimes gets overlooked.
I also agree that Reggie has been used too sparingly for anyone to really know for certain what might have been under different circumstances.
Ivory may be the answer to our rushing game for years to come. And maybe, he won’t. But, thus far, you have to give the guy a lot of credit for taking advantage of his opportunity of being in the right place at the right time.
yeah
Ivory has been a beast. I’m trying to figure out who he reminds me of…
2010 is cuzzin's breakout year...run with that chip bruh!
Predator..........................The movie with Arnold Schwartznager
Dreads and high cheek bones and them damn eyes………………….Oooooooooo !!! Scary
My Magnificent Black and Gold Warriors
Calm down Tay......................
Here’s your reason why he’s pulled…………….Running east and west. I will admit he has run better in a couple of games this year but ……………….The half dozen plays and two punt returns in six years are not justifiable for the price in my book. Beside, you said (Quote) he has not played a whole season since 06.
My Magnificent Black and Gold Warriors

by 































