Ray Edwards
As we've seen lately, the Saints have been looking for some help at defensive help. Mainly looking at old guys that played for the Rams last season, to be more accurate. Those two guys are James Hall and Leonard Little, and while both of them would be solid pickups as rotational linemen, I'm not so sure it really answers our HUGE question at who will start opposite Will Smith next season. One name has been floating around cyberspace though, and it's Ray Edwards. The Vikings only tendered him with a first round pick, and honestly I think that's a bargain for him. More after the jump.
via cdn.bleacherreport.com
Ray Edwards had a pretty solid regular season, not exactly stunning or great, but it wasn't bad. A notable stat on Edwards though is what he did in the post season. In one game against the Cowboys in the Divisional Round of the NFC Playoffs, Edwards lit up lil' Tony Romo THREE times. Now I do understand that the Cowboy's line isn't exactly the best, but they're not that bad and Edwards really let the hammer down in that game. The next week he came down into our house and dropped Drew Brees once, which is by no means an easy task. It seemed like when it mattered, Edwards turned it on and let loose the dogs. The interesting thing is this quote he had from an interview back in February:
"[Coach Brad Childress] actually said, basically just to be blunt, that they were going to tender me. 'I know it's not the raise you're looking for, but basically there's nothing you can do about it.' I mean, he's right because if another team doesn't value my talents and what I can do, that's basically what it is."
Does that mean that the Vikings aren't all that high on Ray, and would be willing to let him go simply for a first rounder? If I were the Saints, and I saw quite what may or may not be available at the 32nd pick in the draft, I'd pull the trigger and sign this guy to an offer sheet.
The 6'5" 260-pounder is only 25 and still has an immense amount of potential. He may have started to truly realize what he had under the hood in the playoffs last season, and coming to a team that has proven they can get there and win it, he may actually like the idea of playing here. He's about three years older than most rookies, but he's undoubtedly got the same amount of potential as most, and on top of that he has a decent body of work thus far. Of course all of this is speculative, and more likely than not he'll be back in Minnesota, where Brett Favre plans on leading his team to yet another season that ends in heartbreak. I honestly think that if Favre leaves, it'll be his fault they do poorly, and if he stays it'll be his fault once again. So, how about it? Ray Edwards anyone?
This FanPost was written by a reader and member of Canal Street Chronicles. It does not necessarily reflect the views of CSC and its staff or editors.
44 comments
|
1 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Is he worth...
a 1st rounder??? I just don’t know… he had a lot of help on the DL
With the 32nd pick of the 2010 NFL Draft, the New Orleans Saints take... The suspense is killing me!
Exactly. I'd rather use the draft pick.
rotoworld.com:
Ray Edwards-DL- Vikings Mar. 11 – 9:05 pm et
The Delaware County Times expects the Eagles to pursue Vikings restricted free agent DE Ray Edwards. The Eagles are unlikely to part with the necessary first-round pick to land Edwards with an expensive offer sheet, but they could explore trade talks with the Vikings. Though Edwards was expected to draw interest after a monster postseason effort, he’s been far from elite among pass rushers the past few seasons. The Saints are also said to be interested in Edwards.
I'm a faker, a paper clown
But
Will there be any guys left at the 32 spot that are worth it? If Carlos Dunlap or Everson Griffen are there, then maybe so, but odds are that neither of those guys will be there for us.
I wouldn't mind getting half the "love" that the Saints are willing to give Sharper...
Will there be any guys left at the 32 spot that are worth it?
Plenty. The crack staff at 5800 Airline Drive have real value picks lined up for every round. It’ll be a turkey shoot.
I'm a faker, a paper clown
bad joke coming
“Crack” staff? do we have a “quaaludes” staff and “marijuana” staff members, too? Can i be VP of “Abita Amber” staff department?
And when’s the annual turkey shoot? Hopefully not after we’ve all loaded up on our departmental vices…
"I have all of the love in the world for Darren Sharper. I just don't have all the money in the world for Darren Sharper." Mickey Loomis
Players taken at 32 the past ten years
2009: Evander ‘Ziggy’ Hood
2008: Phillip Merling
2007: Anthony Gonzalez
2006: Mathias Kiwanuka
2005: Logan Mankins
2004: Benjamin Watson
2003: Tyler Brayton
2002: Patrick Ramsey
2001: Todd Heap
2000: Trung Canidate
Hmmm…a few keepers, but a few clunkers as well. Sounds like a typical draft slot to me. But consider the players taken shortly afterwards who subsequently proved they were worthy of a higher pick:
Kyle Vanden Bosch
Chad Johnson
Andre Gurode
Clinton Portis
Anquan Boldin
Bob Sanders
DeMeco Ryans
…and of course, Mr. 33 Himself, Drew Brees.
"Time you enjoy wasting, was not wasted.." --J.O.L.
good listing, M-E
gets me excited that no matter who we pick, we’ll have a few months of envisioning them having a HUGE impact before they actually step on the field for live action in September…
"I have all of the love in the world for Darren Sharper. I just don't have all the money in the world for Darren Sharper." Mickey Loomis
That brings up an interesting point...
IMHO, the draft is a crap shoot.
There are hundreds and hundreds of examples; like, how the heck did all 32 teams pass on Tom Brady FIVE TIMES – many 6 times???
-
Here’s one that’s not quite that extreme…
Rd Sel # Player Position
1 9 Chris Claiborne OLB
1 28 Andy Katzenmoyer MLB
1 31 Al Wilson MLB
2 35 Barry Gardner OLB
2 36 Mike Peterson OLB
2 45 Rahim Abdullah OLB
2 51 Johnny Rutledge LB
3 73 Joey Porter LB
Joey Porter was the 8th LB selected that year. I’d bet that at least 5 of those teams are kicking themselves for not drafting him… and another dozen or so that had an LB need but drafted other positions above pick 73.
-
Ray Edwards is another example… taken with the 127th pick in the 2006 draft, he was the 17th defensive lineman (9th DE) taken.
I’d rather a “sure thing”, or at least a “much much more probably thing”, over a “crap shoot” any day… but that’s just me.
Pigs have flown! Hell has frozen over! The Saints HAVE WON the Superbowl!!
Young proven DE.... against unproven rookie and 32nd player in draft.....
I say" hook em up". The Dude could end up being a Monster under GW’S system. Our 32nd pick is nothing more than the first pick in the second round and we already have a second round pick. Atleast with Ray Edwards, you know what your getting and a lot less money than a first round pick……………..Just me………….
My Magnificent Black and Gold Warriors
by saint-sly on Mar 12, 2010 7:19 PM CST reply actions 1 recs
Wouldn't that make
our second round pick just the 1st pick of the 3rd round?
"Everyone has a plan 'till they get punched in the mouth." --Mike Tyson
Only if it's the last pick in the second round...........I say,,,,,,,,,,
go for a sure thang that has NFL experience, Edwards has already had the rookie knocked out of him.
My Magnificent Black and Gold Warriors
by saint-sly on Mar 12, 2010 8:11 PM CST up reply actions 1 recs
He is not worth a low one
Or a high two. He is at best a low second or high third in value. He was protected by strong tackle play by the Williams boys. He is not a great pass rusher, which is what the Saints need. Frankly I like Little from the Rams, he is more than proven and he has suffered in the 3-4 and will shine in the Saints attacking defense. Additionally, I like Williams from the Chargers. I look for de or lb in the draft.
Ajun Cajun exiled to Charlotte. I miss Mardi Gras and the Jazz Fest so much I could cry.
A name I want to throw out is an offensive guard.
With our young guards, we can afford to sign a guy with a proven track record and coming off injury. Someone, who could comeback say four or five games into the season and who will not command a large amount to sign because of his injury status. I am talking about Ryan Lilja from the Colts. We need a quality third guard and he did fail his physical with the Colts, but the word is he will be ready by the fourth or fifth game of the season. He would be worth a flyer at the right price.
Ajun Cajun exiled to Charlotte. I miss Mardi Gras and the Jazz Fest so much I could cry.
Considering we already know he's a good starting DE....
And considering he’s only 25, if you KNEW with 100% certainty you could use a late 1st round pick and get a good quality starting DE, with several more years of production ahead of him, why wouldn’t we use it? Just looking back a bit, how long did it take for Joe Johnson to become a dominant DE? At least a few years, IIRC.
Odds are that Edwards is better than any DE you’re going to get at 32 overall. That being said, I don’t see the point in affording Minnesota trade ammunition to work with in advance. What I would do is fly Edwards down to New Orleans for the entire week leading up to the draft. Tell him to bring his agent, his wife or a buddy and think of it as a paid vacation. Minutes before the Saints are on the clock, ask him to sign the offer sheet. The advantages of going about it this way are threefold. a.) It would only give the Vikings a few minutes to decide whether or not they’re going to match, a move Edwards could still override, provided he’s enjoyed his stay. b.) It wouldn’t give the Vikings the opportunity to use the pick to trade up. They’d be stuck with whatever’s available at the time and, if caught off guard, would have to make the selection very quickly. c.) This is going to sound lousy, but it would give the Saints the opportunity to renege, in the event that someone unexpected tumbles down the board, a la Brady Quinn, Aaron Rodgers, Deuce McAllister, etc. Regardless, you KNOW the Vikings would be aware of the potential situation, so you’d have them on pins and needles late into the night. A “thanks, but no thanks” + draft pick would ultimately cost the team a few thousand bucks extra in expenses, but what a powerful bird in the hand he would be. At least, until it came time to call the shot.
"I was not on the boat in question." -Darren Sharper
by coldpizza on Mar 12, 2010 8:26 PM CST reply actions 6 recs
Rec'd it...
Have you ever been called an evil genius? LOL
Eat, drink, and be merry, for tomorrow we die!
WHO DAT?!
by LA_No1_SaintFan on Mar 12, 2010 8:51 PM CST up reply actions
rec'd ...my thoughts exactly cp
i mean, how killer would it be if PayLoo had the contract for Ray Edwards in their back pockets right before their turn to draft?
The Easter Bunny is a savage...
by ShadowFlash on Mar 12, 2010 10:28 PM CST up reply actions
As I was scrolling down the posts...
…I was thinking just this scenario.
I think it’s a brilliant idea, but will Edward play along, as he knows just as well as anyone else that this could all end up with him being bait to mess with the Vikings.
Who Dat? TWO DAT! Do dat AGAIN!!!
by GSO Saints Fan on Mar 13, 2010 9:18 AM CST up reply actions
In theory this might be a good idea. There’s one huge major problem. The draft is after the RFA signing period ends. If we want to sign him, we have to do so by midnight EST on April 15th. The Vikes would then have until midnight April 21st to match or take our pick, and then the draft starts on the 22nd.
So this won’t work as you have it typed up. Sorry.
Now if we could get him for our 2nd, I’d take him in a heartbeat. But if it takes the 1st, I’m not so sure. And if the Eagles are truly interested, there’s no way we get him for the 2nd.
For those who can't remember the uncapped FA rules, this link's for you.
Ray Edwards: Report: Eagles not interested in Edwards
Beat writer Jeff McLane disputes a report that the Eagles are interested in Vikings restricted free agent DE Ray Edwards.
The Eagles and Saints have both been reported as teams interested in Edwards, but he remains unlikely to be signed to an offer sheet at the price of a first-round pick. Though he had a dominant postseason, there may be concerned about a drop in production without the Williams Wall and Jared Allen drawing double teams.
Pigs have flown! Hell has frozen over! The Saints HAVE WON the Superbowl!!
I vote no
Edwards is a known quantity, which is an advantage; but that known quantity doesn’t equal very much. He’s a solid starter, but little more. He has no “upside.”
These, however, are among the players who may be available when the Saints pick at #32: Sean Weatherspoon. Jared Odrick. Brian Price. Everson Griffen. Jerry Hughes. Brandon Graham. Maybe someone like Jermaine Gresham will unaccountably drop…every draft someone drops way below his actual value (Drew Brees, for instance). Any of those guys has the potential to be a star.
I’m not saying that it’s a sure thing that we get a star with our pick; it’s not. But using a first-round pick on someone who will never be any better than good enough is playing not to lose I want our front office to play to win.
"Time you enjoy wasting, was not wasted.." --J.O.L.
I don’t understand how a 25 year old just coming into his own can have no “upside”.
"I was not on the boat in question." -Darren Sharper
Brain damaged. Shell shocked. Beat up. No confidence. Paging Dr. Melfi…..
“So, tell me, Trent…. Why are you so afraid to throw the ball downfield??”

Rotoworld.com:
Trent Edwards-QB- Bills Feb. 15 – 5:55 pm et
Bills beat reporter Sal Maiorana agrees with the Buffalo News that Trent Edwards may be the team’s starting QB in 2010.
Maiorana is a beat writer for the Rochester Democrat & Chronicle. Edwards has proven incapable of staying healthy or connecting on downfield passes, but he at least appears to have the edge over Ryan Fitzpatrick. Still, if Edwards gets the nod we’d confidently bet the under on Buffalo winning seven games.
Voila, no upside.
I'm a faker, a paper clown
So, “playing to win” = choosing an unproven commodity that could turn out to be Will Smith (Rd.1 – Pk.18) or could turn out to be Jonathan Sullivan (Rd.1 – Pk.6).
I’m just asking.
I understand different people have different tolerances for “acceptable gambling losses”.
Pigs have flown! Hell has frozen over! The Saints HAVE WON the Superbowl!!
I forgot to add something important…
So, "playing to win" = choosing an unproven commodity that could turn out to be Will Smith (Rd.1 – Pk.18) or could turn out to be Jonathan Sullivan (Rd.1 – Pk.6)… and you don’t know which one you’re going to get until after you draft them, get them into camp, and maybe give them 2 years to “come into their own”.
Pigs have flown! Hell has frozen over! The Saints HAVE WON the Superbowl!!
Why all the love for Ray Edwards and none for our own guys?
Admittedly, Edwards had a solid season last year, but a lot of that had to to with the fact that he was playing on a line with three other guys who have a collective 9 All-Pro campaigns among them. He started every game and had 51 tackles, 8.5 sacks, 2 passes defensed, 1 forced fumble, and 1 fumble recovery.
Contrast that with Anthony Hargrove: 6 starts, and in limited action he had 42 tackles, 5 sacks, 3 passes defensed, 1 forced fumble, and 3 fumble recoveries, including one for a touchdown. And much of that was at defensive tackle, rather than his natural position of defensive end. Move him outside, and over an entire season at starter those are Will Smith numbers.
After a lot of thought, I’ve come to the conclusion that the convention wisdom that we’re thin at defensive end just isn’t true. Will Smith is a solid starter on one side; on the other, Anthony Hargrove, along with McCray and Charleston in rotation, will do fine. What I would like to see is Jared Odrick alongside Sedrick Ellis to provide disruption up the middle. Of course, it’s the draft, which means there’s no guarantee Odrick will still be available at #32. But if he’s not, someone else will be. I can’t see using a first-rounder on Ray Edwards when we already have someone in the building who is likely to be just as good.
"Time you enjoy wasting, was not wasted.." --J.O.L.
by MtnExile on Mar 14, 2010 10:13 AM CDT reply actions 1 recs
Yeah I’ve been saying all along we should be targeting DT not DE. But I guess we’ll see what PayLoo think in another five or six weeks…
For those who can't remember the uncapped FA rules, this link's for you.
Hargrove plays DT though
And I think the Saints will keep him there. While I do understand your reasoning for seeing DT as a need, DE is a serious need for us. We just lost a starter, and we have no every down or early down replacement at the spot. We are weak at DT, but in the NFL you especially need premier pass rushers at the end. Judging by the way the draft is playing out this year, it would be better to get one of the few really good DE talents in the first, and get a DT later because this year is filled with tons of excellent DTs, and finding anchoring run stuffers is easier than finding a penetrating 3-technique. So, depending on how you look at it, one position may appear to be bigger than another, but when you look at the list of available resources you would have to target for mainly value, especially in the draft.
I wouldn't mind getting half the "love" that the Saints are willing to give Sharper...
Actually Hargrove has played both, even for us. And before he came to town and put on some extra weight (at our coaches request) he was purely a DE. So I have strong expectations he could slide back out very easily.
Or he could stay as a two-way and be a part-time contributor off and on at either position as needed. And that might actually be the best use for him. But this means we need to find a stud DT and a stud DE in the draft, which isn’t super likely.
Thus I say focus on DT and if we can find a great DE as well, that’s just gravy. But a Hargrove/McCray combo should be able to easily fill Grants size 56 shoes at least in the short term.
For those who can't remember the uncapped FA rules, this link's for you.
I’m not trying to say we CAN’T get both a superb young DE and DT in this draft. I’m just saying it’s not super likely to successfully play darts and hit the bulls eye twice. And McCray alone can handle a lot of if not all of the pressuring the QB role, certainly at least in the short term. And if Hargrove can help spell him and/or help out on run downs (where he would fit the Grant role at his current weight quite well) or better yet do some of both, that means we’re even better at DE than we were.
Aside from the Starcaps situation that might cost us Smith for a few games (but might not either, we don’t know yet), I just don’t see a need to say that we must target DE in round 1. I’d certainly prefer that over OLB, but I’m not even married to that.
But our run defense was rather horrid much of last year and we still have to face Burner-Boy and two-headed-Carolwhina twice next year plus at least four other teams (maybe even 8) with good running games. At the moment our most CRITICAL need is a run-stuffing DT. Everything else we want we should try to get, but it’s not the most critical need.
Until and unless Pressley really steps up and grabs that starting NT role by the horns and makes us wish he was that good last year, at least.
For those who can't remember the uncapped FA rules, this link's for you.
heya a Vikes perspecitve of Ray
Vike here so take what I say with a grain of salt. Grumps trotted over to the dark side and started asking a question about Ray so I thought I’d come down here and see if you guys were chatting about it or not. Looks like you are.
Personally I like Ray and woud be sad to see him go. He has tremendous upside, at 25 he is in the beginning of his career, and if you look at other DE’s many of them start of in exactly the same progression that Ray has. He has consistantyl gotten more sacks every year he’s played for us, and he doesn’t play all passing downs as we move him out to rest and put Robinson in on third downs at times. What Ray does bring is a strong run stuffer and a strong pass rusher. He’ll never has the sacks Allen has because his job on our defensive line is different. Jared is in the enviable position of pretty much every down peeling his ears back and jumping the QB. Ray has to deal with the run and the passer.
Remember you have a tough as nails DE on the right side already so most of the offense will be looking at trying to stop him, leaving Ray in the same spot he is with us.
Personally, I would hope you keep your first round pick and Ray stays. If he doesn’t though I truly doubt you’ll be disapointed in him.
It's a lot easier to love the Vikings when they win...
It was more of a jog as opposed to a trot.
For your information Viking's and Colt's fans, no matter how much you say it, you were not the better team in 2009.

by 



















