NFL Draft 2010: New Orleans Saints Draft Grades
There are a lot of football talking heads who like to say that you can't actually judge the quality of a draft class for at least three years, if not more. To those people I say one thing: Shutup!
Are they right? Of course they are. How can you evaluate something or someone without having any sample to analyze. You can't. It's impossible.
Yet right now, all across the internet there are hundreds if not thousands of writers, bloggers, losers and analysts assigning grades to draft picks and overall team draft performances for your edification. How are they doing this without the aforementioned samples to analyze? They're pulling it out of their booty's. So I now present you with Canal Street Chronicles' 2010 Saints draft grades.
Yeah, that's right! Why should I get left out of all the fun? I've got a perfectly good booty. So I'm going to assign subjective grades to players I barely know anything about and whose future success I couldn't possibly predict. They'll be based only on my personal opinions, just a smidgen of research and my current emotional state, which at the current moment is mildly confused and heavily inebriated. But there will be a method to my madness. My evaluations will take into account player potential, perceived draft value, position of need, fan approval and whether they're expected to start next year.
Let's get on with it and dive head first into my current opinion of the Saints 2010 draft class. As always, your votes, opinions and comments are always welcome.
Patrick Robinson, CB, Florida St.
First Round
Analysis: With Jabari Greer and Tracy Porter firmly entrenched as the Saints starting corners, last years first round choice being used on CB Malcolm Jenkins and prospects like Sergio Kindle and Daryl Washington still on the board, the selection of cornerback Patrick Robinson with their thirty-second overall pick was quite the surprise to Saints fans. Given the situation Robinson will be entering, earning a regular gig as the starting nickel would be about as much as I would expect from the rookie this season. But if and when the injury bug rears its ugly head, P-Rob will make for great depth. Coming from the circus known as Florida States defense, he'll have a bit of a learning curve but there's plenty of raw talent and upside with this one if the coaching situation is right.
Grade: B-
Charles Brown, OT, USC
Second Round
Analysis: Picking an offensive tackle in the second round might not have seemed to make a lot of sense for the Saints, who had some holes to still fill on defense and a few highly rated players still left on the board to fill them, but the 34th overall rated Charles Brown was just too good to pass up with the 64th pick. With practically first round talent, I fully expect Brown to work his way into regular rotation and even push for a starting spot. I'm also optimistic his addition will help improve the Saints running game. With a quarterback like Drew Brees so heavily relied upon, taking a talented, versatile offensive tackle is never a bad thing. Especially when you're trying hard to get rid of your old one.
Grade: B+
Jimmy Graham, TE, Miami
Third Round
Analysis: Did the Saints really need to grab a tight end in the draft this year? Not really. Did they get good value with the 95th overall pick by selecting the 65th overall ranked player? Absolutely. From a value perspective, this was a wise move. But there were other players still on the board at the time - Everson Griffen and Eric Norwood - that might have made more sense and still been a reasonable value. With Jeremy Shockey and David Thomas sure to remain ahead of Graham on the depth chart for at least the next year, this move might be one made more with an eye on the future and not so much the present.
Grade:
C+
Al Woods, DT, LSU
Fourth Round
Analysis: Linebacker and defensive tackle were unanimously agreed upon before the draft as the Saints two biggest positions of need during this years draft. The selection of Al Woods in the fourth round was the only move made to address either of these needs in this years draft. Surprise, surprise. For that reason alone, this pick deserves a high mark. Add to that the fact he's a fan favorite, local product from LSU and you've got the makings of the Saints best 2010 draft pick. Even though the team had to give up a little to get in position for Woods, he was still a good value in the fourth round. I'd be very pleasantly surprised if he earned a starting spot next year but I'm definitely optimistic he'll overcome reported flaws of always disappointing and provide great depth, developing into more in the future.
Grade: A-
Matt Tennant, C, Boston College
Fifth Round
Analysis: Another solid move for the future of the team, assuming Tennant can make the transition smoothly. Jonathan Goodwin may not be the greatest center in the league but he's good enough and will assuredly be the starter next season. The relationship between center and quarterback is not one to be taken lightly. But there's no real depth behind him. A player like Tennant is valuable in the event of an injury to Goody or following his eventual decline.
Grade: B
Sean Canfield, QB, Oregon St.
Seventh Round
Analysis: Not a fan of this pick. It seems it's becoming tradition every year for Sean Payton to make some wild, late-round draft pick that causes Saints fans to scream, "WTF!?" Sometimes the fans are right (see: Taylor Mehlhaff) and sometimes they're wrong (see: Thomas Morstead). Like both of those situations, time will eventually tell. Obviously the Saints are thinking about the future of the team and/or a serious injury to Brees with this pick but it doesn't fill an urgent need and this spot could arguably have been better spent. We can only assume the front office had knowledge of another team set on drafting Canfield, otherwise why waste a pick on him when he could be had in undrafted free agency. What does Canfield have that all of Payton's other QB pet projects didn't anyway?
Grade: D
51 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I gave em a C
but in my grade i gave em a B- because the picks were value/depth picks…good players…but just not the positions we needed em in.
Grades
Robinson is at least a B
Cannfield is a C+. The kid is an exciting player and this pick is more about the next few years.
Draft Grade
I have to give the Saints an overall grade of B. I understand the Robinson pick and the team thinking. I am excited with the Graham and Woods picks. Any time you can continue to build the wall to protect Drew is great. Cannfield is a good kid and both he and Chase will grow under Drew mentorship.
The truth is..
Pride of a lot of people has been hurt since Thursday… Get on with it
"Saints don't commit sins, they exorcise demons. The NFL most accurate passer was preaching, and the league MVP watched as the Game MVP delivered an impressive sermon"
i just hope our two extra draft choices work out...
if Stanley Arnoux ends up being able to be a solid starter we’ll all be saying…that’s why they didn’t draft a OLB.
gave it a b
Looks like they went BPA or bust this year. Didnt get an OLB so they must know something we dont. I personally really liked what i saw from Casillas at the end of the year when he started getting some real play time. Wouldnt mind seeing him starting, he’s raw but you can see the potential to be a good starter. Would love to see this new TE in action. Al Woods should be able to atleast contribute to the DT rotation.
Robinson im kinda pumped about. Wasnt what anyone was expecting but i like the pick. We have a huge dropoff in corner talent after greer and porter. Robinson should step in as the nickel from day 1. From what the FSU blogger guy said i feel he’s comparable to porter his rookie season. both came out raw and athletic but with great man coverage and press skills. This allows us to make Jenkins a safety as well, which we all believe he can be great in that spot.
Overall im pleased. Ill give them the benefit of the doubt on trading up for woods. If he can contribute this season im fairly certain we’ll all forget about the 6th rounder that could’ve been. I dont feel like they made any huge reaches coughcoughjagscoughcough which is always good. All of these picks seem like they will be able to contribute at a level appropriate to thieir draft position, and all of them have the upside to be much better. Good draft
I give it a C
We got good value, but did we address needs? There was one position that I think at least 80% of us were hoping to improve in this draft, and Payloo gave us a big “F you” as far as getting an outside linebacker. Loomis says they don’t need an OLB, than then goes out and signs half a dozen OLBs as undrafted free agents? What is that about? So we actually do need one, but we aren’t going to attempt to get one of the better OLBs out there?
"I want to hand this trophy to the MVP of the Super Bowl -- and the MVP of the entire league.''
-- Saints coach Sean Payton, handing the Vince Lombardi Trophy to Drew Brees after Super Bowl 44.
Read my comment below VAsaintsfan...
RE: your presumed “need” for an OLB, the Saints’ front office sees the talent already in house with guys like Casillas, Dunbar and Arnoux on the rise. Who are we to question Gregg Williams if he sees a potential fit into his system from any one or more of those young guys already on the roster? Do you really think it was necessary to bring in a “stud” OLB through the draft just to give these guys a competitive spark when you could just sign undrafted FA’s to do the same thing? Think about it man…
Our linebacking corps has been the weakness of this team for a while. Casillas and Dunbar were deemed not worthy of starting ahead of Scott Fujita last year, and we were even calling for an upgrade to Fujita and Shanle. Look back at last year and tell me Shanle, Fujita, Charles Grant and the lack of a 2nd DT were not the weakest parts of the defense. Grant has been upgraded, but the other 2 positions received no help. They are the biggest need on the team, and the best they could do is get a project at DT and a couple of folks that have an outside shot at making the team in UFAs. I’m not saying draft a backup to push Stanley Arnoux. I’m saying use that 1st or 2nd or maybe even 3rd round pick to draft somebody better than him. That’s how you improve at a position that is a problem.
"I want to hand this trophy to the MVP of the Super Bowl -- and the MVP of the entire league.''
-- Saints coach Sean Payton, handing the Vince Lombardi Trophy to Drew Brees after Super Bowl 44.
by VAsaintsfan on Apr 25, 2010 1:41 PM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
“Who are we to question Gregg Williams if he sees a potential fit into his system from any one or more of those young guys already on the roster?”
We’re the fans that ultimately pay for these adequate/inferior entertainers. After striking out on Alfred Fincher (3rd), Cie Grant (3rd) and Courtney Watson (2nd), we’re supposed to get fired up about the potential surrounding Arnoux (4th), Casillas (undrafted), Dunbar (undrafted) and a hodge podge of other misfit toys? Granted, it might not take a whole lot to get back to Fujita (5th) and Shanle (7th) level production, but what’s wrong with the paying fan hoping for some actual difference makers at these positions for a change? Or did I answer that question with my first three examples? If our scouting department’s Achilles heel is properly evaluating linebacker talent, hire new scouts. Don’t write off spending early round picks — or in this case ANY picks — in those areas. If at first you don’t succeed … quit? Seriously? Because that’s the message I’m getting from Loomis right now. Sorry for being so blunt, but throwing sh** at a wall and hoping it sticks probably shouldn’t be looked upon as a strong desire to improve. Do you realize how long it’s been since we had an impact player at OLB? Keith Mitchell. Darion Conner. Maybe the radioisotope carbon-14 is talking out its a**, but I’m pretty sure that’s pre-dating Loomis.
"I was not on the boat in question." -Darren Sharper
I agree w/ CP (except the quit part)
I also think that we (fans) have become accustomed to seeing late round (UDFA’s) come in and step up, but at other positions – positions that is “easier to succeed at” than LB. We have been fortunate as of late and to continue to finding those “gems in the rough” is unlikely – hince the phrase “gems in the rough”.
We cannot continue to expect to have impact players come from the UDFA pool or 5-7th rounds. Find the stud LB’s – or find new scouts!
The person that came up with the phrase "Winning isn't everything" - must have lost.
by Fleur De Leap on Apr 27, 2010 2:42 AM CDT up reply actions
in house
Look at last years) issue in the draft. Everybody wanted the Saints to draft a stud) like Wells because a lot of fans thought we didn’t have what was needed to have a productive running game in house. Last year seemed to be the best ground game productivity since Duece was behind the line and healthy. Guys like Pierre were already here and fantastic. Bush had a good year. Bell was on fire at times but inconsistent and I really liked what I saw from Hamilton what little time he got on the field. So my point, LB position in house. We may just have the guys we need already here. I’m high on Arnoux due to his college play and talent he showed in college. I really think he could push for the starting spot if he can remain healthy. And both Dunbar and Castillias can be serviceable depth and don’t forget about Evans who is no stud at the position but is great on special teams and to be great in a special team role you gotta love to play so I like the guy’s enthusiasm. Bottom line is we may very well have the guys we need already here and who better to know than GW who must feel like we do cause they did not grab one in the draft.
by narco301 on Apr 26, 2010 12:49 AM CDT via mobile up reply actions
All I can say
is I hope you are right……
The person that came up with the phrase "Winning isn't everything" - must have lost.
by Fleur De Leap on Apr 30, 2010 2:34 PM CDT up reply actions
It unfair to grade a draft without taking into account the undrafted FA's brought in...
No offense Dave, but you should know that the Saints never intended for the draft to be the only way they address team “needs”.
The other thing I think is that we have to very careful how we define this team’s “needs” from our own limited outside-looking-in perspective. Mickey Loomis even said himself, in his pre-draft press conference, that the front office is viewing their linebacking corps (despite the loss of Scott Fujita in free agency) as a strength due to the current youth and talent already on the roster.
The trick now is just to bring in enough hungry competition to make sure those rostered guys stay on their toes all the way through training camp while working toward fielding them 53 man roster for the new season. That is something easily accomplished through the bringing in of undrafted free agents as competition for those limited roster spots.
Here is the most recent list to surface for the Saints signings of rookie free agents:
Brandon Carter – Texas Tech (OG)
Jason Beauchamp – UNLV (LB)
Junior Galette – Stillman (LB)
Clint Gresham – TCU (LS)
Ekom Udofia – Stanford (NT)
Harry Coleman – LSU (S)
Marcell Young – Jacksonville St. (CB)
Jay Ross – ECU (NT)
You might take notice of the signings of two additional NT’s to compete with drafted rookie NT Al Woods from day one as well as two more LB’s to add to our current stable of youth at that position which already includes Casillas, Dunbar, Mitchell, Waters and Arnoux.
Also, per the scouting reports of “lack of commitment” and “questionable mental involvement in the game” for CB Patrick Robinson, bring in one more undrafted FA CB to compete along with the already rostered Leigh Torrence, Reggie Jones, Greg Fassitt and Glenn Sharpe and the kid will have no choice but decide if he’s all in or not real fast.
By my rough calculation of your individual grades handed out here, it looks like you gave them a high C+ overall, huh Dave?
I graded the Saints draft picks on their own merit as a solid B and I agree with a lot of the points put forth by fruly.
“No offense Dave, but you should know that the Saints never intended for the draft to be the only way they address team "needs".”
Duly noted, for when we grade out how well the Saints addressed team needs over the course of the entire offseason. At the moment, we’re grading the DRAFT. Undrafted free agents have nothing to do with the draft. That’s like posting a restaurant review and including the after dinner sundae you had at Baskin-Robbins in your ratings. “Mmm, that sure was delicious!” ???? Awesome, I’ll have to stop there after I enjoy/not enjoy your recommendation.
"I was not on the boat in question." -Darren Sharper
I agree F-
KFFL was having server trouble too.
This draft screams Dynasty. If that's the case, then I say, let the Saints Reign begin!
Dave, at 6 a.m.?
my current emotional state, which at the current moment is mildly confused and heavily inebriated.
ATTABOY!
I write these the night before
Wanna say something? Sign up! It's free!
by Dave Cariello on Apr 25, 2010 12:35 PM CDT up reply actions
I give it an A
based on potential. These guys will all have a chance to sit back and learn from proven players without being forced into action immediately. Everyone picked this year has a chance and potential to be a starter in 2-3 years.
This draft screams Dynasty. If that's the case, then I say, let the Saints Reign begin!
Speaking of Charles Brown..
He got penalized just three times (3) in more than 1800 offensive snaps over the last two years. Not bad…
"Saints don't commit sins, they exorcise demons. The NFL most accurate passer was preaching, and the league MVP watched as the Game MVP delivered an impressive sermon"
thats a helluva lot better than JB
Charles is the future at that position on our team. He’s got at much upside as anyone in this draft, and I think he’ll eventually turn out to be better than any of the OTs taken before him.
This draft screams Dynasty. If that's the case, then I say, let the Saints Reign begin!
That's funny
We draft a 2nd round OT and he hasn’t even stepped foot into the facility, let alone practiced or played a single snap. Yet, we are ready to annoint him to the line?
Wait **********THIS JUST IN************
Jamal Brown was just called for false start
Either way, JB kept Drew’s back clean when he was in. Now, we’ll see if Brown can take Bushrod’s spot…..
The person that came up with the phrase "Winning isn't everything" - must have lost.
by Fleur De Leap on Apr 27, 2010 2:28 AM CDT up reply actions
C+ overall
Pretty good value throughout. Seemed to attack need in reverse order. Not addressing OLB and RB had a trickle down effect on the grades there. Despite the feel good vibe surrounding the home state Woods pick, there was truly no reason to trade away a pick to move up seven slots, especially when there were four DTs ranked higher available. I’ve included what amounts to a wasted pick demerit (Round 6), which could have been used to take one of the two aforementioned unaddressed needs. No real problems with most of the picks. There are just a few things I would’ve handled a little differently in hindsight. Unlike a fantasy football draft, there’s no serpentine order to balance things out. Drafting at 32, you’re behind the eight ball on every single pick. Considering what they had to work with, I think Loomis did a pretty good job going after the BPA. Argue position priority all you want. The fact remains that in this particular order, there were only 15 players who graded out higher pre-draft, that were bypassed based on individual preference.
1st Round – Patrick Robinson, CB Florida State.
Player Rating – 9.4. Rated 18.73 of 20.00.
Slot Value – 7.9. Rated 2nd-3rd round pick.
Compensation – N/A. No additional compensation.
Position Value – 9.4. Ranked 4th of 62 CBs.
Position Availability Value – 10.0. Highest ranked available CB.
Position Need – 3.8. Ranked 6th of 8 needs.
Overall Grade – 8.1.
Repick? – Yes. Sergio Kindle, OLB Texas.
2nd Round – Charles Brown, OT USC.
Player Rating – 9.6. Rated 19.13 of 20.00.
Slot Value – 10.0. Rated late 1st-early 2nd round pick.
Compensation – N/A. No additional compensation.
Position Value – 8.9. Ranked 6th of 55 OTs.
Position Availability Value – 9.8. 2nd ranked available OT.
Position Need – 5.7. Ranked 4th of 7 needs.
Overall Grade – 8.8.
Repick? – No.
3rd Round – Jimmy Graham, TE Miami.
Player Rating – 9.0. Rated 17.91 of 20.00.
Slot Value – 10.0. Rated 2nd-3rd round pick.
Compensation – N/A. No additional compensation.
Position Value – 8.1. Ranked 10th of 52 TEs.
Position Availability Value – 8.7. 7th ranked available CB.
Position Need – 3.3. Ranked 5th of 6 needs.
Overall Grade – 7.8.
Repick? – No.
4th Round – Al Woods, DT LSU.
Player Rating – 8.7. Rated 17.49 of 20.00.
Slot Value – 10.0. Rated late 3rd-4th round pick.
Compensation – minus 1.8. Picks 130 and 201.
Position Value – 6.2. Ranked 19th of 50 DTs.
Position Availability Value – 9.0. 5th ranked available DT.
Position Need – 3.8. Ranked 2nd of 5 needs.
Overall Grade – 7.2.
Repick? – Yes. Cam Thomas, DT North Carolina.
5th Round – Matt Tennant, C Boston College.
Player Rating – 9.0. Rated 17.90 of 20.00.
Slot Value – 10.0. Rated 2nd-3rd round pick.
Compensation – minus 2.3. 4th round pick (2011).
Position Value – 9.0. Ranked 3rd of 30 Cs.
Position Availability Value – 10.0. Highest ranked available C.
Position Need – 5.0. Ranked 3rd of 4 needs.
Overall Grade – 8.1.
Repick? – No. Ok with trading next year’s 4th, since we had no 5th.
6th Round, no selection.
Player Rating – 0.0.
Slot Value – 0.0.
Compensation – N/A. Included in 4th round compensation.
Position Value – 0.0.
Position Availability Value – 0.0.
Position Need – 0.0.
Overall Grade – 0.0.
Repick? – Yes. 4th round trade up unnecessary. LeGarrette Blount, RB Oregon.
7th Round – Sean Canfield, QB Oregon State.
Player Rating – 8.3. Rated 16.51 of 20.00.
Slot Value – 10.0. Rated 6th-7th round pick.
Compensation – N/A. No additional compensation.
Position Value – 6.6. Ranked 15th of 44 QBs.
Position Availability Value – 8.9. 5th ranked available CB.
Position Need – 3.3. Ranked 3rd of 3 needs.
Overall Grade – 7.4.
Repick? – Yes. A.J. Jefferson, CB Fresno State.
Overall Draft
Avg Player Rating – 7.7
Avg Slot Value – 8.3
Avg Compensation – minus 0.6
Avg Position Value – 6.9
Avg Position Availability Value – 8.1
Avg Position Need – 3.6
Overall Grade – 6.8
"I was not on the boat in question." -Darren Sharper
it just seems to me that a TE who has only caught 17 passes since his freshman year in High School??
I don’t know, we needed too much elsewhere and didn’t really need this. I like that he is athletic, had BB experience, and is very tall. But, …well we shall see.
"I think we agree, the past is over" - George W Bush
"The greatest enemy of knowlege is not ignorance; it is the illusion of knowledge" Stephen Hawking
With less xp
also comes less tread on his tires… I reserve my full grade until, at the very earliest, preseason
With the 32nd pick of the 2010 NFL Draft, the New Orleans Saints say "Sean Weatherspoon, come on down!!!"
I don't think you can compare the # penalties that a college player gets called for
against the # penalties an All-Pro LT gets called for vs. All-Pro pass rushers and who is pass-blocking for an offensive team that passes a huge amount and also has a QB worth tens of millions that needs to be protected at all costs. Just apples to oranges.
"I think we agree, the past is over" - George W Bush
"The greatest enemy of knowlege is not ignorance; it is the illusion of knowledge" Stephen Hawking
Jammal Brown has never been named All-Pro. He’s been elected to the Pro Bowl twice, once as an alternate. There’s a difference. All-Pro is the best from both conferences combined.
"I was not on the boat in question." -Darren Sharper
also
the All-Pro status is voted by “experts” who know what they were doing, where a Pro Bowl player is voted on in a popularity contest, where you get in on your name alone. (for the most part)
Except for Alan Faneca. All Pro and Pro Bowl 2009, cut by unconditional release 4/24/2010 because he’s hugely overpaid and actually played like crap in 2009. Look at him, he’s so smug, I hate him.

The new kid in town
Everybody loves you, so don't let them down
I also have to agree with Va Sainst fan
in that we should have drafted to bolster LB and DL positions. I was one of the few that was ok with our Linebackers, but felt our depth at LB was questionable and with Fujita gone, I am really concerned. Lots of people are saying Arnoux will step up and hopefully he will, but he is a rookie as far as playing time and is coming off an inury. That’s two big question marks. And, although replacing Grants was a good move, we did not replave him with an elite DE, so we are pretty questionable at multiple defensive posotions. And, although I like Shanle and he played well in the playoffs, he won’t last forever and he is not really an All-Pro level LB- he is steady and reliable but a little slow and far from exceptional. So, why we picked for CB, OT and TE and QB mystifies me- unless is what all about saving $$ which I think is the best explanantion. All or most of these picks should sign pretty cheap.
"I think we agree, the past is over" - George W Bush
"The greatest enemy of knowlege is not ignorance; it is the illusion of knowledge" Stephen Hawking
Lets just hope
that the coaching staff knows a little bit more about this than we tend to think. They did not address DE or LB (even though Woods is a “tweener”).
I would think that they have something up their sleeves to address those positions….err…I hope!
The person that came up with the phrase "Winning isn't everything" - must have lost.
by Fleur De Leap on Apr 27, 2010 2:20 AM CDT up reply actions
“All or most of these picks should sign pretty cheap.”
I agree with that, though I’m not sure how that plays into what position was addressed when. Pretty much anyone we selected at 32, 64, etc., would have been making bottom of the barrel when compared to most other rookies.
"I was not on the boat in question." -Darren Sharper
I love grading the draft the next day
I remember everyone giving the Chiefs an “A” for drafting Glenn Dorsey
I remember
when people were saying that Vilma was washed up with his knee injury, when in fact he changed into a 3-4 and became a nobody.
I think, unless Dorsey gets into a 4-3, we should not pass judgement. I hope that the Saints give him a shot and let him play next to Ellis. Could be wrong tho.
The person that came up with the phrase "Winning isn't everything" - must have lost.
by Fleur De Leap on Apr 27, 2010 2:15 AM CDT up reply actions
No grade from me
As stated from others before, grading now is difficult to do – but comments are always good.
My favorite pick – Brown OT
Least favorite – Canfield QB
I like that the Saints picked up Brown to have more depth on the line. I believe that games are won and lost on the line and teams without depth are 1 injury away from a make/break season.
I think we could have taken a risk on another position in the 7th round though. Even if Canfield blows us all away and shows signs of the next HOF QB – ya think he is going to get on the field? Even if Brees got hurt – Canfield would have to play like Brees/Manning/Brady combined to take Drew’s job. Just think we could have taken a risk on a different position, DE or S perhaps.
I did not know much about the CB Robinson prior to the draft, still don’t. From what I hear is that he is inconsistant, but has the best raw talent at his position in the draft. Sounds like he needs some work, which they all do, but not what I expected for our 1st rounder. I was screaming for S. Kindle (LB) when the Saints were up, but they passed. Hopefully they are right and I am wrong (about Kindle).
As for Graham, Woods, and Tennant: These are solid picks and what you would expect from those rounds. High upside, minimum risks. Graham “could be the next A. Gates”, maybe because he plays B-Ball….I dunno.
Overall, I think the Saints did well. I cannot argue with picking the best player available especially when you are picking last due to winning the SB. Heck, can’t really argue with SB winning coaches and GM’s.
I think we get 2 starters, hopefully Woods and Robinson – cause thats where we need the most help.
The person that came up with the phrase "Winning isn't everything" - must have lost.

by 

























