Clint Ingram: Boom or Bust?
The Saints newest addition, linebacker Clint Ingram, is the hot topic right now in Who Dat Nation. Whether he likes it or not, the spotlight will shine bright on him this summer during training camp. Fans are anxious to finally see an improvement at outside linebacker this season and Ingram, who has multiple years of NFL starting experience, has to be considered the best option toward achieving that goal (I'm not discussing Arnoux until I see him play). Hope and expectation are running high.
But as with all free agent acquisitions, the results from a player production standpoint can be either good or bad making the overall move either a success or a failure. Whether it's a result of bad coaching, a worrisome injury or known character issues, there is a reason players hit the market. Each free agent signing is a roll of the dice with the built-in belief that things will certainly be better with their new team. Players like Jonathan Vilma, Darren Sharper and Anthony Hargrove are all great examples of astute front office maneuvers made recently that have turned out well for the team on the field. Former Saints tight end Eric Johnson might be an example of the process gone bad.
You'll remember earlier this week that I was somewhat hesitant about the addition of Clint Ingram before the signing was even announced. After hearing Ingram's own words in a Times-Pic article from last night, however, my confidence is raised. It appears Ingram may have been the victim of a nagging ankle injury and a defense in disarray, meaning all he needs to succeed is precious time and an aggressive, championship-winning defensive coordinator.
"Coming in the way I had ended up the year before and the way I had went through offseason and trained and got myself ready, (the season was disappointing)," said Ingram, who had 52 tackles and one sack in 13 games before being sidelined by a shoulder injury. "I had a minor (ankle) injury in camp, then it didn't seem like I could ever really get going the way I wanted to. Whether it was me pressing or for some reason I was uptight, trying to make plays. I was just trying to do more than just doing my job. I really just can't put my finger at what the problem was.
"I had some on and off games. I wasn't as consistent as I thought I should have been. And our whole season, we just didn't have too many guys who really played that good. We went back and forth as far as a 3-4 (alignment) and 4-3. We were kind of looking for our identity the whole year."
This is where I open it up for discussion. What do you guys think? Next off-season, will we be talking about the importance of the Saints offering Ingram a well-deserved, multi-year contract or who the team will be able to find and replace him? Explain your answer. Partial credit will be awarded.
19 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Cautiously Optimistic!!!
We new that Vilma was a victim of being moved to a system that just didn’t benefit his skillsets. The same can be said of Sharper as well. Coming into the league we new him to be a run stopper and I think that is we need from him. A Mediocre coverage ability will be just fine. The key to him having a chance to be successful in coverage will be in the hands of the front 4. We have got to get more of a pass rush than we had last year. I think he will help, but don’t think he’ll be any worse than Shanle. Also, we play a 4 – 3 defense….What about the other linebacker? Guys Fuji is gone! Hopefully one of the younger guys can step it up and make a difference here! I still believe, but don’t want the offense to have to carry the team again!
In regards to Vilma
more important than he didn’t fit in the 3-4 scheme is that Mangini didn’t like him. Vilma could have been fine in a 3-4. For whatever reason Mangini didn’t like him and it had a big effect. I guess that was a harbinger to what kind of coach Mangini was going to be.
"I think we agree, the past is over" - George W Bush
"The greatest enemy of knowlege is not ignorance; it is the illusion of knowledge" Stephen Hawking
Doesn't ease my mind
The Saints go back and forth between a 3-4 and a 4-3 as well. If he can’t play one of those, that’s a problem. And its not just that he can’t play 3-4. From the reports I’ve seen, when Jax went to a 4-3 he looked just as bad.
With that said, I don’t think he’s that bad of a linebacker. Only time will tell if he is better than Fujita, but he is cheaper, and that’s a big selling point. I don’t expect him to play lights out, but if he can play up to his salary level, then I think the improvements in the D-Line and secondary can carry the defense.
"I want to hand this trophy to the MVP of the Super Bowl -- and the MVP of the entire league.''
-- Saints coach Sean Payton, handing the Vince Lombardi Trophy to Drew Brees after Super Bowl 44.
Plain & simple, if he recovers as expected fr/ his scope knee surgery, he makes our D better...
…right from the get-go. He appears to me to be no less than a lateral move when compared to Fujita in that he’s almost as big as Scott was and he is hopefully still faster than Fuji was.
The big question here is “if” he recoups from knee surgery well enough to maintain his past speed for size ratio, his pass-rush abilities and his coverage skills on TE’s, RB’s out of the backfield and bigger WR’s across the middle.
Let’s just hope that he is near to 100% ready come training camp time so that he can truly compete with these even younger guys that we already have waiting in the wings, huh?
rotoworld.com:
Clint Ingram-LB- Saints May. 20 – 8:09 pm etI’m thinking he’s more Simoneau than Fujita. Or maybe I’m thinking of Brian Simmons.
Newly signed Saints LB Clint Ingram revealed that he underwent a “small microfracture” knee surgery recently. Ingram had a scope to remove a cyst and the procedure included some microfracture techniques, which is similar to the way Darren Sharper’s recent surgery was described. Just now getting off crutches, Ingram will watch from the sidelines at next week’s OTAs. He hopes to be ready for full speed by training camp, though that seems unlikely.
Arrive without travelling,
See all without looking,
Do all without doing.
by stujo4 on May 21, 2010 9:21 AM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
Well, he does know GW and his defensive schemes already, so that's a definite plus in his favor...
Even if he isn’t ready to go full speed for the opening day of training camp, he still has time before the preseason and could step right onto the field for one or two games there to show what he can do before the final cuts.
Who knows? It’s a wait and see low risk, high potential reward signing in my mind at this point.
Some work left to do...
I’m disappointed that we didn’t draft someone for this spot or find a better free agent to sign. Of course, if the DL get’s better at rushing the passer, we just need a good athlete at this spot. I’ll be very pleased if this one turns out to be another one of those outstanding front office moves.
Very concerned about our running backs and with the back up QB situation, God forbid anything happens to Drew.
Butch
Hopefully Boom
I think he will be fine and an upgrade over Fujita (even tho I really liked Fuji). Walter football has Ingram listed as the 7th best free agent OLB and Fujita was ranked 17th. Of course that is all speculation but that’s all any of us have right now.
by cbkao on May 21, 2010 2:25 PM CDT via mobile reply actions
boom to the left of him...busts to the right
here he is…stuck somewhere in the middle with you
we’ll see
Stu’s Brian Simmons comment might be truer than we think…
boom rec you for the Simmons, Stu
We've got 27 ways to add up to 11 (players on the field). I came up with another one last night. -- GW
You should give him one of these...

Wanna say something? Sign up! It's free!
by Dave Cariello on May 21, 2010 4:36 PM CDT up reply actions
yeah - that may become my next avatar!
We've got 27 ways to add up to 11 (players on the field). I came up with another one last night. -- GW
by Hans Petersen on May 21, 2010 7:13 PM CDT up reply actions
..& let the shanle bashin, shibacle comence..
i have attempted to pound some points about the skill needs for our LBs for years seem like, mostly on nola.com..
he’ we go again.. the LBs on a typical 43 only got one primary job.. shed blocks & make tackles.. that’s it.. in most circumstances it’s a safety that covers man-2-man the TE.. the LB may be asked to zone the RB out of the backfield.. occasional blitz (from the LB position, mostly.. meaning, behind the D-line, ergo.. hard to get home unless you really got blazing speed). so that’s it.. we got a good player in shanle, who does his job.. we might have just found us the “sam” (ingram) if he does his job.. i voted boom..
Also cautiously optimistic
I’ll wait to see if there is any improvement in his abilities once he’s paired again with Gregg Williams and joins the Saints D. If he’s willing to put forth some effort and becomes familiar with our schemes, he might just prove to be yet another “diamond” in the rough for the Saints. As you may recall, they’ve had some sucess in that area…
"The Saints made the right decision signing Drew Brees-not just in terms of his arm, but because of his heart and mind." - Marshall Faulk
I just hope he is very smart
I think we have one of the smartest groups of LBs in the league. And when Fujita and Simoneau played, they were very smart too. That only gets you so far, though and then you have to be tough, fast, and fundamentally sound. Fujita was very smart and that will be hard to replace. I think playing LB in the NFL, a lot of that “smarts” comes with experience. Vilma and Shanle have that experience too. But it is a great asset to start out with a good brain as a basis and also to be very dedicated to film study.
"I think we agree, the past is over" - George W Bush
"The greatest enemy of knowlege is not ignorance; it is the illusion of knowledge" Stephen Hawking
I just read the post about LBs in a 4-3
and I totally disagree. Lbs in a 4-3 have tremendous pass defense responsibilities. And, with so many teams passing more these days, that explains why LBs have to be faster and more mobile (i.e. smaller) especially Ols to cover RBs, TEs and even wideouts coming across the middle. Most teams nowadays have AT LEAST one wide receiver who requires a double team – a CB and Safety usually- sometimes 2 players deep (Henderson- Colston) . OLs have to be very versatile- they cover the middle of the field usually and their level of pass defense can often decide the game. If the opposing offense (such as the NO Saints) knows they can complete passes in the middle of the field at will (to players such as Colston, Shockey, F Thomas, Bush, P Thomas, Evans) they can have their way with defenses and we did. That’s been the biggest key to our offense’s success- a QB and other personnel that can outplay the opposition’s defense in the middle of the field consistently- for first downs especially. The responsilbility of LBs is way more than shedding blocks and making tackles. If that was so, Jeremiah Trotter would still be playing. If LBs show they cannot cover, you better believe an offensive coordinator will find a way to cause a match up to exploit. They’ll never run the ball if a LB can’t cover the pass. It’s just too easy to exploit for a short pass in the West Coast offense. And that’s exactly why you see Payton get so pass happy at times.
"I think we agree, the past is over" - George W Bush
"The greatest enemy of knowlege is not ignorance; it is the illusion of knowledge" Stephen Hawking

by 

























