Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Jeremy Lin And How The Pac-12 Missed Him

Commissioner Roger Goodell Discusses Enhanced Season

Per NFL Labor.

Commissioner Roger Goodell at NFL High School Player Development Clinic in Queens, NY - June 17, 2010

Why are you pushing the concept of additional regular season games?

One of the things when we discussed this a year ago and as recently as yesterday is what we need to do to make the game better. How do we improve the game, not only through rules and equipment, but also with offseason training? Should we do things differently? I think we have to. We have been making a lot of those changes but we have to continue to evolve the game in that way. And the players are a big part of that process.

Are negotiations getting contentious?

This is a negotiation. You have to have a dialogue about how to make the game better. That includes for fans. That includes for the participants, including the players and coaches. It includes the teams. That's what a dialogue is and that's what the dialogue has been and will continue to be.

Will it get more contentious in the future?

I can't tell the future of it. I know the intent of the NFL is to deal with this as we have in the past, which has been in a very business-like fashion with our partners and to make sure we do everything we can to make the game better.

On players' reaction against the 18-game schedule:

I've been talking about this for two years, including with the players. I don't think there's anything I'm not aware of with respect to the players. I will continue to talk with them, as we all will.

Star-divide

On 18 games and changes to training camp/offseason activities:

We do have to make changes.  We've been very open about that from day one.  We have to do that regardless. I think there are a lot of changes that need to be made about the way we prepare our teams and prepare our players.  The game is changing, and we have to change with it.

What are other changes you are referring to?

You specifically mentioned training camp and offseason.  There could be anything from roster sizes to injured reserve rules to something that focuses on the offseason and training camp. It's clear the fans don't want four preseason games. It's clear the players don't want four preseason games. They tell me that all the time. If you ask them that question, they'll tell you.  And we really don't need it to make the game better. So we have to evolve just as we did a couple of decades ago when we went from six preseason games to four and went from 14 regular season games to 16.  This concept has been done before as the game evolves and it helps improve the game.

Are voluntary offseason workouts really voluntary?

They are. But obviously there's a lot of pressure from teammates and coaches. I think we need to have some kind of guidelines and restrictions on what can be done and what can't be done in the offseason.

On developmental league and possible role UFL could play:

We know how to do football leagues. We've had developmental leagues in the past. We recently had NFL Europe as an example. I think our concept here is to have a league here in the states and to do it specifically to develop football players and football coaches and officials and football personnel so they get the chance to play the game. That's how players develop and get better. Our focus would be on allowing them to play the game.

On time of year developmental league would play:

There's a lot of discussion about that. Clearly offseason would be an important element. But there's been a discussion about maybe having a split season where you would also play during the NFL season.

On players' comments on 18-game schedule re: pay scale:

They are paid a percentage of our gross revenue that includes revenue from preseason games.  What we're trying to do is figure out ways to grow those opportunities for the players.  And when you explain that to them they understand.  Also they are very focused on safety and that's a very legitimate concern. And they've engaged in that. I've had a great dialogue with them.

On concern by starters that will play more games than they do now because they sit out most of the preseason:

They used to play six preseason games. Part of the reason that the quality of those games is not good is because those players are not playing.  It is another indication they don't need that to get ready for the season. So we have to adjust to what they're doing.

On extra two games adding up and causing more injury:

Injuries are part of the game. You can't prevent injuries.  What you can do is do things to make sure that they are physically prepared, give them the best medical care, and make sure we're doing everything we can so that they play for as long as possible.

But that is two more chances they have to get injured:

Under your theory we should play 10 games. We play a 20-game format. One of the things that has changed in our game is that they are no longer playing in those preseason games. They're playing a game-and-a-half or two games and three games.  That's part of the issue.

Poll
Would you like to see the NFL extend the season to 18 games?
Yes
123 votes
No
120 votes

243 votes | Poll has closed

Comment 29 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I voted, yes...

mostly because it would mean less pre-season and more regular season.

"Do not anticipate trouble or worry about what may never happen. Keep in the sunlight. " ~Benjamin Franklin

by Dan Kelly on Jun 18, 2010 2:21 PM CDT reply actions  

I also voted yes

because I love football and would like to see more regular season. Looking at things objectively, however, you have to realize that the players have some realistic concerns regarding injuries and other issues.

"The Saints made the right decision signing Drew Brees-not just in terms of his arm, but because of his heart and mind." - Marshall Faulk

by SaintsFanMD on Jun 18, 2010 2:40 PM CDT reply actions  

BOOM!

It’s like he’s channelling the spirit of MtnExile or something! Uncanny!

It was worth the wait.

by MtnExile on Jun 18, 2010 4:14 PM CDT up reply actions  

BOOM! rec'd ya jeff.

Making a jump from a 16 game season to a 18 is a fairly big jump. I would be possible for a team to play 20 games in a season.
This appears to be an effort to obtain more revenue for owners and the NFL at the players expense. How in the world could you talk about a 18 game season without consensus from the NFLPA with the new CBA? Perhaps his thinking is generating additional revenue would also take care of the NFLPA concerns in regards to salary. Slow down Goodell. Just slow the F Down. If a change with the amount of games is in the future it should a one game at a time. Go to a 3 preseason game format with 17 games. If it works out for the players then you could possibly go up to a 18 game season, or just leave it where it is. In addition you would need to be able to have teams expand their rosters with 5 additional players.

Goodell always says it is what our fans want. That is true, but if athletes are exposed to additional wear and tear, and teams get bitten by the injury bug, who will they have to cheer for. In addition if no CBA is reached there will be absolutely no teams for any team to cheer for.

"I can eat oreos faster than him" Scott Fujita's take on Payton Manning SB44

by jeremysherwin on Jun 18, 2010 6:34 PM CDT up reply actions  

That is something I could get behind.

Move to a 17 game format first to test, then if most people are happy, move to an 18 game season. With More roster spots to compensate for the additional injuries. Make sure the players get their cut of the new found money, and increase their health benefits to help with the possibility of more injuries. Everyone seems to win, so this method won’t be used and instead some arcane, byzantine system will be used that everyone hates.

by Jon Banks on Jun 18, 2010 11:55 PM CDT up reply actions  

Honestly

Does “increasing their health benefits” really help? What a slap in the face. Yeah you will have access to more care, say a 24 hour nurse, after you have that spinal chord injury.

Forgive if I’m wrong but aren’t these the same guys who continually add rules to make the game safer for players? Won’t they have to add more rules to accomodate the injuries to come, leaving us with a watered down version of the game we love that stops gaining fans because it’s boring to watch?

"I firmly believe that any man's finest hour, the greatest fulfillment of all that he holds dear, is that moment when he has worked his heart out in a good cause and lies exhausted on the field of battle - victorious." - Vince Lombardi

by SarahT on Jun 20, 2010 4:05 AM CDT via mobile up reply actions  

17 games and make everyone happy

You are my people, you are my crowd, this is our music, we love it loud...

by bondcrash on Jun 18, 2010 3:58 PM CDT reply actions  

Commissioner Roger Goodell at NFL High School Player Development Clinic in Queens, NY - June 17, 2010

Why are you pushing the concept of additional regular season games?

Simple. Money. We can charge the networks more to carry our games, and all the players already under contract won’t make an extra dime. Besides, too many ungrateful fans are complaining about the mandatory preseason packages included with their season tickets. So we’ll just convert those games to seasonal matchups and all the malcontents will shut up. Or else.

Are negotiations getting contentious?

Of course they are. There’s money out there that we don’t have yet. You think we’re giving up easy? Not a chance. If we could make more money by forcing the players to wear clown suits (well, the Bengals already do) and drink lye, we’d do that, too.

Will it get more contentious in the future?

Probably. We’ll back off the lye demand, though, and that way the union will be forced to make a concession of their own. We’re shooting for rebating their game checks. We feel that’s not unreasonable.

On players’ reaction against the 18-game schedule:

Too bad. I’m Roger F—-ing Goodell. I get what I want.

It was worth the wait.

by MtnExile on Jun 18, 2010 4:25 PM CDT reply actions  

Call me an old-fashioned toothless soothsayer

But I just don’t see this as a good thing. If you’re a longtime student of the game of football, you can get ready to watch every major NFL record fall within the next decade if there’s an additional two games on the slate. I’m not entirely sure why that thought bothers me so much, but it does.

Sign up for a free account today to join the discussion about all things Atlanta Falcons!

by Dave Choate on Jun 18, 2010 4:38 PM CDT reply actions  

i agree with the falconeer

i like it the way it is….

I love it when a plan comes together! -Hannibal

by DrewBreesManCrush on Jun 18, 2010 5:33 PM CDT up reply actions  

There's a very good reason why it bothers you

and why it should bother everyone: continuity with the past is important. Tradition is important., just as a general principle. Breaking with the past in order to gain two extra injury traps—excuse me, games—per season is like selling your birthright for a mess of pottage. Well, not quite, but you get the idea.

Dang it, DBMC…can’t you wait until I finish being long-winded before posting?

It was worth the wait.

by MtnExile on Jun 18, 2010 5:34 PM CDT up reply actions  

Are you suggesting we go back to 14 games? 14 is “the past” and it would be safer.

I’m just saying.

:-)

"Do not anticipate trouble or worry about what may never happen. Keep in the sunlight. " ~Benjamin Franklin

by Dan Kelly on Jun 18, 2010 6:39 PM CDT up reply actions  

HEALTH IS NOT A FACTOR! Here is my formula:

Expand the season by 2 games + expand the roster by 5 slots = WIN

by xen-cuts on Jun 18, 2010 5:15 PM CDT reply actions  

And… Roger would say, “technically, we’re not expanding the season – which includes 16 games + 4 pre-season games + the post-season. We’re ‘enhancing’ the regular season by shifting two games from the pre-season to the regular season – still a total of 20 games + post-season play.”

+ pre-reply +

I agree, the starters don’t play as hard in pre-season and they don’t play much at all in fourth game, but they could still get injured, just like a regular season game.

If you continue with the thought that the starters don’t play as hard… you could find yourself in a scenario where our LT isn’t blocking as hard as he should be and Shawne Merriman is coming off the edge with a clear shot… I don’t even want to finish that.

"Do not anticipate trouble or worry about what may never happen. Keep in the sunlight. " ~Benjamin Franklin

by Dan Kelly on Jun 18, 2010 6:47 PM CDT up reply actions  

Voted no

This would only make the problem of teams not playing their starters at the end of the year worse. What then? The last two games of the season would be against division opponents. The last three?

The best teams in the NFL would defiantly have no reason to play their starters at the end of the season.

"We've got 27 ways to add up to 11 (players on the field). I came up with another one last night." -- Greg Williams

by DrWhoDat on Jun 18, 2010 9:26 PM CDT reply actions  

I agree they'd be pretty defiant about it

We've got 27 ways to add up to 11 (players on the field). I came up with another one last night. -- GW

by HansDat on Jun 19, 2010 4:58 PM CDT up reply actions  

voted yes

but 18 regular and 2 preseason 60 man roster. Our org. has been good with their talent finds and the coach plays the players that can do the work. Point is teams like N.O. will flourish in the situation because of their approach to the game as it is today. The teams that sit on top are the ones that have adjusted to the new rules and regulations the best. Yes I truly believe the Saints have reached that plateau of elite org. status in the NFL. But I believe players have to be paid. I believe the org. is not doing PT right and believe it entirely involves his draft status, pay the players that do the job.

What wonderful little gifts April Fools Day brings.
~D's Pappy

by OldFartFan on Jun 19, 2010 9:49 AM CDT reply actions  

Uh, no

Okay here are my thoughts as a newbie. It’s obvious how many injuries occur in one season, especially towards the end. It’s one thing for us to say crap so and so is hurt, I hope he heals quickly so we can win. On the player’s side these are life long injuries – plates, pins, knee surgeries and fluid drainings, dementia, years of rehabilitation for body parts that will never work right again, and these guys will keep playing because they love football and it’s their job. It’s alarming to see people (ie. Goodall) take advantage of that.

Adding people to the roster doesn’t save the players that are irreplaceable because if it’s a regular season game those people are playing (unless a playoff spot is secured, which is a whole other argument). Do you really want to sacrifice Brees for 1 or 2 extra regular season games? I say no not only because I love my team but also because I respect him as a person. Just because someone will do something for you doesn’t mean you are entitled to ask them to do it. I see why Goodall is so hated. If there are too many preseason games then loose 1 or 2 preseason games.

"I firmly believe that any man's finest hour, the greatest fulfillment of all that he holds dear, is that moment when he has worked his heart out in a good cause and lies exhausted on the field of battle - victorious." - Vince Lombardi

by SarahT on Jun 20, 2010 3:47 AM CDT via mobile reply actions  

Sorry - Goodell

"I firmly believe that any man's finest hour, the greatest fulfillment of all that he holds dear, is that moment when he has worked his heart out in a good cause and lies exhausted on the field of battle - victorious." - Vince Lombardi

by SarahT on Jun 20, 2010 3:48 AM CDT via mobile up reply actions  

But I'm sure the gorilla poachers hate Goodall a lot, too.

We've got 27 ways to add up to 11 (players on the field). I came up with another one last night. -- GW

by HansDat on Jun 20, 2010 5:41 PM CDT up reply actions  

oooga

It's no New Year's resolution
It's more than that

by stujo4 on Jun 20, 2010 7:00 PM CDT up reply actions  

Bwhahaha!

"I firmly believe that any man's finest hour, the greatest fulfillment of all that he holds dear, is that moment when he has worked his heart out in a good cause and lies exhausted on the field of battle - victorious." - Vince Lombardi

by SarahT on Jun 21, 2010 12:44 AM CDT via mobile up reply actions  

It is all about money and that is it...he needs

to stop insulting our intelligence by stating that fans want 18

Nobody wants 18…just the owners looking to cash in

by Alious on Jun 20, 2010 5:05 PM CDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

The ultimate community for lovers of all things Black and Gold! The latest news, commentary, discussion, linkage and more! Join in the conversation now with all of your fellow Who Dats!

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

1311373128_guildwars2commando_697440_small
CSC Lagniappe: #13 Alltime Saints

Recent FanPosts

Small
Saints showing disrespect towards Drew Brees
Images_small
Hosting the Super Bowl
Small
Understanding our broken psyche (or "Why does it still hurt?")
Small
12 men on the field strategy?
Evil_bunny_small
Statistical Breakdown of WR Usage
271015_10150225174105754_682505753_7748609_5242564_n_1__small
My thoughts on the offseason
Angry_birds_small
About Robert Meachem
Parental_small
Expendable?
1311373128_guildwars2commando_697440_small
More draft options 2nd round or later...

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Featured Poll

Poll
Which Saints regular season was better: 2009 or 2011?
2009
402 votes
2011
446 votes

848 votes | Poll has closed

Twitter-logo_medium


Head Coach

Erindavewhodat_small Dave Cariello

Assistant Coach (Editor/Contributor)

0113wbphillips_small HansDat

Saintslogo_small Andrew Juge

Offensive Coordinators (Contributors)

13088_f520_small David "Satch" Kelly

L_f46d02fdda5fad668929c4424cb0d2dc_small Preston J. Gary, Jr.