Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Indy 500: 'Greatest Spectacle In Racing' Set For Sunday

Top 15 Starting WR rankings for Next Season


Welcome, if you have read my previous two posts then bravo, you are the only people to stand listen to me... err type for that long. Just like with the RBs this will be from a fantasy point of view, of who is most likely to get the most yards next season based on their talent or the system or both. This list will include both WR 1 and 2 So ready for the rankings?

Star-divide

1. Andre Johnson: Andre Johnson is a beast. Andre just came off a career year in terms of receiving average. Now in terms of TD receptions, Johnson does not get that many, but thats only one stat, in his 102 games since 03 Johnson has an average of 77.92 yards a game, while Jerry Rice had 79.77 yards per game. And of course everytime Johnson is out on the field the defense must account for him at all times, if not they will be burned...bad. Even if he is accounted for... they will still be burned. Its a very safe bet that he will be great next year. I can see 1450 yards Rec, 12TDs with over 100 Receptions. Oh and I'd would like for all Saints fans to imagine having him as a target for Brees...

2. Wes Welker: If Johnson was a beast, then Welker is the explosive creature. He can run routes, and may not be the fastest guy on the field but can find any hole and break it, which is why he is also on the return teams. Now his placing on this list is dependent on his injury, which I think will be better, or at the least, he will play through it by the first game. I see him having a good year just as last year, and will have a 1250 yard receiving, 14 TDs and 110 receptions.

3. Reggie Wayne: Wayne is a good WR. Now I do believe he looks better thanks to Peyton Manning and his system. But, in my rankings no distinction will be made, just who I think will get so many yards. However, he is very dependable, not missing a game since 2002. Although there is a possibility of him missing a game or two if the legal problems develop. Another 1200 yard season with double digit TDs and 100 Receptions and 3 mistresses will come out (somebody has to try and break Tiger's record).

4. Larry Fitzgerald: Fitzgerald is a great WR who has produced some great numbers and is so far the only player not to succumb to the Madden curse...in the first season. His numbers did decline, but that was more likely due to the fact of Boldin playing almost the entire season compared to previous seasons. Now without Boldin, and Kurt Warner, his numbers are likely to increase as he becomes the WR to throw to for Leinart. He should do pretty good this year, but he will have to watch other teams go to the playoffs this year. He should have a 1200 yard season with 8 TDs and 95 Receptions.

5. Desean Jackson: In terms of talent, I think  hes rated lower then this, however an average of 18.6 yards with only 62 receptions, puts him higher on this list. And on a team with a QB who is unproven as a starter with no other real threat at WR, should produce some numbers next season. 1200 yards with 8 TDs and 80 receptions.

6. Greg Jennings: Jennings produced great numbers last year and the Packers are only looking to improve this year. He will be one of the many to benefit. As Rodger's will throw the ball, look for his numbers to pick up. A 1200 yard season (Am I the only one getting a deja vu feeling?) with about 8 TDs (there it is again) and around 75 receptions (ok it fizzed out).

7. Sidney Rice: The favorite target for Favre last season. Since Favre is coming back (SHOCKER!!!) the old man will probably not like to change it up too much and keep it going, however, Rice is talented and will help him out. I can easily see a 1150-1200 yard season as more teams cover Rice, which will leave guys like Harvin and Shiancoe open. Also can see about 6-7 TDs and about 90 Receptions.

8. Anquan Boldin: Boldin left the Cardinals for the Ravens in the offseason. He left a team with great WR for a bunch of young unproven talent and the old guy in the corner who still thinks he can play. Which means Boldin is now the go to guy for the Raven's offense which is looking to be great this year.  Boldin can easily break 1000 and 1100 is not out of the picture, but 1200 might be. 7 TDs with 100 receptions as the Ravens shift the workload to Boldin and off of Mason.

9. Miles Austin: The only Cowboy upset about Dez Bryant being drafted. Now with Bryant on the team, theres now two possibilities for opposing defenses. A) Cover the new and shiny toy more, or B) cover the veteran that has proven he can catch, and force the rookie to prove hes worth it. Now I'm predicting B will happen and his numbers may tank a bit, but as the season goes by and Bryant proves that Yes is he is the real deal. He will get back in it and produce some numbers but will mostly only get the TDs as he will get over 1000 yards but 12 TDs with 70 Receptions.

10. Roddy White: Now the Falcons suck. But in all seriousness....The Falcons still suck. But really White is a great WR on a team without many receiving threats in the WR position and will be great next season as he goes for a 1200 yard season but only get about 7 TDs and 80 receptions. As a bonus prediction he will get less than 100 yards and no TDs with 8 receptions against the Saints.

11. Randy Moss: Moss is a future HOF, 33 years old and a patriot, New England Patriot that is. He has produced amazing numbers in his career except for his short stint in Oakland (I wonder if he did purple drank as well??). However he's not as young as he used to be, and I think this is gonna be his first year of his decline. Now the decline won't be big but he won't be as explosive as he used to be, as sharp on those turns, etc..But he should have a great season still, and get 1100 yards and 10 TDs with about 70 receptions. As a bonus Moss says something about the team after a tough loss and irk Belichick for the rest of their careers.

12. Marques Colston: Colston is a great receiver and can make some great numbers, unfortunately for him he is in the Saints system of "Everybody gets a turn" and so his numbers suffer when if he was in a different system I think he could produce much higher numbers per season. But alas, hes stuck on the Saints(thank God) pending any contract issues. Colston should get some nice numbers with a 1000 yard season 12 TDs and 75 receptions.

13. Hines Ward: Ward is a great WR who is probably down to his last great season, but there is some good news for him. He is arguably the only good WR on the Steelers. Now the Steelers do have Wallace, but I don't think he will compare to Holmes. This will be Ward's year as WR instead of Holmes, and I think he will do a good job of 1100 yards 7 TDs and 80 receptions.

 

14. Steve Smith: Now Smith had what many would call his breakout year last year going for over 1200 yards last season. And I believe he will do just as great this year. But his TDs will decline. I think he will get 1200 yards and only 4 TDs and will get 100 receptions, as well he will break his arm playing...flag football. (facepalm)

15. Calvin Johnson: To be consistent, I said Stafford will improve as a QB this year. Now saying that, in order for a QB to improve his receivers will have to be there to catch what he throws. (unless the QB can throw the ball then run and catch it (which may be what JaMarcus Russell Was trying to do when he was on purple drank)). Johnson will improve his numbers a bit but he is on the Lions and so will still not have a great season but I can see him getting 1100 yards with 6 TDs and 65 receptions.

Honorary Mentions:

Dez Bryant,Donald Driver, Vincent Jackson,Santonio Holmes, Chad "Look at me, I'm a Diva" Ochocinco

Bryant is a rookie and as I have mentioned before I don't like to rank rookies before they have even played a down, but his success is linked to Dallas' success. Driver will do good and would probably be ranked 16th but since there isn't a 16th he just gets the little ribbon that says honorary mention. Jackson just got suspended for three games so his production will be hurt this year as well. Holmes would make some numbers in NY but he does have a few games hes gotta sit out, so that took him off the list and on the HM. 85 is good and is one of the only receiving threats on the team, but his numbers are starting to take a tumble. He didn't come off that injury too well and I think its affected him and at 32 he has no where to go but down.

 

Well there you have it, the WR rankings from 1-15. I thank you for reading my humble opinions and ask you to come back next week for some good Tight Ends (thats what she said).

EDIT: As was pointed out to me, I ranked Jackson high because he will be the only WR on the Eagles, then ranked Fitzgerald low for the same reason. I was wrong, and moved Fitz from 13 to 4. Thus everyone from 4-12 dropped a rank.

Poll
Where do you think Colston should be ranked in terms of numbers? (Yardage, Receptions, TDs)
Higher
26 votes
Lower
3 votes
Perfect
14 votes
Po-Boy?
13 votes

56 votes | Poll has closed

This FanPost was written by a reader and member of Canal Street Chronicles. It does not necessarily reflect the views of CSC and its staff or editors.

Comment 63 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

More from Canal Street Chronicles

What is Drew Brees Worth?

May 2012 by Dave Cariello - 61 comments

Comments

Display:

Wes Welker #2 is a reach after his injury

Also… Warner or not, Fitzgerald is a top five espec with Boldin now gone

You are my people, you are my crowd, this is our music, we love it loud...

by bondcrash on Jul 14, 2010 7:08 AM CDT reply actions   1 recs

Welker’s likely going to spend the first 6 games of the season on the PUP. He’s still not fully recovered from his injury last year. Solid player when healthy, but definitely ranked too high, in terms of what to expect in 2010.

I’d also be willing to bet a seafood platter at Jack Dempsey’s that Mike Wallace winds up with more receiving yards than Hines Ward this season.

"I was not on the boat in question." -Darren Sharper

by coldpizza on Jul 14, 2010 7:48 AM CDT reply actions   1 recs

Really? I couldn't find much info on Welker's injury.

Where did you read that? If that’s true I will have to drop him off the list. And I will take that platter bet.

by Jon Banks on Jul 14, 2010 8:08 AM CDT up reply actions  

Fanball, Rotoworld … most FF advice site are saying he’s likely to miss a few games.

"I was not on the boat in question." -Darren Sharper

by coldpizza on Jul 14, 2010 8:14 AM CDT up reply actions  

Good news, then. I was mainly just going by what I had read up to this point and his ADP in early mocks. I still think 2 is a bit high, just not anything to squawk about, if he is indeed 100% recovered.

"I was not on the boat in question." -Darren Sharper

by coldpizza on Jul 14, 2010 8:29 AM CDT up reply actions  

Also, no Brandon Marshall in Miami? Henne doesn’t seem like much more of a potential liability than Kolb, imo. Crabtree? The go-to guy in arguably the most WR-friendly offense in the league, aside from the Saints.

"I was not on the boat in question." -Darren Sharper

by coldpizza on Jul 14, 2010 7:53 AM CDT reply actions  

I figured his numbers would not do as well this season in Miami's system compared to the Broncos.

Crabtree was great in college but I’m not sure about him, I might be wrong (and I will probably be wrong) but I think he will not be that great this year.

by Jon Banks on Jul 14, 2010 8:12 AM CDT up reply actions  

Crabtree’s due for a Colston type year statistically, imo. Not monster numbers, as they spread it around, but he should be solid, especially with a full training camp under his belt. Marshall’s a freak of nature and you have to figure in at least two shootouts with the Patriots. The biggest question there, at least in my mind, is his commitment to being the best WR he can be. He’s been a perennial slacker and a malcontent thusfar. Just thinking the change of scenery will light a fire under his butt.

"I was not on the boat in question." -Darren Sharper

by coldpizza on Jul 14, 2010 8:24 AM CDT up reply actions  

Fitzgerald that low??

He’s one of the most dominating receivers in the league and Breaston is a decent #2 to take some heat off him. If anyone can make Leinart look good it’s him. You have Desean Jackson at #4 and Kolb will be throwing to him with even less experience than Leinart. And Jackson is NOT the receiver Fitzgerald is.

by Alex Saints on Jul 14, 2010 8:01 AM CDT reply actions  

When I thought about it your right. That was inconsistent of me.

If I put Jackson high, then I need to put Fitzgerald higher. 2 mistakes in 2 hours, bad start to this one.

by Jon Banks on Jul 14, 2010 8:09 AM CDT up reply actions  

What about the Giants’ Steve Smith?

"I was not on the boat in question." -Darren Sharper

by coldpizza on Jul 14, 2010 8:18 AM CDT reply actions  

He's the Smith I mentioned at 14.

I just wanted to make fun of the other Smith’s…misfortune. In case you think he’s low I have him low because I don’t think he will be utilized in the redzone and won’t score many TDs.

by Jon Banks on Jul 14, 2010 8:21 AM CDT up reply actions  

You said this list was based on who would get the most yards in your introduction. Are TDs factored in or not?

"I was not on the boat in question." -Darren Sharper

by coldpizza on Jul 14, 2010 8:25 AM CDT up reply actions  

Yes they are, receptions, TDs.

I include all numbers I predict. Instead of yards I should have said numbers.

by Jon Banks on Jul 14, 2010 8:35 AM CDT up reply actions  

Honorable Mention

To Meach. He had a breakout year last year, and even though it seems homeristic, he has proven himself as a dependable option and a more consistent deep threat than Henderson and any unproven rookie on your list. While I don’t think he deserves a top 15 rank just quite yet, I do think and honorable mention should go out to him.

Underestimate No One, Take Nothing For Granted

by SaintsFanInIraq on Jul 14, 2010 11:02 AM CDT reply actions  

Feel that Megatron is a bit too low. (Calvin Johnson)

You say his numbers will improve a bit to 65 receptions and 1100 yards and 6 tds. The thing is, i think you paid attention (whether you did or not feel free to correct me) to his overall stats last year but didn’t account for the fact he missed a few games. If you calculate his stats out for a full 16 games he would have had roughly 75 receptions for 1125 yards.

With a second year with Stafford and an improved receiving corps around him, numbers comparable to his second year seem much more likely in my opinion. Aka 80 receptions for just over 1300 yards and potential double digit TDs.

by jeff.l.b on Jul 14, 2010 12:04 PM CDT reply actions  

Ahh missed that little piece of info.

well he might get 1200 yards but im not sure about double digit TDs.

by Jon Banks on Jul 14, 2010 2:38 PM CDT up reply actions  

Just saying it’s possible, man did bring down 12 TDs when he had someone opposite him to draw a bit of coverage. I’d expect him in the 8-10 range this year personally, assuming he stays healthy.

by jeff.l.b on Jul 14, 2010 3:08 PM CDT up reply actions  

Now that I could see. And I think that has a good chance of happening.

Dude’s good. But come on. Who else is there in Detroit to cover besides CJ?

by Jon Banks on Jul 14, 2010 3:11 PM CDT up reply actions  

Nate Burleson, Bryant Johnson, and TE Tony Scheffler. They also have Jesus1000, so beware.

I sure like dat candy
I don't go for dem turnip greens

by stujo4 on Jul 14, 2010 3:52 PM CDT up reply actions  

and TE Brandon Pettigrew

"Do not anticipate trouble or worry about what may never happen. Keep in the sunlight. " ~Benjamin Franklin

by Dan Kelly on Jul 14, 2010 4:07 PM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

On a separate note

I think people are over estimating Miles Austin. His numbers i felt were caused by two significant factors. One being Jason Witten…man’s a beast he pulls coverage. Two, he was the only receiver for the cowboys last year who knew what a route was. Dez Bryant is a heck of a route runner who i think will excel. Not first team all pro mind you, but still excel as a rookie. Because of this i would expect Austin’s numbers to not be as great as people think, just because less balls will go his way.

by jeff.l.b on Jul 14, 2010 3:10 PM CDT up reply actions  

Hmm

Guess you thought the same thing. Was just thrown off by how high you had him rated.

by jeff.l.b on Jul 14, 2010 3:11 PM CDT up reply actions  

Yeah thought the exact same thing.

I live outside cowboy country and have talked to them. They have said Austin is the only thing on WR. And even then he’s not all that good. Bryant is great, but there is no way of knowing if he will come to the NFL as Andre Johnson, or Brandon Marshall.

by Jon Banks on Jul 14, 2010 3:13 PM CDT up reply actions  

^right

Me and my error issues today

by Jon Banks on Jul 14, 2010 4:39 PM CDT up reply actions  

Dez's number will come from Clayton and Roy Williams expense.

Miles didnt even start til week 5. He may pull in a few less per game but he will have 5 more games. Dallas has also been working him in the slot to create mismatches.
I believe Romo and Garrett(OC) are studing the Saints film for clues on how to make everyone happy.

Ability is a poor mans wealth.
The main ingredient of stardom is the rest of the team.
Talent is God given, Be humble. Fame is man given, Be grateful. Conceit is self-given, Be careful.
-John Wooden-

by squidlo97 on Jul 16, 2010 5:04 PM CDT up reply actions  

I don't agree

you got 5 WR in the top ten that are either coming back from serious injury or with a different Qb! Welker is trying to come back way too soon, Jackson has lingering injuries, Sydney Rice is injured also. Fitzgerald has a new unproven Qb as with Jackson and Anquain Bolden who is now with a running team. IMO all of these are @ least 5 to 10 spots too high.

by shn_hldn on Jul 14, 2010 3:13 PM CDT reply actions  

And what if T.O. goes to Pats? Does that drop his numbers?

by shn_hldn on Jul 14, 2010 4:52 PM CDT up reply actions  

9. Miles Austin: The only Cowboy upset about Dez Bryant

If he is #9 why would he be upset?

by shn_hldn on Jul 14, 2010 3:18 PM CDT reply actions  

I know you did not just leave Carolina's Steve Smith off that list.

Man … lol. This is about the …. Are you serious? Smith does things no other receiver in NFL history can do. He makes catches and runs after the catch that make other elite receivers’ season look boring. Watch a highlight reel. I don’t care how old he is this season, he is still a top 3 or 4 receiver, just like DeAngelo Williams should be a top 3 or 4 running back on that other list.

stuff 'bout stuff.

by silver82blade on Jul 14, 2010 7:07 PM CDT reply actions  

nm thats other Steve Smith. lol

by shn_hldn on Jul 14, 2010 7:12 PM CDT up reply actions  

And Matt Moore should be a Top 3 or 4 QB huh?

Because he can do things no other QB can do, he can read a defense and throw the ball. Look, your a homer. I get that. I can be one to. But not every player on your team is top 3 or 4 just because he is on your team. Smith is good. But on a team with Jonathan Stewart and Deangelo Williams. Smith will probably get the same numbers as last year. And in case you forgot, didn’t Smith break his arm playing flag football?

by Jon Banks on Jul 14, 2010 8:00 PM CDT up reply actions  

Oh, c'mon with that homer stuff.

How will Steve Smith have the same numbers as last year? Delhomme was awful last year, and he didn’t even play in all the games with Moore. Smith would only have the same numbers if Moore has a 54.9 QB rating, like Delhomme had, and Smith misses one and a half games, like last year. And, I’ll reiterate, he still had 982 yards. The lowest guy on your list, you’re predicting 1100 for, and Smith still isn’t in the honorable mentions section. That doesn’t seem out of whack to you? You’re telling me I’m biased. I think you’re the biased one. In 2008, Smith went over 1400 yards in 14 games. He’s gone over 1000 yards in every year since, and including, 2005. In fact, in ‘05 he went over 1500 and won the receiving triple crown. To say he won’t beat out the 15th ranked guy statistically, if he stays healthy, is just biased stuff. Now, if you’re predicting he gets injured somehow, then that’s a different story. You should put that in the article though; Steve Smith is exempt because of some injury he’ll endure.

stuff 'bout stuff.

by silver82blade on Jul 14, 2010 8:11 PM CDT up reply actions  

Don't agree with ME on it.

I didn’t say he should be on the honorable mentions list. I said he should be in the top 3 or 4. I’m just going to have to agree to disagree with you on this one.

stuff 'bout stuff.

by silver82blade on Jul 14, 2010 8:53 PM CDT up reply actions  

I mean this with the utmost respect

Due to recent injury and LARGE QUANTITIES OF STUPIDITY, I feel that leaving him off the list is acceptable. The first time I looked and didn’t see him, I actually caught myself asking why he would be left off. Then I remembered that HE BROKE HIS ARM IN THE OFFSEASON PLAYING FLAG FOOTBALL Sorry, but any amount of stupidity, mixed with the toughness of breaking an arm in a non-contact version of the game he gets payed to play, really leaves his health concerns up in the air. Delhomme was a creature of habit, so when he had no where else to go, he would throw it in the area of Smith. That does not automatically mean that Moore will be able to throw Smith the ball while he hands off to Smash and Dash. With all of these factors calculated in, he doesn’t need to be on the list right now. I say by midseason, we re-evaluate this list to see how it stacks up.

Underestimate No One, Take Nothing For Granted

by SaintsFanInIraq on Jul 14, 2010 10:36 PM CDT up reply actions  

That's mostly my list anyway

A prediction post at training camp for us to get our ideas out and then laugh and make fun of each other when those predictions fall flat.

by Jon Banks on Jul 14, 2010 10:48 PM CDT up reply actions  

I don’t think a lapse of judgment (playing flag football) should affect his fantasy football ranking. The two things are unrelated, unless you’re saying he’s stupid in general; meaning he doesn’t know much about any subject, including football. I think you’d be pretty wrong about that.

I’m a little concerned about a second break myself. However, like I said, if he was left off because of a potential injury he hasn’t even incurred yet, it should be noted in the article he was left off due to potential injury concerns.

I’m not sure what you’re talking about with Delhomme and Moore. Are you trying to say you think Moore will hand off more and not throw as many passes as Delhomme did? I’d take exception to that.

stuff 'bout stuff.

by silver82blade on Jul 14, 2010 11:04 PM CDT up reply actions  

Well

Actually, I think that Carolina’s run will improve this year. Call me crazy, but I think that Moore is still in transition. He has a long way to go. Delhomme fell apart, and ended up out on his @$$. Moore still has a lot to learn and I think that Carolina will have him hand the ball off a little less throughout the season as he gets more comfortable leading the team. Carolina is run heavy and they have the backs and the line geared to be run heavy.

As far as Smith is concerned, I think he did something extremely stupid. He jeopardized his season for a flag football game. This is the second time he has broken his arm in a year, so he obviously was not at 100% and should have been nursing himself a little better and thinking of his team mates that depend on him to be there. If Smith goes down, your only prove WR and most dangerous receiving weapon is renderedus useless. I know this is hard for you to sit back and hear, because I have been there with my boys before, but common sense should tell you that Smith is an injury concern, and a risk to his team as of right now. I don’t think his body or his mental readiness will be 100% on opening day.

Underestimate No One, Take Nothing For Granted

by SaintsFanInIraq on Jul 15, 2010 11:25 AM CDT up reply actions  

I agree he is an injury risk.

Two broken arms in succession like that is concerning. However, he was 100% when he broke it the second time. It broke in a different place. It’s not like he re-injured the original break. I think it was just one of those freak accidents, like lightning striking you twice. Or, maybe he has some kind of health problem dealing with the hardness of his bones. I don’t know. I’m not a doctor.

I don’t think you’d get anyone to agree with you if he’d be mentally ready though. Smith always gets fired up for games. That’s what he lives for. That’s why he was out there playing flag football in the first place. His mind will be fine.

I don’t think they baby Matt Moore. Delhomme was doing awful last year and they kept letting him throw. They don’t change their game plans as long as a quarterback is on the field. They’ll do the same old stuff. Run run, pass. Run, run, pass. Run, run (oops, third and long), draw run. Lol. I hate when they run on 3rd and long.

stuff 'bout stuff.

by silver82blade on Jul 15, 2010 12:41 PM CDT up reply actions  

Call me crazy

You’re crazy.

The order is rapidly fadin’
And the first one now will later be last

by stujo4 on Jul 15, 2010 3:04 PM CDT up reply actions  

You’re crazy man. You’re crazy. I like you, but you’re crazy.

"Do not anticipate trouble or worry about what may never happen. Keep in the sunlight. " ~Benjamin Franklin

by Dan Kelly on Jul 15, 2010 3:21 PM CDT up reply actions  

I find your "homer" comment quite confusing.

You’re basically saying forget being a “homer” when it comes to Moore. That’s your thoughts of Smith being a top 3-4 Wide out has nothing to do with that. Yet every…and i do mean EVERY single Fantasy and non-fantasy projections and information for WRs in the incoming year have Steve Smith ranked anywhere from 9 -15.

There is no logic what so ever anymore to say that Steve Smith is a top 5 wide out. Now i for one still believe that Smith is a near top 10 wide receiver. Personally i’d rank him anywhere from 8-12 depending on how much i want to dip him for coming off an injury with an unknown QB (and before you start on Moore not being an unknown QB, you have to know being in Panther fan that there is already a HUGE push going on for Clausen to potentially start). Do i think he is deserving to be on this list? Absolutely, no doubt about it. A ranking in the top 3-4, however, is about as homer as they come. Even Smith earlier this year eluded to the fact that he was slowing down and needed someone to step up and help groom on the opposite side from him. There’s nothing wrong with great players, and Steve Smith was indeed great, getting older and slowing a step in production. You need to realize that i think. Still, 100% deserving of being on this list.

by jeff.l.b on Jul 15, 2010 11:37 AM CDT up reply actions  

I hear that Clausen would be 3rd string?

by shn_hldn on Jul 15, 2010 11:55 AM CDT up reply actions  

It was only 2 seasons ago that Steve Smith was 3rd in receiving yardage, behind only Larry Fitzgerald and Andre Johnson, and he only played in 14 games! How is there “no logic whatsoever anymore to say that Steve Smith is a top 5 wide out”? You think from 29 to 31 he’s lost so much talent that it knocks him out of the top 5? You might be right, but I think I have an equal chance of being right.

I don’t even think Clausen starting is a conversation going on within the Panthers’ organization. It’s clearly Moore’s job to lose. I think he’ll be on a shorter leash than Delhomme was, but he’ll certainly start the first game.

stuff 'bout stuff.

by silver82blade on Jul 15, 2010 12:54 PM CDT up reply actions  

“It was only 2 seasons ago that Steve Smith was 3rd in receiving yardage, behind only Larry Fitzgerald and Andre Johnson, and he only played in 14 games!”

It was only 2 seasons ago that Clinton Portis, Thomas Jones, Steve Slaton, Matt Forte and LaDainian Tomlinson were all Top 10 RBs. How many of those five do you think will be among the Top 10 rushers of 2010?

"I was not on the boat in question." -Darren Sharper

by coldpizza on Jul 15, 2010 1:11 PM CDT up reply actions  

What’s wrong with Clinton Portis and Thomas Jones? Jones had 1400 rushing yards just last year. Slaton is not an established star at his position like Steve Smith is. He has to have more than one good year to be expected to have them consistently. Forte was never that great. He only got 1200 rushing yards in ’08 due to a massive number of carries. His rushing average is quite mediocre. Tomlinson was already on the decline in 2008. He had under 4 yards per carry.

stuff 'bout stuff.

by silver82blade on Jul 15, 2010 1:50 PM CDT up reply actions  

Clinton has a lot of competition for carries…. and might have even more if they sign Westbrook, like some “experts” think they could.

I think Jones has the best shot at being good this season (he’s a VERY good running back), but he’s on a new team and will likely be splitting carries with Jamaal Charles.

"Do not anticipate trouble or worry about what may never happen. Keep in the sunlight. " ~Benjamin Franklin

by Dan Kelly on Jul 15, 2010 2:04 PM CDT up reply actions  

You’re only counting one factor. You said yourself that in 2 years time has he lost enough talent to possibly knock him out of the top 5. The thing is, that you’re also not paying attention to the emergence of talent in the last two years that also contributes to players falling. Slight advancement in age PLUS the emergence of young stars such as Johnson, Fitz, Jackson, Jennings, Rice, Austin, White etc also play a very important role. Add both of those together, and the chances of Steve Smith remaining a top 5 WR greatly decrease. He has the savvy and route running capabilities to keep him in the top 10, however.

by jeff.l.b on Jul 15, 2010 2:23 PM CDT up reply actions  

As I have said many times. My rankings are of stats not of talent.

Talent, yes Smith is top 10 easy. But in terms of numbers I don’t think Carolina will be passing this year, and his numbers will decline so that’s why I don’t have him on my list. And it is why many talented players get left off such as Brandon Marshall.

by Jon Banks on Jul 15, 2010 2:29 PM CDT up reply actions  

I like your guy and would take him in the top5 if I was picking a team for 1 year and could pick my QB.

Smith worries me though because he is missing valuble time with new QBs. That hurts.

Ability is a poor mans wealth.
The main ingredient of stardom is the rest of the team.
Talent is God given, Be humble. Fame is man given, Be grateful. Conceit is self-given, Be careful.
-John Wooden-

by squidlo97 on Jul 16, 2010 5:07 PM CDT up reply actions  

Reggie Wayne at number 3?

No way, Jose. Collie, Garçon and Gonzalez (Geaux Samuel Giguère!!!) will take away a lot of balls from him.

I’m pretty sure Manning and the Colts are getting fed up with that brand new prima donna attitude. Skipping mandatory while he still have two years on his contract, making weird choices in his private life and not standing out in the Super Bowl ain’t getting him much love for sure.

Yo Reggie, Marvin Harrison sat out last year…

Repeat? Under construction...

by FrenchFreak on Jul 14, 2010 9:15 PM CDT reply actions  

I think Boldin is rated way to high. He benefitted from Fitz way more than Fitz benifitted from Boldin.

When Fitzgerald was out, Boldinn got the top CB and the double if necessary. He disappeared as the number 1 guy. Fitz didnt miss a beat when Boldin was out. Fitz can beat most number 1 CBs often and beat double teams a lot.
I also think Desean is to high. He is great with the deep ball but everything else needs worse. He disappearred in the 2 Dallas games at the end of the season. I like him but I want my top 15 to have a better rounded game.

That was nit picking I admit, overall I think you did a good job. Its very subjective but you have a good argument for most.

Ability is a poor mans wealth.
The main ingredient of stardom is the rest of the team.
Talent is God given, Be humble. Fame is man given, Be grateful. Conceit is self-given, Be careful.
-John Wooden-

by squidlo97 on Jul 16, 2010 5:15 PM CDT reply actions  

Thank you for the kind words.

I agree with Jackson not being top 5 talent. But in terms of numbers I think he will be in the top 5 towards the end. And Boldin will benefit from the Raven’s running game I believe. I saw that you were a cowboys fan so I figured I’d ask, how do you feel about Austin’s ranking?

by Jon Banks on Jul 16, 2010 7:07 PM CDT up reply actions  

Greg Jennings is the 6th best FFL receiver?!?!?

WTF? If this guy produces enough points to be the 6th best receiver in FFL, i might jump off the superdome.

by jray2000 on Jul 17, 2010 4:39 PM CDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

The ultimate community for lovers of all things Black and Gold! The latest news, commentary, discussion, linkage and more! Join in the conversation now with all of your fellow Who Dats!

Featured Poll

Poll
How much do you think Drew Brees is worth per year? (avg. over life of contract)
Less than $17M
152 votes
$17M
52 votes
$18M
136 votes
$19M
183 votes
$20M
575 votes
$21M
212 votes
$22M
98 votes
$23M
523 votes

1931 votes | Poll has closed

Twitter-logo_medium


Head Coach

Erindavewhodat_small Dave Cariello

Assistant Coach (Editor/Contributor)

13088_f520_small David "Satch" Kelly

0113wbphillips_small Hans Petersen

Offensive Coordinators (Contributors)

Saintslogo_small Andrew Juge

Titans_small Jack Sharkey

316807_10150333101899753_504374752_8049350_806276562_n_small Alex Swift

Squat_small Preston J. Gary, Jr.

100media36imag0036_small Travis Dauro

Vgfl_logo_small_small Adesola Badon

Small Jimmy Angel

Small Jordan Katz

Small Win Ellington

Super-bowl-44_small Wallace Delery

Thomas_photo_small Thomas Hukel

Angrywhodat-saints-gold-50pct-bright-grey-outline_small_small The Angry Who Dat