Rivals.com has an article by Holly Anderson that strikes me as being awfully petty. I'm sure some will disagree with my assessment.
Ok, so they changed the number on the cover from 7 to 6. WOW~! Now THAT is newsworthy? I think this is petty reporting because:
A: How many people will have a copy of this magazine compared to how many have now seen the link on Yahoo Home Page?
B: Of the people who actually have a copy, how many will look at the number "6" and know if it includes Reggie Bush or not?
"late-breaking revisionism" / "overnight" Isn't that just a spectacular way of saying, "They changed the 7 to a 6 yesterday."
I really don't care if Reggie keeps his trophy or not but, c'mon, media. Give it a rest already. Jeeeeeeeez!