Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: VIDEO: Austin Rivers' Buzzer Beater Finishes Off UNC

Three Current Saints Injury Concerns

Yesterday Saints fans got some good news regarding Jonathan Vilma's groin injury, learning that the team expects him to be ready to play by September 9th for the regular season opener against the Vikings. That, however, is one of a few injury-related trepidations the Saints have right now. With the regular season just around the corner, they become ever more serious.

I figured it would be therapeutic if I collect all of the current Saints injury concerns all in one place so we can talk it out and try to work through this emotional time together. By my count, there are three significant worries, each of varying gravity and importance. After reading be sure to comment, comment and comment some more. If I missed a player with an injury that has you nervous, go ahead and throw it out there. 

Star-divide

Is Vilma's injury really not that serious?

The latest on Jonathan Vilma's groin is that it doesn't require sports hernia surgery and that he'll only be out a week, ready to go for the home opener against the Vikings. In Payton's words...

I think we're optimistic that he's gonna be able to start up practice when we get going Sunday of next week.    

That's great news. But since the status of Vilma's injury could be a factor when the regular season begins, the Sean Payton B.S. Meter needs to be dusted off and switched back on. I'm not saying the current timetable for Vilma isn't accurate or that he won't be back next week, I just know that pretty soon the games are going to start counting and Sean Payton is a master at the art of football espionage. Everything he says should be taken with a grain of salt. 

Assuming Vilma is ready in time to face off against Brett Favre and the Vikings, will it be at full strength? How effective will he be? What worries me considerably more is that groin injuries tend to linger, taking a long time to fully go away. Could Vilma be hampered, at least slightly, by this injury for a better part of the season? So many questions!

 

When will Darren Sharper and Clint Ingram come off the PUP list?

I've got to admit I underestimated both Sharper and Ingram's recovery time and didn't think we'd even be having this discussion. With only nine days until the season opener and neither having seen the field yet this pre-season, I'm starting to get nervous that they both may have to start the season on the PUP list. That would mean they would have to miss the first six weeks of the season, regardless of whether they're healthy enough to play before then. Or the Saints could cut either or both of them and hope to bring them back when healthy. 

 

Did Jimmy Graham's injury set him back?

The good news is that Graham finally returned to practice this week after an ankle injury. The bad news is that he missed the two weeks prior, valuable time lost. Many continue to tout Graham as the future tight end of this franchise but other than some nice showings during practice, we haven't seen much to prove that. Two weeks of pre-season reps seems a lot to  miss, especially for a rookie with only one year of college football experience under his belt. But has the time he missed cost him a spot on the roster this year or moved him down on the depth chart? Or is he such a natural talent he'll fit right in quickly? 

Comment 107 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

IMO, I think they are leaning more to cutting Sharper and Ingram than putting them on the PUP list for 6 weeks. I think they want them available before 6 weeks, if possible. And, I think they’re wasting their time with Ingram if he hasn’t seen the field yet.

See also this: http://www.canalstreetchronicles.com/2010/8/31/1660242/on-monday-coach-sean-payton-could#comments

by BRSaintsFan on Aug 31, 2010 6:19 AM CDT reply actions  

Agree. Very unlikely they make the 53 on Saturday, especially Ingram

You are my people, you are my crowd, this is our music, we love it loud...

by bondcrash on Aug 31, 2010 8:39 AM CDT up reply actions  

Agree to disagree

Ingram will be cut. They’ll keep Sharper even if just for mentoring and the hope that he’ll get better. It’s not like Jenkins can learn everything from Usama Young about the FS position….

Devery Henderson, making absurd grabs for my teams since 2001.

Previously "LSUFAN."

by LSU FAN on Aug 31, 2010 12:33 PM CDT up reply actions  

And I meant to use this account.

by Andrew Tessier on Aug 31, 2010 12:36 PM CDT up reply actions  

Satch! Help a brother out....

Tell Andrew (and others who may be interested) how you changes your screenname, without losing all your stats?

Want to go to the Saints vs. Cowboys game? I've got an extra ticket.

by Dan Kelly on Aug 31, 2010 12:58 PM CDT up reply actions  

Email me

I have to have the higher ups do it on their end.

Wanna say something? Sign up! It's free!

by Dave Cariello on Aug 31, 2010 1:22 PM CDT up reply actions  

Thanks

I emailed SBnation and they got it to work out. Just forgot to have my computer not autologin as LSU FAN. Thanks Dan and Dave

Devery Henderson, making absurd grabs for my teams since 2001.

by Andrew Tessier on Aug 31, 2010 1:38 PM CDT up reply actions  

Hope this isn't a new trend.

I already have trouble keeping my “to read or not” list accurate :)

Repeat? Under construction...

by FrenchFreak on Aug 31, 2010 8:56 PM CDT up reply actions  

Double personnality...

I love it!

Repeat? Under construction...

by FrenchFreak on Aug 31, 2010 8:53 PM CDT up reply actions  

Let me amend this:

I think they think they can reclaim Sharper after they cut him. Ingram, I don’t see why.

by BRSaintsFan on Aug 31, 2010 2:23 PM CDT up reply actions  

I thought the same thing regarding Vilma's injury--

I HOPE it’s not that serious. I know what Payton said, but my BS monitor is on alert so I take it with a grain of salt. I won’t turn off the monitor until I see him take the field against the Vikes.

I also see them considering cutting Sharper since there wasn’t much interest in him from other teams in the off-season. Depending on the unknown injury factor, they might be able to bring him back later if needed.

"It's about time that something good like this happened." - Drew Brees

by SaintsFanMD on Aug 31, 2010 6:42 AM CDT reply actions  

"I think we're optimistic"

I “think”? That is Sean Payton Double Speak for, “I hope my novenas pay off!”

Am I worried? Yeah, I think so.

Fat, dumb, and happy. Hell, two out of three ain't bad!

I Want To Die In My Sleep Like My Grandpa – Not Screaming and Yelling Like His Passengers.

by Just 'Nother Day on Aug 31, 2010 7:17 AM CDT reply actions  

By the way,

Fat, dumb, and happy. Hell, two out of three ain't bad!

I Want To Die In My Sleep Like My Grandpa – Not Screaming and Yelling Like His Passengers.

by Just 'Nother Day on Aug 31, 2010 7:17 AM CDT reply actions  

Ooops, wrong key ~

By the way, what happend to Shockey in the San Diego game? I tuned in just when you guys were talking about him taking a really big hit. Then, I didn’t see him in the game anymore and nobody said anything else about it.

 Is my Shockey-poo otay?

Fat, dumb, and happy. Hell, two out of three ain't bad!

I Want To Die In My Sleep Like My Grandpa – Not Screaming and Yelling Like His Passengers.

by Just 'Nother Day on Aug 31, 2010 7:19 AM CDT up reply actions  

I think the hit was on his one catch of the game. My first thought was that he just got his bell rung. It didn’t look all that serious.

"I want to hand this trophy to the MVP of the Super Bowl -- and the MVP of the entire league.''
-- Saints coach Sean Payton, handing the Vince Lombardi Trophy to Drew Brees after Super Bowl 44.

by VAsaintsfan on Aug 31, 2010 7:28 AM CDT up reply actions  

Thanks.

Fat, dumb, and happy. Hell, two out of three ain't bad!

I Want To Die In My Sleep Like My Grandpa – Not Screaming and Yelling Like His Passengers.

by Just 'Nother Day on Aug 31, 2010 3:24 PM CDT up reply actions  

There was a shot with him laughing on the sidelines toward the end… he’s allright

You are my people, you are my crowd, this is our music, we love it loud...

by bondcrash on Aug 31, 2010 8:36 AM CDT up reply actions  

Thanks.

Fat, dumb, and happy. Hell, two out of three ain't bad!

I Want To Die In My Sleep Like My Grandpa – Not Screaming and Yelling Like His Passengers.

by Just 'Nother Day on Aug 31, 2010 3:24 PM CDT up reply actions  

There was a shot with him laughing on the sidelines toward the end… he’s allright

You are my people, you are my crowd, this is our music, we love it loud...

by bondcrash on Aug 31, 2010 8:36 AM CDT up reply actions  

Ditto.

Fat, dumb, and happy. Hell, two out of three ain't bad!

I Want To Die In My Sleep Like My Grandpa – Not Screaming and Yelling Like His Passengers.

by Just 'Nother Day on Aug 31, 2010 3:24 PM CDT up reply actions  

I'm not too worried about Vilma

Taking a helmet to the groin isn’t easy to walk off, but most of the time it isn’t something that’s going to have a long term impact. Ingram and Sharper are the ones that get to me. Not seeing anything from them at all makes me wonder just how bad things are.

"I want to hand this trophy to the MVP of the Super Bowl -- and the MVP of the entire league.''
-- Saints coach Sean Payton, handing the Vince Lombardi Trophy to Drew Brees after Super Bowl 44.

by VAsaintsfan on Aug 31, 2010 7:25 AM CDT reply actions  

It would have a long-term impact on me!

Namely, I think I’d be reconsidering my chosen profession…ouch! Course, they get paid enough to make it worthwhile to endure some pain.

"It's about time that something good like this happened." - Drew Brees

by SaintsFanMD on Aug 31, 2010 8:13 AM CDT up reply actions  

Vilma is more worrisome...

Don’t get me wrong, I love Sharper for what he did for us last year (Anytime someone sets a record in a Saints uniform is pretty awesome), but we switched Malcolm Jenkins there for a reason…to play. You don’t push a 1st round draft pick to another position unless it’s for him to suit up sooner rather than later. I haven’t been able to catch much of the pre-season games, but I read that he’s been seeing all the 1st team snaps. Let Sharper take his time coming back, even if that means starting the season on the PUP.

Vilma is what has me worried. Groin injuries take a looooong time to go away. Especially for someone who has to explode from side to side so often and then hammer a 215 lb running back on a weekly basis. Even if he plays, how well can he play?

Ingram, I’m not really concerned with…cut him if we have to. Everyone seems to be happy with what Casillas and Dunbar bring to the table so his injury won’t be causing any heart distress here. Sharper is on par with some major heartburn while Vilma’s injury is more like how I feel after a drunken McDonald’s run at 2:30 in the morning. “Oh this isn’t going to end well…”

by SxSnts9 on Aug 31, 2010 8:24 AM CDT reply actions  

I think having Vilma ready for Vikes is a "best case" scenario

I, too worry about the lingering effects of a not fully healed groin (or lower abductor), or a longer rehab time…

hope for the best – prepare yourself for the worst!

It's gonna be a great year.

by HansDat on Aug 31, 2010 2:38 PM CDT up reply actions  

Graham

There’s no way he would clear waivers imo. Either IR, which doesnt look the case now, or buried in the depth chart . Yeah is a shame… he will get his first reps at the end of first blowout…

You are my people, you are my crowd, this is our music, we love it loud...

by bondcrash on Aug 31, 2010 8:38 AM CDT reply actions  

Funny how I mentioned the possibility of Sharper not making the final 53 man roster when he signed, and everyone else balked at that notion.

"I was not on the boat in question" -Darren Sharper

by coldpizza on Aug 31, 2010 10:07 AM CDT reply actions  

Still balking

I refuse to believe he is going to get released. I want to see the Sharper Shake this season (in Black and Gold).

Football is easy if you're crazy as hell

by Grumps on Aug 31, 2010 10:13 AM CDT up reply actions  

I kind of agreed with you. He’s old coming off major, major knee surgery that even when young, takes a solid year under you to get back to form.

by jeff.l.b on Aug 31, 2010 10:37 AM CDT up reply actions  

He’s the B**** F**** of safeties.

Old, yes. Injured, yes.

Can still play at a Super Bowl level when healthy, yes.

I think he’s got 10 + 3 more games left in the tank… but, I’m not a trainer/coach/doctor for the Saints, so what do I know.

I think the most likely scenario is 6 week PUP list for Sharp.

Want to go to the Saints vs. Cowboys game? I've got an extra ticket.

by Dan Kelly on Aug 31, 2010 1:01 PM CDT up reply actions  

Oddly enough

…in Sharper’s case, getting cut might be a sign the Saints want him. If they stash him on IR, his career is essentially over. Put him on the PUP list to begin the season, and they lose his services for six weeks. But if they cut him, they can bring him back earlier, provided he’s healthy…and the only risk they take is that someone else might sign him before we can re-sign him. Considering that he got no interest in the offseason, that’s a rather small chance.

Plus, I believe there’s a roster bonus involved. (Do you get that if you’re on the PUP list? Probably not, but I don’t know.) If it means freeing up a roster spot until Sharper may be healthy enough to recall, and saving some money at the same time, there’s little question what PayLoo is going to do. But still, they might not do it yet.

It was worth the wait.

by MtnExile on Aug 31, 2010 10:37 AM CDT reply actions  

Exactly my thinking regarding Sharper

I see them taking a chance and cutting him, then picking him back up later. Hopefully another team won’t suffer a rash of injuries at safety, which might be the only danger.

"It's about time that something good like this happened." - Drew Brees

by SaintsFanMD on Aug 31, 2010 11:10 AM CDT up reply actions  

Interesting scenario, for sure...

They did it before with Hollis Thomas.

Would Shaper sign with another team? is there any interest from other teams?

Want to go to the Saints vs. Cowboys game? I've got an extra ticket.

by Dan Kelly on Aug 31, 2010 1:03 PM CDT up reply actions  

Clever thinking.

That actually makes a ton of sense. But at the same time, if they intend to cut him and bring him back in week 4, why would they take that risk/lose his mentoring just to keep one other guy on the roster for just 3 weeks?

Devery Henderson, making absurd grabs for my teams since 2001.

by Andrew Tessier on Aug 31, 2010 1:42 PM CDT up reply actions  

Not too worried about the injuries

I never expected Sharper to play except in backup duty later in the season. Vilma injury isn’t serious, and worse case he might miss a game or two. Last but not least, i don’t think anyone expect Graham to overly contribute, especially early in the season. All in all, things could be much, much worse.

by jeff.l.b on Aug 31, 2010 10:38 AM CDT reply actions  

In no way am I medically qualified , but....

An impact injury to a muscle heals quicker than a strain and has
less lingering implications. Again I am not an expert but it seems
if the injury was caused by a helmet to groin impact (yikes , my eyes
are watering at the thought) then after the shock and bruising has
abated then he should be OK to go……..fingers crossed.

Aints no more

by saint_chew on Aug 31, 2010 11:21 AM CDT reply actions  

I've got a hypothesis

Maybe somebody can find the answer.
I’ve heard it suggested by players/coaches and even the media that a higher rate of injuries occurs in the preseason than the regular season. I think that this could be true.
The reasoning may be that players aren’t participating at ‘meaningful game’ intensity. Maybe more inexperienced players are on the field at a time. Maybe players get lulled to sleep with ‘vanilla’ tactics and then are more off guard picking up an unexpected blitz etc. Perhaps you have a vet trying just not to get injured going up against an upstart trying to make a name for himself. Or a rookie not picking up a blitz in the backfield and the QB getting rocked. I don’t know if it makes a difference, but I know that these things are taking place in the preseason.
I know one thing: preseason injuries make me sick.
I think a little too much is being made around here of ‘the evaluation process’ that occurs in preseason games. Almost every starter on our roster was decided before preseason. Only LB and 3rd running back were truly up for grabs. You can’t tell me that essentially an hour of pregame film on a player is going to undo weeks of practice and scrimmage evaluation.
It’s nice that we found out that Ivory can play. It sucks that Hamilton (who would have won the short yardage role) is injured/done for season. It sucks that PJ is injured/done for season. It sucks that Graham was injured. It sucks that in our pregame evaluation of a thin crop of LBs there was an injury to Vilma (the only LB worth a damn and probably the MVP of our defense). And what did we gain?—tKnowledge that the fifth running back can play. LB is still a question. And Graham is going to be a stud (which we knew from practice, not preseason games)
Look at Mcnabb and Campbell getting injured on sacks on blitzes that were not picked up. The Redskins and Raiders won’t have their starting QBs on opening day, but by damn they’ll know who the third string TE is going to be.
The preseason is antiquated. Back in the day, Kenny stabler may have needed 4 preseason games to sober up for the regular season. Todays year-round athletes do not. The preseason is an injury waiting to happen. Injuries are part of football, let’s let them happen on meaningful games. No matter where you stand on an 18 game regular season, isn’t it time to shorten the preseason?

In Breesus' name we play

by Breesus Christ Superstar on Aug 31, 2010 12:08 PM CDT reply actions  

In a word....nope.

In more words. The preseason isn’t for starters. Your starters can get into rhythm with a total the amounts to a single game worth of real time rockin’ and rollin’. Your rookies need more snaps to become accustomed, so too do your practice squad players and the lesser talent you’re evaluating. The coaches barely get enough game tape on these guys to make educated decisions on skimming down to a 53 man roster.

If you increase to 18 games etc, you would also have to increase the active rosters and the total rosters. That means even more camp bodies and more decisions to make all with less time on the table. It can’t be done in a fashion that would ever ensure you made the correct decisions on building your team.

You want more of an argument. Pierre Thomas, Mike Bell, Lynell Hamilton, Lance Moore, Hartley, Darnell Dinkins, Jabari Greer, Remi Ayodele. Every single one of these guys came into the NFL as an undrafted free agent. How many do you actual think would be around today if we changed to a 2 preseason game format? Here’s a hint….probably none. Without game time evaluation, these guys would never have beaten out fellow drafted rookies and veterans that teams already invested money in. It’s a business remember. And these guys that helped us win the Super Bowl, wouldn’t have stood a chance.

by jeff.l.b on Aug 31, 2010 12:23 PM CDT up reply actions  

(I know this isn’t a thread about 4+ 16 vs 2+ 18, but…)

re: 2 preseason games…

a) They’d play the #1’s less.

b) The rest of the guys will get more time

c) Player scouting will be more important the ever

d) They would probably have more itra-team practices and scrimmages to get the #1’s more time, and more time to evaluate the other guys.

-

I’m not putting my vote on an 18 game season, but I’m saying there are options and adjustments that can be made to compensate for the limited ‘official’ pre-season games.

Want to go to the Saints vs. Cowboys game? I've got an extra ticket.

by Dan Kelly on Aug 31, 2010 1:08 PM CDT up reply actions  

Actually i think they’d play the number 1’s more. They’d have to. They have to get them ready at game speed. You don’t really get that with intra-team practices because they’re all scenario scripted. You need the real game tempo.

by jeff.l.b on Aug 31, 2010 1:34 PM CDT up reply actions  

Ridiculous

This isn’t pop warner football. These players have been playing their whole lives. They train year round. They are ready for ‘game speed’. During the season they hardly do any contact drills at all in practice, yet somehow find a way to be ‘ready’ to go on Sunday. Furthermore, pre-season games are not real game tempo. Do you go to pre-season games? You can tell immediately its not a ‘real’ game.

In Breesus' name we play

by Breesus Christ Superstar on Aug 31, 2010 4:18 PM CDT up reply actions  

um..yea. I think you need to pay a little more attention. And as every single player in the history of the league has ever stated following their first few preseason games, the only thing they ever talk about is how they need to get used to the real game speed again vs practice.

by jeff.l.b on Aug 31, 2010 4:22 PM CDT up reply actions  

preseason is a scrimmage

to which the fans are invited. It doesn’t take these guys 4 games to get adjusted. That’s why some stars like Tomlinson never play in preseason. He didn’t need to and he was too valuable to risk an injury.
The other thing they ‘always say’ is the most important part of the preseason game for them was not getting injured. Everything else was gravy.

In Breesus' name we play

by Breesus Christ Superstar on Aug 31, 2010 4:30 PM CDT up reply actions  

Au contraire

The Saints’ 1st team offense still isn’t hitting on all cylinders. And I don’t know where you get the idea that preseason games aren’t full speed: dogging it in a game, preseason or not, is the fastest way to get your ass cut.

It was worth the wait.

by MtnExile on Aug 31, 2010 5:32 PM CDT up reply actions  

well, I guess we're doomed

because Drew Brees won’t see the field for our last preseason game (thankfully)

In Breesus' name we play

by Breesus Christ Superstar on Sep 1, 2010 11:02 AM CDT up reply actions  

There are exceptions here and there, but generally speaking....

the teams discounting the significance of pre-season games are the teams losing pre-season games.

Breesus: “Kenny Stabler may have needed 4 pre-season games to sober up”….. great line.

by Drew-Dat on Aug 31, 2010 7:50 PM CDT up reply actions  

Did you happen to see the showing our #1’s showed against the Patriots in the first preseason game?

"Here's the funny thing. Last night, I couldn't sleep too well. I called my dad (Bill) at 2:15 in the morning, and told him I had a feeling I was going to hit the game-winner from 42 yards on the right hash. I think I was two yards off."- Garrett Hartley

by Northfan on Aug 31, 2010 5:42 PM CDT up reply actions  

yes

I guarantee it would have been different if the game had counted.

In Breesus' name we play

by Breesus Christ Superstar on Sep 1, 2010 11:03 AM CDT up reply actions  

I disagree

Just like everything else, the coaches and players would adapt to the new system. The world would still turn. Just like you stated, there would probably be increased rosters. Practices and training camps would probably be run differently. Probably a lot more scrimmages between teams etc. It’s not like the NFL is going to drop 2 preseason games and keep everything else the same. The game will evolve and I think it will be for the better. And if it didn’t, I’d much prefer overlooking a Dinkins or Ayodele than lose a star player to injury in a meaningless game.

In Breesus' name we play

by Breesus Christ Superstar on Aug 31, 2010 4:13 PM CDT up reply actions  

When’s the last time we ever lost a “star” in a preseason game? What’s next? You get rid of practices too because drew brees pulls a hammy during a wind sprint?

by jeff.l.b on Aug 31, 2010 4:25 PM CDT up reply actions  

Vilma for one

Do I really need to list all the stars/starters over the years that teams have had injured in preseason?

In Breesus' name we play

by Breesus Christ Superstar on Aug 31, 2010 4:33 PM CDT up reply actions  

Isn't one enough?

Can you imagine if we lost Drew Brees like Atlanta lost Vick several years back?

In Breesus' name we play

by Breesus Christ Superstar on Aug 31, 2010 4:34 PM CDT up reply actions  

yea you’re right, let’s put him in a glass case and not let anyone touch him. Sorry, I’m a football fan. Feel free to go watch ice dancing.

by jeff.l.b on Aug 31, 2010 4:51 PM CDT up reply actions  

ha

I understand injuries are a part of the game. I’m cool with that. I just don’t like to see them happen in a meaningless preseason game to a franchise player just so the owners can charge real game prices to season ticket holders while a couple of scrubs fight over the last practice squad spot.
Obviously, the owners have fooled you into believing the preseason has a crucial purpose that is worth injuries to starters and top dollar tickets. Enjoy!

In Breesus' name we play

by Breesus Christ Superstar on Aug 31, 2010 5:02 PM CDT up reply actions  

Wow do you have it backward. It’s the owners trying to convince people like you that preseason is useless and you need to get rid of it for two more games that cause more injury and less competitive football down the stretch. Enjoy that garbage all you want.

by jeff.l.b on Aug 31, 2010 5:38 PM CDT up reply actions  

Its not me, its you

Then why is the NFL the ONLY football league at any level that has preseason games?
Somehow college players and coaches find a way to be ready for the regular season without preseason games, and, unlike the pros, the college season is practically a single elimination tournament. Somehow highschool players and coaches can be ready; pop warner can be ready. However for some reason the best football players in the world absolutely, positively cannot play a game they have played at the highest level their entire lives without 4 (not 3, 2 or 1) preseason games.
In my post I wasn’t even talking about an 18 game season (although I do support it). I was commenting that many experts think the injury rate is higher in the preseason than in the regular season. And If this is indeed true, does it change anyones mind about 4 preseason games.
Finally from the owners standpoint, the preseason as it exists today, is nothing more than a compromise with the players association to create a way to charge fans for 4 more regular priced tickets. That’s all.

In Breesus' name we play

by Breesus Christ Superstar on Sep 1, 2010 10:56 AM CDT up reply actions  

Colleges don’t have to cull their rosters down to a restrictive total by a certain date. If a player isn’t good enough to contribute, there’s still a chance he’s on the roster. No one is pressed to make yea-or-nay evaluations (that’s handled during the recruiting process) and no walk-on’s livelihood depends on their doing so. High school football has jamborees. They’re the equivalent of an exhibition game.

"I was not on the boat in question" -Darren Sharper

by coldpizza on Sep 1, 2010 2:13 PM CDT up reply actions  

We were talking about getting ready for 'game speed'

The lack of roster culling shouldn’t make a player any more ready for ‘game speed’ according to those in favor of preseason games. They have nothing to do with playing time. If you are arguing that the NFL should increase its roster size to groom more players, that’s fine with me. Colleges are limited in the number of scholarships they offer which kind of acts like a roster limit, but is equally unrelated to being ready to play.
Not familiar with jamborees. I’ll take your word for it. Doubt they have 4 exhibition jamborees before the start of the season.

In Breesus' name we play

by Breesus Christ Superstar on Sep 1, 2010 2:19 PM CDT up reply actions  

Also, the CFL has a two week exhibition season beginning in mid June.

"I was not on the boat in question" -Darren Sharper

by coldpizza on Sep 1, 2010 2:15 PM CDT up reply actions  

I could live with 2 exhibition games

I just think 4 is excessive and costly to fans and starters

In Breesus' name we play

by Breesus Christ Superstar on Sep 1, 2010 2:20 PM CDT up reply actions  

“Finally from the owners standpoint, the preseason as it exists today, is nothing more than a compromise with the players association to create a way to charge fans for 4 more regular priced tickets. "

Even if the ticket prices of the two home preseason games were decreased by 50%, owners would merely jack up the eight regular season games by 12.5% to recoup the lost revenue. The season ticket holder would still be forced to pay the same total. The only people that would benefit are the single game purchasers that happen to be interested in exhibition games and let’s face it, judging from the sheer number of no-shows, there aren’t a whole lot of those. Including preseason in the package guarantees owners money they would not otherwise make. Eliminate preseason all together and it would just be refigured to 8 games. The players union will never agree to less, nor will management. Why would they?

"I was not on the boat in question" -Darren Sharper

by coldpizza on Sep 1, 2010 2:22 PM CDT up reply actions  

“The only people that would benefit are the single game purchasers that happen to be interested in exhibition games and let’s face it, judging from the sheer number of no-shows, there aren’t a whole lot of those.”

Conversely, the likely offset would make regular season games nearly unaffordable to those same single game purchasers (in the select markets even afforded such an opportunity).

"I was not on the boat in question" -Darren Sharper

by coldpizza on Sep 1, 2010 2:33 PM CDT up reply actions  

i'm having trouble following you

I don’t know how ticket prices would change, it depends if they add 2 more regular season games, but in general it should follow supply/demand economics. You’re right in the sense that the league is going to get it’s money. Fans might as well be paying for the real thing.

In Breesus' name we play

by Breesus Christ Superstar on Sep 1, 2010 3:09 PM CDT up reply actions  

It will follow supply and demand. Supply and demand for a 10 game season ticket package. You’re either in or you’re out. If you’re out, someone else will be in. Any fan that’s in will be paying for 10 sixty minute contests, no matter what you want to label them, no matter how you want to divy up the face values. As a fan that already pays for the full package (and would CONTINUE to pay for the full package), I’d rather that package contain two opportunities to see players vying to make the roster, not just one. a.) because I enjoy that completely different aspect of football. b.) because when I attend my one away regular season game per year, I don’t want to be forced to pay jacked up ticket prices, compensating for the reduced exhibition games that I will seldom (if ever) attend in that particular city. As long as all games carry the same face value, the season ticket holders of those teams will pick up that weight, just as I do in New Orleans, not me … the visiting fan.

"I was not on the boat in question" -Darren Sharper

by coldpizza on Sep 2, 2010 7:19 AM CDT up reply actions  

ok

the price will continue to go up as long as demand increases regardless of the number of preseason games.
Sounds like you are a fan that enjoys 2 preseason games, I can respect that.
One of my original points, though, is that preseason games have more to do with money than talent evaluation and 4 games has been the best financial compromise for players and owners. That compromise is being reevaluated.

In Breesus' name we play

by Breesus Christ Superstar on Sep 2, 2010 8:03 AM CDT up reply actions  

Oh, there’s no doubt in my mind that it has more to do with money. I also don’t have a problem with that. I fully understand the concept of getting what I pay for, as well as my prerogative to opt out, if or when I feel I’m no longer getting my money’s worth, as far as entertainment value goes. That’s never been the case, though. Even through the Ditka regime. As long as I continue to live in New Orleans (or any other NFL city) I will continue to attend games. If there’s a waiting list, I’ll figure out a way to buy an individual ticket to every game, until my turn comes up. Anyone can go to those extents to be “in that number”, most just choose not to.

"I was not on the boat in question" -Darren Sharper

by coldpizza on Sep 2, 2010 10:54 AM CDT up reply actions  

And I've got another shocking revelation:

Santa Claus is not real either.

As far as games down the stretch go (if we had been talking about 18 game seasons), I’ve gone on record as stating that its only 2 more games. 2 games wont water down the season a la baseball/basketball. In fact, it might even add more meaning by not having to depend on ridiculous NFL tie breaker scenarios that occur every year to decide wildcards and conference seeding. The tie-breaker scenarios are absurd and a tiny bit more separation at season’s end might be a good thing.

In Breesus' name we play

by Breesus Christ Superstar on Sep 1, 2010 4:46 PM CDT up reply actions  

Scaling back to a 15 game round robin season with no interconference play and unlimited overtimes would completely eliminate two-team tiebreakers. Every such W-L tie would have a head-to-head result to decide it. Further, it’s only one less game. A differential of one is even less than a differential of two. :)

"I was not on the boat in question" -Darren Sharper

by coldpizza on Sep 2, 2010 7:24 AM CDT up reply actions  

I dont know what to say to that C-P

It’s creative.
But we all know it will never happen ;)

In Breesus' name we play

by Breesus Christ Superstar on Sep 2, 2010 7:55 AM CDT up reply actions  

How would the bodies of those star players know that the first two games of the season were no longer exhibition games? Seems like if you’re going to get hurt, you’re going to get hurt. Who cares if the games count or not? Tom Brady got his knee blown out minutes into the first regular season game. How much did his mind-blowing 7 completions contribute to the success of the 2008 Patriots exactly?

"I was not on the boat in question" -Darren Sharper

by coldpizza on Sep 1, 2010 10:41 AM CDT up reply actions  

Couldn’t you look at it the other way, as well? Let’s say the NFL average is one significant player injury per game, regardless of whether that game is exhibition or regular season. If the Week 3 and 4 preseason games are now Weeks 1 and 2 of the regular season, that means the two players that get hurt will inevitably be players worthy of being on an NFL roster. At least with the extra exhibition games, there’s a chance you’re talking about players who would have been getting a visit from the Turk a few days later anyway.

"I was not on the boat in question" -Darren Sharper

by coldpizza on Sep 1, 2010 10:50 AM CDT up reply actions  

I follow you

Players get hurt. I would rather see it in a meaningful game. Against other starters. And my initial comment was discussing that several experts believe the injury rate is higher in preseason games to begin with.

In Breesus' name we play

by Breesus Christ Superstar on Sep 1, 2010 10:59 AM CDT up reply actions  

Citation needed

I’d have to see statistical proof of that.

"I was not on the boat in question" -Darren Sharper

by coldpizza on Sep 1, 2010 2:28 PM CDT up reply actions  

That was my original HYPOTHESIS

an educated guess that needs to be explored. That was the discussion I was trying to generate befroe you started calling non-season ticket holders fairweather fans.

In Breesus' name we play

by Breesus Christ Superstar on Sep 3, 2010 3:07 PM CDT up reply actions  

If we’re talking about a meaningful game late in the season, I agree … but only because that player would have theoretically made a season-behooving contribution up to that point. If it’s within the first two games of the season, that’s likely not going to be the case. I actually rather it happen in a preseason game, than in the first two games of the season. At least that way, you still have the next best player(s) competing for the position — ones who are already familiar with your playbook — readily available to step in and possibly pick up that slack. Once you’ve narrowed your roster down to 53, there’s no guarantee you’re going to be afforded those players you let go. Of course, the position at which the injury occurs also plays a factor. If it’s Brees in Week 2, bringing Canfield back isn’t going to save the season. If it’s Heath Evans, or someone else at a very thin position, then that familiarity could prove to be the difference between struggling and not missing a beat.

"I was not on the boat in question" -Darren Sharper

by coldpizza on Sep 1, 2010 2:47 PM CDT up reply actions  

your concern seems to be rooted in the 53 man roster

the best solution to your scenario would be to expand the roster, not play more preseason games

In Breesus' name we play

by Breesus Christ Superstar on Sep 1, 2010 3:04 PM CDT up reply actions  

What part of “I enjoy the preseason games” do you not understand? You’re right, they’re not the same as regular season games. Neither are playoff games. Playoff games can’t end deadlocked after 15 minutes of regulation. One team’s season is over after every playoff game. Whether “better” or “worse”, no one is looking to do away with two regular season games (or rounds of playoff games) based on these differences. There’s no steadfast rule saying the two have to be identical. If a season ticket holder isn’t interested in exhibition games, they can sell those tickets on TicketExchange to others who are. Also, the difference we’re talking about is only one home game, not two. I honestly don’t view it as a problem. 4+18 is fine by me. Put it this way, it’s no worse than 4+16. Outside of the fact that that’s two more non-playoff games that players can possibly get injured in, I mean. 2+18 would be worse, imo. Not only from a personal financial standpoint, but also from an entertainment one. If you’re a season ticket holder who actually puts his money where his mouth is, I respect your opinion. Far too many people who don’t are chiming in on this though and I think that’s part of the problem. Those are the ones who should have no say in the matter whatsoever.

"I was not on the boat in question" -Darren Sharper

by coldpizza on Sep 2, 2010 7:42 AM CDT up reply actions  

good for you

No doubt some fans enjoy the preseason. But you said yourself ‘judging from the empty seats, most fans do not’. Yes, season ticket holders can sell thier preseason tickets to the few who are interested, but at what price? Much, much less than the face value the season ticket holder was forced to pay. So, if the less interested fans are going to have to pay the same, you can understand why they would like to see more real games and less preseason games.
I don’t particularly enjoy the preseason, because it is a ruse. I could live with 2 games to shake the rust off, but 4 is completely unnecessary. Add to it the inevitable injuries that happen and it just pisses me off.
Equating preseason games to playoff games because they are both ‘different’ is ludicrous. Nothing more to say there.
Finally, if you think because you are a season ticket holder you are the sole proprietor of meaningful opinion on the business matters of the NFL you are in for a rude awakening. The owners are going to tell you how its going to be, and there are 50,000 people on the Saints season ticket waiting list salivating to take your place. Not to mention the millions of viewers who don’t enjoy the preseason as much as you do. You may want to listen to those who ‘should have no say in the matter whatsoever’ and think about making some concessions, or you might soon find yourself enjoying the preseason on the couch in front of your TV.

In Breesus' name we play

by Breesus Christ Superstar on Sep 2, 2010 8:39 AM CDT up reply actions  

“So, if the less interested fans are going to have to pay the same, you can understand why they would like to see more real games and less preseason games.”

This again comes back to supply and demand, as you pointed out. BECAUSE they are less interested fans, they don’t currently have season tickets. If they did, those games would be included. Regardless of the circumstances, the fact remains they’re on the outside looking in. Since no season ticket holder in their right mind is going to nonchalantly write off a regular season ticket at face value, those casual fans must take what they can get and quite often, the only thing available in terms of affordability are those less popular exhibition contests. If you went to either of the last two games, you’d know that half the Dome was empty. Those seats are paid for. The only thing Benson is missing out on is parking and concessions and that’s likely the ONLY concern he has on the matter. What’s affordable, what the fans want, what lessens the odds of injuries to starters, etc., you’re living a warm and fuzzy pipe dream, if you honestly think owners give two good sh*** about all that. It’s guaranteed money vs MORE guaranteed money.

“and there are 50,000 people on the Saints season ticket waiting list salivating to take your place”

Where were their fairweather saliva glands back in 2005, when season tickets were readily available? Lapping up flood water? Here’s a concerto featuring the world’s smallest violin, just for the folks on the waiting list.

“or you might soon find yourself enjoying the preseason on the couch in front of your TV.”

If it ever gets to that point, I’ll at least have enough common sense to know that I have no room to bitch about something I’m not paying to watch.

"I was not on the boat in question" -Darren Sharper

by coldpizza on Sep 2, 2010 10:31 AM CDT up reply actions  

Let me define 'less interested' more clearly

I was using that term to deliniate CURRENT SEASON TICKET HOLDERS WHO ARE NOT SHOWING UP FOR PRESEASON GAMES because they are less interested in them than season ticket holders like you. So what do you think the majority of season ticket holders who aren’t interested in the preseason, yet have to buy the preseason tickets in order to remain season ticket holders are going to choose when offered when the idea of 2 more regular season games with two less preseason games??? Preseason tickets are nothing more than a thinly veiled seat license to most season ticket holders (besides the few like you who seem to enjoy them. Exchanging 2 pre for 2 regular gives the ‘less interested’ season ticket holder more bang for their buck. Add to it that owners will make more money with concessions, parking and TV contracts and it doesn’t take a rocket scientist to figure out what is going to happen with this issue. ‘MORE guaranteed money’ duh.
To categorize fans (like myself) who are on the season ticket waiting list as less interested or ‘fairweather’ is asinine. In 2005 I was halfway across the country in graduate school. I couldn’t have afforded seasons tickets if I lived across the street. Didn’t make me any less of a fan. Now that I have a career and live close enough to go to games, I am on the list. I can certainly ‘put my money where my mouth is, and do by purchasing tickets off of stubhub etc. I pay more for the games I’m able to go to than you pay for your entire seasons worth of tickets. And yes, I believe quite a few people were treading water from katrina when season tickets were last available. Furthermore (back to the original theme) you don’t have to pay for a ticket in order to air your grievance against players on your favorite team being injured in meaningless games whose only purpose serves to line the owners pockets.
Finally, based on your commentary around here, I doubt there is any situation you could find yourself in which you’d find no room to bitch. It’s what you do.

In Breesus' name we play

by Breesus Christ Superstar on Sep 3, 2010 3:04 PM CDT up reply actions  

“Yes, season ticket holders can sell thier preseason tickets to the few who are interested, but at what price? Much, much less than the face value the season ticket holder was forced to pay.”

I guarantee you, if it’s 2+18, season ticket prices will not drop. If anything, they will go up. Divide it up however you want, you’d still be taking a loss on the preseason game(s) you elect not to attend. Even if the face value of that ticket is one dollar, you MIGHT get that dollar back. You will not make a profit. Meanwhile, you would have paid considerably more than prior face value for all nine regular season games. Who comes out ahead here exactly? The guy paying a buck to see a preseason game? I don’t care about that guy!

"I was not on the boat in question" -Darren Sharper

by coldpizza on Sep 2, 2010 10:41 AM CDT up reply actions  

I actually think that was practice… and yes, it was the year he was on the cover of…. nevermind.

Want to go to the Saints vs. Cowboys game? I've got an extra ticket.

by Dan Kelly on Aug 31, 2010 4:59 PM CDT up reply actions  

sorry dan

During a preseason game against the Baltimore Ravens on August 16, Vick suffered a fractured right fibula and missed the first 11 games of the regular season.

In Breesus' name we play

by Breesus Christ Superstar on Aug 31, 2010 5:08 PM CDT up reply actions  

gotcha...

but it was the year I was thinking of.

Want to go to the Saints vs. Cowboys game? I've got an extra ticket.

by Dan Kelly on Aug 31, 2010 5:16 PM CDT up reply actions  

That’s why Chase Ramsey has a paycheck.

by FriarBob on Aug 31, 2010 5:40 PM CDT up reply actions  

Guy pulled a groin and is going to miss a game. That’s not a real injury, give me a break. We have had literally dozens if not hundreds of worse injuries just piddling around in training camp without pads. Get over yourself.

by jeff.l.b on Aug 31, 2010 4:48 PM CDT up reply actions  

If we're lucky

I hope you are right. If you are wrong, well, we’re F*****

In Breesus' name we play

by Breesus Christ Superstar on Aug 31, 2010 5:11 PM CDT up reply actions  

As much as I want to beat Minn

I hope Vilma is benched if the injury is not totally healed. I want him to be completely fine with nothing lingering all year. But hopefully he will be healthy by then anyway and we don’t have to worry.

Ingram put on PUP and I think Sharper will be alright to play some by opening day, or they will at least try him. I really don’t see how they cut him; he just might not be playing full time week 1. Jenkins seems like he will develop into a good safety in the future, but I don’t think he’s quite there yet in his coverage skills. We could really use Sharper out there and let Jenkins develope a little more. Maybe they could split some time. Go D Sharp!!

And Graham may come in toward the second half of the year in red zone. I don’t think he will be a good enough everydown player to take snaps from Shockey or Thomas.

Two Dat!! Who Dat!?

by ReggieVilma on Aug 31, 2010 12:17 PM CDT reply actions  

Does Vilma have a ‘consecutive starts’ streak going?

Just curious.

Want to go to the Saints vs. Cowboys game? I've got an extra ticket.

by Dan Kelly on Aug 31, 2010 1:09 PM CDT up reply actions  

Not really. He missed games in 2007 because of the knee injury. But never missed a start before, or after.

by jeff.l.b on Aug 31, 2010 1:36 PM CDT up reply actions  

For what it's worth,

The good news is The Vikings would gladly trade their injury concerns for our injury concerns.

by Drew-Dat on Aug 31, 2010 4:50 PM CDT up reply actions  

Sharper will be on the roster

I love Usama Young and Jenkins but there is no way they could lead a competitive defense – they would get torn up. Young will be a career backup/special teams guy and Jenkins isn’t ready yet. I think they are just being cautious with Sharper- he does his own thing anyway and will continue and this way they get more time to work with Jenkins. No DSharp means serious depth issues at Safety.

Graham will be practice squad- hopefully no one lures him away but although teams probably would be interested in him, I would doubt any teams would actually give him playing time especially since I don’t think he’s quite ready and I dopn’t think he does special teams. They will probably tell him many things (all true) to keep him here (such as Shockey never plays 16 games, Evans is coming off a missed season and moving D Thomas to Fb will put Graham on active roster, Graham will develop much better/faster under Brees/Payton/ Shockey/Thomas tutelage, and also that whoever our 3rd (or 4th) TE is may not be at the end of the season opening up a position for Graham).

Also, in regards to Ingram, I think they will surprisingly try to keep him- maybe PUP , as every coach wants experience at LB. I don’t think they are thrilled with Dunbar except as a long term project. Casillas looks good, but not spectacular so the depth at LB is questionable too.

"I think we agree, the past is over" - George W Bush
"The greatest enemy of knowlege is not ignorance; it is the illusion of knowledge" Stephen Hawking

by Philinwood on Aug 31, 2010 1:52 PM CDT reply actions  

If he’s on the practice squad, he’s gone as they’ll be 31 teams signing him in a heartbeat.

by jeff.l.b on Aug 31, 2010 2:06 PM CDT up reply actions  

An anonymous GM told Peter King at the time that Graham had been the steal of the draft

You are my people, you are my crowd, this is our music, we love it loud...

by bondcrash on Aug 31, 2010 2:52 PM CDT up reply actions  

If they try to sneak Graham onto the practice squad

…I hope whoever claims him at least gives PayLoo a reach-around.

It was worth the wait.

by MtnExile on Aug 31, 2010 5:36 PM CDT up reply actions  

In other Saints injury news

from Rotoworld.com

Jeff Duncan @ Times-Picayune reports:

August 31, 2010 – HansDat’s back has been acting up lately.

Here’s hoping he stretches and walks often to keep it loose and ready for the massive amounts of sitting, eating, drinking, pacing around the room and standing up and hollering at the TV on September 9. I’d check into the injury report on the day of the game so a possible last-minute scratch doesn’t ruin your opening week fantasy roster. You may want to be ready to start Stujo4 in his place.

It's gonna be a great year.

by HansDat on Aug 31, 2010 3:49 PM CDT reply actions   1 recs

I doubt he makes the final roster.

Football is easy if you're crazy as hell

by Grumps on Aug 31, 2010 3:57 PM CDT up reply actions  

Cut them all except Dave

Dave is like our Drew Brees of our nice blog. He can throw to a bunch of no name receivers and still get 5k yards :D

Superbowl bound!!!...I know! do you?! Go Saints!!

by skinnykinney on Aug 31, 2010 4:01 PM CDT up reply actions  

Naw man...

He’s got so much potential… we can’t cut him. I really want to see what he can do in a real game. Why don’t the coaches give this kid more time in the pre-season?? GAAAA!!!

And, I really loved this kid in college. He lit up the WAC like nobody’s business!

Want to go to the Saints vs. Cowboys game? I've got an extra ticket.

by Dan Kelly on Aug 31, 2010 4:08 PM CDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

The ultimate community for lovers of all things Black and Gold! The latest news, commentary, discussion, linkage and more! Join in the conversation now with all of your fellow Who Dats!

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

1311373128_guildwars2commando_697440_small
CSC Lagniappe: #13 Alltime Saints

Recent FanPosts

Small
Saints showing disrespect towards Drew Brees
Images_small
Hosting the Super Bowl
Small
Understanding our broken psyche (or "Why does it still hurt?")
Small
12 men on the field strategy?
Evil_bunny_small
Statistical Breakdown of WR Usage
271015_10150225174105754_682505753_7748609_5242564_n_1__small
My thoughts on the offseason
Angry_birds_small
About Robert Meachem
Tate_small
Expendable?
1311373128_guildwars2commando_697440_small
More draft options 2nd round or later...

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Featured Poll

Poll
Which Saints regular season was better: 2009 or 2011?
2009
402 votes
2011
446 votes

848 votes | Poll has closed

We're on Twitter!

Click here to start following Da Chronic! Tweet, tweet!

Twitter-logo_medium


Head Coach

Erindavewhodat_small Dave Cariello

Assistant Coach (Editor/Contributor)

0113wbphillips_small HansDat

Saintslogo_small Andrew Juge

Offensive Coordinators (Contributors)

13088_f520_small David "Satch" Kelly

L_f46d02fdda5fad668929c4424cb0d2dc_small Preston J. Gary, Jr.