Stats Don't Support Saints Late-Game Decisions Against Falcons
Holy hell this game has left a seriously bad taste in my mouth. I had mentally prepared myself beforehand for the possibility of the Saints losing this crucial division game to a worthy opponent, but what I didn't think to expect was the frustrating manner in which they would lose it.
Don't get me wrong, there were a lot of mistakes made by the Saints throughout the game putting them in a precarious overtime spot. But instead of blaming Garrett Hartley's missed field goal attempt, we could just as easily question Sean Payton's curious late-game decisions. Yes, Hartley should have made the game-winning field goal. Yes, Sean Payton should be able to trust him to make that chip shot. But I have no clue why Hartley was so quickly placed in that situation to begin with. The missed field goal attempt might needn't have been necessary.
The Saints offense was marching down the field with plenty of time on the clock and had just gotten another first down on Atlanta's 11 yard line. So why not run two more plays and give your offense a chance to win the game themselves? I certainly wouldn't want them to try a passing play and risk the chance of interception but I see no reason not to try two running plays. Then if your team doesn't get in the endzone, you can still kick on third down, leaving yourself an extra down in case of botched snap.
Is there a high risk of fumble that enters the equation when determining when to kick a FG in overtime? I don't think so. Over the past two seasons the Saints have coughed up the ball 17 times on 533 carries, meaning we can expect a 3.2% chance that they'll fumble on any given running play. Meanwhile, Garrett Hartley has missed 4/17 field goal attempts over the past two years at the time of the kick and has shown inconsistency thus far this season. So instead of taking two low-risk opportunities to run for a TD and avoiding any chance of a missed kick, the Saints just passed "Go" and went straight to rolling the dice.
Sure, Pierre Thomas, Chris Ivory and even Brees might have been banged up at the end of the game but are two more plays that much to ask for? If the Saints needed fresh legs or were concerned about further injury, LaDell Betts could have been an option.
On another note, Payton decided to call a last second timeout right before Matt Bryant's game-winning field goal try in an effort to "ice" the kicker. I hate that term, I really hate that it's such a trendy thing to do and I really, really hate that the Payton tried it himself today. Of course the Saints were able to block that attempt but the results of that play were voided after the timeout. Bryant then used his second chance to give his team the win...from five yards deeper. Sure, it works sometimes but stats show it doesn't work as often as it does. Had Payton not called that timeout, the Saints might have still blocked the kick, gotten the ball back and had another chance to win. Either way, "icing" doesn't really offer an advantage.
Just four days ago the Wall Street Journal statistically examined the very question at the heart of this issue: Does "icing" the kicker really work? The short answer is that no, it does not. On field goals between 36 and 50 yards (Bryant's would have been 41 yards) since 2000, kickers have made 73.9% when no timeout is called and 75.5% when there is a timeout. That's right, they make it more often when they have more time to think, concentrate, visualize and correct any problems they may make on a first, 'practice' attempt. Go figure.
Here is the full chart...
| WITHOUT CALLING A TIMEOUT BEFORE | |||
| Distance (yards) | Made | Att. | % |
| 35 and shorter | 193 | 216 | 89.4% |
| 36-50 | 161 | 218 | 73.9% |
| 51 and longer | 23 | 54 | 42.6% |
| Totals | 377 | 488 | 77.3% |
| WITH CALLING A TIMEOUT BEFORE | |||
| 35 and shorter | 69 | 74 | 93.2% |
| 36-50 | 74 | 98 | 75.5% |
| 51 and longer | 14 | 25 | 56% |
| Totals | 157 | 197 | 79.7% |
84 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
This game was "lost" before OT
However OT played out, the Saints were just outplayed for most of the game. I agree with you, Dave, that Payton should never have tried the kick on a 1st down, but that’s not why they lost.
HB no it isn't why they lost.
Saints lost because Sean Payton had no faith in his offense to finish one of their best drives of the game. Again. Sean Paton lost his man sack when it mattered the most, in this one game.
by saints-fan-in-miss on Sep 26, 2010 7:42 PM CDT up reply actions
I don't disagree about the bad coaching in OT
I’m just saying there was 60 minutes of sub par play from the offensive line and some other players long before that. If they take care of business during regulation, that bad choice to kick the FG on 1st down never comes up.
+1
Why are the Saints putting themselves in these tight game situations? You keep playing with fire eventually you get burned.
"I want the gas pedal down." Sean Payton
I'm a Saints fan--Hubby's a Bears fan.
by SaintsChick on Sep 26, 2010 10:54 PM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
I don't think they are having close games on purpose
It's gonna be a great year.
by Hans Petersen on Sep 27, 2010 7:14 PM CDT up reply actions
From my couch it looked like the whistle was blown
causing the lineman to ease up, allowing the blocked kick. Had there not been a whistle, probably not a block either.
In Breesus' name we play
by Breesus Christ Superstar on Sep 26, 2010 7:21 PM CDT reply actions
agree 100%
It's gonna be a great year.
by Hans Petersen on Sep 27, 2010 7:14 PM CDT up reply actions
think your right
Superbowl bound!!!...I know! do you?! Go Saints!!
by skinnykinney on Sep 28, 2010 10:21 PM CDT up reply actions
and WTF is up with ivory only 3 carries coming on three crucial downs
especially after fumbling the first crucial fourth and one. Don’t put an injured undrafted FA in that spot! give it to someone who knows how to hold on to the ball and get a tough yard. Then they give it to him 2 consecutive times on the final drive with the game on the line. He’s carrying the ball away from his body, I thought he was going to fumble every carry.
In Breesus' name we play
by Breesus Christ Superstar on Sep 26, 2010 7:25 PM CDT reply actions
Completely agree with you on this. Ladell Betts has NFL experience and has averaged over 4 yards per carry throughout his career, only fumbling once ever 72 touches. From the way they were trying to make a 3rd down hero out of Ivory, you would think that Payton had no such option.
I also don’t understand why you would take direct snaps from center at the end of regulation with no timeouts. All it takes is for Goodwin to accidentally step on Drew’s foot and the game is over. From shotgun, he could have easily surveyed the end zone, then throw it over everyone’s head if no one is open. With the time wasted dropping back in the pocket + the 9 seconds left on the clock, they could have easily done this twice.
Four glaring needs IMO: a workhorse RB — I’d still want to platoon him to cut down on the wear and tear, but I want someone who can actually get the job done on the ground, not just on screens — a franchise LT, as many OLBs as we’re allowed to draft and another SS. Shanle and Harper are both hot garbage, who cannot cover a TW to save their lives, nor wrap up within 5 yards of the line of scrimmage, if at all.
"I was not on the boat in question" -Darren Sharper
Betts hadn't been in practice recently
That’s the only reason I can think Payton decided not to use him. I thought for sure Betts would get some time on the field in this game – even predicted 40+ yards for him in the prediction game.
Until now, I’ve never really felt strongly either way about that need for a franchise LT. The need is becoming more and more evident though. The need for OLBs has been glaring for a long time, and drafting them in the 4th round or later is probably not the answer. As for Harper, I think he’s serviceable for the foreseeable future (he’s definitely gotten a little better every year), and I’d rather see them get a truly elite WR.
You'd think Ivory would be in Payton's Dog House
after the 4th dn fumble, but to continue to use him? I was holding my breath. Atl. figured he’s in there to get the ball, they key in on him.
You think you know, and you don't know, and you never, ever will.-Jim Mora Sr.
and they kept running the exact same play with him
his ass needs to be on special teams coverage at best
In Breesus' name we play
by Breesus Christ Superstar on Sep 26, 2010 9:07 PM CDT up reply actions
Are we talking about the same Ivory that caused some folks to be upset with Yahoo Sports because they didn’t give him enough respect??
he didn’t earn any respect, now did he today?
"I want the gas pedal down." Sean Payton
I'm a Saints fan--Hubby's a Bears fan.
by SaintsChick on Sep 26, 2010 10:57 PM CDT up reply actions
Yeah. I saw the end of that game after Fox cut to it following my Vikes’ bumblin’ stumblin’ win over Detroit, and couldn’t believe what I say on that FG try on 1st & 10. I came here earlier & was surprised there wasn’t much discussion of it here, so I decided not to stir the hornet’s nest on my own. But now that you have … how does it feel to have a coaching staff execute as poorly as ours did at the end of the NFCCG? Maybe Peyton was remembering what happened to us, that we were in position to win, then screwed it up by trying ot eek out a few more yeards before kicking. Dunno.
The TO called before the kick was less curious, but I imagine hard to stomach after watching the train wreck at end of regulation. My sympathies
…. well, OK, maybe not :) I still have faith my Vikes will get it together, and I really don’t want to have our playoff road go through the Superdome again if they actually do :)
Yupp our Coaching staff execution was horrendous.
Glad Payton didn’t act like this during the NFCCG, otherwise you guys would have spent the offseason hating the colts.
Week 4 matchup: Panthers
Week 4 motto: Black pants, burned they must be.
If you had lost of course,
sorry not using my full brain today.
Week 4 matchup: Panthers
Week 4 motto: Black pants, burned they must be.
it was funny the way it came out the first time.
Hakim dropped the ball!
by CrazyforColston on Sep 26, 2010 7:42 PM CDT up reply actions
The Vikings game was no less lopsided statistically than this game. We just caught a few more breaks with the turnovers. It’s pretty much a given that you can’t hang your hat on takeaways the way they have. All this BS about LETTING the opponent march down the field, because they KNOW they’ll be able to take the ball away is laughable. Where was the drive-saving turnover on the Roddy White TD drive? Where was it on the game winning drive in OT? Oh, that’s right … they didn’t occur. Here’s a novel idea: how’s about improving our personnel and start playing better fundamental defense in order to get the ball back even sooner, instead of holding our collective breaths waiting for fate to intervene. Today’s not-so-fairy-tale ending was practically the flipside of last year’s Redskins win. Inexplicably pushed chip shot FG, followed by OT loss. The only difference being that this time, the team that played better throughout the game actually won it.
"I was not on the boat in question" -Darren Sharper
Can't say I disagree with anything you said.
I would SOO much rather a defense that stops rather than gets amazing takeaways. It doesn’t make for better ball games, but I will take 48-3 blowouts over 27-24 thrillers everyday, especially when the 27-24 does not go my way. The NFCCG had good decisions by Payton though, yes the turnovers that went our way were crucial, but Payton made good decisions that if we had a different coaching staff…simply would not have led to the victory. Heres to a solid LB corp within the next 2 years.
Week 4 matchup: Panthers
Week 4 motto: Black pants, burned they must be.
I agree.....
“how’s about improving our personnel and start playing better fundamental defense "
I love the saints but I am tired as hell of having a soft defense….
by blackandgoldbuddha on Sep 26, 2010 8:12 PM CDT up reply actions
Can't help who our personnel are at this point
Sadly, I think we’re getting the most out of the players we have on defense; they just aren’t that good.
Would have liked to see payton and brees make better decisions when the game was ours for the taking.
In Breesus' name we play
by Breesus Christ Superstar on Sep 26, 2010 8:49 PM CDT up reply actions
Yeah Payton really outcoached himself on that one.
I’m totally convinced we would have gotten a TD within the 3 tries with our offense the way we move the ball. On the other hand, no excuse to miss a 29 yd fieldgoal in a dome.
How's it feel to be 1-2
with your only win against the lions?
In Breesus' name we play
by Breesus Christ Superstar on Sep 26, 2010 8:49 PM CDT up reply actions
YUK
I’m still sick – I’ll let all the (bleeps) take turns being “head coach” and talking about what we did and didn’t do well. I’ll be throwing up.
BTW, Brees looked like Brett Favre on that underhanded INT – trying too hard to make something happen and made a piss poor choice. Oh well, even our “heroes” are entitled to be couyons sometimes.
I'm not calling you a wussy, just your beer. My homebrew, however, is more flavorful and closely related to what men with swords and bad tempers drank 500 years ago, that's all.
Dave I was tempted to put up my first blog,but.
You pretty well said it all with a lot more tac than I could.
by saints-fan-in-miss on Sep 26, 2010 7:47 PM CDT reply actions
Still remains to see how this offense takes slap in the mouth from Payton.
Cut it any way you want, but the offense did have it going on when they had to in the last minutes. After a hard fought game, that was with in their grasp, and Falcons on their heels finally. Only to have SP take them off the field with four downs to go 11 yards and hand it over to an unproven kicker. Say what !! ? I am not nearly as worried about losing one game as losing the offensive locker room. I saw a piece where Hartley missed a field goal and Payton met him coming off the field and said " grow some nuts" He did, made what 4 over 40 yds. to win SB. I say Sean needs to grow a pair. That decision was not one of a pitt bull but a lab. What happened to that attack mentality of 09? Onsides kick against the Colts!
by saints-fan-in-miss on Sep 26, 2010 7:58 PM CDT reply actions
Everybody is beating up on Payton,,,
But I’m sorry you kicker HAS to make a 29 Yard field goal…..end of story…..
by blackandgoldbuddha on Sep 26, 2010 7:59 PM CDT reply actions
I'm sorry, he has to make it on fourth down when the offense couldn't . NOT FIRST down on the 11 yrd line
by saints-fan-in-miss on Sep 26, 2010 8:04 PM CDT up reply actions
Hartley makes the kick then who would care.....
no one……this is how the NFL goes when it doesnt work your crucified and second guessed when it works your a genius….
What coach thinks his kicker cant make a 29 yd FG goal?? he did it last week…
by blackandgoldbuddha on Sep 26, 2010 8:09 PM CDT up reply actions
What coach thinks his Super Bowl Champion offense can't go 11 yards in four downs?
When they just converted ,what 3 , 4 first downs handily?
by saints-fan-in-miss on Sep 26, 2010 8:11 PM CDT up reply actions
great point!
"I can eat oreos faster than him" Scott Fujita's take on Payton Manning SB44
by jeremysherwin on Sep 26, 2010 8:13 PM CDT up reply actions
Its a doggone 29 yard field goal!!!!!
by blackandgoldbuddha on Sep 26, 2010 8:15 PM CDT up reply actions
well, he's 1 for 3 from that distance in the dome this year
so, maybe he should have had some doubts
In Breesus' name we play
by Breesus Christ Superstar on Sep 26, 2010 8:52 PM CDT up reply actions
The most frustrating thing about “punk” is that he makes the ones you don’’t think he can make and misses the ones that you figure he should make blindfolded.
ok here is the deal...
Anyone that knows about offensive football knows that things get tight in the red zone. When you move the ball down the field, its gets harder when you get into the red zone. Defenses tighten up on you. Especially one that is only worrying about keeping you from scoring (i.e. looking for the take-a-way) and if not knows they will be going home with a loss. Someone made a comment that Payton seemed to be like Childress in the NFCCG with a poor coaching decision not trying to go for a TD with 1st and goal from the 11. Grant you, I wonder if we could have gotten in the end zone to with two tries leaving the fourth down as a crutch in case of a bad snap and hold. But I have no doubt that if Payton would have made those attempts, and we had a fumble/turnover then everybody would have been posting that Payton is a dumb-as_ and should have kicked the field goal to take the win and not tried for the TD. We can all debate that till we are blue in the face but from Payton’s point, he trusted Hartley and trusted that the Falcon’s D (which came through many times in that game) would give their all not to allow that TD and certainly go for the strip or int if it were a pass. Besides the red zone especially the end zone gets a lot tighter than when you have the whole field to work with. If we saw a turnover on those attempts, Payton would have been compared to Childress in his play calling decision attempting a pass instead of running the ball to try to get a few more yards before attempting the kick to try to take the win in regulation in the NFCCG. I say Payton made the wise decision for the most part. Trust in SP because he gave us an SB. If things go miserably down hill from here on, then we can legitimately begin the question.
I don't agree with your FG odds
you can’t take the chance of success of a FG kick without looking at the distance. I wish I had the odds of making that kick, because I’m sure that it’s greater than the odds of losing the ball.
That icing the kicker call sucked sucked sucked. It’s like someone else said, you’re giving them a free look at your D.
yeah i hate the call to begin with
but we wouldn’t have blocked the kick the first time imo. the whistle blew and the O-line let up there. don’t know if that was what you were thinking about with the icing the kicker or not but thought i’d throw it out there
Superbowl bound!!!...I know! do you?! Go Saints!!
by skinnykinney on Sep 28, 2010 10:27 PM CDT up reply actions
Payton call could have been viewed as careless.
But it was not more careless than the onside kick that was recovered.
Is he reckless yes. Is he arrogant yes. Was it the wrong call yes.
What head coach in the league would not think that their FG kicker would miss a game winning field goal at home? Especially less than a 30 yarder.
Maybe brees should have taken a sack for about 10 yards. Maybe that would have made “Fat A$$” more comfortable.
My issue is GW not SP. I mean seriously, how are you going to cover a TE? Do you even have a plan? You sure as hell have not had a plan the last 3 weeks. Now every NFL team will be drooling watching game tape from the saints. All you effing have to do is throw the damn ball to the tight end, and you will beat the saints!
Seriously, does anyone see a problem with this.
I am sad to say, that it was not so much the players loosing this game, but rather our coaches lost.
Yes I said out, Sean Payton, and GW were out coached. Drew had the best night of this year regardless of his INTs. Lance Moore, well what more can you ask for from a reciever?
"I can eat oreos faster than him" Scott Fujita's take on Payton Manning SB44
We were definitely out coached for sure
What the hell was Payton thinking kicking a FG on first down. Why not run 3 plays with play action mix of run and pass and Go for the TD. There are 3 things that irk me here. Number 1. Yes Hartley is payed millions to make a chip shot clutch field goal. 2. Payton not having confidence for running 3 more downs before the FG. And 3. Our Defense is just horrendous! We can’t stop the run. We can’t defend third down. We’re giving up big plays!
Hopefully they will look at this loss as a wakeup call and realize you can’t keep riding these nail biters. It bit them today. And they should be pissed and focused for next week and kick butt!!
Brees played his heart out and put up good numbers. This is the week they need to have a gameplan and clean up these sloppy mistakes.
by Jricky70 on Sep 26, 2010 8:33 PM CDT reply actions 1 recs
Jricky70
Hi bro. I have wore my finger prints off I am so pissed. Now after a few more beers and tons of venting , more stunned. Ok. Maybe more drunk. Bottom line. Has Payton lost his nuts and confidence in the best Saints offense to ever touch a football? Convert 3 or 4 times like clock work get to the 11 yard line. And give it to at best an on /off kicker and not your offense? Bet that offensive locker room is beat down. How does Payton get them back? If it were me and I fought all day and had the win in my grasp and the coach pulls me with 4 downs and 11 yrds to go ? We will see.
by saints-fan-in-miss on Sep 26, 2010 8:44 PM CDT up reply actions
That's exactly my point
We have all those weapons and he elects to kick a field goal on first down. Sounded like a Jim Mora move. A sickening feeling. Yeah I’m sure the offense and Drew Brees is questioning that to him right now. And don’t even mention defense. What defense?
If I were the Saints and coaching staff. I would be mad as hell, focused and wanting to correct every mistake in the book so they can kick butt next Sunday! This should be a huge motivator. Let’s do it!
what about black pants?
ive been seeing alot of yall talking about the black pants. is there some kinda curse surrounding these pants?
New Orleans Saints: Established 2010
Some of us think they’re cursed. All most all of us think they’re ugly. In either event, we were wearing them in two of the three losses last year.
I saw the damn black pants
& I freaked out immediately. I think those damn thinks are jinxed.
"I want the gas pedal down." Sean Payton
I'm a Saints fan--Hubby's a Bears fan.
by SaintsChick on Sep 26, 2010 11:03 PM CDT up reply actions
payton's decision
Didn’t get to see the game, was at work so I listened to it on the radio. But Ivory had already turned it over once and had been relatively ineffective. It sounds as if Pierre was banged up a few plays earlier. So if Payton wasn’t willing to risk Brees throwing it, running may not have been a wise option. If Thomas or Brees or anyone had gotten injured at that point, or had Ivory coughed it up again, everyone would have said that Payton should have just kicked the FG. The reality is that Hartley efed it up again and it is looking more and more like the playoffs and Super Bowl last year were the anomolies, NOT his struggles this season. I will always appreciate what he did for us last season, but going back to the second Tampa game last season, he has proven to be very inconsistent.
by TX Saint on Sep 26, 2010 9:51 PM CDT reply actions 1 recs
Rec'd Tx Saint
Last season is history. What Hartley did was truly incredible! But this is 2010 and they have alot to clean up for the next. I see this loss as motivator to realize the Saints can be beat and we can’t rely on riding these nailbiters. And it bit us today. And have a feeling Payton and Co will get that “Attitude” and “Fire” back.
When they have that, they kick some Royal butt!
That's Nuts
Hartley has a career percentage of 86% so how can you say he is inconsistant. I mean I agree there is no excuse for missing a 29 yard fieldgoal but as the stats posted above show the league average is between 89% and 93% so it does happen. Another stat that I should point out is that was the first fieldgoal out of eleven attempts inside of the thirty yard line he has missed in his career.
Just wanted to reiterate what I said in the second half thread
You guys should be proud of your team. You played a hell of a game, and we’re going to be duking it out for the NFC the rest of the year. No shame in losing to a Falcons team that may be as good as I’ve ever seen.
It feels like the natural state of things, having our two teams playing well and fiercely competing. You guys are a great fanbase, and you’ll bounce back. I wish you luck until we meet again.
Take it easy, CSCers.
Sign up for a free account today to join the discussion about all things Atlanta Falcons!
Well Said Dave!
You guys played a hell of a game as well. Very dangerous team that can run like no other. It was a hard battle on both teams. Hopefully our defense will tighten up a bit. We shall meet again week 16.
I was worried about this game all week but....
poor coaching was’nt why. Dave you are dead on in your evaluation of the game. I hope that they learned something from this. We’re not done yet. Who Dat !
"When I read about the evils of drinking, I gave up reading" Henny Youngman
Mr. Dave, please clarify
Meanwhile, Garrett Hartley was 4/17 on all field goal attempts over the past two years at the time of the kick and has shown inconsistency thus far this season.
He is 13 for 18 in 2009 and 2010 to date, excluding postseason. He went 13 for 13 in 2008. I distinctly remember both misses in 2009: His plant foot slipped in the slop at Washington, and ….. he missed the Tampa Bay kick which earned him the Fat Punk Kicker tag.
Bringing in other kickers (Matt Stover? Child please) is not the solution. We all know the solution:
.
.
.
.
.
.

"Brees just channeled Tyler Palko on that pick." -Jeff Duncan via twitter
by stujo4 on Sep 26, 2010 10:40 PM CDT reply actions 2 recs
BOOM!
Yeah, Hartley is in some mental funk or something. Can we book him for the hour on one of Dr. Phil’s shows this week? Maybe the Crane boys are available.
"As soon as Tony (Dungy) said we had no chance, I knew we had 'em right where we wanted 'em"--Coach Sean Payton right after Super Bowl XLIV with the Lombardi Trophy firmly in hand. WHO DAT!!
by David "Satch" Kelly on Sep 26, 2010 11:12 PM CDT up reply actions
Typo
He had MISSED 4/17 kicks up to that point.
Wanna say something? Sign up! It's free!
by Dave Cariello on Sep 27, 2010 1:29 AM CDT up reply actions
maybe you need a photo-shopper to put Carney's head on Melfi's body
and that’s the Therapist he needs
It's gonna be a great year.
by Hans Petersen on Sep 27, 2010 7:20 PM CDT up reply actions
On the second int
I was really surprised at which receivers were NOT in the game. If I remember, I saw Shockey, Moore and Colston come out and I think Graham, Meachem and D Thomas were in. Not sure, but it was an important down and not the time for Graham to be in the game. Not when we have so many good receivers.
Also, Betts should have been on the roster from the pre-season and Ivory on practice squad. That would have given us the appropriate depth at RB. Poor planning. Ivory wasn’t ready for this game and Betts would have been very easily prepared with a minimum of planning. Need to replace Torrence and Prioleau. What’s the deal there, is he (PP) engaged to GW’s daughter or something?
"I think we agree, the past is over" - George W Bush
"The greatest enemy of knowlege is not ignorance; it is the illusion of knowledge" Stephen Hawking
agree about keeping Betts on the roster
He would’ve been at practice and ready to go this week. But instead of putting Ivory on the practice squad, they should have sent Arrington back there, or tried to trade him. Why do you keep a 6th WR that doesn’t play special teams on the roster??
Hartley deserves a knock....
…but he’s not the only one.
Football is a team sport. Lots of guys contributed to the Saints scoring 24 points and the Falcons scoring 27 points.
I swear to Breesus, it looked for a while there like giving our D-Line and LBs a gallon of Pepto Bismol wouldn’t have helped them stop the runs.
In the immortal words of Socrates, "I drank what?"
by SaintSooner on Sep 27, 2010 2:10 AM CDT reply actions 1 recs
REC'D
"It's about time something good like this happened." Drew Brees
by saints_r_us#9 on Sep 27, 2010 11:49 AM CDT up reply actions
Lots of bad stuff yesterday
1) First and foremost, something I never thought I’d say – BAD COACHING DECISIONS, particularly in OT. Icing the kicker timeouts are STUPID, and for that alone, they deserved to lose.
2) Defense needs to be more consistent against the run. They’d have 3-4 good plays, hold the RB to -3 yards, then give up a 7+ rush.
3) Henderson. TWO dropped balls that ended drives. TWO. Unacceptable.
4) Drew. He doesn’t seem “on” right now. He’s missing open receivers, making bad decisions, and not just yesterday. But, speaking of yesterday: on the first INT, he under threw a receiver that was BEHIND his defender – if he leads his receiver down the field, it’s at least a long reception, and without game film I can’t be sure, but I’m thinking the guy scores on that play, as I saw no deep help from the ATL secondary; the second INT was just piss-poor decision making, I am all for never quitting, but making a throw as your falling down to a receiver that is covered is just…well…too FAR-VUH like for me – go back to being DREW, stop pressing.
Who Dat? TWO DAT! Do dat AGAIN!!!
Oh, left out one:
5) Either figure out how to cover TE’s with your current personnel, or go find personnel that CAN cover TE’s. We’ve been killed by them for 3 straight games, and gotten lucky to win the first two. Find a way to take away the opponent’s TE, or suffer the consequences.
Who Dat? TWO DAT! Do dat AGAIN!!!
by GSO Saints Fan on Sep 27, 2010 6:56 AM CDT up reply actions
Well put GSO
Everything you mentioned is unacceptable. We are not in sync. And the Icing the kicker crap is a joke.
All valid points
and I agree w/ all of ’em
"I want the gas pedal down." Sean Payton
I'm a Saints fan--Hubby's a Bears fan.
by SaintsChick on Sep 27, 2010 10:57 AM CDT up reply actions
Might I add one thing GSO...
6) You don’t give the ball to an unproven, inexperienced RB on a 4th and 1 in a crucial part of the game.
"It's about time something good like this happened." Drew Brees
by saints_r_us#9 on Sep 27, 2010 11:55 AM CDT up reply actions
how would the commenters be acting today
if the 2 missed FGs against Minnesota had come back to bite us in the a$$ that Thursday night to open the season and we were sitting at 1-2?
I think the frustration on Hartley is definitely a result of both Vikings game and this game (and maybe residual from Tampa game last year), not just Sunday.
I like the kid and he showed amazing guts (no, not gut) in the postseason last year. Maybe we should have kept Carney as kicking coach.
"Bow Down Before The One You Serve"
I don't understand why they let him go as a consultant
the guy was near gold with him by his side. Why mess with a good thing?
"I want the gas pedal down." Sean Payton
I'm a Saints fan--Hubby's a Bears fan.
by SaintsChick on Sep 27, 2010 10:58 AM CDT up reply actions
Offensive Genius had a Brain Fart
Take away 3 downs from one of the best offenses in football to march out a kicker that already missed 2 FGs this season then give Bryant 2 attempts at a game winner. I don’t like those odds. It’s one regular season loss, but it stings like hell, and I’m pretty annoyed with Payton’s play calling at the end. Not sure what the reasoning was. That’s assuming reason even came into play.
I am just hoping and praying that last nights
play calling, Brees’ int, and that god awful thing we call a run game was an aberration and that next week our offence will come out firing on all cylinders, and our defence will be stopping the run and the effing TEs, and that fpk will hopefully earn the right to be called money again.
"It's about time something good like this happened." Drew Brees
i kick that field goal each time
if we wouldve run the ball and fumbled it would’ve been “Why didn’t we kick the FG?”. If you don’t trust your kicker to make that kick then you go for it on 4th down. Also, the Saints had turned the ball over 3 previous times in that game. That seems like a cause for concern as far as running the ball
Superbowl bound!!!...I know! do you?! Go Saints!!
Drew Brees > Garret Hartley
That’s really all that needs to be said. I trust Brees to make the right decisions in those spots. I don’t take the ball (and the game) out of his hands until I have to.
And no, I wouldn’t question the play call if it happens to result in a turnover. It’s the right call despite the outcome.
" If you don’t trust your kicker to make that kick then you go for it on 4th down." And if you don’t trust your offense in that spot then I guess you march out the kicker every time you get within the 30 yard line and take the points…

by 




























