Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: The Most Dangerous Division in Sports

Rock Out with Your Lockout: NFL Work Stoppage for Dummies

March 4th, 2011.

For those that don't know, that's the day the current NFL collective bargaining agreement expires and it's now only 45 days away. The possibility of an NFL lockout has been discussed here and there throughout the 2010 season but as the date nears and after a Super Bowl champion is crowned in Arlington this February, it will no doubt take center stage in the football world. 

So to make sure we're all on the same page and know exactly what we're talking about in future discussions, I've put together this beginners guide containing all the basic information you need to know; a lockout FAQ of sorts written for someone with zero to little background knowledge of the situation. It's a complex, complicated situation, however, so keep in mind that there are many more angles, viewpoints, details and motives that come into play and that I have simply not covered. 

Hopefully this will foster some great conversation and serve as a good starting point for all future discussion about this all-important topic.  

Star-divide

What is collective bargaining?

The dictionary defines it:

-noun; the process by which wages, hours, rules, and working conditions are negotiated and agreed upon by a union with an employer for all the employees collectively whom it represents.

In the case of the NFL it's between the players, represented by their union the NFLPA, and the team owners. Those negotiated and agreed upon rules are called a collective bargaining agreement. 

 

What is the current NFL collective bargaining agreement?

There are all kinds of stipulations, but it's the revenue sharing that's currently in the spotlight. Right now, the players receive 59.6% of the total revenue (after the owners take a little off the top as part of a credit) and the owners receive the rest. There is also a revenue-sharing plan in place among the owners that calls for the 15 highest-earning franchises to financially support the 17 lowest-earning franchises.  

 

Okay, it's pretty simple so far. So what's all the hub-bub about?

The current agreement between players and owners is about to expire on March 4th, 2011. In March of 2006, NFL owners voted unanimously (30-2) in favor of extending the current CBA that was already in place. Then in May 2008, they voted unanimously to opt out of the agreement two years early, which will be this March. There are no plans of a new agreement in place.

 

Why the sudden change of heart by the owners?

In short: the late Gene Upshaw, NFLPA executive director, was one sneaky son-of-a-gun. He was able to get a player-friendly agreement signed in 2006. Yahoo!'s Michael Silver explains it best...

Many owners believe that the late Gene Upshaw, who served as the NFLPA's executive director for a quarter-century, caught then-NFL commissioner Paul Tagliabue in a weak moment and muscled through an extension to the CBA that was, in essence, a resounding victory for the players.

Upshaw, they believe, knew that Tagliabue - who was preparing to step away after a 17-year stint as commissioner which included unprecedented labor peace - was loath to tarnish his legacy by ending his tenure with a messy fight between the players and owners.    

 

Why do the owners think they deserve more money?

There are a couple of reasons, a major one of those being the actual football stadiums themselves. Things have changed since 2006. Have you noticed how many teams are playing in new or renovated stadiums? The owners claim the cost of doing business is rising, particularly paying for those stadiums, so they need more money. Like everyone else, the owners have been dealing with the rough economic climate.

A handful of owners are also not happy with the current revenue sharing plan among themselves. Some owners have sweet deals in place that call for the city or additional taxes to foot the bill for most stadium expenditures, like our very own Superdome. Others, like Jerry Jones of the Dallas Cowboys, came out of pocket themselves to pay for their state-of-the-art facilities and now have huge loans to pay down. But if the Cowboys are one of the top 15 highest-earning franchises, the current agreement might call for Jerry Jones to write a fat check to someone like Arizona Cardinals owner Bill Bidwell, even though Bidwell is probably doing just fine financially thanks to significantly lower overhead and little to no stadium costs. 

 

What do they suggest?

Basically, the owners want to take more off the top before slicing up the pie for sharing. Instead of a $1 Billion owners credit, they want to take $2.4 Billion, a number they think is fair and realistic. The players would still be taking 60% of the pie, it would just be a smaller pie.  

In case you're a visual person, I've created this little graphic. The left is the way money is shared in the current collective bargaining agreement and the right is what owners would like to see in a new agreement. 

Nflrevenueshare_medium

 

So where do the sides stand now?

There hasn't been much progress and right now things aren't looking so good. NFLPA officials said last week that there have been no bargaining sessions since before Thanksgiving and no future bargaining sessions are scheduled. The owners will meet on Tuesday in Atlanta. 

The players are happy with the current agreement and want to avoid any possible lockout. Kevin Mawae, the retired NFL center who is the union's president recently said...

"We want to be on the field. We don't want a lockout. We didn't ask for this. We didn't opt out"   

But before starting negotiations, the player officials want to see some financial information from the owners...

"We are willing and ready to negotiate anytime they want to," said Indianapolis Colts center Jeff Saturday, a member of the players' executive committee, "but unless they have any meaningful information to give us ... there's not a whole lot to talk about."

On the other side of the table, the owners aren't backing down and appear steadfast in their resolve to get what they want. Listen to what Jerry Richardson - owner of the Carolina Panthers and co-chair of the NFL's Management Council Executive Committee which is responsible for labor negotiations - had to say earlier this month...

"There are 32 owners and 32 opinions and as you know I am the co-chair of the committee and I have been chair for a number of committees through the years. I would say that we are the most united we have been. In 2006, ‘07 and ‘08 we generated $3.6 billion in new revenue. The players have gotten $2.6 billion of the revenue and 32 teams have gotten $1 billion. And we have a negative cash flow of $200 million. Now, I don't think many business schools would say that's a model that's going to sustain itself and we have tried to explain that as best we could to the representatives of the Players Association.

I am not as optimistic as some are that we're making much progress. I get a lot of letters each day from union representatives from all over the world and somebody is spending a lot of time on things like that which I believe are counterproductive and we're not spending enough time trying to come to some resolve."No one has fought for labor peace more than I have.

The realities are that states, counties, cities and nationally, things are not well economically and I don't know what to believe on unemployment. I don't know if it's 9.6, 9.8 or 10 percent, but it's a bad number and we can't sustain revenue production like we have had in the past and it's just a reality. One of the first things that was said to me when I meet with union lawyers is, ‘Mr. Richardson, we want more money, more benefits and we want to work less.' And then they say, ‘Let's begin negotiations.' And I'm not optimistic we're making a lot of progress."

 

Who has the leverage?

That's tough to say. Obviously there will be some money lost if no NFL football is played, but the owners are slightly insulated because they can still collect checks from their network TV contracts even if no football is played, though it has to be repaid. 

The players have a little leverage as well. The NFLPA could choose to decertify as a union, thus giving them the ability to sue the NFL for antitrust violations. You might remember Drew Brees writing on this subject last post-season. Some teams, including the Saints, have already voted earlier this season to decertify.

 

What is going to happen if there actually is a lockout!?

That's anybody's guess. Some things are more certain than others. There will still be an NFL draft. Players will still remain property of their teams, however, there would be no free agent signing period, no trading, no rookie camps, minicamps or organized team activities. Players cannot even walk into team facilities. 

There may be games played with replacement players just like in 1987. NFL players might make a move over to the UFL for the time being. Or they could even start their own league. With no CBA, players will not be held to any restrictions regarding marketing deals or be monitored for any drug use. It will be pandemonium. 

 

That sounds scary! Can't they just work out a new CBA already?

Eventually we can assume there will be a new CBA. Obviously it's just a question of when. To reach an agreement there's going to have to be compromise from both sides. Chances are good that an 18-game regular season will become a reality as a way to increase owner revenue without cutting player salaries too much if at all. A longer season means increased physical demand on players which means medical coverage and benefits for retired players will also get brought up at the bargaining table. The implementation of a rookie wage scale (like the NBA) will probably be used as a bargaining chip and included in a finished agreement as well. 

 

What can I do?

I'm not sure the owners are looking for your help but the players are reaching out. You can sign the petition at NFLLockout.com. Tomorrow is #LetUsPlay day, which will be "an online blitz of the Block the Lockout message "LET US PLAY" from NFL Players across social media outlets." You can participate in that and help spread the word if that's your kinda thing. 

Don't forget that you, as a consumer, hold all the power with every NFL-related purchase you make. No matter what you believe, you can do your talking with your wallet or purse. Without your money, the NFL would cease to exist. Forget about the players and owners, it's all about you

Poll
Will there be an NFL lockout?
Yes
312 votes
No
224 votes

536 votes | Poll has closed

Comment 30 comments  |  1 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I dont believe there will be a lock out

Look what happened to baseball after their strike the game has never been as popular

Say what ever you want we still have our Lombardi and there's nothing you can do about it

by mississippisaintsfan on Jan 17, 2011 6:10 AM CST reply actions  

Here's what Jerry Richardson meant to say

“One of the first things that was said to me when I meet with union lawyers is, ‘Mr. Richardson, we want more money than you’re offering, more benefits than you’re offering, and we want to work less than you want us to work.’”

Fixed that for you, Jerry. You’re welcome.

It was worth the wait.

by MtnExile on Jan 17, 2011 7:34 AM CST reply actions  

Great post Dave

I posted this already about a week ago but it may be worth re-having a look. Fairly long reading…

Bring the metal....

by bondcrash on Jan 17, 2011 7:57 AM CST reply actions  

Another important thing to mention about Jerry Jones

When he put down a ton of money on that new gigantic stadium, he assumed football revenue would cover all of his costs. Every Sunday that he doesn’t have 90,000 butts in his seats is a Sunday that he’s losing money on that investment. TV contracts are only going to keep paying his bills for so long. It seems that he would have more incentive than anyone to make sure he keeps his team playing.

But yes, I think it will come to a lockout. And I think the owners will be able to outlast the players unless Drew Brees starts giving the other players all of that Nyquil money he has stashed for a time like this. Because we all know Ray Lewis isn’t going to share any of his Old Spice money.

"I want to hand this trophy to the MVP of the Super Bowl -- and the MVP of the entire league.''
-- Saints coach Sean Payton, handing the Vince Lombardi Trophy to Drew Brees after Super Bowl 44.

by VAsaintsfan on Jan 17, 2011 8:59 AM CST reply actions  

It seems that he would have more incentive than anyone to make sure he keeps his team playing.

And yet Jerry Jones is on record as saying a lockout is not a big deal. It’s probably a big deal to the businesses in New Orleans where I charge up my credit card when I don’t show up for games next year because they’re cancelled due to the lockout. Me and everybody else who comes into town for games.

Who knows where or when old wounds will mend?

by stujo4 on Jan 17, 2011 9:14 AM CST up reply actions  

Jerry’s comments weren’t directed at the public…they were directed at his creditors. “No worries…I’ve got it covered. Really. Trust me. Now excuse me while I change my suit, it’s kinda damp.”

It was worth the wait.

by MtnExile on Jan 17, 2011 9:45 AM CST up reply actions  

I think decertification would be a huge gamble, and is ultimately a bluff.

When the Supreme Court ruled against the NFL’s “single entity” argument with regards to the contracts with Reebok last year, the Court acknowledged that the nature of a professional sports league necessitated some collective action on the part of the individual teams that might otherwise be unlawful collusion in other industries. As long as the meat of the CBA covers issues the League can demonstrate are reasonably related to issues of competitive balance, players filing individual actions alleging violations of anti-trust law could be very risky. And the ramifications of de-certifying the NFLPA as the are fairly significant. Under federal labor law, once a union is certified as the bargaining representative of the employees for matters governing terms and conditions of employment, employers are legally obligated to negotiate with the union. This includes employment contracts, which is why NFL agents must be certified by the NFLPA. De-certification would make it more or less a free-for-all from that standpoint. I guess the question is how badly the parties want to avoid a work stoppage, which is in no-one’s interests.

by Nabb1 on Jan 17, 2011 9:11 AM CST reply actions  

With the number of viewers for this season alone, that should motivate everyone involved to get their act togeter.

To somewhat piggyback off of Stu from another fanshot, I am thinking that at the core of basic capitalism as long as there is potential for profits these owners will avoid this lockout because their main objective is to produce a profit.

We know there is a potential because our American society highly values it’s football season.

Yes, time flies. And where did it leave you? Old too soon...smart too late. - Mike Tyson

by lovingmma25 on Jan 17, 2011 2:12 PM CST up reply actions  

you underestimate their greed

PFT:

"The biggest area right now is that I believe there are owners out there — prominent owners — that if the system isn’t fixed to where it was a lot closer to pre-’06 levels than it is now . . . I think there are some owners would rather just lose the season." "[Some owners] hate this system that much," King said. "They would rather find another way to pay the mortgage on their stadiums . . . that’s how badly they want this system overturned."

They don’t want a profit. They want a BIGGER profit.

Out with the truckers and the kickers and the cowboy angels

by stujo4 on Jan 17, 2011 3:56 PM CST up reply actions  

As much as I hate them for doing it. Can you blame them?

The goal of businesses are to maximize profits in the long term. Their profit in the long term is diminishing and they feel threatened. It’s good business on their part, unless of course they end up scaring away all their customers by making people angry.

Offseason Motto: Burn the damn black pants.
"The future's so bright, I gotta wear shades." - Timbuk3
Canal Street Chronicles-you know you want to

by Jon Banks on Jan 17, 2011 5:13 PM CST up reply actions  

Let’s review Aesop’s fable, The Goose That Laid The Golden Egg, shall we?

Man just can’t help but grasp for more until he has nothing, so someone has to step in and save him from himself. Hello, I’m from the government and I’m here to help.

Out with the truckers and the kickers and the cowboy angels

by stujo4 on Jan 17, 2011 10:04 PM CST up reply actions   1 recs

WARNING! WARNING! WARNING!

Hope at-least the old-timers got my Lost in Space reference. This is a warning to all parties who are making their living off of the revenues generated by the fans. My mother was a die-hard baseball fan until the last strike. She and many other fans completely abandoned the sport during that time and many have not returned, including by mother. Yes the NFL has quite a loyal gathering of fans, but do you really want to test “their” resolve with a lock-out. Many are already upset with the No Fun League, over all the excessive fines and trying to turn the game into the wimp league. Its in every-bodies interest to have a new agreement, the players, the owners, and in case they have forgotten, most importantly to the fans. After all none of them would be making anything if we, the fans, did not go to, watch, and buy the merchandise. Also the networks can bring pressure because their revenues will also take a major hit if they lose the season. I mean really, look at all the viewing records that were set just this year.

Agree that a lot of issues need to be resolved . Mainly the rookie contracts that have gotten way out of hand. The 18 game season is really not the back-breaker that it is made out to be. I am satisfied with the 16 game format or the 18 game season. Don’t really see a big deal here because the other two games are played anyway abet meaninglessly. Allow players to return from IR after a period of time, extend roster sizes, Add another bye,(plus on this is, longer season to comment in the chronicles,HA,HA), and work out a health plan for the players. Really can they do much worse than Congress.

When I say WHO DAT U say TWO DAT!!!

by cajuncommando58 on Jan 17, 2011 10:02 AM CST reply actions  

P.S

Does anyone want to see the influx of “reality” programs that will will be coming to replace Football.

When I say WHO DAT U say TWO DAT!!!

by cajuncommando58 on Jan 17, 2011 10:07 AM CST reply actions  

I’ll spend that free time supporting Virginia Beach’s new UFL team instead. Our stadium seats a whopping 6000 people…. sigh…. its really hard to get excited about watching Brooks Bollinger play. Our team has 4 or 5 former Saints players, but sadly, none of the ones I ever enjoyed watching. Maybe Fakhir Brown won’t suck this time around….

"I want to hand this trophy to the MVP of the Super Bowl -- and the MVP of the entire league.''
-- Saints coach Sean Payton, handing the Vince Lombardi Trophy to Drew Brees after Super Bowl 44.

by VAsaintsfan on Jan 17, 2011 10:45 AM CST up reply actions  

With the ratings for football this year I have to believe that these “owners” are not going to allow a lockout. It just doesn’t compute. With billions of dollars on the line they really can’t get this together?

Yes, time flies. And where did it leave you? Old too soon...smart too late. - Mike Tyson

by lovingmma25 on Jan 17, 2011 12:43 PM CST reply actions  

Ooops. Sorry, Dave.

I voted “NO” because I thought it was up to me.

Reading all the comments, I guess it’s still up in the air, huh?

Fat, dumb, and happy. Hell, two out of three ain't bad!

I Want To Die In My Sleep Like My Grandpa – Not Screaming and Yelling Like His Passengers.

by Just 'Nother Day on Jan 17, 2011 2:55 PM CST reply actions  

FYI I know you dont see this but the UFL was banking on a lockout. They have even said it.

The UFL is small, but its football none the less. College games will have more followers then ever, and expect to see even the small colleges to have nice crowds if the Lockout does happen. Also the UFL can take players from college. Sure the High round players wont go to the UFL, But The late rounders will.

by Ranger565 on Jan 17, 2011 4:47 PM CST reply actions  

FYI I know you dont see this but the UFL was banking on a lockout. They have even said it.

I didn’t include it in the post but this is correct. They were definitely banking on the lockout.

Wanna say something? Sign up! It's free!

by Dave Cariello on Jan 17, 2011 7:43 PM CST up reply actions  

My gut still thinks they will be disappointed. In some ways I’d actually kinda like the UFL to survive. But if it doesn’t, oh well, not the end of the world.

But I think there is something else planned. I just don’t see them going for the lockout. I wouldn’t be surprised if they are just trying to get rid of Doty. From what I hear they hate his guts because they think he’s ridiculously and blatantly biased against them. (And personally, I’m somewhat of that opinion myself, and I don’t even have a dog in the fight.) IF that’s true, and IF I was one of those owners and felt he’d cheated me like that, I’d be willing to risk a LOT to get rid of him. If letting the CBA lapse would do that, I’d take that route in a new york microsecond. And then afterward I’d be happy to negotiate knowing that he was gone and we’d have a shot at a fair hearing in the future.

by FriarBob on Jan 17, 2011 10:28 PM CST up reply actions  

i don't completely understand...

but from reading this article it seems like the owners aren’t being terribly unreasonable. Several different writers including Dave have commented on how the PA caught them at a weak moment to get a better deal for the players. Unless Richardson is skewing his numbers there should be a change in the owners favor. I don’t know if it’s as much as they are saying but clearly it’s not working. I agree with what someone said about changing the rookie rules. IF you feel cheated by Reggie’s pay why don’t you go talk to the raiders about Russel. Like i said i really am not educated on this but from what i’ve heard it seems that both groups are not being reasonable about this yet most people feel like the owners are sticking it to the players. Honestly, its hard to feel bad for either party. They are all making quite a bit of money to play a game for around 6 month’s a year.

by bannor d on Jan 17, 2011 7:23 PM CST reply actions  

What ticks me off....

Player salaries have NO basis in reality. Fans are already being gouged for every possible dollar. Salaries need to fall back in line with reality as they have been out of control for years and it’s time for players to understand that they are blessed to have the ability to play this game and I for one have no sympathy for millionaires fighting millionaires. What other job in the world guarantees a raise for doing nothing more than getting hired one year later? Go on strike. Lock ‘em out. I can’t afford tickets anyway. Come back when tickets are about $50 each and cokes are $1.

by TX Saint on Jan 17, 2011 7:24 PM CST reply actions  

Player salaries are based in the reality of the revenues generated for owners by their efforts on the field. That said revenues are so high isn’t the fault of Scott Fujita & co.

If I am good I could add years to my life / I would rather add some life to my years.

by Jay Preece on Jan 17, 2011 8:56 PM CST up reply actions  

What ticks me off…. Player salaries have NO basis in reality.

Why? Without the players, the owners have nothing. Why should Jerry Jones make hundreds of millions of dollars a year as manager when the players do all the work for several million a year?

Out with the truckers and the kickers and the cowboy angels

by stujo4 on Jan 17, 2011 10:08 PM CST up reply actions  

because....

he takes all the financial risk. He pours all his money into building staff and team an hopes that it will create a franchise that will bring in fans and consumers. If fans stop paying those players still get paid while he goes into a financial hole. I don’t feel bad for either party but to say the player are some sort of victims is nuts. My personnel opinion is that all the money that is currently getting splurged deciding which rookie is the best would be better spent on players who have career ending injuries and retirement funds.

by bannor d on Jan 18, 2011 5:25 PM CST up reply actions  

because….he takes all the financial risk.

There is no risk. With revenue sharing, no NFL franchise loses money.

Out with the truckers and the kickers and the cowboy angels

by stujo4 on Jan 19, 2011 10:38 AM CST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

The ultimate community for lovers of all things Black and Gold! The latest news, commentary, discussion, linkage and more! Join in the conversation now with all of your fellow Who Dats!

Featured Poll

Poll
How much do you think Drew Brees is worth per year? (avg. over life of contract)
Less than $17M
152 votes
$17M
52 votes
$18M
136 votes
$19M
183 votes
$20M
575 votes
$21M
212 votes
$22M
98 votes
$23M
523 votes

1931 votes | Poll has closed

Twitter-logo_medium


Head Coach

Erindavewhodat_small Dave Cariello

Assistant Coach (Editor/Contributor)

13088_f520_small David "Satch" Kelly

0113wbphillips_small Hans Petersen

Offensive Coordinators (Contributors)

Saintslogo_small Andrew Juge

Titans_small Jack Sharkey

316807_10150333101899753_504374752_8049350_806276562_n_small Alex Swift

Squat_small Preston J. Gary, Jr.

100media36imag0036_small Travis Dauro

Vgfl_logo_small_small Adesola Badon

Small Jimmy Angel

Small Jordan Katz

Small Win Ellington

Super-bowl-44_small Wallace Delery

Thomas_photo_small Thomas Hukel

Angrywhodat-saints-gold-50pct-bright-grey-outline_small_small The Angry Who Dat