New Orleans Saints Offensive Player Grades vs. Giants
When your offense puts up 49 points and gains 577 yards, a lot of people need to be playing well. Needless to say the grades are going to be good all around. Very, very good.
Quite simply the Saints did whatever they wanted against the Giants. I feel like in the Payton era we've seen maybe four times a season where the offense fires on all cylinders and cannot be stopped at all. This was one of those nights. Drew Brees led the troops with yet another masterful performance. Make the jump for the grades.
Drew Brees: A+ (3.36) I realize we're splitting hairs here but one of the toughest grades was deciding between an A and an A+ for Brees. He said there were some throws he'd like back, and he's right. Two in particular, a hook route over the middle to Henderson and an out route to Sproles were jumped and should have been intercepted. He also overthrew some seam routes a few times in this game. My initial thought was 24 out of 38 is too low of a completion percentage for an A+. But then I thought about every time he missed a throw and he'd come back on the very next play and gash the Giants all the same. His play wasn't totally perfect, but the end result was. Plus, he gets the boost for two reasons: the 8 yard touchdown run/juke move/faux dunk, and the two sacks he escaped on the same play before getting a first down passing to Thomas. Brees' strength doesn't get nearly enough credit but his core and balance is as good as any athlete out there and that play proves it. I also want to commend him for a pass he threw where he was getting hit and he managed to fire a 15 yard skinny post into Henderson for a first down. He didn't have his feet set, he was off balance and he was getting hit on that play, and Henderson was open but coverage was tight. For him to fit the ball in that window was shocking given the duress he was under. Again, his strength for his size is superhuman, and I don't think enough people respect Brees for the ridiculous arm strength he has. He finished 24-38 for 363 yards, 4 touchdowns, no turnovers, and a touchdown run. When he plays like that the Saints cannot be beat.
Mark Ingram: B+ (2.56) A nice stat day for him as he finished with 80 yards on 12 carries and a touchdown, though his 35 yard TD run boosts those numbers immensely as it came late in garbage time. Still, he ran hard in between the tackles and was particularly good in short yardage situations. He was also helpful in the passing game with 2 receptions for 14 yards.
Pierre Thomas: A (3.06) I feel like give the exact same write up for PT every single week. "He did the most of his chances but should have gotten more touches". Stop me if you've heard it before. I'm not going to even bother griping over this one again. I just don't understand the pitch count. He's clearly the best back on the team and should see the ball more. He had 8 carries for 63 yards and a touchdown, and 3 catches for 47 yards. That's 110 yards on 11 touches!!
Darren Sproles: B+ (3.15) I don't love his decision to take out some of those kickoff returns but neither came back to really bite him. He ripped off a couple big runs but was neutralized on the others. I feel like his carries are always either hit or miss. He never has a "pretty good" run. He's either stopped or he breaks one. He had 8 carries for a healthy 54 yards, and 2 catches for 28 yards.
Jed Collins: A- (3.00) His blocking was exceptional. Some of the back end seal jobs he did on misdirection runs in particular was amazingly good. He was physical in the trenches and brutal off the edge. Very good performance.
Marques Colston: B- (3.00) He had 3 catches for 78 yards including a huge 50 yarder late in the first half that helped set up the 21-3 lead. He wasn't used as much as usual but he made his catches count. He did have a horrible drop on a crossing route right in his hands wide open that could have gone for a nice gain.
Lance Moore: A (3.03) He had 5 receptions for 54 yards and 2 touchdowns. His first TD was reminiscent of the 2 point Super Bowl play, where he caught the ball on an out route and showed terrific athleticism getting to the goal line. He made big plays and moved the chains.
Devery Henderson: B+ (2.36) He was a big factor in the offense this week. The Giants often left him in single or zone coverage and Brees did a great job finding him. This wasn't an explosive game for Devery, who filled the role of a possession guy in this one. It was great to see him involved and he did a fantastic job catching the ball securely and moving the chains. He had 5 catches for 67 yards.
Robert Meachem: C- (2.30) He was a willing blocker but he was never even targeted on passing plays. A complete afterthought in the gameplan this week. It's hard to punish him too much grade wise when he wasn't given a chance, but the fact remains this has been a largely soft and disappointing season for him.
Jimmy Graham: A- (3.24) Tough to grade his performance. On the fake field goal, he did a great job shedding the first tackle but a poor job recognizing where the sticks were and making that play. He's athletic enough to stretch out and get that first down. He finished with 5 catches for 84 yards and 2 touchdowns and was his usual explosive receiving self. He was guilty of offensive pass interference, and he still has areas of his game he needs to clean up. He's quickly becoming the best receiving tight end in the NFL, though.
John Gilmore: B+ (2.15) Fantastic job blocking off the edge and bringing a physical presence to the running game.
Jermon Bushrod: B+ (2.70) He was one of the best blockers on the team on running plays. Numerous times he got off the edge and threw devastating lead blocks for Sproles on his big runs and Ingram on his touchdown run, among others. He was helped by the ankle injury to Osi Umenyiora who gave Bushrod trouble before he left. Bushrod had a bad sequence where he had a false start, then got beat leading to Brees getting a big hit. Still, an overall solid showing especially on the ground. He continues to have a very respectable season.
Carl Nicks: A+ (2.88) He dominated. Pure and simple. A textbook game top to bottom. The Giants were completely abused by Nicks. The push he got off the line of scrimmage on every single play was humbling. He is an animal. This is the second A+ he's gotten in 2 weeks. On one play the Saints recognized a overload blitz to the right and the entire line shifted magically to contain it giving Brees ample time, then they brought a delayed blitzer from the backside edge and Nicks rotated over to completely nullify it. It's not that he's just strong and powerful, he's smart and he moves well. A truly memorable night for Nicks.
Brian de la Puente: A- (2.63) Great showing. He pulled well, created huge lanes up the middle for the runners, and gave Brees a mostly clean pocket. The Saints may have their center of the future.
Jahri Evans: B (3.15) The Giants had exotic rushes and for the most part the line rotated perfectly, with the possible exception of Evans. At times he looked confused on lost by the packages. Clearly the Giants had no interest in attacking him, but I do think Evans could have done a better job of recognizing that and rotating over to the right edge to help Strief. Most of the big running plays were off the left side, but he did a decent job in run blocking.
Zach Strief: B+ (2.89) A fantastic job containing Justin Tuck. Tuck had two knock downs, but he was always a step way too late getting to Brees. I also love how Strief is always in the middle of the pile pushing his teammates forward, picking them up, getting Giant players away from Jimmy Graham while he's on the ground... He's just a guy you can tell that's a great teammate. He's a throwback player that plays the game the right way. He reminds me of Stinchcomb in that way. Since returning from his knee injury his play has been outstanding.
Pat McQuistan: C+ (1.89) Came in numerous times as the extra blocker and he did fine, although he did need to get redirected by Brees on where he lined up twice, probably because he's still getting used to a weird position and the offense in general.
My Offensive Player of the Game: Drew Brees
26 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Move all the remaining Saints games into primetime
I need more of this sort of cowbell…
by Valmo on Nov 30, 2011 9:34 AM CST reply actions 1 recs
Took the words right out of my mouth
I LOVE PRIME TIME!!!!
I spent 8 years trying to reach him...and then another 7 trying to keep him locked up because I realized what was living behind that boy's eyes was purely and simply...Evil.
Dr. Sam Loomis Aka (Donald Pleasence)
The good thing is
That our tougher of the 5 are at home in primetime. The only other that scares me is in tenn but ill be there and im 9-1 on the road so I like our chances
by touchdown my pants on Nov 30, 2011 10:28 AM CST via mobile up reply actions
Up Devery a little
he had a HUGE hit/block on Ingram’s 35 YD TD Run.. it was nuts. He de-cleated the the guy on the block. he was actually pretty good on run blocking throughout the game
Poor Chris Ivory
…snooze, you lose.
"I have had a perfectly wonderful evening, but this wasn't it." Groucho Marx
Well, if they aren't going to use him
Might as well trade him for a nice draft pick after the season.
Plenty of time for someone to get hurt.
Can’t never have too many good RBs on your roster if last year is any indication.
R.I.P. Andy Rooney
by cajuncommando58 on Nov 30, 2011 11:46 AM CST up reply actions
I agree
this is a good problem to have
Just because we have chiseled abs and stunning features, it doesn't mean that we too can't not die in a freak gasoline fight accident.
by Fat Punk Kicker on Nov 30, 2011 12:29 PM CST up reply actions
Next year maybe we need to get 3 or 4 kickers....
LOL.
Our fat punk kicker, Garrett Hartley, missed a game-winner and we lost for the second week in a row - Scott Fujita in 2009
by Ragin Who Dat on Nov 30, 2011 1:22 PM CST up reply actions
I wish there was an option for Offensive Line
I would have voted for the OL. Brees was never sacked and had ample time to throw the ball. Running lanes were huge. Since the Rams game, this OLine has really come together as a unit. Outstanding.
Our fat punk kicker, Garrett Hartley, missed a game-winner and we lost for the second week in a row - Scott Fujita in 2009
+1
I would almost expand it to protection/blocking in general. The entire offense did an outstanding job at keeping Brees clean and the chips and blitz pickups by our RBs and TEs were spot on for the majority of the game. I loved that on the play where Brees avoided the two tackles, Pierre initially chipped a rusher to give Brees that extra split-second to escape and then it was Pierre downfield who got open for the first. Just a tremendous play from both guys.
by sammasaaron on Nov 30, 2011 11:06 AM CST up reply actions
Good point....
Everyone involved in pass protection or run blocking should get credit, not just the O-line. The RB’s and TE’s have really added a dimension to the game by chipping or blocking.
Our fat punk kicker, Garrett Hartley, missed a game-winner and we lost for the second week in a row - Scott Fujita in 2009
by Ragin Who Dat on Nov 30, 2011 11:13 AM CST up reply actions
I think Strief should have gotten an A
Your write-up about strief was all positive. You used terms like “outstanding”, “great”, “fantastic”. I agree. Maybe he had some negative plays, but I didn’t notice them. He looked pretty beastly to me. Just saying…..
Our fat punk kicker, Garrett Hartley, missed a game-winner and we lost for the second week in a row - Scott Fujita in 2009
Ok...bit of a gripe here.
We constantly say things like “Brees throws to who is open” etc. We all know this…it’s pretty much fact at this point. If you’re open, Brees will try to find you. So maybe we should stop with talk like “Meachem was a complete afterthought in the gameplan”….and realize he’s simply not getting open. If he was on the field for pass plays…he’s being given a chance. Beat your man…and you’ll get the ball.
-Lombardi was wrong...it's the internet, not fatigue that makes cowards of us all. But then again, what do you expect. Not like the guy could see the future.
Apparently he was open when Brees got hit and the ball floated about 20 yards…thankfully not an INT. It was the play where Gruden bet Jaws hid per diem that Brees was going to take a shot. I think the next play was a TD to Graham.
by BlackandGold4ever on Nov 30, 2011 11:42 AM CST up reply actions
Also notice Jeff...
They were doubling Jimmy, which is why Devery had the chance to make some plays. Could Robert be getting the same coverage? Just a thought. He has been so uninvolved that I haven’t really be paying much attention to him.
R.I.P. Andy Rooney
by cajuncommando58 on Nov 30, 2011 11:49 AM CST up reply actions
The only real times i’ve seen Meachem open this year…is on busted coverages or man where he used his speed to eventually beat the defender deep. I just find it odd that Colston and Moore can constantly find a soft spot in zone…but Meachem and Henderson rarely if ever do.
-Lombardi was wrong...it's the internet, not fatigue that makes cowards of us all. But then again, what do you expect. Not like the guy could see the future.
Thats not their job
They spread the defense out which opens up the soft spots for colston and moore. Watching from my seat u can really tell.
by touchdown my pants on Nov 30, 2011 12:37 PM CST via mobile up reply actions
yep they Devery and Meachem are the deep guys....
But they had a few cool plays with Devery where he basically traded places with Graham. They sent Graham deep (he was double covered) and Devery across the middle. Usually it’s the opposite. Anyway, Devery made his catches, and it was nice to see the Saints mix it up a bit.
Our fat punk kicker, Garrett Hartley, missed a game-winner and we lost for the second week in a row - Scott Fujita in 2009
by Ragin Who Dat on Nov 30, 2011 1:25 PM CST up reply actions
I think Mr. Juge did a good job of listing Drew's mistakes.
It’s just tough to crap on a guy’s grade when he rolls up 5 TD’s.
But you do have some advantages watching from the end-zone. That’s why they shoot practice film from the end zone. It would be great if you could provide some detailed insights from the EZ that us TV-watchers can’t get.
It would be great if you could provide some detailed insights from the EZ
Well, that’s not going to happen.
I'm not like everybody else
I had end-zone seats in Anaheim when the Rams were here.
And there were a lot of things we could see that the typical TV view doesn’t show. Particularly how the defensive secondary is playing—tight, loose, zone or man-to-man, very easy to see. Also the rushing lanes the DL was taking (the Rams right DE always went straight up the field, never any loops or swim moves).
Thanks for your pictures.

by 


























