Preston’s Saints @ Titans Preview: What a Hassle!
By Preston J. Gary, Jr.
I'll never forget the last time the Saints faced Matt Hasselbeck. The banged-up veteran quarterback had a vintage performance against a banged-up Saints secondary, leaving many Saints fans calling for Roman Harper's head. In addition, a Seattle defense frustrated Drew Brees and the offense, while Marshawn Lynch had perhaps the best postseason run in recent memory. I don't think any Saints fan will be able to forget that for a while.
So while I am heading into Sunday's matchup feeling good about the groove Drew Brees and the offense are in, I have much trepidation at the prospect of facing Matthew Hasselbeck and a hot Chris Johnson.
Make the jump for more...
The Saints can clinch the division and/or a playoff spot with a win and a combination of losses on Sunday. The Titans are fighting for a wild card berth and the slim hope of a division title. The Titans spent the first couple of months trying to find consistency, and I think they found it over the last month with the resurgence of Chris Johnson. Johnson is the key to their offense, their strength.In the first month of the season, the Titans lost Kenny Britt for the year. While waiting on Chris Johnson to earn his pay, Hasselbeck got accustomed throwing the ball to Nate Washington, Damian Williams, Lavelle Hawkins, and Jared Cook. It's not exactly the plethora of talent the Saints have at wide receiver, but with a running game and a quarterback who takes care of the ball, it's been enough to keep the Titans in most games.
Washington, who leads the team in catches, has a banged up ankle and has missed practice this week, but he will play Sunday (he hurt his ankle against the Bills but continued to play through the pain). Let's hope he isn't too effective. The second leading receiver for the Titans is Chris Johnson - though you could say that the RB is the leading target because Johnson and RB Javon Ringer have more combined catches than any WR on the team.
While Tennessee's passing offense doesn't scare me at first glance, the memory of Hasselbeck with a few no-name WR's in the great northwest picking apart a Gregg Williams defense does, much the same way Chris Johnson invokes the memory of that Lynch run.
On defense, the Titans are typically "bend but don't break". They've kept all but four opponents to under 17 points. While the stats aren't all that impressive, their pass defense is the strength of their defense. Cortland Finnegan and Jason McCourty make a fine duo at corberback. However, McCourty suffered a concussion against the Bills, and may not play against the Saints. If he is ruled out, it will spell big trouble for the Titans.
If you listen to the Titans this week, their defensive game plan sounds like that of the Saints. In essence, the Titans are accepting the fact that the Saints will move the ball and accumulate yards; their goal is to limit the Saints to field goals through smart, physical play. Their defensive coordinator sounds like Gregg Williams, going as far as saying that his secondary needs to "put fear in guys" (specifically Jimmy Graham) by laying big hits on routes that occur in the middle of the field.
So it looks like the Titans plan to punch the Saints in the mouth, and keep punching until the clock expires. Anything they can do to disrupt Drew Brees and the timing of the offense will keep the game close and allow Chris Johnson to remain a factor. I don't believe the offense will look smooth and well-oiled against Tennessee. It will be a game where the Saints look "just a little off". The Saints will have to remain patient on offense - utilizing the run earlier, and Gregg Williams will have to put his guys in better positions to succeed, because until the offense can get a good lead, the Titans will keep this game close, Falcons-style, and that worries me.
I've heard the argument "over the last four games the defense has only allowed __ points in the first half while the Saints built their lead" and "the Saints are ok with teams throwing for 600 yards because they are up by such a large margin, what do you expect the other team to do?" I'll tell you what I expect. Do you know what a big lead SHOULD do for a defense? It should result in more turnovers and more sacks because the opposition is one dimensional. Gregg Williams sends more blitzes than anyone else, yet they don't get there. When he isn't blitzing, he's pretending to before the snap.
How about we abandon all this exotic display of "coaching genius" and just play defense? Or just actually coach fundamentals, you know, like wrap up and tackle, catch the freaking ball, play disciplined - as in staying in your gap, zone, or sticking with your assignment? Here's a question - if the pressure does not get there in time and the secondary is giving the WR's a big cushion, what happens when the QB dumps it off short? How many first downs did we see the opponent get on third and long with a short throw and no one in the vicinity to make the tackle?
Yes, the Saints lack playmakers at linebacker, yet they have talented guys along the defensive line and in the secondary. How about we stop blitzing sub-par linebackers, focus on more stunts and penetration (as opposed to gap assignments), and let the CB's play physical bump and run? In other words, how about forgetting being exotic and versatile for the sake of being exotic and versatile and instead play to the strengths of the personnel and put them in better positions to succeed? I've seen coaches like Mike Nolan, Mike Zimmer, Romeo Crennel, and more have good defenses with lesser personnel. Instead of being "exotic," they just play fundamentally sound. They don't have 100 different formations and packages; instead of being a "jack of all," they're a "master of one."
My point? If the personnel can't do what the scheme is calling for, change the damn scheme. If you blitz more than anyone else in the NFL and the players can't get to the QB, stop blitzing, because all you are doing is making the secondary more vulnerable by taking players out of coverage. When you don't have great "three-down" linebackers, you can't be versatile and do the same things a team like Pittsburgh or Baltimore can do. When you lack a David Harris/Bart Scott duo, you can't be exotic and get away with it. Simply put, when the talent does not fit the scheme, you need to change the scheme.
You may ask why I've gone off on this tangent in the midst of my Saints versus Titans analysis. The answer is that the Saints (Gregg Williams) need to play Tennessee straight-up on defense because Matt Hasselbeck knows his tricks, and Chris Johnson is licking his chops. The Titans can beat the Saints on Sunday by frustrating the offense and confusing the defense with play-action. Everything will work for Tennessee when the game is close. I fear the Saints offense will get disrupted enough to allow the Titans to stay within their offensive game plan. If Gregg Williams doesn't put his players in a better position to succeed and doesn't call a more honest game, the Titans may upset the Saints in the same frustrating fashion Seattle did back in January.
I believe this game will be closer than many expect it to be. How well the defense plays will give us a good indication of how they'll look in the post-season against more balanced teams with physical defenses. Here's to hoping no injuries occur during a 31- 27 Saints victory.
Stat Time
Overall Offense
1. Saints - 32.8 Points Per Game, 449 Yards Per Game, 6.5 Yards Per Play, 53% 3rd down conversion, 31:10 Time Of Possession, -2 Turnover Margin
22. Titans - 20.8 PPG, 319 YPG, 5.3 YPP, 39% 3rd down, 27:58 TOP, +5 TOM
Passing Offense
1. Saints - 325 YPG, 8.1 Yards Per Attempt, 70.4% completion, 30 TDs, 11 INTs, (50) 20+yard pass completions, 21 sacks given up, 105.5 QB rating
18. Titans - 222 YPG, 6.7 YPA, 60.2% completion, 17 TDs, 10 INTs, (32) 20+ yard completions, 17 sacks given up, 83.9 QB rating
Rushing Offense
8. Saints - 123 YPG, 4.8 Yards Per Carry, 13 TDs, 2 Fumbles, (11) 20 + yard runs
28. Titans - 97 YPG, 4.0 YPC, 6 TDs, 3 Fumbles, (12) 20+ yard runs
Defense
18. Titans - 19.1 PPG, 356 YPG, 5.2 YPP, 42% 3rd down conversions allowed, 10 Fumble Recoveries
27. Saints - 22.4 PPG, 379 YPG, 5.9 YPP, 35% 3rd down conversions allowed, 5 FRs
Pass Defense
18. Titans - 234 YPG, 6.5 YPA, 61.6% completion, 17 TDs, 10 INTs, (41) 20+ yard pass completions allowed, 22 sacks, 83.7 opposing QB rating
30. Saints - 264 YPG, 7.2 YPA, 58.3% completion, 19 TDs, 7 INTs, (37) 20+ yard completions, 25 sacks, 87.7 opposing QB rating
Rush Defense
16. Saints - 115 YPG, 4.9 YPC, 9 TDs, 7 FR, (11) 20+ yard runs allowed
21. Titans - 122 YPG, 4.1 YPC, 6 TDs, 9 FR, (10) 20+ yard runs allowed
Overall Statistical Analysis: This is a matchup where the statistics don't tell the entire story. It would do better to take a snapshot of the last four weeks. In that span, Chris Johnson has returned to form and nearly doubled both the yardage and touchdowns he had in the first eight games. Without Kenny Britt, Johnson is the offense.
In the same span, Drew Brees has had one of his best months ever. On the way to building a big lead in the NFC South, the Saints running backs have combined for 100 or more yards as in afterthought each of the last four weeks. The Saints defense has only been "good" at the most critical moments.
The Titans have forced more turnovers, though they've given up more explosive plays and third down conversions. The Saints may make a few mistakes, and Chris Johnson may help to keep it close for a while, but Drew Brees and the offense should continue to manufacture explosive (20+ yard) plays on the Titans defense. The Titans settle for field goals far too often because they lack a diverse WR group, and that will be the difference.
59 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Vintage performance
To be honest, the Saints made Hasslefart look good in that playoff game. His passes were horrible air balls that would have been picked off had there been anyone within 20 yards of the receivers he was throwing them to. It’s payback time. Sack him. Intercept him. Make him look like the mediocre QB we should have beaten the stink out of last time.
I seem to remember that he did pretty well against us in the regular season game as well, just a few weeks before.
But that was in the Dome, and our offense lit them up.
The grade that you receive’ll be your last, we swear
So make Bad Horse gleeful, or he’ll make you his mare!
“His passes were horrible air balls that would have been picked off had there been anyone within 20 yards of the receivers he was throwing them to.”
SWEET!!! If he does the same thing this time, PRob’s gonna get 2+ INT’s.
by Dan Kelly on Dec 10, 2011 3:49 PM CST up reply actions 1 recs
Sadly,
I think we’re just going to have to get used to the cushions our DBs give receivers. Despite the fact that we all hate it, I don’t see Williams abandoning it anytime soon, if for no other reason than because he seems like a pretty stubborn guy. My only hope is that the Saints DBs are running hands drills in practice every week now and stop dropping INTs, and eventually the scheme starts to pay dividends in the turnover department, which is the only possible reason I can see for consistently running such a risky package in the first place.
temperature will be cold and the ball will be like a rock
and I see that making the Saints D less likely to hang onto the ball
WIN NOW
WINGRAMANIA!!!!
by Hans Petersen on Dec 10, 2011 7:36 AM CST up reply actions
Makes the Titans O less likely to hang on to the ball, too
Conclusion: They who run most effectively win this game…
Hehehehe.
I live about an hour and a half away from Nashville. That’s frigid cold for us Tennessee folks.
That’s still above 0. That’s beauty weather
Mark Ingram-OROY
Cam Jordan-DROY
New Orleans Saints-2012 Super Bowl Champs
true
it’s all about perspective
PLAY NOW
TUSKAMANIA!!!!
by Hans Petersen on Dec 10, 2011 10:02 AM CST up reply actions
thats not frigid cold
or maybe i’m just cold natured, but i love it when its in the teens and 20s.
40 degrees is easy
by Ice0ne (CAJ) on Dec 10, 2011 10:21 AM CST up reply actions
Sounds like good fishing weather to me.
R.I.P. Andy Rooney
by cajuncommando58 on Dec 10, 2011 4:26 PM CST up reply actions
I can't remember the last time the Saints faced a Hot Johnson
oh, wait, I think he meant something else
like Tulane’s new head football coach
PLAY NOW
TUSKAMANIA!!!!
Great rant on the Saints D, Hans
I’ve been calling this D the " Emperors New Clothes " defense. Everyone wants to see something that isn’t there. I’ve been told " they are giving up all these yards because they are so far ahead "… I’m not buying it. Whats going to happen when the Saints are 2 TD’s behind and this D can’t get off the field. Anyway, I’m with you on this Hans. The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over, expecting a different result…Keep on blitzing GW, maybe we can get you some couch time in the off season.
Great rant on the Saints D, Hans
You mean, Hans Pretending To Be Preston.
I'm living for giving the Devil his due
sorry - I cut, pasted, and edited those into CSC story formats from a word doc Preston sent me
I guess me thinking the headline would clearly ID it as not my original work was wrong: Preston’s Saints @ Titans Preview.
I meant no subterfuge or trickery, readers, but you have my apologies if you were bamboozled and feel cheated…
I’m getting ready to work on the Fleur-de-Links to go up later today and then write my Hot Reads to go up tomorrow morning, so all will be back to normal…
PLAY NOW
TUSKAMANIA!!!!
by Hans Petersen on Dec 10, 2011 2:50 PM CST up reply actions
Thanks Hans! I figured out it was a problem with my router needing a firmware update
Stop wearing a wishbone where your backbone ought to be. Would you be convicted in court of being a Christian? Happiness is shared, and comes from sharing.
by Preston J. Gary, Jr. on Dec 10, 2011 11:03 AM CST reply actions
Thanks Hans! I figured out it was a problem with my router
So, content is actually the work of Mr. Preston J. Gary, Jr. and not HansDat? A clever deception to get me to read the fanpost, gentlemen. Well played.
I'm living for giving the Devil his due
unintended sir, and you have my apologies
PLAY NOW
TUSKAMANIA!!!!
by Hans Petersen on Dec 10, 2011 2:50 PM CST up reply actions
look to J1K for the Way
PLAY NOW
TUSKAMANIA!!!!
by Hans Petersen on Dec 10, 2011 4:43 PM CST up reply actions
Gregg Williams needs to go.
He hasn’t made much adjustments and doesn’t seem to know how to use his personnel.
Hey, if he can make it taste like that looks, I'd eat it.
Kudos for the sig line; not too many BOC references floating around these days. At least I hope that’s a BOC reference…
The grade that you receive’ll be your last, we swear
So make Bad Horse gleeful, or he’ll make you his mare!
yes, let's get rid of him- we are the second team in power rankings- let's disrupt the whole ship (sarcasm font)
If Pro is the opposite of Con, what is the opposite of Progress? Congress!
-Men's Restroom - House of Representatives, Washington, DC
Power rankings are meaningless
And serve no other reason than to give NFL analyst something to talk about and attempt to look smart. Gregg Williams does need to go because of his refusal to change his defensive scheme (even though it would better the team) for the mere reason that he likes to be labeled as an aggressive coordinator. He is living in 2009. Somebody needs to let him know that his blitzes haven’t worked in a couple of years.
Make sure I'm all the way dead because I'll come back and make you my b****-Captain Spaulding
by AcquiredPanic on Dec 10, 2011 9:36 PM CST up reply actions
Yes, the Saints lack playmakers at linebacker
Well, maybe they can pick up Bobby Carpenter as a free agent. GAAA!!
play to the strengths of the personnel and put them in better positions to succeed?I think GDub is doing that by blitzing.
good defenses with lesser personnel.I think you may be overvaluing the Saints’ defensive personnel. I don’t think these guys can play much better now in any scheme. The 2009 guys Sharper (9 picks), Charles Grant (5.5 sacks), and Hargrove (5 sacks) are all missed.
I'm living for giving the Devil his due
sorry, we need to blitz
Tennessee receivers are not that great and Hasslbeck is new with them this season so pressure is needed to make them crack. Sitting back and giving a quality veteran like Hasslebeck all the time in the world would be just as disastrous as doing so against Brees, Brady etc. It becomes like practice for them and they pick and pick and pick.
Obviously the priority is CJ- he needs to be contained. Not stopped,just contained.
But as far as the passing game- disrupt. Go with whatever got you into first place in the NFC South, with whatever got you to 9-3, whatever got you to the third seed and threatening to be a second seed. In essence- go with who you are and don’t try to reinvent yourself 3/4 of the way into the season – even if you are not perfect- no defense is.
Our turnovers have been coming lately and our offense is not turning over the ball. When we blitz, the defenders who don’t blitz have less responsibility- 1.5 seconds of responsibility vs. 3 – 4 seconds without a blitz. . That works for us.
Don’t fix it if it ain’t broke. Don’t try to be who you ain’t. Don’t go down without swinging with your best punch. If you go down, go down swinging.
We are the second best team in the NFL, extremely close to the best team. We can improve- I don’t think Green Bay will improve. They have nowhere to go but stay level or go down. And, injuries can be a big factor. Steady as she goes for us. All we have to do is execute OUR defensive plan. Our offense is good enough to cover our defensive rough spots. But we have to be who we are.
If Pro is the opposite of Con, what is the opposite of Progress? Congress!
-Men's Restroom - House of Representatives, Washington, DC
Well said. The time to change things up has passed.
If you’re going to make major adjustments to play style, don’t do it right now – you’ll only confuse everyone. If it still doesn’t work make changes in the off-season.
This scheme
Has already confused our players. How often do you hear the commentators say “That was a blown coverage by the Saints?”
Make sure I'm all the way dead because I'll come back and make you my b****-Captain Spaulding
by AcquiredPanic on Dec 10, 2011 9:28 PM CST up reply actions
We don't get any pressure when we blitz
It is pointless. All it does is make it harder on our secondary. It is maddening to see us blitz, everyone who blitzes gets picked up, and then no one can even penetrate the O-line regardless of how many we bring. I’ve seen them actually just give up trying to get to the quarterback. So if we blitz and no one can get through, isn’t that a little counter productive? It just makes it more difficult on our secondary to have to deal with one on one coverage, undermanned, and without any pressure on the QB.
Make sure I'm all the way dead because I'll come back and make you my b****-Captain Spaulding
by AcquiredPanic on Dec 10, 2011 9:25 PM CST up reply actions 1 recs
yes, we do get pressure when we blitz. Clearly we do. We often don't get a sack, but we cause the QB to release the ball
quicker than he wants to, and receivers to adjust their routes. Roman Harper has 5 or 6 sacks- those are from blitzes. He is not a DL. If our blitzes never worked, Harper wouldn’t be leading the league in sacks by a defensive back.
If Pro is the opposite of Con, what is the opposite of Progress? Congress!
-Men's Restroom - House of Representatives, Washington, DC
Disagree.....we suck at blitzing
We are ranked 19th in sacks. (NFL.com)
We are 30th against the pass.
We are 28th in interceptions.
All despite the fact that we blitz more than any other team.
We will get the occasional sack here and there by Harper just just because he is our best blitzer and the frequency in which we send him. How many times do we get a sack for a loss but the opposing team picks up the first down anyway? We will get a sack occasionally but we can’t do it on a consistent basis even though we blitz more than every other team.
Make sure I'm all the way dead because I'll come back and make you my b****-Captain Spaulding
by AcquiredPanic on Dec 10, 2011 11:03 PM CST up reply actions
AcquiredPanic you make good points but...we do need to blitz!!!
Check out plays where we’ve sent only four or three to rush the QBs this year: we get KILLED! If our blitzers are not getting home, it is mostly the fault of the blitzers who are not executing the called blitzed correctly!
After all, GW isn’t on the field running the plays, he calls them…players have to go out there and MAKE THE DAMN PLAYS! At times you see two blitzers run into each other, ot erhtimes they’re just too slow getting to their gaps! It has happened numerous times this season!
As Philinwood noted, you can’t give a good, veteran QB, 4-5 seconds in the pocket, eventually he will find the open man!
We are a blitzing defense, because our front four just can’t put pressure on the QBs by themselves!
What we need is a better execution of the called blitzes and our freakin’ "greasy hands DBs need to hold on to the freakin’ ball!!! (they all need to attend a special “hands class” from Darren Sharper and drop the special hands class from the massage parlor next door)
Expect more...you'll get more...and if you don't, start over!
It is mostly the fault of the blitzers who are not executing the called blitzed correctly
It’s not their fault that they aren’t built properly for this scheme. We don’t have blitzing LB’s…they are too slow. If you tell me to do something I’m not good at, don’t be surprised when you aren’t happy with the outcome.
After all, GW isn’t on the field running the plays, he calls them
This is why I want him gone. He needs to call plays that utilizes the strength of our players, not our weaknesses.
you can’t give a good, veteran QB, 4-5 seconds in the pocket, eventually he will find the open man!
I agree with you completely. I know pressure is important. Instead of calling out our blitzers, I would prefer to call out or defensive line. Our blitzers have an excuse of why they can’t perform what is asked of them….our defensive line doesn’t.
because our front four just can’t put pressure on the QBs by themselves!
Completely agree. If the big boys would do their job up front, other players wouldn’t have to do it for them and we wouldn’t even be having the discussion. I’m not against blitzing to cover up the deficiency of our line…..I’m just against against the frequency that we use it.
What we need is a better execution of the called blitzes
We aren’t gonna get it with this group of players. We need better linebackers and a d line that can get pressure occasionally without help before our blitzes will be successful on a consistent basis.
Make sure I'm all the way dead because I'll come back and make you my b****-Captain Spaulding
by AcquiredPanic on Dec 10, 2011 10:41 PM CST up reply actions
I find it funny
That no matter how many times I proof read something, I always seem to find a mistake.
against against
I swear the brain only sees one word sometimes when it reads a double word. It’s almost like we have a biological autocorrect that takes mistakes and interprets them into what they are supposed to be.
Make sure I'm all the way dead because I'll come back and make you my b****-Captain Spaulding
by AcquiredPanic on Dec 11, 2011 12:32 AM CST up reply actions
speaking of the brain as a pattern seeker
Is this a vase, or….?

PLAY NOW
TUSKAMANIA!!!!
by Hans Petersen on Dec 11, 2011 7:21 AM CST up reply actions
this one's pretty wild

a whole Don Quijote theme…
PLAY NOW
TUSKAMANIA!!!!
by Hans Petersen on Dec 11, 2011 7:23 AM CST up reply actions
nobody wants to see this truck coming up in their rearview mirror

PLAY NOW
TUSKAMANIA!!!!
by Hans Petersen on Dec 11, 2011 7:25 AM CST up reply actions
Still, I agree with you.
The ideal way to run a defense is to get immense pressure on the QB with only the front 4 rushing the passer. Very few tems can do that. Actually, maybe 0 teams can do that if the offensive scheme is a good one such as utilizing chip blocks, double teams, screen passes, max protect, draw plays,etc. However, the second best defensive scheme is to get QB pressure any way you can and that would include stunts and blitzes. The second best defensive scheme is NOT to give the QB an abundance of time as if it’s a thursday practice session. No matter how many defenders you have out there, a QB such as Brees and a play caller such as Payton will find a way to take advantage by using plays that look safeties off, freeze LBs, locate single coverage, make back shoulder throws to a receiver who is covered like a blanket, throw to a seam in a zone, draw a pass interference call or an illegal contact, or exploit a mismatch. QBs in the NFL can do that so much easier in 4 seconds than 1.5 . Additionally, the more you rush 3 or 4 pass rushers fruitlessly, the more exhausted, ineffective, and discouraged DLs get. You had better believe when a blitz is called, everyone gets pumped and inspired- it’s GO TIME dude. It’s time to get the QB. Defenses like being aggressive, not passive.
If Pro is the opposite of Con, what is the opposite of Progress? Congress!
-Men's Restroom - House of Representatives, Washington, DC
There is a difference in maybe stunting your defensive line and sending a LB or S on a delayed blitz (delays and acts as if he’s in zone coverage until the blockers declare who they are blocking) and sending 7 or 8 people all at the same time.
My point is not to stop blitzing, but to stop sending so many people on the same blitz we (and the other teams) have been seeing for 3 years. Gregg Williams sees that 4 or 5 don’t get there, so he sends 7 or 8. I see 7 or 8 aren’t getting there and I ask why not change the way you send the pressure; change the delivery method instead of increasing the amount of blitzers.
Stop wearing a wishbone where your backbone ought to be. Would you be convicted in court of being a Christian? Happiness is shared, and comes from sharing.
by Preston J. Gary, Jr. on Dec 11, 2011 10:10 AM CST reply actions

by 




























