Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: UFC 146 Results: Junior dos Santos TKO's Frank Mir

Could Mixing It Up Improve the Saints Offensive Line?

Okay, so the offensive line has been the talk of the town for the past week or so. First the Saints get rid of Jon Stinchcomb, then they look like absolute garbage against the Houston Texans. Things aren't looking so great for the guys up front.

But last night I was giving it some thought and realized: perhaps with some minimal position shuffling the Saints could maximize their offensive line potential while improving its overall quality. Or...maybe I'm a moron. Make the jump and find out!

Star-divide

Carl Nicks has experience playing tackle, so why not move him over to LT and switch Jermon Bushrod over to the RT spot. Then bring in Matt Tennant to take Nicks' vacant spot at left guard. Basically, your starting offensive line would look like this:

Nicks - Tennant - Kreutz - Evans - Bushrod

I've never played a lick of football my entire life - and if I did it certainly wouldn't have been on the offensive line - so excuse me if I'm way off base here. But why couldn't the Saints do some creative shuffling like this? Is moving Bushrod over to the right side really that tough of an adjustment for a tackle to make? I know it happens. Would moving Carl Nicks to the outside be a stupid move? I've always heard that left tackle is the most important position on the offensive line, so wouldn't the Saints want their best player there? Or perhaps all of this would screw up way too many other things, including chemistry and comfort, to ever be worth it?

Tell me I'm a genius or tell me I'm an idiot. 

Comment 41 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I don't see why not

I think you may be on to something, but like you, I have no clue what the potential issues could be. Like how different are the positions on the O-line, and how much would moving people effect their individual play.

by jhenn2004 on Aug 25, 2011 1:06 PM CDT reply actions  

That would just create more question marks.

I have seen guys who were terrible tackles turn out to be pretty good guards so i would hesitate on doing the reverse of that and switching sides on the line is very difficult especially if you have only ever played one side. Add to that our interior line depth would go to zero. Its to late in the game to try something this drastic.

What in the HELL just happened!?

by GESWhoseBack on Aug 25, 2011 1:17 PM CDT reply actions  

From what I know...

Tackle is a position that highlights footwork, where guard highlights hands, so while they’re both on the O-line they have severly different skill sets required. Slow tackles can make good guards, but it’s hard to kick an interior lineman outside.

by saintsdevotee on Aug 25, 2011 1:25 PM CDT reply actions  

It seems a little risky / late in the preseason to shift around three players on the OL.

trapped in grammar and calendars.

by Jay Preece on Aug 25, 2011 1:38 PM CDT reply actions  

Yeah

I agree. That’s a problem.

Wanna say something? Sign up! It's free!

by Dave Cariello on Aug 25, 2011 2:01 PM CDT up reply actions  

Try it out in Madden first,

if it works there I say put it in against the Packers. At the very least it will confuse them.

by GlackAndBold on Aug 25, 2011 1:57 PM CDT reply actions  

lol

"It ain't about how hard you hit, it is about how hard you can get hit and keep moving forward, how much can you take and KEEP MOVING FORWARD. That's how winning is done!" - Rocky

by Dan Kelly on Aug 26, 2011 12:41 PM CDT up reply actions  

MO-RON

This all sounds really good on paper, but it wouldn’t work. Bushrod, Nicks, and Tennant would have to relearn the playbook. For a LT going to RT, the plays are usually opposite. Footwork is something that takes time. Bushrod and Nicks would have to get that down pat in just over two weeks. Left tackle is hands down the hardest offensive line position, and sure Nicks has experience, but not at a pro level. Horrible idea Dave.

by vanondubs on Aug 25, 2011 2:12 PM CDT reply actions  

It's not easy

Not only are the plays opposite, but the footwork is opposite. Used to leading with your left foot? Now lead with your right. Also, it’s easier to go from tackle to guard (although you’re probably too big) and center to guard, but it’s difficult to go the opposite direction.

by UPB13 on Aug 25, 2011 2:20 PM CDT up reply actions  

vanond:

surely you are not calling the author of this post a moron are you?

"I can eat oreos faster than him" Scott Fujita's take on Payton Manning SB44

by jeremysherwin on Aug 25, 2011 4:19 PM CDT up reply actions  

surely he's not

and quit calling him Shirley.

Offseason is over!!!!

by BRSaintsFan on Aug 25, 2011 5:13 PM CDT up reply actions  

he said we could call him idiot or genius

not moron

not imbecile

not bonehead

not jerkoff

not dumba**

not stupid

any other names we shouldn’t call him?

(says the guy who doesn’t like name-calling [in an ironic twist with the funny])

Thumbs up, everybody...
For rock and roll!!!!

by Hans Petersen on Aug 25, 2011 7:49 PM CDT up reply actions  

I prefer.. Mo Money!

Welcome to CSC!! Thanks for contributing!

→ Someone will be along shortly (hopefully) to recommend a profile pic.

"It ain't about how hard you hit, it is about how hard you can get hit and keep moving forward, how much can you take and KEEP MOVING FORWARD. That's how winning is done!" - Rocky

by Dan Kelly on Aug 26, 2011 12:43 PM CDT up reply actions  

The first half we had over 5 yards per carry

Courtesy of that “garbage” line… Come on Dave….

Bring the metal....

by bondcrash on Aug 25, 2011 2:22 PM CDT reply actions  

I think he was talking about pass protection.

They looked great running the ball, but Brees had little time to throw (though to be fair, the Jets have a great O-line and the Texans notched 7 sacks- 2 against their ones.)

Canal Street Chronicles-A place of great Saints news and information. Oh and the stuff I write!
Bring back Aaron Brooks! He's the only one who can save us from the evil that is Drew Brees!!

by Jon Banks on Aug 25, 2011 2:30 PM CDT up reply actions  

Meant “tackles” I think

Bring the metal....

by bondcrash on Aug 25, 2011 2:36 PM CDT up reply actions  

My recollection...

… is that the starting o-line was fine except for Jermon’s contact lens search and Kreutz’s inability to snap the football. A free runner at Brees’s blind side is one thing, but having him have to go up to get a shotgun snap over his head and then get off a pass before a blind side rusher gets there is another.

by GnomeChumpsky on Aug 25, 2011 4:08 PM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

Jermon’s contact lens search

Hilarious.

In Breesus' name we play

by Breesus Christ Superstar on Aug 25, 2011 5:42 PM CDT up reply actions  

bushrod will have one of those..

plays every once and again.. his footwork has betrayed him before.. although i think he is an adequate pass protector that requires a little help with elite pass-rushers.. not enough reason to panic & reshuffle the whole line.. cause you gave up a sack/fumble on a preseason game? don’t think so.. you only do that in the middle of the playoffs come desperate time.. or something.. the lack of depth is the real concern.. imho

by the 9th plague on Aug 25, 2011 6:49 PM CDT up reply actions  

Got to call you an idiot on this Dave. (You told me too)

Tackle and guard are just so radically different. Guards can be big fat boys that hold the gut against fat DT/NT and guards are usually great at run protection (holding their block and then moving up the field). At LT, he’d be Brees blind spot and be forced to move really quickly, and would face some of the fastest guys who can get lower than he can at 6’5" and either spin their way out of the block (Dwight Freeny for example) or just use their speed to outrun him to Brees.

Though tackles can move inside, (and because older tackles who lose their speed, can still have great blocking skills) it’s much harder for a guard to move outside. At least, imo. It’s certainly doable, but I’d rather have the best guard tandem than risk arguably the best guard in the league on a tackle experiment that doesn’t have a high chance of success.

Canal Street Chronicles-A place of great Saints news and information. Oh and the stuff I write!
Bring back Aaron Brooks! He's the only one who can save us from the evil that is Drew Brees!!

by Jon Banks on Aug 25, 2011 2:28 PM CDT reply actions  

I’d rather have the best guard tandem than risk arguably the best guard in the league on a tackle experiment that doesn’t have a high chance of success.

Couldn’t agree with this more. Keep in mind, Nicks was made a guard for a reason, his strengths are better suited to playing on the interior line.

by shipgoalie05 on Aug 25, 2011 2:34 PM CDT up reply actions  

They could try it in practice. Not a game.

Practice? We in here talkin’ bout practice?

"It ain't about how hard you hit, it is about how hard you can get hit and keep moving forward, how much can you take and KEEP MOVING FORWARD. That's how winning is done!" - Rocky

by Dan Kelly on Aug 26, 2011 12:46 PM CDT up reply actions  

Dave, Dave, Dave...

Are you feeling well? Feeling a bit space-cadet-ish? Knocked in the head by a flying Devery Henderson elbow?

I admire your creativity and thinking outside the box…but let’s try to keep it in the same galaxy.

Next week’s topic—-what if we played all three running backs at once in the wing-T

"I have had a perfectly wonderful evening, but this wasn't it." Groucho Marx

by BenDerDonDat on Aug 25, 2011 3:40 PM CDT reply actions  

Gotta try the wing T!

Or the wishbone…

Offseason is over!!!!

by BRSaintsFan on Aug 25, 2011 5:15 PM CDT up reply actions  

How about this

Leave the line as it is (for now), and run with two tight ends as a base formation, with both tight ends chipping pass rushers as necessary.

Think about it: you’d have Colston, Henderson/Meachem/Moore, Graham, Thomas, and Ingram/Thomas/Sproles in the route tree. That’s a pretty damned good group of targets for a heavy formation.

It was good while it lasted.

by MtnExile on Aug 25, 2011 3:51 PM CDT reply actions  

When running a 3-1-1 or even a 4-1-0 or all wide outs, just have them be quick 3 step drop passes or out of the gun.

With those tackles, it’s better to wait on the deep passes until the run game sucks the defense in.

Canal Street Chronicles-A place of great Saints news and information. Oh and the stuff I write!
Bring back Aaron Brooks! He's the only one who can save us from the evil that is Drew Brees!!

by Jon Banks on Aug 25, 2011 3:59 PM CDT up reply actions  

would that not be a max protect formation?

"I can eat oreos faster than him" Scott Fujita's take on Payton Manning SB44

by jeremysherwin on Aug 25, 2011 4:20 PM CDT up reply actions  

Not really

Max protect isn’t a formation, it’s a blocking scheme. You can certainly max protect more easily from a 2-tight end formation…but you could do the same thing using a running back and fullback.

You can also flood downfield zones from a 2-tight end set…and Jimmy Graham and Dave Thomas are fine receivers downfield. Or better blockers than Lance Moore and Robert Meachem. The formation is more flexible, if you’re worried about your offensive line.

It was good while it lasted.

by MtnExile on Aug 25, 2011 5:46 PM CDT up reply actions  

you can't stay with ONE max-protect formation for long..

just cause you are afraid of the pass-rush.. the old chip by the RB will appear again as needed specially against elite rushers.. there was no chip on the “contact lense” play cause it was play action all the way.. but imo.. wrongfully NOT rolling the QB out of the pocket.. bushrod had the TE on that side & he got beat by houston’s interior DE not the OLB.. it happens.. somebody open the stage trap door & he fell in.. he is not hopeless like some people make it seem

by the 9th plague on Aug 25, 2011 7:01 PM CDT up reply actions  

I got your back Dave

I do not know how many offensive line experts we have on the site, but one would think that you could entertain your idea to a certain extent.

The main difference i would see between a guard and a tackle is this:
A guard blocks paraell and side to side to the football field
A tackle main job is sealing the edge.
I would think that a probowl guard would do half way decent in a tackle position.

I am hoping that I am wrong, but I think our offensive line and our passing game is in for a rude awaking this season.
There is nothing wrong with a run-first offense.
I just hope Peyton gets that message, and puts down the NFL madden playbook this year.

"I can eat oreos faster than him" Scott Fujita's take on Payton Manning SB44

by jeremysherwin on Aug 25, 2011 4:25 PM CDT reply actions  

Mom wouldn't let me.

Though I never really had a desire. Played ice hockey.

Wanna say something? Sign up! It's free!

by Dave Cariello on Aug 25, 2011 6:58 PM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

Hockey is a great way to spend a childhood. I wasn’t allowed to play football until i turned 14.

Mark Ingram-OROY
Cam Jordan-DROY
New Orleans Saints-2012 Super Bowl Champs

by Alex Swift on Aug 26, 2011 7:39 AM CDT up reply actions  

If the problem persists into the regular season

I would seriously give thought to moving people around but I really don’t think we have given the O line a chance to get their chemistry together just yet. I’ve never really been a Bushrod fan and didn’t agree with with the Jammal Brown trade although I know he was expensive and the draft picks would help. I would have liked to seen Brown, Nicks, and Evans all playing together at the height of their abilities.

You must lose everything in order to gain anything.-Tyler Durden

by AcquiredPanic on Aug 25, 2011 6:11 PM CDT reply actions  

I kinda question signing Kreutz-he may be great but I suspect bringing him in has thrown-off the O line’s chemistry…let Tennant start and Kreutz back him-up this season!

How’s that G/T Allen looking? He’d be a great pick-up if he pans-out…also, what about Butler? I’d rather see him signed-over Ingram…

by EZRider2 on Aug 25, 2011 6:21 PM CDT reply actions  

No, Not A Good Idea

As former O-line man and a coach of the position for ten years, I can say you are over reacting just a bit. Though I am not sold on Bushrods ability to play left tackle.

Keep the inside three where they are. You need continuity at the position. You have to know what the person next to you is doing and who he is blocking. That is why you see them pointing and making line calls. Not to mention they are three of the meanest, nastiest people to play their positions.

 Bushrod needs a jump rope, so he can improve his foot speed, and hang cleans to simulate popping out of his stance quickly in pass pro. He needs to improve on his technique.

 He leans on people instead of moving his feet to keep them in the proper position. I also see him kick and turn his shoulders to soon. He should be kicking back a step or two(depending on drop of QB) and setting up on the DE’s mid line with his outside foot. He should also be punching a lot better to disrupt the forward momentum of the DE. However, when you are slow out of your stance and have to make up for that you tend to turn your shoulders and run at the DE, opening up a short corner to the QB. If the De feels that he will wait until you are off balance and counter back inside.

  I would feel better if we picked up a tackle or two after the first cuts are made. I think Black could be an answer as well. Brown is a year away and needs to stay healthy to get the reps needed.

Just my opinion, I’m sure the coaches know what they have and are working on the solution as we speak.

by CaSaintsfan on Aug 25, 2011 8:30 PM CDT reply actions  

Cool analysis

You should comment more like this.

by GnomeChumpsky on Aug 25, 2011 10:09 PM CDT up reply actions  

Let’s just put it this way… it is possible to do this and make it work.

It’s not, however, easy to pull off. You need the right players, the right scheme, and you also need TIME to develop the new line alignment. We might have the first two, not sure on that, but we clearly do NOT have the time at this point.

But it’s still not impossible. True, there are a lot more examples where a crappy tackle moves in to guard and becomes a pretty good guard. But there are ALSO situations in which a great guard has moved out and become a decent tackle (or, more rarely, even a good one).

I suspect that Nicks COULD do it if we were desperate. But I also would rather us just find a decent tackle somewhere. Better yet, I’d prefer somebody already on the roster to shape up enough that we don’t have to go shopping for one.

by FriarBob on Aug 26, 2011 2:48 PM CDT reply actions  

having a good balance with the running/passing game can help that a lot too

If Pro is the opposite of Con, what is the opposite of Progress? Congress!
-Men's Restroom - House of Representatives, Washington, DC

by Philinwood on Aug 26, 2011 5:47 PM CDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

The ultimate community for lovers of all things Black and Gold! The latest news, commentary, discussion, linkage and more! Join in the conversation now with all of your fellow Who Dats!

Featured Poll

Poll
How much do you think Drew Brees is worth per year? (avg. over life of contract)
Less than $17M
152 votes
$17M
52 votes
$18M
136 votes
$19M
183 votes
$20M
575 votes
$21M
212 votes
$22M
98 votes
$23M
523 votes

1931 votes | Poll has closed

Twitter-logo_medium


Head Coach

Erindavewhodat_small Dave Cariello

Assistant Coach (Editor/Contributor)

13088_f520_small David "Satch" Kelly

0113wbphillips_small Hans Petersen

Offensive Coordinators (Contributors)

Saintslogo_small Andrew Juge

Titans_small Jack Sharkey

316807_10150333101899753_504374752_8049350_806276562_n_small Alex Swift

Squat_small Preston J. Gary, Jr.

100media36imag0036_small Travis Dauro

Vgfl_logo_small_small Adesola Badon

Small Jimmy Angel

Small Jordan Katz

Small Win Ellington

Super-bowl-44_small Wallace Delery

Thomas_photo_small Thomas Hukel

Angrywhodat-saints-gold-50pct-bright-grey-outline_small_small The Angry Who Dat