Could Mixing It Up Improve the Saints Offensive Line?
Okay, so the offensive line has been the talk of the town for the past week or so. First the Saints get rid of Jon Stinchcomb, then they look like absolute garbage against the Houston Texans. Things aren't looking so great for the guys up front.
But last night I was giving it some thought and realized: perhaps with some minimal position shuffling the Saints could maximize their offensive line potential while improving its overall quality. Or...maybe I'm a moron. Make the jump and find out!
Carl Nicks has experience playing tackle, so why not move him over to LT and switch Jermon Bushrod over to the RT spot. Then bring in Matt Tennant to take Nicks' vacant spot at left guard. Basically, your starting offensive line would look like this:
Nicks - Tennant - Kreutz - Evans - Bushrod
I've never played a lick of football my entire life - and if I did it certainly wouldn't have been on the offensive line - so excuse me if I'm way off base here. But why couldn't the Saints do some creative shuffling like this? Is moving Bushrod over to the right side really that tough of an adjustment for a tackle to make? I know it happens. Would moving Carl Nicks to the outside be a stupid move? I've always heard that left tackle is the most important position on the offensive line, so wouldn't the Saints want their best player there? Or perhaps all of this would screw up way too many other things, including chemistry and comfort, to ever be worth it?
Tell me I'm a genius or tell me I'm an idiot.
41 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I don't see why not
I think you may be on to something, but like you, I have no clue what the potential issues could be. Like how different are the positions on the O-line, and how much would moving people effect their individual play.
That would just create more question marks.
I have seen guys who were terrible tackles turn out to be pretty good guards so i would hesitate on doing the reverse of that and switching sides on the line is very difficult especially if you have only ever played one side. Add to that our interior line depth would go to zero. Its to late in the game to try something this drastic.
What in the HELL just happened!?
From what I know...
Tackle is a position that highlights footwork, where guard highlights hands, so while they’re both on the O-line they have severly different skill sets required. Slow tackles can make good guards, but it’s hard to kick an interior lineman outside.
But Nicks DID play guard. There's got to be some talent there, no?
Wanna say something? Sign up! It's free!
by Dave Cariello on Aug 25, 2011 1:29 PM CDT up reply actions
It seems a little risky / late in the preseason to shift around three players on the OL.
trapped in grammar and calendars.
Yeah
I agree. That’s a problem.
Wanna say something? Sign up! It's free!
by Dave Cariello on Aug 25, 2011 2:01 PM CDT up reply actions
Try it out in Madden first,
if it works there I say put it in against the Packers. At the very least it will confuse them.
MO-RON
This all sounds really good on paper, but it wouldn’t work. Bushrod, Nicks, and Tennant would have to relearn the playbook. For a LT going to RT, the plays are usually opposite. Footwork is something that takes time. Bushrod and Nicks would have to get that down pat in just over two weeks. Left tackle is hands down the hardest offensive line position, and sure Nicks has experience, but not at a pro level. Horrible idea Dave.
It's not easy
Not only are the plays opposite, but the footwork is opposite. Used to leading with your left foot? Now lead with your right. Also, it’s easier to go from tackle to guard (although you’re probably too big) and center to guard, but it’s difficult to go the opposite direction.
vanond:
surely you are not calling the author of this post a moron are you?
"I can eat oreos faster than him" Scott Fujita's take on Payton Manning SB44
by jeremysherwin on Aug 25, 2011 4:19 PM CDT up reply actions
he said we could call him idiot or genius
not moron
not imbecile
not bonehead
not jerkoff
not dumba**
not stupid
any other names we shouldn’t call him?
(says the guy who doesn’t like name-calling [in an ironic twist with the funny])
Thumbs up, everybody...
For rock and roll!!!!
by Hans Petersen on Aug 25, 2011 7:49 PM CDT up reply actions
I prefer.. Mo Money!
Welcome to CSC!! Thanks for contributing!
→ Someone will be along shortly (hopefully) to recommend a profile pic.
"It ain't about how hard you hit, it is about how hard you can get hit and keep moving forward, how much can you take and KEEP MOVING FORWARD. That's how winning is done!" - Rocky
The first half we had over 5 yards per carry
Courtesy of that “garbage” line… Come on Dave….
Bring the metal....
I think he was talking about pass protection.
They looked great running the ball, but Brees had little time to throw (though to be fair, the Jets have a great O-line and the Texans notched 7 sacks- 2 against their ones.)
Canal Street Chronicles-A place of great Saints news and information. Oh and the stuff I write!
Bring back Aaron Brooks! He's the only one who can save us from the evil that is Drew Brees!!
My recollection...
… is that the starting o-line was fine except for Jermon’s contact lens search and Kreutz’s inability to snap the football. A free runner at Brees’s blind side is one thing, but having him have to go up to get a shotgun snap over his head and then get off a pass before a blind side rusher gets there is another.
by GnomeChumpsky on Aug 25, 2011 4:08 PM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
Jermon’s contact lens search
Hilarious.
In Breesus' name we play
by Breesus Christ Superstar on Aug 25, 2011 5:42 PM CDT up reply actions
bushrod will have one of those..
plays every once and again.. his footwork has betrayed him before.. although i think he is an adequate pass protector that requires a little help with elite pass-rushers.. not enough reason to panic & reshuffle the whole line.. cause you gave up a sack/fumble on a preseason game? don’t think so.. you only do that in the middle of the playoffs come desperate time.. or something.. the lack of depth is the real concern.. imho
by the 9th plague on Aug 25, 2011 6:49 PM CDT up reply actions
Got to call you an idiot on this Dave. (You told me too)
Tackle and guard are just so radically different. Guards can be big fat boys that hold the gut against fat DT/NT and guards are usually great at run protection (holding their block and then moving up the field). At LT, he’d be Brees blind spot and be forced to move really quickly, and would face some of the fastest guys who can get lower than he can at 6’5" and either spin their way out of the block (Dwight Freeny for example) or just use their speed to outrun him to Brees.
Though tackles can move inside, (and because older tackles who lose their speed, can still have great blocking skills) it’s much harder for a guard to move outside. At least, imo. It’s certainly doable, but I’d rather have the best guard tandem than risk arguably the best guard in the league on a tackle experiment that doesn’t have a high chance of success.
Canal Street Chronicles-A place of great Saints news and information. Oh and the stuff I write!
Bring back Aaron Brooks! He's the only one who can save us from the evil that is Drew Brees!!
I’d rather have the best guard tandem than risk arguably the best guard in the league on a tackle experiment that doesn’t have a high chance of success.
Couldn’t agree with this more. Keep in mind, Nicks was made a guard for a reason, his strengths are better suited to playing on the interior line.
by shipgoalie05 on Aug 25, 2011 2:34 PM CDT up reply actions
They could try it in practice. Not a game.
Practice? We in here talkin’ bout practice?
"It ain't about how hard you hit, it is about how hard you can get hit and keep moving forward, how much can you take and KEEP MOVING FORWARD. That's how winning is done!" - Rocky
Dave, Dave, Dave...
Are you feeling well? Feeling a bit space-cadet-ish? Knocked in the head by a flying Devery Henderson elbow?
I admire your creativity and thinking outside the box…but let’s try to keep it in the same galaxy.
Next week’s topic—-what if we played all three running backs at once in the wing-T
"I have had a perfectly wonderful evening, but this wasn't it." Groucho Marx
How about this
Leave the line as it is (for now), and run with two tight ends as a base formation, with both tight ends chipping pass rushers as necessary.
Think about it: you’d have Colston, Henderson/Meachem/Moore, Graham, Thomas, and Ingram/Thomas/Sproles in the route tree. That’s a pretty damned good group of targets for a heavy formation.
It was good while it lasted.
When running a 3-1-1 or even a 4-1-0 or all wide outs, just have them be quick 3 step drop passes or out of the gun.
With those tackles, it’s better to wait on the deep passes until the run game sucks the defense in.
Canal Street Chronicles-A place of great Saints news and information. Oh and the stuff I write!
Bring back Aaron Brooks! He's the only one who can save us from the evil that is Drew Brees!!
would that not be a max protect formation?
"I can eat oreos faster than him" Scott Fujita's take on Payton Manning SB44
by jeremysherwin on Aug 25, 2011 4:20 PM CDT up reply actions
Not really
Max protect isn’t a formation, it’s a blocking scheme. You can certainly max protect more easily from a 2-tight end formation…but you could do the same thing using a running back and fullback.
You can also flood downfield zones from a 2-tight end set…and Jimmy Graham and Dave Thomas are fine receivers downfield. Or better blockers than Lance Moore and Robert Meachem. The formation is more flexible, if you’re worried about your offensive line.
It was good while it lasted.
you can't stay with ONE max-protect formation for long..
just cause you are afraid of the pass-rush.. the old chip by the RB will appear again as needed specially against elite rushers.. there was no chip on the “contact lense” play cause it was play action all the way.. but imo.. wrongfully NOT rolling the QB out of the pocket.. bushrod had the TE on that side & he got beat by houston’s interior DE not the OLB.. it happens.. somebody open the stage trap door & he fell in.. he is not hopeless like some people make it seem
by the 9th plague on Aug 25, 2011 7:01 PM CDT up reply actions
I got your back Dave
I do not know how many offensive line experts we have on the site, but one would think that you could entertain your idea to a certain extent.
The main difference i would see between a guard and a tackle is this:
A guard blocks paraell and side to side to the football field
A tackle main job is sealing the edge.
I would think that a probowl guard would do half way decent in a tackle position.
I am hoping that I am wrong, but I think our offensive line and our passing game is in for a rude awaking this season.
There is nothing wrong with a run-first offense.
I just hope Peyton gets that message, and puts down the NFL madden playbook this year.
"I can eat oreos faster than him" Scott Fujita's take on Payton Manning SB44
I can't believe you've never played football
In Breesus' name we play
by Breesus Christ Superstar on Aug 25, 2011 5:45 PM CDT reply actions
Mom wouldn't let me.
Though I never really had a desire. Played ice hockey.
Wanna say something? Sign up! It's free!
by Dave Cariello on Aug 25, 2011 6:58 PM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
If the problem persists into the regular season
I would seriously give thought to moving people around but I really don’t think we have given the O line a chance to get their chemistry together just yet. I’ve never really been a Bushrod fan and didn’t agree with with the Jammal Brown trade although I know he was expensive and the draft picks would help. I would have liked to seen Brown, Nicks, and Evans all playing together at the height of their abilities.
You must lose everything in order to gain anything.-Tyler Durden
I kinda question signing Kreutz-he may be great but I suspect bringing him in has thrown-off the O line’s chemistry…let Tennant start and Kreutz back him-up this season!
How’s that G/T Allen looking? He’d be a great pick-up if he pans-out…also, what about Butler? I’d rather see him signed-over Ingram…
No, Not A Good Idea
As former O-line man and a coach of the position for ten years, I can say you are over reacting just a bit. Though I am not sold on Bushrods ability to play left tackle.
Keep the inside three where they are. You need continuity at the position. You have to know what the person next to you is doing and who he is blocking. That is why you see them pointing and making line calls. Not to mention they are three of the meanest, nastiest people to play their positions.
Bushrod needs a jump rope, so he can improve his foot speed, and hang cleans to simulate popping out of his stance quickly in pass pro. He needs to improve on his technique.
He leans on people instead of moving his feet to keep them in the proper position. I also see him kick and turn his shoulders to soon. He should be kicking back a step or two(depending on drop of QB) and setting up on the DE’s mid line with his outside foot. He should also be punching a lot better to disrupt the forward momentum of the DE. However, when you are slow out of your stance and have to make up for that you tend to turn your shoulders and run at the DE, opening up a short corner to the QB. If the De feels that he will wait until you are off balance and counter back inside.
I would feel better if we picked up a tackle or two after the first cuts are made. I think Black could be an answer as well. Brown is a year away and needs to stay healthy to get the reps needed.
Just my opinion, I’m sure the coaches know what they have and are working on the solution as we speak.
Cool analysis
You should comment more like this.
by GnomeChumpsky on Aug 25, 2011 10:09 PM CDT up reply actions
Let’s just put it this way… it is possible to do this and make it work.
It’s not, however, easy to pull off. You need the right players, the right scheme, and you also need TIME to develop the new line alignment. We might have the first two, not sure on that, but we clearly do NOT have the time at this point.
But it’s still not impossible. True, there are a lot more examples where a crappy tackle moves in to guard and becomes a pretty good guard. But there are ALSO situations in which a great guard has moved out and become a decent tackle (or, more rarely, even a good one).
I suspect that Nicks COULD do it if we were desperate. But I also would rather us just find a decent tackle somewhere. Better yet, I’d prefer somebody already on the roster to shape up enough that we don’t have to go shopping for one.
having a good balance with the running/passing game can help that a lot too
If Pro is the opposite of Con, what is the opposite of Progress? Congress!
-Men's Restroom - House of Representatives, Washington, DC

by 


























