Is Robert Meachem the New Draft Bust?
by AcquiredPanic on Aug 31, 2011 3:36 AM CDT
Email
PrintNow that Reggie is swimming with the fishes we now have an open roster spot for someone to take in the draft bust discussion. I really don't think anyone else can fill this hole better than Robert Meachem. Meachem was drafted with the 27th overall pick (1st round) in the 2007 draft. I did not see this pick coming at all. My initial reaction was one of surprise and disappointment. I really thought the Saints would go defense with this pick and I didn't see any reason to take a wide receiver this high. I wanted a DB or a LB. There were no DB's worth taking with the 27th pick and I thought Paul Posluszny (LB) was the obvious choice. Three receivers were taken ahead of Meachem.....Calvin Johnson, Dwayne Bowe, and Ted Ginn. Two of the three being pro bowlers (I'll let you guess who) and there were two pro bowl receivers taken after Meachem.....Sidney Rice and Steve Smith. I ended up talking myself into liking this pick in the weeks that followed due to his deep threat capability and I thought that overtime it might payoff.....but it hasn't.
Meachem sat out his first year and watched from the bench due to being buried on the depth chart. His stats for the next three seasons are as follows:
Year Team Games Rec Yards Avg Yds/game Long TD
2008 NO 14 12 289 24.1 20.6 74 3
2009 NO 16 45 722 16.0 45.1 54 9
2010 NO 16 44 638 14.5 39.9 55 5
Now these aren't bad stats at all for an average wide receiver. But for a first round pick this just doesn't meet expectations. We could have gotten similar production a lot later in the draft and with our recent success with player evaluation, probably even with an UDFA. Now compare Meachem's career stats to other notable receivers taken AFTER him in the 2007 draft:
Robert Meachem: 101 Receptions-1,649 Yards-17 Touchdowns 1st Rd (27th Overall)
Sydney Rice: 146 Receptions-2,129 Yards-18 Touchdowns 2nd Rd (44th Overall)
Steve Smith: 220 Receptions-2,386 Yards-11 Touchdowns 2nd Rd (51st Overall)
Jacoby Jones: 96 Receptions-1,229 Yards-9 Touchdowns 3rd Rd (73rd Overall)
Mike Simms Walker: 122 Receptions-1,648 Yards-14 Touchdowns 3rd Rd (79th Overall)
Steve Breaston: 187 Receptions-2,528 Yards-7 Touchdowns 5th Rd (142nd Overall)
Chansi Stuckey: 102 Receptions-1,023 Yards-5 Touchdowns 7th Rd (235th Overall)
With all this in mind I just feel like it solidifies him as 1st Rd draft bust. Not because he hasn't performed or that he can't play, but just based on draft position, production, and production of (same position) players drafted after him. I considered Reggie Bush a draft bust considering the same criteria. Robert Meachem has failed to ascend on the depth chart and has had 4 years to achieve that goal. Some might say his stats have suffered from too much depth at WR or that Brees spreads the ball around. But Marques Colston had to battle to become the starting WR from being a 7th Rd pick. He wasn't given the luxury of being a 1st Rd pick but still climbed to the top of the depth chart. Colston has had over 1,000 yards seasons in 4 out of 5 seasons since being drafted. The only down season he had was in 2007 when he missed 5 games due to injury. Don't get me wrong, I like Meachem, I think he is a above average player, has great speed, and is a good fit for the team. Meachem has made big plays in the deep passing game and has had good games but my main memory from him isn't even on the offensive side of the ball. The strip-fumble-touchdown in the very very strange Redskins game in 2009 is my memory of Meachem that sticks out in my mind. (Yes Meachem caught a 53 yard pass at the end of the game but the defensive play is better imo) I hope Meachem finally steps up and pushes for a starting WR spot but I just don't see that happening unless injury occurs. Hopefully this will be his breakout year, but I said that last year, too. I guess you could ask yourself two questions to determine if he is a draft bust. Did we spend a 1st Rd pick on a 4th string receiver? If Payton and Loomis knew then what they know now about his production, would they still draft him?
This FanPost was written by a reader and member of Canal Street Chronicles. It does not necessarily reflect the views of CSC and its staff or editors.
86 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I see where you coming from, but at the same time does our Offense really
allow some one to have a break out year beside the Quarterback. I remember being disapointed a little as well, because I thought we needed more defensive help, but like you I convince myself to like the pick. In all honesty, those late 1st round picks are hit and miss anyways. In my mind, I think Sedrick Ellis could be consider a 1st Rd draft bust. I haven’t been to impressed with him. Those USC players look good in college, but not so good in the pros. Just imagine if we had the dome patrol with today’s offensive and defensive backs. We would be unstoppable. Why can’t we draft a dominating DE and better LB’s?
Meachem is a big play maker and has scored alot when he get’s the ball. And how I loved that Meachem strip in the Skins game. Epic!
That's interesting. You know what makes me sad? YOU DO!!! Maybe we should chug on over to mambypandyland...or maybe we can find some self confidence for you YA JACKWAGON!!!!!!
(tears) Tissue?.....Crybaby.
I think Sedrick Ellis could be consider a 1st Rd draft bust.
Your are right. Someone could probably come up with a convincing argument of why Ellis is more deserving of this title, with him being a top 10 pick.
You must lose everything in order to gain anything.-Tyler Durden
by AcquiredPanic on Aug 31, 2011 2:04 PM CDT up reply actions
Other than the fact that, you know, he’s a starter. And when you bring in two of the best DT’s in the game and they still can’t unseat him, I don’t think “bust” is the right term. I’m going more along the lines of “solid pick”.
Mark Ingram-OROY
Cam Jordan-DROY
New Orleans Saints-2012 Super Bowl Champs
I’m going more along the lines of “solid pick”
Solid pick is good description of Ellis. I was merely stating that someone could probably argue a point of why he isn’t.
You must lose everything in order to gain anything.-Tyler Durden
by AcquiredPanic on Aug 31, 2011 3:15 PM CDT up reply actions
Considering my avatar
You might think I’d try to defend the draft pick. I can’t – mainly because they made a big draft trade to get him. That kind of trading is expected to yield exceptional results. On the other hand, while Ellis started out slow (as nearly all DTs do), he has consistently gotten better every year. He’s had good to very good production and generally that’s what you want. Given the desperate need the Saints had at the time for DT, the big trade makes more sense.
Also, it’s no accident that most of the big runs against the Saints go to the other side of the line from him and Smith. (He does switch left and right some and I usually try to keep track of that. If someone has good evidence that he is at fault more often than not on big runs, I’ll reconsider that statement. One highlight on youtube does not constitute good evidence.)
Too much bias in the draft
I see your point, but the offense scheme has alot to do with Meach’s story. Had we had better performance from the O-line, had the running backs stayed healthy last year, Meachem’s productivity would have been better last year. Because of an off year last year in the O-line and RB injuries, long passes were not as common.
In addition, I think too much is made of draft position. We end up thinking Reggie was a bust and Colston was a steal. The bias carries over into their contracts…Nevermind the undrafted players. It seems to me that the draft position should be forgotten after the first two years as a pro. Maybe such a system already is in place (Lance just got a sweet contract as did PT). Sorry for the rambling, need more coffee.
Things to keep in mind
Meachem missed his entire rookie year with an injury, so career stats are skewed when looking at their careers. A few of the other WRs you mention are playing in an offense that allows them to be the featured receiver. If you put Sydney Rice or Steve Smith in the Saints offense, I think you get the same amount of production. And I disagree when you say he hasn’t climbed up the depth chart. I would argue that he is probably 2nd to Colston right now. Certainly not 4th. And I have no problem spending a very late 1st round pick on a #2 receiver that easily clears 600+ yards a year once he finds his place in the offense.
"I want to hand this trophy to the MVP of the Super Bowl -- and the MVP of the entire league.''
-- Saints coach Sean Payton, handing the Vince Lombardi Trophy to Drew Brees after Super Bowl 44.
But Marques Colston had to battle to become the starting WR from being a 7th Rd pick. He wasn’t given the luxury of being a 1st Rd pick but still climbed to the top of the depth chart.
I have to disagree with you here. Colston basically won his starting job by default. Horn was still on the team at the time and entrenched as a starter. Stallworth, the team’s leading receiver in 2005, had a run in with Payton early on and was traded away for roughly the same compensation we just got out of Reginald, i.e., chump change. Henderson wasn’t stepping up his game any, which has since turned into an annual rice rite of passage and Jamal Jones — remember him? — had actually won the starting job, before pulling a hamstring in the final preseason game that year. Don’t get me wrong. I give Colston all the credit in the world, for taking the reigns and not looking back once he reached the top of the mountain. I just don’t think he did much “climbing”, i.e., overcoming stiff competition in order to get to that point. I do agree that Meachem should have accomplished more than he has by this point, though. If reports about Colston’s two bum knees are true, perhaps this will be his breakout year. If not, we can always use the tried and false decoy excuse, in order to buy our bust more time to prove himself.
You can toga party, but you can't toga fish.
Well you’re part right. The job was somewhat handed to him by default.
On the other hand, you apparently forget why his jersey number is in the range usually reserved for a QB. He came to that first minicamp out of shape and flat out sucked. He was given every reason to expect to be cut, but he dug in, busted his balls, and became somebody SP could count on quickly enough that SP felt he was able to ditch Stallworth after their little run-in, because he knew he had Jones available (then) at #2 and Colston available at #3.
Well, you’re part right. I didn’t forget that. Colston was projected as a TE when he was drafted. Henderson was #3 on the depth chart going in and remained there. After Jones went down, Colston ultimately held off Henderson and Copper, a journeyman wideout who had followed Payton over from Dallas, for the starting spot. His size is the primary reason for that. He remained healthy, while Horn continued to nurse injuries from week to week, thereby making him the team’s leading receiver as a rookie based on reps alone. It was Horn’s demise that ultimately led to their drafting Meachem the following year.
You can toga party, but you can't toga fish.
Meachem did not determine his draft position, Payloo did. They overvalued him, no question. But Meachem is not a bust, he’s doing what he’s supposed to do if you ignore his draft position.
Deal me another hand Lord, this one's very hard
if you ignore his draft position.
His draft position is the topic of this post.
They overvalued him, no question. But Meachem is not a bustSounds like a bust to me if you dont ignore his draft position.
This comment was written by a reader and member of Canal Street Chronicles. It does not necessarily reflect the views of CSC and its staff or editors.
Ok. So what is the point of your FanPost since there is no other logical conclusion? To crucify Robert Meachem? And you call yourself a Saints fan. For shame.
Deal me another hand Lord, this one's very hard
So what is the point ofyourFanPost
It’s not my FanPost. Does someone email you my comments? I thought I was blocked.
If Payton and Loomis knew then what they know now about his production, would they still draft him?^^^^This should answer your question.
And you call yourself a Saints fan.Do I? I’m sure it’s assumed but I dont claim anything other than my love for CSC. WHO DAT!
This comment was written by a reader and member of Canal Street Chronicles. It does not necessarily reflect the views of CSC and its staff or editors.
Now you have me and PJGJ confused. I don’t go anywhere near the stink eye.
This comment was written by a reader and member of Canal Street Chronicles. It does not necessarily reflect the views of CSC and its staff or editors.
I’m realising that a lot of people wont understand this unless they were privy enough to see “the thread.”
This comment was written by a reader and member of Canal Street Chronicles. It does not necessarily reflect the views of CSC and its staff or editors.
I was fortunate (or unfortunate) to be up late with insominia and read “the thread” before it was deleted. I laughed my @ss off!
"I will go to my car, get my teeth out the glove box and come back and bite you".
by saintscorpio on Aug 31, 2011 9:09 PM CDT up reply actions
I also stumbled into that thread in the wee hours of the morning. Hilarious. It will be forever burned into my brain.
by snowboard_kat on Aug 31, 2011 9:19 PM CDT up reply actions
I cant believe you two haven’t blocked me yet. I feel special.
This comment was written by a reader and member of Canal Street Chronicles. It does not necessarily reflect the views of CSC and its staff or editors.
stop living off our past
lets make new memories once were out of the dog house with THE DAVE
Ugh. I thought the question was about the Saints. The Bucs were 10-6. Sorry about that.
You can toga party, but you can't toga fish.
by coldpizza on Aug 18, 2011 7:42 AM CDT
hmmm
csc might not be here but we are. wanna talk trash and keep the edit ninjas busy in the morning? cuz the game tonight was tore up from the floor up
Ugh. I thought the question was about the Saints. The Bucs were 10-6. Sorry about that.
You can toga party, but you can't toga fish.
by coldpizza on Aug 18, 2011 7:42 AM CDT
the game tonight was tore up from the floor up
fo shizzy …yeah, we could have talked some trash, though I’m not sure we would have topped that last thread that needed ninja editing…
(I wonder if Dave saves all the “stuff” he edits out…hmm)
by snowboard_kat on Sep 2, 2011 7:50 AM CDT up reply actions
The man sells t-shirts. He doesn’t throw s*** away.
This comment was written by a reader and member of Canal Street Chronicles. It does not necessarily reflect the views of CSC and its staff or editors.
LOL.
what do you think he does with them?
by snowboard_kat on Sep 2, 2011 8:04 AM CDT up reply actions
Late nights when Erin wont let him get any…….sleep he stays up, reads them and wonders what the hell happened to this site.
This comment was written by a reader and member of Canal Street Chronicles. It does not necessarily reflect the views of CSC and its staff or editors.
LOL…definitely the makings of a good book.
…maybe ‘When Inmates Run the Asylum’ as a working title.
by snowboard_kat on Sep 2, 2011 8:22 AM CDT up reply actions
LOL
In Breesus' name we play
by Breesus Christ Superstar on Aug 31, 2011 6:19 PM CDT up reply actions
Keep your powder dry to the end of the season
Contract year…. make or break for #17
He will see a ton of reps this year because Colston is banged up. Up to him now…
Bring the metal....
Career wise, I would like to bring up the question of how many Super Bowls those other players have won? How many playoff games have they won?
From a financial standpoint, how much are each of those players getting paid? Are they a “value” to the team or the organization?
I don’t know about you, but I am curious to know what kind of locker room presence Meachem has compared to those other players.
If you want to be short sided in the analysis of a player or maybe you just need a scape goat or whipping boy, then keep talking…otherwise lets try to remember that a valuable player on a TEAM has many more points to consider than just numbers.
Duh!
Welcome to CSC. Thank you for your contribution. Someone will be along shortly to poke holes in everything you just said. Is that the Gorillaz in your profile pic?
This comment was written by a reader and member of Canal Street Chronicles. It does not necessarily reflect the views of CSC and its staff or editors.
Poke away. At no point did I say I’m am always correct… Besides this topic like many has no black or white( or in this case, black or gold answer). I just would not want to short a player based on arbitrary numbers that someone somewhere may value without trying to see from all angles
Thanks for the welcome and yes that is a gorillaz avatar.
Duh!
by devilducky on Aug 31, 2011 12:41 PM CDT via mobile up reply actions
Someone will be along shortly to poke holes in everything you just said.
Lmao, I found this out rather quickly. I think “live fire exercise”could be a good comparison.
You must lose everything in order to gain anything.-Tyler Durden
by AcquiredPanic on Aug 31, 2011 2:46 PM CDT up reply actions
Former Army here, so forum chat in one of my favorite sites, with my favorite team, with like minded fans (and with even a few failcan’t haters) is much easier than live fire.
Duh!
by devilducky on Aug 31, 2011 3:00 PM CDT via mobile up reply actions
Is there any important reason that we need to label somebody a "draft bust?"
what value is there in doing this. He’s got over 100 receptions, over 1600 yds, 17 TDs , at least one long TD each season. If we wern’t loaded with receivers, is there any question he would have bigger numbers?
Why work to label him something like that? perhaps if he got cut- or if he was like like that 1st Jonathan Sullivan guy, it would be warranted. But here’s a guy that played in all 16 games during the SB year and contributed – I don’t see any reason to knock him down. For me, I’m cheering him on and hoping for a monster season from him.
If Pro is the opposite of Con, what is the opposite of Progress? Congress!
-Men's Restroom - House of Representatives, Washington, DC
by Philinwood on Aug 31, 2011 11:00 AM CDT reply actions 3 recs
If we wern’t loaded with receivers, is there any question he would have bigger numbers?
Yes he would have bigger numbers but he has had time to wrestle playing time away from players ahead of him. Drafting him in the 1st Rd, he was supposed to be our receiver of the future. Instead he has been outplayed by Colston (7th Rd Pk) and Moore (UDFA). If he wasn’t a first rounder there would be no problem with his production. But you don’t take a player in the first round for depth, you take them to be your future starter. You can find depth and contributors later in the draft.
You must lose everything in order to gain anything.-Tyler Durden
by AcquiredPanic on Aug 31, 2011 2:38 PM CDT up reply actions
I know I haven’t had the opportunity to draft anyone…ever… But I would hope every pick contributed to a championship season or two. Meachem, along with many others have done this. My opinion is that if you have or had a championship season then there is no “bust”
Duh!
by devilducky on Aug 31, 2011 3:05 PM CDT via mobile up reply actions
Rec'd
Monster season and I’ll change my screen name. No, not really. I wish I hadn’t been so crazy as to name it on a player. Players come and go.
"I am a Saints player. Look, sir" Patrick Robinson
by CrazyforColston on Sep 1, 2011 11:18 AM CDT up reply actions
what's the info on Colston being banged up? I wasn't aware.
If Pro is the opposite of Con, what is the opposite of Progress? Congress!
-Men's Restroom - House of Representatives, Washington, DC
I didn’t know that either.
This comment was written by a reader and member of Canal Street Chronicles. It does not necessarily reflect the views of CSC and its staff or editors.
That’s the way Payton likes it.
It’s been all over Rotoworld.com since January 24th.
After visiting Saints camp this week, SI’s Peter King came away “worried” about Marques Colston’s knees. Colston has practiced consistently since his early-camp setback, so King’s concern is a bit eye-opening. It’s possible King did digging within the Saints’ organization and front-office folks or coaches were worried about the surgically repaired knees. Or perhaps King saw Colston struggling on the practice field. Or maybe it’s pure speculation. Whatever the case, Colston remains on our medical red-flag list for 2011 fantasy drafts.
Source: Peter King on Twitter
Aug 25
Deal me another hand Lord, this one's very hard
"Or maybe it's pure speculation."
Or maybe it’s just Peter King being Peter King.
Maybe his concern about Colston is the reason he speculates the Falcons will defeat the Chargers 24-21 in the Super Bowl.
"Worried"
is a reporter’s trick to get credit for a non-prediction if it turns out to be true, and pass it off as a non-prediction if it turns out to be false. It’s just King being his typical malpracticing self.
It was good while it lasted.
Anybody that plays on the Saints is going to be PERCEIVED as a bust or someone not living up to the hype due to the fact that the Saints spread the wealth around and no one player is gonna get a chance to ball it up.
Haters gon' hate...
no one player is gonna get a chance to ball it up
Yeah, but Colston has 4 seasons over 1,000 yards
You must lose everything in order to gain anything.-Tyler Durden
by AcquiredPanic on Aug 31, 2011 3:35 PM CDT up reply actions
True but he's still not considered a star by his peers...
I mean ball it up as in a dangerous threat type ball in up. Not saying he’s not dope, just mean no one is going to break any records or anything in this offense—and that’s fine.
Haters gon' hate...
no one is going to break any records or anything in this offense
Drew Brees would like to have a word with you.
This comment was written by a reader and member of Canal Street Chronicles. It does not necessarily reflect the views of CSC and its staff or editors.
Slightly off-topic question for you guys
Some of you might remember me as Patriotguy2, or patriotguy…. er.. anyways:
I drafted Marques Colston. I’d like to know what I exactly expect out of him. I was thinking he would be Bree’s favorite target, but I also know he spreads the ball around. What kind of season would I expect of him? You think he’ll be better this year, or worse? About the same?
I’ll take 11 players with heart on the field over 11 guys with just talent. Talent is fleeting, it goes away over time. Heart is what drives you to be better. To push yourself beyond what you think your capabilities are. To show us that when you strive, all things are possible.- SMP
Around 800-950 yards receiving with less than 9 TD’s. That’s as exact as I can get. How many times have you been banned from different sites? I assume that’s why you have had so many user names.
This comment was written by a reader and member of Canal Street Chronicles. It does not necessarily reflect the views of CSC and its staff or editors.
No... actually because I am also a raiders fan
and my raider brethren wanted me to have a newer username. lol
I’ll take 11 players with heart on the field over 11 guys with just talent. Talent is fleeting, it goes away over time. Heart is what drives you to be better. To push yourself beyond what you think your capabilities are. To show us that when you strive, all things are possible.- SMP
and around that? that would be worse than last year. Why? D=
I’ll take 11 players with heart on the field over 11 guys with just talent. Talent is fleeting, it goes away over time. Heart is what drives you to be better. To push yourself beyond what you think your capabilities are. To show us that when you strive, all things are possible.- SMP
No reason to the rhyme. I just threw some numbers out there based on a gut feeling. Last time I had a gut feeling it got a little messy. Good luck with the pick
This comment was written by a reader and member of Canal Street Chronicles. It does not necessarily reflect the views of CSC and its staff or editors.
Oh ok. Well thats fine. Im sticking with him anyways.
And thanks. I was just unsure what he would do in a diverse offense. lol
I’ll take 11 players with heart on the field over 11 guys with just talent. Talent is fleeting, it goes away over time. Heart is what drives you to be better. To push yourself beyond what you think your capabilities are. To show us that when you strive, all things are possible.- SMP
I took Colston in last year and the year before...
Most games he got me around 10-12 points with the occasional 20 pointer but it depends on your scoring system. He’s more of a possession receiver so don’t expect too much from him point wise.
Haters gon' hate...
sounds good. he is my #2 guy, so im hopng he would get me at least 9+ points.
I’ll take 11 players with heart on the field over 11 guys with just talent. Talent is fleeting, it goes away over time. Heart is what drives you to be better. To push yourself beyond what you think your capabilities are. To show us that when you strive, all things are possible.- SMP
Meachem will poach 5 of those 9. And we haven’t even talked about Little Jimmy.
Deal me another hand Lord, this one's very hard
Immy is gonna be the one if you ask me...
That dude is gonna be the talk of star TE’s this year watch!
Haters gon' hate...
I don't understand
Your thoughts are he’s a bust because he has the 2nd most tds which is real the biggest stat there. He’s 4th in yards out of those players on an offense that spreads the ball around a hell of a lot more then any team the other player are on. Your comparing him to colston which your argument is he was a 7th rounder which I think everyone knows what a complete steal and should have been a 1st rounder if the draft was perfect. Hell the guy was ranked 53 by the players. The guy is doing his job and doing it pretty well I have to say. He is getting a td every 6 catches! Why would u make a ridiculous post like this.
You act like I said Meachem sucked and should be cut.....thats not the case
I gave Meachem plenty plenty of good comments in the post. I stated that I like Meachem and he was a good fit for the team. I’m about to repeat myself but we drafted Meachem to be our future at WR. You do not take a player in the first round to add depth. You do not draft a first rounder to be a contributor. You draft a first rounder to be a starter. Has he ascended to the ranks of being a starter? No. Has he gotten in arms reach of 1,000 yard season. No. Has Payton said "Damn Meachem looks better than Colston and Moore……lets put him in? No.
Your thoughts are he’s a bust because he has the 2nd most tds
No, my thoughts are he is averaging 40 receptions and 600 yards a season. How many first round WR’s average this who are going into their fifth season?
He’s 4th in yards out of those players on an offense that spreads the ball around a hell of a lot more then any team the other player are on.
If this spreading the ball theory is such a big factor in Meachem not producing then how does Colston manage to put up 1,000 yards seasons every year?
he was a 7th rounder which I think everyone knows what a complete steal and should have been a 1st rounder if
So you are saying Colston’s numbers are first round stats? Then how can you defend Meachem for being a first rounder? His stats resemble a 3rd or 4th string receiver.
The guy is doing his job and doing it pretty well I have to say.
If by catching long balls, yeah he has done pretty good. But he was supposed to be a STARTER.
Why would u make a ridiculous post like this.
So you would come here and tell me how ridiculous it is of course.
You must lose everything in order to gain anything.-Tyler Durden
by AcquiredPanic on Sep 1, 2011 12:43 AM CDT up reply actions
Wr are known for taking long to develop.
He was brought in to be a deep threat he was never known for his rought ability in college. he is going into his 4th season because he never played his rookie season so doesn’t really count. He was hurt last season so don’t blame him for a decline and the lack of a run game didn’t help. Dude posted 722 yards in his second season that’s really not bad. And to say he isn’t a starter well in a sence none of the wr are starters because they play equal and dif roles in the offense. Colson gets more yards because he runs good routs and has a more extensive rout tree. watching meach in the past year i have seen his rout tree grow so I expect to see his catches and yards go up. Sorry I didn’t mean to make it out like I was attacking my bad. We are all saints fans here and I want this to be a friendly discussion my bad new to the posting world and haven’t got it so I don’t sound rude.
Yeah in retrospect shouldn’t have said the last part on my first post had been drinking sorry. It is a subject I have often thought about and I’m glad u put it out there to talk about.
shouldn’t have said the last part on my first post had been drinking sorry.
No need to apologize, my friend. I don’t even look at my text messages on my phone after a night of drinking. Drunk texting is my worst enemy and a horribly bad habit that I can’t seem to shake, lol.
You must lose everything in order to gain anything.-Tyler Durden
by AcquiredPanic on Sep 1, 2011 3:16 AM CDT up reply actions
…that would make for an interesting blog…post your drunk texts and drunk tweets..all spin offs of the original- drunk dialing (not to be confused with drunk driving of course).
JND where are you and your merlot?
by snowboard_kat on Sep 1, 2011 4:05 AM CDT up reply actions
and let’s not forget about my personal favorite, drunk emailing (you know what I’m talking about coldpizza).
by snowboard_kat on Sep 1, 2011 4:09 AM CDT up reply actions
that would definitely be interesting
Idk if one blog could hold all the stupidity contained in my drunk text folders. I got one folder for drunk text to old girlfriends. Got a second folder for talking sh_t to people I got a problem with…….i don’t mind those too much. There is nothing better than waking someone up at 3 in the morning and screaming f__k u!! LoL
You must lose everything in order to gain anything.-Tyler Durden
by AcquiredPanic on Sep 1, 2011 4:52 PM CDT up reply actions
The biggest stat on that list
Is the 17 TDs. He’s scored 17 TDs while missing his entire rookie season due to injury. He had a “breakout” season in 2009, scoring 9 TDs with over 700 yards receiving (nothing to sneeze at considering how Drew spreads the ball around). Remember, Lance Moore was banged up in 2009, helping Meachem get more looks.
Peyton, I can eat Oreos faster than you!!!!
Comments For This Post Are Closed
Secondary Sidebar
User Tools
Related FanPosts on Canal Street Chronicles
FanPosts
Community blog posts and discussion.
Recent FanPosts
In Association With
Shutdown Corner - NFL - Yahoo! Sports
- Detroit Lions DT Nick Fairley arrested again; now has more NFL arrests than NFL sacks
- Former high-school star Brian Banks does serious time on trumped-up charge, now hopes for an NFL shot
- Former ‘idiot kicker’ Mike Vanderjagt in trouble after accosting junior-high heckler
- Adrian Peterson blows teammates away in footraces; appears to be on the mend
- UPDATE: Charlie Sheen didn’t buy Lawrence Taylor’s Super Bowl ring
