Bears 13 @ Saints 30: A Review of HansDat's 'Hot Reads'
With the second game under their belts now and a 2011 victory skin hanging on the wall, it's time to look at my 'Hot Reads' and see how they turned out.
Make the jump for an analytical review of my 'Hot Reads' from the Bears game.
Primary Option: Protect Brees
What I'd like to see: Drew Brees hardly touched by the Chicago Bear defense, with plenty of time to survey the field and pick apart the secondary.
Ask, and ye shall receive. Brees was only hit twice and sacked once by the Bears defense, on his way to a stellar performance with very few mistakes (to borrow from French Freak's gameday comment). And the one sack they recorded was not very impactful - it came on second down in the first quarter, and then on the very next play, Drew hit Devery Henderson on that sweet 79-yard touchdown.
I'll go ahead and say the protection was very good, and played a large role in this victory. If the Protectors of Brees can keep this up, the offense should keep posting big points every week.
Checkdown # 1: Better Tackling
What I'd like to see: Crisp, clean, textbook-form immediate tackling by Saint defenders who are always close to the ball, thereby limiting the big plays from the Bears. Bonus Side Note: if the Saints special teams tackle poorly and give up another touchdown, the Saints will lose.
Tackling was a bit better than in the opener, but it still left much to be desired, and this will continue to be an area to work on, as a better offensive team will make the Saints pay more than the Bears did.
As I scanned the play-by-play, I noticed a lot of yards gained after the catch by Matt Forte and some of the other Bears receivers. The two biggest-gaining plays were the 42-yard Forte run, and a 30-yard catch by Johnny Knox, and both of those occurred on Bears scoring drives.
But, overall the defense did well to limit the Bears big plays, and they did not allow ANY big scoring plays at all, which contributed significantly to the win.
Note on the Bonus Side Note: Kudos to the special teams - Morstead and the coverage guys - for taking Devin Hester and the Bears return game completely out of the picture - NEUTRALIZED, it was.
Checkdown # 2: Red Zone Inefficiency
What I'd like to see: If you saw my comment in Friday's Game Predictions thread, you know I called for a 66% or better red zone TD rate, and I'm sticking with that.
The Saints didn't quite reach my goal of 66% Red Zone TDs, but they did improve upon the abysmal 20% (1 of 5) from the first game to a 50% conversion rate on Sunday (2 of 4). Also, looking at a first half/second half breakdown of them shows just how important they are.
In the first half, the Saints were 0-2 in the red zone, coming away with two Kasay field goals, and the Bears were right there, only trailing at the half by six, 16-10.
But in the second half, Brees and Co. converted TDs on both trips into the red zone, and outscored the Bears 14-3 to put the game away.
While they did better than last week, and did enough to win today, I still think that the Saints need to hit touchdowns on 66% of their red zone trips, especially while the defense continues to hone the craft of tackling.
Safety Valve: Dome Inhospitality
I'm not talking about rudeness, insulting, hurtful, or dangerous actions against the Bears or their fans. They just need to know that they are in Who Dat Country, where offensive Bears are not allowed to hear themselves think. Not on first down, not on second down, and definitely not on third down, especially third and long.
What I'd like to see: Vintage Aaron Brooks (who, while putting up good QB stats, often had trouble running a crisp offense) - false starts, delays of game, and timeouts burned well before the end of the half and game.
Well done, Saints fans!! Seems to me you really did your job on Sunday. Dave was hoarse for the post-game podcast, and I imagine most of the fans left the game the same way. I heard roaring early and often, and I think it helped the Saints directly (interfering with the Bears players' ability to communicate with each other and fire off the line at the snap) and indirectly (pumping up the Saints defense)
I used to love leaving a Saints game with almost no voice and talk-shouting with and high-fiving other happy hoarse Saints fans on the concourses and around the Dome, so I hope you had that experience as well.
Jay Cutler and the Bears had to burn two timeouts in the first quarter, ON THE SAME DRIVE. I know they ended up scoring a touchdown on that drive (defensive penalties - GAAAAA!!!), but I believe the seeds were planted then that led to me observing quite a few Cutler-tantrums on the sideline throughout the game (thrown towels, shaken heads, looks of dismay and bewilderment, animated discussions with coaches/players).
There weren't too many penalties on the Bears, but late in the game, they came in bunches to thwart any thought the Bears had of making the game close, or even getting one cheap touchdown at the end - three false starts in the fourth quarter by the Bears, which I'd say were due to a combination of the crowd noise and the relentless pressure brought to bear on the Bears by Gregg Williams and the Saint defense.
* * *
There you go, CSCers. Now let me know what you think of the analysis...did I miss any aspects of those aspects in the game? Do you agree with my assessments and observations?
21 comments
|
1 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
about your checkdown 1..
some of the missed tackles came on the dump-off passes to forte that left most defenders out of the play, maybe committing too many people to the QB pressure.. it’s the risk you run with an aggressive defense.. overall the hits on receivers were good the pursue was adequate, except for the 42 yard run..
yes, you're right
WIN NOW
WINGRAMANIA!!!!
by Hans Petersen on Sep 21, 2011 8:01 AM CDT up reply actions
Vilma was nearby a couple times to tackle Forte.....
but Forte ran right by him without effort. Our linebackers are weak. On the flip side, whenever we dumped the ball off to one of our running backs, the chicago linebacker (usually urlacher) made the tackle immediately.
Our fat punk kicker, Garrett Hartley, missed a game-winner and we lost for the second week in a row - Scott Fujita in 2009
by Ragin Who Dat on Sep 21, 2011 9:57 AM CDT up reply actions
Checkdown # 1: Better Tackling
Is it just me or does it seem like in some cases we are trying to strip the ball, and thus missing the tackle? I think I saw 2-3 attempted strips by players who could have wrapped up their target instead.
and I think this is true, too
if all the players would use the proper tackling technique, they’d give up less yards after the catch, and therefore less big plays.
first man to the ball carrier should wrap-up and try to bring him down, while 2nd and 3rd arrivers should go for the ball when they get there…
WIN NOW
WINGRAMANIA!!!!
by Hans Petersen on Sep 21, 2011 8:03 AM CDT up reply actions
a 2011 victory skin hanging on the wall,
GAA!!! It’s week 2!! Ok, never mind.
I'm so tired of being lonely, I still have some love to give
Won't you show me that you really care?
Better than
The Wichita Eagle
INGRAMANIA equals LOMBARDI 2012
by cajuncommando58 on Sep 21, 2011 10:57 AM CDT up reply actions
I won't even point out
that we’re actually 1-2 in 2011 (including the playoff loss)
WIN NOW
WINGRAMANIA!!!!
by Hans Petersen on Sep 21, 2011 7:19 PM CDT up reply actions
I know
not helping
WIN NOW
WINGRAMANIA!!!!
by Hans Petersen on Sep 21, 2011 7:20 PM CDT up reply actions
I think my point about the running game, and how that ties in with protecting Drew turned out just as I thought. The Saints ran 11 passing plays and 4 running plays in the first quarter. Result? Settling for a field goal and giving up a sack. The worst was the field goal.
1-10-CHI 23 (1:46) 9-D.Brees pass short right to 16-L.Moore to CHI 17 for 6 yards (26-T.Jennings). Pass 5, YAC 1
2-4-CHI 17 (1:11) (Shotgun) 9-D.Brees pass short right to 43-D.Sproles to CHI 14 for 3 yards (55-L.Briggs). Pass 3, YAC 0
3-1-CHI 14 (:31) 9-D.Brees pass incomplete short right to 80-J.Graham.
4-1-CHI 14 (:25) 2-J.Kasay 31 yard field goal is GOOD
2nd & 4 in the red zone, and you go shotgun? smh
3rd & 1 and another pass?? fml
Tackling will always be key...
Although NO team in the NFL tackles 100% of their opponents with the first attempt, some do better than others. When you saw the Saints in preseason and the game against GB, we were horrendous. Our CBs & Safties give up too much room/cushion before the ball is snapped. We did a MUCH better job getting up closer against the Bears which resulted in Cutler holding the ball longer than he want to and we were able to rack up sacks. If our secondary would’ve gave that 5-7-10 yard cushion like in the GB game, we probably would’ve lost that game too. The tackling will get better as the season goes on but we just gotta hope that the tackles our defenders miss, it won’t be for a big gain. Some will but hopefully most won’t.
Bears receivers <<< Green Bay receivers
In all honesty, I think NO was able to double-team the two remaining Bears receivers, none of whom are as good as the #4 Pack receiver. Lets face it, the Pack receivers are great, and able to juke just about anyone out of their jock straps, hence the extra distance.
I loved how Olin Kreutz is helping the running backs up every running play I saw. And no, it’s not because I think it’s good that he’s being a good guy and a team player, but rather that our center is always paving way for our running backs and he’s right there with them from the moment their at the line to when they get tackles or score a TD…which I don’t know if I ever really saw in the recent past with Goodwin. (this also might be because Kreutz is the only 300 lbs Hawaiian guy on the field and is easier to spot…but either way I’m lovin it)
"I have something no one else has: my brain. Which I use to my advantage, when advantageous."
by GRlZZ on Sep 21, 2011 10:45 AM CDT reply actions 1 recs
I think
The timing between him and Drew was a lot better this game along with the snaps.
INGRAMANIA equals LOMBARDI 2012
by cajuncommando58 on Sep 21, 2011 10:54 AM CDT up reply actions
Tackling...
I do think the best play from Jenkins was is covragr on Forte’s big run. Textbook.
Malcolm Jenkins. 2011 Pro Bowler. List!
Repeat? Under construction...

by 


























