Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Ryder Hesjedal Wins Giro d'Italia

In Defense of Roman Harper and Gregg Williams

I understand we're all frustrated and upset following the Saints' emotional 36-32 loss to the San Francisco 49ers yesterday; that's only natural. But some of the talk I'm hearing from supposed Saints fans is just a tad ridiculous. I'm talking about those fans who think both Roman Harper and Gregg Williams should take a hike. Are you people serious?

I'd like to go over some quick stats for a second, just so we're all on the same page here. Roman Harper tied for a team high eight tackles, had 1.5 sacks, forced a fumble, rushed the quarterback at least once more and batted a ball down at the line of scrimmage. Just so we're clear: that's the guy you want to blame for this loss? That makes complete sense, those are some pathetic stats.

Star-divide

Oh, you probably think Harper was the safety getting burned by Vernon Davis on two key plays at the end of the game, don't you? No, you're just having 2010 Seattle flashbacks. This year it was Malcolm Jenkins getting schooled (playing cornerback?), our new summer-long scapegoat. High five! You might remember him from such plays as:

Imag0567_medium

Imag0566_medium

Ouch. Good luck getting those images off the back of your eyelids for the next few months as you first close your eyes and try to sleep at night. Did Harper get out-muscled on game-winning Vernon Davis catch? Yeah, it wasn't his shining moment and the coverage was weak. But he's certainly not deserving of complete scorn.

And while I'm defending people like it's my job, I've got to stick up for Gregg Williams as well. Where the **** did all of this Gregg Williams hate come from all of a sudden. I've never seen so many people turn on a coach that quickly since this past Monday's BCS game.

Look, I'm a bit baffled by the defensive play calling on the final two series' of the game, too. What the hell was that? We'll have to examine that later. But I'm not calling for the man's head on a platter. After all, it was his defense that shut the 49ers down in the middle of the game and allowed the Saints to come back from a 17 point deficit, despite turning the ball over five times. FIVE TIMES! AND THEY STILL HAD A CHANCE TO WIN!

If anything, Williams deserves a hard pat on the back for keeping the Saints alive in this one. He's not a freakin' miracle worker. Payton's offense crapped the bed when it came to ball security; it was up to Williams to clean it all up like it never happened. And do I need to remind everyone how incredibly crucial he was in the Saints first championship? Have we forgotten that? Doesn't he at least deserve a little more of respect?

Let's just take a few days to cool off before we start saying something stupid we're going to regret. Believe me, I understand how you feel. But let's not misplace our anger. Gregg Williams and Roman Harper do not deserve it.

Comment 199 comments  |  3 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

More from Canal Street Chronicles

Comments

Display:

This was almost the same situation as the Falcons game earlier this year, in ATL.

We were up 3, and the Falcons started on their own 10 (I think). Gregg started calling blitzes and Harry Douglas became Jerry Rice. Luckily for us, the Falcons settled for a FG and we went to OT. They could’ve gotten a touchdown and finished the game (like the 49ers did). You’d have thought that Gregg would’ve learnt his lesson from that game lol, guess not. This is why it’s so upsetting, because we’ve been in this situation before, yet the outcome is still the same.

This is why I’m happy Williams is leaving, he’s too cocky and hard-headed

Taylor Gang or wear a #6 Miami Heat Jersey in Cleveland

by AKAY47 on Jan 15, 2012 10:39 AM CST reply actions   1 recs

The best gameplan Gregg Williams has had in 2 weeks

Is the one he helped Alabama formulate for the BCS title game. Crap last week, worst this week. San Fran had ONE pass-catcher that realistically the Saints had to worry about at the end of the game and they left hm one-on-one.

Writer (and a handsome one at that),
And the Valley Shook

by Billy Gomila on Jan 15, 2012 10:40 AM CST reply actions  

exactly

that is what makes this inexcusable.

by jray2000 on Jan 15, 2012 10:54 AM CST up reply actions  

And last week

He looked completely mystified by Detroit for simply moving Calvin Johnson into the slot. Completely unprepared for the playoffs.

Writer (and a handsome one at that),
And the Valley Shook

by Billy Gomila on Jan 15, 2012 11:16 AM CST up reply actions  

Agree with everything you said here

The D did an incredible job keeping the Saints in the game considering the 5 turnovers. On another note, it looks like Greg Williams is going to leave, ESPN has a story up on it already. They mentioned Steve Spagnuolo and Mike Nolan as the short list for candidates.

by shipgoalie05 on Jan 15, 2012 10:41 AM CST reply actions  

Williams should take some blame

I have no issues with Roman Harper. He really improved this season and played a great game.

The defense actually did well for most of the game and definitely kept the Saints in it. They just failed when it counted on two separate drives. With the game on the line you can’t have a deep ball to Vernon Davis, that’s unforgivable. It’s on Williams for either not putting the right personnel out there or having the right coverage. There’s a time you blitz and a time you don’t.

by Swidub on Jan 15, 2012 10:42 AM CST reply actions  

Hard to blame the defense when the offense and special teams spotted the 49ers 17 points

Just because we have chiseled abs and stunning features, it doesn't mean that we too can't not die in a freak gasoline fight accident.

by Fat Punk Kicker on Jan 15, 2012 10:42 AM CST reply actions  

because...

players fumble, coaches call bad plays

"I don’t believe you are a true fan unless you are upset when they lose." -Me

by asaint on Jan 15, 2012 12:37 PM CST up reply actions  

There is a time and a place for everything. I champion the Saints’ aggressiveness but this was neither the time nor the place. Situational football dictates smart, conservative play. You don’t throw bombs or run bubble screens when protecting a late lead, and you don’t blitz in this situation and leave a Pro Bowl tight end like Davis in single coverage on your safety.

from nola.com.. I think this pretty much explains everything

Taylor Gang or wear a #6 Miami Heat Jersey in Cleveland

by AKAY47 on Jan 15, 2012 10:45 AM CST reply actions  

that's Jeff Duncan's morning-after column
You don’t throw bombs or run bubble screens when protecting a late lead

Sean Payton did and does…

you don’t blitz in this situation and leave a Pro Bowl tight end like Davis in single coverage on your safety.

Gregg Williams did and does…

So, you have to take the good with the bad, or get rid of the guy. Wonder how Pay-loo feel about this?

Having the ball is better than not having the ball. And if you punt,
not only does it mean you don't have the ball anymore—
it means you didn't score, which sucks.

by Hans Petersen on Jan 15, 2012 11:22 AM CST up reply actions  

Payton is known for usually thinking it was a good play-call, but just not executed well

wonder if that’s the case here…

Having the ball is better than not having the ball. And if you punt,
not only does it mean you don't have the ball anymore—
it means you didn't score, which sucks.

by Hans Petersen on Jan 15, 2012 11:23 AM CST up reply actions  

This!

Well played Hans. I agree. Dance with the one who brought you.

Wanna say something? Sign up! It's free!

by Dave Cariello on Jan 15, 2012 12:23 PM CST up reply actions  

Did Harper get out-muscled on game-winning Vernon Davis catch? Yeah, it wasn’t his shining moment and the coverage was weak. But he’s certainly not deserving of complete scorn.

That last catch looked as much, if not more, on the responsibilty on Scott Shanle….. just sayin’

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qais_eGMnWk
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=39GH-nzrY_I&feature=relatde

by tlsk1066 on Jan 15, 2012 10:50 AM CST reply actions  

I noticed that is well, I saw that if he was maybe a few steps back or over he could have picked it off

by Travis Dauro on Jan 15, 2012 10:52 AM CST up reply actions  

By now, everybody on this team should know better

Than to put Shanle on VERNON FRICKIN’ DAVIS.

Writer (and a handsome one at that),
And the Valley Shook

by Billy Gomila on Jan 15, 2012 11:17 AM CST up reply actions   1 recs

San Fran interview said it was the defense

Film study showed that Harper plays behind the receiver in the end zone so that’s why they called that play. Shouldn’t Williams be just as aware of tendencies? Surely they knew a touchdown ends it for us. That’s my beef against Williams, he doesn’t change for the situation.

Bear

by bearsaint on Jan 15, 2012 2:33 PM CST up reply actions  

His gameplanning this postseason has been complete crap. Period.

It was awful against Detroit and the offense overcame. He seemed to learn that this team has no pass-rush without blitzes, but instead chose to leave the only real threat SF had in their passing game singled when you absolutely could not afford a big play.

There is zero reason to bring him back.

Writer (and a handsome one at that),
And the Valley Shook

by Billy Gomila on Jan 15, 2012 3:48 PM CST up reply actions  

Why didn’t we just mug every receiver on that play? If PI is called, then SF has to kick the FG. I would have just told everybody to tackle all the players going out for passes at the line.

by BlackandGold4ever on Jan 16, 2012 6:37 AM CST up reply actions  

Agree in some instances

I agree in a few ways Dave. But the thing that gets me, is that the defense and offense completely flip flopped in the game. The offense went from cautious to explosive and the defense went from shutdown to laxed. I don’t have any blame for Harper, to me he was the Defense’s MVP this year. He lead the team in sacks as a safety, that is un-heard of. I blame Gregg Williams’s defensive strategy at the end. With 40 seconds left in the game, why would you rush 6? That completely threw Jenkins under the bus and forced him to cover Davis perfect. Instead rush 3 and force the offense to throw underneath. The couple plays before they did that and it worked! I just don’t understand GW’s method at the end.

by Travis Dauro on Jan 15, 2012 10:51 AM CST reply actions  

he thought he'd catch them off-guard

taking calculated risks that might payoff

Having the ball is better than not having the ball. And if you punt,
not only does it mean you don't have the ball anymore—
it means you didn't score, which sucks.

by Hans Petersen on Jan 15, 2012 11:24 AM CST up reply actions  

Sorry, Dave...

But I disagree on Williams. As many times as our offense won games without defensive support, it’s perfectly reasonable to demand that a defense bail out the offense in a game like this. This game shoud’ve been won. There’s some talent on our D, but GW doesn’t know how to utilize it. Some LB’s and a real pass rusher would be great, too.

"I don't suffer from drug addiction. I enjoy it very much."

by cajuncreation on Jan 15, 2012 10:56 AM CST reply actions  

But...

They make plays when they need to, right?

"I don't suffer from drug addiction. I enjoy it very much."

by cajuncreation on Jan 15, 2012 10:57 AM CST up reply actions  

Dave, everyone is entitled to an opinion. No problem with Harper or his play yesterday. He makes some great plays and gets caught out on others. So be it.

And I agree that GW’s defense kept us in the game for almost three quarters. However, I just see regression with GW at the helm of this defense and I cannot believe you can argue that we have not regressed from 2010 and 2009. My view on this is that coaches of GW’s nature generally have a finite time frame at any one team. His philsophy of getting the most out of his team by motivation and preaching smash mouth football can, generally, only work for so long with the same group of players. To be honest, you can only hear so many motivational speeches from any one coach before it starts falling a little on deaf ears. And that is why GW has moved around so much in his coaching career. I fear that if he stays for another year we will not see anything different.

I have no problem wit the guy. Thank you GW for your significant contribution. I just think his shelf life with the saints has passed assuming we can find a suitable replacement.

by HRP-SAINT on Jan 15, 2012 10:58 AM CST reply actions  

boom rec'd

This is it Hans. I was thinking in that area but couldn’t articulate it as well. It’s the idenity of the defense and perception isn’t always the problem, but when it’s backed up by a record that dismays, I’m done. With this defensive philosophy, I mean. If this is all GW can get from this defense, minus turnovers, it’s just not good enough to compete.

"I am a Saints player. Look, sir" Patrick Robinson

by CrazyforColston on Jan 15, 2012 12:13 PM CST up reply actions  

2009 was the year of the turnovers. I really thought that by 2010, they would have the awesome combination of good, hard fundamental tackling while also taking away the ball. Imagine my disappointment. I convinced myself that 2011 would be that year. Nope, even worse. I don’t know what the answer is, but it seems obvious there needs to be a change.

"It's better to burn out than fade away."

by SaintsFan-KS on Jan 15, 2012 1:54 PM CST up reply actions  

Pondering on the defense...is the fault talent, or scheme?

It seems we’ve invested a lot of time and effort the last few seasons on the defense, both through the draft and free agency. Ellis, Jenkins, PRob, Cam Jordan, Martez Wilson, etc, in the draft, and Franklin, Rogers, Herring, Greer in free agency.

So, is our front office screwing up talent evaluation, or is it just the scheme? Is it possible that the right DC comes in, changes the scheme, and we see a dramatic improvement, sort of like the Texans had when Phillips came in? Just think about it, if we could be even “average” on defense, we’d be winning Lombardi’s every year with the offense we have.

by RobertM320 on Jan 15, 2012 7:44 PM CST up reply actions  

Maybe?? More like DEFINITELY.

If you can’t create a scheme where you cover their best receiver (and in Vernon Davis’ case, their ONLY receiver), where your strong safety is running around like a Chinese fire drill, and you can’t create a decent pass rush with your front four and drop people into coverage…well, it’s not only the scheme, it’s the coaches and players who execute it.

There are NO EXCUSES here. The offense did what it could and more to win the game. Gregg Williams and this porous passing D just p**sed it away.

He needs to go, and Jenkins, Shanle, Will Smith, and all the rest of those no-tackling, no covering fools need to go with him to St. Louis. Bring on Jack del Rio and a scheme and players who know how to cover, tackle, and rush the passer.

by Anthony_JK on Jan 16, 2012 8:51 AM CST up reply actions  

YUP!

“Bring on Jack del Rio and a scheme and players who know how to cover, tackle, and rush the passer.” Or any other DC that is more interested in fundamentals than gimmicks.

by jray2000 on Jan 16, 2012 12:05 PM CST up reply actions  

GW did not make any adjustments in the passing game. but the saints have nothing in regards to the pass rush.

by balaramesh on Jan 17, 2012 12:33 PM CST up reply actions  

Well put and I agree

If the Saints did not have the offense that they do we would never win a game! The reason Williams’ live by the sword die by the sword play calling is tolerated is because the offense takes the focus away from the crappy defensive play. We lost to Alex Smith for gods sake! No disrespect intended, but he is not what is called an ELITE QB. He manages the game well, but our D made him look great. Always a Saints fan, but this loss was really frustrating. I give them credit for overcoming so many mistakes, but there’s only so many mistakes that can be made before you fail. GW has failed and it’s time for a new DC. Maybe Spags?

by meitze on Jan 16, 2012 1:45 PM CST up reply actions  

We lost to Alex Smith for gods sake! No disrespect intended, but he is not what is called an ELITE QB.

I’mma let you finish, but Alex Smith is the greatest 49ers QB of all time.

"I don’t intend to draw any conclusions from any single game." -Brian Burke
"I will now attempt to exclude specific large amounts of TOP from the totals of winning teams, in order to prove that TOP doesn't contribute to winning." -Dr. Jeremy Arkes

by coldpizza on Jan 16, 2012 4:03 PM CST up reply actions  

I have no problem with Harper or Jenkins.

They were put in a bad position. The Saints defense did play well most of the game, but lets not forget that the 49ers had one of the worst offenses in the league.

Also, Shanle was responsible for the last TD. Smith was watching Davis the whole play. Shanle should have stayed with Davis.

by Hornets78 on Jan 15, 2012 11:15 AM CST reply actions  

Here's how the final drive played out,

The Niners had a minute and 30 left. Saints play a zone, they complete two short passes wasting 50 secs. They were only on their own 33 before the big pass to Davis on a blitz.

by Hornets78 on Jan 15, 2012 11:19 AM CST reply actions   1 recs

Just a question

I guess in the crowded place I was in last night I missed this, but does anyone know why Roby was returning kick-offs?

A SAINT in Panther country

by carolinasaintsfan on Jan 15, 2012 11:23 AM CST reply actions  

My guess

is that they wanted to spare Sproles some wear and tear on his body once they realized that PT was out for the game. Sproles was suddenly needed for a larger role in the run game. Roby wasn’t ready to return kicks. That Pierre Thomas injury probably cost us the game more than anything else. He looked like he got knocked out and his fumble stopped dead a scoring drive. The offense seemed to sputter a little after they lost him.

"As soon as Tony (Dungy) said we had no chance, I knew we had 'em right where we wanted 'em"--Coach Sean Payton right after Super Bowl XLIV with the Lombardi Trophy firmly in hand. WHO DAT!!

by David "Satch" Kelly on Jan 15, 2012 11:31 AM CST up reply actions  

After Thomas got knocked out

they didn’t want to risk getting Sproles injured on a return.

by Jimbo03 on Jan 15, 2012 11:32 AM CST up reply actions  

I'm just dead inside

Gotta take a break from sports for a while. I don’t even feel like watching today’s games and I’m totally avoiding sports channels. I’m still kinda hungover from stuffing myself with beer and hot wings last night.

It was a great and exciting game and I’m as disappointed as anyone about how our D couldn’t hold the lead at the end, but Gregg Williams is a great coach and a large reason why we finally won a SB. Roman Harper is one of the best SS in the league. Yes, it all fell apart for us at the end, but the 49ers brought their A game and are worthy of the win. I truly believed for most of the season that the 2011 Saints were even better than the 2009 Saints. That loss in St. Louis looms tremendously large because it cost us the 2nd seed, the bye week, and playing this game at home. The road to the SB was much harder this year and we just blew our engine yesterday. It’s painful, but life goes on.

Let’s not lose our minds too much.

"As soon as Tony (Dungy) said we had no chance, I knew we had 'em right where we wanted 'em"--Coach Sean Payton right after Super Bowl XLIV with the Lombardi Trophy firmly in hand. WHO DAT!!

by David "Satch" Kelly on Jan 15, 2012 11:28 AM CST reply actions  

this team had two chances in the reg season (@ TB, @ St. Louis)

to make sure this game is played in NOLA, and they failed to do it (on the road, with a temporarily stymied offense for a time, and too many giveaways) then they lost in pretty much the same way yesterday.

Oh well. Wait til next year?

Having the ball is better than not having the ball. And if you punt,
not only does it mean you don't have the ball anymore—
it means you didn't score, which sucks.

by Hans Petersen on Jan 15, 2012 11:40 AM CST up reply actions  

I'm sick of this wait until next year crap...

I waited more than 30 years for them to win a SB and thank goodness they finally did, but they have the chance to be a dynasty team – much like the Pats, Colts, SF and Cowboys were. We have the talent on Offense, but our D is just bad – most of the time giving up big plays that in a close game can lead to a loss – like last year and this year. The Saints have the tools on Offense to be the best ever and it’s just a shame that all that will never be truly recognized because of their aweful D. I guess there is nothing to do, but wait until next season and keep hoping things change.

by meitze on Jan 16, 2012 2:00 PM CST up reply actions  

I'm done with football until August...

As far as I’m concerned it’s hockey/baseball season now

by Uncle Mo's Family Feedbag on Jan 15, 2012 3:25 PM CST up reply actions  

So you’re done with sports until August?

Haters gon' hate...

by TAYDIGGA on Jan 15, 2012 5:47 PM CST up reply actions  

GDUB and his defense...

Dave i agree with the points you made and i think that our defense overall played very well with the circumstances we they had to play with. The fact that we we even had a lead near the end was a testimony to GW and the defense.
Our struggles against opposing TE’s goes back for several years and many of those miserable performances were largely the fault of ROMAN HARPER and pur defensive gameplan….yesterday included (see the 49 yd TD and 1 or 2 other catches in the first half). Harper is a liability in pass coverage not only because he lacks the speed to cover today’s TE’s but because his awareness in coverage is ZERO. How many times have we seen this guy in position to make a play if he would simply turn his head around or was a fraction of a step faster (see the game winning TD yesterday)?
GW’s runs a scheme and that scheme works best when we have a lead. The problems with his defense is that we have no talent on any level that transcends the scheme. hat is tosay nobody is going to make play on their own absent the scheme. There is a serious problem with our pass rush when our SS leads the teams in QB sacks!!!! there is a serious problem when every TE we play looks like shannon sharp, there is a serious problem when we cannot generate a TO with some kind of reckless all out blitz that exposes our secondary to the explosive play.
In the end the 49ers and saints demonstrate what they are and had been all season. 49ers: an aggressive speedy defense that generates TO’s. conservative offense with no receiving threat besides davis. the saints: high scoring offense with great QB play and attacking defense that has shines at times, but has limitations. We also saw each team do things that they had not…Alex Smith looked like Aaron rogers…of course that was the case the last we we played too….HMMMM!?! and the saints turned the ball over repeatedly and played stout defense most of the game. all things considered the game was a wash and came down to who had the ball at the end…they did and they won. Does GW deserve to fired NO! However i do question the logic of putting our FS in single coverage against a BEAST of a TE with no help, but whatever i guess it was better than harper.
what do we need? IMO:More speed at DL, LB and SS. Ive said many times the NFL is changing. The rules allow for record setting QB play and passing offense. Clearly, in a world like that your SS playing in the backfield on passing plays is high risk. We need to get ahead of this curve just like we did with our offense attack.

by jray2000 on Jan 15, 2012 11:37 AM CST reply actions  

Ok will say it again quoting my hubby:

As soon as SF lined up he knew what was coming at our D, they went into Protective mode instead of attack mode. Our D line or Williams failed to shift the line or play to cover their O line. Not sure how accurate this is (but he has been watching football many more years than I) so I will just accept what he says he saw( as I am only truly watching the game passionately in the last 8 years or so). All we can hope for at this time is that we play better next year, correct our mistakes in both Offense & Defense, keep our great players from walking to another team (Colston, Brees just to name a few), and draft some great players. AND HOPE WHOEVER WINS TODAY LAYS THE WOOD ON SF NEXT WEEK!

LOVING MOORE, GRAHAM AND THE COOL BREES!

by N_O_1saintfan on Jan 15, 2012 11:39 AM CST reply actions  

There will be no cake and ice cream and hugs at 5800 Airline Drive when Williams packs up his desk and moves up river.

by klaatu71 on Jan 15, 2012 11:40 AM CST reply actions  

not even face cake?

Having the ball is better than not having the ball. And if you punt,
not only does it mean you don't have the ball anymore—
it means you didn't score, which sucks.

by Hans Petersen on Jan 15, 2012 11:43 AM CST up reply actions  

Scariest face cake ever! Jeeeeeez!

Expect more...you'll get more...and if you don't, start over!

by Stilljreming on Jan 15, 2012 11:49 AM CST up reply actions  

I think it's from the wrap-party after last episode of The Walking Dead

Having the ball is better than not having the ball. And if you punt,
not only does it mean you don't have the ball anymore—
it means you didn't score, which sucks.

by Hans Petersen on Jan 15, 2012 1:30 PM CST up reply actions  

Controlled reaction

My reaction isn’t anger towards players or Greg Williams, but I do think it’s time to try a different strategy. 2009 was a great year and the defense has been better in 2010 and 2011 than what it was before Williams came on, but I think that two seasons with as few turnovers and sacks as we have had means that it’s time to try something different. If this defense generated a league average number of turnovers and sacks, we’d probably have been playing in the dome this week and might’ve been an historically dominant team.

Not to mention that we drafted a DE that was worth passing up Mark Ingram (and later trading up to get him) who was seriously unimpressive all season and that we had a rotation of what should’ve been the best group DTs in football (Franklin, Rogers, and former first rounder Ellis) who were below average. Rogers, Franklin, and Ellis combined for 0.5 sacks and no forced fumbles this year, which is 5.5 less sacks and 2 forced fumbles less than Ellis got in 2010 alone. We were a much better team this year than last (largely due to the offense being one of the best ever) and certain aspects of the defense got better, but it was overall worse.

Just like with Reggie Bush last year, no hate, much respect and appreciation, but time to part ways and try something else.

by GnomeChumpsky on Jan 15, 2012 11:41 AM CST reply actions  

yup!

we have no defensive players that we must keep.

by jray2000 on Jan 15, 2012 11:43 AM CST up reply actions  

Maybe a few

I think Greer is safe, Robinson is safe, Porter is certainly worth not giving up on. Jenkins should be back. I’m on the fence about Harper. Smith is okay, but he should take a pay cut. Franklin and Rogers should be gone if we can find replacements I think Jordan will be better, but he’s going to have a ceiling that’s not really first rounder level. Vilma … I just don’t know, seemed like Dunbar did fine in his place.

by GnomeChumpsky on Jan 15, 2012 12:14 PM CST up reply actions  

Porter is certainly worth not giving up on.

In 2011, he showed nothing to indicate this. Allowed 3 of 4 passes to be completed to his man. It’s the end of his contract, got to be moving on.

by klaatu71 on Jan 15, 2012 12:45 PM CST up reply actions  

i'm not talking about giving up on anyone

i’m talking about going another direction altogether. getting ahead of this arial circus we call the NFL. with the limited talent and players we have on defense GW’s defense is fundamentally flawed.

by jray2000 on Jan 15, 2012 12:58 PM CST up reply actions  

I think that he could be one of the best nickelbacks in the league if he can play like 09 again. Solid depth, let us not forget how bad cornerbacks can get (Jason David).

by GnomeChumpsky on Jan 15, 2012 4:27 PM CST up reply actions  

if he can play like 09 again.

2010=no
2011=no
Not interested in an attempt at 2012

by klaatu71 on Jan 15, 2012 6:50 PM CST up reply actions  

Can’t disagree. Porter is our Larry Brown or Dexter Jackson. In fact, that may be giving him too much credit, as he wasn’t named Super Bowl MVP.

"I don’t intend to draw any conclusions from any single game." -Brian Burke
"I will now attempt to exclude specific large amounts of TOP from the totals of winning teams, in order to prove that TOP doesn't contribute to winning." -Dr. Jeremy Arkes

by coldpizza on Jan 15, 2012 7:00 PM CST up reply actions  

does "safe" equall "must keep"

i doubt it. I’d give up any of those players for a shot at the next Suh, Willis, reed, revis, etc. those types of players transcend the defensive scheme. who’d have thought cam joordan would not get one F’n sack this year….not one!!!! 1st round pick…not one!!!!

by jray2000 on Jan 15, 2012 12:54 PM CST up reply actions  

NFL Combine notes for Cam Jordan:

Probably will never be an impact pass rusher, hasn’t put up big sack totals, but still works hard in that area.

by klaatu71 on Jan 15, 2012 1:14 PM CST up reply actions  

?

what made him a 1st round pick? his ability to clog the middle?…LOL,. i thought that was sed, franklin, and roger’s job?

by jray2000 on Jan 15, 2012 2:33 PM CST up reply actions  

His ability to play the run. He was basically viewed as a younger, more energetic version of Alex Brown. If we wanted a pass rusher, we could have easily gotten Houston in the 2nd. Or reached for Sheard. Not saying I agree with the Jordan pick, just that it was fairly obvious what you wouldn’t be getting with it. That’s why I would have simply taken Ingram at 24 and waited on the pass rusher.

"I don’t intend to draw any conclusions from any single game." -Brian Burke
"I will now attempt to exclude specific large amounts of TOP from the totals of winning teams, in order to prove that TOP doesn't contribute to winning." -Dr. Jeremy Arkes

by coldpizza on Jan 15, 2012 2:57 PM CST up reply actions  

GOOD INFO CP

I’D be lying if i said i really keep up with the draft much past pick 5. i seem to remember the alex brown comparison. i guess i just had loftier expectations than NO SACKS AND a 5 yard per carry average against our defense. CP didn’t you regrade all of our drafts once? I see a solid “F” on this class.

by jray2000 on Jan 16, 2012 12:41 AM CST up reply actions  

WAY too early for that

too early to evaluate Jordan. While we know he’s not going to be Julius Peppers, it can take DLmen a couple of years to fully develop. He could still turn into a solid starter a la Will Smith

"But tonight the Superbowl belongs to the City of New Orleans" - Roger Goodell 2/7/2010

by SaintBevo on Jan 16, 2012 9:28 AM CST up reply actions  

then... SB and SHIP

as of this moment, it was an EPIC FAIL on all accounts. If past returns are indicative of future results we have an awesome set of first round fodder.

by jray2000 on Jan 16, 2012 12:09 PM CST up reply actions  

yes, we need to try something different. It's called acquiring a pass rusher and getting rid of Will Smith and the rest.

Maybe keep Cam Jordan, but he will never be an elite pass rusher.

"We've established the run; we've established the pass. Now all we have to establish is another championship!"
"Some say the glass is half empty;
Some say the glass is half full.
I say- 'are you going to finish that beer'?"

by Philinwood on Jan 15, 2012 12:05 PM CST up reply actions  

really Will Smith?

CAREER STATSMORE
Season Team Tackles Interceptions Fumbles
G GS Comb Total Ast Sck SFTY PDef Int Yds Avg Lng TDs FF
2011 New Orleans Saints 14 14 35 22 13 6.5 — 2 — — 0.0 — — 2
2010 New Orleans Saints 15 15 39 34 5 5.5 — 5 1 4 4.0 4 0 1
2009 New Orleans Saints 16 16 49 36 13 13.0 — 3 1 0 0.0 0 0 3
2008 New Orleans Saints 16 16 61 43 18 3.0 — 1 — — 0.0 — — 1
2007 New Orleans Saints 16 16 66 47 19 7.0 1 3 — — 0.0 — — 2
2006 New Orleans Saints 14 14 49 31 18 10.5 — 3 — — 0.0 — — 3
2005 New Orleans Saints 16 9 60 48 12 8.5 — 4 — — 0.0 — — 2
2004 New Orleans Saints 16 4 40 30 10 7.5 — 2 — — 0.0 — — 6
TOTAL 399 291 108 61.5 1 23 2 4 — 4 0 20

LOVING MOORE, GRAHAM AND THE COOL BREES!

by N_O_1saintfan on Jan 15, 2012 1:17 PM CST up reply actions  

Those are decent numbers, especially if you take injuries into account.

by GnomeChumpsky on Jan 15, 2012 4:29 PM CST up reply actions  

The Old Saints would have lost 35-14

I’m proud of their effort to get back in this game. One of our best Defensive games. Save the last 40 sec. Said it last night, no real pressure from front 4 (all season), SF’s front 4 was stout and made Brees second guess and hesitate all day, so they could drop 7 in coverage.
If I could delete one play in the 1st H, Roby’s fumble, he’s just got to fall on the ball. Take the loss we would’ve been backed up deep any way. Roman Harper played well all yr, we know his weakness’ its up front pressure or lack of, that make d-backs look bad.

You think you know, and you don't know, and you never, ever, will.-Jim Mora Sr.
I understand ....nothing.-Michael Scott
The Future is Unwritten.-Joe Strummer
"First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win."-Mahatma Gandhi

by metryman on Jan 15, 2012 11:46 AM CST reply actions   2 recs

BOOM rec's ya

d-backs live and die on the pass rush of the front 4.

"We've established the run; we've established the pass. Now all we have to establish is another championship!"
"Some say the glass is half empty;
Some say the glass is half full.
I say- 'are you going to finish that beer'?"

by Philinwood on Jan 15, 2012 11:53 AM CST up reply actions  

Yup!

which is y we need a better scheme than our SS leading the team ins acks.

by jray2000 on Jan 15, 2012 1:00 PM CST up reply actions  

Anyway, I just saw that Adam Schefter of ESPN reports that G-Will is a goner

to the Rams to be Jeff Fisher’s D-Coord!

So, the search can begin, I say we should go after Steve Spagnuolo!

Expect more...you'll get more...and if you don't, start over!

by Stilljreming on Jan 15, 2012 11:47 AM CST reply actions  

Still speculating

Haven’t seen any actual reports that he’s gone. Shefter is also speculating that Carl Nicks is expected to leave. That’s total bulls***! I won’t believe that until he’s actually out the door. I think he’s underestimating Loomis’ ability to keep quality players. Maybe we do need a fresh start on D with a new coordinator and new players, but I’ll still remember the good times with GW and black out the bad times.

"As soon as Tony (Dungy) said we had no chance, I knew we had 'em right where we wanted 'em"--Coach Sean Payton right after Super Bowl XLIV with the Lombardi Trophy firmly in hand. WHO DAT!!

by David "Satch" Kelly on Jan 15, 2012 12:01 PM CST up reply actions  

Carl Nicks is expected to leave.

He’ll be able to earn big money and he knows Mickey won’t pay it, so he’s out the door. They all saw what happened to PT. Colston also said publicly “no hometown discount”. That’s pure reaction to Mickey Loomis.

by klaatu71 on Jan 15, 2012 12:49 PM CST up reply actions  

I’m really hoping they pay Nicks. He’s integral to Drew’s style of play. We need dominant guards.

by GnomeChumpsky on Jan 15, 2012 4:30 PM CST up reply actions  

Dave, I agree with your colounm 100%

My view is that GW’s defense and defensive scheme was good enough to get us to the playoffs and got us to this 4th quarter with 5 turnovers by the offense. We did that well with an aggressive D and with 1:40 left IT IS NO TIME TO REINVENT A NEW DEFENSIVE STRATEGY. YOU DO WHAT GOT YOU THERE AND YOU DO IT WELL !! GO DONB SWINGING- DON"T GET PASSIVE!!

The bottom line is SF did something better than they usually do. They were better when it counted. Their defense sucked in th 4th qtr but their offense was impressive and got the job done. If Harper had jarred the ball loose, we have a whole different ending. It was pretty amazing that Davis made that catch- that’s why I think it was just destiny that SF won.

WE have the worst front four pass rush of any team in the pl,ayoffs and worse than many non-playoff teams. GW did the best with what he had to work with.

"We've established the run; we've established the pass. Now all we have to establish is another championship!"
"Some say the glass is half empty;
Some say the glass is half full.
I say- 'are you going to finish that beer'?"

by Philinwood on Jan 15, 2012 11:52 AM CST reply actions  

I think Williams undermined out front four.

By him blitzing so much, it allowed QBs to attack in the passing game much easier. Plus, the reason why the team doesn’t do well blitzing is because the LBs are too slow to penetrate. If the team had faster LBs, then blitzing would be more successful. We’ve invested alot in the D-line and secondary yet Williams undermined both by blitzing too much. Having the CBs play tighter coverages and letting the LBs play back in zone would have allowed the D-line to rush better. Everytime the team would blitz, our CBs would be playing 7-10 yards off the WRs. Didn’t make any sense.

by Hornets78 on Jan 15, 2012 11:53 AM CST reply actions  

our d line sucks as pass rushers. That's the bottom line. Compare their stats to the rest of the league.

It’s pitiful. That’s why we blitz, because they suck so bad. And, without blitzing, wew would even be in the playoffs.

"We've established the run; we've established the pass. Now all we have to establish is another championship!"
"Some say the glass is half empty;
Some say the glass is half full.
I say- 'are you going to finish that beer'?"

by Philinwood on Jan 15, 2012 12:03 PM CST up reply actions  

I disagree Dave....respectfully

The Saints safeties have had difficulty covering in space all year. Vernon Davis was the one true threat for the Niners. To leave the middle of the field protected only by a safety on a gimpy ankle (Harper) with Davis covered by a safety in press coverage was an extremely low percentage high risk strategy. There is a difference between being strategically aggressive and foolhardy. The defensive strategy at the end was foolhardy.

We had playmakers in the DB position in 2009. Not this year. We went all in with a pair of deuces when there was no need. So yes, I say fire Williams. And it wasn’t exactly a ringing endorsement of the strategy that Payton gave after the game yesterday, so I might not be alone in my thinking.

"I have had a perfectly wonderful evening, but this wasn't it." Groucho Marx

by BenDerDonDat on Jan 15, 2012 11:55 AM CST reply actions  

Shanle was in the middle of the field, go look again. He missed tipping the pass by a foot or two. It was a great throw.

"We've established the run; we've established the pass. Now all we have to establish is another championship!"
"Some say the glass is half empty;
Some say the glass is half full.
I say- 'are you going to finish that beer'?"

by Philinwood on Jan 15, 2012 1:58 PM CST up reply actions  

Good morning all.......................

Great game yesterday huh………………Two plays on the “D” and we win……Five plays on the "O’ and we win. Unfortunately, these seven plays cost us the game. Not because the "O’ and "D’ did not play great but you all have to admit, That Niner “D” was great and we still should have won. It just did not work out so time to move on. We have an entire off season to see what Payloo does to rectify our defensive problems and I feel it will get done. Great year !!!!

My Magnificent Black and Gold Warriors

by saint-sly on Jan 15, 2012 11:59 AM CST reply actions  

in 2009 we had a pass rush and sacks

not this year. If you watch other NFL games,almost all of the other teams have trouble with safeties covering TEs. Did you see even Tebow take adavantge of this? How about how many times the Eagles got ripped upby many teams this year. Good safeties are really, really hard to find and when they make a mistake, it’s big and evreyone notices. Where was Troy Palamalau last week- he ’s about the best there is.

Did you ever notice how many safeties Jimmy Graham has made look bad? Didn’t he do that like a few plays earlier?How about Tony Gonzalez at 40 years old? How about Shockey? Even Michael Higgins can come in a game last week and this, and hard play and still have a catch or two and a first down.

We have good safeties. What we don’t have is a pass rush.

"We've established the run; we've established the pass. Now all we have to establish is another championship!"
"Some say the glass is half empty;
Some say the glass is half full.
I say- 'are you going to finish that beer'?"

by Philinwood on Jan 15, 2012 12:01 PM CST reply actions  

gibbs was too conservative and gdub is too aggressive...

need to find a new def cord who is just right.

"As a Saint fan I watch ‘Gone with the Wind’ just to watch Atlanta burn" -Ralph Malbrough

by DrewBreesManCrush on Jan 15, 2012 12:07 PM CST reply actions  

Disagree

We need to find some guys for the front four who can actually pressure the QB. The reason GW is so aggressive with his blitzes and something the TV sports experts douchebags seem oblivious to is that his front four guys (I’m talkin’ bout you Smith, Ellis, Franklin, Rogers, and Jordan) can’t effectively get pressure.

"As soon as Tony (Dungy) said we had no chance, I knew we had 'em right where we wanted 'em"--Coach Sean Payton right after Super Bowl XLIV with the Lombardi Trophy firmly in hand. WHO DAT!!

by David "Satch" Kelly on Jan 15, 2012 12:15 PM CST up reply actions  

what we didnt have when gibbs was here

was cb’s that could actually play man. blitzing a team like that is feast or famine. why not let smith dink and dunk down the field while killing clock.

"As a Saint fan I watch ‘Gone with the Wind’ just to watch Atlanta burn" -Ralph Malbrough

by DrewBreesManCrush on Jan 15, 2012 12:24 PM CST up reply actions  

BUT

…is our front four ineffective and unreliable because they lack ability, or is it the scheme? Shaun Rogers and Aubrayo Franklin (who must be kicking himself) were dominant players under other systems. Perhaps Rogers is over the hill, but nobody thought Franklin was. He certainly didn’t dominate as a Saint. Why?

"Sinn Féin, motherf*****s!"

by MtnExile on Jan 15, 2012 12:54 PM CST up reply actions   1 recs

were dominant players under other systems.

Now they’re old and fat and can’t even play 4 quarters. What a difference a few years makes. The System? Not as much.

by klaatu71 on Jan 15, 2012 1:15 PM CST up reply actions  

but nobody thought Franklin was.

Well, somebody knew something. rotoworld.com:

The 49ers have no plans to re-sign NT Aubrayo Franklin or OLB Manny Lawson. Both have been greeted by seemingly soft markets
The best nose tackle on the market has surprisingly received little known interest
Franklin’s market was slow to develop for unknown reasons
Also, he’s 31 years old. Gassed.

by klaatu71 on Jan 15, 2012 1:19 PM CST up reply actions  

Hi! Niners fan here! Just felt like reminding you

After all the smack that was talked… This is now 2 years in a row the Saints have been sent packing by the lowly NFC West. Maybe next year this Brees guy will step up instead of getting outplayed by some no-namer Smith guy. Thanks Saints fans. Loved the expression on Payton’s face at the end of the game Karma mofo.

Gimme 1 round!

by ItBurnzWhenIP on Jan 15, 2012 12:09 PM CST via mobile reply actions  

Nice of you to come by

Feel free to stop by anytime and show us what a low-life prick does with his time. Hope to see you again next week.

Hmmm...
I probably shouldn’t come on this. ;-)

Wanna say something? Sign up! It's free!
by Dave Cariello on Aug 24, 2011 10:31 AM PDT

by Cajun in CA on Jan 15, 2012 12:22 PM CST up reply actions  

Karma mofo:

Hoping whoever plays you next weeks lights you up good, gives a couple of your guys a good helmet to helmet to knock you out, and horse collars Alex good! Remember what goes around comes around!

LOVING MOORE, GRAHAM AND THE COOL BREES!

by N_O_1saintfan on Jan 15, 2012 12:24 PM CST up reply actions  

Now, now, they don’t even have a quarterback worth hurting, I’m sure Kaepernick is just as “good” as Smith and they’ll both be getting into the HOF with Drew.

by GnomeChumpsky on Jan 15, 2012 4:33 PM CST up reply actions  

Not sure if you are stupid or just can't read stats

Brees: 463 4 tds

Smith: 299 3 tds

???

Your team barely won and had 5 turnovers come your way. I wouldn’t get to happy. Green Bay will stomp you.

by Memphisexile on Jan 15, 2012 12:28 PM CST up reply actions  

Not in the mood for arrogant A-holes today.

Dave, this douche is obviously a piece of s*** who didn’t get enough love as a child. Can we get a ban here?

"As soon as Tony (Dungy) said we had no chance, I knew we had 'em right where we wanted 'em"--Coach Sean Payton right after Super Bowl XLIV with the Lombardi Trophy firmly in hand. WHO DAT!!

by David "Satch" Kelly on Jan 15, 2012 12:30 PM CST up reply actions  

Thanks

"As soon as Tony (Dungy) said we had no chance, I knew we had 'em right where we wanted 'em"--Coach Sean Payton right after Super Bowl XLIV with the Lombardi Trophy firmly in hand. WHO DAT!!

by David "Satch" Kelly on Jan 15, 2012 12:32 PM CST up reply actions  

“We don’t care.”’

by klaatu71 on Jan 15, 2012 12:51 PM CST up reply actions  

dear god!!!

i think that any man that posts a pic of this show should be banned….of course i am forced to watch it too…hmmmm, nevermind.

by jray2000 on Jan 15, 2012 1:05 PM CST up reply actions  

The whole NFC west comment is fair

However dickish it might be. I would be thinking the same thing if I was them. Still a crappy division but either way the original comment is true.

But lol at Brees getting outplayed by Smith.

by SarahT on Jan 15, 2012 11:36 PM CST up reply actions  

Actually, Brees DIDN'T get outplayed.

Coming back from a 17-0 deficit and two major drives in the fourth quarter to take the lead is not my idea of being “outplayed”.

This offense, if it keeps intact, will scare the HELL out of people for the next 5 years. It’s the defense that needs retooling…and a new leader.

by Anthony_JK on Jan 16, 2012 9:01 AM CST up reply actions  

i agree

Brees is truly a master and i NEVER doubted his ability to lead back to victory….which he did. Brees is as good as there has ever been and his performence yesterday was marvelous.

by jray2000 on Jan 16, 2012 12:11 PM CST up reply actions  

You sir are a complete and total idiot! FIRE GREGG WILLIAMS NOW!

by RebelHeart on Jan 15, 2012 12:25 PM CST reply actions  

Also banned for personal attack.

I think I’ve gotten rid of about 15 members in the past 24 hours. Certainly not going to slow down now. If you’re this angry, I suggest staying away from the internet for a little while.

Wanna say something? Sign up! It's free!

by Dave Cariello on Jan 15, 2012 12:33 PM CST up reply actions  

Great suggestion

I think we all need a time out. Passions are still high right now and it’s too early in the day to start drinking. Well, it is for me at least.

"As soon as Tony (Dungy) said we had no chance, I knew we had 'em right where we wanted 'em"--Coach Sean Payton right after Super Bowl XLIV with the Lombardi Trophy firmly in hand. WHO DAT!!

by David "Satch" Kelly on Jan 15, 2012 12:37 PM CST up reply actions  

Dave, keep doing what you have to do.

I got banned right at the end last night. Not sure if by you or someone else, but I deserved it by violating the cursing rule.

What’s amazing is over on NinersNation, when Sproles scored his TD with four minutes left, the first 10 straight posts were, F, F, F, etc. Most were just the one word. And they’re fine with that. I asked later and they said they “waive site decorum” on game days due to emotions running high. I brought up the fact that kids are on the blog as well, and they said its nothing they haven’t seen before, and just dismissed it. There blog was filled with cursing to the point of being obnoxious.

Whatever you do, please DON’T waive site decorum here. Our team represents us and our city well, let’s do the same for them, and our city. Stay classy, CSC and NOLA.

by RobertM320 on Jan 15, 2012 8:02 PM CST up reply actions  

Too late...

Game threads already are an immunity zone for the cursers.

Repeat? Run it!

by FrenchFreak on Jan 15, 2012 8:17 PM CST up reply actions  

If that's true, they why would I have been banned?

It was a game thread, and I cursed. One time. And I was gone.

by RobertM320 on Jan 16, 2012 12:37 PM CST up reply actions  

Looking at the other blogs that allow it

Really makes you see how much better it is without it.

by SarahT on Jan 15, 2012 11:38 PM CST up reply actions  

Not too much to say besides what has already been said.

Although the D kept us in the game for 3.5 quarters, I am putting this loss on GW. He’s done a lot of good things for us, and his game plan for the NFCCG v. the Vikings was pretty much the only reason we won that game, but the fact is that he gave up two touchdown drives in about 3 minutes to Alex Smith and the 49ers offense. Smith has proven that he is definitely a good QB, but I don’t think he’s THAT good. The 49ers offense is not a quick-score offense. If the game had been lost on a slower, more methodical 4-5 minute drive with a FG at the end, then maybe it would’ve been a little more understandable.

But that’s not what happened. Smith drove down the field in a little under two minutes right after we had FINALLY gotten the lead. Brees/Graham get it right back. Then the D gives up another 1.5 minute TD drive, using almost the same plan as the previous drive: blitz and leave their best player in single coverage.

It just baffles me that a defensive coordinator in the National Football League would actually think to himself, “Hmmmm we just blitzed them into oblivion and left what is by far their most dangerous receiver in single coverage and it resulted in a 2 minute touchdown drive with the game and the entire season on the line. What’s that? We have the lead again? And even if they score a field goal it goes into overtime, thus meaning that we should do whatever it takes to avoid a minute and a half touchdown drive like the one we just gave up? Well, we better use the same strategy again.” I mean, why? Just…why? We were holding up pretty well on the last drive. They took 45 seconds to gain…what…25 yards? I’ll take that. GW won’t.

Rant over. Blarg.

by JellyPhantom on Jan 15, 2012 1:15 PM CST reply actions  

BTW

I thought Harper, overall, had a pretty decent game. Jenkins? Meh.

by JellyPhantom on Jan 15, 2012 1:17 PM CST up reply actions  

and now I know what it sounds like when jellyfish burp
Blarg.

thanks, Phantom.

It would be nice if he had adapted a little bit for the situational context, but again, that’s not who he is, so if Pay-Loo feel like they like the calls, and just wish the players executed better, he’ll still be here, but if not, he won’t be re-signed.

I think I’d like someone who is consistent to their principles and practices, but able to adjust a bit in certain situations – he got away with those blitzes and singe coverages when the Saints would be up 2-3 TDs late…(and I agree with you big time, here, JP) but with just over a minute to go, and having just had the strategy allow a quick TD, why do it again? (Maybe on the tape it’ll show rushers were within inches of getting Smith on the first drive, and GW thought they’d be able to get him this time…)

Having the ball is better than not having the ball. And if you punt,
not only does it mean you don't have the ball anymore—
it means you didn't score, which sucks.

by Hans Petersen on Jan 15, 2012 1:40 PM CST up reply actions  

As I said in yesterday's thread

I am disappointed but not angry. The Saints played very well against a talented hostile defense. The Saints have a lot of players in their prime and the future is bright. Lot of fun times ahead.

I do not care if GW returns; in fact I hope he does not. Overall, the defense needs more playmakers, so I agree it is ludicrous for me or anyone else to lay this all at the doorstep of GW. But his decision making in the last 4 minutes of the game yesterday was curious at best, idiotic at worst. You can be aggressive without being nuts. Yesterday was nuts, and it was revealing of his arrogance.

On to next year and hopefully an impact pass rusher a playmaking linebacker and more sanity on the sidelines.

"I have had a perfectly wonderful evening, but this wasn't it." Groucho Marx

by BenDerDonDat on Jan 15, 2012 1:18 PM CST reply actions  

I do not care if GW returns; in fact I hope he does not.

Pick a side, schizo.

by klaatu71 on Jan 15, 2012 1:21 PM CST reply actions  

Wow

Where did that come from? My preference is that he leave, but cest la vie if he doesn’t. My reasoning? With our offense, even with 5 turnovers, we came all the way back and were In the lead twice. We did not need the defense at that time to win the game, just not to lose it. GW made calls defensively that led to the loss. Clear enough?

"I have had a perfectly wonderful evening, but this wasn't it." Groucho Marx

by BenDerDonDat on Jan 15, 2012 2:00 PM CST up reply actions  

just looked at my Hot Reads notebook

last note I took last night was this:

“17-14 Saints stop Niners and long sack – PUNT and Sproles FUM on NO 26 5th TO” I circled “5th TO” in red and then put the pen down for the rest of the game…so much happened after that, but I was too frustrated to continue taking notes.

Having the ball is better than not having the ball. And if you punt,
not only does it mean you don't have the ball anymore—
it means you didn't score, which sucks.

by Hans Petersen on Jan 15, 2012 1:50 PM CST reply actions  

If I had been taking notes, it would have been black Sharpie scribbles all over the page. I can’t watch football, but I keep coming back here. I guess looking for others that feel as crappy as I do today.

"It's better to burn out than fade away."

by SaintsFan-KS on Jan 15, 2012 1:52 PM CST up reply actions  

we can be there for each other

in time of need

I’m a walking, typing, freakin’ Hallmark card

Having the ball is better than not having the ball. And if you punt,
not only does it mean you don't have the ball anymore—
it means you didn't score, which sucks.

by Hans Petersen on Jan 15, 2012 2:28 PM CST up reply actions  

I’m a walking, typing, freakin’ Hallmark card

LMAO!!! First good laugh I’ve had since…well, you know.

"It's better to burn out than fade away."

by SaintsFan-KS on Jan 16, 2012 11:16 AM CST up reply actions  

since I giggled like a schoolgirl after Graham's TD catch and run

of course that laughter was soon replaced with screams of agony, then massive intake of the remaining beer in the bottle

"We live by the blitz, and we die by the blitz.'' - Roman Harper

"So I guess the blitz died.'' - Alex Smith

by Hans Petersen on Jan 16, 2012 1:59 PM CST up reply actions  

I stopped taking mine after that 2pts conversion.

Spent the rest of the game my jaw to the floor..

Repeat? Run it!

by FrenchFreak on Jan 15, 2012 2:57 PM CST up reply actions  

with all this venom towards GW and the idea that he blitzes too much

does anyone realize we didn’t blitz on the game winning play? We had 8 in coverage on like 4 receivers. Maybe we didn’t blitz enough.

"We've established the run; we've established the pass. Now all we have to establish is another championship!"
"Some say the glass is half empty;
Some say the glass is half full.
I say- 'are you going to finish that beer'?"

by Philinwood on Jan 15, 2012 1:54 PM CST reply actions  

the game winning play in my opinion was the 47 yd pass to davis

"As a Saint fan I watch ‘Gone with the Wind’ just to watch Atlanta burn" -Ralph Malbrough

by DrewBreesManCrush on Jan 15, 2012 1:58 PM CST up reply actions  

obviously that's incorrect. they had 14 seconds and then it would have been a fg. we needed to defend that last play

and it would have been OT- advantage Saints. How can a game winning play not be in the end zone?

"We've established the run; we've established the pass. Now all we have to establish is another championship!"
"Some say the glass is half empty;
Some say the glass is half full.
I say- 'are you going to finish that beer'?"

by Philinwood on Jan 15, 2012 2:00 PM CST reply actions  

My thoughts on this
  1. GW, his scheme and his attitude in general had a large part in our winning the Super Bowl. I will be eternally grateful to him for that season in general and that night in Miami in particular.
  2. Yesterday, the defense kept us in that game and played probably their best game (although in retrospect I think they were helped by some awfully conservative play calling by Harbaugh).
  3. I have been disappointed in the progression (or lack there of) of the defense in general since GW’s first year. I was hoping that the 2009 season was the tip of the iceberg and our defense would continue to improve. It has had its moments but overall I expected better.
  4. I have been disappointed in particular in the development of the young DBs. I don’t know if coaching is to blame for that, and certainly the players bear the lions share of the responsibility. 2-3 years ago I thought that Tracy Porter was a young shutdown corner on the come and Malcolm Jenkins was a star. Jenkins has had an awful year and Porter hasn’t been the same since the Super Bowl.
  5. I’m all for aggression, but it must be paired with common sense. I was totally fine with blitzing but you cannot let their best receiver beat you. The only player they had that was going to make those plays down the stretch was Davis. This wasn’t a pick your poison situation. Make Crabtree or Ginn or one of their WRS (who probably wouldn’t make our roster) beat you. Just not Davis.

I don’t know if GW is gone or not. If he is, I wish him luck and hope that we go get another top flight DC who can improve this defense. We don’t need to have the 49er’s defense to win championships. If it were a top 10 or 15 unit, we’re making our viewing plans for next Sunday.

"But tonight the Superbowl belongs to the City of New Orleans" - Roger Goodell 2/7/2010

by SaintBevo on Jan 15, 2012 2:10 PM CST reply actions  

yeah

after 2010, I thought, ok defense gets more stops and less point – now if the offense can just return close to 2009 levels, we’ll have ourselves a GREAT TEAM!!!

And what happened, was the offense did bounce back – MUCH better than I had hoped – but defense regressed…GAA!! C’mon, Man!! And I don’t know why it’s so different in 2011 from 2010 – they supposably upgraded the DL…

Having the ball is better than not having the ball. And if you punt,
not only does it mean you don't have the ball anymore—
it means you didn't score, which sucks.

by Hans Petersen on Jan 15, 2012 2:31 PM CST up reply actions  

Make Crabtree or Ginn or one of their WRS (who probably wouldn’t make our roster) beat you.

Just out of curiosity, are you referring to WRs outside of Crabtree or Ginn? Or are you actually suggesting that Crabtree and/or Ginn wouldn’t make our roster?

"I don’t intend to draw any conclusions from any single game." -Brian Burke
"I will now attempt to exclude specific large amounts of TOP from the totals of winning teams, in order to prove that TOP doesn't contribute to winning." -Dr. Jeremy Arkes

by coldpizza on Jan 15, 2012 3:01 PM CST up reply actions  

I would hope it’s the former. Ginn would be a clear upgrade over Roby and probably Arrington, as well. I could even see him beating out Henderson, based on Devery’s age. Crabtree would likely be our top WR and a borderline superstar in this offense.

"I don’t intend to draw any conclusions from any single game." -Brian Burke
"I will now attempt to exclude specific large amounts of TOP from the totals of winning teams, in order to prove that TOP doesn't contribute to winning." -Dr. Jeremy Arkes

by coldpizza on Jan 15, 2012 3:04 PM CST up reply actions  

Living here and seeing all of the Niner games

as well as getting as much Niner news as I do, gives me a little insight here. I agree that Crabtree would make our roster and do well, however his drops would be troubling and could make Brees lose confidence in him eventually. I think Ginn would have trouble replacing Henderson and would be about equally effective in the same role, however his kick and punt return abilities might give him a slight edge in making the final roster.

"Never confuse a single defeat with a final defeat." - F. Scott Fitzgerald

by Cajun in CA on Jan 15, 2012 3:35 PM CST up reply actions  

That’s about how I see it, with the exception of Crabtree’s drops. His career drop percentage is actually lower than Colston’s and Brees still goes to Colston a ton.

"I don’t intend to draw any conclusions from any single game." -Brian Burke
"I will now attempt to exclude specific large amounts of TOP from the totals of winning teams, in order to prove that TOP doesn't contribute to winning." -Dr. Jeremy Arkes

by coldpizza on Jan 15, 2012 4:26 PM CST up reply actions  

I concur Cajun

I live in 49er country as well and i’ve all their games for the last 25 years. if you remove the draft tags and just went by production and talent i agree that none of their wideouts would make our team. why would they? if not for davis do yuo really believe alex smith would have been able to lead a drives for two late TDs throwing to ginn, crabtree, and that rookie? PUH-LEASE!!! I’llbet that nobody not named gore, davis or smith even touched the ball during those final minutes.

by jray2000 on Jan 16, 2012 12:59 AM CST up reply actions  

I meant WRs 3-5 wouldn't make our roster

i will say this, Crabtree wouldn’t beat out Colston

"But tonight the Superbowl belongs to the City of New Orleans" - Roger Goodell 2/7/2010

by SaintBevo on Jan 15, 2012 5:30 PM CST up reply actions  

That’s arguable.

"I don’t intend to draw any conclusions from any single game." -Brian Burke
"I will now attempt to exclude specific large amounts of TOP from the totals of winning teams, in order to prove that TOP doesn't contribute to winning." -Dr. Jeremy Arkes

by coldpizza on Jan 15, 2012 5:44 PM CST up reply actions  

as you have proven over and over again, everything is arguable

"But tonight the Superbowl belongs to the City of New Orleans" - Roger Goodell 2/7/2010

by SaintBevo on Jan 15, 2012 7:33 PM CST up reply actions  

Well, he is a first round talent who is currently starting in the NFL. I would think would open the door to debate in and of itself.

"I don’t intend to draw any conclusions from any single game." -Brian Burke
"I will now attempt to exclude specific large amounts of TOP from the totals of winning teams, in order to prove that TOP doesn't contribute to winning." -Dr. Jeremy Arkes

by coldpizza on Jan 15, 2012 8:13 PM CST up reply actions  

doubt it. here is the stats: a 6’0 215 pound primmadonna that cannot get seperation from decent nfl cbs vs a 6’5 guy that can make plays in double or even triple coverage. hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm

by balaramesh on Jan 17, 2012 12:04 PM CST up reply actions  

4. porter fell waaaaay off. he was a good cb but far from shutdown potential.

5. davis is their only dangerous receiver. crabbtree a solid possesion guy and ginn is still fast. but davis is the ONLY one to gameplan for. However, GW failed to make any adjustments to stop davis.

by balaramesh on Jan 17, 2012 12:09 PM CST up reply actions  

We have a second. It should be 59th overall.

"I don’t intend to draw any conclusions from any single game." -Brian Burke
"I will now attempt to exclude specific large amounts of TOP from the totals of winning teams, in order to prove that TOP doesn't contribute to winning." -Dr. Jeremy Arkes

by coldpizza on Jan 15, 2012 8:14 PM CST up reply actions  

59. Saints
60. Packers
61. lesser CCG loser
62. greater CCG loser
63. SB loser
64. SB champs

"I don’t intend to draw any conclusions from any single game." -Brian Burke
"I will now attempt to exclude specific large amounts of TOP from the totals of winning teams, in order to prove that TOP doesn't contribute to winning." -Dr. Jeremy Arkes

by coldpizza on Jan 15, 2012 8:17 PM CST up reply actions  

I totally agree

Without the defense in the this game it would have been over long before it was. We HAVE to give them credit for that. Offense wasn’t clicking. Too many turnovers. Drew was still pulling for those long yardage throws versus sticking to what was working and didn’t get a real rhythm going until the 4th quarter. After being on the field for so long they were freaking exhausted plus you have to give it up to the 49ers offense in those last moments for calling the right plays.

In the long run though it has become obvious that GW’s style of defense is not working for this team. Bend but don’t break is does not match up with our high octane, hit them in the mouth offense or the mentality of this team. We need a defense that matches that intensity. I welcome a change.

by SarahT on Jan 15, 2012 4:12 PM CST reply actions  

when you blitz more than any defense in the NFL, like we do, you are an aggresive , intense defense

that is quite different from a bend don’t break defense. You cannot be a blitz – oriented defense and also be a "bend don’t break defense ’ That is an oxymoron. They are at opposite ends of the spectrum.

"We've established the run; we've established the pass. Now all we have to establish is another championship!"
"Some say the glass is half empty;
Some say the glass is half full.
I say- 'are you going to finish that beer'?"

by Philinwood on Jan 15, 2012 4:41 PM CST reply actions  

They are at opposite ends of the spectrum.

No, they’re not. The opposite end of the spectrum would either be a defense that consistently forces three and outs, regardless of how they go about it. You don’t necessarily have to be aggressive or intense in order to accomplish that. You merely need to be disciplined and fundamentally sound.

"I don’t intend to draw any conclusions from any single game." -Brian Burke
"I will now attempt to exclude specific large amounts of TOP from the totals of winning teams, in order to prove that TOP doesn't contribute to winning." -Dr. Jeremy Arkes

by coldpizza on Jan 15, 2012 4:56 PM CST up reply actions  

- either

"I don’t intend to draw any conclusions from any single game." -Brian Burke
"I will now attempt to exclude specific large amounts of TOP from the totals of winning teams, in order to prove that TOP doesn't contribute to winning." -Dr. Jeremy Arkes

by coldpizza on Jan 15, 2012 4:57 PM CST up reply actions  

you always act like you know so much about football

and you fool a lot of people. You don’t fool me. A team that blitzes is an aggressive football team. You reasoning is so off. A defense that forces three and outs is a great defense. But you are not going to get that with bend and dont break.,. In this era where everything is skewed towards the passer and the pass reciever, that’s hard to do. But, you realistically can’t be a blitzing defense and have as your MO bend and don’t break. Three and outs- The Purple People Eaters, Steel Curtain, Bears under Buddy/Ryan/Mike Ditka, Mike Singletary, Giants 2007, Eagles defenses several years, Baltimore Ravens last 7 years. You can’t send the house and say we will give up a lot of yards but not give up a big play. No, the true aggressive defense either get pressure with 4 DL guys or blitz ala Jim Johnson etc but they don’t bend and not break. No, would Lawrence taylor or Urlacher, or Butkas, or Ray Lweis say let’s bend? Never.The whole essence of blitzing is risk/reward. You know there are great rewards such as sacks and QB pressure and even throwing RBs for a loss, but the flip side is maybe giving up big plays as there are less pass defenders (or run defenders) because 5-6-7-8) pass rushers are going at the opposing QB.

Bend but don’t break defenses don’t force three and outs. Maybe your experience is in Pop Warnewr, but other than that- name me a defense that’s bend but don’t break but forces 3 and outs regularly. Nada.

"We've established the run; we've established the pass. Now all we have to establish is another championship!"
"Some say the glass is half empty;
Some say the glass is half full.
I say- 'are you going to finish that beer'?"

by Philinwood on Jan 15, 2012 7:09 PM CST up reply actions  

Who said anything about it being their MO? It’s a erroneous label given to the defense by fans, based on results. Williams is blitzing in an attempt to force three and outs and get off the field. More often than not, they haven’t been good enough to accomplish that personnel wise. Eventually, the odds catch up with the opposing offense and a 3rd down stop results. Believe all the hindsight rhetoric you want. There’s no DC at any level of play that goes in saying “we’re going to go into this game giving up huge chunks of real estate, only to toughen up at the last possible moment”.

Bend but don’t break defenses don’t force three and outs.

Thanks for that insight, Captain Obvious. Now, feel free to convince us that the Saints defense gives up yardage by design. They’re simply not good enough to prevent it.

"I don’t intend to draw any conclusions from any single game." -Brian Burke
"I will now attempt to exclude specific large amounts of TOP from the totals of winning teams, in order to prove that TOP doesn't contribute to winning." -Dr. Jeremy Arkes

by coldpizza on Jan 15, 2012 7:40 PM CST up reply actions  

The phrase “bend don’t break” is basically in the same vein as the phrase “dink and dunk” was, prior to the West Coast offense becoming a fad. It’s a extremely brief, vague summary of a shortcoming. The short passing game wasn’t dreamed up by Bill Walsh. It goes all the way back to Ollie Matson, Lenny Moore and beyond. It’s a compensatory measure used to exploit aggressive defenses. In the case of a non-great defense blitzing, it’s a compensatory measure used to disrupt aggressive offenses. That compensation isn’t necessary, if your defense is more fundamentally sound. Granted, it doesn’t hurt either. That’s why the best of the best often blitzed relentlessly. They were sound enough fundamentally to weather the risk side of risk/reward. There have been many. many other very solid, less “flashy” defenses that have got that done without a lot of blitzing, however. Just look at the leaders in fewest yards given up from year to year. There are plenty that won’t strike you as overly aggressive.

"I don’t intend to draw any conclusions from any single game." -Brian Burke
"I will now attempt to exclude specific large amounts of TOP from the totals of winning teams, in order to prove that TOP doesn't contribute to winning." -Dr. Jeremy Arkes

by coldpizza on Jan 15, 2012 7:59 PM CST up reply actions  

It’s a erroneous label given to the defense by fans, based on results.

Erroneous isn’t the word I was looking for. Observational, I suppose.

"I don’t intend to draw any conclusions from any single game." -Brian Burke
"I will now attempt to exclude specific large amounts of TOP from the totals of winning teams, in order to prove that TOP doesn't contribute to winning." -Dr. Jeremy Arkes

by coldpizza on Jan 15, 2012 8:02 PM CST up reply actions  

The whole essence of blitzing is risk/reward.

a.) No one’s questioning this.
b.) It doesn’t have anything to do with bend don’t break, as you pointed out.

They’d be a highly malleable defense, whether they’re blitzing or not.

"I don’t intend to draw any conclusions from any single game." -Brian Burke
"I will now attempt to exclude specific large amounts of TOP from the totals of winning teams, in order to prove that TOP doesn't contribute to winning." -Dr. Jeremy Arkes

by coldpizza on Jan 15, 2012 7:43 PM CST up reply actions  

In this era where everything is skewed towards the passer and the pass reciever, that’s hard to do.

It’s been hard to do throughout the history of the game. And when we’re talking about yardage surrendered, we certainly aren’t talking about strictly pass defense, so you can stop using rule changes as your crutch.

"I don’t intend to draw any conclusions from any single game." -Brian Burke
"I will now attempt to exclude specific large amounts of TOP from the totals of winning teams, in order to prove that TOP doesn't contribute to winning." -Dr. Jeremy Arkes

by coldpizza on Jan 15, 2012 7:47 PM CST up reply actions  

Team sport

Football is a team sport, so can only blame this loss on the team, not an individual(s). A chain is only as strong as its weakest link…same is true about the team. Need to find the weak links and get them improved/fixed, if we want to make a run next year…

by WhoDatUpInYa on Jan 15, 2012 4:58 PM CST reply actions  

In defense of Jason David, he led the Saints in INTs both seasons he played for us and was an excellent special teams player. That doesn’t mean I want him in my starting lineup going forth.

"I don’t intend to draw any conclusions from any single game." -Brian Burke
"I will now attempt to exclude specific large amounts of TOP from the totals of winning teams, in order to prove that TOP doesn't contribute to winning." -Dr. Jeremy Arkes

by coldpizza on Jan 15, 2012 5:02 PM CST reply actions  

jason david was God awful. outside of kareem jackson, he had the worst season of any NFL db the past 20 years.

by balaramesh on Jan 17, 2012 12:02 PM CST up reply actions  

Dave, I also think you’re putting a little bit too much weight on this particular game. Most people who want to see Harper and/or Williams gone didn’t arrive at that decision based entirely on what transpired yesterday. I mean, Kevin Kaesviharn had four tackles, an assist and an interception against the 49ers in 2008. He was also burnt countless times in coverage and was an overall liability at his position. As I’ve said several times before, if you wish to champion Harper’s play making ability as a blitzer, fine. Use him situationally. Bulk him up and convert him into a poor man’s Thomas Davis or Mark Fields. There’s no reason he needs to be on the field as often as he is at SS. He doesn’t bring enough to the position on an every down basis to justify that level of utilization. A ton of tackles? Hoorah. Jay Bellamy had a ton of tackles, too. All that says is our front seven isn’t doing their job in bringing down the ball carrier.

"I don’t intend to draw any conclusions from any single game." -Brian Burke
"I will now attempt to exclude specific large amounts of TOP from the totals of winning teams, in order to prove that TOP doesn't contribute to winning." -Dr. Jeremy Arkes

by coldpizza on Jan 15, 2012 5:20 PM CST reply actions  

on this we agree....

“He doesn’t bring enough to the position on an every down basis”

“All that says is our front seven isn’t doing their job in bringing down the ball carrier.”

by jray2000 on Jan 16, 2012 1:06 AM CST up reply actions  

Dave, if tjis coldpizza post irks you don't feel alone

this is a guy who says he is not really a Saints fan anymore, he’s a Saints rooter. What does that mean? He has dissed just about every Saints player from Archie Manning, to Mario Bates to Jon Vilma, Roman Harper, Colston, Harper, the list goes on and on. He knows how to stay just under the standards to not ghet banned. I am hopeful that
he posts something that makes you have to ban him. He’s a perfect example of someone with a little knowledge and a negative attitude who can just tunr ofss tens, hundreds, maybe even thousands. As much as I agree with you banning, Stu, I would much rather have Stu on this blog. There are so many here that wish coldpizza would go elsewhere. I hope he does. He’s miserable, negative and arrogant.

"We've established the run; we've established the pass. Now all we have to establish is another championship!"
"Some say the glass is half empty;
Some say the glass is half full.
I say- 'are you going to finish that beer'?"

by Philinwood on Jan 15, 2012 7:22 PM CST reply actions  

Will Dave ban you for being a sheep? You’ve never seen me “diss” any of those players. I have given my honest opinion of them. If that’s your definition of disrespect, what about the countless people on this site that have “dissed” Jason David and Aaron Brooks? Were they any less Saints the ones you mentioned? Of course not. You just happen to have a negative opinion of them, based on whatever the reasoning. I honestly can’t remember saying anything overly negative about Bates or Vilma. Did I speak badly of Roman Harper twice, btw? Or did I “diss” Rhoda (as played by Valerie Harper) in my sleep? You mentioned two Harpers. Color me perplexed. In any case, I’d like you to tone down on the personal attacks. None of these players are members of this community. I am. As such, you’re currently in violation of CSC rules.

"I don’t intend to draw any conclusions from any single game." -Brian Burke
"I will now attempt to exclude specific large amounts of TOP from the totals of winning teams, in order to prove that TOP doesn't contribute to winning." -Dr. Jeremy Arkes

by coldpizza on Jan 15, 2012 8:09 PM CST up reply actions  

There is a block feature on SB Nation...
this is a guy who says he is not really a Saints fan anymore, he’s a Saints rooter. What does that mean?

It means that, as of myself, he ain’t blind enough to turn his head away on any Saints stupid decisions, from management to coaching. Did you notice that he rarely, if not at all, criticize the play of those actually wearing a jersey? Except for Harper. And that’s well deserved. Don’t know about you but, considering the insane fire power we got, it should have turned up as a much better play-offs record since the PayLooDrew era…

Repeat? Run it!

by FrenchFreak on Jan 15, 2012 8:15 PM CST up reply actions  

Actually, it means that I don’t regularly attend home games anymore, since I moved. I consider a “fan” someone that supports the team monetarily. A “rooter” is anyone else with a rooting interest in said team. Define it however you like. That’s simply how I view it.

"I don’t intend to draw any conclusions from any single game." -Brian Burke
"I will now attempt to exclude specific large amounts of TOP from the totals of winning teams, in order to prove that TOP doesn't contribute to winning." -Dr. Jeremy Arkes

by coldpizza on Jan 15, 2012 8:20 PM CST up reply actions  

That's a tough one...
Define it however you like.

If I’m buying Saints gear, which ends up costing me double the price because of custom taxes, but still call out everything I see about the Saints that I dislike, am I a rooter, a fan or very stupid to not take an hour and a half drive and shop in Burlington to avoid being s***d?

Repeat? Run it!

by FrenchFreak on Jan 15, 2012 8:37 PM CST up reply actions  

I’ve considered that. You’d actually have to spend 32 times the cost of a season ticket each calendar year on official NFL merchandise, in order for it to work out the same. It wouldn’t really matter which team though, as it’s all shared revenue. Technically you’re still screwing Benson out of parking and concessions, but I did that, even when I was attending games. Usually bought a 20 oz Coke for $3 and parked for free under the Claiborne overpass. Not really enough of a contribution to make a dent, regardless. Hats off to Dave and anyone else who can afford the rich b**** seats, porterhouses smothered in queso, white gloved Superdome valets, etc.

"I don’t intend to draw any conclusions from any single game." -Brian Burke
"I will now attempt to exclude specific large amounts of TOP from the totals of winning teams, in order to prove that TOP doesn't contribute to winning." -Dr. Jeremy Arkes

by coldpizza on Jan 15, 2012 8:46 PM CST up reply actions  

And I usually bought NFL merchandise myself, so tack that match on.

"I don’t intend to draw any conclusions from any single game." -Brian Burke
"I will now attempt to exclude specific large amounts of TOP from the totals of winning teams, in order to prove that TOP doesn't contribute to winning." -Dr. Jeremy Arkes

by coldpizza on Jan 15, 2012 8:48 PM CST up reply actions  

Speaking your mind doesn’t have anything to do with fandom. As long as Benson’s getting his guaranteed duckies, he’d be perfectly content with having the Saints play to an empty Dome each Sunday. Out-of-towners like me and you typically don’t matter. They’ll never come out and admit that due to the bad PR and lost merchandise sales it would generate, but you’re fooling yourself, if you think we’re the life blood of the team. Real talk.

"I don’t intend to draw any conclusions from any single game." -Brian Burke
"I will now attempt to exclude specific large amounts of TOP from the totals of winning teams, in order to prove that TOP doesn't contribute to winning." -Dr. Jeremy Arkes

by coldpizza on Jan 15, 2012 8:57 PM CST up reply actions  

Oh well...
but you’re fooling yourself, if you think we’re the life blood of the team.

There goes my last piece of innocence.

Repeat? Run it!

by FrenchFreak on Jan 15, 2012 9:14 PM CST up reply actions  

Good point on the playoff record, though. If you weigh it out:

5 points for a SB win (vs Colts).
4 point for an NFCCG win (vs Vikings).
3 points each for two divisional round wins (vs Eagles, Cardinals).
2 points for a wild card round win (vs Lions).
1 point for a one-and-done appearance (vs Seahawks).

That works out to 18 pts over 6 seasons, or 3.0 quality points per season.
How do you think that would stack up against the other 31 teams over that same 2006-11 stretch?
I’ll wait until after the Super Bowl, then I will calculate that.

"I don’t intend to draw any conclusions from any single game." -Brian Burke
"I will now attempt to exclude specific large amounts of TOP from the totals of winning teams, in order to prove that TOP doesn't contribute to winning." -Dr. Jeremy Arkes

by coldpizza on Jan 15, 2012 8:39 PM CST up reply actions  

so 2 divisional round wins > Super Bowl win?

SB and CG wins should count for more imo

"But tonight the Superbowl belongs to the City of New Orleans" - Roger Goodell 2/7/2010

by SaintBevo on Jan 15, 2012 10:30 PM CST up reply actions  

No. A Super Bowl win is technically worth 12 or 14 points. You’re already getting credit for all the games leading up to it.

"I don’t intend to draw any conclusions from any single game." -Brian Burke
"I will now attempt to exclude specific large amounts of TOP from the totals of winning teams, in order to prove that TOP doesn't contribute to winning." -Dr. Jeremy Arkes

by coldpizza on Jan 16, 2012 12:00 AM CST up reply actions  

ok - i gotcha

I can get behind that. So in 2009, do we get points for earning the bye? Otherwise, a wildcard team winning the Super Bowl would get more points than a team that went undefeated.

Let the arbitrary comparisons begin!

"But tonight the Superbowl belongs to the City of New Orleans" - Roger Goodell 2/7/2010

by SaintBevo on Jan 16, 2012 12:06 AM CST up reply actions  

FrenchFreak’s point of contention was/is our success in the playoffs under Payton. As such, the weighting would be to determine success in the post season, not necessarily overall success. In that light, 16-0 vs 7-9 doesn’t really mean anything once you reach the playoffs. Everyone is one loss away from not advancing. I plan on including all 32 teams though, so there needs to be something to differentiate between qualifiers and non-qualifiers. That’s where the one-and-done point comes in. In essence, those are the “didn’t do jack in the playoffs, but at least they made it” teams.

"I don’t intend to draw any conclusions from any single game." -Brian Burke
"I will now attempt to exclude specific large amounts of TOP from the totals of winning teams, in order to prove that TOP doesn't contribute to winning." -Dr. Jeremy Arkes

by coldpizza on Jan 16, 2012 3:07 AM CST up reply actions  

It truly would be unfair to do it any other way. The 16-1 Patriots weren’t more successful than the 14-6 Packers of last season. They didn’t attain the primary goal they set out to attain.

"I don’t intend to draw any conclusions from any single game." -Brian Burke
"I will now attempt to exclude specific large amounts of TOP from the totals of winning teams, in order to prove that TOP doesn't contribute to winning." -Dr. Jeremy Arkes

by coldpizza on Jan 16, 2012 3:11 AM CST up reply actions  

  • 18-1 Patriots

"I don’t intend to draw any conclusions from any single game." -Brian Burke
"I will now attempt to exclude specific large amounts of TOP from the totals of winning teams, in order to prove that TOP doesn't contribute to winning." -Dr. Jeremy Arkes

by coldpizza on Jan 16, 2012 3:12 AM CST up reply actions  

no, but

The 16-3 Super Bowl Saints could be considered a more successful team than the 14-6 Packers by the virtue of their being dominant in the regular season AND winning a championship. If you’re only measuring postseason success, i get it but it seems to me that, all things being equal, you’d rather have a season like we did in 2009-10

"But tonight the Superbowl belongs to the City of New Orleans" - Roger Goodell 2/7/2010

by SaintBevo on Jan 16, 2012 9:36 AM CST up reply actions  

Being dominant in the regular season earned them a bye, which in turn put them within one win of collecting 3 points, two wins of collecting 7 and three wins of collecting 12. Green Bay could only reach 9 cumulative points by winning three. They would be required to win a fourth (the Super Bowl), in order to exceed 12. In overcoming that handicap, they were slightly more successful in the 2010 postseason than the Saints were in the 2009 postseason. I understand the opposing logic. The Packers didn’t win their division, so they’re in a position to gain more points. While that’s true, it’s also more difficult for them to reach that level. They’re facing another playoff caliber team, whereas the Saints (or any other team with a superior regular season record) may have racked up those extra wins against cupcakes. Not that that has anything to do with the postseason. I’m just explaining the built in demerit.

If you’re only measuring postseason success, i get it

Kudos.

"I don’t intend to draw any conclusions from any single game." -Brian Burke
"I will now attempt to exclude specific large amounts of TOP from the totals of winning teams, in order to prove that TOP doesn't contribute to winning." -Dr. Jeremy Arkes

by coldpizza on Jan 16, 2012 11:54 AM CST up reply actions  

I totally disagree with you Phillinwood

I like reading CP’s posts, which sometimes are argumentative, occasionally petty, and 100% within his rights to voice his opinion here. You don’t have to read them, I don’t read Preston Gary’s posts because I choose not to. It’s a free country and everyone is entitled to have their own opinions and speak them through forums such as these.

"Never confuse a single defeat with a final defeat." - F. Scott Fitzgerald

by Cajun in CA on Jan 15, 2012 11:17 PM CST up reply actions  

turn off tens, hundres, etc

"We've established the run; we've established the pass. Now all we have to establish is another championship!"
"Some say the glass is half empty;
Some say the glass is half full.
I say- 'are you going to finish that beer'?"

by Philinwood on Jan 15, 2012 7:23 PM CST reply actions  

Notes

1) Williams defense depend on lots of blitzes for pressure. Upgrading the D-Line and Linebackers would give that pressure without so many blitzes. Our secondary is often playing on an island, misleading us into thinking they get burned too often.
2) We’re now making the playoff every season. That gives us a Super Bowl shot every season. I’ll take that
3) It’s time to sit back, cool down, and let a little time pass before the team starts making decisions for the future. No knee jerk reactions, please.
4) Signing Drew Brees is a no brainer in the offseason and top priority.
5) Looking forward to starting it all over again when the draft comes around. The Saints are now an enjoyable and rewarding team to follow. Have some perspective. Things could be a lot worse.

by eric d on Jan 15, 2012 11:52 PM CST reply actions  

This

The Saints are now an enjoyable and rewarding team to follow. Have some perspective. Things could be a lot worse.

Easy to forget, especially if you’re younger than 35, that we sucked for so long. Rather be arguing about this than about who to pick with the 4th pick and whether our head coach should be gone or given another year.

"But tonight the Superbowl belongs to the City of New Orleans" - Roger Goodell 2/7/2010

by SaintBevo on Jan 16, 2012 12:03 AM CST up reply actions  

I’m not calling for G.W.s head but I am calling for his job. He knew the personnel that he had. However even knowing this he stubbornly kept to a system that they would be unable to play it effectively.

I’ll just focus on the last two drives. There is no way that you let the niners have man coverage. Just plain and simple. I would have very much liked our chances had we just played pass defenses, yes sell out to the pass.

I keep thinking of the word 'magical,' " he said. "When you think about the relationship between the Saints and the Gulf Coast and the city of New Orleans, it was more than just a football game and more than just a football team. The hopes, the dreams and the struggles of that community were all reflected in that football team. It was a great night for the people in New Orleans and the Gulf Coast region-Roger Goodell

by Daniel P on Jan 16, 2012 12:33 AM CST reply actions  

Agreed. Philinwood said blitzing was risk/reward. Well, if you’re GW, where’s the risk? The reward is a fat cash bonus, if what you’re trying works and you win the SB. Conversely, the risk should be losing your job for failing to turn sh** into chocolate pudding by gambling with a riskier MO.

"I don’t intend to draw any conclusions from any single game." -Brian Burke
"I will now attempt to exclude specific large amounts of TOP from the totals of winning teams, in order to prove that TOP doesn't contribute to winning." -Dr. Jeremy Arkes

by coldpizza on Jan 16, 2012 3:16 AM CST up reply actions  

What you have to keep in mind is, budget wasn’t good enough to get Williams here in the first place. He demanded more and Payton had to make personal concessions in order to make that happen. I’m just saying, it’s not like GW met Benson half way or did anyone any favors. He got paid handsomely throughout his contract and only delivered in one of those three seasons. That being last season. I’m not even talking about the fluky rash of takeaways — a small sample in New Orleans, but none of his defenses have ever collected nearly that many — and Super Bowl win. Yards given up should be what he’s evaluated upon and in that department, he’s been playing the role of a less conservative Gary Gibbs for two of the past three seasons. He deserves no brownie points for rolling the dice in order to achieve results. Only for achieving results.

"I don’t intend to draw any conclusions from any single game." -Brian Burke
"I will now attempt to exclude specific large amounts of TOP from the totals of winning teams, in order to prove that TOP doesn't contribute to winning." -Dr. Jeremy Arkes

by coldpizza on Jan 16, 2012 3:24 AM CST up reply actions  

GW does NOT make adjustments throughout the game. He had no effective gameplan for vernon davis or megatron. Granted both are elite nfl athletes. But he could have at least tried anything to limit their effectiveness. Megatron easily went for 200 yards receiving, and Davis could have done the same. I would rather them double someone and leave a lesser option option.

by balaramesh on Jan 17, 2012 12:00 PM CST up reply actions  

Someone made a good point about Talent versus Coaching.

The talent is definitely lacking. Vilma is aging and injured, Shanle is old, Dunbar is somewhat clueless, Smith is aging and slowing, Jordan was disappointing, Franklin and Rogers were invisible, and Ellis took a step back. Greer was pretty good. Harper was horrible in coverage and good at the things he does. Jenkins took a huge step back from being second team all pro last season. Everyone can say that they’re ok with him, but he took a huge step back and may not be instinctive enough to play Free Safety. Porter was bad.

The issue that I have is that even though there is a lack of talent, it is the coaches job to know the strengths and weaknesses of his players. Putting Shanle into coverage on a receiver is not a strength, so why have a scheme where he has to do that? That is a failing of the coaches to put their players in positions where they can succeed just to fulfill whatever identity that the coaches want to have.

by cpranger on Jan 16, 2012 6:29 AM CST reply actions  

The money on the Saints is on the offensive side of the line.

And will be for the foreseeable future. If you’re lacking talent, then you try to compensate with a scheme. GW’s is one of the most complex in the league. 2nd in blitz, 1st in 3-8 (one of the reasons he wanted Jordan so much). With so many defensive-side newcomers this year and the lockout, it is not surprising (to me) that it took a long time for this defense to gel, but we are seeing better contributions from the rookies and 2nd-year guys. And guess what? if GW leaves, we’ll be starting this all over again.

by Ship on Jan 16, 2012 12:24 PM CST reply actions  

D has sucked since before Williams and after

2009 was an emotional year and players were playing for more than a ring and we had veterans to help out some of the youngsters, so the D appeared better than they were with the help of the Offense. The D gave up big plays then and it has only gotten worse. I love the Saints and always will, but we will never be an Elite team that is mentioned with the Pats, Colts, 49ers and Cowboys of old until we get a D – we need balance. Hoping we get it next year.

by meitze on Jan 16, 2012 2:17 PM CST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

The ultimate community for lovers of all things Black and Gold! The latest news, commentary, discussion, linkage and more! Join in the conversation now with all of your fellow Who Dats!

Featured Poll

Poll
How much do you think Drew Brees is worth per year? (avg. over life of contract)
Less than $17M
152 votes
$17M
52 votes
$18M
136 votes
$19M
183 votes
$20M
575 votes
$21M
212 votes
$22M
98 votes
$23M
523 votes

1931 votes | Poll has closed

Twitter-logo_medium


Head Coach

Erindavewhodat_small Dave Cariello

Assistant Coach (Editor/Contributor)

13088_f520_small David "Satch" Kelly

0113wbphillips_small Hans Petersen

Offensive Coordinators (Contributors)

Saintslogo_small Andrew Juge

Titans_small Jack Sharkey

316807_10150333101899753_504374752_8049350_806276562_n_small Alex Swift

Squat_small Preston J. Gary, Jr.

100media36imag0036_small Travis Dauro

Vgfl_logo_small_small Adesola Badon

Small Jimmy Angel

Small Jordan Katz

Small Win Ellington

Super-bowl-44_small Wallace Delery

Thomas_photo_small Thomas Hukel

Angrywhodat-saints-gold-50pct-bright-grey-outline_small_small The Angry Who Dat