Saints 2012 Regular Season Opponents Announced
The NFL has released the 2012 regular season opponents list for all 32 teams in the league. Below are the opponents the Saints will face both home and away next season. The NFC South teams will face all AFC West and all NFC East teams during the 2012 season.
Home: Atlanta Falcons, Carolina Panthers, Tampa Bay Buccaneers, Philadelphia Eagles, Washington Redskins, San Francisco 49ers, Kansas City Chiefs, San Diego Chargers
Away: Atlanta Falcons, Carolina Panthers, Tampa Bay Buccaneers, Dallas Cowboys, New York Giants, Green Bay Packers, Denver Broncos, Oakland Raiders
125 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
will probably be 49ers for first game of year
After we win Superbowl
"So I'll leave you with this. And I say this with all sincerity, right from the bottom of my heart, and with all due respect: Lick my balls." Grandmaster Wang
by DrWhoDat on Jan 2, 2012 12:51 PM CST reply actions 3 recs
I wouldn't mind this
It would give us additional opportunity to prove we really should have been the #2 seed by beating them up AGAIN. (Assuming of course we pull it off the first time, but even in Candlestick we flat out should…)
A lot of west coast travel…and didn’t we play Green Bay away this year, maybe twice?
Duh!
by devilducky on Jan 2, 2012 12:54 PM CST via mobile reply actions
I meant west traveling to us.
Duh!
by devilducky on Jan 2, 2012 12:56 PM CST via mobile up reply actions
“This” year (though technically it’s already last year both in calendar and regular-season considerations) we played GB because of the divisional rotation. Next year we’ll play them because we both won our divisions.
In theory, they could play at us in 2013 were we both to end up with the same in-division rankings yet again.
Why do you need a link?
There is none.
Wanna say something? Sign up! It's free!
by Dave Cariello on Jan 2, 2012 1:10 PM CST up reply actions
So I could see who other teams were playing if it also linked those
Being lazy here Dave, just go with it, jeez.
Ahhh...
Wanna say something? Sign up! It's free!
by Dave Cariello on Jan 2, 2012 1:29 PM CST up reply actions
If Dave had a nickle for every time he's heard this:
Being lazy here Dave, just go with it, jeez.
LOL
Every day I'm shufflin'!
by Just 'Nother Day on Jan 2, 2012 2:41 PM CST up reply actions
Honestly I was hoping it would also link to other teams like the Cowboys and Denver
So I could send them to my friends.
14-2
Giants & Pack on the road…..
Member of the WHO DAT NATION!
Another SAINTS fan in Panther country!
GEAUX SAINTS!!!!!
We own the giants. More likely to have a division rival loss. Carolina maybe?
In Breesus' name we play
by Breesus Christ Superstar on Jan 2, 2012 10:13 PM CST via mobile up reply actions
Can anybody else say
Cake?
Mark Ingram-OROY
Cam Jordan-DROY
New Orleans Saints-2012 Super Bowl Champs
TOP IS GAWD!
Pre-pre-pre-preliminary prediction...
High-end we’re looking at 15-1.
Worst case scenario (not involving alien abductions) is 10-6.
"Gowin on fourth and 14 will punt it away. He hangs it very high, angling it for the near sideline...HAKIM DROPS THE BALL!!! HAKIM DROPS THE BALL!! Brian Milne might've fallen on it at the ten yard line! It's the New Orleans Saints' football! Brian Milne, the most unlikely hero of them all, falls on the fumble, the muff by Hakim! There is a God after all!" -- Jim Henderson
by hakimdropstheball on Jan 2, 2012 1:40 PM CST reply actions
Ouch....
10-6 would be disappointing, no?
Member of the WHO DAT NATION!
Another SAINTS fan in Panther country!
GEAUX SAINTS!!!!!
by SAINTSfaninNC on Jan 2, 2012 1:47 PM CST up reply actions
Compare that to our expectations 5-6 years ago.
This isn't about rules, it's about manners. Now there's no rule that says that I cant come over here and fart on your entree. But I don't do it. Why? Because it's not good manners.
Not a disappointment
10-6 should mean playoffs. Playoffs are my starting expectation now.
"Gowin on fourth and 14 will punt it away. He hangs it very high, angling it for the near sideline...HAKIM DROPS THE BALL!!! HAKIM DROPS THE BALL!! Brian Milne might've fallen on it at the ten yard line! It's the New Orleans Saints' football! Brian Milne, the most unlikely hero of them all, falls on the fumble, the muff by Hakim! There is a God after all!" -- Jim Henderson
by hakimdropstheball on Jan 2, 2012 2:38 PM CST via mobile up reply actions
I guess after the last couple of years...
10-6 just doesn’t appeal to me…….
Member of the WHO DAT NATION!
Another SAINTS fan in Panther country!
GEAUX SAINTS!!!!!
by SAINTSfaninNC on Jan 2, 2012 3:14 PM CST up reply actions
Hot Damn, We get to dump Dallas again !!!!!!
I’m in Hog Heaven. This will be on my mind every day untill we get there. This gives me a whole off season to really get under their skin. This is GREAT !!!!
My Magnificent Black and Gold Warriors
I'll be there!!
And Phil might come too. And the girlfriend might want to come, but she had a great time at the hotel in NOLA.
It’s not the size of your TOP, it’s how you use it!
Want scientific proof? Read this paper by Dr. Jeremy Arkes.
by Dan Kelly on Jan 3, 2012 11:35 PM CST via Android app up reply actions
You guys (and girls) are FANTASTIC!!
Any big fans of Big Fan out there?
“There’s NO WAY they lose with us in the parking lot!!”
“15-1.”
“Totally realistic.”
And I love you ALL!!
I just had a rap with Santa and we took us a little stroll
And all I want for Christmas is the Saints in the Super Bowl
Hans, You kinda alright too. Long as you continue taking your meds................
My Magnificent Black and Gold Warriors
meds? (smacks forehead!)
I knew there was something I’ve been forgetting lately!!
I just had a rap with Santa and we took us a little stroll
And all I want for Christmas is the Saints in the Super Bowl
by Hans Petersen on Jan 2, 2012 3:42 PM CST up reply actions
put them by your jack daniels
that way you remember them every morning at breakfast
--- I don't miss the alcohol as much as I miss having the built in reason on why I'm nekkid in public.
--- I used to want to be an inspiration to my son. now i just hope to be a dire warning.
--- just two men and a dog making candles
--- I know i'll win my battles though i fear we'll lose the war
--- if you find yourself in a fair fight you failed in planning.
Another great schedule like this year...
depending on when the away games are scheduled, we are looking at 2 to 4 cold weather games, GB,NY, @DEN and maybe @CAR
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qais_eGMnWk
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=39GH-nzrY_I&feature=relatde
NY can be in the 50's in the winter:
went to the 2006 on Christmas Eve, dressed for cold freezing weather & had to remove most of the outer clothes as it was about 55 degrees out that day. Will be making plans to go to that game with the hubby & daughter!
LOVING MOORE, GRAHAM AND THE COOL BREES!
by N_O_1saintfan on Jan 2, 2012 3:09 PM CST up reply actions
I dont think that will apply this next go round.......................
I do see Us playing the Pack on a Sunday or Monday Nite ball game though.
My Magnificent Black and Gold Warriors
shoulda used that sarcasm font. here see if this helps
SB hangover is gonna cost us Two
Drew Brees....MVP Saint! Who Dat!!!
by cajuncommando58 on Jan 2, 2012 2:57 PM CST up reply actions
Strange we are the home team against The Chargers, We played them in Londan Last time, and we were the home team.
I wanted them to play out here, I live in LA. I could have driven down! but NOOOO! they play at home lol
I read something about the league just changing the "west coast" scheduling format to try and save teams from excessive travel
and that’s why we have SD at home (again) when we should have had to play them in SD
I just had a rap with Santa and we took us a little stroll
And all I want for Christmas is the Saints in the Super Bowl
by Hans Petersen on Jan 2, 2012 3:47 PM CST up reply actions
DAMN!!!
I already had plans to go to the game in San Diego :-(
Eat, drink, and be merry, for tomorrow we die!
WHO DAT?!
TWO DAT!!
by LA_No1_SaintFan on Jan 2, 2012 4:04 PM CST up reply actions
Weak road schedule, as far as desirable points of interest go. The only worthwhile trip would be to San Francisco, with a five hour pit stop in Oakland for the game itself.
"I don’t intend to draw any conclusions from any single game." -Brian Burke
"I will now attempt to exclude specific large amounts of TOP from the totals of winning teams, in order to prove that TOP doesn't contribute to winning." -Dr. Jeremy Arkes
Maybe Denver, if it’s late in the season and worked around a skiing trip.
"I don’t intend to draw any conclusions from any single game." -Brian Burke
"I will now attempt to exclude specific large amounts of TOP from the totals of winning teams, in order to prove that TOP doesn't contribute to winning." -Dr. Jeremy Arkes
See, now you're just baiting him.
This isn't about rules, it's about manners. Now there's no rule that says that I cant come over here and fart on your entree. But I don't do it. Why? Because it's not good manners.
I fear I may be too old for those. :D
"I don’t intend to draw any conclusions from any single game." -Brian Burke
"I will now attempt to exclude specific large amounts of TOP from the totals of winning teams, in order to prove that TOP doesn't contribute to winning." -Dr. Jeremy Arkes
are you saying Oakland's a pit?
or just that you’ll be getting your tires changed, fuel tank filled up, and windshield wiped while there?
I just had a rap with Santa and we took us a little stroll
And all I want for Christmas is the Saints in the Super Bowl
by Hans Petersen on Jan 2, 2012 3:48 PM CST up reply actions
Meh
San Francisco is over-rated. I suppose it was just watered down for me because I lived there and had to deal with the traffic everyday. Traffic isn’t worse anywhere, I promise.
by crescendo2020 on Jan 3, 2012 1:40 AM CST up reply actions
Brees and Sproles are going to want to drop 50 on San Diego
"I want to hand this trophy to the MVP of the Super Bowl -- and the MVP of the entire league.''
-- Saints coach Sean Payton, handing the Vince Lombardi Trophy to Drew Brees after Super Bowl 44.
Oh Yeah, bet that game will be a prime time game
LOVING MOORE, GRAHAM AND THE COOL BREES!
by N_O_1saintfan on Jan 2, 2012 3:11 PM CST up reply actions
If the Packers win the Super Bowl this year
I wonder if they’d go with the same Saints at Packers opener next season. Great matchup, even if it isn’t a rematch of this year’s NFC Championship game. I just think the rest of the nation would be sick of seeing these two teams go at it. Especially if it IS a rematch of Jan 22nd.
"I don’t intend to draw any conclusions from any single game." -Brian Burke
"I will now attempt to exclude specific large amounts of TOP from the totals of winning teams, in order to prove that TOP doesn't contribute to winning." -Dr. Jeremy Arkes
That would be like the Vikings at Saints to open last season, had the 2009 opener also been Vikings at Saints. Kind of overkill, from an objective point of view.
"I don’t intend to draw any conclusions from any single game." -Brian Burke
"I will now attempt to exclude specific large amounts of TOP from the totals of winning teams, in order to prove that TOP doesn't contribute to winning." -Dr. Jeremy Arkes
Not going to think about that at all cause the SAINTS are winning the SB this year....
Eat, drink, and be merry, for tomorrow we die!
WHO DAT?!
TWO DAT!!
by LA_No1_SaintFan on Jan 2, 2012 4:05 PM CST up reply actions
It’s admirable to have blind faith. That doesn’t change the fact that they’ll have win at least one playoff game on an opponent’s home turf for the first time in franchise history, for that to occur.
"I don’t intend to draw any conclusions from any single game." -Brian Burke
"I will now attempt to exclude specific large amounts of TOP from the totals of winning teams, in order to prove that TOP doesn't contribute to winning." -Dr. Jeremy Arkes
First time for everything.
Not that long ago, we’d never won a playoff game, period.
This isn't about rules, it's about manners. Now there's no rule that says that I cant come over here and fart on your entree. But I don't do it. Why? Because it's not good manners.
Oh, it’s entirely possible. I’m just saying it’s not a given. Our track record under Payton against very good teams on the road isn’t anything to write home about. The potential matchup with San Francisco has all the makings of a dogfight. Of course, the first thing most people will say is that the 49ers didn’t play anyone in the NFC West. Trouble is, the same thing could be said last year and they didn’t finish 13-3. They’re vastly improved on both offense and defense. The Saints have regressed on defense, while getting better in the running game and are making better use of the TE. Otherwise, you’re looking at pretty much the same team that barely beat the 49ers in San Francisco in the 2nd game of the season last year. If it transpires, I don’t see that being a cakewalk game in the least. They’re going to have to at least attempt to mix it up against them on offense and we all know how easily Payton has abandoned the running game in the past. Do that against the 49ers on the road and you’re basically conceding their greatest strength. That leaves Aldon Smith free to pin his ears back. Not to mention our struggles against the run lately. If Stewart can knife through our front seven with relative ease, Gore should be able to come close to that level of success.
And that’s not even taking the game at hand into account. I don’t expect the Saints to lose at home, but you can’t rightly expect Brees to have a much more solid game than Matt Flynn just had and that game was nip and tuck throughout. The bottom line being that the playoffs are a whole new ball of wax and it’s fairly uncommon for there not to be at least one team in the Super Bowl that few predicted would make it. With any luck, that team will reign from the AFC, but you never know.
"I don’t intend to draw any conclusions from any single game." -Brian Burke
"I will now attempt to exclude specific large amounts of TOP from the totals of winning teams, in order to prove that TOP doesn't contribute to winning." -Dr. Jeremy Arkes
I know what you're saying about the run defense.
And even taking the 29-yarder out of the equation, we’re still talking about 6-plus YPC for Stewart. Not great (for us). On the other hand, that’s not really how GW built his defense. We’ve done a pretty good job against the run in the last half of the season, largely because we made the other guy abandon the run. No point running the ball when you’re 3 scores down in the fourth, and that’s when most running backs do their damage. We’ve beaten some decent teams doing that this season.
Will this be an uphill struggle if (when) we have to go on the road? Probably. But they’ve given us reason for optimism, I think.
This isn't about rules, it's about manners. Now there's no rule that says that I cant come over here and fart on your entree. But I don't do it. Why? Because it's not good manners.
The inherent flaw in that ideology is that large leads aren’t always established. The Rams game is a prime example of that. Of course, they did virtually nothing to establish the run against the Rams. Hence, my point of not giving in to the temptation of forcing a shootout that will probably never see the light of day otherwise.
"I don’t intend to draw any conclusions from any single game." -Brian Burke
"I will now attempt to exclude specific large amounts of TOP from the totals of winning teams, in order to prove that TOP doesn't contribute to winning." -Dr. Jeremy Arkes
Not like AJ Feeley is the guy that beat us. He was basically just the Rams QB at the time. Steven Jackson is the guy who beat us.
"I don’t intend to draw any conclusions from any single game." -Brian Burke
"I will now attempt to exclude specific large amounts of TOP from the totals of winning teams, in order to prove that TOP doesn't contribute to winning." -Dr. Jeremy Arkes
Honestly, I feel we beat ourselves pretty badly in that game.
The offense came out with no spark, and the D just didn’t come out. We got hit in the mouth early and never bothered to get up for the remainder of the game. They didn’t have to play all that much better to equal or better the level at which we were playing. We’ve played on a higher level pretty consistently since that game. Do you think that there is any way that team would have been on the field with us the way we’ve played for the last five to six games?
But you’re right. If we don’t come out and establish our offense early, we could be in for a long game, at home or away.
This isn't about rules, it's about manners. Now there's no rule that says that I cant come over here and fart on your entree. But I don't do it. Why? Because it's not good manners.
Do you think that there is any way that team would have been on the field with us the way we’ve played for the last five to six games?
Doubtfully. We haven’t passed that often in a first half since.
"I don’t intend to draw any conclusions from any single game." -Brian Burke
"I will now attempt to exclude specific large amounts of TOP from the totals of winning teams, in order to prove that TOP doesn't contribute to winning." -Dr. Jeremy Arkes
Nor in an entire game. The only higher pass-to-run ratio this season was against the Packers and the repercussions of that weren’t as apparent, because Green Bay was basically playing the same game, despite neither team having a commanding lead. The Rams didn’t emulate us. They stuck to what they do best. If we’re unable to gain scoring separation against the 49ers, I’m sure they’d remain just as disciplined. It takes a top flight QB for any OC to think they can stand there and trade aerial shots with Brees. The 49ers just have a game manager in Smith. I don’t think anyone is blind to that fact, including Greg Roman.
"I don’t intend to draw any conclusions from any single game." -Brian Burke
"I will now attempt to exclude specific large amounts of TOP from the totals of winning teams, in order to prove that TOP doesn't contribute to winning." -Dr. Jeremy Arkes
And Chris Long, more so
basically ate Charlie Brown’s lunch and dinner, plus ended his season.
You think you know, and you don't know, and you never, ever, will.-Jim Mora Sr.
I understand ....nothing.-Michael Scott
The Future is Unwritten.-Joe Strummer
"First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win."-Mahatma Gandhi
this saints offense is lights years away from the 2010 game at SF..
(hyperbole.. anyone..?)
but really, big difference in the overall production of the offense.. for several factors not just a couple of improved positions..
i would also say that the saints run defense has improved a lot within this year..
the couple of runs that got away from us sunday for example, for more a product of the threat that newton presents as a runner.. with the added wild-cat look they tried to confuse us with.. the one break-away run was a product of being hit with a trap draw on a defensive blitz.. a lot like the ivory play scorched them.. it happens..
i would expect the 7,000+ saints offense to bring a little weigh to the stick.. & we would be bringing a few more than 20 points..
smith will have to throw for 250-275 yards minimum, to beat brees..
by the 9th plague on Jan 2, 2012 8:49 PM CST up reply actions
Makes me wonder
if we’re going to make any splashes in FA this offseason, other than re-signing Drew. Thinking ahead, I know, but after seeing Sproles…
"J.R. SMITH! WITH NO REGARD FOR COMMON SENSE!" - Future Kevin Harlan Quote
"They're two-deep at the crazy position!" - Kenny "The Jet" Smith.
A friend of mine and I were just talking about that yesterday. One move I’d like to see — and it seems like a real possibility — is Vincent Jackson. Odds are he’s friends with Sproles and he would no doubt start for the Saints opposite either Colston or Meachem. I think there’s a pretty good chance at least one of those two could walk, but even if both re-sign, Henderson peaked long ago and Arrington has yet to prove his worth as a regular in the rotation.
"I don’t intend to draw any conclusions from any single game." -Brian Burke
"I will now attempt to exclude specific large amounts of TOP from the totals of winning teams, in order to prove that TOP doesn't contribute to winning." -Dr. Jeremy Arkes
And he did play one season with Brees.
"I don’t intend to draw any conclusions from any single game." -Brian Burke
"I will now attempt to exclude specific large amounts of TOP from the totals of winning teams, in order to prove that TOP doesn't contribute to winning." -Dr. Jeremy Arkes
Forgot about that one.
This isn't about rules, it's about manners. Now there's no rule that says that I cant come over here and fart on your entree. But I don't do it. Why? Because it's not good manners.
Trouble is, he’s probably higher on most teams’ radars than either Colston or Meachem, so I don’t know if he’ll still be around to serve as a counter move. If they want him, they may have to go after him strongly with the notion that he’s going to be Henderson’s replacement, then quickly attempt to convince Colston and/or Meachem of that. If they’re under the impression that they’re being replaced, then the odds of them walking become even greater. Not like the world ends either way, mind you. Jackson is better than either, in terms of an all around skills set. Bit of a miscontent, though I’m sure that would evaporate quickly in an offense like this.
"I don’t intend to draw any conclusions from any single game." -Brian Burke
"I will now attempt to exclude specific large amounts of TOP from the totals of winning teams, in order to prove that TOP doesn't contribute to winning." -Dr. Jeremy Arkes
On the other hand, we've drafted pretty well, receiver-wise,
and we’ve seen Moore go from undrafted to the verge of stardom, even if that’s Dancing with the Stars. I’m not entirely convinced we need to go out and get a big-name, money guy. I think SP’s system does a nice job of recognizing talent and elevating their games.
This isn't about rules, it's about manners. Now there's no rule that says that I cant come over here and fart on your entree. But I don't do it. Why? Because it's not good manners.
Stardom through utilization isn’t the same thing as stardom through raw talent. If a true game changer was involved in our receiving corps, they would stand out from the rest based on YAC. He would also open up the offense for everyone else involved. That’s basically the same argument used by Bush apologists for years. The difference being that Bush wasn’t a legitimate NFL receiver. He’s a hybrid player. We have enough hybrid backs as it is. What this offense could really use is a superstar to draw double teams. You’re kind of seeing that now in Graham, but that’s more on the interior, including OBL help. I’m talking about a presence on the edge that will help compensate for our iffy play at OT, by helping plays develop downfield quicker, so Brees doesn’t have to duck and dart to buy time for himself as often.
"I don’t intend to draw any conclusions from any single game." -Brian Burke
"I will now attempt to exclude specific large amounts of TOP from the totals of winning teams, in order to prove that TOP doesn't contribute to winning." -Dr. Jeremy Arkes
Problem being, you have to pay more for stardom from talent.
We know where Loomis stands on that.
This isn't about rules, it's about manners. Now there's no rule that says that I cant come over here and fart on your entree. But I don't do it. Why? Because it's not good manners.
Three of their safeties are going to be up for grabs, also. Unfortunately, none of them are named Weddle.
"I don’t intend to draw any conclusions from any single game." -Brian Burke
"I will now attempt to exclude specific large amounts of TOP from the totals of winning teams, in order to prove that TOP doesn't contribute to winning." -Dr. Jeremy Arkes
Now DBs, we can use.
Particularly given the health issues, and occasionally the suck issues, of our defensive backfield the last couple of years.
This isn't about rules, it's about manners. Now there's no rule that says that I cant come over here and fart on your entree. But I don't do it. Why? Because it's not good manners.
Agreed. I like Porter as a nickel, but he gets hurt a lot. Patrick is still a work in progress. Quddus seems like roughly the same player as Usama Young, which is pretty good, considering we didn’t have to spend a draft pick on him. Harper is a flat out liability in coverage and should probably be used situationally, in lieu of starting. Not sure if his salary merits such concessions in playing time, but that’s a debate for a different day.
"I don’t intend to draw any conclusions from any single game." -Brian Burke
"I will now attempt to exclude specific large amounts of TOP from the totals of winning teams, in order to prove that TOP doesn't contribute to winning." -Dr. Jeremy Arkes
Has a reputation as a malcontent and a drunk driving suspension under his belt.
I doubt very seriously that the Saints pursue him.
"I want to hand this trophy to the MVP of the Super Bowl -- and the MVP of the entire league.''
-- Saints coach Sean Payton, handing the Vince Lombardi Trophy to Drew Brees after Super Bowl 44.
Jonathan Casillas? Chris Ivory? Carl Nicks? Bobby McCray? Jeremy Shockey?
"I don’t intend to draw any conclusions from any single game." -Brian Burke
"I will now attempt to exclude specific large amounts of TOP from the totals of winning teams, in order to prove that TOP doesn't contribute to winning." -Dr. Jeremy Arkes
If you can get Vincent Jackson as cheap as the Saints got Shockey, then go for it.
"I want to hand this trophy to the MVP of the Super Bowl -- and the MVP of the entire league.''
-- Saints coach Sean Payton, handing the Vince Lombardi Trophy to Drew Brees after Super Bowl 44.
If you include the value of the two picks we gave up for Shockey, I’m sure that’s possible.
"I don’t intend to draw any conclusions from any single game." -Brian Burke
"I will now attempt to exclude specific large amounts of TOP from the totals of winning teams, in order to prove that TOP doesn't contribute to winning." -Dr. Jeremy Arkes
If Vincent Jackson gets the kind of money he thinks he’s worth, I highly doubt it.
"I want to hand this trophy to the MVP of the Super Bowl -- and the MVP of the entire league.''
-- Saints coach Sean Payton, handing the Vince Lombardi Trophy to Drew Brees after Super Bowl 44.
He just played out a one season extension for $11M. I’m sure it will be less than that per season for a multi-year contract. That surely doesn’t exceed what Shockey + 2nd and 5th round pick make.
"I don’t intend to draw any conclusions from any single game." -Brian Burke
"I will now attempt to exclude specific large amounts of TOP from the totals of winning teams, in order to prove that TOP doesn't contribute to winning." -Dr. Jeremy Arkes
Q: Could the Chargers Franchise Tag V.Jackson
also same could go for Reggie Wayne. The Colts are looking to clean house, Reggie could end up a Texan, playing opposite Andre Johnson.
You think you know, and you don't know, and you never, ever, will.-Jim Mora Sr.
I understand ....nothing.-Michael Scott
The Future is Unwritten.-Joe Strummer
"First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win."-Mahatma Gandhi
They could, but Jackson isn’t coming off anything close to a Top 5 WR season, so I seriously doubt they’ll be looking to make that investment.
"I don’t intend to draw any conclusions from any single game." -Brian Burke
"I will now attempt to exclude specific large amounts of TOP from the totals of winning teams, in order to prove that TOP doesn't contribute to winning." -Dr. Jeremy Arkes
Nor will any team. He’ll be a hot commodity in terms of talent, but no one’s going to mortgage the farm.
"I don’t intend to draw any conclusions from any single game." -Brian Burke
"I will now attempt to exclude specific large amounts of TOP from the totals of winning teams, in order to prove that TOP doesn't contribute to winning." -Dr. Jeremy Arkes
His point of contention was not over not being paid as a number one wideout. Considering what he’s accomplished in San Diego, I think he was completely within his rights to b****.
"I don’t intend to draw any conclusions from any single game." -Brian Burke
"I will now attempt to exclude specific large amounts of TOP from the totals of winning teams, in order to prove that TOP doesn't contribute to winning." -Dr. Jeremy Arkes
He can bitch all he wants, but in doing so he violated the terms of the contract that he signed and agreed to play under. So no, he was not completely within his rights, and that’s why he was suspended for 3 games (in addition to the aforementioned 3 game drunken driving suspension). If he didn’t want the contract he had, he shouldn’t have signed it.
"I want to hand this trophy to the MVP of the Super Bowl -- and the MVP of the entire league.''
-- Saints coach Sean Payton, handing the Vince Lombardi Trophy to Drew Brees after Super Bowl 44.
He didn’t get paid for the games missed due to the contract squabble and the Chargers were granted a roster exemption.
"I don’t intend to draw any conclusions from any single game." -Brian Burke
"I will now attempt to exclude specific large amounts of TOP from the totals of winning teams, in order to prove that TOP doesn't contribute to winning." -Dr. Jeremy Arkes
Is that supposed to somehow make it alright that their team was without their #1 WR? Its still a violation of his contract to refuse to play.
"I want to hand this trophy to the MVP of the Super Bowl -- and the MVP of the entire league.''
-- Saints coach Sean Payton, handing the Vince Lombardi Trophy to Drew Brees after Super Bowl 44.
Of course it’s all right. He’s looking out for his own well being, weighed the pros and cons of holding out and decided it was worth the hit to push the issue. Considering they re-signed him to what he was after, they could have saved themselves a lot of headaches by not playing hardball in the first place.
"I don’t intend to draw any conclusions from any single game." -Brian Burke
"I will now attempt to exclude specific large amounts of TOP from the totals of winning teams, in order to prove that TOP doesn't contribute to winning." -Dr. Jeremy Arkes
Its still a violation of his contract to refuse to play.
And the fines + lack of pay were the team’s compensation for that violation. Who’s debating whether or not it was a violation?
"I don’t intend to draw any conclusions from any single game." -Brian Burke
"I will now attempt to exclude specific large amounts of TOP from the totals of winning teams, in order to prove that TOP doesn't contribute to winning." -Dr. Jeremy Arkes
Contracts aren’t guaranteed anyway. I’m talking about him as a possible replacement for Henderson. Henderson is under contract beyond this season. Should we hold Loomis over the flames if he makes such a move? After all, he’d be screwing over Devery and wouldn’t even be fined for it. Mickey the malcontent.
"I don’t intend to draw any conclusions from any single game." -Brian Burke
"I will now attempt to exclude specific large amounts of TOP from the totals of winning teams, in order to prove that TOP doesn't contribute to winning." -Dr. Jeremy Arkes
Bobby Hebert basically did the same thing, as far as the contract holdout goes. He sat out the entire 1990 season because Jim Finks didn’t want to play him, eventually re-signed and led the team to two more playoff appearances. That doesn’t make Hebert a bad guy. That just means he knew he was worth more to the team than what they were paying him and wanted to be compensated accordingly.
"I don’t intend to draw any conclusions from any single game." -Brian Burke
"I will now attempt to exclude specific large amounts of TOP from the totals of winning teams, in order to prove that TOP doesn't contribute to winning." -Dr. Jeremy Arkes
If he didn’t want the contract he had, he shouldn’t have signed it.
That’s an incredibly myopic view. If the Saints don’t intend to pay a player they decide to cut the remainder of his contract after they release him, they shouldn’t have extended him a contract offer in the first place.
"I don’t intend to draw any conclusions from any single game." -Brian Burke
"I will now attempt to exclude specific large amounts of TOP from the totals of winning teams, in order to prove that TOP doesn't contribute to winning." -Dr. Jeremy Arkes
They structure the contract so that the team has a way to legally void the contract if the want. Players don’t have that right. Is it fair? No, but he put his name on that dotted line. Guess he should have read it.
"I want to hand this trophy to the MVP of the Super Bowl -- and the MVP of the entire league.''
-- Saints coach Sean Payton, handing the Vince Lombardi Trophy to Drew Brees after Super Bowl 44.
Players don’t have that right. Is it fair? No, but he put his name on that dotted line. Guess he should have read it.
So, if you signed a two year contract with a cell phone provider and your service sucks … dropped calls out the yin yang … you’re just going to suck it up and honor that contract, right? Please. Do you have any idea how many times I’ve reneged on deals I didn’t think were fair after the fact? That’s just looking out for number one.
"I don’t intend to draw any conclusions from any single game." -Brian Burke
"I will now attempt to exclude specific large amounts of TOP from the totals of winning teams, in order to prove that TOP doesn't contribute to winning." -Dr. Jeremy Arkes
If that’s the way you want to look at it, that’s fine. I just don’t want him pulling any crap like that if he signs with a team I like. His actions hurt the team and I don’t want him hurting the Saints.
"I want to hand this trophy to the MVP of the Super Bowl -- and the MVP of the entire league.''
-- Saints coach Sean Payton, handing the Vince Lombardi Trophy to Drew Brees after Super Bowl 44.
Loomis also kicked the tires on Leonard Little last season, someone who would have brought even less to the table.
"I don’t intend to draw any conclusions from any single game." -Brian Burke
"I will now attempt to exclude specific large amounts of TOP from the totals of winning teams, in order to prove that TOP doesn't contribute to winning." -Dr. Jeremy Arkes
Pay Brees, Franchise Colston, vice versa?
You think you know, and you don't know, and you never, ever, will.-Jim Mora Sr.
I understand ....nothing.-Michael Scott
The Future is Unwritten.-Joe Strummer
"First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win."-Mahatma Gandhi
Colston’s not worth Top 5 WR money. You’re kidding yourself, if you think he’s that valuable to the team. He’s the best we currently have obviously, but a franchise tag would be a huge mistake.
"I don’t intend to draw any conclusions from any single game." -Brian Burke
"I will now attempt to exclude specific large amounts of TOP from the totals of winning teams, in order to prove that TOP doesn't contribute to winning." -Dr. Jeremy Arkes
If they don’t use it on Brees, they won’t be using it this off season.
"I don’t intend to draw any conclusions from any single game." -Brian Burke
"I will now attempt to exclude specific large amounts of TOP from the totals of winning teams, in order to prove that TOP doesn't contribute to winning." -Dr. Jeremy Arkes
Yep, Brees
maybe SP will defer some of his salary, to keep Colston, a la GW. LOL
You think you know, and you don't know, and you never, ever, will.-Jim Mora Sr.
I understand ....nothing.-Michael Scott
The Future is Unwritten.-Joe Strummer
"First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win."-Mahatma Gandhi
SP's salary doesn't help us with the salary cap.
That’s our biggest hurdle right now.
Drew Brees....MVP Saint! Who Dat!!!
by cajuncommando58 on Jan 3, 2012 7:41 AM CST up reply actions
don't know if anyone has noticed:
but the Falcons have an almost identical schedule as we do, with the difference being they play the Lions & Cardinals, whereas we play the 49ers and Packers
LOVING MOORE, GRAHAM AND THE COOL BREES!
Also, they play the Saints twice, we don't.
Actually, the NFL usually gives all the teams in a division the same schedule (more or less). It helps with tiebreakers and whatnot.
This isn't about rules, it's about manners. Now there's no rule that says that I cant come over here and fart on your entree. But I don't do it. Why? Because it's not good manners.
Yep NFC South v NFC E and AFC W + 2 NFC Conf. opp.by record I think
plus division foes. Standard.
You think you know, and you don't know, and you never, ever, will.-Jim Mora Sr.
I understand ....nothing.-Michael Scott
The Future is Unwritten.-Joe Strummer
"First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win."-Mahatma Gandhi
Packers
Why can’t Green Bay come and play in NOLA? Two years in a row we have to play them on the road.
Different sides of the scheduling rotation. The rotation for playing an entire division (the entire NFC North in this case) has one rotation rule. The rotation for playing the NFC-N team in equal-place-division-result is a separate rotation. In 2011 we played the entire NFC North, which means we were due for playing @GB and @MIN (as opposed to 2008, the previous time we played the entire NFC-N, where we were at home vs GB, plus @CHI and @DET).
In 2010 we played the 2009 NFC-N team that finished in the same divisional ranking as we did the previous year (which happened to have been MIN) and we got to play them at home. This is why we were able to have the “NFCCG rematch” to open the season. But because 2011 gets skipped (different scheduling rotation) then the next time up we are due to play @ the same divisional ranking team… and that just happens to put us at @GB for two years in a row.
You nailed it. That never occurs with teams from the opposite conference. Well, unless they change conferences, like Seattle did.
"I don’t intend to draw any conclusions from any single game." -Brian Burke
"I will now attempt to exclude specific large amounts of TOP from the totals of winning teams, in order to prove that TOP doesn't contribute to winning." -Dr. Jeremy Arkes
Great explanation.
I was just being whiny. I’ll admit it, Green Bay’s a tough one in Green Bay. I’m also annoyed that all the west coast teams travel to NO, because I live in Ca. so I don’t have a lot of opportunities to see them live.
"Who are we? We find that we live on an insignificant planet of a humdrum star lost in a galaxy tucked away in some forgotten corner of a universe in which there are far more galaxies than people. " -Carl Sagan
by crescendo2020 on Jan 4, 2012 5:28 AM CST up reply actions
I can already the 4 primetime games for 2012
1) Away vs. Atlanta Falcons (Monday night, possibly last game of the season)
2) Home vs. 49ers (NBC Primetime game; if we win the Super Bowl, bank on it to be the 2012 Opening Game)
3) Away vs. Green Bay Packers (NBC Sunday night game)
4) Away vs. Dallas Cowboys (I have a feeling it will be a NFL Network Thursday Night Game)
Actually Last Game of the Season will have to be an NBC game, IF the Saints/Falcons game decides the division
There will be a Primetime game vs. the Falcons, it’s been like that for the last 4 years
I think we go 12-4 next year
Wins: Atlanta (away game); Carolina (home game); Tampa (both games); San Diego, Kansas City, Denver, Oakland, Philadelphia, Green Bay, San Francisco, Washington
Losses: Atlanta (at home); Carolina (on the road); NY Giants, Dallas
I think Atlanta takes a step back next year and Carolina surges. Thinking about it now, I think Carolina and us will be fighting for the division
Atlanta already took a step back this year (at least in luck and amount of help they got from the refs). Not sure how much further they can step back unless they either A) get a really crappy offensive coordinator, or B) suffer a huge wave of injuries.
I could easily see A happening. They have Bob Bratkowski as the QB coach and OC-in-waiting behind Mularkey. If Mularkey gets a HC job, they could easily promote Bob. The problem (for them, not us) is that Bob is a predictable idiot. Bengals fans didn’t call him Bratworst or Bratsuckski for nothing. He may get away with it in 2012 and maybe even 2013 but unless he makes MAJOR improvements by 2014-15 everybody who’s seen enough of their games will be able to predict the play from the players and formation with about 85+% accuracy.
B is completely unpredictable. They’re a bit due, they’ve had a few this year but nothing major, haven’t really had that since 2009. But it could easily be three more years before their next injury wave… or three more games… or anything in between. You just don’t know.
I could easily see Carolina improving if they can just find some healthy players. Two years in a row of massive injuries will result in some changes on that staff and roster. And frankly Tampa has plenty of talent, they just need qualified coordinators and coaches to motivate it, coach it, and use it properly on gameday.
Assuming Drew’s contract isn’t a full-offseason nightmare and we can at least keep two of our four most important other FAs (Nicks, Colston, Meachem, and probably Franklin), I doubt we’ll take THAT big a step backwards… but we could. Hosting the Super Bowl seems to almost be a curse on the team these last few years.
But if we are still at least good next year, then I could easily see a four-way dogfight next year.
we did
in 2008
whupped them on MNF right before Thanksgiving…
I just had a rap with Santa and we took us a little stroll
And all I want for Christmas is the Saints in the Super Bowl
by Hans Petersen on Jan 3, 2012 9:44 PM CST up reply actions

by 






















